Skip to main content

Route of Zika virus infection in Aedes aegypti by transmission electron microscopy

Abstract

Background

Zika fever has been a global health security threat, especially in the tropical and subtropical regions where most of the cases occur. The disease is caused by Zika virus (ZIKV), which belongs to the family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus. The virus is transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, mostly by Aedes aegypti, during its blood meal. In this study we present a descriptive analysis, by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), of ZIKV infection in A. aegypti elected tissues at the 3rd day of infection. ZIKV vertical transmission experiments by oral infection were conducted to explore an offspring of natural infection.

Results

Gut and ovary tissues harbored a higher number of viral particles. The ZIKV genome was also detected, by RT-qPCR technique, in the organism of orally infected female mosquitoes and in their eggs laid.

Conclusions

The data obtained suggest that the ovary is an organ susceptible to be infected with ZIKV and that virus can be transmitted from mother to a fraction of the progeny.

Peer Review reports

Background

Currently, zika fever has been a cause of worldwide health warning, especially in tropical and subtropical regions, where most of the cases have occurred [1, 2]. The disease is caused by Zika virus (ZIKV), which belongs to the Flaviviridae family, genus Flavivirus [3]. This virus was initially isolated in 1947 from the blood of sentinel monkeys for yellow fever in Uganda [4]. The first case of human infection was described in a 10-year-old child from Nigeria in 1954 [5]. In 2007, the first major outbreak of zika fever occurred on the Western Pacific Island of Yap, in the Federated States of Micronesia [3, 6, 7]. Two main strains of ZIKV were distinguished, the African and Asian lineages [8]. The symptoms of ZIKV infection include low fever, body aches, petechiae, myalgia, fatigue, joint pain, red eyes, headache and a maculopapular eruption, which resembles chikungunya and dengue diseases [9]. ZIKV infection of pregnant women can result in damage to the fetus, such as microcephaly and other brain malformations [10, 11]. In adults, severe neurological complications, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome may also occur [12].

The ZIKV is transmitted by mosquitoes of the genus Aedes, in Africa by the A. africanus, in Asia and the Americas by the A. aegypti. These species are epidemic or enzootic vectors [13,14,15]. The vertical transmission in humans occurs from an infected mother through the placenta to the fetus. In addition, ZIKV can be transmitted by blood transfusions and sexual intercourse [16, 17]. In 2016, the first human-to-human transmission was registered in Texas, USA. However, the most common route of ZIKV transmission is the bite of infected female mosquitoes (horizontal transmission) [18,19,20,21,22], which maintains the arbovirus cycles between A. aegypti and human populations.

The transovarial, or vertical transmission, is the virus transference from mother to a fraction of the offspring, and has been studied to understand virus persistence in nature and its epidemiological contribution in outbreaks [23,24,25]. Since the isolation of ZIKV from field-collected larvae in immature stage [25], and from male [26], which do not feed on blood (usually ingesting elaborate sap and nectar), there is evidence of ZIKV vertical transmission mechanism.

This work focuses on the progression of Zika virus infection in its vector A. aegypti through the analysis of the images obtained by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We characterized the flow of ZIKV infection at the third day after infection. In addition, the ZIKV vertical transmission (from mosquitoes to their progeny) was also investigated by quantification of ZIKV RNA copies, using RT-qPCR technique in pools of orally infected females on 3 days after blood meal and in the pools of embryonated eggs laid by these females.

Results

In order to demonstrate the route of ZIKV infection in A. aegypti, Liverpool strain starved females were orally infected by feeding, as described in Material and Methods. After 3 days, the experimental and control females had their midgut, fat body, ovary and head dissected. The tissues were fixed and processed for analysis by TEM as described in Material and Methods.

Mock and infected A. aegypti midguts are shown in Fig. 1 A and 1B, respectively. ZIKV particles migrating to the inner cells of the tissue are shown Fig. 1B. Cisternae containing ZIKV particles were also observed in this tissue (Fig. 1 C).

