- Open Access
Differences and biocontrol potential of haustorial endophytic fungi from Taxillus Chinensis on different host plants
BMC Microbiology volume 23, Article number: 128 (2023)
To explore the community composition and diversity of the endophytic fungi in Taxillus chinensis, samples of the parasites growing on seven different hosts, Morus alba, Prunus salicina, Phellodendron chinense, Bauhinia purpurea, Dalbergia odorifera, Diospyros kaki and Dimocarpus longan, were isolated. The strains were identified by their morphological characteristics and their internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences.
150 different endophytic fungi were isolated from the haustorial roots of the seven hosts with a total isolation rate of 61.24%. These endophytic fungi were found to belong to 1 phylum, 2 classes, 7 orders, 9 families, 11 genera and 8 species. Among of them, Pestalotiopsis, Neopestalotiopsis and Diaporthe were the dominant genera, accounting for 26.67, 17.33 and 31.33% of the total number of strains, respectively. Diversity and similarity analyses showed that the endophytic fungi isolated from D. longan (H’=1.60) had the highest diversity index. The highest richness indexes were found in M. alba and D. odorifera (both 2.23). The evenness index of D. longan was the highest (0.82). The similarity coefficient of D. odorifera was the most similar to D. longan and M. alba (33.33%), while the similarity coefficient of P. chinense was the lowest (7.69%) with M. alba and D. odorifera. Nine strains showed antimicrobial activities. Among them, Pestalotiopsis sp., N. parvum and H. investiens showed significant antifungal activity against three fungal phytopathogens of medicinal plants. At the same time, the crude extracts from the metabolites of the three endophytic fungi had strong inhibitory effects on the three pathogens. Pestalotiopsis sp., N. parvum and H. investiens had the strongest inhibitory effects of S. cucurbitacearum, with inhibitory rates of 100%, 100% and 81.51%, respectively. In addition, N. parvum had a strong inhibitory effect on D. glomerata and C. cassicola, with inhibitory rates of 82.35% and 72.80%, respectively.
These results indicate that the species composition and diversity of endophytic fungi in the branches of T. chinensis were varied in the different hosts and showed good antimicrobial potential in the control of plant pathogens.
Endophytic fungi are fungi that live in plant tissues and have no obvious disease symptoms at a certain period of their life history. They generally colonize healthy plant tissues and organs with a wide variety of species and wide distribution [1,2,3]. Since Stierle et al. first reported that an endophytic fungus isolated from Taxus breviflia was able to synthesize paclitaxel, an anticancer substance, the study of such fungi in medicinal plants has become a research hotspot . It was reported that there were significant differences in the diversity, community structure and composition of endophytic fungi in leaves, with differences in the community structure increasing with the age of the fungi present . For example, the dominant fungi in the endophytic fungal community were Aspergillus, Candida and Mycosphaerella . Of these, the diversity of endophytic fungi isolated from the tubers was the highest.
Liu et al. found that the community diversity of endophytic fungi in Astragalus membranaceus was low, and Hemileia and Gibberella were the dominant populations of these fungi . Yang et al. found that Lophiostoma was the dominant genus in the community composition of endophytic fungi in the bark of Eucommia ulmoides from three habitats . The population structure and distribution patterns of endophytic fungi is closely related to environmental changes, such as temperature, humidity, light, geographical location and the surrounding vegetation, classification of host plants and genetic background [8, 9]. In addition, the growth stage configuration (age) of host plants and tissues may also affect the species composition of endophytic communities . Only a few specific endophytic fungi can be colonized in these plants, resulting in a certain regional specificity of the endophytic fungi population structure . Different endophytic species have been found in the parenchyma and vascular tissues of host plants of different ages .
Recent studies have shown that endophytic fungi with the ability to produce active substances that inhibit pathogenic fungi can be isolated and screened from different tissues and organs of healthy plants [13,14,15,16,17,18]. For example, the organic crude extracts isolated from Trichoderma erinaceum significantly inhibited the mycelial growth of Pythium ultimum . In addition, T. harzianum can be used as a biological control agent to inhibit post-harvest avocado (Persea americana Mill) pathogens, thereby avoiding significant losses of this internationally important fruit . Bioactive compounds exclusively produced by these endophytic fungi are important for improving their adaptability to host plants and increasing their tolerance to biological and abiotic stresses. In addition, these compounds can induce the production of a large number of known and novel bioactive secondary metabolites [21,22,23]. These can not only promote seedling growth and improve seedling resistance to drought, disease, predatory insects and non-physiological salt concentrations, but also improve the medicinal efficacy of host plants, which plays an important role in their medicinal value [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
Taxillus chinensis belonging to the Loranthaceae family are mainly distributed in the southern and southwestern areas of China. The dried stems and leafy branches of T. chinensis are commonly used as materials for traditional Chinese medicine and are known as “Sang Ji Sheng” in China. T. chinensis has a high medicinal value. It is used to relieve rheumatism, to strengthen the liver and kidney, the muscles and bones, as well as to prevent spontaneous abortions . Meanwhile, T. chinensis is also used as raw materials for making parasitism tea in China, and it is exported to nearly 30 countries in Southeast Asia . While there is an increasing market demand for this product, it also has a very important position in Guangxi and it is even sold on the national Chinese herbal medicine markets.
