Skip to main content

Isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria species from different water sources: a study of six hospitals in Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Purpose

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are ubiquitous bacteria that are naturally resistant to disinfectants and antibiotics and can colonize systems for supplying drinking water. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of NTM in the drinking water of six hospitals in Tehran, Iran.

Methods

Totally, 198 water samples were collected. Each water sample was filtered via a membrane filter with a pore size of 0.45 µm and then decontaminated by 0.005% cetylpyridinium chloride. The membrane filters were incubated on two Lowenstein-Jensen media at 25 °C and 37 °C for 8 weeks. The positive cultures were identified with phenotypic tests, and then NTM species were detected according to the hsp65rpoB, and 16S rDNA genes. Drug susceptibility testing (DST) was also carried out.

Results

Overall, 76 (40.4%) of the isolates were slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM) and 112 (59.6%) of the ones were rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM). The most common NTM were Mycobacterium aurum, M. gordonae, M. phocaicum, M. mucogenicum, M. kansasii, M. simiae, M. gadium, M. lentiflavum, M. fortuitum, and M. porcinum. Among these 188 samples, NTM ranged from 1 to > 300 colony-forming unit (CFU) /500 mL, with a median of 182 CFU/500 mL. In the infectious department of all hospitals, the amount of CFU was higher than in other parts of the hospitals. The DST findings in this study indicated the diversity of resistance to different drugs. Among RGM, M. mucogenicum was the most susceptible isolate; however, M. fortuitum showed a different resistance pattern. Also, among SGM isolates, M. kansasii and M. simiae, the diversity of DST indicated.

Conclusions

The current study showed NTM strains could be an important component of hospital water supplies and a possible source of nosocomial infections according to the CFU reported in this study. The obtained findings also help clarify the dynamics of NTM variety and distribution in the water systems of hospitals in the research area.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Due to their high cost, challenging treatment, and rising prevalence, infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) have attracted more interest in the medical and engineering industries during the past few decades [1, 2]. The NTM, also known as “environmental mycobacteria”, are common in soil, freshwater sources, public water supplies, and household dust and comprise numerous opportunistic diseases [3]. It is believed that most NTM infections result from human–environment interactions, such as the inhalation of contaminated particles and aerosols [4].

As bacteria live in the environment, changes in climatic circumstances are likely to have an effect on NTM. When the industrial revolution started, more greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, were released into the atmosphere. This has caused average temperatures on land and in the ocean to rise by about 0.2 °C per decade [5]. Both rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and average temperatures worldwide have ripple effects. Some of these changes are higher humidity, heavier rain and drought, more frequent and/or bigger natural disasters, longer warm seasons, and changes in the sea level [5]. Coastal areas are especially affected by climate change, and in the United States, many of these areas are the same places where most NTM infections occur, such as Hawaii, Louisiana, California, and Florida [3, 6].

Some critical characteristics that determine NTM survival should be known to speculate on how the likelihood of NTM infections might alter in future circumstances. The NTM have a lipid-rich outer membrane consisting of mycolic acids that provides them with several qualities that help them stay alive, such as being water-repellent, impermeable, and slow-growing [3]. The NTM, due to their hydrophobicity, have a tendency to develop biofilms on surfaces, such as water pipe walls. However, due to their negative surface charge, NTM can also adsorb into these surfaces [3, 7]. They have been observed to thrive in generally harsh environments, such as acidic, heated, oligotrophic, and microaerobic conditions [4, 8].

More than 200 NTM species are currently identified, and they can be grouped into two main categories, including slowly growing mycobacteria (SGM) and rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) [9]. The species with the greatest clinically relevance differ by region across the world and have altered over time [10]. Nevertheless, a number of SGM (Mycobacterium aviumM. xenopi, M. malmoense, M. intracellulareM. marinum, and M. kansasii) and RGM (M. chelonae, M. abscessus, and M. fortuitum) species are today of considerable clinical interest. M. gordonae, an additional significant slow-growing species, is common in drinking water supply but less frequently associated with disease [4].

