Skip to main content
Download PDF

Occurrence of virulence factors and carbapenemase genes in Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from chicken meat and egg samples in Iraq

BMC Microbiology volume 22, Article number: 279 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Food-borne infections mainly due to Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) are major concerns worldwide. S. Enteritidis isolates may serve as reservoirs for spreading antimicrobial drug resistance genes including carbapenemases. This study aimed to screen the occurrence of virulence factors, carbapenemases, and antibiotic resistance genes in S. Enteritidis isolated from chicken meat and eggs in Iraq.

Results

In total, 1000 non-duplicated chicken meat and 1000 egg samples were collected during 2019–2020. Presumptive S. Enteritidis isolates were initially identified by standard bacteriology tests and then were confirmed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Carbapenem resistance was detected using the disk diffusion method. Virulence and carbapenemase genes were screened using the PCR method. In total, 100 (5.0%) S. Enteritidis isolates were identified from 2000 samples collected using phenotypic and molecular methods. These isolates were identified from 4.9% chicken meat (n = 49/1000) and 5.1% egg (n = 51/1000) samples, respectively. The most and the least susceptibility was found to gentamicin and ceftazidime antibiotics, respectively. The prevalence of different virulence factors were as follows: phoP/Q (40.0%), traT (30.0%), stn (22.0%), slyA (11.0%), and sopB (9.0%). Among 20 carbapenem-resistant S. Enteritidis isolates, the most predominant carbapenemase gene was blaIMP (35.0%, n = 7), followed by blaOXA−48−like (25.0%, n = 5), and blaNDM (10.0%, n = 2), while the blaKPC and blaVIM genes were not detected. The coexistence of blaIMP, blaOXA−48−like, and blaNDM genes was determined in two isolates. The prevalence of different antibiotic resistance genes were as follows: tetA (87.1%), tetB (87.1%), dfrA1 (77.6%), and sul1 (83.6%).

Conclusion

Considering the existence of carbapenem-resistant S. Enteritidis harboring different virulence and antibiotic resistance genes in chicken meat and egg samples, adherence to proper hygienic conditions should be considered.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Spread of human pathogens including Salmonella strains which carry various virulence and antibiotic resistance genes is a serious concern in Iraq [1, 2]. Salmonella species cause a large part of food-poisoning cases and with more than 2500 serovars rank the most frequent causative agents of food poisoning in both developed and developing countries [3]. Some serovars of Salmonella are pathogenic for humans [4].

There are currently two species of Salmonella, S. bongori and S. enterica [5]. Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) is a major causative agent of food-poisoning and gastroenteritis following consumption of meat, egg and milk with prosecutions of fever, abdominal cramps and diarrhea [5, 6]. There are various genes that associated with virulence of Salmonella located on either the chromosomes or the plasmid [6]. A number of factors contributed to Salmonella pathogenicity, including capsules, adhesions, flagella, and type 3 secretion systems (T3SSs) encoded on Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPIs) 1–5 [5, 7]. Some of the virulence genes include phoP/Q, stn, slyA, sopB, spvC, and traT [5, 7, 8]. The interaction of the bacteria with the host may be affected by the expression of these factors, which ultimately determine the course of the infection [7].

Over the past few years, the rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella strains have increased across the globe [2, 9]. Additionally, several studies have examined the circulation of resistance genes within Salmonella strains at the molecular level [9]. However, one of the challenges that is now being addressed worldwide and rarely studied in Salmonella strains is the prevalence of carbapenemase genes that cause resistance towards carbapenem antibiotics. Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria are serious public health concerns because of the lack of treatment options for these infections. While carbapenemase-producing bacteria are documented in clinical infections, carbapenemase positive Salmonella strains, especially those that have food origins, are reported on a sporadic basis [10]. Increasing carbapenem resistance among foodborne pathogens necessitates active surveillance for these bacteria in the food chain, since they may be transmitted both to humans and the environment. S. Enteritidis isolates may serve as reservoirs and vehicles for spreading of carbapenemase genes. Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamases (NDM), Verona integron-encoded metallo-b-lactamases (VIM), imipenem-carbapenemase (IMP), and carbapenem-hydrolysing oxacillinase (OXA) are among the carbapenemases that have been reported from food origin so far [11].