To date, there are only a few reports to investigate biodiversity of endophytic fungi of the genus Pestalotiopsis. Gong et al. isolated an endophytic fungus of the genus Pestalotiopsis from the T. chinensis, which had significant inhibitory effects on cultured A549 and H460 tumor cells . Therefore, in this study, seven host species, including Morus alba, Prunus salicina, Phellodendron chinense, Dalbergia odorifera, Bauhinia purpurea, Diospyros kaki and Dimocarpus longan were selected as branches of T. chinensis, respectively. They were used to survey the endophytic fungi diversity of T. chinensis on different hosts of this species. We also evaluated their antagonistic effects against three important plant pathogens, Corynespora cassicola of Sarcandra glabra, Didymella glomerata of Sophora tonkinensis and Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum of Siraitia grosvenorii. The endophytic fungi strains with strong antifungal activity were screened out to lay a foundation for the development of new antimicrobial resources. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time the diversity and antifungal activity of endophytic fungi in T. chinensis were studied systematically.
IR of endophytic fungi
A total of 150 endophytic fungal strains were isolated and purified from 245 tissue segments from T. chinensis parasitized on different host plants and the average IR of the endophytic fungi from T. chinensis was 61.22%. However, the IR of endophytic fungi from T. chinensis varied greatly due to the differences of host plants species. The highest IR of endophytic fungi was obtained from T. chinensis parasitized on M. alba, and this was 91.43%. However, the lowest IR of endophytic fungi was obtained from T. chinensis parasitized on P. chinense and this was only 28.57% (Fig. 1 and Table S1).
Colony composition of endophytic fungi of T. chinensis
The morphological characteristics and molecular biology of the isolated strains were combined to determine the classification of the endophytic fungi in this study. There were 150 strains of endophytic fungi as well as three strains which were not clearly identified. The overall IR was 61.24% (Table 1). Other strains belonged to 1 phylum, 2 classes, 7 orders, 9 families, 11 genera and 12 species (Fig. 2), including ascomycetes, Ascomycota. Sordariomycetes was the dominant group, accounting for 96.00% of the total number of strains. At the order level, the dominant one was Xylariales, accounting for 46.67% of the total number of strains (Fig. 3-A and Table s2). At the genus level, Pestalotiopsis, Neopestalotiopsis and Diaporthe were the dominant genera, accounting for 26.67, 17.33 and 31.33% of the total strains, respectively (Fig. 3-B). Nigrospora, Xylaria, Fusarium and Exserohilum were the common genera, accounting for 7.33, 1.33, 1.33, 1.33% of the total strains, respectively (Fig. 3-B). Hypoxylon, Daldinia, Colletotrichum and Neofusicoccum were rare genera, accounting for 0.67% of the total strains (Table 1; Fig. 3-B and Table s3). Sequences of these twelve strains were submitted to the GenBank database, and the accession numbers obtained were MZ836840, MZ823600, MZ2823598, MZ836841, MZ836842, MZ836843, MZ823601, MZ836844, MZ823599, MZ836845, MZ823597 and MZ836846 for strains 1, 15, P6, 20, 17, 24, 4, 13, N6, 22, 31 and 9, respectively.
IR of endophytic fungi in different hosts of T. chinensis
The number of endophytic fungal strains isolated from T. chinensis branches of different hosts was different, with the highest number of 32 endophytic fungal strains isolated from M. alba. This was followed by D. odorifera, D. longan, B. purpurea, P. salicina and D. Kaki which consisted of 27, 26, 23, 20 and 12 strains, respectively. Only 10 were isolated from P. chinense.
The IFs of endophytic fungi from the branches of T. chinensis of the seven hosts were also analyzed. The most frequently isolated endophytic fungi were Pestalotiopsis and Neopestalotiopsis in the parasitic branches of T. chinensis from M. Alba, D. odorifera, D. Longan, P. salicina and D. Kaki. Among them, M. alba and D. odorifera had the highest separation frequencies with both reaching 7.33%. In addition to P. chinense, the endophytic fungi with the highest IF in the parasitic branches of the other 6 hosts were Diaporthe, among which D. odorifera had the highest IF of up to 12%, followed by B. purpurea which was up to 10% (Fig. 4 and Table s4).
Diversity of endophytic fungi of T. chinensis in different hosts
Table 2 shows the diversity index of endophytic fungi of the haustoria of T. chinense that parasitized the seven plants, D. longan (1.60) > D. odorifera(1.51) > M. alba (1.41) > P. chinense (1.16) > B. purpurea (1.03) > P. salicina > (0.86) > D. kaki (0.77). The richness indexes were calculated to be M. alba (2.23) = P. chinense (2.23) > D. longan (1.97) > D. odorifera (1.95) > B. purpurea > (1.29) > D. kaki (1.11) > P. salicina (0.69). The evenness indexes were D. longan (0.82) > P. salicina (0.79) > D. odorifera (0.73) > P. chinense (0.72) > M. alba (0.68) > B. purpurea (0.64) > D. kaki (0.56). The results showed that D. longan had the largest diversity index (1.60), with the largest richness index (2.23) of endophytic fungi of the haustoria found in M. alba and P. chinense. D. longan also had the largest evenness index (0.82).
