Skip to main content
Download PDF

Quantitative and qualitative characterization of commercially available oral suspension of probiotic products containing Bacillus Clausii spores

BMC Microbiology volume 22, Article number: 217 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Probiotics contain beneficial live bacteria that confer several health benefits to the host. For the past 50 years, spore-forming Bacillus species have been used in the form of probiotics. Among these, Bacillus clausii strains are used for the management of acute and antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. In the present work, we have evaluated the asserted label information on randomly chosen commercial Bacillus clausii spore suspension of probiotic products. The quality and number of viable bacteria were evaluated based on the colony count, antibiotic resistance, and hemolytic activity assays. The colony fingerprinting and 16S rRNA gene-sequencing techniques were used to confirm the presence of a univariate strain (Bacillus clausii). Our results corroborated the label count of 2 × 109 CFU/5 mL in BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, and TUFPRO® products. However, vegetative spore count was not found to match with the given label count in BENEGUT®, PROALANA-B®, β-LOCK®, and PROCILLUS® Bacillus clausii brands. In the hemolytic activity assay, except for β-LOCK®, the other 6 products showed gamma-hemolysis activity. Bacillus clausii isolated from all 7 probiotic products demonstrated resistance to several broad-spectrum antibiotics. The 16S rRNA gene-sequencing data detected genera of Bacillus and Bacillus clausii strain in the BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, PROALANA-B®, BENEGUT®, and TUFPRO® products; however, Ralstonia mannitolilytica and Paenibacillus dendritiformis species were identified in β-LOCK® and PROCILLUS®, respectively. As correct label information was observed only in BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, and TUFPRO® products, it is proposed that a more stringent quality check would minimize the possibility of mismatch concerning the label information.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Probiotics contain vital non-pathogenic bacteria which transiently colonize the intestine and offer positive health benefits to the host by increasing the count of beneficial commensal microbes [1, 2]. Therapeutic applications of probiotics have been demonstrated in the management of diarrhea, respiratory infections, and gastrointestinal diseases. Most of the probiotic preparations contain Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium sps, which have been proven to improve the intestinal microenvironment of the host [3] and treat acute diarrhea in children [4]. Bacillus clausii containing probiotics have been used for the treatment of intestinal infections through the promotion of cellular and humoral immune activity [5]. The Bacillus species are ubiquitously present in the healthy gut accounting for around 2 × 106 endospores [6]. The therapeutic benefits of Bacillus clausii were demonstrated in 1960 for the treatment of viral diarrhea in children and antibiotic-generated gut disturbances [7]. Bacillus clausii spores are known to survive in the environment of gastric pH and colonize the intestinal tract mucosa, and grow into vegetative forms [7]. Moreover, this bacterium is resistant to most antibiotics due to the presence of antibiotics-resistance genes, and thus it easily colonizes the digestive tract even in the presence of antibiotics [8]. The bacterium is also resistant to certain anti-infective agents [9]. Consequently, easy colonization, invulnerability, incitement, and antimicrobial properties of Bacillus clausii strain render it a preferable probiotic option.

Probiotic formulations of Bacillus clausii have been reported to be clinically efficacious for the treatment of acute diarrhea in adults [7, 10] and are considered safe except for a few reported incidences of sepsis and bacteremia in recent research [11, 12]. Diarrhea is the third leading cause of mortality in children under the age of five, accounting for 13% of mortality in this age group, killing around 300,000 children and 525,000 people each year in India and under-developed countries [13, 14]. The clinical importance of Bacillus clausii has also been corroborated in children with acute diarrhea as an additional therapy to oral rehydration therapy [15, 16]. A range of spore-forming Bacillus clausii probiotics are readily available over-the-counter (OTC) for the treatment of acute diarrhea in adults and children and as adjunctive therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection in India [17]. However, several studies have raised concerns regarding the conformity of marketed probiotic preparations [18, 19]. In India, Nutrition policy and the Indian Council of Medical Research and Department of Biotechnology (ICMR-DBT) guidelines [20,21,22] have recommended verification of the viable bacterial count, microbial species, and strains as per the product label. Accordingly, stringent consideration is required for the assessment of quality and guidelines of the probiotics before launching the products in the market.