In Iraq, the occurrence of virulence factors and drug resistance genes in S. Enteritidis from food samples has rarely been studied. Hence, this study aimed to study the incidence of virulence factors and drug resistance genes in S. Enteritidis from food samples with focus on carbapenemase genes.

Materials and methods

Ethics

The present study was approved by the Technical Institute of Suwaria, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq. No human or live animal samples were examined in this study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Culture conditions and bacterial identification

This study was performed during an 8 month period from January to August 2018. In total, 2000 samples (1000 from fresh chicken meat and 1000 from eggs) were obtained from various chicken-producing centers (company products and traditional markets) in Baghdad, Iraq and rapidly transported to the laboratory for bacterial isolation. For chicken meat samples, 25 g was taken and homogenized and cultured into 225 mL trypticase soy broth containing 6.0% yeast extract (TSBYE) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 37 °C for overnight. Next, 1 mL of the cultured sample in the TSBYE was added into 9 mL of tetrathionate broth and incubated again. Then, 20 µL of this broth was cultured onto the xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD) agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and CHROMagar™ Salmonella (Becton Dickinson GmbH, Germany) for bacterial isolates. The shell of the egg samples was disinfected with alcohol 75.0%. After the removal of the egg shells, the yolks and whites were mixed, and 25 g of the mixed sample was processed same as the meat sample. The colonies that appeared as reddish with/without black center on XLD or light mauve to mauve on CHROMagar™ Salmonella were picked for further confirmation using the API 20E test strips (BioMerieux, France). The isolates that identified by API 20E were screened for the presence of sdfI gene (S. Enteritidis serovar specific gene) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with previously described primers (Table 1) [12]. The PCR was performed in a thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with following program: initial denaturation (95 °C for 10 min), 30 cycles of: denaturation (94 °C for 1 min), annealing (60 °C for 90 s), and extension (72 °C for 90 s), and final extension at 72 ˚C for 5 min. The PCR was performed in a final volume of 25 µL containing following items: 4.0 µL 10X PCR buffer, 1.5 µL MgCl2, 1.5 µL dNTP (Fermentas, USA), 0.6 µL of each primers F and R, 5 µL Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas), 1 µL DNA template, and 10.8 µL ddH2O. S. Enteritidis reference strain ATCC BAA-1587D-5™ was used as the positive control.

Table 1 Primers used for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of this study
Full size table

Antibiotic resistance patterns

The antibiotic resistance profile of S. Enteritidis isolates was performed on Mueller Hinton agar (MHA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using the disk diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [15]. The antibiotics ampicillin (10 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), cefoxitin (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), imipenem (10 µg), meropenem (10 µg), and gentamicin (10 µg) (MAST, UK) were used. Escherichia coli ATCC 25,922™ was used for quality control. Isolates that were resistant to imipenem, meropenem or both antibiotics were considered carbapenem-resistant and selected for the detection of the carbapenemase genes using PCR.

PCR screening of the virulence factors, carbapenemase, and some drug resistance genes

For DNA extraction, the isolates were cultured onto the trypticase soy broth (TSB) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) medium for an overnight. Next, the AccuPrep Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Bioneer, South Korea) was used for total genomic extraction according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Then, a multiplex-PCR (M-PCR) was performed for the detection of the phoP/Q, stn, slyA, sopB, and spvC genes using prior described primers (Table 1) (Fig. 1A) [8]. The M-PCR was performed in a final volume of 25 µL with similar conditions of sdfI gene. Although the amount of ddH2O added was 4.8 µL. To screen the presence of the traT gene, carbapenemase genes (blaIMP, blaOXA−48−like, blaNDM, blaKPC and blaVIM), and some other drug resistance genes including sul1 and dfrA1 (for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), and tetA and tetB (for tetracycline), conventional PCR was performed with similar conditions of sdfI gene using specific primers (Table 1) (Fig. 1B and C) [13, 14]. Positive control genes were prepared from previous strains harboring studied genes that were kept in our laboratory. DNA/RNA free water was used as control negative in each PCR run.