Similarity coefficients of endophytic fungi of T. chinensis in different hosts
Table 3 shows that the similarity coefficients of endophytic fungi of the haustoria of T. chinense that parasitized different hosts were different. The similarity coefficient between D. longan and D. kaki was the highest, which was 36.36%. The similarity coefficient of D. longan, M. alba and D. odorifera was 33.33% and that of P. salicina and D. kaki was 28.57%. The similarity coefficient of D. longan and M. alba was 26.67%. The similarity coefficient was the lowest with M. alba and P. chinense with D. odorifera (7.69%), while there was no similarity coefficient with P. salicina and D. kaki, indicating that there were no similar endophytic fungi of the haustoria of T. chinense between P. salicina and D. kaki with P. salicina.
In vitro antagonistic assays of endophytic fungi against phytopathogens
The antagonistic activity of 9 fungal endophytes against the plant pathogens C. cassicola, D. glomerate and S. cucurbitacearum was evaluated in co-culture tests (Table 4). These 9 strains of endophytic fungi had different degrees of inhibition on the three pathogens, and the inhibition rates were above 60%. Among the 11 strains, Neofusicoccum parvum showed a significant antagonistic activity against D. glomerata and C. cassicola, and the inhibition rates were 85.29% and 78.82%, respectively. However, there was no inhibition with S. cucurbitacearum. The species, Hypoxylon investiens, was the one that had the best inhibition of S. cucurbitacearum. The inhibition rate was 83.53%.
Antimicrobial activity of crude extracts from fermentation products of endophytic fungi
As can be seen from Fig. 5 (Table s5), the crude metabolite extracts of the endophytic fungi strains 9, 17 and P6 of T. Chinensis seeds had obvious inhibitory effects on these three pathogens, and they can be used as fermentation production strains. The antifungal activities of the crude extracts of fermentation products of strains 9, 17 and P6 are shown in Fig. 6. As shown in Fig. 5 (Table s5), when the concentration of crude extracts was 100 mg/mL and they were cultured for 11 days, the results showed that they could significantly inhibit the growth of D. glomerata, C. cassicola and S. cucurbitacearum. Among these, strains 9, 17 and P6 had the strongest inhibitory effects of S. cucurbitacearum in Table 5, with inhibitory rates of 100, 100 and 81.51%, respectively. Secondly, strain 9 had strong inhibitory effects on D. glomerata and C. cassicola, with inhibitory rates of 82.35% and 72.80%, respectively. The extracts of strains 9, 17 and P6 were 6.456, 11.069 and 9.727 g, respectively.
In this study, a total of 150 endophytic fungi belonging to 11 genera were isolated from healthy haustorial roots of T. chinensis of 7 hosts from the same habitat in Guangxi, China. Among them, Pestalotiopsis, Neopestalotiopsis and Diaporthe had high IFs and were widely distributed in these hosts. As the dominant genus of endophytic fungi, these results are similar to those reported for endophytic fungi in Taxilli herba from Salix babylonica in Guangxi . There were some differences in the distribution of endophytic fungi in the haustoria of T. chinensis of different hosts. Four species, Exserohilum rostratum, Neofusicoccum parvum, Hypoxylon investiens and Nigrospora musae, were isolated only from the haustorial roots of P. chinense, and Daldinia govorovae was just found from the haustorial roots of M. longan. Two species, Xylaria longipes and Diaporthe perseae, were exclusively isolated from the haustorial roots of B. purpurea, while Nigrospora sphaerica, Xylaria sp. and Fusarium sp. were isolated just from the haustorial branches of T. chinensis. In addition, Colletotrichum acutatum and Fusarium incarnatum were found only from the haustorial roots of D. odorifera. All these results indicated that the distribution of endophytic fungi had a certain host specificity [34,35,36]. When combined with the results of diversity and similarity coefficient analysis of endophytic fungi of the seven hosts, it was found that there were some differences among the endophytic fungi of the haustoria of T. chinensis in different plants. Since samples were collected from the same places and the same habitats in this study, the results strongly indicated that there might be some preferences for endophytic fungi of haustorial roots of T. chinensis different hosts.
In this study, samples were collected from parasitized branches of seven hosts in the same habitat and during the same season (winter), and the parasitized branches of D. longan were more abundant in endophytic fungi. The species and quantity of endophytic fungi in medicinal plants were rich and varied in the different hosts, and the endophytic fungi in medicinal plants are also likely to change with the changes of regions, seasons, growth stage, tissues and organs [37, 38]. Lü et al. (2014) showed that the IR of endophytic fungi in Atractylodes lancea of Maoshan type was higher than that in A. lancea of Hu Bei type, and the composition of fungal diversity was also partially different . With the change of seasons, the endophytic fungal community showed certain succession rules, and the diversity of endophytic fungi in summer was higher than that in spring and autumn. Shu et al. found that the number and species of endophytic fungi in branches were more than those in the leaves and fruits in different tissues of Citrus maxima . Wang et al. showed that the abundance and diversity of fungi in the wild environment were higher than those in a park environment for Paris polyphyllain [37, 38]. Ren et al. found that as the altitude increased, the diversity of endophytic fungi in the roots of Rhododendron simsii was less varied, the community distribution was more uneven and the dominant fungi were more prominent . In addition, the species of dominant endophytic fungi were geographically different [42, 43]. For example, Xu et al. found that the mycorrhizal fungal community diversity of Cypripedium tibeticum (Huanglong Gully, Sichuan) at different altitudes also decreased with an increase of altitude . Therefore, the next step of this research is to explore the gathering of specimens from different habitats and different altitudes, different organizations and different seasons with regards to the endophytic fungi diversity and similarity coefficients of T. chinensis, in order to further understand the distribution of these fungi in T. chinensis. This will help to explore more endophytic fungi resources, and lay a good theoretical basis for the next steps of antifungal activity screening and in-depth research, with good biocontrol potential.
