Skip to main content

Evaluation of the mTORC activity in the presence of Toxoplasma gondii and azathioprine in human monocyte cell line

Abstract

Background

Autophagy is an important part of pathogenesis of IBD. Thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA) are approved drugs for clinical practices in IBD patients. Besides, as an escape strategy, Toxoplasma gondii can use the mTORC1 complex to inactivate autophagy.

Methods

In this study, we investigated whether T. gondii tachyzoites may modulate autophagy and interfere the effects of azathioprine in IBD treatment. PMA-activated human monocyte cell line (THP-1) was infected with fresh T. gondii RH tachyzoites. After 5 h of infection, the cells were treated with AZA for 6 h. The expression of atg5, atg7, atg12, lc3b, and β-actin (BACT) genes was evaluated using quantitative real-time PCR. To analyze the phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6), western blot using specific primary antibodies was performed.

Results

The results of real-time PCR revealed that AZA, T. gondii tachyzoites, and a combination of AZA and T. gondii tachyzoites upregulated atg5 gene for 4.297-fold (P-value = 0.014), 2.49-fold (P-value = 0.006), and 4.76-fold (P-value = 0.001), respectively. The atg7 gene showed significant upregulation (2.272-fold; P-value = 0.014) and (1.51-fold; P-value = 0.020) in AZA and AZA / T. gondii, respectively. The expression of atg12 gene was significantly downregulated in AZA and T. gondii tachyzoites for (8.85-fold; P-value = 0.004) and (2.005-fold; P-value = 0.038), respectively, but upregulated in T. gondii/AZA (1.52-fold; P-value = 0.037). In addition, the lc3b gene was only significantly changed in AZA / T. gondii (3.028-fold; P-value = 0.001). Western blot analysis showed that T. gondii tachyzoites significantly phosphorylated rpS6, and tachyzoites did not interfere the effects of AZA to phosphorylate the rpS6.

Conclusion

Taken together, although AZA and T. gondii similarly affects the expression levels of atg5, atg7, and atg12, but T. gondii does not seem to modulate the effects of AZA via mTORC functions.

Peer Review reports

Background

Autophagy is a cellular process, which scavenges and recycles unused proteins and damaged organelles [1, 2]. Autophagy is significantly involved in the systemic homeostasis of an organism [3]. This process is mainly modulated by AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and mammalian/ mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) [4,5,6]. The mTOR, as a master regulator of autophagy, activates the ATG1 complex [7], and AMPK (as a significant energy sensor) regulates autophagy via inhibition of mTOR signaling [8]. The mTOR is a member of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-related family, which regulates several cell mechanisms from growth and proliferation to recycling via autophagy [9,10,11]. However, rapamycin inhibits mTORC1 complex and strongly induces autophagy [12, 13].

Interestingly, autophagy also regulates the immune system and broad-spectrum of inflammatory cytokines [3]. Autophagy plays crucial role in pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease [14], cystic fibrosis (CF) [15], Huntington’s disease [16], cancers, and infectious diseases [3]. In addition, failed autophagy has been linked to numerous diseases, particularly autoimmune disorders, such as systematic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [17], rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [17], experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [18] and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) [19].

IBD is a gastrointestinal disorder, which is mainly categorized to crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) [20]. Regarding the critical role of autophagy in pathogenesis of IBD, modulation of autophagy seems to be a pharmaceutical target for resolution of inflammation during this autoimmune disease [21]. Thiopurines such as azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine, and 6-thioguanine, are currently approved drugs for clinical practices in IBD patients [22]. It was shown that thiopurines can activate autophagy by different mechanisms [23]. For example, AZA, as an immunosuppressive agent, not only inhibits purine synthesis in DNA/ RNA of B and T cells [24], but also may downregulate mTORC1, activates autophagy, and controls inflammation [25]. Similar clinical evidence [26, 27] supports the role of sirolimus (rapamycin), an mTORC1 inhibitor, in upregulating autophagy and improving the clinical manifestations of IBD.