As the number of cases of NTM disease keeps going up, global climate change speeds up, and population dynamics change, it is necessary to know as soon as possible how the risk of NTM infections might change in the coming decades [3]. In both industrialized and developing nations, NTM are among the main causes of opportunistic nosocomial infections in a variety of therapeutic settings; however, little is known about their isolation and detection in Iranian hospitals. Therefore, this study aimed to determine how common NTM was in Tehran’s hospital aquatic systems in Iran.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Within January 2022 and July 2022, a total of 198 water samples were taken from various sites of teaching hospitals in the Tehran, Iran. All six hospitals had similar departments, which were including emergency, men and Women internal, intensive care unit (ICU), coronary care unit (CCU), infectious, operating room, laboratory, dentistry, dialysis, and heart surgery. All water samples were chlorinated drinking water. The samples included tap water from the emergency department (n = 12), women's internal medicine (n = 6), men's internal medicine (n = 6), women's surgery center (n = 18), men's surgery center (n = 6), ICU (n = 24), CCU (n = 12), operating room (n = 12), laboratory (n = 10), dentistry unit water (n = 14), department of Infectious diseases (n = 24), hemodialysis center fluid (n = 36), angiography department (n = 14), and heater-cooler devices (n = 4). Each sample was prepared in a sterile glass container with a volume of around 500 ml (mL), brought to the lab in an icebox, and examined within 24 h.

Sample decontamination and culture

The processing and decontamination of all samples were performed as previously described [11]. Briefly, each water sample (500 mL) was filtered via a membrane filter with a pore size of 0.45 µm (Millipore, Bedford, United States of America) and then decontaminated by 0.005% cetylpyridinium chloride for 30 min at room temperature. The membranes were washed with sterile distilled water to remove excess residual decontamination substances and then were incubated on two Lowenstein-Jensen media at 25 °C and 37 °C for 8 weeks. Colony morphology, growth rate, and pigmentation were all monitored twice a week in the cultures. After growing, the presence of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in colonies was determined using the Ziehl–Neelsen staining. All positive samples for AFB were tested for phenotypic tests, including urease production, nitrate reduction, salt tolerance, arylsulfatase, tellurite reduction, niacin accumulation, tween-80 hydrolysistellurite, and semiquantitative catalase production, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention procedures [12].

DNA extraction and molecular identification

Total deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted using a DNA kit (SinaCloneBioScience, Tehran, Iran). Two specific primers, TB11 (5'-ACCAACGATGGTGTGTCCAT-3') and TB12 (5'-CTTGTC GAACCGCA-TACCCT-3'), were used to amplify a 441-bp fragment of the heat shock protein 65 (hsp65) gene. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were then sequenced [13, 14]. According to Adékambi and colleagues, two primers, F-(5'-GGCAAGGTCACCCCGAAGGG-3') and R-(5'-AGCGGCTGCTGGGTGATCATC-3'), were used to amplify and sequence a 750-bp specific region of the rpoB gene [15, 16]. In addition, a 1500-bp fragment of the 16S rDNA gene was also amplified from the isolates using the previously published primers pA (5'-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3') and pI (5'-TGCACACAGGCCACAAGGGA-3') [17, 18]. The PCR reaction for the hsp65, rpoB, and 16S rDNA genes was carried out in a total volume of 25 mL containing 0.125 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, Taq DNA Polymerase (1.5 U), 10 pM of each primer, 2 mM MgCl2, and 50 ng of DNA. PCR for the hsp65 gene was performed as follows: 94 °C for 4 min, 30 cycles of 94 °C for 40 s, 60 °C for 35 s, 72 °C for 60 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR for the rpoB gene was performed as follows: 94 °C for 6 min, 40 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 58 °C for 40 s, 72 °C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. PCR for 16S rDNA was conducted as follows: 95 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 45 s, 62 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 45 s, and final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.

Moreover, PCR products were purified with the AccuPrep® PCR purification kit (Bioneer, Seoul, South Korea). The PCR products were sequenced using an ABI Automated Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, United States) and the raw data were evaluated with the MEGA version 11.0 program (https://www.megasoftware.net/).