Endophytic fungi of medicinal plants can inhibit fungi and prevent diseases. They also have a broad spectrum of inhibition properties and have the potential to develop biological control substances [44, 45]. In this work, N. parvum and H. investiens showed significant antifungal activities against three fungal phytopathogens of medicinal plants. N. parvum and H. investiens are tall and they are able to occupy space and absorb nutrients rapidly, so as to effectively compete with other pathogens for nutrition and space and inhibit their growth. However, studies have shown that N. parvum can cause a variety of woody plants and fruits canker disease and dieback [46,47,48,49,50,51,52], which is a harmful pathogenic fungus in agriculture. It has been reported that N. parvum had the strongest pathogenicity , but in this study, this property it belongs to endophytic fungi. Aly et al. reported that endophytic fungi parasitized on healthy plants can cause plant disease and become pathogenic when they are subjected to environmental stress . Endophytic fungi have a dynamic equilibrium antagonistic relationship with host plants . Whether the fungus causes host disease, its pathogenicity and toxin-producing ability need to be further studied. Therefore, in the selection of biocontrol strains, the endophytic fungi must be tested for the presence of phytotoxins before it can be used.
This study provides insight for the isolation of endophytic fungal community diversity from seven host plants of T. chinensis. The diversity of endophytic fungi in seven host plants of T. chinensis was studied for the first time. A total of 150 different endophytic fungi were isolated from the haustorial roots of the seven hosts for the first time. Among of them, Pestalotiopsis, Neopestalotiopsis and Diaporthe were the dominant genera, accounting for 26.67, 17.33 and 31.33% of the total number of strains, respectively. The isolated endophytic fungi (N. parvum, H. investiens and Pestalotiopsis sp.) showed strong inhibitory effects on three pathogens of medicinal plants. At the same time, the crude extracts from the metabolites of these three endophytic fungi also had strong pathogen inhibitory effects. These beneficial microorganisms in our present study will benefit the biological control research and also be a good source of new active compounds. This data also provides a reference for research of other plant species that grow on endophytic microorganisms.
Materials and methods
The sample collection of T. chinensis
In January 2020, the haustoria of T. chinensis from different hosts including M. alba, P. salicina, P. chinense, D. odorifera, B. purpurea, D. kaki and D. longann were collected in the T. chinensis planting base of Cenxi Funing Village, Wuzhou, Wuzhou City (111°51′14″E, 22°58′12″N) (Fig. 6). The seven different hosts were situated within 20 m of each other. We collected 3–5 haustoria of T. chinensis from the same host plants and these were placed in labelled, sealed bags and then they were returned to the laboratory for endophytic fungi isolation within 48 h of collection.
Isolation and purification of endophytic fungi
Healthy and disease-free haustorial roots of T. chinensis from different hosts were selected and the tissues were cut into 5 cm fragments . The surfaces were sterilized with 75% ethanol and 0.1% HgCl2 for 2.5 min, and they were then washed with sterile water 3 times. Using sterile forceps and scalpels, they were cut into tissue blocks of about 5 mm in size, and then placed in PDA medium containing streptomycin and plated with 7 blocks per plate. Each sample consisted of 5 plates. The surface sterilization was tested thoroughly by the sterilization method of ultra-clean workbenches, bleach solution and tissue blotting, so as to ensure the accurate separation of endophytic fungi from T. chinensis . The cultures were incubated at 28℃ until the mycelia grew from the edges of the tissue blocks, and these were then transferred to PDA plates for culture, purification and preservation. The isolated and purified endophytic fungi were divided into different morphological types according to the characteristics of the culture colonies .
Identification of endophytic fungi
The colony morphology was recorded by referring to Fang’s method , and the preliminary identification of colony morphology was conducted by using Wei’s method  as well as the use of the international classification website (http://www.indexfungorum.org). For molecular biological identification, a MightyAmp DNA Polymerase Ver.3 (1.25 U/50 µL) kit (Takara Bio Inc., Japan, Cat. No. R076A) was used. The universal primers, ITS1 and ITS4,  were used for sequence amplification. Colonies of cultured endophytic fungal hyphae were selected as templates for direct PCR reactions. The target bands were detected by gel imaging methods, and the PCR products of the target bands were sent to BGI (Guangzhou) Co. Ltd. for sequencing. The sequencing results were compared with the sequences in the GenBank of NCBI using BLAST. The linking method of MEGA 7.0 software was used to construct an ITS-rDNA phylogenetic tree by employing the method of Kumar . This allowed the similarity between a target sequence and a phylogenetically relevant referenced 95% sequence to be identified and these were then classified as an unidentified strain. More than 95% of the strains were identified to the genus level and more than 97% were identified to the species level. In addition, it was found that more than 99% were identified as the same species .
