Skip to main content

Putative mobilized colistin resistance genes in the human gut microbiome

Abstract

Background

The high incidence of bacterial genes that confer resistance to last-resort antibiotics, such as colistin, caused by mobilized colistin resistance (mcr) genes, poses an unprecedented threat to human health. Understanding the spread, evolution, and distribution of such genes among human populations will help in the development of strategies to diminish their occurrence. To tackle this problem, we investigated the distribution and prevalence of potential mcr genes in the human gut microbiome using a set of bioinformatics tools to screen the Unified Human Gastrointestinal Genome (UHGG) collection for the presence, synteny and phylogeny of putative mcr genes, and co-located antibiotic resistance genes.

Results

A total of 2079 antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) were classified as mcr genes in 2046 metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs), distributed across 1596 individuals from 41 countries, of which 215 were identified in plasmidial contigs. The genera that presented the largest number of mcr-like genes were Suterella and Parasuterella. Other potential pathogens carrying mcr genes belonged to the genus Vibrio, Escherichia and Campylobacter. Finally, we identified a total of 22,746 ARGs belonging to 21 different classes in the same 2046 MAGs, suggesting multi-resistance potential in the corresponding bacterial strains, increasing the concern of ARGs impact in the clinical settings.

Conclusion

This study uncovers the diversity of mcr-like genes in the human gut microbiome. We demonstrated the cosmopolitan distribution of these genes in individuals worldwide and the co-presence of other antibiotic resistance genes, including Extended-spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL). Also, we described mcr-like genes fused to a PAP2-like domain in S. wadsworthensis. These novel sequences increase our knowledge about the diversity and evolution of mcr-like genes. Future research should focus on activity, genetic mobility and a potential colistin resistance in the corresponding strains to experimentally validate those findings.

Background

The prevalence of antibiotic resistance (AR) in clinical pathogens is a significant public health concern, especially in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1]. The misuse of antibiotics is the main driving factor for the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Still, its importance is often underestimated in community infections, as hospitalized infections gain the most attention [2]. Many previous studies have addressed the prevalence of AR in clinical environments [3,4,5], and more recently AR prevalence in non-hospitalized populations too [6, 7]. Most of these studies were conducted on cultivable clinical strains using microbiological methods that involve cultivation and antibiogram tests. However, the advances in high-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics provided access to the human resistome through the analysis of metagenomes and metagenome-assembled genomes.

The resistome is defined as the collection of the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in a single microorganism, or in a microbial community, and has been investigated in different environments, such as soils [8], oceans [9], and host-associated microbiomes such as the animal [10] or human [11] gut. Understanding the human resistome in hospitalized and non-hospitalized populations is essential because the commensal microbiota can host ARGs and transfer it from and to pathogenic bacteria through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) [12], e.g., during an infection. In addition, HGT can also play a role in ARG mobilization to environmental communities by water and soil contamination [13] or the food we ingest [14, 15]. The gut microbiome is of particular interest in the investigation of ARGs in the human microbiota since it is the largest, most diverse [16], highly exposed and affected by the intake of antibiotics. A potential influx of ARGs can occur via food intake and/or unhygienic conditions, and the efflux of ARGs to wastewater plants enhances the spread to other environments. As such, the human gut microbiome is thought to be responsible for transferring ARGs [17] to the environment to a large extent. Therefore, the search for ARGs in the human gut microbiome, mostly performed using metagenomics and culturomics approaches, is one of the key fields to unravel the transfer of ARGs and the evolution of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. While past metagenomic studies on ARGs relied on shorter contigs, often below 50 kilobases, new assembly methods that allow the recovery of nearly complete bacterial genomes have been developed. Such methods have been applied to study the human gut microbiome and led to the recovery of thousands of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) [18,19,20]. These datasets were recently combined into one resource, the Human Gastrointestinal Bacteria Genome Collection (HGG) [21], a valuable resource for ARG screenings. The advantage of MAGs versus traditional metagenome gene catalogs is manifold; the most apparent is the high accuracy of phylogenetic affiliations and often complete gene clusters, revealing gene synteny. The latter is of high interest when studying ARGs since the genetic environment often reveals the potential for the genetic mobility of ARGs, e.g., their location on genetic islands or plasmids [22]. Besides, it is also possible to investigate the presence of multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria by detecting more than one ARG in the same bacterial genome or contig [9] when using the MAG based approach.