Fig. 1
figure1

Transmission electron microscopy of mock and ZIKV infected midgut and greasy bodies from A. aegypti. A Panoramic image of polarized cells from the insect midgut showing unaltered organelles as mitochondria and ER; B Clusters of ZIKV (arrows) were observed in the tissue of infected mosquito; C Arrow points to a ZIKV-containing cisternae; D Fatty bodies tissue presenting ER profiles; E ER-containing ZIKV particles (arrow) in fatty bodies of infected mosquitoes. (ER) Endoplasmic reticulum; (m) mitochondria; (Mi) Luminal microvilli. Bars: A-B 2 μm; C, E 500 nm; D 1 μm

Mock-infected and ZIKV infected A. aegypti fat bodies are shown in Fig. 1D and E. In Fig. 1E, an ER-like structure harbors ZIKV immature particles. A reduced number of viral particles was observed in this tissue, when compared to the intestine (Fig. 1B-C).

In the head of non-infected mosquitoes, elongated muscular structures were found in the insect eyes zone (Fig. 2 A), acquiring a spherical shape when transversely sectioned (Fig. 2B). Clusters of dense granules from different sizes were also found in this tissue (Fig. 2 C). In the head of infected mosquitoes, however, ZIKV particles were clearly distinguished, surrounded by membrane profiles (Fig. 2D-E) or inside vacuoles (Fig. 2 F-H).

Fig. 2
figure2

Transmission electron microscopy of mock and ZIKV infected head from A. aegypti. In non-infected insects, arrowheads point to muscular structures in the mosquito’s eyes longitudinally (A), and transversely (B) sectioned; (C) Granules of different sizes and amorphous shape (arrowheads) were also noted in the head of non-infected mosquitoes; Also in this tissue, viral nucleocapsids of 40 nm in diameter were observed surrounded by membrane profiles (arrows) (D-E), and within vacuoles (F-H). Bars: (A-C) 500 nm; (D-E, H) 200 nm; (F) 1 μm

The females of A. aegypti remained incubated for 3 days with free copula for the production of embryonated eggs. Mature ovaries of non-infected mosquitoes are shown in Fig. 3 A-B, where regions from the oviduct (Fig. 3 A) and dense structures resembling chitin involved in egg formation (Fig. 3B) were observed. Similar to what was observed in the head, transversely sectioned muscular zones showed circular shapes (Fig. 3 C). The infected tissue (Fig. 3D-F) displayed virus-like particles (VLPs) of approximately 50 nm in diameter around dense structures in the ovary of infected A. aegypti. A higher rate of VLPs was found in the ovary when compared to fat bodies and head tissues. Many VLPs-containing vacuoles were noted (Fig. 3E-F), and these particles seem to be enclosed by a membrane of 20 nm in thickness. The amount and localization of VLPs suggests that the infection of this tissue is subsequent to that of the midgut.

Fig. 3
figure3

Transmission electron microscopy of mock and ZIKV infected ovaries from A. aegypti. In non-infected ovaries (A), asterisk marks the lumen of A. aegypti oviduct; (B) Chitin-like structure (cls) involved in A. aegypti egg formation was observed; (C) The same elongated electron-dense structures observed in the head tissue was present in the ovaries (arrow); Arrows in (D) point to vacuoles containing numerous virus particles, around the chitin-like structures; Most of these vacuoles displayed a detaching membrane of 20 nm in width (arrow) that seemed to contain the particles; E-F In other vacuoles, vesicles (arrow) seem to harbor the virus particles of 54 nm in diameter. Bars: (A) 2 μm; (B-D) 1 μm; (E) 200 nm; (F) 500 nm

In order to confirm the presence of ZIKV in orally infected female mosquitoes, three pools of 3 individual mosquitoes in each, at the 3rd day post-infection, were subjected to individual RT-qPCR analysis, revealing a median of 5.5 × 103 ZIKV RNA copies/female, while two pools of 100 laid eggs after embryogenesis period were estimated in 7.45 × 101 (OIV3) and 7.14 × 101 (OIV4) ZIKV RNA copies (Table 1).