Toxoplasma gondii is a cosmopolitan parasite that invades, survives, and replicates into any nucleated cell in humans and warm-blooded animals [28]. The evidence has demonstrated that autophagy is critically involved in protection against T. gondii in activated macrophage, as well as clearance of inflammation [29]. T. gondii employs many strategies to escape from the immune responses. As an escape strategy, T. gondii can use the mTORC1 complex and enhances S6K phosphorylation to inactivate autophagy and modulate host immune system [30,31,32].

Therefore, regarding the high prevalence of toxoplasmosis [33], the role of T. gondii in triggering of IBD [34], the crucial role of ATG5, ATG7, and ATG12 in lipidation of LC3-I to form LC3-II in autophagy process during the infection by T. gondii [35], and conflicting effects of T. gondii and thiopurines on mTORC1, we hypothesized whether T. gondii tachyzoites may modulate autophagy and interfere the effects of azathioprine during IBD treatment.

Methods

Ethical approval

This project was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (IR.SBMU.RIGLD.REC.1398.032).

T. gondii source

Tachyzoites of the virulent RH strain of T. gondii were prepared by the Toxoplasma lab directed by Dr. Seyed Tabaei (Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran). The harvested tachyzoites from the peritoneal cavity of infected BALB/c were washed with sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH = 7.4). In order to evaluate the viability of tachyzoites, samples were stained by trypan blue and counted using a hemocytometer.

THP-1 cell line

Firstly, THP-1 (human monocyte) cell line (ATCC: TIB-202) was cultivated in 25-cm2 culture flasks containing RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma, USA), 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma, USA), and 1% Pen/Strep (1% penicillin/streptomycin), and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 atmosphere. To differentiate THP-1 cells to M0 macrophages, 4 × 105 of cells were counted and transferred to a 12-well flat bottom plate, and incubated with 30 ng/ mL of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat No. sc-3576) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 36 h. Macrophage differentiation was microscopically evaluated by an inverted microscopy. Afterwards, supernatant and non-adherent cells were removed, and M0 macrophages were rested together with PMA- and LPS-free cell culture medium (RPMI medium with 10% FBS, without antibiotic) for 24 h at 37 C with 5% CO2 [36].

T. gondii and Azathioprine Treatment

Azathioprine (Imuran®) 6-(1-Methyl-4-nitroimidazol-5-yl) was in crystallized solid. To prepare the drug, AZA crystals were resolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (M2SO) and stored in -20˚ C. M0 macrophages were infected with 4 × 105 (multiplicity of infection [MOI] = 1) of fresh T. gondii RH tachyzoites. After 5 h of infection, the cells were co-incubated with 120 µM /mL of AZA for 6 h [25]. To compare the results, two separated wells of M0 macrophages were treated with only 120 µM /mL of AZA and T. gondii, respectively. A well of PMA-activated THP-1 without any treatment was considered as control. The treatment durations for AZA and T. gondii were adjusted 6 h and 5 h, respectively. All experiments were performed in duplicate.

Gene expression analysis

Total RNA was extracted from THP-1 cell line in each tested well using total RNA extraction kit (Yekta Tajhiz Azma, Tehran, Iran) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol [37]. Extracted RNA was purified by DNase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) treatment, and its concentration was calculated by NanoDrop (NanoDrop Technologies, USA). After adjustment complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using cDNA synthesis kit (Yekta Tajhiz Azma, Tehran, Iran).

To analyze the expression of levels of atg5, atg7, atg12, lc3b, and β-actin (BACT) genes, amplification of corresponded genes was performed using Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen, Germany) thermocycler. The reaction mixture of 20 µl contained 1 µL of each cDNA sample, 10 µl SYBR green qPCR master mix 2X (Ampliqon, Denmark), and 0.5 µL of each primer [37]. The final volume was adjusted by adding RNase/DNase-free water. The thermal cycling conditions consisted of an initial denaturation of 10 min at 95℃ followed by 40 cycles of 95℃ for 20 s, 59–61 °C for 30 s, 72℃ for 20 s and a final extension step at 72℃ for 20 Sect. [37]. The melt curve analysis was performed for each gene to rule out nonspecific amplifications. Relative expression level of each gene was compared to the β-actin gene, and results were analyzed using the 2− ΔΔCt method incorporated into the relative expression software (REST).