In India, several spore-forming Bacillus clausii probiotics are available OTC for human use such as ECOGRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, ENTROMAX®, OSPOR®, GUTPRO®, CYFOLAC®, BACIPRO®, β-LOCK®, BENEGUT®, PROCILLUS®, PROALANA-B®, and TUFPRO® [22,23,24]. As the therapeutic efficacy of probiotics is attributed to the specific bacterial strains and number of viable bacteria, a disparity between the label information on probiotics has raised concerns about the conformity of marketed probiotic preparations. Thus, considering the importance of an unbiased research facility evaluation, this study aimed to examine the possible mismatches in the asserted label information in 7 commercially available Bacillus clausii spore suspension probiotic products, BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, β-LOCK®, BENEGUT®, PROCILLUS®, PROALANA-B®, and TUFPRO®. These formulations were assessed for colony count (CFU/mL), antibiotic resistance, and hemolytic activity. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed to verify the presence of a univariate strain (Bacillus clausii). Since probiotic-based therapies are in great demand in India and worldwide, it is hypothesized that the current study may be pertinent for a precise check on the quality and quantity of probiotic preparations.

Materials and methods

Oral suspension of probiotics containing Bacillus clausii spores

We collected 7 commercially available spore-forming oral suspension products of the Bacillus clausii strain marketed in India. These products are available with the following brand names: BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, β-LOCK®, BENEGUT®, PROCILLUS®, PROALANA-B®, and TUFPRO®. The manufacture/supplier information and batch number of the selected products are presented in Table 1. To rule out the batch-specific variation, we randomly chose 3 different batches of each product. However, due to the unavailability of different batches, only one lot of β-LOCK®, BENEGUT®, PROCILLUS®, and PROALANA-B® products were selected. We obtained 10 vials of each brand and stored them at a temperature not exceeding 30 °C.

Table 1 Details of commercial Bacillus clausii spore suspension probiotics
Full size table

Viable spore count and isolation of bacteria

The isolation and enumeration of bacteria were performed by the pour-plate method as described earlier [22]. In brief, isolation, and cultivation of bacteria were done in brain heart infusion (BHI) media and BHI agar. Typically, 5 mL of oral suspension was diluted with an equal volume of saline and vortexed. This stock solution was then serially diluted to obtain 106, 107, and 108 dilutions of each product. Before plating, spores of the different samples were heat-killed at 75 °C for 25 min, to ensure the absence of any residual vegetative cells or germinated spores. Next, spores were plated and allowed to incubate at 44 °C for 48 h. Post-incubation visible colonies were counted and expressed as CFU.

The spread plate procedure was performed as described previously [25]. The same dilutions made for the pour-plate method were used for this procedure. Briefly, 100 μL of the sample was transferred aseptically to BHI 2% agar plate, and then the sample was uniformly spread using a Z glass rod. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The bacterial counting was manually done by two independent researchers using the microbiological plating method.

Molecular characterization: Colony fingerprinting PCR

The bacterial colony was isolated using the streak plate method. The bacterial DNA was extracted by phenol:chloroform:isomyl method as reported earlier [26] and DNA purity and integrity was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1). DNA templates were amplified using 2 μL of forward and reverse primers, 20 μL of master mix (Taq polymerase, 10x buffer, Mg2+ ions, disH2O, Green Taq color), and RNASE free water to achieve the final reaction mixture of 40 μL. A thermal cycler was used to perform PCR amplification, which included an initial denaturation phase (95 °C for 7 min), 30 cycles of denaturation (90 °C for 30 s), annealing (40 °C for 1 min), extension (65 °C for 8 min), and a single final extension step (65 °C for 16 min). The PCR products were electrophoresed in 8% (w/v) agarose gel and the resulting fingerprints were compared directly with 1.5 kb DNA ladder under UV transilluminator after staining with ethidium bromide (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

