Skip to main content
Download PDF

Clonality, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from blood in Shandong, China

BMC Microbiology volume 21, Article number: 281 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) can be life-threatening and pose a great challenge to infection control and clinical treatment. However, little information exists regarding the characterization of S. aureus in BSI patients in Shandong, China. To identify the clonality, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance of S. aureus in blood, a total of 101 nonrepetitive blood isolates were collected. The antibiotic resistance phenotypes were determined, and virulence genes were analyzed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Finally, the genetic relatedness was investigated with Staphylococcus chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec) typing for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates, Staphylococcal protein A (spa), and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) for all of 101 isolates.

Results

Of the 101 S. aureus isolates, 24 MRSA isolates and 77 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolates were identified. Overall, MRSA isolates had higher resistance rates than MSSA isolates when exposed to any of the 15 antibiotics tested in this study except for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Among the 17 virulence genes tested in this study, hla, hld, and hlg could be detected in all isolates. MRSA isolates were more likely to carry seb and hlb genes, while MSSA isolates were more likely to carry seg and sei genes. Thirty-five sequence types (STs) and 49 spa types were identified, of which ST59-t437 and ST398-t571 were the most abundant. These two genotypes were also the most abundant ST-spa types in MRSA and MSSA isolates, but their abundances shifted over time, with ST398-t571 being the predominant genotype from 2016 to 2017, and ST59-t437 from 2018 to 2020. Besides, all the ST59-t437 isolates harbored hlgb gene, whereas most (88.9%) ST398-t571 did not. In addition, twenty-four MRSA isolates were subject to SCCmec typing. SCCmec IVa was the most prevalent SCCmec type, and all the ST59-t437 MRSA isolates were SCCmec IVa. We also observed 15 new STs, and some of them were MRSA.

Conclusion

These findings provide additional observations and epidemiological data for blood S. aureus isolates, which can improve future infection-control measures and aid in potential clinical treatments in hospitals and other clinical settings.

Peer Review reports

Background

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most infamous and widespread bacteria that cause several diseases, ranging from minor infections of the skin to wound infection, necrotizing pneumonia, and bloodstream infection (BSI) [1, 2]. Among them, BSI can result in high mortality rates and has shown a great impact on health care operations [3, 4]. With the application of invasive diagnostic tests and organ transplantation, the BSI incidence is on the rise [5]. Previous studies have shown that S. aureus is the second leading cause of BSI worldwide [6] and the fourth cause of BSI in China [7]. Due to frequently occurring antibiotic resistance in S. aureus isolates, especially the occurrence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) isolates, S. aureus infections are particularly problematic [8]. Compared to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), MRSA infections are prone to yield more severe clinical outcomes and are accompanied by an increase in mortality, morbidity, and hospital stay [9, 10], posing great difficulties for clinical treatment.

S. aureus produces a variety of virulence factors, including Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), hemolysins (α, β, γ, and δ), toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1), exfoliative toxins (ETs), and staphylococcal enterotoxin (SE) [11]. Among them, hemolysins and PVL are two types of cytolytic toxins which lyse erythrocytes or leukocytes by the cytolytic effects [12]. Both SEs and TSST are staphylococcal superantigens toxins that mainly cause food poison and toxic shock syndrome, respectively [13]. ETs are epidermolytic toxins and are often related to epidermal infections such as bullous impetigo as well as generalized diseases such as Staphylococcal-scalded skin syndrome (SSSS) [14]. Therefore, it is important to reveal the toxin gene profile of S. aureus and improve our understanding of its epidemiology.

Epidemiological research of S. aureus has indicated that the molecular characteristics of S. aureus may change over time and the population structure has regional differences. For example, two sequence types (STs), ST8 and ST121, were the most abundant S. aureus in the United States [15], but in the United Kingdom, ST22 was predominant [16] and in France ST398 [17]. In China, ST239-t30 and ST7-t091 were the most prevalent genotypes among MRSA and MSSA isolates, respectively in 2012 [18]. However, from 2013 to 2016, the predominant MRSA genotype was changed from ST239-t30 to ST59-t437 [19]. In 2018, another study found that the most common genotypes among MRSA and MSSA isolates were ST5-t2460 and ST188-t189 respectively [20]. However, scarce data on S. aureus BSIs are available from Shandong, China.