Table 1 RT-qPCR of mosquitoes and eggs offspring

Discussion

Several studies showed the Aedes mosquitoes’ genus ability to transmit ZIKV in nature [15, 27,28,29]. Recent studies with chikungunya virus (CHIKV) showed virus spreading inside the mosquito intestine after the ingestion of CHIKV-containing blood [30]. Our study evaluates the progression of the ZIKV infection in A. aegypti after a 3-day period of ingestion of blood containing virus, as occurs naturally when mosquitoes feed, thus generating an infection similar to that in the wild. The ZIKV has some distinctive characteristics from other flaviviruses, such as the high virus titers when compared with other members of this genus. Besides, it presents fast dissemination and great medical importance, which makes the ZIKV an attractive model to verify the viral dissemination after the oral feeding with blood containing virus.

In the midgut tissue (Fig. 1B), viruses replicate rapidly and spread through the midgut cells. The viruses cross the midgut epithelium cells towards the inner layer of the tissue. We could observe the formation of ZIKV-filled cisternae (Fig. 1 C), demonstrating a well-established infection when compared to the control in Fig. 1 A. This rapid propagation has been reported for other arboviruses, such as CHIKV, that spread during the digestion of blood from the midgut epithelium to the basal lamina (BL) around the midgut [30].

The virus accumulation towards the BL has been previously reported to Western equine encephalitis virus (WEEV; Alphavirus) infection [31, 32]. More recently, Cui et al. (2019) reported the increase of ZIKV titers in the midgut of female mosquitoes 3 day after infected blood meal ingestion. The authors propose that midgut distention, due to meal ingestion, results in the enlargement of the BL, favoring viral egress from this infected tissue towards the secondary tissues [33].

In addition, Romoser et al. [34] suggested that arboviruses such as the Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) penetrate at modified BL and infect the tracheo-muscular complex, which becomes a channel of dissemination from the midgut [32].

Fat body from both mock and infected mosquitoes showed large amounts of glycogen granules of varying sizes (Fig. 1D-E). This was also observed in mosquito tissue, by Martins et al. (2011) [35]. De novo synthesized virions were observed within vesicular structures within the ER of the infected tissue (Fig. 1E), while in the fat body of mock-infected mosquitoes only the occurrence of spreading profiles of ER was noted (Fig. 1D).

The region of the mosquito eyes compared in Fig. 2 A-B presents the accumulation of structures that, when transversely sectioned, assume a spherical shape. The proliferation of membrane profiles in infected mosquito tissue (Fig. 2 C-D) was expected, since the infection occurred for 3 days until the dissection of the mosquitoes. In general, the presence of flaviviruses in the salivary glands occurs around 5 days post-infection (dpi) [32, 34, 35]. Nevertheless, virus particles were scarce in the head organs of infected mosquitoes when compared to the ovaries (Fig. 3D-F), suggesting that ZIKV could not completely reach this tissue at 3 dpi.

The BL and other types of tissue were well preserved (data not shown). In the ovaries of infected females, virus spreading along the tissue may include the crossing of the ovary cells and the formation of ZIKV-containing vacuoles. Interestingly, the VLPs within these vacuoles seemed enclosed by additional membranes. It is important to note that, since the image was acquired from a tissue slice, it is possible that what was noticed as a vacuole, could be a membrane invagination.

Differently, vacuoles containing accumulated VLPs in the ovary suggest an advanced infection and an in-process dissemination, prior to other tissues due to the fact that this organ could exhibit the second larger amount of ZIKV particles, after the midgut.

