Skip to main content

In-vitro compatibility assay of indigenous Trichoderma and Pseudomonas species and their antagonistic activities against black root rot disease (Fusarium solani) of faba bean (Vicia faba L.)

Abstract

Background

Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) cultivation is highly challenged by faba bean black root rot disease (Fusarium solani) in high lands of Ethiopia. To ensure sustainable production of faba beans, searching for eco-friendly disease management options is necessary to curb the progress of the disease timely. The indigenous biocontrol agents that suit local environments may effectively strive with in-situ microorganisms and suppress local pathogen strains. This study aimed to screen antagonistic indigenous compatible Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains against Fusarium solani. In the pathogenicity test, soil-filled pots were arranged in complete random block design and sown with health faba bean seeds. The effect of some fungicides was evaluated against Fusarium by food poisoning methods to compare with the biocontrol agents. The antagonistic efficacy of biocontrol agents and their compatibility was investigated on Potato dextrose agar medium.

Results

Fusarium solani AAUF51 strain caused an intense root rotting in faba bean plant. The effect of Mancozeb 80% WP at 300 ppm was comparable with Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains against Fusarium. The mycelial growth of test the pathogen was significantly (P ≤ 0.05) reduced to 86.67 and 85.19% by Trichoderma harzianum AAUW1 and Trichoderma viridae AAUC22 strains in dual culture, respectively. The volatile metabolites of Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31 (77.78%) found the most efficient in reducing mycelial growth of Fusarium followed by Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUPF62 (71.11%) strains. The cell-free culture filtrates of Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUPF62 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31 were more efficient than the Trichoderma strain in reducing the growth of Fusarium isolates. There was no zone of inhibition recorded between Trichoderma harzianum AAUW1, Trichoderma viridae AAUC22, Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31, and Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUPF62 strains, hence they were mutually compatible.

Conclusions

The compatible Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains showed antagonistic potentiality that could be explored for faba bean protection against black root rot disease and might have a future dual application as biocontrol agents.

Peer Review reports

Background

Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) belongs to the family Fabaceae is a pulse crop grown in many regions in the world due to its high nutritional value [1] and effective biological nitrogen fixation [2]. Nutritionally, it is rich in protein, complex carbohydrates, dietary fiber, choline, lecithin, minerals, and secondary metabolites including phenolic compounds [3]. Also, faba bean seeds are low in fats, cholesterol-free, and low sodium [4]. Hence, it is globally recognized as one of the most important staple crops for human consumption and essential to attaining sustainable food security [2].

Faba bean takes the largest share of area (437,106.04 ha) and production (9,217,615.35 quintals) among pulses grown in Ethiopia [5]. Despite its wide ecological and economic benefits, the average actual yield of faba bean is about 1.2 t ha− 1 which is very low compared to the average potential yield (4.4 t ha− 1) in major production areas of the country [6]. The low yield of faba bean is attributed to both biotic [7] and abiotic [8] constraints.

Fungal diseases are among the most important biotic factors causing faba bean yield reduction [2]. Black root rot caused by Fusarium solani is the most destructive and faba bean yield-reducing among fungal diseases in the high lands of Ethiopia [9]. The disease impacting the production of faba beans and causes up to 100% yield loss on farmers’ fields under severe conditions [10]. It usually appears at pre-emergence and early seedling stages during the growing season [2]. It is noted by stunted plant growth and yellowing, necrotic basal leaves, brown, red, or black streaks on roots that coalesce as they mature. The disease causes rotting which makes black discoloration of the roots and ultimately results in the death of the plant [1].

Although black root rot disease has been known as a common disease of faba bean for a long time, management options for faba bean producers are limited. To maintain the level of faba bean yield both quantitatively and qualitatively, farmers often rely heavily on the use of chemical fungicides to control the disease [11]. Conversely, the application of chemical fungicides in faba bean growing field results in the development of resistance by the plant pathogens, hazardous to human health, pollute the environment and harm biodiversity of the ecosystem [12].