Drug susceptibility testing (DST)

The broth microdilution method was used to determine each drug's minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), which were then interpreted in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations [19]. The examined drugs included rifampicin, ethambutol, isoniazid, ofloxacin, capreomycin, ethionamide, streptomycin, ciprofloxacin, amikacin, levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, imipenem, trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, vancomycin, doxycycline, minocycline, and cefoxitin. The serial twofold dilutions of medicines ranging from 0.06 to 512 mg/L were prepared and added to Middlebrook 7H9 Supplement with the addition of 5% albumin-dextrose-catalase (ADC). All cultures were incubated aerobically at 25 °C and 37 °C following inoculation. The growth rate was assessed on the 3rd and 7th days for RGM and weekly for SGM up to 4 weeks. The MIC was the lowest concentration of antimicrobial drugs that inhibits observable growth. According to CLSI recommendations, susceptible, moderately susceptible, and resistant breakpoints were assigned.

Results

NTM species identification by phenotypic tests

The NTM strains were divided into two groups based on their growth rates. Overall, 76 (40.4%) of the isolates were SGM and 112 (59.6%) of the ones were RGM. Moreover, 38 (15.9%) and 80 (42.6%) isolates were photochromogenic and scotochromogenic bacteria, respectively. Totally, 62 (33.0%) and 126 (67.0%) of the isolates were grown at 37 °C and 25 °C, respectively. The most common strain identified by biochemical tests was M. gordonae (24 isolates), followed by M. kansasii (18 isolates), M. simiae (18 isolates), M. fortuitum (12 isolates), and M. chelonae (4 isolates). Biochemical tests could only identify 76 (40.4%) of the 188 isolates investigated in this study. The rest of the isolates remained unidentified. Totally, 128 (64.6%) of 198 water samples were positive for NTM species. Additionally, 59 (29.8%) samples were negative, and the remaining samples 11 (5.6%) were contaminated (Table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of water samples from hospitals in Tehran, Iran

NTM species detection by molecular tests

Table 2 shows the distribution of water samples in different sources from six hospitals in Tehran province. Based on molecular tests (hsp65, rpoB, and 16S rDNA genes), NTM isolates included M. aurum (28 isolates), M. gordonae (24 isolates), M. phocaicum (20 isolates), M. mucogenicum (20 isolates), M. kansasii (18 isolates), M. simiae (18 isolates), M. gadium (16 isolates), M. lentiflavum (12 isolates), M. fortuitum (12 isolates), M. porcinum (8 isolates), M. chelonae (4 isolates), M. florentinum (4 isolates), M. moriokaense (2 isolates), and M. novocastrense (2 isolates). Interestingly, in some samples, more than one mycobacterial species was isolated; for example, three strains, including M. mucogenicum, M. gordonae, and M. novocastrense, were isolated from one of the samples.

Table 2 Results of NTM identification by molecular test in different temperature

SGM and RGM strains have been isolated in all hospitals. Colony-forming unit (CFU) were enumerated in all samples from which NTM were isolated. Among these 188 samples, NTM ranged from 1 to > 300 CFU/500 mL, with a median of 182 CFU/500 mL. In the infectious department of all hospitals, the amount of CFU was higher than in other parts of the hospitals (Supplementary Table 1).

Results of DST for most common NTM

Table 3 shows the MICs, the MIC50 and MIC90, and the interpretation of antimicrobial drugs against NTM isolates. The most resistant profile among the M. aurum isolates were for cefoxitin (57.1%), imipenem (42.6%), ciprofloxacin (42.6%), and moxifloxacin (39.1%), respectively. The highest resistance among M. phocaicum isolates was related to ciprofloxacin (80.0%), doxycycline (50.0%), and tobramycin (50.0%).

Table 3 Antimycobacterial susceptibility testing results for environmental isolates

The highest resistance patterns among the M. mucogenicum were for doxycycline (25.0%) and meropenem (25.0%) and among M. fortuitum isolates was for doxycycline (83.8%), cefoxitin (58.4%), and imipenem (50.5%).