The practice of hematophagy in A. aegypti females is essential for egg production [18] and allows the virus to spread by the bite of the infected insect. Blood proteins digested into amino acids and other compounds are taken up by the fat body, inducing vitellogenin (Vg) protein synthesis. Vg together with other yolk proteins are packaged into oocytes [19, 20]. We hypothesize that this process may contribute to the abundance of ZIKV-containing vacuoles in the ovarian tissue (Fig. 3D-F), which would enable the vertical transmission of virus.

The oocyte, then, passes through the spermatheca where they are fertilized. The female lays eggs between the 3rd and 4th days after blood meal. In the same period, the pathogens that infected the mosquitoes during blood meal, move across the midgut, spread through the hemocoel, invading organs such as the fat body and ovaries as described in this study. This increases the temporal chance to the vertical transmission.

After egg laying, the egg outer membrane, composed mainly by proteins and chitin material, becomes rigid throughout sclerotization. This process provides mechanical protection from the action of pathogens, insecticides, and prevents the excessive loss of water by the embryo contained inside [21, 22]. However, this could probably also preserve, in the case of ZIKV infection, the viruses inside the eggs.

Once the ovaries are infected prior to other organs, chances of vertical transmission increase - in an analogue way to what occurs in humans when mothers transmit the virus to the embryos during the pregnancy [36,37,38,39]. This type of transmission was also observed for other arboviruses, including DENV, CHIKV, WNV and YFV [40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51].

The results presented here can contribute to the understanding of the ZIKV propagation throughout the A. aegypti tissues. In addition, our data suggest that the female mosquito is able to transmit the ZIKV to its offspring, due to the large amount of VLPs found in the ovaries. RT-qPCR data from female mosquitoes and eggs corroborated our hypothesis (Table 1), since the ZIKV genome was detected in eggs laid from infected females. The infection of A. aegypti mosquitoes by feeding in laboratory, performed by other research groups, also indicates the existence of vertical transmission of ZIKV through the detection of the virus in larvae, pulp and in mosquitos’ offspring of infected females [52, 53]. While previous studies detected ZIKV in mosquitoes and larvae collected in the wild [23,24,25,26], our work showed the detection of ZIKV in eggs of A. aegypti. If throughout the oogenesis period, the ovaries contain large quantities of viral particles, females would lay the already infected eggs. Thus, transovarial or vertical propagation, can be an important route of ZIKV transmission in addition to infection by a blood meal. The laid egg could be a virus reservoir, since its durability in nature is greater than the mosquito longevity [54].

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study approached the electron microscopy of ZIKV in A. aegypti tissues 3 days after virus ingestion through oral feeding. Together with data obtained by RT-qPCR analysis, our work corroborates the spreading of ZIKV through the mosquito tissues that occurs from the intestine towards other organs of the organism. The high degree of infection in the ovary, reinforced by VLPs accumulation inside vacuoles when compared to the other tissues analyzed, suggest that the ovary is probably the second organ to be infected in this course. Nevertheless, future studies are needed to determine this sequence of infection, and the possibility that mosquitoes’ eggs are already carrying ZIKV in the early stages of the mosquito infection, even before the insect is able to transmit the virus to new hosts during a blood meal.

Methods

Cells and virus

Vero cells (African green monkey kidney, ATCC CCL-81) were cultured at 37 °C with 5 % CO2 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Life Technologies, USA) supplemented with 5 % fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, USA), 50 IU/mL penicillin and 50 µg/mL streptomycin (Life Technologies, USA).

ZIKV (MR 766 strain) was propagated in Vero cells, and viral stocks supplemented with 10 % glycerol were kept at -70 °C. The virus titer was determined by plaque assay, and stock viruses were first propagated in Vero cells in 25 cm² bottles for 5 days, when the viral suspension was removed and added to Vero cells in 175 cm² bottles. The viral suspension was clarified by centrifugation (5000 x g for 5 min at 4 °C) and concentrated by vivaspin (GE Healthcare, USA) following manufacturer’s procedures adapted protocol [55]. The particles were further purified in a gradient of 10 to 35 % potassium tartrate (126.308 G for 16 h at 4 °C in a Beckman SW55 Ti rotor), following an adapted protocol [56].

