Skip to main content

Analysis of culturable airborne fungi in outdoor environments in Tianjin, China



Fungal spores dispersed in the atmosphere may become cause of different pathological conditions and allergies for human beings. A number of studies have been performed to analyze the diversity of airborne fungi in different environments worldwide, and in particular in many urban areas in China. We investigated, for the first time, the diversity, concentration and distribution of airborne fungi in Tianjin city. We sampled 8 outdoor environments, using open plate method, during a whole winter season. Isolated fungi were identified by morphological and molecular analysis. Environmental factors which could influence the airborne fungi concentration (temperature, humidity, wind speed, and air pressure) were monitored and analyzed. The effect of different urban site functions (busy areas with high traffic flow and commercial activities vs. green areas) on airborne fungal diversity was also analyzed.


A total of 560 fungal strains, belonging to 110 species and 49 genera of Ascomycota (80 %), Basidiomycota (18 %), and Mucoromycota (2 %) were isolated in this study. The dominant fungal genus was Alternaria (22 %), followed by Cladosporium (18.4 %), Naganishia (14.1 %), Fusarium (5.9 %), Phoma (4.11 %), and Didymella (4.8 %). A fungal concentration ranging from 0 to 3224.13 CFU m− 3 was recorded during the whole study. Permutational multivariate analysis showed that the month was the most influential factor for airborne fungal community structure, probably because it can be regarded as a proxy of environmental variables, followed by wind speed. The two analyzed environments (busy vs. green) had no detectable effect on the air fungal community, which could be related to the relatively small size of parks in Tianjin and/or to the study season.


Our study shed light on the highly diverse community of airborne fungi characterizing the outdoor environments of Tianjin, and clarified the role that different environmental factors played in shaping the analyzed fungal community. The dominant presence of fungi with potential hazardous effect on human health, such as Alternaria, Cladosporium and Naganishia, deserves further attention. Our results may represent a valuable source of information for air quality monitoring, microbial pollution control, and airborne diseases prevention.

Peer Review reports


Fungi are one of the most abundant, widely distributed and pervasive group of organisms on Earth [1]. These organisms are ubiquitous in nature, playing different roles in the environment as symbionts, saprotrophs or parasites, which enable them to colonize diverse habitats [2]. Fungal presence in the ecosystem reaches tremendous levels, being fungi estimated to comprise approximately 25 % of the global biomass [3, 4]. Spores of different fungal species are dispersed in the atmosphere hence, airborne fungi play a critical role in air pollution [5], which can alter biotic and/or abiotic factors of the environment, thus affecting human health [6]. The diversity and concentration of airborne fungi in a certain area depend on environmental condition, human activity and availability of substrate for fungal growth [7, 8]. Fungal invasion of human body may lead to many pathological conditions and allergies. Until now, approximately 150 allergy causing fungal taxa have been identified [9], while about 10 % of the world population is suspected to have fungal allergies [10,11,12,13]. The myriad health effects of fungi on humans, plants and livestock are well recognized [14], including severe diseases of human respiratory system [1, 13]. Effects of airborne fungi on human health have stimulated researchers to study the diversity of aeroallergens, which has led to the identification of nearly 80 genera of fungi mainly responsible for respiratory ailments or anomalies [10, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Over 100 fungal species are known to cause serious animal and human infections [2, 24]. Alternaria, Penicillium, Aspergillus and Cladosporium are among the airborne fungal genera responsible for allergic rhinitis or asthma [5, 8, 10, 25, 26]. Airborne fungi are also suspected to be one of the causes of lung cancer. Aflatoxin B1 produced by Aspergillus flavus was found to cause liver and lung cancer when the fungus entered the respiratory tract by ingestion or inhalation [27,28,29,30,31]. Some of the less severe infectious diseases caused by fungi include aspergillosis [32], hypersensitivity diseases, such as hypersensitivity pneumonitis and asthma [33, 34], and toxicosis reactions, including acute systemic toxicosis [35]. Aspergillus fumigatus is responsible for about 90 % of all the invasive aspergillosis, while A. niger causes a range of invasive pulmonary diseases [36]. Exposure to the airborne fungi was found to be associated with respiratory allergy symptoms, asthma exacerbation and asthma complication leading to respiratory failure and death [37,38,39]. Knowledge about the identity and relative frequencies of airborne fungi in the environment is necessary to evaluate potential health hazards [5].

Nowadays, the global research on aeroallergens is considered of primary importance by scholars and researchers, resulting in a large body of literature available on airborne fungi [6, 8, 40]. Numerous scientific studies have been conducted on outdoor microorganisms in China and reported on national and international forums over the past several years. Airborne fungi concentrations are monitored in many Chinese cities, including Baoding [41], Beijing [26, 42,43,44], Hangzhou [40], Nanjing [45], Shenzhen [46], Tainan [1, 47], and Xi’an [48, 49]. These studies have increased our basic knowledge on the diversity of airborne fungi in the environment and have provided data on some important issues related to public health [40]. The study of disease-causing airborne fungi can help in the medical evaluations, assessment of health issues, development of remedies, and assist in the proactive air quality monitoring [5].