Recently, colistin (Polymyxin E) has gained attention as the last line of defense drug against MDR bacteria, especially carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens [23]. However, reports of colistin-resistant bacteria are becoming more frequent [24], with its prevalence reaching as high as approximately 20–40% among Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) in Italy and Greece [25]. In the past, the only known acquired resistance mechanism for colistin was mediated by chromosomal mutations, mainly in genes regulating the chemical additions of L-Ara4N and pEtN [26]. The first plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance gene, designated mobilized-colistin resistance-1 (mcr-1), was described in Enterobacteriaceae in 2006 [27]. Later it was followed by the additional mcrs, mcr-2 [28], mcr-3 [29], mcr-4 [30], mcr-5 [31] and, recently, mcr-6 to mcr-10 [32,33,34,35,36]. An intrinsic mcr-1-like homolog from Moraxella osloensis was described, and named icr-Mo [37], raising the discussion about possible origins of mcr in Moraxella. The spread of mcr is of public health concern as it has been attributed to colistin’s over-use, especially in livestock [38] and aquaculture [39, 40]. Here, we screened the HGG for the presence of mcr-like genes and other ARGS among human gut bacterial genomes.

Methods

Data retrieval

We retrieved approximately 171 million non-redundant protein sequences (clustered at 100% in the file uhgp-100.faa) as well as the 276,349 metagenomic assembled genomes (MAGs) and 10,648 genomes from bacterial isolates and the metadata including taxonomic affiliation from the genomes from the Unified Human Gastrointestinal Protein (UHGP) catalog v1.0 [21], part of the HGG, at http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/metagenomics/mgnify_genomes/human-gut/v1.0/.

Antibiotic resistance gene screening

Antibiotic-resistance genes were identified using previously described methods applied to a dataset of marine samples [9]. Briefly, we used the deepARG tool [41] (model version 2), a deep learning approach developed to identify ARGs in open reading frames, to search for ARGs in the non-redundant proteins provided by the UHGP catalog, using the Long sequences (LS) model with default parameters. The deepARG model was originally built considering a dissimilarity matrix of all ARGs from 3 different databases, such as the Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database [ARDB], Comprehensive AntibioticResistance Database [CARD], and UniProt, being an alternative to the “best hits” approach. Only genes with estimated probability of ≥0.8 were considered for this study. We then selected all proteins classified as mcr in the deepARG results and explored the prevalence of these putative ARGs in different countries and across diverse taxa.

Plasmid classification

To verify if the putative genes are of chromosomal or plasmid origin, we analyzed contigs in which sequences classified as MCR were identified using the PlasFlow software [42] with the default threshold of ≥0.7. This software uses neural network models trained on full genomes and plasmid sequences to predict the sequence origin with 96% accuracy.

Phylogeny

Protein sequences classified as MCR present in contigs identified as plasmids in MAGs and complete genomes, were clustered at 97% of sequence identity with the software cd-hit v4.7 [43] to reduce the redundancy of protein sequences in the tree. The representative sequences of each cluster (and reference sequences obtained at NCBI) were then submitted to NGPhylogeny.fr [44] where the protein sequences were aligned by Mafft [45], then the informative phylogenetic regions were selected by BMGE [46], and the Maximum likelihood (ML) reconstruction was calculated by PhyML 3.0 [47] with the model selection performed by SMS (AIC method) [48], and 100 bootstrap replicates to infer significance.

An additional phylogenetic tree was constructed using all MCR protein sequences (from plasmids, chromosomes and reference databases), clustered at 99% identity with cd-hit v4.7. Sequences were queried against the Pfam database using hmmscan from HMMER 3.3 [49] to identify protein domains. Only sequences that displayed both the complete EptA_B_N and sulfatase domains were kept for subsequent analysis. Next, the sequences of each individual domain were extracted from the complete sequences. Domain sub-sequences were aligned individually through MUSCLE v3.8.1551 [50] with default parameters. Aligned sequences were concatenated and used for phylogenetic reconstruction through IQ-Tree v1.6.12 [51] using the LG + R8 model. Bootstrap analysis was performed with 1000 replicates. The final tree was visualized and decorated using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) software (https://itol.embl.de/).

Data visualization

For data visualization, we used the python3 libraries pandas and matplotlib, and embedded the methods in a jupyter notebook file for the sake of clarity and reproducibility (See Data and Code availability section).

Results and discussion

In recent years, culture-independent approaches have been used to investigate the extent, diversity and impact of the resistome from different sources, their natural reservoirs, hosts and genomic context. Herein, we investigate the diversity, abundance and prevalence of mcr genes in human populations stool microbiomes, an important ARG that confers resistance to last-resource antibiotics.