Mosquito rearing

A. aegypti (Liverpool strain) were maintained in a mosquito rearing facility at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Brazil, under a 12 h light/dark (LD) cycle at 28 °C and 7080 % relative humidity. Larvae were raised in plastic trays containing 1 L of previously filtered water, and fed with 0,1 g of powdered dog chow. Tray water was changed every two days. After pupation, mosquitoes were transferred to plastic cages, allowed to emerge, and adults were fed with a sucrose 10 % solution ad libitum.

Mosquito infection and dissection

Plastic cages containing 200 A. aegypti mosquitoes (100 males and 100 females – five days old) were artificially fed with a 1:1 mix of heparinized rabbit red blood cells and DMEM culture medium containing ZIKV (infected blood meal) at a final concentration of 2,5 × 109 PFU/mL. Control mosquitoes (Mock) were fed with a blood meal without virus. Feeding was performed using water-jacketed artificial feeders maintained at 37 °C and sealed with parafilm membranes for approximately 1 h, inside a Biosafety level-2 (BSL-2) insectary facility. The insects were starved for 12 h prior to feeding. After feeding, poorly or unfed mosquitoes were removed from the cages in all the experiments. Mosquitoes were then maintained under BSL-2 insectary conditions (28 °C, LD 12:12, 70 % humidity) with sucrose 10 % solution ad libitum. Pools of 10 female midguts, ovaries, head and fat body were dissected 3 days post-blood meal, transferred to a glutaraldehyde 2 mM solution in sodium cacodylate 0,1 mM buffer, pH 7.2. A wet paper cup was used for the females to lay their eggs, and the eggs from the first oviposition cycle were collected for the analysis of ZIKV vertical transmission.

Transmission Electron Microscopy

Three days after feeding with ZIKV, mosquitoes tissues such as midgut, fat body, ovary and head were fixed for 2 h at room temperature, in 2.5 % glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2), and post-fixed at room temperature in 1 % OsO4 / 0.8 % potassium ferrocyanide for 1 h. Samples were gradually dehydrated in ethanol and flat-embedded in Polybed resin (Polysciences®). Ultrathin Sect. (60 nm thick) were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate [57]. The ultra-thin sections were observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM Jeol 1200 and Morgani FEI company).

ZIKV Detection and Quantification by RT-qPCR

Entire female mosquitoes and eggs used as experimental samples were processed for RNA extraction with Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) and mechanical maceration, as instructed by the manufacturer. Reverse transcription was performed together with quantitative one-step PCR (GoTaq® RT-qPCR Systems, Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR assay for ZIKV was performed with primers set (5’-GTGTAAACCCTTGGGAGGTTT-3’ forward and 5’-AAGTTGGTAGCAAAGGAGATGGC-3’ reverse). Standard curve used was from CprM-ZIKV Gene Fragments dilutions, ranging 300,000 to 3 copies. All tests were performed in triplicate. BIO-RAD CFX96 touch instrument was used (BIO-RAD, Hercules, Califórnia, EUA), following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Availability of data and materials

Data is available on request to the authors.

Abbreviations

BL:

basal lamina

BSL-2:

Biosafety level – 2

CHIKV:

chikungunya virus

DENV:

dengue virus

DMEM:

Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium

ER:

Endoplasmic Reticulum

LD:

light/dark

PAHO:

Pan-American Health Organization

RVFV:

Rift Valley fever virus

TEM:

Transmission Electron Microscopy

USA:

United States America

WEEV:

Western equine encephalitis virus

WHO:

World Health Organization

WNV:

West Nile virus

YFV:

yellow fever virus

ZIKV:

Zika virus

6. References

  1. 1.

    WHO. Zika Epidemiology Update. World Health Organization. 2019; https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/zika/zika.

  2. 2.

    PAHO. Pan American Health Organization. Pan American Health Organization. 2019; http://www.paho.org/data/index.php/en/mnu-topics/z.