Among the 18 isolates of M. kansasii, 66.7% isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin and rifampicin and all M. simiae strains were resistant to isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, clarithromycin, and streptomycin.

Discussion

The NTM are one type of bacteria that are thought to be opportunistic plumbing pathogens. Direct and indirect exposure to tap water in healthcare settings has been linked to the outbreaks of healthcare-associated diseases and even mortality. Consequently, water management systems are crucial components of both facility management and infection control strategies [20, 21].

In this study, both phenotypic and molecular methods were used to find and identify NTM species in water samples from six hospitals. The AFB was observed in 128 (64.6%) of the samples, 59.6% and 40.4% of which were RGM and SGM strains, respectively. The recovery rate in this study is higher than what other studies of hospital water have shown in Iran [22, 23]. The prevalence of RGM and SGM isolates in hospital water samples in Iran ranged from 42.2%-67.5% and 32.5%-57.7%, respectively. It seems that the frequency of RGM is higher than SGM in Iran. It should be noted that NTMs geographic distribution differs by region [23, 24].

The most common SGM isolates were M. lentiflavum (84.7%), M. avium complex (2.8%-56.4%), and M. gordonae (2.8%-56.3%); nevertheless, the most common RGM isolates were M. fortuitum (2.9%-44.2%), M. chelonae (8%-36.8%), and M. mucogenicum (8%-25.6%) [24].

The present study showed that the most prevalent NTM isolated from hospital water were M. aurumM. gordonaeM. phocaicum, M. kansasii, M. simiae, M. gadium, M. mucogenicum, M. lentiflavum, and M. fortuitum. Although some mycobacteria, such as M. lentiflavum and M. gordonae, are thought to be non-pathogenic, there have been reports of infections produced by these bacteria [16, 25].

Despite the fact that a large percentage of NTM species have been discovered from drinking water distribution systems in Finland (between 30–80%), France (72%), Australia (62%), and Germany (57%), the chemical and microbiological properties of these samples have not been published [26, 27].

It has been discovered that water meters, which are often located at the most distant point of the distribution system, harbor biofilms that are infected with mycobacteria [28]. In this context, the species M. gordonae, M. aurum, M. terrae, M. avium, M. shimoidei, M. haemophilum, M. marinum, and M. intracellulare have been extracted from water meter biofilm samples.

Chlorination is the most commonly used disinfection procedure, and the most chlorine-releasing chemicals are mycobacteriocidal. However, mycobacteria are quite resistant to most disinfectants due to their complex cell wall [29]. For example, the data showed that M. chelonae and M. fortuitum were more resistant; nevertheless, M. aurum seemed to be the most sensitive mycobacterial species to chlorine. However, the chlorine resistance rates of M. aurum and M. gordonae are 100 and 330 times greater than Escherichia coli, respectively [30].

Some of the NTM species isolated in this study including M. mucogenicum, M. kansasii, M. simiae, and M. fortuitum, were potentially pathogenic to humans. It has been reported that several NTM species have been correlated with waterborne transmission of human illness, including M fortuitum, M. marinum, M. ulcerans, M. chelonae, M. abscessus, M kansasii, M ulcerans, M. szulgai, M. phocaicum, and M. simiae. The number of potentially harmful mycobacterial species whose transmission route is related to water has increased. This finding is partly due to exposures in workplaces and institutions that led to respiratory diseases that were previously undiagnosed. Undoubtedly, as epidemiology and surveillance methods advance, more species will appear as water-related illnesses [23, 26, 31].

In the current study, the highest amount of CFU (> 300 CFU/500 mL) among NTM strains were detected in the department of Infectious diseases, women's surgery center (NTM ranged from 50 to > 300 CFU/500 mL), heart surgery (NTM ranged from 10 to > 300 CFU/500 mL), and ICU (NTM ranged from 5 to > 300 CFU/500 mL), respectively. Infections caused by NTM that are unrelated to cardiothoracic surgery are not generally considered to be a public health concern [32]. However, to prevent the further spread of the disease, research should be conducted on the healthcare-related transmission of NTM infections and healthcare-related hypersensitive lung disease from indoor stagnant water sources and surgical operations involving exposure to NTM-contaminated liquid. On account of reports of infections caused by other mycobacterial species related to M. chimaera, a general recommendation is to avoid using tap water or ice derived from tap water when manipulating intravenous catheters and endoscopes or using them in the operating room, particularly during cardiac surgery and during mammoplasty [33, 34].