Western blotting analysis

To analyze the presence of rpS6 in experiment wells, total cells were lysed using the cell lysis buffer (Abcam; cat no.ab156034) supplemented with mini EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, cat no.4693159001). The concentration of THP-1 cells-derived proteins was measured using the BCA protein assay kit (Pars Tous; cat no. A101251). Protein concentration was adjusted and boiled at 100 °C for 5 min in the presence of a loading buffer. Then, equal volumes of protein extract were sperated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and then transferred to the polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. The blocking was performed overnight at 4 °C in 5% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBS-T (Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20). Samples were then incubated for 2 h with the specific primary antibodies (rat anti-human rpS6 antibody [R&D Systems; 1:1000, MAB54361-SP], and mouse anti-human/mouse/rat beta-actin antibody [Novus Biologicals; 1:1000; NBP1-47423]. To visualize the presence of proteins, secondary antibodies, goat anti-rat IgG antibody HRP conjugate (Sigma; 1:1000; AP136P) and goat anti-mouse HRP-conjugated antibody (Novus Biologicals; 1:1000; NBP2-30347 H), were employed. Rapamycine was employed as positive control. The expression of the proteins was visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Fusion Solo S, VILBER, France). Protein levels were analyzed with ImageJ software.

Results

Quantity analysis of atg5, atg7, atg12, and lc3b genes

The results of real-time PCR showed significantly changes of atg5 gene compared to the control. Accordingly, AZA, T. gondii tachyzoites, and combination of AZA and T. gondii tachyzoites upregulated atg5 gene for 4.297-fold (P-value = 0.014), 2.49-fold (P-value = 0.006), and 4.76-fold (P-value = 0.001) compared to the control, respectively (Fig. 1A).

Similar to the atg5 gene, the expression of atg7 gene revealed significant upregulation in THP-1 cells treated by AZA (2.272-fold; P-value = 0.014) and AZA / T. gondii (1.51-fold; P-value = 0.020) compared to the control, while T. gondii tachyzoites did not induce the expression of atg7 gene (Fig. 1B).

The atg12 gene was significantly downregulated in AZA (8.85-fold downregulation; P-value = 0.004) and T. gondii tachyzoites (2.005-fold; P-value = 0.038) and upregulated in T. gondii/AZA (1.52-fold; P-value = 0.037) (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, the expression changes for lc3b gene was only significant in M0 macrophage cell line cured by AZA / T. gondii (3.028-fold; P-value = 0.001), compared to the control (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The expression levels of A) atg5, B) atg7, C) atg12, and D) lc3b genes in THP-1 cell line co-incubated with T. gondii tachyzoites and azathioprine. * P value < 0.05; ** P value < 0.01; NS: not significant. AZA: azathioprine; ACTB: β-actin

Western blot analysis showed that T. gondii tachyzoites were significantly phosphorylated rpS6, while AZA did not phosphorylate the rpS6, as expected. In addition, T. gondii tachyzoites did not interfere the effects of AZA to phosphorylate the rpS6 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The westernblot analysis shows phosphorylation of rpS6 by T. gondii to activate mTORC and prevent autophagy formation. Dephosporylation of rpS6 at the protein level by azathioprine suggests the similar effects of azathioprine and rapamycin in activating autophagy. * P value < 0.05; ** P value < 0.01. AZA: azathioprine; Rap: rapamycin; rpS6: ribosomal protein S6; ACTB: β-actin; NC: negative control

Discussion

Autophagy pathway is modulated by the ATG proteins, which are initiated by vesicle nucleation. LC3/ATG8 and ATG12 are ubiquitin-like molecules, which plays central role in autophagosome biogenesis [37, 38].