MCR diversity and distribution in the human gut microbiome

We identified a total of 2079 protein sequences classified as MCR (13 MCR-1, 1 MCR-1.2, 9 MCR-2, 634 MCR-3, 456 MCR-4, 966 MCR-5) in 2046 genomes (166 from isolates and 1880 from MAGs), present in 1596 individuals from 41 different countries (7.2% from the total 21,866 in the study). It is important to note the restricted classification of MCR in the deepARG model 2, as it only assigns sequences up to MCR-5. Of the 2079 mcr-like genes, 215 (10.34%), were classified by PlasFlow to be located on plasmids, while 1239 MCRs are classified as chromosomally encoded, and 625 genes were in contigs without classification. To illustrate the prevalence and abundance of MCR-like sequences in different countries, we plotted the relative number of genes normalized by the total number of biosamples per country, with Haiti, South Korea, Norway and India identified as having the highest relative number of MCR-like sequences (Fig. 1). However, a quantitative comparison is not possible due to the unbalanced number of genomes from each country (from < 50 to > 50,000), randomness, and collection bias.

Fig. 1
figure1

Relative prevalence of mcr-like genes in countries with at least 50 genomes in the study. Bubble area shows the number of genes divided by the number of genomes from each country

A possible link between Sutterella and Parasutterella genus, and MCR genes

The genus Sutterella presented the largest number of mcr-like genes (667 homologs among 2555 Sutterella genomes in the UHGG), followed by Parasutterella (338 genes/1420 genomes) and the alphaproteobacterial genus CAG-495 (258 genes/1181 genomes) (Fig. 2). The genus Sutterella, mainly represented by the species S. wadsworthensis, is highly prevalent and abundant in the healthy human gut microbiota [52], while not generally considered pathogenic [53, 54]. Nevertheless, a link between this genus and autism in children was suggested [55], and a higher prevalence in prediabetics observed too [56], while the role of Sutterella therein remains unknown. Due to isolations from several inflamed body parts, S. wadsworthensis might be considered an opportunistic pathogen [57]. While AR has been detected in S. wadsworthensis, so far, there has been no report of colistin resistance in the Sutterella genus. One study reported a S. wadsworthensis strain as susceptible to colistin [58], however, this test was performed by disc diffusion which is known to be error-prone [59]. This suggests that colistin susceptibility of Sutterella strains from the human gut must be experimentally validated in the future. Similar to Sutterella, the Parasutterella genus, while sometimes linked to diseases, appear to be ordinary members of the human gut microbiota [60], pathogenic only in rare cases. The uncharacterized CAG-495 genus was reported to be abundant in patients diagnosed with the Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease [61]. Since so far, no reports on mcr-like genes in the here-mentioned three genera are published (most probably since there are few studies on human gut MAGs with deepARG), they should be investigated more thoroughly in the future when it comes to the spread of mcr-like genes in the human gut.

Fig. 2
figure2

Prevalence of mcr-like genes in different species (with 10 or more mcr-like genes) in MAGs and isolates

Mcr-like genes identified in potential pathogens

The main potentially pathogenic species carrying mcr-like genes were isolate strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and V. cholerae, Escherichia coli (only few pathogenic strains, mainly a commensal gut bacterium), and Campylobacter hominis, associated with Crohn’s disease and inflammatory bowel disease [62]. Most of these bacterial strains were isolated from sick individuals. MAGs from Vibrio species or E. coli strains most probably residing as commensal, non-pathogenic in the healthy human gut seem to very rarely contain mcr-like genes. Only one of the non-isolate MAGs encoding putative mcrs belonged to V. cholerae (GUT_GENOME140393, sample from Bangladesh) and E. coli (GUT_GENOME127555, sample from Mongolia). The prevalence of putative mcr genes among V. cholerae human gut MAGs is low, with only one occurrence out of 25. The predicted E. coli GUT_GENOME127555 mcr-gene was classified as mcr-4, which contrasts the usually detected mcr-1, mcr-2 and mcr-3 among the E. coli isolate genomes and has high similarity (96% identity) to the chromosomally encoded EptA of strain K12. A premature stop codon approximately 100 amino acids before the conserved stop codon might preclude the protein from synthesis though. This gene was classified as located in a plasmid by PlasFlow, yet this classification was difficult to verify manually due to the short contig size (4.1 kbp). Hence, it is difficult to predict whether this is a mobilized/plasmid-encoded or chromosomally stable mcr-like gene.