Fig. 1
figure 1

 A Multiplex-PCR for virulence genes. M: DNA ladder (100 bp); Lane 1: control negative: DNA/RNA free water; Lanes 2–7 and 10–12: isolates positive for phoP/Q gene (299 bp); Lane 8: isolate positive for phoP/Q (299 bp), stn (617 bp), and slyA (700 bp); Lane 9: isolate positive for phoP/Q (299 bp) and slyA (700 bp). B Simplex PCR for dfrA1 (367 bp) gene. M: DNA ladder (50 bp); Lane 1: control negative: DNA/RNA free water; Lanes 2: control positive; Lanes 2–4 and 6–9: isolates positive for dfrA1 (367 bp) gene; Lanes 5, 10, and 11: isolates negative for dfrA1 gene. C Simplex PCR for tetA (577 bp) gene. M: DNA ladder (100 bp); Lane 1: control negative: DNA/RNA free water; Lane 2: control positive; Lanes 3 and 5–8: isolate positive for tetA (577 bp) gene; Lines 4 and 9: isolates negative for tetA gene

Full size image

Data analysis

The data was analyzed and presented as descriptive statistics using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 20.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The chi2 test (or Fisher’s exact test if the numbers were small) was used to analyze the possible correlation between variables. If the P-value was smaller than the 0.05, the correlation was considered statistically significant [16, 17].

Results

Bacterial isolates

In total, 100 (5.0%) presumptive S. enterica isolates were identified from 2000 samples collected using phenotypic and API methods. These isolates were identified from 4.9% chicken meat (n = 49/1000) and 5.1% egg (n = 51/1000) samples, respectively. All isolates showed the 304 bp sdfI gene band in PCR and were confirmed as S. Enteritidis. There was no significant difference between the prevalence of S. Enteritidis in chicken meat samples with its occurrence in egg samples (P-value = 0.918).

Antibiotic resistance patterns

The resistance rates of 100 S. Enteritidis isolates were as follows: ampicillin (65.0%, n = 65), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (67.0%, n = 67), cefoxitin (68.0%, n = 68), ceftazidime (78.0%, n = 78), tetracycline (70.0%, n = 70), imipenem (20.0%, n = 20), meropenem (18.0%, n = 18), and gentamicin (0.0%, n = 0). The most and the least susceptibility was found to gentamicin and ceftazidime antibiotics, respectively. The majority of isolates (65.0%, n = 65) were simultaneously resistant to ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, and tetracycline and were considered as MDR S. Enteritidis. In total, 20.0% (n = 20) of isolates were carbapenem-resistant of which 18 isolates were simultaneously resistant to both imipenem and merpenem. These 20 isolates were further investigated for the presence of blaIMP, blaOXA−48−like, blaNDM, blaKPC and blaVIM genes.

Prevalence of virulence factors

The prevalence of different virulence factors were as follows: phoP/Q (40.0%), traT (30.0%), stn (22.0%), slyA (11.0%), and sopB (9.0%) (Table 2). The phoP/Q was the most prevalent virulence factor, while the spvC was not detected. There were no significant difference between the occurrences of virulence genes in isolates that were collected from chicken meat with those of egg samples (Table 2).

Table 2 The frequency rates of virulence factors among 100 Salmonella Enteritidis isolates in meat and egg samples
Full size table

Prevalence of carbapenemase genes

Among 20 carbapenem-resistant S. Enteritidis isolates, the most predominant carbapenemase gene was blaIMP (35.0%, n = 7), followed by blaOXA−48−like (25.0%, n = 5), and blaNDM (10.0%, n = 2), while the blaKPC and blaVIM genes were not detected. The blaIMP gene was detected in four meat and three egg samples, blaOXA−48−like was found in three chicken meat and two egg samples, and blaNDM was existed only in two meat samples. The co-existence of blaIMP, blaOXA−48−like, and the blaNDM genes was found in 2 (10.0%) isolates with meat origin.