In this work, we characterized 101 S. aureus strains. Our work aims to elucidate the characterization of virulence genes, evolutionary relationship, and antibiotic resistance of S. aureus strains isolated from the bloodstream in a hospital in Shandong province.

Results

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

The antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 101 S. aureus strains are shown in Table 1 and Additional file 1. All 101 isolates were susceptible to vancomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline, whereas most of them were resistant to penicillin (85.1%), erythromycin (81.2%), and clindamycin (78.2%). Twenty-four isolates showed cefoxitin and oxacillin (OXA) resistance and all of them harbored mecA gene. These isolates were classified as MRSA isolates. Only one MRSA isolate was susceptible to erythromycin, and only two MRSA isolates were susceptible to clindamycin. The statistical analysis showed that MRSA isolates had significantly higher resistance rates than MSSA isolates in penicillin, cefoxitin, oxacillin, tetracycline, and rifampicin (P < 0.05). Less than 25% isolates were resistant to the remaining antibiotics.

Table 1 Resistance rates of S. aureus isolates obtained from blood
Full size table

77 (76.2%) isolates were found to be multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria (i. e. resistant to no less than three classes of antibiotics), of which 23 were MRSA isolates and 54 were MSSA isolates. The statistical analysis showed that the prevalence of MDR was significantly higher in MRSA isolates than in MSSA isolates (P < 0.05). Besides, most (89.6%, 69/77) of these isolates showed co-resistance to penicillin, erythromycin, and clindamycin. Among them, the MDR-MRSA isolates had the highest co-resistance rate to five antibiotics “penicillin- cefoxitin-oxacillin-erythromycin-clindamycin” (8/23, 34.8%), whereas the MDR-MSSA isolates had the highest co-resistance rate to “penicillin-erythromycin-clindamycin” (24/54, 44.4%).

Virulence genes

The seg and sei genes were the most frequently detected enterotoxin genes, both with a detection rate of 36.6% (37/101, Table 2). In contrast, see and seh genes were only detected in two MSSA isolates and no MRSA isolates. The hla, hld, and hlg genes could be detected in all 101 isolates, but the detection rate of hlb was only 36.6%. The exfoliative toxin genes (eta and etb) had relatively low detection rates. Only two isolates harbored the eta gene and no isolates carried the etb gene. Statistically, the prevalence of the toxin genes seb, seg, sei, and hlb was significantly different between MRSA and MSSA isolates. The seb and hlb genes were more likely to be detected in MRSA isolates, and seg and sei genes were more likely detected in MSSA isolates (Table 2).

Table 2 Prevalence of virulence genes of S. aureus isolates obtained from blood
Full size table

MRSA identification and Staphylococcus chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec) typing

Among 101 S. aureus isolates, 24 (23.8%) were identified as MRSA. Three SCCmec types (II, III, and IVa) were identified in 20 (83.3%, 20/24) MRSA isolates, while the other four isolates (16.7%, 4/24) could not be typed. SCCmec IVa was the predominant type in MRSA isolates (54.2%, 13/24), while SCCmec III and SCCmec II were detected with lower frequencies (20.8 and 8.3%, respectively). It is worth noting that these two SCCmec types were only detected in S. aureus collected from 2016 to 2018. S. aureus isolated in years 2019 and 2020 were all grouped into SCCmec IVa, except for the four isolates that could not be typed.