  3. 3.

    Lanciotti RS, Kosoy OL, Laven JJ, Velez JO, Lambert AJ, Johnson AJ, et al. Genetic and serologic properties of Zika virus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(8):1232–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dick GW, Kitchen SF, Haddow AJ. Zika virus isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1952; 46:509–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    MacNamara FN. Zika virus: A report on three cases of human infection during an epidemic of jaundice in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1954;48(2):139–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zika virus outbreak—Micronesia (Yap). Suspected. ProMed June 27, 2007. Available from http://www.promedmail.org, archive no.: 20070627.2065.

  7. 7.

    Duffy MR, Chen TH, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, et al. Zika Virus Outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2536–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Lanciotti RS, Lambert AJ, Holodniy M, Saavedra S, Signor L. Phylogeny of Zika Virus in Western Hemisphere, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(5):933–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Agumadu VC, Ramphul K. Zika Virus: A Review of Literature. Cureus. 2018;10:e3025.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Heymann DL, Hodgson A, Sall AA, Freedman DO, Staples JE, Althabe F, et al. Zika virus and microcephaly: why is this situation a PHEIC? Lancet. 2016;387:719–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Honein MA, Petersen LR. Zika Virus and Birth Defects–Reviewing the Evidence for Causality. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(20):1981–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    WHO: Fifth meeting of the Emergency Committee under the International Health Regulations (2005) regarding microcephaly, other neurological disorders and Zika virus. 2016. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/18-11-2016-fifth-meeting-of-the-emergency-committee-under-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-regarding-microcephaly-other-neurological-disorders-and-zika-virus. Accessed July 2018.

  13. 13.

    Weinbren MP, Williams MC. Zika virus: further isolations in the Zika area, and some studies on the strains isolated. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1958;52:263–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Marchette NJ, Garcia R, Rudnick A. Isolation of Zika virus from Aedes aegypti mosquitoes in Malaysia. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1969;18:411–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chouin-Carneiro T, Vega-Rua A, Vazeille M, Yebakima A, Girod R, Goindin D, et al. Differential Susceptibilities of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from the Americas to Zika Virus. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004543.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Musso D, Nilles EJ, Cao-Lormeau V-M. Rapid spread of emerging Zika virus in the Pacific area. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O595-6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Foy BD, Kobylinski KC, Chilson Foy JL, Blitvich BJ, Travassos da Rosa A, Haddow AD, et al. Probable non-vector-borne transmission of Zika virus, Colorado, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:880–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Chan JF-W, Yip CC-Y, Tsang JO-L, Tee K-M, Cai J-P, Chik KK-H, et al. Differential cell line susceptibility to the emerging Zika virus: implications for disease pathogenesis, non-vector-borne human transmission and animal reservoirs. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016;5:e93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Raikhel AS, Dhadialla TS. Accumulation of yolk proteins in insect oocytes. Annu Rev Entomol. 1992;37:217–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Isoe J, Millar JG, Beehler JW. Bioassays for Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquito oviposition attractants and stimulants. J Med Entomol. 1995;32:475–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Moreira MF, dos Santos AS, Marotta HR, Mansur JF, Ramos IB, Machado EA, et al. A chitin-like component in Aedes aegypti eggshells, eggs and ovaries. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;37:1249–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Farnesi LC, Menna-Barreto RFS, Martins AJ, Valle D, Rezende GL. Physical features and chitin content of eggs from the mosquito vectors Aedes aegypti, Anopheles aquasalis and Culex quinquefasciatus: Connection with distinct levels of resistance to desiccation. J Insect Physiol. 2015;83:43–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ayllón T, Campos R de M, Brasil P, Morone FC, Câmara DCP, Meira GLS, et al. Early Evidence for Zika Virus Circulation among Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1411–2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li C-X, Guo X-X, Deng Y-Q, Xing D, Sun A-J, Liu Q-M, et al. Vector competence and transovarial transmission of two Aedes aegypti strains to Zika virus. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2017;6:e23–e23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/emi.2017.8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Costa CF da, Silva AV da, Nascimento VA do, Souza VC de, Monteiro DC da S, Terrazas WCM, et al. Evidence of vertical transmission of Zika virus in field-collected eggs of Aedes aegypti in the Brazilian Amazon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12:e0006594. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006594.