Thus, the use of supplementary biological control methods is mandatory to suppress the effect of black root rot diseases and to ensure sustainable eco-friendly agricultural practice. A biological control method becomes a promising tool to use in agricultural production as it reduces the release of polluting chemical fungicides to the ecosystem [13].

At present, quite several biocontrol agents are found to be able to manage plant diseases effectively as well as all ecologically soundproof [14]. Trichoderma and Pseudomonas species have been reported as the most potential biocontrol agents against numerous phytopathogens [15]. The plant growth-promoting Pseudomonas aeruginosa have increased the yield by suppressing the disease effect [16]. However, the use of a single biocontrol agent often resulted in inconsistent performances in agriculture [17].

One of the reasons for such a failure could be that a single bioagent might not grow equally well in a variety of environmental conditions [18]. Nowadays, more emphasis was laid on the use of combined biocontrol agents with multiple mechanisms that could increase the success of biological control [19]. To designate microbial for combined use, the approach was focused on the compatibility among selected bioagents [20]. Co-inoculation of compatible biocontrol agents is considered to be an innovative approach in plant health management, and for the improvement of crop yield and quality. Therefore, the current study was aimed to identify compatible indigenous Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains which showed antagonistic activities against black root rot disease (Fusarium solani) of Faba bean (Vicia faba L.).

Materials and methods

Fungal pathogen

Sampling techniques and sample collection

A total of 100 naturally infected faba bean roots with black root rot symptoms were collected randomly from North Shoa farmers’ fields of Angolelana Tera (50 samples), and Sululta (50 samples) districts during the 2018 main cropping season. All samples were packed in polyethylene bags and transported to the Mycology Laboratory, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University. The samples were stored at 4 °C until use.

Samples preparation for isolation, purification, and identification of Fusarium solani

According to [21], the infected parts of the root samples were washed in running tap water and excised with a sterile scalpel to small pieces (1 cm). The pieces were surface-sterilized by dipping those in 2% sodium hypochlorite for 5 min, followed by washing three times with sterile distilled water for 2 min. The fragments were inoculated on 90 mm Petri plates of sterilized Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium amended with chloramphenicol. A 0.1 ml of the last washes was spread plated on PDA as a control to check the quality of sterilization. The inoculated medium was incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for 7 days. Triplicates were maintained for each treatment. The colonies were purified using single hyphal tip techniques followed by [22] and identified based upon their cultural and morphological characteristics. The spore shape of the isolate was observed under high power objectives (40X) lens by staining the pure colony with lactophenol cotton blue.

Inoculum preparation of test pathogen

Four mm discs of five selected faba bean black root rot diseases causal agent suspected isolates were removed by using sterilized cork borers. Three discs of each isolate were separately inoculated in a 250 ml flask containing 100 ml Potato dextrose broth and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for seven days. The levels of spore suspensions were adjusted to 1 × 106 spores ml− 1 by using a hemocytometer [23].

Pathogenicity tests

In this experiment, the seed of susceptible faba bean cultivar (FB-26869) were collected from the Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute (EBI) and used to carry out the pathogenicity tests of Fusarium strains. The pathogenicity tests were carried out under greenhouse conditions located at the College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University. An autoclave sterilized mixture of 1:1 clay soil and sand were distributed in plastic pots (2 kg pot− 1). The pots were kept under 12 h light and 12 h dark photoperiod and watered every day to maintain the moisture of the soil. The mean minimum and maximum daily temperature in the greenhouse during the study period were 15 °C and 22 °C, respectively. Likewise, the mean relative humidity was between 65 and 85%.