SDS-PAGE of the genomic DNA (gDNA): the agarose gel electrophoresis image represents the integrity of the isolated gDNA

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

PCR gel: the agarose gel electrophoresis image indicates the integrity of amplified PCR products

Full size image

Antibiotic susceptibility of probiotic products

The disc diffusion methodology was used to perform the antimicrobial susceptibility test as reported earlier [27]. Thirty-one commercially available paper antibiotic discs with a defined concentration were employed. The results were categorized as susceptible when zone of inhibition diameter was 10 mm or more, and no inhibition zone diameter was considered as resistant [28]. The composition of the employed antibiotics is mentioned in Table 2.

Table 2 Composition of antibiotics
Full size table

The enriched BHI broth was prepared and one colony from the previous streaked plate of a sample was inoculated in the broth. This broth was incubated at 37 °C ± 2 °C for 24 h. In the culture inoculated agar plate, 31 commercially manufactured paper antibiotic discs of various doses were placed. The diameter of the zone (mm) indicates the measure of the susceptibility of the isolate and the amount of drug diffused through the agar medium. Each batch of individual products was tested independently using microbiological plating and molecular techniques to determine whether the strain was resistant to antibiotics (Bacillus clausii).

Hemolytic activity

The test for hemolytic activity was performed as per the previously mentioned method [9]. Briefly, bacterial cells were cultured on Columbia blood agar base (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), supplemented with 5% (v/v) sheep blood to test their potential to cause distinct forms of hemolysis. Plates were incubated in an aerobic incubator at 37 °C. The observations were made based on the type of hemolysis, and labeled as alpha, beta, and gamma after 24 h and 72 h of incubation periods. A bacterial colony growing on agar is bordered by a greenish discoloration known as alpha hemolysis. Beta hemolysis is the complete breakdown of red blood cells hemoglobin in the presence of the bacterial colony. Gamma hemolysis is indicated by the lack of hemolysis in the area surrounding the bacterial colony. The brownish color of the blood agar plate indicates gamma hemolysis.

Species identification by 16S rRNA gene sequencing method

One representative isolate from each fingerprinting pattern was selected for PCR amplification of the 16S rRNA gene to identify various bacterial species. The primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) were used to amplify DNA fragments of around 1 kb (equivalent to the size of the 16S rRNA gene). Template DNA, 2 μM primer concentration, and 20 μL Megamix were used to make the reaction mixture (40 μL). An initial denaturation step (94 °C, 5 min), 30 cycles of denaturation (94 °C for 30 s), annealing (58 °C for 30 s), extension (72 °C for 1 min), and a final extension phase (72 °C for 7 min) were performed in a thermal cycler. The PCR products were run on 0.8% (w/v) agarose gels, purified with genomic gel and PCR clean-up and quantified using the gene ruler marker molecular weight standard. The samples were then sent for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis as described earlier [22, 29].

The collected rRNA sequences were converted to FastQ format. The FastQ files containing information on the sequences of the studied areas of the 16S rRNA gene, as well as information on the reliability of reading each nucleotide, were generated as a result of the sequencing. The preliminary bioinformatic processing was performed by combining forward and backward reads, filtering sequences with low individual nucleotide readings and chimeric sequences, distributing reads based on barcode sequences, and removing technical sequences using ChromasPro version 2.1.10. The taxonomic verification was done by running the processed sequences using BLASTn [30] against the NT library. The purity of formulation for bacillus was obtained by comparing the % similarity. Phylogenetic analysis (supplementary graphs) was performed using the neighbor-joining method according to the best model identified by MEGA11 version 11.0.11 using the bootstrap test with 1000 replicates [31].