Air pollution does not only affect the human health by creating pathological conditions, allergies and other health related problems, but also has a negative influence on the socioeconomic development process to a significant level in most of the northern cities of China [44]. Tianjin is the third biggest municipality and the Northern China’s leading manufacturing centre and port [50]. Currently, there are no data available on the diversity of airborne fungi comparing the different urban environments in Tianjin. Our study aimed at contributing to the knowledge of airborne fungi in Tianjin, with the assessment of the diversity of culturable strains, using the open plate sampling method in different outdoor environments. We described diversity, concentration, distribution, and relative frequency of culturable airborne fungi in eight different sampling sites in Tianjin. We also analyzed the influence of several environmental factors on the studied fungal community. Results from the present research could provide support in pollution control and environmental protection in urban environments.


A total of 560 different fungal strains belonging to 110 species and 49 genera of Ascomycota (80 %), Basidiomycota (18 %), and Mucoromycota (2 %) were identified from the 8 analyzed sites in 4 urban districts in Tianjin (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table S3). Among the dominant fungal genera, approximately 22 % of the total identified strains belonged to the genus Alternaria, followed by Cladosporium 18.4 %, Naganishia 14.1 %, Fusarium 5.9 %, Phoma 4.11 %, and Didymella 4.8 % (Supplementary Table S4). The most frequently occurring fungal species were Alternaria alternata (13.4 %), Cladosporium cladosporioides (9.6 %), Alternaria tenuissima (7.5 %), Naganishia albida (6.4 %), and N. globosa (6.1 %), followed by Didymella pedeiae (2.7 %), Fusarium verticillioides (2.7 %), F. equiseti (2.3 %), C. tenuissimum (2.3 %), Valsa sordida (2.3 %), C. anthropophilum (1.8 %) (Supplementary Table S5). The genus Cladosporium showed the highest species richness of the whole airborne fungal community, with 13 identified species, 12 % of total recorded taxa. Alternaria, represented by 8 species (7 %), was the second most species-rich genus, followed by Naganishia (7 species, 6 %), while 6 species (5.5 %) were found to represent each of the genera Aspergillus, Didymella, Fusarium, and Phoma.

Fig. 1

Total fungal strains isolated from each location

The highest number of strains was recorded in March (241), followed by February (165), while January and December sampling yielded a considerably lower number of isolates, with a total of 74 and 80 strains respectively (Supplementary Table S2). Overall, 55.5 and 44.5 % colonies were isolated from busy and green sites, respectively (Fig. 2). Concerning the two culture media used in this study, 47.5 % colonies were isolated on SDA, whereas 52.5 % fungal strains were obtained on MEA (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2

Isolated strains based on site

Fig. 3

Isolated strains based on growth media

A varying fungal concentration was observed at each location in each month as shown in Table 1. The concentration of outdoor culturable airborne fungi ranged from 0 CFU m− 3 to 3224.13 CFU m− 3, with an average of 625 CFU m− 3 and 720 CFU m− 3 recorded for SDA and MEA media, respectively.

Table 1 Fungal colony average concentration detected in Tianjin outdoor environments

The environmental parameters recorded in this study (Supplementary Table S1) showed different effect on the analysed fungal diversity. According to permutational multivariate analysis month had the greatest impact (Adonis: F3,17 = 3.57) to airborne fungal community structure, followed by wind speed (F1,17 = 2,13) when included simultaneously in the model (Table 2). Wind, humidity, and temperature had a similar effect when tested one by one in the model. Surprisingly, the two different environments analyzed in each district (green vs. busy) and growth media had no detectable effect on the airborne fungal community. Since culture medium did not affected fungal community structure, observations divided by the media were collapsed in order to avoid pseudoreplication in further community analyses.

Table 2 Permutational multivariate analysis showing the effects of location, weather and month on fungal community abundance