Surface sterilized health faba bean seeds were sown in each pot (4 seeds pot− 1). Ten ml of spore suspension (1 × 106 spores ml− 1) was poured onto the stem base of each faba bean plant separately a week after sowing followed by [23]. Pots without the test pathogen used as control. Triplicates were maintained for each treatment. Faba bean plants were examined periodically and plants with black root rot symptoms were recorded to determine the virulence of each pathogen under test. Pathogenic Fusarium was re-isolated from infected plants and re-inoculated as mentioned above. Data were recorded as the percentage of disease incidence and severity index in each treatment.

$$ \mathrm{Percent}\ \mathrm{disease}\ \mathrm{incidence}=\frac{\mathrm{No}.\mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{disease}\mathrm{d}\ \mathrm{plants}\ }{\mathrm{Total}\ \mathrm{no}.\mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{plants}\ \mathrm{inspected}}\times 100 $$

Disease severity ratings were conducted using a 0–5 rating scale for overall plant and root symptoms as follows: The overall plant rating was as follows: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = minor plant stunting, 2 = wilting or drooping of a few leaves, 3 = plant stunting obvious, wilting leaves with chlorosis and some necrosis, 4 = extreme plant stunting and shoot showing external brown discoloration, and 5 = death of the plant. After 60 days, faba bean plants from each treatment were uprooted, washed in running water, and air-dried. The mean disease rating of the root is computed as the disease severity index. Roots were rated as follows: 0 = no symptoms, 1 = minor root tip discoloration, 2 = root discoloration extending beyond root tips, 3 = prominent dark root discoloration, smaller roots more severely affected. 4 = smaller, secondary roots are black or missing, 5 = only tertiary roots remaining with brown/black coloration. The disease severity index (DSI) was computed for each plant by adding the individual ratings comprising overall plant and root ratings [24].

$$ \%\mathrm{DSI}=\left\{\frac{\ \left[\sum \Big(\mathrm{Number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{plants}\ \mathrm{showing}\ \mathrm{infected}\ \mathrm{roots}\ \mathrm{X}\ \mathrm{disease}\ \mathrm{severity}\right)\Big]}{\left(\mathrm{Number}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{total}\ \mathrm{plants}\ \mathrm{X}\ \mathrm{the}\ \mathrm{hieghest}\ \mathrm{disease}\ \mathrm{severity}\right)}\right\}X\ 100 $$

Sensitivity of Fusarium isolate to fungicides

The sensitivity of Fusarium isolates to some fungicides was evaluated under in vitro conditions. Two fungicides with different active ingredients; Mancozeb 80% WP and Cupper Oxy-Chloride 50% WP were collected from the Addis Ababa market and used as comparing treatment. For each fungicide, a stock solution having a concentration of 1000 ppm was prepared followed by commercial formulation [25]. The calculated amount of the stock solution of a fungicide was supplemented with sterilized PDA medium and chloramphenicol to get the final concentrations of 50,100, 200, 300, and 400 ppm in food poisoning techniques. Twenty ml of the supplemented medium of a particular concentration was poured in sterilized Petri plates and allowed to solidify. In the control set, the required amount of sterile water instead of fungicide was added to the PDA medium. Then it was inoculated in the center of the plate with a 5 mm of mycelial agar disc of Fusarium isolate and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C for seven days. Three replications were maintained in both cases.

Collection of Pseudomonas and Trichoderma strains

Five Pseudomonas strains (P. aeruginosa AAUAm28, P. fluorescens AAUF3, P. fluorescens AAUW24, P. aeruginosa AAUS31, P. fluorescens AAUPF62) and five Trichoderma strains (T. harzianum AAUW1, T. viridae AAUC22, T. hamatum AAUS69, T. hamatum AAUS12, T. reesei AAUAm31) were obtained from the stock cultures in the Mycology Laboratory, Department of Microbial Cellular and Molecular Biology, College of Natural and Computational Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia. These strains were originally isolated from health faba bean rhizosphere soil from different localities of Angolelana Tera, Sululta, and Medakegn districts. The Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) medium supplemented with chloramphenicol was used for reactivation, multiplication, and preservation of Trichoderma strains while Nutrient agar medium was used for Pseudomonas strains.