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) profiles

Among the 101 S. aureus isolates, 20 existing STs and 15 novel STs were found (Fig. 1 and Additional file 2). The novel STs were submitted for ST assignment with the assigned numbers of ST6663 to ST6667, ST6731 to ST6734, ST6762 to ST6763, ST6773 to ST6774, and ST6776 to ST6777. The profiles of the newly identified ST types are listed in Table 3. In the alignment of MLST sequence, eight novel sequences were found in arcC, glpF, tpi, and yqiL each, which were designated as arcC 790, arcC 794, glpF 862, glpF 864, tpi 757, tpi 762, yqiL 901, and yqiL 912. Moreover, 78.2% (79/101) were represented by 13 main STs (having ≥2 isolates), and the prevalent STs were ST59, ST398, and ST5, accounting for 15.8% (16/101), 11.9% (12/101), and 10.9% (11/101), respectively (Fig. 1 and Additional file 2). Seven clonal complexes (CCs) and 15 singletons were identified by Bionumerics. CC59 (19.8%) was the most prevalent CC, followed by CC398 (12.9%) and CC5 (12.9%) (Fig. 1.A and Table 4). The phylogenetic tree analysis results are highly consistent with that of the minimum spanning tree. Isolates of the same clonal complex also belong to the same cluster on the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1.B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic and population structure analysis of Staphylococcus aureus isolates. A Minimum-spanning tree of 101 S. aureus isolates from blood based on MLST. Each ST is represented by a circle sized in proportion to the number of isolates represented by that ST. The gray shaded areas surrounding the STs denote types that belong to the same CC. The number of allelic differences between STs is indicated on the branches. MRSA isolates are represented by red color while MSSA isolates are represented by green color. The detailed MLST profiles can be seen in the Additional file 2. B The maximum likelihood tree of 101 S. aureus isolates for MLST typing. The maximum likelihood tree was constructed based on the seven combined housekeeping genes sequences. Bootstrap support was based on 1000 replicates, and only branch nodes higher than 60 were shown

Full size image
Table 3 Allelic profiles of the novel STs found in this study
Full size table
Table 4 Molecular characteristics of S. aureus isolates collected in this study
Full size table

When ST types and oxacillin sensitivity were combined analysis, the five predominant genotypes were ST398-MSSA (10.9%), ST59-MRSA (9.9%), ST22-MSSA (8.9%), ST5-MSSA (8.9%), and ST59-MSSA (5.9%). When the STs and SCCmec typing were combined, the predominant combination was ST59-SCCmecIVa (41.7%, 10/24), followed by ST239-III (12.5%, 3/24) and ST5-II (8.3%, 2/24). Besides, there was a strong association between certain STs and SCCmec typing, with all the 10 ST59-MRSA isolates identified as SCCmec IVa, both of the two ST5-MRSA isolates as SCCmec II, and most (75%, 3/4) ST239-MRSA isolates as SCCmec III. When the analyses of ST types and MDR phenotypes were combined, we observed that the predominant MDR clone in MRSA was ST59 (43.5%, 10/23) followed by ST239 (17.4%, 4/23). Whereas ST5 (16.7%, 6/54) accounted for the majority of MDR MSSA isolates, followed by ST22 (13.0%, 7/54).

Staphylococcal protein A (Spa) profiles

Spa analysis revealed a total of 49 different spa types in this study with two isolates not capable of being identified for spa (Table 4 and Additional file 2). The most prevalent spa type was t437 (13.5%) and t571 (8.7%). t571 was also the dominant spa type in samples obtained in 2016 and 2017. However, only one t571 isolate could be found in each year from 2018 to 2020 and the dominant ST was changed to t437. When ST and spa typing were combined, a strong association were observed between certain STs and spa types, with ST59 type primarily associated with t437 (75.0%, 12/16), ST398 with t571 (75.0%, 9/12), ST188 with t189 (100%, 5/5), ST15 with t084 (80%, 4/5) and ST16 with t701 (80%, 4/5). ST59-t437 was the most predominant combinations (11.9%, 12/101) among all of the 101 isolates in this study, followed by ST398-t571 (8.9%, 9/101). Other ST and spa types were represented by no more than four isolates per type.