Hemodialysis patients face a serious health risk when hemodialysis fluid is contaminated with whole bacteria cells or their pieces. In this study, from 36 hemodialysis water samples, 12 NTM species (ranged from 1 to > 300 CFU/500 mL), including M. gordonaeM. phocaicumM. mucogenicum, M. chelonaeM. lentiflavum, and M. simiae, were isolated. High rates of contamination in dialysis water fluid were observed in various medical settings, which is consistent with the findings of the current study. Nine hospitals in Japan's hemodialysis centers reported significant dialysate contamination rates. Of the 40 dialysate samples that were examined, 42.5% had bacterial counts that were higher than 2000 CFU/mL, which was higher than the recommended level [35]. In a related study carried out in Brazil, 19 hemodialysis machines were used to identify 11 mycobacterial species, including M. lentiflavum, M. gordonae, M. kansasii, and M. gastri [36]. Furthermore, in a recent Iranian study, several NTM species, including M. fortuitum, M. gordonae, M. mucogenicum, M. abscessus, M. chelonae, M. simiae, and M. kansasii were detected in 65 samples originating from the hemodialysis distribution system [37].

The DST finding in this study indicated the diversity of resistant to different drugs. Among RGM, M. mucogenicum was the most susceptible isolate, however, M. fortuitum, M. aurum, and M. phocaicum showed a different resistance patterns. Additionally, among SGM isolates, M. kansasii and M. simiae, the diversity of DST indicated. This result was in consistent with the results of a study on pathogenic NTM in patients with pulmonary disease [18]. Since the individuals who are generally susceptible to NTMs have an underlying disease, it can be problematic for these individuals to be infected with NTMs with various types of drug resistance. However, the evaluation of drug resistance in NTM strains isolated from the environment can be effective in infection control.

The present study has some limitations. The sampling duration was short (only in summer) and did not encompass the entire seasonal variation that may occur in Iran. In addition, this study did not examine the mechanism underlying the resistance of NTM to the individual tested antimicrobial agents.

In conclusion, this report was a contribution toward the improvement of understanding regarding the presence of NTM in the water of six hospitals in Tehran. Further studies are required to determine the presence, abundance, and infection ability of NTM in plumbing systems from hospitals that host vulnerable populations, such as immunocompromised, children, and elderly cases. Furthermore, in such facilities, education and more advanced treatment techniques should be employed to inactivate NTM and other opportunistic waterborne diseases.

Availability of data and materials

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and supplementary file. The nucleotide sequence data are available in the GenBank databases under the accession numbers OP580654 to OP580841 for the 16S rDNA, OP598205 to OP598392 for hsp68, and OP598393 to OP598580 for rpoB genes.

References

  1. Collier SA, Deng L, Adam EA, Benedict KM, Beshearse EM, Blackstock AJ, Bruce BB, Derado G, Edens C, Fullerton KE. Estimate of burden and direct healthcare cost of infectious waterborne disease in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(1):140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ratnatunga CN, Lutzky VP, Kupz A, Doolan DL, Reid DW, Field M, Bell SC, Thomson RM, Miles JJ. The rise of non-tuberculosis mycobacterial lung disease. Frontiers Immunol. 2020;11:303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blanc S, Robinson D, Fahrenfeld N. Potential for nontuberculous mycobacteria proliferation in natural and engineered water systems due to climate change: A literature review. City and Environment Interactions. 2021;11:100070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Falkinham JO 3rd. Ecology of nontuberculous mycobacteria--where do human infections come from? Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;34(1):95-102.

  5. Allen M, Antwi-Agyei P, Aragon-Durand F, Babiker M, Bertoldi P, Bind M, Brown S, Buckeridge M, Camilloni I, Cartwright A. Technical Summary: Global Warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C above pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneve, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2019.