Among the Campylobacter genomes, those belonging to C. hominis species were all detected among MAGs and, while C. hominis is only rarely associated with diseases, the high occurrence of putative mcr-3/mcr-4 (10 out of 21 overall C. hominis MAGs) warrants further investigation. Of the 23 C. hominis MAGs in the UHGG catalog, the 10 encoding MCR-like proteins were derived from only two studies pointing to the clustered occurrence of C. hominis. Two mcr-like genes predicted to be located on plasmids with a high sequence identity to mcr-3 like genes were detected in enterobacterial species, but a sequence comparison to recently described mcr-10 sequences revealed that they can be assigned to this class, as described for other Enterobacter species [32, 63]. Both species from the UHGG, E. himalayensis and E. sesami (as designated in the genome-taxonomy database used by the UHGG), are described in the literature as Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. hoffmannii and E. asburiae, respectively [64]. Both species are linked to various infections, but their complicated phylogeny and strain-specific pathogenicity makes a specific disease-related prediction difficult. Some strains were reported to be colistin-resistant [65].

PAP2-MCR fusion proteins

A total of 1142, or 54.93% of the MCR-like proteins included a PAP2_like domain at the N-terminal end of their sequence (Fig. 3), indicating an unusual and not characterized fusion between these ORFs. Of the 1142 PAP2-MCR fusion proteins 795 were classified as mcr-5, 333 as mcr-4 and 14 as mcr-3 and most were detected in the genera Sutterella, Parasutterella, Duodenibacillus and the uncultivated CAG-521 genus. Eleven mcr-like genes which were predicted to be located on a plasmid (PlasFlow score ≥ 0.7) contained this PAP2-domain, all of them predicted in Sutterella wadsworthensis genomes as homologs to mcr-4 genes. While the PAP2-containing domain shares only weak similarity (31% amino acid sequence identity across 50% coverage of the E. coli sequence) to the hpap gene, which is located downstream mcr-1 of E. coli, the number and position of transmembrane helices is conserved (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

PAP2-domain in mcr-like gene from Sutterella wadsworthensis. Comparison with E. coli mcr-1 gene including the PAP2-like phosphatase gene downstream. PAP2-domains are colored turquoise, mcr-like gene/regions red. Predicted transmembrane helices (TMHMM 2.0 server) are indicated as black bars

Usually, PAP2 is found in a separate ORF downstream of the mcr gene, immediately adjacent to mcr-1 and mcr-6 genes [66]. However, PAP2 was always described as being encoded by a separate ORF. The encoded phosphatase is suggested to enhance colistin resistance and [67], being crucial for the MCR enzymatic action. The observation of a fused pap2-domain to an mcr-like gene was unexpected as this was not reported in any of the literature with regards to this gene. Further physiological studies should shed light on the functionality of these genes as conferring colistin resistance. In addition, this unusual genetic architecture could help classify mcr-like genes and might even allow insights into the evolution of mcr-like genes, especially in the human gut.

Multi-resistance potential of genomes carrying mcr-like genes

To assess and measure the multi-resistance potential of genomes and MAGs carrying mcr-like genes, we verified the existence of other ARGs detected by deepARG in genomes containing mcr-like genes. We identified a total of 22,746 ARGs (from 21 ARG classes and some unclassified) co-occurring with mcr-like genes, among which the most abundant classes were multidrug resistance (10,008 ARGs), beta-lactam (2271 ARGs) and glycopeptide (2261 ARGs) (Fig. 4). However, several of those sequences on the multidrug class are efflux proteins, and as discussed in our previous study [9], those are very hard to distinguish from other transporters that are not involved in antibiotic resistance.

Fig. 4
figure4

Number of ARGs per class co-occurring in the same genome with Mcr-like genes

Regarding the beta-lactam group, we identified 1138 penA, a penicillin-binding protein 2 (PBP 2) associated with reduced susceptibility to oral cephalosporins [65], and 673 pbp1-A and 129 pbp1-B that are also penicillin-binding proteins.

