Skip to main content

Antibiotic resistance patterns of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from the Tibet Autonomous Region, China

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori antibiotic susceptibility in the Tibet Autonomous Region, China is not determined. This study aimed to evaluate the antibiotic resistance patterns of H. pylori isolates there.

Results

A total of 153 (38.5%) H. pylori strains were successfully isolated from 397 patients in People's Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region, China. The overall resistance rates were as follows: clarithromycin (27.4%), levofloxacin (31.3%), metronidazole (86.2%), amoxicillin (15.6%), tetracycline (0%), furazolidone (0.6%), and rifampicin (73.2%). Only 2.0% of H. pylori isolates were susceptible to all tested antimicrobials, with mono resistance, dual resistance, triple resistance, quadruple resistance, and quintuple resistance being 18.3%, 44.4%, 18.3%, 12.4%, and 4.6%, respectively. The resistance rates to levofloxacin (40.5%) and amoxicillin (21.5%) in strains isolated from female patients were significantly higher than those from male patients (21.6% and 9.5%, respectively).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates high H. pylori resistance rates to clarithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole, and rifampicin, whereas moderate resistance to amoxicillin, and negligible resistant to tetracycline, and furazolidone in Tibet Autonomous Region, China. The high resistance to rifampicin warns further investigation of its derivative, rifabutin.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a spiral and gram-negative pathogen that infects more than half of the world’s population, causing peptic ulcer, chronic gastritis, gastric atrophy, gastric intestinal metaplasia, gastric cancer and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [1, 2]. Approximately 90% of non-cardia gastric cancer cases have been attributed to H. pylori infection. It was defined as a class I carcinogen by the World Health Organization (WHO) [3]. In the absence of an effective vaccine, the eradication of H. pylori through antibiotics has become the main strategy for resolving gastric lesions and preventing the occurrence of gastric cancer [2, 4, 5].

In recent years, the increasing resistance of H. pylori against commonly used antibiotics has posed a great challenge to its eradication [6]. For example, its resistance rate to clarithromycin (CLR) and metronidazole (MTZ) has generally risen to more than 15% worldwide, making the standard CLR or MTZ-based triple therapy no longer the first-line treatment [1]. To ensure an eradication rate exceeding 90%, treatment regimens based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) have been recommended [7, 8]. However, clinicians do not always have access to the resistance data for each H. pylori isolate, so the selection of therapeutic regimens based on the prevalence of antibiotic resistance remains the current important method.

Of note, the prevalence of H. pylori antibiotic resistance varies globally and even in a country [9, 10]. For instance, a meta-analysis demonstrated that the resistance rates to amoxicillin (AML) and tetracycline (TET) reached 38% and 13% in Africa, 14% and 10% in Eastern Mediterranean region, whereas the resistance rates to AML and TET in European region were nearly 0%. Therefore, region-specific surveillance of the H. pylori antibiotic resistance data has been recommended to guide appropriate choice of H. pylori eradication regimens [6].

To date, many studies have investigated the prevalence of H. pylori antibiotic resistance in northern, eastern, and southern China [11,12,13,14,15]. However, H. pylori antibiotic resistance data of the Tibet Autonomous Region, which is a high-altitude province located in West China, remains to be confirmed. In this study, we performed AST of H. pylori strains in this Tibetan region with seven antibiotics: CLR, levofloxacin (LEV), MTZ, AML, TET, rifampicin (RIF), furazolidone (FZD).

Materials and methods

Patients and H. pylori isolation

Patients from the Tibetan Autonomous Region scheduled for gastroscopy in the People's Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region were enrolled between 2018 and 2020. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

During gastroscopy, 1 or 2 biopsy specimens were taken from the gastric antrum and/or corpus and placed in sterile vials containing H. pylori preservation solution. The gastric specimens were then transferred in dry ice to the H. pylori laboratory at West China-Marshall Research Center for Infectious Diseases. The specimens were homogenized and incubated onto Columbia agar plates supplemented with 5% sheep blood, which were purchased from Autobio (China). After incubating the plates for 3–5 days at 37℃ under microaerophilic conditions (N2: H2: CO2, 85%: 5%: 10%), the colonies resembling H. pylori were expanded and confirmed by Gram-staining, oxidase, catalase and urease tests.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