Autophagy is able to directly participate in immune cell functions through regulating the secretion of cytokines and chemokines [39, 40]. Autophagy may regulate the IL-1β and IL-23 secretion to protect from autoimmune diseases [41,42,43]. Interestingly, polymorphisms through the il-1β and il-23 genes may lead to susceptibility to IBD [41, 44]. Additionally, autophagy-related protein 16 − 1 (ATG16L1), nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 [NOD2], immunity-related GTPase family M protein [IRGM], and leucine rich repeat kinase 2 [LRRK2] have been suggested as genetic susceptibility loci for CD based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS) [45,46,47]. Wittkopf et al. [48], showed that although granule formation of paneth cells was affected in ATG7-knock out mice, but depletion of only ATG7 did not disturb the immune homeostasis. Regarding the promising role of autophagy in control of IBD symptoms, modulation of canonical autophagy pathway via mTOR seems to be a treatment approach for patients with IBD [49, 50]. The role of sirolimus (rapamycin), as mTOR inhibitor and autophagy activator, was clinically investigated in amelioration of the IBD symptoms [27, 51]. In a case study, Massey et al., [27] evaluated the effects of sirolimus on a 37-year-old woman with refractory colonic and perianal CD for six months and reported a remarkable improvement in progress of the disease. Mutalib et al. [26], evaluated the effects of sirolimus in IBD patients (UC and CD), and suggested that inhibiting mTORC using sirolimus could be considered a rescue therapy, particularly in children with severe IBD refractory. The results of an experimental study by Hu et al., [52] in mice model supported previous findings and documented that inhibiting mTORC attenuates dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis. In addition, a single center study on 15 CD-related fibrotic stricture patients by Zhong et al. [53], demonstrated favorable effect of rapamycin in symptoms of IBD patients with CD-related stricture in upper gastrointestinal tract. Hooper et al., [25] demonstrated that AZA not only modulates the immune responses during the IBD onset, but also induces autophagy via inhibiting mTORC1. In the line of these studies, our findings showed that AZA induced the expression of atg5 and atg7, which are essential for formation of the autophagy complex [54, 55]. In addition, protein analysis showed that AZA induces dephosphorylation of rpS6 and subsequently autophagy progress.

The AZA is an immunosuppressant, which its role in immunomodulation during immune related diseases has well been established [56, 57]. The impact of azathioprine-associated lymphopenia on opportunistic infections was investigated that the findings showed lack of significant upper incidence of the infections compared to control group [58]. However, prescription of additional immunomodulation agents increased the risk of opportunistic infections in IBD patients [58]. Therefore, re-activation of T. gondii tachyzoites in IBD patients could be an important challenge. T. gondii employs strategies to survive and replicate inside host cells via avoiding from phagolysosome formation. Wang et al. [32] investigated the effects of T. gondii on host mTOR signaling and showed that T. gondii induces mTOR-dependent cell cycle progression and cell growth. Actually, T. gondii modulates mTORC and suppresses autophagy [59]. Notable, as an escape strategy, T. gondii, type I and II strain, may induce Akt activation followed by triggering epidermal growth factor (EGF), which results in mTORC phosphorylation and autophagy negative regulation [60]. This fact may explain the lack of expression in LC3 transcription in THP-1 cell line infected by T. gondii RH strain. Our findings represented that T. gondii in THP-1 cell downregulated transcription of atg12, while significant phosphorylation of rpS6 in protein level, in the line of previous studies, proposes deregulation of autophagy via mTORC manipulation by T. gondii [61, 62]. However, our finding suggests that although immunosuppressant medications prescribed in IBD condition can increase the risk of opportunistic infection and likely re-activation of latent toxoplasmosis, T. gondii tachyzoites are not able to phosphorylate mTORC and inhibit autophagy during AZA treatment in IBD patients.