  26. 26.

    Ferreira-de-Brito A, Ribeiro IP, de Miranda RM, Fernandes RS, Campos SS, da Silva KAB, et al. First detection of natural infection of Aedes aegypti with Zika virus in Brazil and throughout South America. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2016;111:655–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Diallo D, Sall AA, Diagne CT, Faye O, Faye O, Ba Y, et al. Zika virus emergence in mosquitoes in southeastern Senegal, 2011. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109442.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Grard G, Caron M, Mombo IM, Nkoghe D, Mboui Ondo S, Jiolle D, et al. Zika virus in Gabon (Central Africa)—2007: a new threat from Aedes albopictus? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(2):e2681.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Campos GS, Bandeira AC, Sardi SI. Zika Virus Outbreak, Bahia, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21(10):1885–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kantor AM, Grant DG, Balaraman V, White TA, Franz AWE. Ultrastructural Analysis of Chikungunya Virus Dissemination from the Midgut of the Yellow Fever Mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Viruses. 2018;10(10):571.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Hardy JL, Houk EJ, Kramer LD, Reeves WC. Intrinsic factors affecting vector competence of mosquitoes for arboviruses. Annu Rev Entomol. 1983;28:229–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Houk EJ, Kramer LD, Hardy JL, Chiles RE. Western equine encephalomyelitis virus: In vivo infection and morphogenesis in mosquito mesenteronal epithelial cells. Virus Res. 1985;2:123–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cui Y, Grant DG, Lin J, Yu X, Franz AWE. Zika Virus Dissemination from the Midgut of Aedes aegypti is Facilitated by Bloodmeal-Mediated Structural Modification of the Midgut Basal Lamina. Viruses. 2019;11(11):1056.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Romoser WS, Wasieloski LP, Jr. Pushko P, Kondig JP, Lerdthusnee K, Neira M, et al. Evidence for arbovirus dissemination conduits from the mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) midgut. J Med Entomol. 2004;41:467–75.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Martins GF, Serrão JEE, Ramalho-Ortigão JM, Pimenta PF. Histochemical and ultrastructural studies of the mosquito Aedes aegypti fat body: effects of aging and diet type. Microsc Res Tech. 2011;74(11):1032–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gubler DJ. in Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever, in Gubler DJ, Ooi, EE, Vasudevan S & Farrar J (eds),2nd edn, (eds Gubler, D. J., Ooi, E. E., Vasudevan, S. & Farrar, J.) 1–29 (CAB International, 2014, pp 1–24).

  37. 37.

    Guzman MMG, Gubler DJ, Izquierdo A, Martinez E, Halstead SB. Dengue infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16055. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Besnard M, Lastere S, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau V, Musso D. Evidence of perinatal transmission of Zika virus, French Polynesia, December 2013 and February 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(13):20751.

  39. 39.

    Brasil P, Pereira JP Jr, Moreira ME, Ribeiro Nogueira RM, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(24):2321–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Possible West Nile virus transmission to an infant through breast-feeding: Michigan, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002;51:877–8