Characteristics of the major clones ST59-t437 and ST398-t571

When the analyses of ST types, spa types, and OXA sensitivity were combined, we observed that ST59-t437 and ST398-t571 were also the most abundant ST-spa types in MRSA and MSSA isolates. Among them, ST59-t437 was detected in 10 isolates from MRSA and only two isolates in MSSA. In contrast, eight ST398-t571 isolates belonged to MSSA and only one ST398-t571 isolate belonged to MRSA. Of the 15 antibiotics tested in this study, ST59-t437 isolates had significantly higher resistance rates than ST398-t571 isolates for penicillin, cefoxitin, oxacillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and tetracycline (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the resistance to other antibiotics between ST59-t437 and ST398-t571 isolates (Table 5). Among the 17 virulence genes tested in this study, seb and hlb were more frequently seen in ST59-t437 isolates than in ST398-t571 isolates (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found in the positive rates for the remaining virulence genes between these two types of strains (Table 6).

Table 5 Resistance rates among ST59-t437 and ST398-t571 isolates
Full size table
Table 6 Prevalence of virulence genes among ST59-t437 and ST398-t571 isolates
Full size table

Discussion

Bloodstream infection of S. aureus can be life-threatening and present great obstacles for effective clinical treatments [21]. Our present study offers insights into the clonality, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance of S. aureus from blood.

China antimicrobial surveillance network (CHINET) surveillance data have shown that from 2005 to 2020 the detection rate of MRSA isolates in China decreased year by year from 69.0 to 31.0% (www.chinets.com). Compared to these data, the resistance rate of S. aureus for oxacillin in our present study was 23.9%, which was roughly one-third of the rate reported in 2005 and 7% lower than the rate in 2020. For comparison, the prevalence of MRSA was 44% in the United States in 2016, 19% in Australia in 2017, 27% in South Africa in 2016, and 7% in the United Kingdom in 2017 (resistancemap.cddep.org). These results suggested that the prevalence of MRSA varies among different countries and provinces. In this study, we also found that 23 MRSA isolates and 54 MSSA isolates were resistant to multiple drugs and most of them showed co-resistance to penicillin, erythromycin, and clindamycin. In contrast, the resistance rate to rifampicin was only 3.0% and all isolates were sensitive to vancomycin, linezolid, and tigecycline. Our finding was similar to the results of the majority of studies conducted in China and worldwide [22,23,24], indicating that these drugs would be therapeutic agents to control infections.

Virulence genes can play a critical role in the pathogenicity of S. aureus. However, the distribution of these genes might differ in different strains. Therefore, detecting the distribution of virulence genes is valuable for epidemiological control of S. aureus. PVL can target neutrophils and often cause severe infection. A previous study in Urumqi showed that 80.8% of ST22-MSSA strains harbored the pvl gene [25]. Xiao et al. also found that 83.3% of ST22 isolates were pvl positive [26]. In the current study, a total of 22 pvl positive isolates were identified, and all the nine ST22 isolates contained this gene. Our results agree with previous findings that ST22 isolates tended to harbor pvl gene than other ST types [27], but the detailed molecular mechanism requires further investigation. Hemolysin is another important cytotoxic molecule in S. aureus which mainly acts on the erythrocyte. In the present study, hla, hld, and hlg genes were detected in all the S. aureus isolates, but hlb gene could only be detected in 37 isolates and showed different distributions in MRSA and MSSA strains. MRSA tended to carry hlb gene, which was comparable with some previous studies [20, 28]. Hlgb was the coding gene of β-hemolysin which was one type of hemolysin produced by S. aureus. By lysing erythrocytes, this virulence factor helps S. aureus evade the host immune system and scavenge nutrients [29], which could increase the survival of S. aureus in human blood [11]. Therefore, the higher detection rate of hlb gene may confer more MRSA isolates stronger survival ability in blood and contribute to the increased morbidity and longer hospital length of stay of MRSA BSI than those with MSSA BSI [10]. Enterotoxins are the major factor to cause food poisoning. These virulence factors are also regarded as superantigens and have profound effects on the immune system. Although the sea was found to be the most prevalent enterotoxin gene for S. aureus isolated from blood in China [18], only 13.9% S. aureus isolates harbored this gene in this study, while seg and sei were the predominant enterotoxin genes. Moreover, seg and sei were detected more frequently in MSSA isolates than in MRSA. These results might represent regional characteristics in Shandong, China.