Diversity analysis and data processing
Isolation Rate (IR): This refers to the percentage of the number of isolated strains in the sample tissue blocks to the total number of sample tissue blocks, and it was used to measure the abundance of endophytic fungi in plant tissues and the occurrence frequency of multiple infections in each tissue block.
Isolation frequency (IF): This refers to the percentage of the number of isolated endophytic fungi strains to the total number of isolated endophytic fungi, and it was used to reflect the dominance of endophytic fungi of different species (classes) in the total flora. IF ≥ 10% was the dominant genus, IF ≥ 1% was the common genus, IF < 1% are rare genera .
Shannon-Wiener (H’) = -Σ(PilnPi), where Pi refers to the percentage of the number of a certain strain of endophytic fungi to the total number of all isolated endophytic fungi, and this was value used to analyze the diversity of endophytic fungi and the complexity of the community in a specific community .
Species richness index (Margalef’s index, D): D= (total number of taxa − 1)/ln (total number of individuals), was used to analyze the richness of the taxa .
Evenness index (E): E = H’/Ln(S), where H’ is Shannon-Wiener index and S was the number of species found, and this was used to analyze the evenness of the distribution of endophytic fungi of different species in different hosts.
Sorenson’s similarity coefficients (Cs) were used to evaluate the similarity of the species composition of endophytic fungi between two hosts. The formula used to obtain this value was Cs = 2j/(a + b), where j is the number of species shared by the two populations, a is the number of all the species in the first population and b is the number of all the species in the second population.
In vitro antagonistic assays of endophytes against fungal phytopathogens
The in vitro antagonistic activity of endophytic fungi against Corynespora cassicola of Sarcandra glabra, Didymella glomerata of Sophora tonkinensis and Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum of Siraitia grosvenorii were tested using the co-culture method [64, 65]. Briefly, one mycelial plug (6 mm diam) of each 7-d-old fungal phytopathogen was placed in the center of a dish containing approximately 9 mL of PDA, to a final depth of 2 mm. Two mycelial plugs (6 mm diam) from one 7-d-old endophytic fungus were symmetrically placed 2 cm from the endophytic inoculant to establish a co-culture treatment. A sample of only the pathogen was used as a control. Each inhibitory experiment was replicated three times. The cultures were incubated at 28 °C. The radii of the relative fungal phytopathogen colony in the treatment dishes were measured only when the fungal phytopathogen colony had reached the center of the petri dishes in the growth control samples. The average radius of each fungal phytopathogen in the treatment was recorded as R1, and that in the growth control was recorded as R2. The growth inhibition percentage of the fungal phytopathogen with respect to the endophyte, phytopathogen antagonism, was calculated using the following formula:
Crude extract preparation of the fungal fermentation broth
The seed endophytic fungus with the best antibacterial activity was selected as the production strain for small-scale solid fermentation. The production strains were seeded on PDA culture plates and incubated at 28 °C for 5 days. After colony maturation, 5 truffle cakes with a diameter of 6 mm were inoculated into 50 mL triangular vials containing 20 mL of liquid potato medium as seed strains for culture. A total of 2 vials were inoculated and incubated at 28 °C for 3d by shaking at 120 rpm. 60 g of rice was added to a 500mL triangular bottle, 90mL was steamed with water, autoclaved for 20 min, cooled and placed under sterile conditions. 10 mL of seeded bacteria liquid was poured into 500 mL triangular bottles containing solid medium with a total of 4 bottles used. These were mixed well and covered with 8 layers of gauze, and incubate at 28 °C. After 30 days, the gauze was removed and methanol was poured in. The mixture was soaked and fermented and the liquid level was seen to increase by 1-2 cm. This was further soaked for 40 min and then subjected to ultrasonic extraction for 20 min. The mixture was filtered and this procedure was repeated for 3 times. The combined filtrate was kept at 45 °C constant temperature in a water bath and then this was subjected to rotary evaporation in order to dry the extract .
Antibacterial activity of crude extracts of fermentation products
The crude extract from 400 mg of fermentation products was weighed into a 5 mL sterilized centrifuge tube, and 4 mL of methanol was added to completely dissolve it in order to prepare a crude extract solution of 100 mg/mL. This was sterilized by filtration using a Millipore filter (0.22 μm) prior to antimicrobial assays. 1 mL of each solution was absorbed and coated with a pipette gun, and three plates were used for each gradient. The methanol in the plate was evaporated under sterile conditions, and the pathogenic fungi were inoculated into the center of the PDA plate. The cultures were incubated at 28 °C for 5 days, and the growth of the three pathogenic fungi were observed.
Statistical results were expressed as x ± s, with ± being the mean values and s being the standard deviations. SPSS19.0 software was used to conduct univariate ANOVA analysis and the variance homogeneity test for data in each group. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Sequences of these twelve strains were submitted to the GenBank database, and the accession numbers obtained were MZ836840, MZ823600, MZ823598, MZ836841, MZ836842, MZ836843, MZ823601, MZ836844, MZ823599, MZ836845, MZ823597 and MZ836846 for strains 1, 15, P6, 20, 17, 24, 4, 13, N6, 22, 31 and 9, respectively. Other data either generated or analyzed during this study are included in the article and its supplementary information files.
Polymerase chain reaction
Potato Dextrose Agar
Potato Dextrose Broth
Andnale NB, Shahnawaz M, Ade AB. Fungal endophytes of Plumbago zeylanica L. enhances plumbagin content. Bot Stud. 2019;60:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-019-0270-1.