This is the first study on culturable airborne fungi in Tianjin City, China. The research project was carried out to investigate the concentration, identity and diversity of airborne fungi present in the outdoor environments of the studied city. The 4 analyzed urban districts, each comprising a green and a busy site, showed a high airborne fungal diversity, which resulted in the isolation of 560 strains belonging to 110 fungal species in 49 genera. Previous studies have shown the presence of less diverse culturable airborne fungal communities, compare to Tianjin, in other cities of China, such as Beijing, where 40 species belonging to 14 genera were recorded [26], Hangzhou, with 85 species in 21 genera [40], and Shenzhen (27 species, 18 genera) [46]. Overall, a fungal concentration ranging from 0 to 3224.13 CFU m− 3 was recorded across the eight different analyzed sites in Tianjin. The average concentration was 625 CFU m− 3 on SDA medium and 720 CFU m− 3 on MEA (Table 1). Many studies have reported various concentrations of airborne fungi across cities in different countries [5, 40, 51, 52], in some cases showing that the outdoor environment fungal diversity and concentration depended on the traffic flow, human activities and vegetation presence [52,53,54]. For example, in a study conducted in different regions of the US, Shelton et al. [5] reported a median outdoor fungal concentration of 500 CFU m− 3, while Kalyoncu et al. [51] found a fungal concentration of 412 CFU m− 3 in eight different environments within Yunusemre City, in Turkey. Numerous studies have reported on the outdoor airborne fungal concentrations in different cities of China. Fang et al. [42] observed a fungal concentration ranging from 4.8 × 102 CFU m− 3 to 2.4 × 104 CFU m− 3 in three different sampling sites in Beijing, whereas the concentration of culturable fungi in the air was found to range from < 12 to 8767 CFU m− 3 (mean value 848 CFU m− 3) in a study performed in Hangzhou, in four sampling locations characterized by different urban functions [40].

The most abundant fungal genera found in our analyzed environments included Alternaria, Cladosporium, and Naganishia (Supplementary Tables S4 and S5). Alternaria and Cladosporium have been similarly reported as the most common airborne fungi in other research studies performed in Nanjing, Beijing and Hangzhou [26, 40, 45]. Alternaria was the dominant genus recorded in Tianjin, comprising almost one fourth of all the isolated airborne fungal strains. Among the recorded Alternaria species, A. alternata, which was the most frequently occurring taxon of the whole study, is known as a common and widespread allergenic fungus, responsible for Immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated respiratory diseases, specifically for asthma exacerbation [55]. Besides, 16 allergens of A. alternata have been overall reported so far [56, 57]. Cladosporium was recorded as the second most common genus in Tianjin air environments. Cladosporium species are mostly saprotrophic [58], but have been occasionally described as opportunistic causative agents of infections in animals and humans [59, 60]. In a study performed by Sellart et al. [61] in Spain, where nasal samples of 135 people (healthy and allergic) were analyzed, Cladosporium was reported as the prevalent fungal genus in nasal microbiota, being C. herbarum and C. cladosporioides the most abundant species (23.6 %). Ma et al. [62], in another clinical study carried out in China, reported C. cladosporioides as a cause of Phaeohyphomycotic dermatitis in giant panda. The genus Naganishia, showing the third highest concentration in our results, can be considered a peculiar presence in Tianjin outdoor environments, as this genus was not reported in any other study on airborne fungi conducted in China. Naganishia albida, which accounted for 6.4 % of total isolated strains in this work, was reported as the cause of Otomycosis [63] and superficial skin infection [64] in case studies performed in Iran. The presence of N. albida in Tianjin air samples deserves further attention as a potential threat for human health. Long-term monitoring of this fungal species distribution and abundance in both outdoor and indoor Tianjin city environments is recommended.

Previous studies have shown that environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, wind speed and atmospheric pressure could affect the diversity of airborne fungi in different environments [58]. The analyses performed in our work revealed that wind had the highest influence on fungal community, among the studied environmental factors. This result is in agreement with previous works showing that wind enhanced the release and dispersal of fungal spores, by favoring the removal of spores from fruit bodies and their transportation and suspension in the air [65, 66]. Other environmental factors analyzed in our study, including temperature, humidity and atmospheric pressure showed a lower, but still significant effect on diversity and concentration of airborne fungi. Looking at the numerous aeromycological studies on the influence of meteorological factors on airborne fungal concentration that have been published [65,66,67,68,69,70], the results of our work are in agreement with findings from Giri et al. [65] who observed a very significant effect of atmospheric pressure and wind speed on particulate matter concentration as compared to temperature and relative humidity. Similar results were obtained by Santiago et al. [71] who studied the effect of meteorological factors on outdoor airborne fungi, using both culture-based methods and direct microscopic analysis of fungi. In the latter work, a significant correlation between fungal colony growth and relative humidity and wind speed was recorded. Some previous studies, instead, reported a major influence of temperature and humidity on the diversity of air borne fungi. For instance, in the work performed by Fang et al. [40] in Hangzhou, air temperature was found to sustain fungal growth and germination in all seasons except winter, whereas a study carried out in Beijing, showed that both air temperature and humidity in summer and autumn were more appropriate for fungal propagation as compared to winter season [26]. A strong relationship between fungal growth and relative humidity was reported by Jones and Harrison [72], who showed that the humidity in the air could support different mycelial structures growth in fungi, ultimately resulting in the increase in fungal air-borne concentration. In a study performed in Nepal, the atmospheric pressure was found to affect the suspension, dispersal, and sedimentation of particulate matter in the air [65], which was later interpreted by Pyrri et al. [73] to support the hypothesis that high atmospheric pressure combined with elevated temperature may increase the suspension of fungal spores in the air, and prevent their sedimentation. Further studies based on large-scale sampling and long-term data collection are necessary to disentangle the effect of different environmental factors affecting the diversity and structure of air borne fungal communities.