The upregulation of atg5, atg7, atg12, and lc3b genes transcription in THP-1 cell line treated by both AZA and T. gondii tachyzoites was reported by our results. Actually, formation ATG5-ATG12 and ATG16 is critical for lipidation of LC3-I and establishment of LC3-II [63]. As finding, our results showed an increase in the expression level of atg5 gene. This finding is supported by previous studies indication upregulation of atg5 gene or its protein product upon invasion of T. gondii [64, 65]. However, the lack of significant upregulation of atg7 and lc3b, and downregulation of atg12 genes are mostly time-dependent. In this regard, Wang et al. [64], proposed higher production of lc3b gene after 24 h compared to 8, 4, and 2 h post-infection. The inconsistency between higher expression of atg5 in THP-1 cell line treated by T. gondii with rpS6 phosphorylation may support finding released by Wang et al. [64], indicating mTOR-independent autophagosome recruitment. In addition, in the current study the expression of ATG-related genes was investigated in transcription level and considering the lack of protein analysis, these results should be carefully interpreted. Interestingly, our finding showed that co-existence of AZA and T. gondii synergistically increase the expression of all studied ATG-related genes. As mentioned above, AZA increases the expression of ATG-related genes and induces dephosphorylation of rpS6 to provoke autophagy process.

Moreover, in the current study, we employed strain I, which is not suitable candidate to study reactivation of T. gondii; however, this strain is popular genotype, which has been investigated in autophagy studies [64, 66, 67]. Nevertheless, there is no data investigating the bilateral effects of T. gondii and AZA. Therefore, in vivo study of this bilateral effect of AZA and T. gondii, investigation of the communication between different strains (I, II, and III) and autophagy, regarding prescription of AZA, and repeating this study in different timepoints and cell lines could be an interesting field of study.

Conclusion

This study showed that T. gondii tachyzoites significantly phosphorylated rpS6, while they were not able to obstruct the autophagy activation by AZA treatment. Taken together, simultaneous treatment of THP-1 cell line by both T. gondii tachyzoites and AZA showed overcoming the effects of AZA in activation of autophagy. However, this is a preliminary study and further investigations in animal models and with different strains of T. gondii are needed to rule out the negative effect of T. gondii tachyzoites on autophagy activation upon prescription of AZA.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

References

  1. Česen MH, Pegan K, Spes A, Turk B. Lysosomal pathways to cell death and their therapeutic applications. Exp Cell Res. 2012;318:1245–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levine B, Klionsky DJ. Development by self-digestion: molecular mechanisms and biological functions of autophagy. Dev Cell. 2004;6:463–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HW. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature. 2011;469:323–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Z, Wilson Wayne A, Fujino Marie A, Roach Peter J. Antagonistic controls of autophagy and glycogen accumulation by snf1p, the yeast homolog of AMP-activated protein kinase, and the cyclin-dependent kinase Pho85p. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:5742–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Scott RC, Juhász G, Neufeld TP. Direct induction of autophagy by Atg1 inhibits cell growth and induces apoptotic cell death. Curr Biol. 2007;17:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Meley D, Bauvy C, Houben-Weerts JH, Dubbelhuis PF, Helmond MT, Codogno P, et al. AMP-activated protein kinase and the regulation of autophagic proteolysis. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:34870–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ichimura Y, Kirisako T, Takao T, Satomi Y, Shimonishi Y, Ishihara N, et al. A ubiquitin-like system mediates protein lipidation. Nature. 2000;408:488–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gwinn DM, Shackelford DB, Egan DF, Mihaylova MM, Mery A, Vasquez DS, et al. AMPK phosphorylation of raptor mediates a metabolic checkpoint. Mol cell. 2008;30:214–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Saxton RA, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease. Cell. 2017;168:960–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown EJ, Albers MW, Shin TB, Ichikawa K, Keith CT, Lane WS, et al. A mammalian protein targeted by G1-arresting rapamycin-receptor complex. Nature. 1994;369:756–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim D-H, Sarbassov DD, Ali SM, King JE, Latek RR, Erdjument-Bromage H, et al. mTOR interacts with raptor to form a nutrient-sensitive complex that signals to the cell growth machinery. Cell. 2002;110:163–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim YC, Guan K-L. mTOR: a pharmacologic target for autophagy regulation. J Clin investig. 2015;125:25–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin X, Han L, Weng J, Wang K, Chen T. Rapamycin inhibits proliferation and induces autophagy in human neuroblastoma cells. Biosci Rep. 2018;38:BSR20181822.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Terman A, Brunk UT. Autophagy in cardiac myocyte homeostasis, aging, and pathology. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;68:355–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Flores-Vega VR, Vargas-Roldán SY, Lezana-Fernández JL, Lascurain R, Santos-Preciado JI, Rosales-Reyes R. Bacterial subversion of autophagy in cystic fibrosis.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021;11.