Wilson D, Endophyte. The evolution of a term and clarification of its use and definition. Oikos. 1995;73:274–6. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545919.
Faeth SH, Fagan WF. Fungal endophytes: common host plant symbionts but uncommon mutualists. Integr Comp Biol. 2002;42:360–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/42.2.360.
Stierle A, Strobel G, Stierle D. Taxol and taxane production by Taxomyces andreanae, an endophytic fungus of Pacific yew. Science. 1993;260:214–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8097061.
Yang Q, Zou K, Chen AJ, Guo X, Liu XD, Liang YL. Endophytic fungal communities structure and variation in Ginkgo biloba leaf tissues with different ages. J Hunan Agricultural Univ (Natural Sciences). 2019;45:42–9.
Liu PP, Chen JN, Jia TZ. Analysis of diversity of endophytic fungi in astragali Radix by illumina MiSeq high ⁃ throughput sequencing technology. Chin J Experimental Traditional Med Formulae. 2018;24:34–8.
Yang J, Dong CB, Chen WH, Liang JD, Han YF, Liang ZQ. Community composition and ecological functional structural analysis of endophytic fungi in bark of Eucommia ulmoides in different areas. Chin J Chin Materia Med. 2019;44:1126–34. https://doi.org/10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20181226.005.
Suryanarayanan TS, Wittlinger SK, Faeth SH. Endophytic fungi associated with cacti in Arizona. Mycol Res. 2005;109:635–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756205002753.
Song S, Otkur M, Zhang Z, Tang Q. Isolation and characterization of endophytic microorganisms in Glaycyrrhiza inflat Bat. From Xinjiang. Microbiology. 2007;5:867–70. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-2654.2007.05.010.
Sieber TN. Endophytic fungi in forest trees: are they mutualists? Fung Biol Rev. 2007;21:75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2007.05.004.
Jiang S, Duan JA, Tao JH, Yan H, Zheng JB. Ecological distribution and elicitor activities of endophytic fungi in Changium smyrnioides. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs. 2010;1:121–5.
Rodrigues KF. The foliar fungal endophytes of the amazonian palm Euterpe oleracea. Mycologia. 1994;86:376–85. https://doi.org/10.2307/3760568.
Supaphon P, Phongpaichit S, Rukachaisirikul V, Sakayaroj J. Antimicrobial potential of endophytic fungi derived from three seagrass species: Cymodocea serrulate, Halophila ovalis and Thalassia hemprichii. PLoS ONE. 2017;8(8):e72520. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072520.
Gupta S, Kaul S, Singh B, Vishwakarma RA, Dhar MK. Production of gentisyl alcohol from Phoma herbarum endophytic in Curcuma longa L. and its antagonistic activity towards leaf spot pathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Appl Biochem Biotech. 2016;180(6):1093–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-016-2154-0.
Jin Z, Gao L, Zhang L, Liu TY, Yu F, Zhang ZS, Guo Q, Wang BY. Antimicrobial activity of saponins produced by two novel endophytic fungi from Panax notoginseng. Nat Prod Res. 2017;31(22):2700–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2017.1292265.
Katoch M, Pull S. Endophytic fungi associated with Monarda citriodora, an aromatic and medicinal plant and their biocontrol potential. Pharm Biol. 2017;55(1):1528–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2017.1309054.
Tanapichatsakul C, Monggoot S, Gentekaki E, Pripdeevech. Antibacterial and antioxidant metabolites of Diaporthe spp. isolated from flowers of Melodorum fruticosum. Curr Microbiol. 2018;75(4):476–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-017-1405-9.
Lu DD, Zheng DY, Chen J, Yang GE. Isolation of endophytic fungi from Loranthus tanakae and analysis of its secondary metabolites. Nat Prodï¼²es Dev. 2020;32:447–52.
Siebatcheu EC, Wetadieu D, Youassi YO, Bedine BMA, Bedane KG, Tchameni NS, Sameza ML. Secondary metabolites from an endophytic fungus Trichoderma erinaceum with antimicrobial activity towards Pythium ultimum. Nat Prod Res. 2022;37(4):657–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2022.2075360.
LópezLópez ME, DelToroSánchez CL, GutiérrezLomelí M, OchoaAscencio S, AguilarLópez JA, RoblesGarcía MA, PlascenciaJatomea M, BernalMercado AT, MartínezCruz O, ÁvilaNovoa MG, GonzálezGómez JP, GuerreroMedina PJ. Isolation and characterization of Trichoderma spp. for antagonistic activity against avocado (Persea americana Mill) fruit pathogens. Horticulturae. 2022;8(8):714. https://doi.org/10.3390/HORTICULTURAE8080714.
Zhang P, Zhou PP, Yu LJ. An endophytic taxol-producing fungus from Taxus media, Cladosporium cladosporioides MD2. Curr Microbiol. 2009;59:227–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-008-9270-1.
Firáková S, Šturdíková M, Múˇ cková M. Bioactive secondary metabolites produced by microorganisms associated with plants. Biologia. 2007;62:251–7. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-007-0044-1.
Rodriguez RJ, White JF Jr, Arnold AE, Redman RS. Fungal endophytes: diversity and functional roles. New Phytol. 2009;182:314–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x.