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gérardin P, Barau G, Michault A, Bintner M, Randrianaivo H, Choker G, et al. Multidisciplinary prospective study of mother-to-child chikungunya virus infections on the island of La Réunion. PLoS Med. 2008;5(3):e60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050060.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tan PC, Rajasingam G, Devi S, Omar SZ. Dengue infection in pregnancy: prevalence, vertical transmission, and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1111–7.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Basurko C, Carles G, Youssef M, Guindi WEL. Maternal and fetal consequences of dengue fever during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;147(1):29–32.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bentlin MR, de Barros Almeida RA, Coelho KI, Ribeiro AF, Siciliano MM, et al. Perinatal transmission of yellow fever, Brazil, 2009. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(9): 1779–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Adam I, Jumaa AM, Elbashir HM, Karsany MS. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of dengue in PortSudan, Eastern Sudan. Virol J. 2010;7:153.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Fritel X, Rollot O, Gerardin P, Gauzere BA, Bideault J, Lagarde L., et al. Chikungunya virus infection during pregnancy, Reunion, France, 2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(3):418–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Pouliot SHH, Xiong X, Harville E, Paz-Soldan V, Tomashek KM, Breart G, et al. Maternal dengue and pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010;65:107–18.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kuhn S, Twele-Montecinos L, MacDonald J, Webster P, Law B. Case report: probable transmission of vaccine strain of yellow fever virus to an infant via breast milk. CMAJ. 2011;183(4):E243-5.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Barthel A, Gourinat A-C, Cazorla C, Joubert C, Dupont-Rouzeyrol M, Descloux, E. Breast Milk as a Possible Route of Vertical Transmission of Dengue Virus? Clin Infect Dis. 2013;557(3):415–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Stewart RD, Bryant SN, Sheffield JS. West nile virus infection in pregnancy. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2013;2013:351872.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Musso D, Roche C, Robin E, Nhan T, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau VM. Potential sexual transmission of Zika virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015; 21:359–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ciota A, Bialosuknia S, Zink S, Brecher M, Ehrbar D, Morrissette M, et al. Effects of Zika Virus Strain and Aedes Mosquito Species on Vector Competence. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1110.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chaves BA, Junior ABV, Silveira KRD, Paz A da C, Vaz EB da C, Araujo RGP, et al. Vertical Transmission of Zika Virus (Flaviviridae, Flavivirus) in Amazonian Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) Delays Egg Hatching and Larval Development of Progeny. J Med Entomol. 2019;56:1739-44.

  54. 54.

    Maciel-de-Freitas R, Koella JC, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R. Lower survival rate, longevity and fecundity of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) females orally challenged with dengue virus serotype 2. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2011;105:452–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.05.006.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Putnak R, Barvir DA, Burrous JM, Dubois DR, D’Andrea VM, Hoke CH, el al. Development of a Purified, Inactivated, Dengue-2 Virus Vaccine Prototype in Vero Cells: Immunogenicity and Protection in Mice and Rhesus Monkeys. J Infect Dis. 1996;174(6):1176-84.

  56. 56.

    Junjhon J, Edwards TJ, Utaipat U, Bowman VD, Holdaway HA, Zhang W, et al. Influence of pr-M cleavage on the heterogeneity of extracellular dengue virus particles. J Virol. 2010;84(16):8353–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Reynolds ES. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1963;17(1):208–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Davis Fernandes Ferreira for critically reading the manuscript and for valuable suggestions in its preparation.

Funding

This study was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular (INCT-EM/CNPq), Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) - Edital: E_18/2015 pedido:221797.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The authors T.S.S. and L.A.C. initiated and designed the study. T.S.S., T.E.S.G. and L.A.C. conducted experiments of virus “growing” and pre-purification. T.S.S. and L.A.C. conducted the virus purification. T.S.S. and C.R.S. performed the mosquito infection and dissection. L.A.C. and W.S. performed sample preparation for TEM. T.S.S. and L.A.C conducted the image acquisition and analysis by TEM and wrote the manuscript. T.S.S., M.F.M., W.S. and L.A.C. critically revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucio Ayres Caldas.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

da Encarnação Sá-Guimarães, T., Salles, T.S., Rocha dos Santos, C. et al. Route of Zika virus infection in Aedes aegypti by transmission electron microscopy. BMC Microbiol 21, 300 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02366-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Zika virus
  • Aedes aegypti
  • Transmission Electron Microscopy
  • Eggs
  • Ovary
  • Vertical transmission