Prevalence of other drug resistance genes

Among 70 tetracycline-resistant S. Enteritidis isolates, the prevalence of resistance genes was as follows: tetA (87.1%, n = 61) and tetB (87.1%, n = 61). Also, in the 67 trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant isolates, the prevalence of resistance genes was as follows: dfrA1 (77.6%, n = 52) and sul1 (83.6%, n = 56).

Discussion

Zoonotic pathogens including Salmonella serovars are commonly transmitted by chickens and eggs [18]. S. Enteritidis is an important Salmonella serovar which causes zoonotic infections. In this study, the total prevalence rate of S. Enteritidis in chicken meat and egg samples was 5.0%. The S. Enteritidis strains were isolated from 49 (4.9%) chicken meat and 51 (5.1%) eggs samples, respectively. In consistent with the current research, Xie et al. [19] from China, reported a very similar prevalence of Salmonella serovars (5.4%, n = 54/1000) in egg samples. Also, our findings were in line with the World Health Organization (WHO) data about Asian countries [20]. According to the WHO global foodborne infections network data, the prevalence of S. Enteritidis serovar contamination in poultry samples ranged from 5 to 93.7% in Asia and Europe and from 19.2 to 49% in Africa [20]. According to a report by Pijnacker et al. [21], between May 2015 and Oct 2018, 1209 outbreak cases of S. Enteritidis linked to food products including eggs were identified in 18 European Union (EU) and the European Economic Area (EEA) countries. In another study by Almashhadany [22] from Iraq, 7.1% (n = 16/225) of grilled chicken meat samples were positive for Salmonella species that was slightly higher than the current study. He reported that 12.5% (n = 2/16) of all isolated Salmonella species were S. Enteritidis [22]. In a study by Bahramianfard et al. [6] from Iran, 1.3% of egg samples were contaminated with S. Enteritidis that was lower than our observation. In Tunisia, a prevalence rate of 16.0% has been reported for S. Enteritidis in chicken carcasses [23]. Various countries have different hygienic control and management programs, which may explain the differences in S. Enteritidis contamination rates of food products [6]. The Salmonella species in infected poultry feces may contaminate the eggshells and penetrate the interior of eggs, causing bacteria to grow inside [18]. Another reason for these differences may be due to the detection method, sample size, and sample types.

In this study, more than 50.0% of S. Enteritidis isolates were simultaneously resistant against ampicillin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, cefoxitin, ceftazidime, and tetracycline and considered as MDR isolates. This MDR rate was higher than a previous report from Iran (27.0%) [6], but lower than reports from Egypt (75.7% and 100.0%) [18, 24]. However, in this study, imipenem, meropenem, and gentamicin were the most effective antibiotics. In a previous study from Iran, a lower resistance rates had been reported for ceftazidime (11.1%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (20.6%) [6]. In this study, the high resistance rate against third-generation cephalosporins such as ceftazidime may be explained by the presence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) enzymes which were not investigated [24, 25]. In recent years, ESBLs have spread among Salmonella species in different countries [24, 25]. The lower resistance rates against carbapenems including imipenem and meropenem in comparison with other antibiotic classes may be as a result of limited use of these antimicrobials in poultry farms that was consistent with previous reports from Bangladesh [9, 26] and Egypt [18].

Also, contrary to the current study, Gritli et al. [23] from Tunisia, reported a lower resistance rates against tetracycline (13.0%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (0.0%). However, they reported the gentamicin as one of the most effective antibiotics that was in parallel with our observations. The most common antibiotic used in poultry has historically been tetracyclines. Therefore, resistance can be occurred in a variety of ways in bacteria, including changing ribosomal targets, efflux pumps, and inactivating enzymes [23]. In this study, the presence of tetA (87.1%)/tetB (87.1%) and dfrA1 (77.6%)/sul1 (83.6%) genes may be contributed to the high resistance rates against tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, respectively. In line with our findings, in a previous study by Abou Elez et al. [18] from Egypt, high resistance rates were observed against ampicillin (100.0%) and tetracycline (88.0%). They stated that the presence of the tet genes may be responsible for this high resistance rate to tetracycline. In their study, the most S. Enteritidis isolates (84.0%, n = 21/25) harbored tetA gene, whereas the tetB gene was only found in 2 isolates [18]. However, in another report by Shittu et al. [27] from Nigeria, the tetA and tetB genes were not detected in any S. enterica serovars including S. Enteritidis isolates that was in contrast to our results. In another research by Siddiky et al. [26] from Bangladesh, tetA and sul1 genes were detected in 3.44% of S. Enteritidis isolates that was lower than our study. Arkali and Çetinkaya from Turkey [28] detected the sul1 and tetA with 57.8% and 34.4% proportions, respectively. Also, El-Tayeb et al. [29] from Saudi Arabia stated that tetA and dfrA1 were the most prevalent genes accountable for resistance to tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, respectively. Discrepancies among studies may be due to the difference in sample type, sample size, and antibiotic use pattern in different regions.