  6. Strollo SE, Adjemian J, Adjemian MK, Prevots DR. The burden of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial disease in the United States. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015;12(10):1458–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lytle D, Frietch C, Covert T. Electrophoretic mobility of Mycobacterium avium complex organisms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(9):5667–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu J, Liu R, Cao N, Yu J, Liu X, Yu Z. Mycobacterial metabolic characteristics in a water meter biofilm revealed by metagenomics and metatranscriptomics. Water Res. 2019;153:315–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Daley CL, Iaccarino JM, Lange C, Cambau E, Wallace RJ Jr, Andrejak C, Böttger EC, Brozek J, Griffith DE, Guglielmetti L. Treatment of nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease: an official ATS/ERS/ESCMID/IDSA clinical practice guideline. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(4):e1–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoefsloot W, Van Ingen J, Andrejak C, Ängeby K, Bauriaud R, Bemer P, Beylis N, Boeree MJ, Cacho J, Chihota V. The geographic diversity of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from pulmonary samples: an NTM-NET collaborative study. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(6):1604–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schulze-Röbbecke R, Weber A, Fischeder R. Comparison of decontamination methods for the isolation of mycobacteria from drinking water samples. J Microbiol Methods. 1991;14(3):177–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kent PT, Kubica GP. Public health mycobacteriology: a guide for the level III laboratory. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1985:25.

  13. Ringuet H, Akoua-Koffi C, Honore S, Varnerot A, Vincent V, Berche P, Gaillard J, Pierre-Audigier C. hsp65 sequencing for identification of rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(3):852–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saifi M, Jabbarzadeh E, Bahrmand A, Karimi A, Pourazar S, Fateh A, Masoumi M, Vahidi E. HSP65-PRA identification of non-tuberculosis mycobacteria from 4892 samples suspicious for mycobacterial infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(8):723–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Adékambi T, Colson P, Drancourt M. rpoB-based identification of nonpigmented and late-pigmenting rapidly growing mycobacteria. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(12):5699–708.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Davari M, Irandoost M, Sakhaee F, Vaziri F, Sepahi AA, Rahimi Jamnani F, Siadat SD, Fateh A. Genetic diversity and prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from clinical samples in Tehran. Iran Microbial Drug Resistance. 2019;25(2):264–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogall T, Flohr T, Böttger EC. Differentiation of Mycobacterium species by direct sequencing of amplified DNA. Microbiology. 1990;136(9):1915–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mortazavi Z, Bahrmand A, Sakhaee F, Doust RH, Vaziri F, Siadat SD, Fateh A. Evaluating the clinical significance of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from respiratory samples in Iran: an often overlooked disease. Infection and drug resistance. 1917;2019:12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Woods GL, Brown-Elliott BA, Conville PS, et al. Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacteria, Nocardiae, and Other Aerobic Actinomycetes [Internet]. 2nd edition. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2011 Mar. (CLSI publication / Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, No. 31.5.) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544374/.