In our study, we also tried to understand the effect of different urban district management on the outdoor fungal diversity. We did not observe any significant difference in the concentration of airborne fungi in green vs. busy sites, according to the results of statistical analysis. Different studies have previously suggested a strong association between vegetation coverage and concentration of airborne fungi in outdoor environments. For instance, a study conducted by Fang et al. [26] has shown that the airborne fungi in green areas in Beijing were more diverse than in densely populated and polluted areas. Other studies have reported that areas with more abundant presence of green plants were characterized by higher concentration of airborne fungi [26, 40, 43, 66]. In particular, Picco et al. [66] have found that the presence and growth of parasitic and saprophytic fungi in green areas were supported by phylloplane (leaf surface) availability. The contrasting results obtained from our work could be explained with the relatively small size characterizing the green areas in Tianjin, which could result in a strong influence of surrounding busy areas, thus making the fungal communities inside and outside parks similar. Besides, given that our study was performed during the winter season, when the great majority of plant did not bear leaves, due to the climatic conditions in Tianjin, it is possible that the limited phylloplane availability reduced the effect of leaf surface on fungal diversity registered in the above-mentioned previous studies [66]. Further analyses of Tianjin air bone fungi in different seasons could be useful to test the latter hypothesis. However, the percentage of total species isolated each month in our study registered a noteworthy shift in the fourth month of sampling (March 2020, Fig. 2) when busy sites showed a significantly higher fungal concentration than green sites, never observed in the previous three months. We cannot exclude that the nationally adopted lockdown, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, had some influence on the latter result. Indeed, we observed a much more intense activity and presence of people in the busy sites during the last month of sampling, when the restrictions related to the lockdown became smaller. This increased activity within the busy sites could have had some effect on the concentration of air borne fungi, although it is also possible that other environmental factors not measured in our study were involved in the observed results variation.


In this study, we shed light on the highly diverse community of airborne fungi characterizing the outdoor environments of Tianjin City. We clarified the role that different environmental factors played in shaping the analyzed fungal community, and revealed the particularly strong effect of the wind on Tianjin air borne fungal diversity and concentration. Our effort to compare fungal communities in busy and green urban areas did not show substantial difference between the two investigated environments. This finding could be related to the relatively small size of parks in Tianjin and/or to the study season, hypotheses that require further studies to be tested. Among the identified cultured fungi, the dominant presence of strains belonging to Alternaria, Cladosporium and Naganishia genera may constitute an important feature of Tianjin outdoor environments, which deserves to be studied from a pathological point of view, due to the potential hazardous effect of these fungal taxa on human health. The results from our study may represent a valuable source of information for air quality monitoring, microbial pollution control, and airborne diseases prevention. Further studies are needed to generate additional data from long-term sampling, in order to increase our understanding of air borne fungal population dynamics and composition in Tianjin, across different seasons.

Materials and methods

Sampling sites

This study was conducted in Tianjin city, located in the North-Est of China (39°8’31.99"N, 117°10’36.01"E). The city was built in 1403 on the banks of Hai River at West of Bohai Sea, South of Yanshan Mountains and East to Beijing. It occupies 11,946 km squared land area with an approximated population of 13,589,078 as of 2020, distributed in 15 districts and three counties. Tianjin ranked 29th in world’s largest human agglomeration, 4th largest urban population in China and 11th in the world’s most populous city [74].

Eight sites, across 4 urban districts in Tianjin city, were investigated in this study. Two distinct sampling environments were selected in each district, one constituted by an open busy area with high commercial activities and traffic flow (busy site) and the other representative of green areas in urban parks (green site), as presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Detailed information of the eight selected sampling sites in Tianjin

Sampling method and culture media

Sampling of fungi in bio-aerosols at the study sites was conducted for four consecutive months, from December 2019 to March 2020. Air samples were collected monthly, when the weather was dry and stable, approximately between 12:00–13:00 o’clock. Airborne fungi were sampled using the open plate method [2, 46, 75], by opening sterile plates containing media for 10 min at a height of 1.5 m above ground, which is representative of the human breathing zone. Minimum distance of 1 m from walls and obstacles was maintained. For each air sampling, 2 petri dishes of 9.0 cm diameter, one containing Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA), another containing Malt Extract Agar (MEA) medium, amended with chloramphenicol (100 mg/L) to inhibit bacterial growth, were used. Environmental parameters including temperature, humidity, wind speed and air pressure were recorded using Huafeng-AccuWeather software at each sampling site. Exposed culture dishes were incubated at 25 °C, in the darkness, and examined for fungal colony growth every 24 h, for 5–7 days. Fungal colonies were observed and counted in each plate. Each colony was carefully picked up, and aseptically inoculated in a new plate for isolation. Fungal morphology was observed in pure cultures, and isolated strains were identified using molecular method. All isolated fungal strains were deposited in the LP Culture Collection (personal culture collection held in the laboratory of Prof. Lorenzo Pecoraro), at the School of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China.