  16. Rubinsztein DC. The roles of intracellular protein-degradation pathways in neurodegeneration. Nature. 2006;443:780–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou XJ, Lu XL, Lv JC, Yang HZ, Qin LX, Zhao MH, et al. Genetic association of PRDM1-ATG5 intergenic region and autophagy with systemic lupus erythematosus in a Chinese population. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1330.

  18. Shen D, Liu K, Wang H, Wang H. Autophagy modulation in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.Clin Exp Immunol. 2022:uxac017.

  19. Ke P, Shao BZ, Xu ZQ, Chen XW, Liu C. Intestinal autophagy and its pharmacological control in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Immunol. 2016;7:695.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fabián O, Kamaradová K. Morphology of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Cesk Patol. 2022;58:27–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng Y, Yu Y, Chen XF, Yang SL, Tang XL, Xiang ZG. Intestinal macrophage autophagy and its pharmacological application in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12.

  22. Teich N. [News on azathioprine in IBD]. Z Gastroenterol. 2013;51:1195–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Prins MMC, Giugliano FP, van Roest M, van de Graaf SFJ, Koelink PJ, Wildenberg ME. Thiopurines correct the effects of autophagy impairment on intestinal healing - a potential role for ARHGAP18/RhoA.Dis Model Mech. 2021;14.

  24. Tiede I, Fritz G, Strand S, Poppe D, Dvorsky R, Strand D, et al. CD28-dependent Rac1 activation is the molecular target of azathioprine in primary human CD4 + T lymphocytes. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1133–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Hooper KM, Casanova V, Kemp S, Staines KA, Satsangi J, Barlow PG, et al. The inflammatory bowel disease drug azathioprine induces autophagy via mTORC1 and the unfolded protein response sensor PERK. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25:1481–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mutalib M, Borrelli O, Blackstock S, Kiparissi F, Elawad M, Shah N, et al. The use of sirolimus (rapamycin) in the management of refractory inflammatory bowel disease in children. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:1730–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Massey D, Bredin F, Parkes M. Use of sirolimus (rapamycin) to treat refractory Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2008;57:1294–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kochanowsky JA, Koshy AA. Toxoplasma gondii. Curr Biol. 2018;28:R770–r1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu M, Cudjoe O, Shen J, Chen Y, Du J. The host autophagy during Toxoplasma infection.Front Microbiol. 2020;11.