MLST method has been widely used to depict molecular characteristics of isolates recovered from various geographic regions. Previous studies showed that in China, ST5 and ST59 were the most prevalent BSI MRSA STs in 2016 and 2018, respectively [19, 20]. These two genotypes were also the major epidemic clone of MRSA in East Asia [30]. Importantly, in China, the prevalence of ST59-MRSA among all MRSA isolates of BSIs increased from 4.5% [18] in 2010–2011 to 9.1% in 2013 and 19.8% in 2016 [19]. In the present study, although most of the ST5 isolates were MSSA and only one MRSA isolate belonged to ST5, we also found that ST59 was the most abundant ST type among all MRSA isolates. Taken together, these findings suggested that ST59 MRSA has emerged as an important invasive pathogen for bloodstream infections in China which should be taken seriously. ST398 was the dominant ST in MSSA in our study with a detection rate of 10.9%, which was comparable to the observations in China [19, 20] and France [31, 32] but different from those in Germany and Netherlands [33, 34]. When ST and spa types were combined, the most predominant genotypes were ST59-t437 and ST398-t571 in this study. Among them, ST398-t571 was the most prevalent pattern for S. aureus isolated from blood in 2016 and 2017. However, from 2018 to 2020, the dominant pattern was replaced by ST59-t437, and only one ST398-t571 isolate was found each year. Our finding was comparable to the observation in Li et al.’s study from 2013 to 2016 in China [19], which found a decreased detection rate of ST398-t571 from 2.7 to 0.9% and an increased detection rate of ST59-t437 from 5.5 to 6.4%. Besides, Li et al. also reported that ST59-t437 was the major cause of bloodstream infection in 2016 in China. Interestingly, in this study, we also found that ST59-t437 and ST398-t571 had different hemolysin patterns. All the ST59-t437 isolates were positive for hlgb gene, whereas most (88.9%) ST398-t571 bacteria did not contain this gene. Considering the important role of β-hemolysin in the survival of S. aureus in human blood, the deficiency of hlgb gene may lead to a lack of selective advantage of ST398-t571 isolates in human blood. Besides, a previous study performed by Yang et al. showed that ST59-t437 strain had a stronger biofilm-forming capacity than ST398 isolates [35]. As biofilm formation capacity could increase the ability of S. aureus to survive in the hospital environment and protect isolates from immune defenses [36, 37], the stronger biofilm formation capacity might contribute to the higher detection rate for bloodstream infection. Taken together, the existence of hlgb gene and the stronger biofilm formation capacity may confer some advantages for ST59-t437 strains for bloodstream infections. Further investigation is needed to reveal the molecular mechanism.

We also observed a total of 15 new STs in this study. Among them, one was classified into CC398, four into CC59, one into CC22, one into CC15, two into CC25, and others were singletons, which suggested that S. aureus isolates were diverse and still in clonal expansion. As four of the 15 isolates in the new STs were identified as MRSA, close attention should be paid toward these new STs to identify and further limit both transmission and outbreaks.

Conclusions

In summary, we characterized the clonality, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance of S. aureus from blood in a hospital in Shandong, China. A changing of the predominant genotype from ST398-t571 to ST59-t437 was found in this hospital. These two genotypes also have different antibiotic resistance and virulence genes profiles. Additionally, 15 novel STs were detected, and some of them were MRSA. Collectively, our findings offer new epidemiological data of blood S. aureus strains, which can help improve infection control measures and clinical treatments in hospitals.

Methods

Bacterial isolates

A total of 101 nonrepetitive S. aureus isolates were obtained from blood samples of patients from different departments (neurosurgery, intensive care unit (ICU), hematopathology, and other wards) at the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University (Shandong, China). These samples were obtained from 2016 to 2020. Blood specimens were collected from patients with suspected bacterial BSIs according to CDC criteria [38]. Blood cultures flagging positive were inoculate on Columbia blood agar, chocolate agar, and MacConkey agar. All agars were incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h in 10% CO2. The suspected bacteria were identified using the VITEK-2 compact (BioMérieux, France) GP colorimetric identification card and further confirmed using matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (Bruker).