In addition, we identified 25 blaOXA (class D beta-lactamase capable of hydrolasing 3rd generation cephalosporins) [68], 3 blaCTX-M (a plasmid-encoded ESBL found in Enterobacteriaceae, likely acquired from the environmental bacteria Kluyvera spp. by HGT [69]), 2 blaTEM-153, 7 blaTLA-1 and 2 blaCFXA-6. The blaCTX-M enzymes have been found associated with insertion elements (ISEcp1) and transposable elements (for example, Tn402-like transposons). Many conjugative plasmids can transport these mobile elements, and consequently, these enzymes became the most prevalent ESBL [70, 71]. In Sutterella wadsworthensis, the species showing the highest level of mcr-like genes, ARGs related to fosmidomycin (PENA), beta-lactam (rosB) and glycopeptides (vanR) are the most prevalent (see dataset mcr_with_otherARGs_dataframe.tsv). Colistin is a last-resource antibiotic used against MDR bacteria with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL), which makes the investigation of the presence of those ARGs in genomes containing MCR-like sequences so important.

Phylogenetic reconstruction reveals a close relationship between MCR-like and clinical MCR genes

Phylogenetic reconstruction (Fig. 5) revealed that the protein sequences classified as MCR-4 and MCR-5 from Sutterella, Parasutterella, and CAG-521 grouped in a single clade with support value of 1, and clinical MCR-5 sequences in an adjacent clade, however these sequences could represent a new group of mcr. All the mcr-like sequences used to generate the tree were grouped with clinical MCRs instead of the outgroup eptA, providing additional evidence that those sequences are closer to mcr sequences than to eptA.

Fig. 5
figure5

Phylogenetic tree of MCR-like sequences. We used only sequences present in contigs classified as plasmids and we clusterized similar sequences with CD-HIT on 97% similarity. The phylogenetic informative regions were selected by BMGE and the Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree was calculated by PhyML 3.0 with the model selection performed by SMS (AIC method) and 100 bootstrap replicates to infer significance. We added clinical MCR sequences from NCBI to the analysis (preceded by an accession number starting with WP). UHGG sequences predicted to be located on a plasmid by PlasFlow contain the “plasmid” note

An additional phylogenetic reconstruction using all MCR proteins clustered at 99% identity revealed additional patterns regarding the diversity of these genes within the human resistome (Figure S1). Namely, this analysis confirmed the high prevalence of mcr-4 among Sutterella and mcr-5 among Duodenibacillus, while mcr-3 was widespread among multiple genera. Notably, the classification into MCR groups was not in complete agreement with the topology of the tree. This suggests that there are issues with the approaches used to classify sequences into the recognized groups, which warrants additional care from researchers when classifying these sequences and depositing them on reference databases. Another possibility is that of convergent evolution, which would suggest that MCRs might evolve to resemble the primary structure of MCRs from distinct groups under the correct evolutionary pressure. Another interesting feature revealed by this tree is the lack of separation between chromosome and plasmid encoded MCRs. This finding indicates recombination between chromosomes and plasmids involving MCRs, which seems to be a widespread trait not specific to any particular taxa.

Conclusions

This study uncovers the diversity of mcr-like genes in the human gut microbiome. We demonstrated the cosmopolitan distribution of these genes in human gut samples around the globe and the co-presence of other antibiotic resistance genes, including ESBLs. Also, we described mcr-like genes encoded in the same ORF with PAP2-like. Although these novel sequences increase our knowledge about the diversity and evolution of mcr-like genes, their activity has to be experimentally validated in the future.

Availability of data and materials

All the code used in this study is available at https://github.com/rcuadrat/human_microbiome_mcr and all the data is available at Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4399676).

Abbreviations

AIC:

Akaike information criterion

AR:

Antibiotics resistance

ARG:

Antibiotics resistance gene

BMGE :

Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy

ESBL:

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases

HGT:

Horizontal Gene Transfer

HGG:

Human Gastrointestinal Bacteria Genome Collection

LMIC:

Low and middle-income countries

MCR:

Mobilized colistin resistance

MDR:

Multi-drug-resistant

MAG:

Metagenomic Assembled Genome

ML:

Maximum likelihood

NCBI:

National Center for Biotechnology Information

ORF:

Open reading frame

SMS:

Smart Model Selection

UHGG:

Unified Human Gastrointestinal Genome

UHGP:

Unified Human Gastrointestinal Proteome

References

  1. 1.