AST of the isolated H. pylori strains to CLR, LEV, MTZ, AML, TET and RIF was performed through an E-test (Liofilchem s.r.l, Italy), whereas the susceptibility to FZD was determined using a disk diffusion method as previously described [16]. In brief, the freshly grown strains were suspended in sterile saline, and the culture suspension was adjusted to a concentration of 1.0 OD600, or approximately 5 × 108 CFU/mL. Subsequently, taken by a sterile cotton swab, 100 μL of the suspension was incubated on a Columbia blood agar plate. An E-test strip or a 6 mm-diameter disk containing 100 μg FZD (Oxoid, USA) was placed firmly on the plate. The plates were incubated at 37℃ under microaerophilic conditions for 3–5 days. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were read by the intersection of the elliptical zone of growth inhibition with the MIC scale on the E-test strip, and inhibition zone diameters were measured in millimeters (mm) with a ruler according to the guidance of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), version 10.0, 2020 [17].

Based on the recommendation of the EUCAST, resistance to CLR, LEV, MTZ, AML, TET and RIF was defined as MIC > 0.5 mg/L, MIC > 1 mg/L, MIC > 8 mg/L, MIC > 0.125 mg/L, MIC > 1 mg/L and MIC > 1 mg/L, respectively [17]. When the inhibition zone diameter was less than 21 mm, resistance to FZD was defined [18]. Strains exhibiting resistance to 3 or more of the tested antibiotics were defined as multi-drug resistant (MDR).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with software SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). The chi-square test was used to assess the discrepancy in resistance rates in different gender, age and endoscopic finding groups. Statistical significance was regarded as P < 0.05.

Results

From 2018 to 2020, 397 patients undergoing gastroscopy were enrolled in this study to have their gastric specimens cultured. A total of 157 H. pylori strains were isolated from these patients, giving a positive culturing rate of 38.5%. Since the contamination occurred during the culture of 4 H. pylori strains, finally, a total of 153 strains were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. The baseline characteristics of these patients with susceptibility testing are shown in Table 1 and Table S1. Among them, the number of men and women was 74 and 79, respectively, and their mean age was 48.9 years. Most of these patients are Tibetans and come from Lhasa city. Among the patients with antibiotic susceptibility testing of H. pylori strains, chronic gastritis or duodenitis was found in 133 patients, and peptic ulcer was found in 45 patients.

Table 1 Characteristics of the 153 patients with antibiotic susceptibility testing of H. pylori isolates

Individual antibiotic resistance rate

To obtain a better understanding of antibiotic resistance in these H. pylori strains, we first counted the MIC distributions (Fig. 1, Table S1). For MTZ, almost two-thirds of the strains had MIC values of 256 mg/L, while the MICs of other one-thirds of the strains were uniformly distributed: 0.25–8 mg/L (n = 22) and 12–192 mg/L (n = 31). The MIC values against CLR, LEV and RIF were distributed widely. For the MIC values against CLR, 109 strains had MICs ≤ 0.25 mg/L, two strains had MICs of 0.32 and 0.5 mg/L, 19 strains had MICs in the range of 0.75–8 mg/L, and 25 strains had MICs from 12 to 256 mg/L. As for LEV, the strains had MICs of 0.023–0.75 mg/L (n = 106), 1.5–12 mg/L (n = 14), and 32 mg/L (n = 34). With regard to the MICs against RIF, the MIC values were more evenly distributed as follows: ≤ 1 mg/L (n = 41), 1.5–4 mg/L (n = 63) and 6–32 mg/L (n = 49) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) distribution of clarithromycin (A), levofloxacin (B), metronidazole (C), amoxicillin (D), tetracycline (E), and rifampicin (F) to 153 H. pylori isolates. Dashed arrows indicate the resistance breakpoints with MIC > 0.5 mg/L for clarithromycin, MIC > 1 mg/L for levofloxacin, MIC > 8 mg/L for metronidazole, MIC > 0.125 mg/L for amoxicillin, MIC > 1 mg/L for tetracycline and MIC > 1 mg/L for rifampicin. S, Sensitive; R, Resistant

Twenty-four strains were AML-resistant, among which, 11 strains had MICs of 0.19–0.25 mg/L, 11 had MICs of 0.38–0.5 mg/L, and the remaining 2 had MIC values of 1 mg/L and 4 mg/L. All 153 H. pylori strains were TET susceptible, with most of them having MIC values in the range of 0.016–0.125 mg/L. Using the 100 μg-FZD disk, 152 strains (99.4%) exhibited sensitivity to FZD, and 1 strain with inhibition zone diameter of 15 mm exhibited resistance to FZD (Fig. 1).