Enumeration of fungi

After incubation and counting of fungal colonies, the concentration obtained from the samples was expressed as CFU per cubic meter of air (CFU m− 3). Omelyansky formula [76, 77] was used to calculate the fungal concentration in unit CFU m− 3:

$$\mathrm N=5\mathrm a\times104\left(\mathrm{bt}\right)^{-1}$$

where “N” is the concentration of fungi, “a” is the number of fungal colonies per plate, “b” is the total area of the plate (cm2); and “t” is the time duration for opening of plate (min).

Fungal identification

The isolated fungal colonies were identified using DNA-based molecular analysis combined with microscopy. DNA extraction was performed using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method [78]. The amplification of fungal rRNA genes internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region was performed using the following universal primer set: ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) [55]. The reaction mixture for PCR (50 µl), consisted of 25.0 µl of 2 × Rapid Taq Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech Co. Ltd, Nanjing), 2 µl of forward primer (10 µM), 2 µl of reverse primer (10 µM) and 2.0 µl (20 ng DNA) of template and 19 µl of double distilled sterilized water. The amplification program was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, 30–35 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 60 °C for 15 s, extension at 72 °C for 15 s, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were detected by gel electrophoresis using electrophoresis tank (LiuYi, Beijing) on a 1 % agarose gel. The sequences were obtained from Genewiz, Inc., China, and analyzed with the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) program of the National Center for Biotechnology Information, USA ( in order to identify the closest sequence in the NCBI database. DNA sequences were deposited in GenBank (Accession Nos. MW723617–MW724176).

Fungal morphology (branched septate hyphae, pseudohyphae, conidiophores, conidia, poroconidia, arthroconidia and sporangiosphores, etc.) was examined under Nikon ECLIPSE Ci microscope for identification of isolates following the standard taxonomic keys for different taxa [79,80,81,82,83].

Statistical analysis

The frequency of fungal species in petri dishes per site was used in community-level analyses. Wind and temperature values were log-transformed before analyses in order to reduce heteroscedasticity. To address the relative importance of media and environmental factors on the community structure of airborne fungi, we used a multivariate ANOVA as implemented in the Adonis routine of the Vegan package of R [84]. Prior to permutational multivariate analysis, abundance data was transformed into binary format and the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity metric was used to calculate the community distance matrix. Adjusted R-squares were calculated in the final model.

In order to summarize descriptive statistics of fungal concentrations, results were calculated using Excel 2016 software. ANOVA was used for comparing fungal concentrations between different fungal samples and sampling times while the means were separated using Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) in SPSS Version 20.0 (Standard Version, SPSS Inc.) software.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article. The Fungal DNA sequences amplified during this study are available in GenBank under accessions MW723617–MW724176.


  1. 1.

    Pei-Chih W, Huey-Jen S, Chia-Yin L. Characteristics of indoor and outdoor airborne fungi at suburban and urban homes in two seasons. Sci Total Environ. 2000;253(1–3):111–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Cvetnić Z, Pepeljnjak S. Distribution and mycotoxin-producing ability of some fungal isolates from the air. Atmospheric Environment. 1997;31(3):491–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Miller JD. Fungi as contaminants in indoor air. Atmospheric Environment Part A General Topics. 1992;26(12):2163–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sorenson WG. Fungal spores: Hazardous to health? Environ. Health Perspect. 1999;107(3):469–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Shelton BG, Kirkland KH, Flanders WD, Morris GK. Profiles of airborne fungi in buildings and outdoor environments in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(4):1743–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sivagnanasundaram P, Amarasekara RWK, Madegedara RMD, Ekanayake A, Magana-Arachchi DN. Assessment of Airborne Bacterial and Fungal Communities in Selected Areas of Teaching Hospital, Kandy, Sri Lanka. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:7393926.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kurup VP, Shen H-D, Banerjee B. Respiratory fungal allergy. Microb Infect. 2000;2(9):1101–10.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Adhikari A, Sen MM, Gupta-Bhattacharya S, Chanda S. Airborne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: a 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations. Sci Total Environ. 2004;326(1–3):123–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Simon-Nobbe B, Denk U, Pöll V, Rid R, Breitenbach M. The spectrum of fungal allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immun. 2008;145(1):58–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Horner W, Helbling A, Salvaggio J, Lehrer S. Fungal allergens. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8(2):161–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Burge HA. Fungi: toxic killers or unavoidable nuisances? Annals of Allergy. Asthma Immunol. 2001;87(6):52–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yamamoto N, Hospodsky D, Dannemiller KC, Nazaroff WW, Peccia J. Indoor emissions as a primary source of airborne allergenic fungal particles in classrooms. Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(8):5098–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lee S, Kang S, Bivila CP, Yoon C, Yang J, Yamamoto N. Removal of viable airborne fungi from indoor environments by benzalkonium chloride-based aerosol disinfectants. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2015;21(8):2174–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Barberán A, Ladau J, Leff JW, Pollard KS, Menninger HL, Dunn RR, et al. Continental-scale distributions of dust-associated bacteria and fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(18):5756-61.