Results

Counting of viable bacteria using the plate method

Bacillus clausii spores were counted using the plate method. As indicated in Table 3, spores count in BACIPRO® (2.01 × 109), ENTEROGERMINA® (2.10 × 109), and TUFPRO® (2.08 × 109) products matched the label claim of 2 × 109 spores/5 mL. The result indicates a marginal deviation in the colony count of the specified products. However, a lower number of bacterial counts were observed in β-LOCK (2.59 × 108), BENEGUT® (4.50 × 108), PROCILLUS® (2.65 × 108), and PROALANA-B® (5.90 × 108) contrary to the details provided in their label claim. Moreover, as presented in section 3.4, colonies from β-LOCK® and PROCILLUS® products displayed a sequence similarity with Ralstonia mannitolilytica and Paenibacillus dendritiformis; and it is believed that the bacterial spores count in these 2 products may belong to these species.

Table 3 Count of the spore formers in different Bacillus Clausii products
Full size table

Antibiotic susceptibility profile of the probiotic products

All the 7 Bacillus clausii spore suspension products were tested for antibiotic susceptibility by disc-diffusion technique. As presented in Table 4, the zone of inhibition (susceptibility) of test antibiotics ranged from 0 to 39 mm for Bacillus clausii strain obtained from BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, β-LOCK®, BENEGUT®, PROCILLUS®, PROALANA-B®, and TUFPRO®. Out of the 7 products, BENEGUT® displayed maximum resistance (out of 31 antibiotics 19 showed no zone of inhibition) and β-LOCK® showed maximum susceptibility [out of 31 antibiotics 24 showed a zone of inhibition (range 13–34 mm)]. Moreover, as listed in Table 5, most of the broad-spectrum antibiotics were found to be resistant to the chosen products. All the 7 products were identified to be resistant to cefepime, metronidazole, erythromycin, azithromycin, and nystatin as indicated by the presence of no inhibition zone (Table 4). The results indicate that most of the selected probiotic products are resistant to major antibiotics.

Table 4 Inhibition zone diameter (mm) of the test antibiotics
Full size table
Table 5 Antibiotic susceptibility test (R: Resistant and S: Susceptible)
Full size table

Haemolytic activity

As depicted in Fig. 3, 6 out of 7 products showed no degradation in the agar plate, thereby indicating gamma-hemolysis activity. However, β-LOCK® probiotic exhibited beta-hemolysis as represented by the complete breakdown of hemoglobin in the proximity of a bacterial colony.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The hemolytic activity test using Bacillus clausii probiotic products

Full size image

Species identification using 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis

The 16S rRNA gene sequencing results are tabulated in Table 6. The bacterial colonies from BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, BENEGUT®, PROALANA-B®, and TUFPRO® displayed sequence identity of Bacillus clausii species, according to sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA gene amplicon collected from the isolates (Table 6). However, colonies sequenced from β-LOCK® and PROCILLUS® products showed high sequence similarity with Ralstonia mannitolilytica and Paenibacillus dendritiformis.

Table 6 16S rRNA gene sequencing data of seven probiotic products
Full size table

Discussion

Our study corroborated the label count (2 × 109 CFU/5 mL) in BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, and TUFPRO® products containing Bacillus clausii. The Bacillus clausii probiotics are known to impart a variety of health benefits such as recovery from inflammatory bowel illness and acute diarrhoea in children under the age of 5 years as well as in adults [32]. The safety and tolerability of Bacillus clausii probiotics have been well studied. Treatment with Bacillus clausii (2 × 109 CFU/5 mL) for 10 days was found to be effective against acute diarrhoea and safe in humans [7]. Several other clinical studies have also validated the safety profile of other Bacillus clausii probiotics [15, 33]. As the efficacy of probiotics is associated with the strain-specific phenotype and the number of live bacteria, we performed both qualitative and quantitative tests for some marketed Bacillus clausii products. In the quantitative assays, the label information about the number of Bacillus clausii count was found to match the label claims for BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, and TUFPRO® formulations. However, we noted some mismatch in the claimed bacterial counts in β-LOCK®, BENEGUT®, PROCILLUS®, and PROALANA-B® products. While analysis of these samples was done in triplicate, a lower number of vegetative cell counts in the latter 4 products may be limited to the specific batch. A similar type of mismatch concerning the number of Bacillus clausii counts has been reported in the commercially available probiotic products marketed in Italy [34]. The study also suggested the importance of independent laboratory analysis in the quality check of label indications. Since the count of the viable bacteria is one of the critical elements in defining probiotic effectiveness, deviation from the actual content of strains in probiotic formulations should be taken into consideration. We propose that stringent quality control measures may provide better clinical benefits to the patients.