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

To test susceptibility, all S. aureus isolates were exposed to 15 antibiotics, including penicillin, cefoxitin, oxacillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, linezolid, vancomycin, tetracycline, tigecycline, rifampicin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole using Vitek 2 compact system (BioMérieux, France) with AST-GP-67 cards. The results were evaluated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria.

Detection of virulence genes

To detect virulence genes in S. aureus isolates, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were carried out using conventional PCR amplification [39, 40]. The target virulence genes included the exfoliative toxin genes (eta and etb), staphylococcal enterotoxin genes (sea-see and seg-sej), hemolysin genes (hla, hlb, hld, and hlg), the pvl gene (lukF/SPV), and the toxic shock syndrome toxin gene (tst). Positive amplicons were randomly selected for sequencing to verify the amplicons sequences.

SCCmec typing

MRSA strains were confirmed by the presence of the mecA gene, and SCCmec classification was performed as previously described [41].

Spa sequencing

Spa typing was performed based on the Ridom Staph Type standard protocol. Sequencing results were analyzed using BioNumerics software (version 7.6, Applied Maths), which automatically analyzes spa repeats and assigns spa types [42]. S. aureus isolates that could not be classified as any known spa type were defined as nontypable (NT).

MLST

MLST analyses were performed for all S. aureus isolates as described previously [43]. The amplified fragments of seven housekeeping genes (arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, yqiL) were sequenced in both directions. The sequences were aligned with the reference sequence from the MLST database (https://pubmlst.org/saureus/). Newly identified STs were submitted to the MLST database curator for approval, and new numbers were assigned. A minimum-spanning tree using the allelic difference between isolates of the seven housekeeping genes was constructed using BioNumerics (version 7.6, Applied Maths) software. A maximum likelihood tree was constructed based on the seven combined housekeeping genes sequences using the MEGA software, and only one sequence from the same sequence types (STs) was used to avoid duplication.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 21.0 for Windows. The resistance rates and distributions of virulence genes between MRSA and MSSA as well as between ST59-t437 and ST398-t571 isolates were compared using the chi-square test. A two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are within the manuscript and the Additional files.

Abbreviations

BSI:

Bloodstream infection

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

MLST:

Multilocus sequence typing

MRSA:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

MSSA:

Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

ST:

Sequence type

SCCmec :

Staphylococcus chromosomal cassette mec

PVL:

Panton-valentine leukocidin

TSST-1:

Toxic shock syndrome toxin-1

ETs:

Exfoliative toxins

SE:

Staphylococcal enterotoxin

SSSS:

Staphylococcal-scalded skin syndrome

OXA:

Oxacillin

CC:

Clonal complex

CLSI:

Clinical and laboratory standards institute

CHINET:

China antimicrobial surveillance network

ICU:

Intensive care unit

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

MALDI-TOF MS:

Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight mass spectrometry

MDR:

Multidrug resistant.

References

  1. Dayan GH, Mohamed N, Scully IL, Cooper D, Begier E, Eiden J, et al. Staphylococcus aureus: the current state of disease, pathophysiology and strategies for prevention. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016;15(11):1373–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(8):520–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. López-Cortés LE, Gálvez-Acebal J, Rodríguez-Baño J. Therapy of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: evidences and challenges. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2020;38(10):489–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinez RM, Wolk DM. Bloodstream infections. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4(4):1–34.

  5. Kritikos A, Manuel O. Bloodstream infections after solid-organ transplantation. Virulence. 2016;7(3):329–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mendes RE, Sader HS, Castanheira M, Flamm RK. Distribution of main Gram-positive pathogens causing bloodstream infections in United States and European hospitals during the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2010-2016): Concomitant analysis of oritavancin in vitro activity. J Chemother. 2018;30(5):280–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu F, Guo Y, Yang Y, Zheng Y, Wu S, Jiang X, et al. Resistance reported from China antimicrobial surveillance network (CHINET) in 2018. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38(12):2275–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lakhundi S, Zhang K. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(4): 1–103.