  30. Mirjalali H, Shahrokh S, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Zali MR. Letter to the editor: activated Toxoplasma may attenuate the effect of azathioprine and deteriorate the symptoms in IBD patients via mTORC1 manipulation. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019;25:e137–e.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Heijnen HF, van Wijk R, Pereboom TC, Goos YJ, Seinen CW, van Oirschot BA, et al. Ribosomal protein mutations induce autophagy through S6 kinase inhibition of the insulin pathway. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004371–e.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Y, Weiss LM, Orlofsky A. Intracellular parasitism with Toxoplasma gondii stimulates mammalian-target-of-rapamycin-dependent host cell growth despite impaired signalling to S6K1 and 4E-BP1. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11:983–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bigna JJ, Tochie JN, Tounouga DN, Bekolo AO, Ymele NS, Youda EL, et al. Global, regional, and country seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in pregnant women: a systematic review, modelling and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020;10:12102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Egan CE, Cohen SB, Denkers EY. Insights into inflammatory bowel disease using Toxoplasma gondii as an infectious trigger. Immunolo Cell Biol. 2012;90:668–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Subauste CS. Interplay between Toxoplasma gondii, autophagy, and autophagy proteins. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:139.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Pazoki H, Mohammad Rahimi H, Mirjalali H, Niyyati M, Mosaffa N, Seyed Tabaei SJ, et al. Soluble total antigen derived from Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites increased the expression levels of NLRP1, NLRP3, NLRC4, AIM2, and the release of mature form of IL1β, but downregulated the expression of IL1β and IL18 genes in THP-1cell line. Microb Pathog. 2021;158:105072.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nemati S, Pazoki H, Mohammad Rahimi H, Asadzadeh Aghdaei H, Shahrokh S, Baghaei K, et al. Toxoplasma gondii profilin and tachyzoites RH strain may manipulate autophagy via downregulating Atg5 and Atg12 and upregulating Atg7. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48:7041–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lamb CA, Yoshimori T, Tooze SA. The autophagosome: origins unknown, biogenesis complex. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:759–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Münz C. Antigen processing via autophagy–not only for MHC class II presentation anymore? Curr. Opin Immunol. 2010;22:89–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Peral de Castro C, Jones SA, C NC, Hearnden CA, Williams L, Winter J et al. Autophagy regulates IL-23 secretion and innate T cell responses through effects on IL-1 secretion. J Immunol. (Baltimore, Md: 1950). 2012;189:4144-53.

  41. Amre DK, Mack D, Israel D, Morgan K, Lambrette P, Law L, et al. Association between genetic variants in the IL-23R gene and early-onset Crohn’s disease: results from a case-control and family-based study among canadian children. Am J Gastroenterol Suppl. 2008;103:615–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Song GG, Bae SC, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Lee YH. Associations between interleukin-23 receptor polymorphisms and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:10655–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee YH, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Song GG. Associations between interleukin-23R polymorphisms and ankylosing spondylitis susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Inflamm Res. 2012;61:143–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sivanesan D, Beauchamp C, Quinou C, Lee J, Lesage S, Chemtob S, et al. IL23R (interleukin 23 receptor) variants protective against inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) display loss of function due to impaired protein stability and intracellular trafficking. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:8673–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hampe J, Franke A, Rosenstiel P, Till A, Teuber M, Huse K, et al. A genome-wide association scan of nonsynonymous SNPs identifies a susceptibility variant for Crohn disease in ATG16L1. Nat Genet. 2007;39:207–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rioux JD, Xavier RJ, Taylor KD, Silverberg MS, Goyette P, Huett A, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies new susceptibility loci for Crohn disease and implicates autophagy in disease pathogenesis. Nat Genet. 2007;39:596–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Plantinga TS, Crisan TO, Oosting M, van de Veerdonk FL, de Jong DJ, Philpott DJ, et al. Crohn’s disease-associated ATG16L1 polymorphism modulates pro-inflammatory cytokine responses selectively upon activation of NOD2. Gut. 2011;60:1229–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wittkopf N, Günther C, Martini E, Waldner M, Amann KU, Neurath MF, et al. Lack of intestinal epithelial atg7 affects paneth cell granule formation but does not compromise immune homeostasis in the gut. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:278059.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Lashgari NA, Roudsari NM, Momtaz S, Ghanaatian N, Kohansal P, Farzaei MH, et al. Targeting mammalian target of rapamycin: prospects for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2021;28:1605–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lashgari NA, Roudsari NM, Momtaz S, Abdolghaffari AH. Mammalian target of rapamycin-novel insight for management of inflammatory bowel diseases. World J Pharmacol. 2022;11:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kellermayer R, Chang A, Patel K. Sirolimus (Rapamycin) induced mucosal healing in anti-tumor necrosis factor refractory pediatric ulcerative colitis, editors. JPGN Rep. 2022;3:e183.