Therefore, among the 153 strains tested for antibiotic susceptibility testing, the overall resistance rate to MTZ, CLR, LEV, RIF, AML, TET and FZD was 86.2%, 27.4%, 31.3%, 73.2%, 15.6%, 0.0% and 0.6%, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

The overall sensitive and resistance rates of the 153 H. pylori isolates against seven antibiotics. The resistance to clarithromycin, levofloxacin, metronidazole, amoxicillin, tetracycline, rifampicin was determined by E-test, and the resistance to furazolidone was determined by disk diffusion method

Multiple antibiotic resistance

Of the 153 H. pylori strains isolated from Tibet, only 3 (2.0%) were susceptible to all the seven tested antibiotics, 28 (18.3%) were resistant to one antibiotic (1 to CLR, 2 to LEV, 20 to MTZ, and 5 to RIF), and 68 (44.4%) exhibited dual resistance (including 51 to MTZ + RIF). MDR was observed in 54 (35.3%) strains, encompassing 28 (18.3%), 19 (12.4%), and 7 (4.6%) strains resistant to three, four and five antibiotics, respectively. Among the strains with triple and quadruple resistance, 10 were resistant to CLR + MTZ + RIF, and 9 were resistant to CLR + LEV + MTZ + RIF. All the seven strains showing quintuple resistance were resistant to CLR + LEV + MTZ + AML + RIF. Notably, simultaneous resistance to CLR and MTZ was found in 37 (24.1%) strains, including dual, triple, quadruple and quintuple resistant strains (Table 2).

Table 2 Resistance patterns among the 153 H. pylori isolates

Factors influencing antibiotic resistance

By comparing the resistance rates of H. pylori in different genders, ages and endoscopic findings, we found that the resistance rate of H. pylori to LEV was 40.5% and to AML was 21.5% in the female group, which were much higher than those of 21.6% (P = 0.012) and 9.5% (P = 0.040), respectively, in the male group. In patients aged 18–40, 41–55, and ≥ 56 years, the resistance rates to CLR (17.6% vs. 27.4% vs. 35.7%), MTZ (82.3% vs. 85.2% vs. 92.8%), AML (11.7% vs. 15.7% vs. 17.8%), and RIF (70.5% vs. 72.2% vs. 78.5%) tended to increase, but there was no significant difference. Furthermore, discrepancies in resistance rates to antibiotics were also observed between patients with non-peptic ulcer and peptic ulcer diseases, but this was not statistically significant (Table 3). Thus, we can conclude that gender is the factor significantly associated with resistance to LEV and AML in H. pylori isolates from Tibet, China.

Table 3 Resistance comparisons of H. pylori isolates from patients with different genders, ages, and endoscopic findings

Discussion

With the AST of 153 H. pylori strains isolated from patients in Tibet Autonomous Region, China, we found a very high resistance to MTZ (86.2%) and RIF (73.2%), a relatively high resistance to LEV (31.3%) and CLR (21.4%), a moderate resistance to AML (15.6%), and low resistance to TET (0.0%) and FZD (0.6%). In addition, the high prevalence of MDR strains should be highlighted (35.3% of strains were resistant to three, four, and five antibiotics). The results demonstrate a treatment challenge of H. pylori infection due to the high resistance to the commonly used antibiotics.

CLR and MTZ are two of the most commonly used antibiotics for respiratory tract or anaerobic infections. Frequent use of these antibiotics for these infections contributes to H. pylori resistance [19]. Although regionally variable, according to a meta-analysis of 178 studies, the resistance rates of H. pylori strains to them are increasing to more than 15% in nearly the whole world [10]. With regard to resistance in the northern, southeastern, and central regions of China, H. pylori resistance rates to CLR and MTZ were reported to be 19%-45% and 74–89%, respectively [12]. In our current study, the CLR resistance rate of 21.4% and MTZ of 86.2% in the Tibet Autonomous Region were within the range of those in other regions. Moreover, previous studies have shown that female patients carry higher CLR and MTZ resistance rates than male patients due to the higher incidence of treating gynecological diseases with the two antibiotics [20, 21]. Here, although the resistance rate between genders was not statistically significant, higher resistance to CLR and MTZ in female patients than in male patients was still observed, which was in line with the results of previous studies [20, 22]. As CLR resistance critically decreases the efficacy of standard CLR-based triple or quadruple therapy, the present result suggests the avoidance of CLR-containing regimens for H. pylori eradication without prior susceptibility testing in Tibet Autonomous Region, China. Although the eradication rate of H. pylori by MTZ-containing therapy can be improved by increasing its dosage, prolonging its duration or adding bismuth, the increased incidence of adverse side effects such as nausea, vomiting, swirling and rashes needs to be considered [23]. Therefore, it would be better to abandon MTZ-containing regimens as empirical treatment regimens for H. pylori eradication without prior susceptibility testing.