    Nadimpalli M, Delarocque-Astagneau E, Love DC, Price LB, Huynh B-T, Collard J-M, et al. Combating global antibiotic resistance: emerging one health concerns in lower- and middle-income countries. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:963–9.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    van Hecke O, Wang K, Lee JJ, Roberts NW, Butler CC. Implications of antibiotic resistance for patients’ recovery from common infections in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:371–82.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gerver SM, Mihalkova M, Bion JF, Wilson APR, Chudasama D, Johnson AP, et al. Surveillance of bloodstream infections in intensive care units in England, may 2016–April 2017: epidemiology and ecology. J Hosp Infect. 2020;106:1–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Jean S-S, Ko W-C, Hsueh P-R. Susceptibility of clinical isolates of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and phenotypic non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae to ceftaroline in Taiwan: results from antimicrobial testing leadership and surveillance (AT). Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56:106016.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Stohr JJJM, Verweij JJ, Buiting AGM, Rossen JWA, Kluytmans JAJW. Within-patient plasmid dynamics in Klebsiella pneumoniae during an outbreak of a carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0233313.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Bitew A, Tsige E. High prevalence of multidrug-resistant and extended-Spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: a cross-sectional study at Arsho advanced medical laboratory, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Trop Med. 2020;2020:6167234.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Martínez EP, van Rosmalen J, Bustillos R, Natsch S, Mouton JW, Verbon A, et al. Trends, seasonality and the association between outpatient antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance among urinary bacteria in the Netherlands. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75:2314.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Cytryn E. The soil resistome: the anthropogenic, the native, and the unknown. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;63:18–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Cuadrat RRC, Sorokina M, Andrade BG, Goris T, Dávila AMR. Global Ocean resistome revealed: exploring antibiotic resistance gene abundance and distribution in TARA oceans samples. Gigascience. 2020;9:giaa046.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lim S-K, Kim D, Moon D-C, Cho Y, Rho M. Antibiotic resistomes discovered in the gut microbiomes of Korean swine and cattle. GigaScience. 2020;9:giaa043.

  11. 11.

    Carr VR, Witherden EA, Lee S, Shoaie S, Mullany P, Proctor GB, et al. Abundance and diversity of resistomes differ between healthy human oral cavities and gut. Nat Commun. 2020;11:693.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liu L, Chen X, Skogerbø G, Zhang P, Chen R, He S, et al. The human microbiome: a hot spot of microbial horizontal gene transfer. Genomics. 2012;100:265–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Boto L, Pineda M, Pineda R. Potential impacts of horizontal gene transfer on human health and physiology and how anthropogenic activity can affect it. FEBS J. 2019;286:3959–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Capita R, Alonso-Calleja C. Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria: a challenge for the food industry. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2013;53:11–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Baron SA, Diene SM, Rolain J-M. Human microbiomes and antibiotic resistance. Hum Microbiome J. 2018;10:43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Dave M, Higgins PD, Middha S, Rioux KP. The human gut microbiome: current knowledge, challenges, and future directions. Transl Res. 2012;160:246–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bengtsson-Palme J, Angelin M, Huss M, Kjellqvist S, Kristiansson E, Palmgren H, et al. The human gut microbiome as a transporter of antibiotic resistance genes between continents. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59:6551–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Almeida A, Mitchell AL, Boland M, Forster SC, Gloor GB, Tarkowska A, et al. A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2019;568:499–504.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Pasolli E, Asnicar F, Manara S, Zolfo M, Karcher N, Armanini F, et al. Extensive unexplored human microbiome diversity revealed by over 150,000 genomes from metagenomes spanning age, geography, and lifestyle. Cell. 2019;176:649–662.e20.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Nayfach S, Shi ZJ, Seshadri R, Pollard KS, Kyrpides NC. New insights from uncultivated genomes of the global human gut microbiome. Nature. 2019;568:505–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Almeida A, Nayfach S, Boland M, Strozzi F, Beracochea M, Shi ZJ, et al. A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39:105–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zhao R, Yu K, Zhang J, Zhang G, Huang J, Ma L, et al. Deciphering the mobility and bacterial hosts of antibiotic resistance genes under antibiotic selection pressure by metagenomic assembly and binning approaches. Water Res. 2020;186:116318.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zafer MM, El-Mahallawy HA, Abdulhak A, Amin MA, Al-Agamy MH, Radwan HH. Emergence of colistin resistance in multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli strains isolated from cancer patients. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2019;18:40.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rossi F, Girardello R, Cury AP, Di Gioia TSR, de Almeida JN, Duarte AJ da S. Emergence of colistin resistance in the largest university hospital complex of São Paulo, Brazil, over five years. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2017;21:98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Giamarellou H. Epidemiology of infections caused by polymyxin-resistant pathogens. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2016;48:614–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Berglund B. Acquired resistance to Colistin via chromosomal and plasmid-mediated mechanisms in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infect Microbes Dis. 2019;1:10–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Liu Y-Y, Wang Y, Walsh TR, Yi L-X, Zhang R, Spencer J, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:161–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Xavier BB, Lammens C, Ruhal R, Kumar-Singh S, Butaye P, Goossens H, et al. Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr-2, in Escherichia coli , Belgium, June 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:30280.