Endospore-forming Bacillus clausii are aerobic, gram-positive bacteria, and resistant to broad-spectrum antibiotics [28]. Thus, we evaluated the antibiotic susceptibility of Bacillus clausii suspension against 31 antibiotics using the disc-diffusion technique in the selected 7 probiotics. Antibiotic susceptibility results indicated resistance of BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, β-LOCK®, BENEGUT®, PROCILLUS®, PROALANA-B®, and TUFPRO® to cefepime, metronidazole, erythromycin, azithromycin, and nystatin. Earlier studies also reported antibiotic resistance of Bacillus clausii strains in ENTEROGERMINA® [35]. The antibiotic-resistant properties of probiotics help in restoring commensal microflora and survival during concomitant treatment with antibiotics [36]. The analysis of whole-genome sequencing for antibiotic-resistant and transferable genes of each Bacillus clausii strain used in their probiotic products is not available, except few products [9, 37]. It has been reported that the production of an aminoglycoside inactivating enzyme by the aadD2 chromosomal gene in Bacillus clausii confers resistance to aminoglycosides [33] and a chromosomal mutation may be causal to the resistance of Bacillus clausii to rifampicin [33, 37]. Moreover, the expression of the CAT by the catBcl gene in probiotics containing Bacillus clausii has been reported to result in resistance to chloramphenicol [36]. Bacillus clausii containing probiotics contain several classes of beta-lactamases that are resistant to penicillin such as ampicillin [38]. Taken together, most of the commercially available Bacillus clausii probiotics are antibiotic-resistant, and concomitant consumption with antibiotics may not affect the viability of the Bacillus clausii containing probiotics.

The evaluation of hemolytic activity was carried out as required by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Out of the 7 probiotic products, only one β-LOCK® probiotic formulation showed the sign of β-hemolysis. This result indicates the requirement for stringent regular quality checks of commercially available probiotic products. All the 7 probiotics were also subjected to the species level investigation using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The data confirmed the genera of Bacillus and Bacillus clausii species in BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, PROALANA-B®, BENEGUT®, and TUFPRO® products. However, the presence of Ralstonia mannitolilytica/pickettii and Paenibacillus dendritiformis/popilliae species were noted in β-LOCK® and PROCILLUS®, respectively. As 16S rRNA gene sequencing data has been considered an integral asset for distinguishing proof and phylogenetic investigation of microscopic organisms, the detection of other strains in commercial probiotics may raise clinical concerns. However, limitation of this study is that the bacterial genus level differences were not identified by this gene sequencing method, as shotgun metagenomics analysis was not done. We noted a high consistency in the label information of BACIPRO®, ENTEROGERMINA®, PROALANA-B®, BENEGUT®, and TUFPRO® products, which exhibited match with superior efficacy as well as popularity.

In conclusion, the number of viable bacterial counts did not match with the specified data in 4 four probiotic products, and 2 out of 7 probiotic formulations differed qualitatively concerning the label information. It is proposed that a regular and rigorous quality control process should be adopted to ensure the asserted label information in the probiotics. We suggest that a periodic reconnaissance is essential to control the clinical effectiveness of commercially available probiotic products.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the INSDC repository, and the accession number for the raw data generated with the 16S rRNA gene sequencing reported in this paper is BioProject PRJDB13145.