As a result of the presence of virulence factors and antibiotic resistance genes, microbes can become more pathogenic [9]. In this study, the phoP/Q gene was the predominant virulence gene (40%), followed by traT, stn, slyA and sopB with frequencies of 30%, 22%, 11% and 9%, respectively. However, the spvC gene was not detected in any isolate. The absence of spvC gene, which is encoded by a plasmid, is possibly due to the loss of plasmid among S. Enteritidis isolates. Contrary to the current study, in a previous report by Hai et al. [30] from China, more than 90.0% of the Salmonella isolates harbored stn and sopB genes. Also, Wang et al. [31] from China reported higher incidence rates for sopB (100.0%) and spvC (93.8%) genes among Salmonella serovars isolated from 120 retail meat samples, including chicken (n = 45), duck (n = 30), and pork (n = 45). In the prior studies from Iran [6], Tunisia [23], and Nigeria [27], the prevalence rates of spvC gene were 50.8%, 45.8%, and 59.1%, respectively. In line with our results, Khodadadipour et al. [32] from Iran detected the phoP/Q gene (33.3%) as the most prevalent virulence determinant in S. Enteritidis strains isolated from meat and egg samples. Also, they stated that all isolates were negative for spvC gene [32]. Takaichi et al. [33] from Indonesia reported prevalence rates of 60.0%, 86.0%, and 88.0% for slyA, phoP/Q, and sopB, respectively. Also, they did not identify the spvC gene that was in consistent with the current research. The stn gene was found in 100.0% (n = 25) of S. Enteritidis isolates [18] and 40.0% (n = 48/120) of the Salmonella serovars [34] in Egypt that was higher than the current study. Although the prevalence rate of virulence factors examined in this study was lower than in other countries, it cannot be concluded that our strains are less pathogenic. Because Salmonella serovars possess several virulence factors that were not investigated here. There is evidence that the high frequency of detection of virulence factor genes in Salmonella isolates highlights their importance in human health [31].

There is still a very low incidence of carbapenem resistance in Salmonella serovars as compared to other Enterobacteriaceae species [35, 36]. However, 20.0% (n = 20/100) of S. Enteritidis isolates were carbapenem-resistant in the current study that was higher than the previous reports from Argentina (0.0%) [7], Bangladesh (0.0%) [9], and Poland (0.0%) [12]. The sale of antibiotics without a doctor prescription in most pharmacies, self-administration of antibiotics, their suboptimal use in the agricultural and food industries can be possible reasons for creating this selective pressure for the spread of carbapenem-resistant strains. Hence, the presence of 5 carbapenemase genes (blaIMP, blaOXA−48−like, blaNDM, blaKPC and blaVIM) was investigated in these 20 carbapenem-resistant S. Enteritidis isolates. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study in Iraq that shed light on the prevalence of carbapenemase genes in S. Enteritidis isolates from chicken meat and egg samples. The PCR assay revealed the blaIMP (35.0%, n = 7) as the most predominant carbapenemase gene, followed by blaOXA−48−like (25.0%, n = 5), and blaNDM (10.0%, n = 2), while the blaKPC and blaVIM genes were not detected. The presence of carbapenemase genes in S. Enteritidis isolated from food products has been investigated in few studies [35]. So far, various occurrence rates of blaIMP, blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA−48−like, blaSPM, and blaVIM carbapenemase genes in Salmonella strains of food origin have been reported [35, 37,38,39]. Abdel-Kader et al. [37] form Egypt, detected the blaKPC gene in 5 of 13 S. enterica strains isolated from chicken giblets. However, blaOXA−48 and blaNDM genes were not identified [37]. In another study from Egypt, 2 isolates from chicken meat contained the blaOXA−48−like gene and two isolates harbored blaNDM but none of the egg samples were infected by carbapenemase-positive Salmonella serovars [39]. Ghazaei [37] from Iran, reported the presence of blaIMP (31.57%), blaSPM−1 (10.52%), and blaVIM (57.8%) genes in S. enterica strains isolated from poultry meat. Contrary to our findings, Gawish et al. [24] did not find any carbapenemase gene in S. enterica isolates. According to the results obtained in this study, it seems that more extensive studies focusing on food products are needed around the world to provide a more accurate estimation of prevalence of carbapenemase genes in Salmonella strains with food origin.