LEV-containing triple or quadruple regimen has been increasingly used for second-line eradication therapy [4]. A previous European multicenter study demonstrated a relatively low rate of LEV resistance of 14% [22]. Nevertheless, higher LEV resistance rates have been reported in Asia (up to 56% in China, 34% in Japan, and 28% in Korea) [6]. In this study, a high rate (31.1%) of LEV resistance was also observed, which surpasses the 25% threshold of resistance rate for choosing LEV as part of empirical or rescue regimens [24], discouraging LEV-containing regimens appropriate for H. pylori eradication without prior susceptibility testing. Of note, a higher rate (40.5%) of LEV resistance in female patients than that in male patients (21.5%) needs special attention, which may also be related to more consumption of LEV because of other respiratory tract, urinary tract or gynecological infectious diseases in female patients [20, 21].

In the current study, the rate of resistance to AML (15.6%) in the Tibet Autonomous Region, China was comparable to that reported in the Eastern Mediterranean region (14%) [10]. What should be noted is that in this study, AML resistance was defined when the MIC was more than the EUCAST recommended cut-off value of 0.125 mg/L. When we applied MIC > 1 mg/L as the AML resistance cut-off value used in a multi-region study [25], 23 strains with MICs of 0.19, 0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/L were redefined as susceptible, giving an AML resistance rate down to 0.6% in the Tibet region, comparable to the overall AML resistance rate of 3.4% in China [25]. Hence, the AML resistance role is negligible in clinical practice, which means that this antibiotic could be prescribed in most cases.

Similar to AML, the TET and FZD resistance rates were also low at 0% and 0.6%, respectively, which were in accordance with the resistance rates reported in other regions of China [9, 13]. Regimens including these two antimicrobials without prior susceptibility testing are expected to achieve high eradication efficacy in patients there. Unfortunately, they are not generally available in China, affecting their clinical application. Semisynthetic TET derivatives, including minocycline, are easily obtained in the clinic, and their antibacterial activity is higher than that of TET. It is interesting to test the sensitivity of H. pylori to the TET derivatives to determine whether they can be used as alternatives of TET for treating H. pylori infection.

Rifamycins, including RIF, rifabutin, rifaximin and rifapentine, are transcriptional inhibitor antibiotics that suppress bacterial DNA-directed RNA polymerase [26]. Among them, rifabutin plays an important role in salvage treatment of H. pylori infection [5, 27]. Previous studies demonstrated that the resistance rate in H. pylori to RIF was 1.0%, with full agreement with the rifabutin resistance rate (1.0%) when the breakpoint of RIF resistance was > 4 mg/L [26]. Therefore, they considered that there is cross-resistance between RIF and rifabutin in H. pylori and suggested RIF susceptibility testing to be used for screening rifabutin resistance [26]. In this study, we found that the resistance rate of H. pylori against RIF was much higher (73.2%) than the previously reported rate of 1.0% [28, 29]. Even though the breakpoint of RIF resistance > 4 mg/L was used as suggested by Hays et al. [26], resistance to RIF was still high at 32.0%. The higher RIF resistance rate might be because of two reasons. 1) In many previous articles, resistance to RIF was still detected using the disk-diffusion method (despite the MIC value provided by EUCAST) [30, 31], however, E-test was used to detect RIF resistance in our study. Hence the frequency of resistance may be different. 2) The wide use of RIF for treating tuberculosis, a disease with high prevalence in Tibet Autonomous Region, China, leads to a higher resistance rate of H. pylori to RIF [32]. Of note, if cross-resistance between rifabutin and RIF truly exists, the high RIF resistance rate in H. pylori strains in Tibet, China, would indicate the severity of rifabutin resistance. Nevertheless, it is worth noting that the rifabutin MICs of RIF-resistant strains were not known in previous studies [26, 33], and cross-resistance between RIF and rifabutin needs to be further confirmed in RIF-resistant strains isolated from the Tibetan region of China.