Availability of data and materials

16S rRNA data is deposited in the INSDC repository having an accession number: BioProject PRJDB13145.

References

  1. Gueimonde M, Salminen S. New methods for selecting and evaluating probiotics. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38(Suppl 2):S242–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(07)60003-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Han S, Lu Y, Xie J, Fei Y, Zheng G, Wang Z, et al. Probiotic gastrointestinal transit and colonization after Oral administration: a long journey. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:609722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2021.609722.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Saarela M, Lahteenmaki L, Crittenden R, Salminen S, Mattila-Sandholm T. Gut bacteria and health foods--the European perspective. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;78(1–2):99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00235-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. van den Nieuwboer M, Brummer RJ, Guarner F, Morelli L, Cabana M, Claassen E. Safety of probiotics and synbiotics in children under 18 years of age. Benef Microbes. 2015;6(5):615–30. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2014.0157.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Guarner F, Malagelada JR. Gut flora in health and disease. Lancet. 2003;361(9356):512–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12489-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benno Y, TJB M. Development of intestinal microflora in humans and animals. Microflora. 1986;5(1):13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sudha MR, Bhonagiri S, Kumar MA. Efficacy of Bacillus clausii strain UBBC-07 in the treatment of patients suffering from acute diarrhoea. Benef Microbes. 2013;4(2):211–6. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2012.0034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maugo BM. Effectiveness of Bacillus clausii in reducing duration of illness in acute diarrhoea in children 6–59 months of age admitted with severe dehydration: University of Nairobi, Kenya; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lakshmi SG, Jayanthi N, Saravanan M, Ratna MS. Safety assesment of Bacillus clausii UBBC07, a spore forming probiotic. Toxicol Rep. 2017;4:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.12.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nista EC, Candelli M, Cremonini F, Cazzato IA, Zocco MA, Franceschi F, et al. Bacillus clausii therapy to reduce side-effects of anti-helicobacter pylori treatment: randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;20(10):1181–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02274.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Princess I, Natarajan T, Ghosh S. When good bacteria behave badly: a case report of Bacillus clausii sepsis in an immunocompetant adult. Access Microbiol. 2020;2(4):acmi000097. https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Khatri AM, Rai S, Shank C, McInerney A, Kaplan B, Hagmann SHF, et al. A tale of caution: prolonged Bacillus clausii bacteraemia after probiotic use in an immunocompetent child. Access Microbiol. 2021;3(3):000205. https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000205.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lakshminarayanan S, Jayalakshmy R. Diarrheal diseases among children in India: current scenario and future perspectives. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015;6(1):24–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.149073.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. VJTL F. Global, regional, and National Incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 acute and chronic diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. 2016;388(10053):1545–602.

  15. Lahiri K, Jadhav K, Gahlowt P, FJI-J N. Bacillus Clausii as an adjuvant therapy in acute childhood. Diarrhoea. 2015;14:74–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. de Castro J-AA, Guno MJV-R, Perez MOJT. travel medicine, vaccines Bacillus clausii as adjunctive treatment for acute community-acquired diarrhea among Filipino children: a large-scale, multicenter, open-label study (CODDLE). 2019;5(1):1–9.