Limitations

The current study had some limitations due to lack of financial resources. This study focused only on poultry products and did not investigated other food products. The prevalence of ESBLs, AmpC, and other carbapenemases were not investigated. The carbapenemase genes were not sequenced. The clonal relatedness of carbapenem-resistant isolates was not evaluated. It is recommended to perform more in-depth studies in future to analyze the precise mechanisms contributed to the antibiotic resistance in bacterial isolates from food products in Iraq.

Conclusion

The current study was the first in Iraq to evaluate the prevalence, antibiotic resistance patterns, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance genes including carbapenemases of S. Enteritidis in the chicken meat and egg samples. A relatively high rate of MDR S. Enteritidis among the poultry products necessitate control of antibiotic usage in chicken farms in the studied region. Also, the emergence of virulent S. Enteritidis isolates carrying carbapenemase genes particularly blaNDM with resistance to last-line antibiotic resorts is a concern toward control and eradication of these isolates. Our data provides insights regarding the attention about environmental sources, particularly poultry role in the antibiotic resistance spread. One health instructions should be considered for the safe production of Salmonella-free food products for consumers.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included here and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

IMP:

Imipenem-carbapenemase

KPC:

Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase

MDR:

Multidrug-resistant

NDM:

New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamases

OXA:

oxacillinase

SPIs:

Salmonella pathogenicity islands

T3SSs:

Type 3 secretion systems

VIM:

Verona integron-encoded metallo-b-lactamase

References

  1. Albanwawy JN, Abdul-Lateef LA. Molecular detection of some of the Salmonella Typhi virulence genes isolated in the province of Babylon/Iraq. Ann Romanian Soc Cell Biol. 2021;25(2):675–85.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harb A, Abraham S, Rusdi B, Laird T, O’Dea M, Habib I. Molecular detection and epidemiological features of selected bacterial, viral, and parasitic enteropathogens in stool specimens from children with acute diarrhea in Thi-Qar Governorate, Iraq. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(9):1573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Abebe E, Gugsa G, Ahmed M. Review on major food-borne zoonotic bacterial pathogens. J Trop Med. 2020;2020:4674235.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson R, Mylona E, Frankel G. Typhoidal Salmonella: Distinctive virulence factors and pathogenesis. Cell Microbiol. 2018;20(9):e12939.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jajere SM. A review of Salmonella enterica with particular focus on the pathogenicity and virulence factors, host specificity and antimicrobial resistance including multidrug resistance. Vet World. 2019;12(4):504–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bahramianfard H, Derakhshandeh A, Naziri Z, Khaltabadi Farahani R. Prevalence, virulence factor and antimicrobial resistance analysis of Salmonella Enteritidis from poultry and egg samples in Iran. BMC Vet Res. 2021;17:196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Joaquim P, Herrera M, Dupuis A, Chacana P. Virulence genes and antimicrobial susceptibility in Salmonella enterica serotypes isolated from swine production in Argentina. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2021;53(3):233–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Soto SM, Rodríguez I, Rodicio MR, Vila J, Mendoza MC. Detection of virulence determinants in clinical strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis and mapping on macrorestriction profiles. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55(4):365–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siddiky NA, Sarker MS, Khan M, Rahman S, Begum R, Kabir M, Karim M, et al. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from chicken at wet markets in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Microorganisms. 2021;9(5):952.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao Y, Wen J, Wang S, Xu X, Zhan Z, Chen Z, et al. Plasmid-encoded blaNDM–5 gene that confers high-level carbapenem resistance in Salmonella Typhimurium of pork origin. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:1485–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Köck R, Daniels-Haardt I, Becker K, Mellmann A, Friedrich AW, Mevius D, et al. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in wildlife, food-producing, and companion animals: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(12):1241–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ćwiek K, Korzekwa K, Tabiś A, Bania J, Bugla-Płoskońska G, Wieliczko A. Antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation capacity of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis strains isolated from poultry and humans in Poland. Pathogens. 2020;9(8):643.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghasemian A, Mohabati Mobarez A, Najar Peerayeh S, Talebi Bezmin Abadi A, Khodaparast S, et al. Expression of adhesin genes and biofilm formation among Klebsiella oxytoca clinical isolates from patients with antibiotic-associated haemorrhagic colitis. J Med Microbiol. 2019;68(7):978–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Askari N, Momtaz H, Tajbakhsh E. Acinetobacter baumannii in sheep, goat, and camel raw meat: virulence and antibiotic resistance pattern. AIMS Microbiol. 2019;5(3):272–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 27th ed. CLSI supplement M100.Wayne, PA. 2017.