  29. 29.

    Yin W, Li H, Shen Y, Liu Z, Wang S, Shen Z, et al. Novel Plasmid-Mediated Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-3 in Escherichia coli. mBio. 2017;8:mBio.00543-17, e00543-17.

  30. 30.

    Carattoli A, Villa L, Feudi C, Curcio L, Orsini S, Luppi A, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mcr-4 gene in Salmonella and Escherichia coli, Italy 2013, Spain and Belgium, 2015 to 2016. Eurosurveillance. 2017;22:30589.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Borowiak M, Fischer J, Hammerl JA, Hendriksen RS, Szabo I, Malorny B. Identification of a novel transposon-associated phosphoethanolamine transferase gene, mcr-5, conferring colistin resistance in d-tartrate fermenting Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi B. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:3317–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wang C, Feng Y, Liu L, Wei L, Kang M, Zong Z. Identification of novel mobile colistin resistance gene mcr-10. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020;9:508–16.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Carroll LM, Gaballa A, Guldimann C, Sullivan G, Henderson LO, Wiedmann M. Identification of Novel Mobilized Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-9 in a Multidrug-Resistant, Colistin-Susceptible Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhimurium Isolate. mBio. 2019;10:e00853-19, /mbio/10/3/mBio.00853-19.atom.

  34. 34.

    Wang X, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Li J, Yin W, Wang S, et al. Emergence of a novel mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-8 , in NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018;7:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yang Y-Q, Li Y-X, Lei C-W, Zhang A-Y, Wang H-N. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-7.1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:1791–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    AbuOun M, Stubberfield EJ, Duggett NA, Kirchner M, Dormer L, Nunez-Garcia J, et al. mcr-1 and mcr-2 (mcr-6.1) variant genes identified in Moraxella species isolated from pigs in Great Britain from 2014 to 2015. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72:2745–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wei W, Srinivas S, Lin J, Tang Z, Wang S, Ullah S, et al. Defining ICR-Mo, an intrinsic colistin resistance determinant from Moraxella osloensis. Hughes D, editor. PLOS Genet. 2018;14:e1007389.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Economou V, Gousia P. Agriculture and food animals as a source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. IDR. 2015;:49.

  39. 39.

    Zhang H, Hou M, Xu Y, Srinivas S, Huang M, Liu L, et al. Action and mechanism of the colistin resistance enzyme MCR-4. Commun Biol. 2019;2:36.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Watts J, Schreier H, Lanska L, Hale M. The rising tide of antimicrobial resistance in aquaculture: sources. Sinks and Solutions Mar Drugs. 2017;15:158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Arango-Argoty G, Garner E, Pruden A, Heath LS, Vikesland P, Zhang L. DeepARG: a deep learning approach for predicting antibiotic resistance genes from metagenomic data. Microbiome. 2018;6:23.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Krawczyk PS, Lipinski L, Dziembowski A. PlasFlow: predicting plasmid sequences in metagenomic data using genome signatures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:e35 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29346586.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22:1658–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Lemoine F, Correia D, Lefort V, Doppelt-Azeroual O, Mareuil F, Cohen-Boulakia S, et al. NGPhylogeny.fr: new generation phylogenetic services for non-specialists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:W260–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Criscuolo A, Gribaldo S. BMGE (block mapping and gathering with entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol Biol. 2010;10:210.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol. 2010;59:307–21 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20525638.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lefort V, Longueville J-E, Gascuel O. SMS: smart model selection in PhyML. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2422–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Potter SC, Luciani A, Eddy SR, Park Y, Lopez R, Finn RD. HMMER web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:W200–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hiippala K, Kainulainen V, Kalliomäki M, Arkkila P, Satokari R. Mucosal Prevalence and Interactions with the Epithelium Indicate Commensalism of Sutterella spp. Front Microbiol. 2016;7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01706.

  53. 53.