  17. Zhu XY, Liu F. Probiotics as an adjuvant treatment in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. J Dig Dis. 2017;18(4):195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brink M, Senekal M, Dicks I. Market and product assessment of probiotic/prebioticcontaining functional foods and supplements manufactured in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2005;95(2):114–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elliot E, Teversham K. An evaluation of nine probiotics available in South Africa, august 2003. S Afr Med J. 2004;94(2):121–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Huys G, Botteldoorn N, Delvigne F, De Vuyst L, Heyndrickx M, Pot B, et al. Microbial characterization of probiotics--advisory report of the Working Group "8651 Probiotics" of the Belgian Superior Health Council (SHC). Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57(8):1479–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201300065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Miquel S, Beaumont M, Martin R, Langella P, Braesco V, Thomas M. A proposed framework for an appropriate evaluation scheme for microorganisms as novel foods with a health claim in Europe. Microb Cell Factories. 2015;14:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0229-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Patrone V, Molinari P, Morelli L. Microbiological and molecular characterization of commercially available probiotics containing Bacillus clausii from India and Pakistan. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;237:92–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.08.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lippolis R, Siciliano RA, Mazzeo MF, Abbrescia A, Gnoni A, Sardanelli AM, et al. Comparative secretome analysis of four isogenic Bacillus clausii probiotic strains. Proteome Sci. 2013;11(1):28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-11-28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kesavelu D Sr, Rohit A, Karunasagar I, Karunasagar I. Composition and laboratory correlation of commercial probiotics in India. Cureus. 2020;12(11):e11334. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11334.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanders ER. Aseptic laboratory techniques: plating methods. J Vis Exp. 2012;63:e3064. https://doi.org/10.3791/3064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wright MH, Adelskov J, Greene AC. Bacterial DNA extraction using individual enzymes and phenol/chloroform separation. J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2017;18(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v18i2.1348.

  27. Chen CC, Lai CC, Huang HL, Huang WY, Toh HS, Weng TC, et al. Antimicrobial activity of Lactobacillus species against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00789.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Gueimonde M, Sanchez B, GdLR-G C, Margolles A. Antibiotic resistance in probiotic bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stecher G, Tamura K, Kumar S. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37(4):1237–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sudha MR, Jayanthi N, Pandey DC, Verma AK. Bacillus clausii UBBC-07 reduces severity of diarrhoea in children under 5 years of age: a double blind placebo controlled study. Benef Microbes. 2019;10(2):149–54. https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2018.0094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bozdogan B, Galopin S, Gerbaud G, Courvalin P, Leclercq R. Chromosomal aadD2 encodes an aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferase in Bacillus clausii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(4):1343–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.4.1343-1346.2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. De Vecchi E, Nicola L, Zanini S, Drago L. In vitro screening of probiotic characteristics of some italian products. J Chemother. 2008;20(3):341–7. https://doi.org/10.1179/joc.2008.20.3.341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Senesi S, Celandroni F, Tavanti A, Ghelardi E. Molecular characterization and identification of Bacillus clausii strains marketed for use in oral bacteriotherapy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(2):834–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.2.834-839.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Courvalin P. Antibiotic resistance: the pros and cons of probiotics. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38(Suppl 2):S261–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1590-8658(07)60006-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Khatri I, Sharma G, Subramanian S. Composite genome sequence of Bacillus clausii, a probiotic commercially available as Enterogermina((R)), and insights into its probiotic properties. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19(1):307. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1680-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Girlich D, Leclercq R, Naas T, Nordmann P. Molecular and biochemical characterization of the chromosome-encoded class a beta-lactamase BCL-1 from Bacillus clausii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007;51(11):4009–14. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00537-07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors (AK, MRB and MPD) would like to thank NIPER Hyderabad for providing all the resources and DoP, the Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, the Government of India and DST-SERB, File number SRG/2020/002439 for providing funds.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER), Balanagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500037, India

    Akash Kharwar, Mohd Rabi Bazaz & Manoj P. Dandekar

Authors
  1. Akash Kharwar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohd Rabi Bazaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manoj P. Dandekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AK did all the laboratory work and drafted the manuscript; MRB assisted in 16S gene sequencing analysis; MPD designed the study, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj P. Dandekar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests, financial or otherwise.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kharwar, A., Bazaz, M.R. & Dandekar, M.P. Quantitative and qualitative characterization of commercially available oral suspension of probiotic products containing Bacillus Clausii spores. BMC Microbiol 22, 217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02631-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02631-w

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us