Zabalgogeazcoa I. Fungal endophytes and their interaction with plant pathogens: a review. Span J Agric Res. 2008;6:138–46. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/200806S1-382.
Zimmerman NB, Vitousek PM. Fungal endophyte communities reflect environmental structuring across a hawaiian landscape. PNAS. 2012;109:13022–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1209872109.
Zhang FS, Lv YL, Zhao Y, Guo SX. Promoting role of an endophyte on the growth and contents of kinsenosides and flavonoids of Anoectochilus formosanus Hayata, a rare and threatened medicinal Orchidaceae plant. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2013;14:785–92.
Xiao J, Zhang Q, Gao YQ, Tang JJ, Zhang AL, Gao JM. Secondary metabolites from the endophytic Botryosphaeria dothidea of Melia azedarach and their antifungal, antibacterial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic activities. J Agr Food Chem. 2014;62:3584–90. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf500054f.
Shwab EK, Keller NP. Regulation of secondary metabolite production in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycol Res. 2008;112:225–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.021.
Xue XZ. Metabolic differences of Cynomorium songaricum in different developmental stages and the relationship with dominant endophytic fungi. Shanxi University; 2020.
Bao GS, Song ML, Wang YQ, Liu J, Wang HS. Interactive effects of different densities of Pedicularis kansuensis parasitism and Epichloë endophyte infection on the endogenous hormone levels and alkaloid contents of Stipa purpurea. Acta Prataculturae Sinica. 2020;9:147–56. https://doi.org/10.11686/cyxb2019313.
China Pharmacopoeia Committee. Chinese pharmacopoeia, the first part. Beijing: China Medicine Science and Technology Press; 2020. p. 312.
Li YH, Lu D, Zhao MH, Zhu KX. Research on the developments and applications for medicinal plants of loranthaceae in Guangxi. Guangxi Med J. 2006;28:1695–8.
Gong B, Wu X, Wei T, Liao RQ, Su BW, Song JJ, Jiang GH, Zhu KX. Isolation, identification and antitumor activity of endophytic fungi in Taxilli herba from Salix babylonica in Guangxi. Guihaia. 2017;37:634–41.
Collado J, Platas G, Peláez F. Host specificity in fungal endophytic populations of Quercus ilex and Quercus faginea from central Spain. Nova Hedwigia. 2000;71:421–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2000.tb00760.x.
Arnold AE, Maynard Z, Gilbert GS. Fungal endophytes in dicotyledonous neotropical tree: patterns of abundance and diversity. Mycol Res. 2001;105:1502–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201004956.
Yuan ZL, Chen LQ. The role of endophytic fungal individuals and communities in the decomposition of Pinus massoniana needle litter. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e105911. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105911.
Wang JY, Li MQ, Li YR, Xu LX, Cao XY, Jiang JH. Research progress on diversity and biological function of endophytic fungi in medicinal plants. Biotic Resour. 2020;42:164–72.
Wang Y, Guo LD, Cheng HY, Zhao L, Chang F, Wan Y, Wang HP. Comparison of endophytic and soil fungi of Paris polyphylla diversity from different habitat. Microbiol China. 2020;47:2867–76. https://doi.org/10.13344/j.microbiol.china.200508.
Lü LX, Wang HW, Liang XF, Hao SJ, Du W, Zhu H, Dai CC. Effects of different chemotypes and seasonal dynamic variation on the species diversity of endophytic fungal communities harbored in Atractylodes lancea. Acta Ecol Sin. 2014;34:7300–10. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201303200468.
Shu YX, Luo M, Chen XY, Xiang MM, Dong Y, Dong ZY. Analysis of endophytic fungi diversity of Exocarpium citri Grandis in Guangdong province. J Zhongkai Univ Agric Eng. 2021;34:8–11.
Ren W, Yang R, Zhang YX, Tang M. Diversity of endophytic fungi in the roots of Cremastra appendiculata (Orchidaceae) at different altitudes in Taibaishan Nature Reserve, Central China. Mycosystema. 2021;40:1–16.
Yagame T, Funabiki E, Nagasawa E, Fukiharu T, Iwase K. Identification and symbiotic ability of Psathyrellaceae fungi isolated from a photosynthetic orchid. Cremastra appendiculata(Orchidaceae) Am J Bot. 2013;100:1823–30. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1300099.
Zhu HJ, Ouyang XY, Zhou Q, Gao BD. Isolation, identification and optimizing fermentation conditions of an antagonistic strain against Colletotrichum acutata. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica. 2012;42:418–24.
Xu LL, Zhao MY, Li J, Li SQ, Gao LJ, Zhang Y, Xu J. Correlation between vertical distribution of three Cypripedium species and composition of orchid mycorrhizal fungal community. Mycosystema. 2019;38:811–21.
Gupta S, Kaul S, Singh B, Vishwakarma RA, Dhar MK. Production of gentisyl alcohol from Phoma herbarum endophytic in Curcuma longa L. and its antagonistic activity towards leaf spot pathogen Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Appl Bioch Biotech. 2016;180:1093–109.
Feng H, Yang J, Zhao YC, Laborda P, Jia Y, Safdar A, Kange AM, Li BX, Zhou L, Zeng Q, Brown S, Fu ZQ, Liu FQ. Identification and characterization of a stem canker and twig dieback disease of pear caused by Neofusicoccum parvum in chinese mainland. Phytopathol Res. 2022;4(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S42483-022-00111-7.