The comprehensive information on H. pylori resistance to 7 antibiotics in this study will be very helpful to select the optimal eradication regimens in the Tibet Autonomous Region, China. Nevertheless, two limitations of our study should be noted. First, we did not know whether the patients had undergone eradication therapy prior to this study. Therefore, the primary or secondary H. pylori resistance rate was not confirmed. Second, our findings were based on adult patients in a single hospital. Most of the included patients were from Lhasa city and only few were from other parts of Tibet, so this study may not reflect the general resistance of H. pylori strains in the whole population of the Tibetan region. Future studies are needed to include more patients (with the inclusion of less than 18 years old and from more hospitals) to determine the general antibiotic resistance in H. pylori strains from Tibet Autonomous Region, China.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the high resistance to CLR, MTZ and LEV makes them unsuitable for empirical eradication of H. pylori in the Tibet Autonomous Region, China, only if susceptibility testing is performed to confirm the lack of resistance to these antibiotics before treatment. The moderate resistance to AML and negligible resistance to TET and FZD suggest that treatment regimens including two of these antimicrobials without prior susceptibility testing are expected to achieve high eradication efficacy in patients there.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the results and conclusion of this study are included within the article and the supplementary file.

Abbreviations

MALT:

Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue

AST:

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

CLR:

Clarithromycin

MTZ:

Metronidazole

LEV:

Levofloxacin

AML:

Amoxicillin

TET:

Tetracycline

FZD:

Furazolidone

RIF:

Rifampicin

MICs:

Minimum inhibitory concentrations

MDR:

Multi-drug resistant

References

  1. Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain CA, Gisbert JP, Kuipers EJ, Axon AT, et al. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the maastricht V/Florence consensus report. Gut. 2017;66(1):6–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugano K, Tack J, Kuipers EJ, Graham DY, El-Omar EM, Miura S, et al. Kyoto global consensus report on Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Gut. 2015;64(9):1353–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang F, Meng W, Wang B, Qiao L. Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric inflammation and gastric cancer. Cancer lett. 2014;345(2):196–202.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fallone CA, Chiba N, van Zanten SV, Fischbach L, Gisbert JP, Hunt RH, et al. The Toronto consensus for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in adults. Gastroenterology. 2016;151(1):51-69.e14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chey WD, Leontiadis GI, Howden CW, Moss SF. ACG clinical guideline: treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(2):212–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flores-Trevino S, Mendoza-Olazaran S, Bocanegra-Ibarias P, Maldonado-Garza HJ, Garza-Gonzalez E. Helicobacter pylori drug resistance: therapy changes and challenges. Expert Rev Gastroent. 2018;12(8):819–27.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Montes M, Perez-Trallero E. How long until routine Helicobacter pylori antimicrobial susceptibility testing? Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(2):130–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kato M, Ota H, Okuda M, Kikuchi S, Satoh K, Shimoyama T, et al. Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan: 2016 Revised Edition. Helicobacter. 2019;24(4):e12597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuo YT, Liou JM, El-Omar EM, Wu JY, Leow AHR, Goh KL, et al. Primary antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori in the Asia-Pacific region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2(10):707–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Savoldi A, Carrara E, Graham DY, Conti M, Tacconelli E. Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and meta-analysis in World Health Organization regions. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(5):1372-82.e17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song Z, Zhang J, He L, Chen M, Hou X, Li Z, et al. Prospective multi-region study on primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from Chinese patients. Digest Liver Dis. 2014;46(12):1077–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hu Y, Zhu Y, Lu NH. Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in China. Digest Dis Sci. 2017;62(5):1146–54.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shao Y, Lu R, Yang Y, Xu Q, Wang B, Ye G. Antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori to 16 antibiotics in clinical patients. J Clin Lab Anal. 2018;32(4):e22339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang D, Guo Q, Yuan Y, Gong Y. The antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori to five antibiotics and influencing factors in an area of China with a high risk of gastric cancer. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19(1):152.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren S, Cai P, Liu Y, Wang T, Zhang Y, Li Q, et al. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroen Hepatol. 2022;37(3):464-70.