  52. Hu S, Chen M, Wang Y, Wang Z, Pei Y, Fan R, et al. mTOR inhibition attenuates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis by suppressing T cell proliferation and balancing TH1/TH17/Treg profile. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0154564.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhong M, Cui B, Xiang J, Wu X, Wen Q, Li Q, et al. Rapamycin is effective for upper but not for lower gastrointestinal crohn’s disease-related stricture: a pilot study. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:617535.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hwang S, Maloney NS, Bruinsma MW, Goel G, Duan E, Zhang L, et al. Nondegradative role of Atg5-Atg12/ Atg16L1 autophagy protein complex in antiviral activity of interferon gamma. Cell Host Microb. 2012;11:397–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Huang J, Brumell JH. Bacteria-autophagy interplay: a battle for survival. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12:101–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Thomas CW, Myhre GM, Tschumper R, Sreekumar R, Jelinek D, McKean DJ, et al. Selective inhibition of inflammatory gene expression in activated T lymphocytes: a mechanism of immune suppression by thiopurines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;312:537–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Bracho-Borro M, Franco-Ruiz PA, Magaña M. The use of azathioprine in atopic dermatitis: a review. Dermatol Ther. 2022;35:e15665.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Vögelin M, Biedermann L, Frei P, Vavricka SR, Scharl S, Zeitz J, et al. The impact of azathioprine-associated lymphopenia on the onset of opportunistic infections in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0155218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Azzman N. Crohn’s disease: potential drugs for modulation of autophagy.Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55.

  60. Muniz-Feliciano L, Van Grol J, Portillo JA, Liew L, Liu B, Carlin CR, et al. Toxoplasma gondii-induced activation of EGFR prevents autophagy protein-mediated killing of the parasite. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Cheng A, Zhang H, Chen B, Zheng S, Wang H, Shi Y, et al. Modulation of autophagy as a therapeutic strategy for Toxoplasma gondii infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:902428.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Leroux LP, Lorent J, Graber TE, Chaparro V, Masvidal L, Aguirre M et al. The protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii selectively reprograms the host cell translatome.Infect Immun. 2018;86.

  63. Hanada T, Noda NN, Satomi Y, Ichimura Y, Fujioka Y, Takao T, et al. The Atg12-Atg5 conjugate has a novel E3-like activity for protein lipidation in autophagy. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(52):37298–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang Y, Weiss LM, Orlofsky A. Host cell autophagy is induced by Toxoplasma gondii and contributes to parasite growth. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(3):1694–701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Ohshima J, Lee Y, Sasai M, Saitoh T, Su Ma J, Kamiyama N et al. Role of mouse and human autophagy proteins in IFN-γ-induced cell-autonomous responses against Toxoplasma gondii. J Immunol. 2014 Apr 1;192(7):3328-35.

  66. Pan L, Yang Y, Chen X, Zhao M, Yao C, Sheng K, et al. Host autophagy limits Toxoplasma gondii proliferation in the absence of IFN-γ by affecting the hijack of Rab11A-positive vesicles. Front Microbiol. 2022 Dec;1:13:1052779.

  67. Dong K, Jiang Z, Zhang J, Qin H, Chen J, Chen Q. The role of SIRT1 in the process of Toxoplasma gondii infection of RAW 264.7 macrophages.Front Microbiol. 2022 Nov17;13:1017696.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all members of the Foodborne and Waterborne Diseases Research Center for their collaborations.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences with grant number: RIGLD-1060.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HM designed the study. SN and HMR contributed in performing the experiments. HAA and SS contributed in clinical consultation and reagents/facilities/instruments. AM contributed in western blot performing and analysis. HM and SN contributed in manuscript writing. All authors read and confirmed the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamed Mirjalali.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures employed in this study were according to the Ethical Review Committee of the Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (IR.SBMU.RIGLD.REC.1398.032).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nemati, S., Mohammad Rahimi, H., Meyfour, A. et al. Evaluation of the mTORC activity in the presence of Toxoplasma gondii and azathioprine in human monocyte cell line. BMC Microbiol 23, 77 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02819-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-023-02819-8

Keywords