Li GQ, Liu FF, Li JQ, Liu QL, Chen SF. Botryosphaeriaceae from Eucalyptus plantations and adjacent plants in China. Persoonia-Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi. 2018;40:63–95. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2018.40.03.
Shen YM, Chao CH, Liu HL. First report of Neofusicoccum parvum associated with stem canker and dieback of asian pear trees in Taiwan. Plant Dis. 2010;94(8):1062. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-94-8-1062B.
Yang XM, Wang JH, Zhang YP, Wang LH, Xie WJ, Cai YF, et al. First report of Neofusicoccum parvum causing stem canker and dieback in rhododendron in China. Plant Dis. 2015;99(8):1179. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-12-14-1346-PDN.
Liu YX, Shi YP, Deng YY, Li LL, Dai LM, Cai ZY. First report of Neofusicoccum parvum causing rubber tree leaf spot in China. Plant Dis. 2017;101(8):1545. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-17-0287-PDN.
Riccioni L, Valente MT, Di Giambattista G. First report of Neofusicoccum parvum causing shoot blight and plant decay on pomegranate in Tarquinia, Italy. J Plant Pathol. 2017;99(1):294. https://doi.org/10.4454/jpp.v99i1.3805.
Wang S, Lu J, Kang L, Xu D, Zhang S, Sun S, et al. First report of Neofusicoccum parvum as causal agent of wilting and stem rot of Santalum album in Guangdong, China. Plant Dis. 2016;100(3):651. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-15-0547-PDN.
Jiang XB, Tan XL, Tao NG. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity of postharvest pathogens in mang of ruit. J Xiangtan Univerdity (Natural Sci Editiong). 2022;44(2):12–20.
Aly AH, Debbab A, Proksch P. Fungal endophytes: unique plant inhabitants with great promises. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2011;90(6):1829–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-011-3270-y.
Fang ZD. Research methods on plant diseases. Beijing: China Agriculture Press; 1998.
Zhu GS. Establishment of a Rice Enhancer Trap Mutant Library by T-DNA Insertion.Wuhan:Huazhong Agriculture University. 2009.
Wei JC. Fungal identification manual. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers; 1979.
White TJ, Bruns S, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego: Academic Press; 1990. pp. 315–22.
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7:Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054.
Zhou SL, Yan SZ, Wu ZY, Chen SL. Detection of endophytic fungi within foliar tissues of Camellia oleifera based on rDNA ITS sequences. Mycosystema. 2013;32:819–30.
Pang XF, You MS. Insect community ecology.Beijing. China Agriculture Press; 1996.
Pielou EC. Ecological diversity. New York: John Wiley and SonsInc; 1975.
Death RG. The effect of patch disturbance on stream invertebrate community structure: the influence of disturbance history. Oecologia. 1996;108:567–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333735.
Kusari P, Kusari S, Spiteller M, Kayser O. Endophytic fungi harbored in Cannabis sativa L.: Diversity and potential as biocontrol agents against host plant-specific phytopathogens. Fungal Divers. 2013;60:137–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-012-0216-3.
Zhang SP, Xu T, Yang LQ, Song Y, Li XY, Zhang HW. Endophytic fungal communities of Stipa sp. roots in different types of steppes in northern China. Chin J Appl Ecol. 2014;25:3475–82. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140924.001.
Qiao YM. Research on the antagonistic phytopathogen constituent of endophytic fungi from the seeds of Sophora tonkinensis. Guangxi University; 2016.
The authors would like to thank Dr. Dev Sooranna, Imperial College London, for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.
This work was supported by the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 2021GXNSFBA075037 and 2022GXNSFAA035557) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81960695 and 82173933), the scientific research funding project of Guangxi Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants (no. GYJ202012) and the Multidisciplinary Innovative Team for Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangxi (no. GZKJ2305) as well as the Key Laboratory Construction Program of Guangxi health commission (no. ZJC2020003).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The endophytic fungal strains isolated from seven hosts (M. alba, P. salicina, P. chinense, B. purpurea, D. odorifera, D. kaki and D. longan) were kept in the plant Pathology Department of Guangxi Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants and we have obtained written consent from plant Pathology Department of Guangxi Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants to use these fungal strains in our research. The experimental methods conducted in this study complied with current Chinese laws and regulations.
Consent for publication
Conflict of interest
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Additional files 1
: Table s1 The isolation rates of endophytic fungi from T. chinensis of Fig. 1 raw data; Table s2-s3. The isolation frequency of orders (A) and genera (B) related to T. chinensis parasitized on different host plants from the raw data shown in Fig. 3A and B; Table s4. The diversity and distribution of endophytic fungi isolated from T. chinensis parasitized on different host plants from raw data in Fig. 4; Table s5. The antifungal activities of crude extracts from fermentation products of endophytic fungi from the raw data of Fig. 6; Table 5
Additional files 2
: Figure 2 raw data. Phylogenetic tree powerpoint
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Song, Ls., Huo, J., Wan, L. et al. Differences and biocontrol potential of haustorial endophytic fungi from Taxillus Chinensis on different host plants. BMC Microbiol 23, 128 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02878-x
- Plant endophytes
- Inhibitory activity
- Taxillus chinensis