    Mukhopadhya I, Hansen R, Nicholl CE, Alhaidan YA, Thomson JM, Berry SH, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of colonic mucosal isolates of sutterella wadsworthensis from inflammatory bowel disease. Bereswill S, editor. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27076.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Cheng J, Kalliomäki M, Heilig HG, Palva A, Lähteenoja H, de Vos WM, et al. Duodenal microbiota composition and mucosal homeostasis in pediatric celiac disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:113.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ho LKH, Tong VJW, Syn N, Nagarajan N, Tham EH, Tay SK, et al. Gut microbiota changes in children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Gut Pathog. 2020;12:6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Allin KH, Tremaroli V, Caesar R, Jensen BAH, Damgaard MTF, Bahl MI, et al. Aberrant intestinal microbiota in individuals with prediabetes. Diabetologia. 2018;61:810–20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Finegold SM, Jousimies-Somer H. Recently described clinically important anaerobic bacteria: medical aspects. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;25:S88–93.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Warren YA, Citron DM, Merriam CV, Goldstein EJC. Biochemical differentiation and comparison of Desulfovibrio species and other phenotypically similar genera. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:4041–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Tan TY. Comparison of three standardized disc susceptibility testing methods for colistin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58:864–7 Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jac/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jac/dkl330.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Ju T, Kong JY, Stothard P, Willing BP. Defining the role of Parasutterella, a previously uncharacterized member of the core gut microbiota. ISME J. 2019;13:1520–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ye Z, Wu C, Zhang N, Du L, Cao Q, Huang X, et al. Altered gut microbiome composition in patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease. Gut Microbes. 2020;11:539–55.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Man SM. The clinical importance of emerging campylobacter species. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;8:669–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lei C-W, Zhang Y, Wang Y-T, Wang H-N. Detection of Mobile Colistin Resistance Gene mcr-10.1 in a Conjugative Plasmid from Enterobacter roggenkampii of Chicken Origin in China. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2020;64. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01191-20.

  64. 64.

    Zong Z. Genome-based taxonomy for Bacteria: a recent advance. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28:871–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zong Z, Feng Y, McNally A. Carbapenem and Colistin Resistance in Enterobacter: Determinants and Clones. Trends Microbiol. 2021;29:473–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.12.009.

  66. 66.

    Gallardo A, Ugarte-Ruiz M, Hernández M, Miguela-Villoldo P, Rodríguez-Lázaro D, Domínguez L, et al. Involvement of hpap2 and dgkA genes in Colistin resistance mediated by mcr determinants. Antibiotics. 2020;9:531.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Choi Y, Lee J-Y, Lim S-K, Ko KS. Intact pap2 downstream of mcr-1 appears to be required for colistin resistance. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;97:114997.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Munita JM, Arias CA. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.VMBF-0016-2015.

  69. 69.

    Bonnet R. Growing Group of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamases: the CTX-M enzymes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1–14.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Cantón R, González-Alba JM, Galán JC. CTX-M Enzymes: Origin and Diffusion. Front Microbio. 2012;3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2012.00110.

  71. 71.

    Partridge SR, Kwong SM, Firth N, Jensen SO. Mobile Genetic Elements Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance. Clin Microbiol Reviews. 2018;31:e00088-17, /cmr/31/4/e00088-17.atom.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Maria Sorokina and also the colleagues in DIfE for the meaningful discussions during the elaboration of this text.

Funding

This research has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 801522, by Science Foundation Ireland and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund through the ADAPT Centre for Digital Content Technology grant number 13/RC/2106. FHC was supported by APOSTD/2018/186 post-doctoral fellowships from Generalitat Valenciana. The work of Tobias Goris was supported by European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement no. 814650 for the project SynBio4Flav. The funding body provided funds for the salary of the authors but had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and writing of the manuscript. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BGNA and RRCC collected and analyzed the data and wrote the paper. TG and FHC analyzed the data and generated phylogenetic trees. BGNA, TG, HA, FHC and AMRD and RRCC revised and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael R. C. Cuadrat.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Phylogenetic tree of MCR-like sequences. We clusterized similar sequences with CD-HIT on 99% similarity. Only sequences displaying both the complete EptA_B_N and sulfatase domains were used. Aligned sequences were concatenated and used for phylogenetic reconstruction through IQ-Tree v1.6.12 using the LG + R8 model. Bootstrap analysis was performed with 1000 replicates. The final tree was visualized and decorated using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) software (https://itol.embl.de/).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Andrade, B.G.N., Goris, T., Afli, H. et al. Putative mobilized colistin resistance genes in the human gut microbiome. BMC Microbiol 21, 220 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02281-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Colistin
  • Human microbiome
  • MCR
  • Metagenomics
  • Antibiotic resistance genes