  16. Saki M, Seyed-Mohammadi S, Montazeri EA, Siahpoosh A, Moosavian M, Latifi SM. In vitro antibacterial properties of Cinnamomum zeylanicum essential oil against clinical extensively drug-resistant bacteria. Eur J Integr Med. 2020;37:101146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khoshnood S, Shahi F, Jomehzadeh N, Montazeri EA, Saki M, Mortazavi SM, et al. Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from burn patients. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2019;66(3):387–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abou Elez RMM, Elsohaby I, El-Gazzar N, Tolba HMN, Abdelfatah EN, Abdellatif SS, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium isolated from laying hens, table eggs, and humans with respect to antimicrobial activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Anim (Basel). 2021;11(12):3554.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xie T, Wu G, He X, Lai Z, Zhang H, Zhao J. Antimicrobial resistance and genetic diversity of Salmonella enterica from eggs. Food Sci Nutr. 2019;7(9):2847–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hendriksen RS, Vieira AR, Karlsmose S, Lo Fo Wong DM, Jensen AB, Wegener HC, et al. Global monitoring of Salmonella serovar distribution from the World Health Organization Global Foodborne Infections Network Country Data Bank: results of quality assured laboratories from 2001 to 2007. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2011;8(8):887–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pijnacker R, Dallman TJ, Tijsma AS, Hawkins G, Larkin L, Kotila SM, et al. An international outbreak of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis linked to eggs from Poland: a microbiological and epidemiological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(7):778–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Almashhadany DA. Occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella isolates from grilled chicken meat sold at retail outlets in Erbil City, Kurdistan region, Iraq. Ital J Food Saf. 2019;8(2):8233.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gritli A, Daboussi T, Moussa MB, Abassi MS. Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in chicken consumed in military cantines. J New Sc. 2015;S-INAT(12):908–14.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gawish MF, Ahmed AM, Torky HA, Shimamoto T. Prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Salmonella enterica from retail fishes in Egypt: a major threat to public health. Int J Food Microbiol. 2021;351:109268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Akinyemi KO, Al-Khafaji NS, Al-Alaq FT, Fakorede CO, Al-Dahmoshi HO, Iwalokun BA, et al. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases encoding genes among Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates in patients with typhoid fever from four academic medical centers Lagos, Nigeria. Rev Invest Clin. 2022;74(3):165–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Siddiky NA, Sarker S, Khan SR, Rahman T, Kafi A, Samad MA. Virulence and antimicrobial resistance profile of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars recovered from poultry processing environments at wet markets in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(2):e0254465.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Shittu OB, Uzairue LI, Ojo OE, Obuotor TM, Folorunso JB, Raheem-Ademola RR, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in Salmonella enterica serovars isolated from droppings of layer chicken in two farms in Nigeria. J App Microbiol. 2022;132(5):3891–906.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Arkali A, Çetinkaya B. Molecular identification and antibiotic resistance profiling of Salmonella species isolated from chickens in eastern Turkey. BMC Vet Res. 2020;16:205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. El-Tayeb MA, Ibrahim AS, Al-Salamah AA, Almaary KS, Elbadawi YB. Prevalence, serotyping and antimicrobials resistance mechanism of Salmonella enterica isolated from clinical and environmental samples in Saudi Arabia. Braz J Microbiol. 2017;48(3):499–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hai D, Yin X, Lu Z, Lv F, Zhao H, Bie X. Occurrence, drug resistance, and virulence genes of Salmonella isolated from chicken and eggs. Food Control. 2020;113:107109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang W, Chen J, Shao X, Huang P, Zha J, Ye Y. Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from retail meats in Anhui, China. Food Sci Nutr. 2021;9(9):4701–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Khodadadipour T, Amini K, Mahmoudi R. Evaluation of virulence and enterotoxin genes in Salmonella enteritidis strains isolated from‎ meat and egg samples by multiplex-PCR. J Food Microbiol. 2016;3(2):25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Takaichi M, Osawa K, Nomoto R, Nakanishi N, Kameoka M, Miura M, et al. Antibiotic resistance in non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica strains isolated from chicken meat in Indonesia. Pathogens. 2022;11(5):543.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Elkenany R, Elsayed MM, Zakaria AI, El-Sayed SA, Rizk MA. Antimicrobial resistance profiles and virulence genotyping of Salmonella enterica serovars recovered from broiler chickens and chicken carcasses in Egypt. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15:124.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Fernández J, Guerra B, Rodicio MR. Resistance to carbapenems in non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars from humans, animals and food. Vet Sci. 2018;5(2):40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ghasemian A, Mobarez AM, Peerayeh SN, Abadi AT, Khodaparast S, Nojoomi F. Report of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in Klebsiella oxytoca from Iran. Rev Med Microbiol. 2018;29(2):59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ghazaei C. Phenotypic and molecular detection of metallo-β-lactamase genes of Salmonella enterica strains isolated from poultry meat. J Epigen. 2019;1(1):14–8.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Abdel-Kader F, Hamza E, Abdel-Moein KA, Sabry MA. Retail chicken giblets contaminated with extended-spectrum cephalosporin-and carbapenem-resistant Salmonella enterica carrying blaCMY–2. Vet World. 2022;15(5):1297–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Kadry M, Nader SM, Elshafiee EA, Ahmed ZS. Molecular characterization of ESBL and carbapenenemase producing Salmonella spp. isolated from chicken and its public health importance. Pakistan J Zool. 2021;53(6):2289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This research was not sponsored and was conducted at personal expense.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agriculture, Technical Institute of Suwaria, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq

    Manal Hadi Ghaffoori Kanaan

  2. Optometry Department, Medical Technical Institute Al-Mansor, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq

    Zena Kassem Khalil

  3. Department of Veterinary Public Health, Food Hygiene, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

    Hawazin Thamir Khashan

  4. Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran

    Abdolmajid Ghasemian

Authors
  1. Manal Hadi Ghaffoori Kanaan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zena Kassem Khalil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hawazin Thamir Khashan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abdolmajid Ghasemian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.H.G.K. and Z.K.K. performed the work. A.G. wrote the main manuscript text. H.T.K. advised the study and finally approved scientific contents. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdolmajid Ghasemian.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Technical Institute of Suwaria, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq. No human or live animal samples were examined in this study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanaan, M.H.G., Khalil, Z.K., Khashan, H.T. et al. Occurrence of virulence factors and carbapenemase genes in Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis isolated from chicken meat and egg samples in Iraq. BMC Microbiol 22, 279 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02696-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02696-7

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us