  9. Whitby M, McLaws ML, Berry G. Risk of death from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a meta-analysis. Med J Aust. 2001;175(5):264–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rodrigues R, Passadouro R, Gomes O, Castro R. Risk factors, length of stay and in-hospital mortality of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections: a Case-control study. Acta Med Port. 2020;33(3):174–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oliveira D, Borges A, Simões M. Staphylococcus aureus toxins and their molecular activity in infectious diseases. Toxins. 2018;10(6):1–19.

  12. Mir Z, Nodeh Farahani N, Abbasian S, Alinejad F, Sattarzadeh M, Pouriran R, et al. The prevalence of exotoxins, adhesion, and biofilm-related genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the main burn center of Tehran, Iran. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019;22(11):1267–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Salgado-Pabón W, Case-Cook LC, Schlievert PM. Molecular analysis of staphylococcal superantigens. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1085:169–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bukowski M, Wladyka B, Dubin G. Exfoliative toxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Toxins. 2010;2(5):1148–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. O'Hara FP, Amrine-Madsen H, Mera RM, Brown ML, Close NM, Suaya JA, et al. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in the United States 2004-2008 Reveals the rapid expansion of USA300 among inpatients and outpatients. Microb Drug Resist. 2012;18(6):555–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes J, Stabler R, Gaunt M, Karadag T, Desai N, Betley J, et al. Clonal variation in high- and low-level phenotypic and genotypic mupirocin resistance of MRSA isolates in south-East London. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015;70(12):3191–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bouiller K, Bertrand X, Hocquet D, Chirouze C. Human infection of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus CC398: a review. Microorganisms. 2020;8(11):1–19.

  18. He W, Chen H, Zhao C, Zhang F, Li H, Wang Q, et al. Population structure and characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus from bacteraemia at multiple hospitals in China: association between antimicrobial resistance, toxin genes and genotypes. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013;42(3):211–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li S, Sun S, Yang C, Chen H, Yin Y, Li H, et al. The changing pattern of population structure of Staphylococcus aureus from bacteremia in China from 2013 to 2016: ST239-030-MRSA replaced by ST59-t437. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li X, Fang F, Zhao J, Lou N, Li C, Huang T, et al. Molecular characteristics and virulence gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infection. Br J Infect Dis. 2018;22(6):487–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jung N, Rieg S. Essentials in the management of S. aureus bloodstream infection. Infection. 2018;46(4):441–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fu Y, Xiong M, Li X, Zhou J, Xiao X, Fang F, et al. Molecular characteristics, antimicrobial resistance and virulence gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Wuhan, Central China. Infec Drug Resist. 2020;13:2063–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gu F, He W, Xiao S, Wang S, Li X, Zeng Q, et al. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infections at Ruijin Hospital in Shanghai from 2013 to 2018. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):6019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Monaco M, Pimentel de Araujo F, Cruciani M, Coccia EM, Pantosti A. Worldwide epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2017;409:21–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan W, Liu J, Zhan Y, Wang L, Jiang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Molecular typing revealed the emergence of pvl-positive sequence type 22 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Urumqi, northwestern China. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:1719–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiao N, Yang J, Duan N, Lu B, Wang L. Community-associated Staphylococcus aureus PVL(+) ST22 predominates in skin and soft tissue infections in Beijing, China. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:2495–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen Y, Liu Z, Duo L, Xiong J, Gong Y, Yang J, et al. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from distinct geographic locations in China: an increasing prevalence of spa-t030 and SCCmec type III. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e96255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Y, Du FL, Liu PP, Mei YF, Wan LG, Wei DD, et al. Molecular epidemiology and virulence features of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream isolates in a regional burn Center in China, 2012-2016. Microb Drug Resist. 2018;24(9):1354–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Huseby M, Shi K, Brown CK, Digre J, Mengistu F, Seo KS, et al. Structure and biological activities of beta toxin from Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(23):8719–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ward MJ, Goncheva M, Richardson E, McAdam PR, Raftis E, Kearns A, et al. Identification of source and sink populations for the emergence and global spread of the East-Asia clone of community-associated MRSA. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):160.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Bonnet I, Millon B, Meugnier H, Vandenesch F, Maurin M, Pavese P, et al. High prevalence of spa type t571 among methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus from bacteremic patients in a French University hospital. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0204977.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sauget M, Bouiller K, Richard M, Chagrot J, Cholley P, Hocquet D, et al. Increasing incidence of bloodstream infections due to Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398 in a French hospital between 2010 and 2017. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38(11):2127–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cuny C, Layer F, Köck R, Werner G, Witte W. Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) of clonal complex CC398, t571 from infections in humans are still rare in Germany. PLoS One. 2013, e83165;8(12).