  15. 15.

    Mendell MJ, Mirer AG, Cheung K, Tong M, Douwes J. Respiratory and allergic health effects of dampness, mold, and dampness-related agents: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(6):748–56.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Stark PC, Celedón JC, Chew GL, Ryan LM, Burge HA, Muilenberg ML, et al. Fungal levels in the home and allergic rhinitis by 5 years of age. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(10):1405–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu AH. Something old, something new: indoor endotoxin, allergens and asthma. Paediatr Resp Rev. 2004;5:S65–71.

  18. 18.

    Latge JP, Paris S. The fungal spore: reservoir of allergens. In: Cole GT and Hoch HC, eds. The fungal spore and disease initiation in plants and animals. New York: Plenum Press; 1991. p. 379–401.

  19. 19.

    Balasubramanian R, Nainar P, Rajasekar A. Airborne bacteria, fungi, and endotoxin levels in residential microenvironments: a case study. Aerobiologia. 2011;28(3):375–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Knutsen AP, Bush RK, Demain JG, Denning DW, Dixit A, Fairs A, et al. Fungi and allergic lower respiratory tract diseases. J Allergy  Clin Immunol. 2012;129(2):280–91.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hulin M, Moularat S, Kirchner S, Robine E, Mandin C, Annesi-Maesano I. Positive associations between respiratory outcomes and fungal index in rural inhabitants of a representative sample of French dwellings. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2013;216(2):155–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tsao Y-C, Hwang Y-H. Impact of a water-damaged indoor environment on kindergarten student absences due to upper respiratory infection. Build Environ. 2013;64:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Liu Z, Li A, Hu Z, Sun H. Study on the potential relationships between indoor culturable fungi, particle load and children respiratory health in Xi’an, China. Build Environ. 2014;80:105–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Horner SD. Effect of education on school-age children’s and parents’ asthma management. J Special Pediatr Nurs. 2004;9(3):95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Menezes EA, Trindade ECP, Costa MM, Freire CCF, Cavalcante MdS, Cunha FA. Airborne fungi isolated from Fortaleza city, State of Ceara, Brazil. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo. 2004;46(3):133-7.

  26. 26.

    Fang Z, Ouyang Z, Hu L, Wang X, Zheng H, Lin X. Culturable airborne fungi in outdoor environments in Beijing, China. Sci Total Environ. 2005;350(1–3):47–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Dvorackova I, Stora C, Ayraud N. Evidence for aflatoxin B 1 in two cases of lung cancer in man. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1981;100(2):221–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Georggiett O, Muino J, Montrull H, Brizuela N, Avalos S, Gomez R. Relationship between lung cancer and aflatoxin B1. Rev Fac Cien Med Cordob Argentina. 2000;57(1):95–107.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Olsen J, Dragsted L, Autrup H. Cancer risk and occupational exposure to aflatoxins in Denmark. Br J Cancer. 1988;58(3):392–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Marchese S, Polo A, Ariano A, Velotto S, Costantini S, Severino L. Aflatoxin B1 and M1: Biological properties and their involvement in cancer development. Toxins. 2018;10(6):214.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ahmed Adam MA, Tabana YM, Musa KB, Sandai DA. Effects of different mycotoxins on humans, cell genome and their involvement in cancer. Oncol Rep. 2017;37(3):1321–36.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Anderson K, Morris G, Kennedy H, Croall J, Michie J, Richardson MD, et al. Aspergillosis in immunocompromised paediatric patients: associations with building hygiene, design, and indoor air. Thorax. 1996;51(3):256–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cuijpers C, Swaen G, Wesseling G, Sturmans F, Wouters E. Adverse-effects of the indoor environment on respiratory health in primary-school children. Environ Res. 1995;68(1):11–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hu FB, Persky V, Flay BR, Richardson J. An epidemiological study of asthma prevalence and related factors among young adults. J Asthma. 1997;34(1):67–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Flannigan B, Mccabe EM, McGarry F. Allergenic and toxigenic micro-organisms in houses. J Appl Bacteriol. 1991;70:61S-73S.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Marr KA, Patterson T, Denning D. Aspergillosis: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and therapy. Infect Dis Clin. 2002;16(4):875–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Malling HJ. Diagnosis and Immunotherapy of Mould Allergy: IV. Relation between Asthma Symptoms, Spore Counts and Diagnostic Tests. Allergy. 1986;41(5):342–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Strachan D. Damp housing and childhood asthma: validation of reporting of symptoms. Br Med J. 1988;297(6658):1223–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Garrett MH, Rayment PR, Hooper MA, Abramson MJ, Hooper BM. Indoor airborne fungal spores, house dampness and associations with environmental factors and respiratory health in children. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998;28(4):459–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fang Z, Guo W, Zhang J, Lou X. Assemblages of Culturable Airborne Fungi in a Typical Urban, Tourism-driven Center of Southeast China. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2019;19(4):820–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Liu Z, Cheng K, Li H, Cao G, Wu D, Shi Y. Exploring the potential relationship between indoor air quality and the concentration of airborne culturable fungi: a combined experimental and neural network modeling study. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(4):3510–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Fang Z, Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Wang X. Concentration and Size Distribution of Culturable Airborne Microorganisms in Outdoor Environments in Beijing, China. Aerosol Sci Technol. 2008;42(5):325–34.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Fang Z, Tang Q, Gong C, Ouyang Z, Liu P, Sun L, et al. Profile and distribution characteristics of culturable airborne fungi in residential homes with children in Beijing, China. Indoor Built Environ. 2015;26(9):1232–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Guo Z, Wang Z, Qian L, Zhao Z, Zhang C, Fu Y, et al. Biological and chemical compositions of atmospheric particulate matter during hazardous haze days in Beijing. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(34):34540–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wu D, Zhang Y, Li A, Kong Q, Li Y, Geng S, et al. Indoor airborne fungal levels in selected comprehensive compartments of the urban utility tunnel in Nanjing, Southeast China. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2019;51:101723.