  20. Perkins KM, Reddy SC, Fagan R, Arduino MJ, Perz JF. Investigation of healthcare infection risks from water-related organisms: Summary of CDC consultations, 2014–2017. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019;40(6):621–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Falkinham JO III, Hilborn ED, Arduino MJ, Pruden A, Edwards MA. Epidemiology and ecology of opportunistic premise plumbing pathogens: Legionella pneumophila, Mycobacterium avium, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ Health Perspect. 2015;123(8):749–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moghim S, Sarikhani E, Esfahani BN, Faghri J. Identification of nontuberculous mycobacteria species isolated from water samples using phenotypic and molecular methods and determination of their antibiotic resistance patterns by E-test method, in Isfahan. Iran Iranian J Basic Med Sci. 2012;15(5):1076.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Khosravi AD, Hashemi Shahraki A, Hashemzadeh M, Sheini Mehrabzadeh R, Teimoori A. Prevalence of non-tuberculous mycobacteria in hospital waters of major cities of Khuzestan Province. Iran Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016;6:42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Arfaatabar M, Karami P, Khaledi A. An update on prevalence of slow-growing mycobacteria and rapid-growing mycobacteria retrieved from hospital water sources in Iran–a systematic review. Germs. 2021;11(1):97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nour-Neamatollahie A, Ebrahimzadeh N, Siadat SD, Vaziri F, Eslami M, Sepahi AA, Khanipour S, Masoumi M, Sakhaee F, Jajin MG. Distribution of non-tuberculosis mycobacteria strains from suspected tuberculosis patients by heat shock protein 65 PCR–RFLP. Saudi journal of biological sciences. 2017;24(6):1380–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Perez-Martinez I, Aguilar-Ayala DA, Fernandez-Rendon E, Carrillo-Sanchez AK, Helguera-Repetto AC, Rivera-Gutierrez S, Estrada-Garcia T, Cerna-Cortes JF, Gonzalez-y-Merchand JA. Occurrence of potentially pathogenic nontuberculous mycobacteria in Mexican household potable water: a pilot study. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van der Wielen PW, van der Kooij D. Nontuberculous mycobacteria, fungi, and opportunistic pathogens in unchlorinated drinking water in The Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(3):825–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Falkinham JO III, Norton CD, LeChevallier MW. Factors influencing numbers of Mycobacterium avium, Mycobacterium intracellulare, and other mycobacteria in drinking water distribution systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(3):1225–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tarashi S, Siadat SD, Fateh A. Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Resistance to Antibiotics and Disinfectants: Challenges Still Ahead. BioMed Res Int. 2022;2022:8168750.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Le Dantec C, Duguet J-P, Montiel A, Dumoutier N, Dubrou S, Vincent V. Chlorine disinfection of atypical mycobacteria isolated from a water distribution system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(3):1025–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dávalos AF, Garcia PK, Montoya-Pachongo C, Rengifo A, Guerrero D, Díaz-Ordoñez L, Díaz G, Ferro BE. Identification of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Drinking Water in Cali, Colombia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(16):8451.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Reich JM, Johnson RE. Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease presenting as an isolated lingular or middle lobe pattern: the Lady Windermere syndrome. Chest. 1992;101(6):1605–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Esteban J, García-Coca M. Mycobacterium biofilms. Front Microbiol. 2018;8:2651.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Monticelli J, Antonello RM, Luzzati R, Gabrielli M, Ferrarese M, Codecasa L, Di Bella S, Giacobbe DR. Mycobacterium chimaera infections: An update. J Infect Chemother. 2020;26(3):199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Oie S, Kamiya A, Yoneda I, Uchiyama K, Tsuchida M, Takai K, Naito K. Microbial contamination of dialysate and its prevention in haemodialysis units. J Hosp Infect. 2003;54(2):115–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Montanari LB, Sartori FG. Cardoso MJdO, Varo SD, Pires RH, Leite CQF, Prince K, Martins CHG: Microbiological contamination of a hemodialysis center water distribution system. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2009;51:37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Maleki MR, Moaddab SR, Kafil HS. Hemodialysis waters as a source of potentially pathogenic mycobacteria (PPM). Desalin Water Treat. 2019;152:168–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all the personnel of Mycobacteriology and Pulmonary Research Department, Pasteur Institute of Iran for their assistance in this project.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SM, MM and FS: Sample collection and performed the experiments; ADM, MM, and FN: Data acquisition and manuscript preparation; SM and SDS: analyzed data and interpreted data; AF: designed and supervised study, interpreted data, read and approved manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Farshad Nojoomi or Abolfazl Fateh.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project was performed to be in accordance to the ethical principles and the national norms and standards for conducting Medical Research in Iran (IR.AJAUMS.REC.1400.212).

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary Table 1. the frequency of NTM isolates and CFU in six-hospitals.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moghaddam, S., Nojoomi, F., Dabbagh Moghaddam, A. et al. Isolation of nontuberculous mycobacteria species from different water sources: a study of six hospitals in Tehran, Iran. BMC Microbiol 22, 261 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02674-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02674-z

Keywords