  34. Verkade E, Bergmans AM, Budding AE, van Belkum A, Savelkoul P, Buiting AG, et al. Recent emergence of Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398 in human blood cultures. PLoS One. 2012, e41855;7(10).

  35. Yang X, Qian S, Yao K, Wang L, Liu Y, Dong F, et al. Multiresistant ST59-SCCmec IV-t437 clone with strong biofilm-forming capacity was identified predominantly in MRSA isolated from Chinese children. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17(1):733.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(2):167–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lister JL, Horswill AR. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: recent developments in biofilm dispersal. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2014;4:178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control. 1988;16(3):128–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gu FF, Han LZ, Chen X, Wang YC, Shen H, Wang JQ, et al. Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from surgical site infections in orthopedic patients in an orthopedic trauma clinical medical center in Shanghai. Surg Infect. 2015;16(1):97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Argudín MA, Tenhagen BA, Fetsch A, Sachsenröder J, Käsbohrer A, Schroeter A, et al. Virulence and resistance determinants of German Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates from nonhuman sources. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(9):3052–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang K, McClure JA, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM. Novel multiplex PCR assay for characterization and concomitant subtyping of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec types I to V in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(10):5026–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Li V, Chui L, Simmonds K, Nguyen T, Golding GR, Yacoub W, et al. Emergence of new CMRSA7/USA400 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus spa types in Alberta, Canada, from 2005 to 2012. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(7):2439–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen X, Wang WK, Han LZ, Liu Y, Zhang H, Tang J, et al. Epidemiological and genetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infection in Shanghai, 2009-2011. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e72811.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Xiaomei Yan and Tao Xiao for some helpful comments on our manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030310677), Medical Scientific Research Projects of Foshan Health Bureau (20210358), and Foshan Science and Technology Innovation Project (NO.FS0AA-KJ218–1301-0035). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xuezhi Wang and Dongzi Lin contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Foshan Fourth People’s Hospital, Foshan, 528000, Guangdong, China

    Xuezhi Wang, Dongzi Lin, Zengqi Huang & Jinmei Zhang

  2. Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Shandong Medicine and Health Key Laboratory of Laboratory Medicine, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, China

    Wenyan Xie, Pen Liu & Jiazheng Wang

  3. State Key Laboratory for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Changping, Beijing, 102206, People’s Republic of China

    Huaiqi Jing

Authors
  1. Xuezhi Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dongzi Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zengqi Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinmei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenyan Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Huaiqi Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jiazheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JZW conceived the idea and designed the experiment. JZW and XZW analyzed the results. JZW, XZW and DZL drafted the manuscript. DZL, ZQH, JMZ, WYX, and PL performed the experiment. JZW and HQJ participated in manuscript revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

XZW and DZL contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiazheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University. As this study just focuses on bacteria alone and does not use any human material or patient information, the Review Board of the Ethics Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University exempted this study from review and waived the need for informed consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Lin, D., Huang, Z. et al. Clonality, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from blood in Shandong, China. BMC Microbiol 21, 281 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02344-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02344-6

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us