  46. 46.

    Li L, Lei C, Liu Z-G. Investigation of airborne fungi at different altitudes in Shenzhen University. Nat Sci. 2010;02(05):506–14.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Huang H-L, Lee M-K, Shih H-W. Assessment of Indoor Bioaerosols in Public Spaces by Real-Time Measured Airborne Particles. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2017;17(9):2276–88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Li Y, Wang W, Guo X, Wang T, Fu H, Zhao Y, et al. Assessment of Airborne Bacteria and Fungi in Various University Indoor Environments: A Case Study in Chang’an University, China. Environ Eng Sci. 2015;32(4):273–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Chen Y-P, Cui Y, Dong J-G. Variation of airborne bacteria and fungi at Emperor Qin’s Terra-Cotta Museum, Xi’an, China, during the “Oct. 1” gold week period of 2006. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2010;17(2):478–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Baruch Boxer EB, Inc. Corporate Site,. Tianjin China: Encyclopædia Britannica; [cited 2020 7 November]. Available from:

  51. 51.

    Kalyoncu F. Viable Airborne Fungi of Outdoor Environments of Yunusemre District, Manisa, Turkey. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019:261–4.

  52. 52.

    Di Giorgio C, Krempff A, Guiraud H, Binder P, Tiret C, Dumenil G. Atmospheric pollution by airborne microorganisms in the city of Marseilles. Atmospher Environ. 1996;30(1):155–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Pasanen A-L, Lappalainen S, Pasanen P. Volatile organic metabolites associated with some toxic fungi and their mycotoxins. Analyst. 1996;121(12):1949–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Awad AHA. Environmental Study in Subway Metro Stations in Cairo, Egypt. J Occup Health. 2002;44(2):112–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Downs SH, Mitakakis TZ, Marks GB, Car NG, Belousova EG, Leuppi JD, et al. Clinical importance of Alternaria exposure in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164(3):455–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kustrzeba-Wójcicka I, Siwak E, Terlecki G, Wolańczyk-Mędrala A, Mędrala W. Alternaria alternata and its allergens: a comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2014;47(3):354–65.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gabriel MF, Postigo I, Tomaz CT, Martínez J. Alternaria alternata allergens: markers of exposure, phylogeny and risk of fungi-induced respiratory allergy. Environ Int. 2016;89:71–80.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Larsen LS. A three-year-survey of microfungi in the air of Copenhagen 1977-79. Allergy. 1981;36(1):15–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sandoval-Denis M, Sutton DA, Martin-Vicente A, Cano-Lira JF, Wiederhold N, Guarro J, et al. Cladosporium Species Recovered from Clinical Samples in the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53(9):2990–3000.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Mercier E, Peters I, Billen F, Battaille G, Clercx C, Day M, et al. Potential role of Alternaria and Cladosporium species in canine lymphoplasmacytic rhinitis. J Small Anim Pract. 2013;54(4):179–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sellart-Altisent M, Torres-Rodríguez JM, Gómez dAS, Alvarado-Ramírez E. Nasal fungal microbiota in allergic and healthy subjects. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2007;24(2):125.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ma X, Gu Y, Liu X, Li D, Ling S, Hou J, et al. Phaeohyphomycotic dermatitis in a giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) caused by Cladosporium cladosporioides. Med Mycol Case Rep. 2013;2:119–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Aboutalebian S, Mahmoudi S, Okhovat A, Khodavaisy S, Mirhendi H. Otomycosis Due to the Rare Fungi Talaromyces purpurogenus, Naganishia albida and Filobasidium magnum. Mycopathologia. 2020;185(3):569–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Gharehbolagh SA, Nasimi M, Afshari SAK, Ghasemi Z, Rezaie S. First case of superficial infection due to Naganishia albida (formerly Cryptococcus albidus) in Iran: A review of the literature. Curr Med Mycol. 2017;3(2):33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Giri D, Adhikary P, Murthy V. The influence of meteorological conditions on PM10 concentrations in Kathmandu Valley. 2008.