  16. Tang X, Shen Y, Hu R, Yang T, Benghezal M, Li H, et al. Re-assessment of the disk diffusion technique for routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori. Helicobacter. 2020;25(4): e12703.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Disk diffusion method. Version 5.0. 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ogata SK, Gales AC, Kawakami E. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for Helicobacter pylori isolates from Brazilian children and adolescents: comparing agar dilution, e-test, and disk diffusion. Braz J Micorbiol. 2014;45(4):1439–48.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Megraud F, Bruyndonckx R, Coenen S, Wittkop L, Huang TD, Hoebeke M, et al. Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics in Europe in 2018 and its relationship to antibiotic consumption in the community. Gut. 2021;70(10):1815–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang YX, Zhou LY, Song ZQ, Zhang JZ, He LH, Ding Y. Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from patients with dyspeptic symptoms in Beijing: a prospective serial study. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(9):2786–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tay CY, Windsor HM, Thirriot F, Lu W, Conway C, Perkins TT, et al. Helicobacter pylori eradication in Western Australia using novel quadruple therapy combinations. Aliment Pharm Ther. 2012;36(11–12):1076–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Megraud F, Coenen S, Versporten A, Kist M, Lopez-Brea M, Hirschl A, et al. Helicobacter pylori Resistance to antibiotics in europe and its relationship to antibiotic consumption. Gastroenterology. 2012;142(5):S-146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Graham DY, Lee SY. How to effectively use bismuth quadruple therapy: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Gastroenterol Clin N. 2015;44(3):537–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Graham DY, Fagoonee S, Pellicano R. Increasing role for modified bismuth-containing quadruple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Minerva Gastroentero. 2017;63(2):77–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu DS, Wang YH, Zeng ZR, Zhang ZY, Lu H, Xu JM, et al. Primary antibiotic resistance of Helicobacter pylori in Chinese patients: a multiregion prospective 7-year study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24(7):780.e5-.e8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hays C, Burucoa C, Lehours P, Tran CT, Leleu A, Raymond J. Molecular characterization of Helicobacter pylori resistance to rifamycins. Helicobacter. 2018;23(1):e12451.

  27. El-Serag HB, Kao JY, Kanwal F, Gilger M, LoVecchio F, Moss SF, et al. Houston consensus conference on testing for Helicobacter pylori Infection in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol H. 2018;16(7):992-1002.e6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ducournau A, Bénéjat L, Sifré E, Bessède E, Lehours P, Mégraud F. Helicobacter pylori resistance to antibiotics in 2014 in France detected by phenotypic and genotypic methods. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(8):715–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang B, Zhao Q, Yin W, Yuan Y, Wang X, Wang YH, et al. In-vitro characterisation of a novel antimicrobial agent, TNP-2092, against Helicobacter pylori clinical isolates. Swiss Med Wkly. 2018;148: w14630.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Glocker E, Bogdan C, Kist M. Characterization of rifampicin-resistant clinical Helicobacter pylori isolates from Germany. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59(5):874–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chisholm SA, Owen RJ. Frequency and molecular characteristics of ciprofloxacin- and rifampicin-resistant Helicobacter pylori from gastric infections in the UK. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58:1322–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Technical Guidance Group of the Fifth National TB Epidemiological Survey. The fifth national tuberculosis epidemiological survey in 2010. Chin J Antituberc. 2012;34(8):485–508 (In Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Boyanova L, Markovska R, Hadzhiyski P, Kandilarov N, Mitov I. Rifamycin use for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: a review of recent data. Future Microbiol. 2020;15:1185–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to colleagues in the Department of Gastroenterology, Tibet Autonomous Region People’s Hospital, for collecting gastric tissues in this study.

Funding

This study was supported by “National Natural Science Foundation of China” (82072248) and “1.3.5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University” (ZY2016201).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XT and HL conceived and designed this work, drafted and revise the manuscript; XT, ZW, YS and XS collected samples, performed experiment and analyzed data; MB and BJM worked on concept and guidance of this study; HT and HL provided the funding support and project administration. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hong Tang or Hong Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participant

The study has been approval by Biomedicine Ethics Committee of West China Hospital for collection of gastric tissues and for entire study protocol. All methods were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent has been obtained from all subjects and/or their legal guardians.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Patients’ characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility testing results for the 153 H. pylori strains.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, X., Wang, Z., Shen, Y. et al. Antibiotic resistance patterns of Helicobacter pylori strains isolated from the Tibet Autonomous Region, China. BMC Microbiol 22, 196 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02613-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-022-02613-y

Keywords

  • Helicobacter pylori
  • Antibiotic resistance
  • Tibet Autonomous Region
  • China