  66. 66.

    Picco AM, Rodolfi M. Airborne fungi as biocontaminants at two Milan underground stations. Inte Biodeterioration Biodegradation. 2000;45:43–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ponce-Caballero C, Gamboa-Marrufo M, López-Pacheco M, Cerón-Palma I, Quintal-Franco C, Giácoman-Vallejos G, et al. Seasonal variation of airborne fungal propagules indoor and outdoor of domestic environments in Mérida, Mexico. Atmósfera. 2013;26(3):369–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hwang SH, Cho JH. Evaluation of airborne fungi and the effects of a platform screen door and station depth in 25 underground subway stations in Seoul, South Korea. Air Qual Atmospher Health. 2015;9(5):561–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Hwang SH, Jang S, Park WM, Park JB. Concentrations and identification of culturable airborne fungi in underground stations of the Seoul metro. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23(20):20680–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Kim KY, Kim HT, Kim D, Nakajima J, Higuchi T. Distribution characteristics of airborne bacteria and fungi in the feedstuff-manufacturing factories. J Hazard Mater. 2009;169(1–3):1054–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Fernández-Rodríguez S, Tormo-Molina R, Maya-Manzano JM, Silva-Palacios I, Gonzalo-Garijo Á. Outdoor airborne fungi captured by viable and non-viable methods. Fungal Ecol. 2014;7:16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Jones AM, Harrison RM. The effects of meteorological factors on atmospheric bioaerosol concentrations–a review. Sci Total Environ. 2004;326(1–3):151–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Pyrri I, Kapsanaki-Gotsi E. Functional relations of airborne fungi to meteorological and pollution factors in a Mediterranean urban environment. Fungal Ecol. 2017;30:48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    World Population Review US. World Population Review [cited 2020 7 November]. Available from:

  75. 75.

    Odebode A, Adekunle A, Stajich J, Adeonipekun P. Airborne fungi spores distribution in various locations in Lagos, Nigeria. Environ Monit Assess. 2020;192(2):87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Ljaljević-Grbić M, Stupar M, Vukojević J, Maričić I, Bungur N. Molds in museum environments: biodeterioration of art photographs and wooden sculptures. Arch Bio Sci. 2013;65(3):955–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Omelyansky VL. Manual in Microbiology. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences; 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Möller E, Bahnweg G, Sandermann H, Geiger H. A simple and efficient protocol for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from filamentous fungi, fruit bodies, and infected plant tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992;20(22):6115.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Gilman J. A Manual of Soil Fungi. Soil Sci. 1957;84(2):183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Lucas JA, Alexopoulos CJ, Mims CW, editors. Introductory mycology. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1979. p. 632.

  81. 81.

    De Hoog G, Guarro J, Gene J, Figueras M. Atlas of clinical fungi. Utrecht: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS); 2000. p. 1160.

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Barnett HL, Hunter BB. Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. 4th ed. St. Paul: APS press; 1998. p. 218.

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Dugan FM. The identification of fungi. Minnesota: APS Press; 2006. p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara R, et al. Package ‘vegan’. Community ecology package, version. 2013;2(9):1–295.

Download references


Not applicable.

Author information




Conception and design of the research LP; acquisition of data YN, MDA, XW, SHX, and LP; analysis and interpretation of data YN, MDA, SP, XW, SHX, and LP; drafting the article YN under the guidance and critical review of LP; revising the article for important intellectual content MDA, SP, XW, SHX, PWR and LP. All authors approved the manuscript version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenzo Pecoraro.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. LP is a member of the editorial board of this journal.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1.

Environmental factors recorded in each samplingsite at the time of sampling. Supplementary Table S2. Total number of fungal colonies isolated from each location from December 2019 to March 2020. Supplementary Table S3. Airborne fungal diversity molecularly detected in Tianjin outdoor environments, from DNA extracted from isolated strains. Supplementary Table S4. Isolated airborne fungal genera and number of strains. Supplementary Table S5. Isolated air borne fungal species and number of strains

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nageen, Y., Asemoloye, M.D., Põlme, S. et al. Analysis of culturable airborne fungi in outdoor environments in Tianjin, China. BMC Microbiol 21, 134 (2021).

Download citation


  • Airborne fungi
  • Biodiversity
  • Environmental factors
  • Outdoor environments