In-vitro antagonistic assay of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains

Dual culture antagonistic assay

In dual culture, an agar disc (4 mm) of seven days old Trichoderma was placed 10 mm away from the periphery on PDA plates and the same sized agar disc of seven days old test pathogen was placed at the opposite side of Trichoderma isolate. The bacterial isolate was streaked at the opposite side of the test pathogen; approximately 40 mm away from the center followed by [26]. A medium inoculated only with Fusarium solani was used as a control and triplicates were maintained. The plates were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C until full growth of the control. After the period of incubation, the percentage of inhibition of the test pathogen was calculated as described by [27].

$$ \% inhibition=\frac{\left(R1-R2\right)\times 100}{R1} $$

where; R1: mycelial growth in control, R2: mycelial growth in dual culture.

The effect of antifungal volatile organic metabolites

The effect of volatile organic metabolites of both Trichoderma and Pseudomonas isolates on the mycelial growth of the test pathogen was tested by paired plate techniques followed by [28]. A Petri plate containing PDA was separately inoculated with a 4 mm agar plug of activated test pathogen and Trichoderma isolates at the center of the plate. Whereas a Petri plate containing Nutrient Agar medium was streak inoculated with a loopful of 48 h old bacterial isolate followed by [26]. Half plates with the test pathogen inverted over a plate containing Trichoderma, and bacterial isolates. Both half plates were sealed together by scotch tape and the paired plates were incubated at 26 ± 2 °C for 14 days. A Control set of paired plates was designed with only the test fungus on the PDA half-plate inverted over the uninoculated medium. The experiment was conducted in triplicates. After the incubation period, the paired plates were observed for inhibition of the mycelial growth of the test pathogen, and percent inhibition of the test pathogen was calculated as mentioned above.

The antagonistic assay of culture filtrates of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas isolates

A 250 ml flask containing 100 ml of potato dextrose broth (PDB) was separately inoculated with five days old culture of three an equal disc (4 mm) of each Trichoderma isolate and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C on a rotary shaker set at 100 rpm for 14 days. The culture was filtered using filter paper (Whatman No.1) for removing mycelial mats. Then, the filtrate was sterilized by passing through a 0.2 μm pore biological membrane filter [20]. Also, the Pseudomonas was inoculated into a 250 ml conical flask containing 100 ml of nutrient broth. The flasks were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 96 h on an orbital shaker with 120 rpm. The culture was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 30 min to get the cell-free filtrate [22].

Each sterilized filtrate was mixed to molten PDA medium amended with chloramphenicol at 40 ± 3 °C to obtain a final concentration of 15, 25, and 40% (v/v) into a sterilized 250 ml flask. Finally, about 20 ml of the medium amended with different concentrations of the filtrate were poured in 90 mm Petri plates. The secondary metabolites in the filtrate were tested for their efficacy against the test pathogens. The test pathogen was centrally inoculated with an individual equal disc (4 mm) of seven days old culture. PDA plates inoculated with pathogens without culture filtrates served as control. Three replicates were maintained for each treatment and incubated at 25 ± 2 °C. The percentage inhibition of mycelial growth was calculated as mentioned above.

Test for compatibility of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas isolates

A dual culture technique was performed for evaluating the compatibility of the isolates [29]. Trichoderma grown on PDA plates at 25 °C for 5 days, were used for the study. Pseudomonas isolates were raised in Nutrient broth. Twenty-four hrs old bacterial cultures were streaked on one side at 10 mm away from the periphery of the Nutrient Agar plates. The bacterial isolates were allowed to grow for 24 h. at 26 ± 2 °C. A four mm diameter plug from a five days old culture of Trichoderma isolate was placed in the opposite direction of the plate (approximately 40 mm apart). A control plate was kept without bacterial inoculation. Triplicates were maintained for each treatment. After five days of incubation at 26 ± 2 °C, the growth of Trichoderma isolates in the dual inoculation plates was measured for assessing compatibility. The zone of inhibition was measured and percent inhibition over control was calculated using the above-mentioned formula.

Data analysis

Data were subjected to SPSS statistical software version 20 and one-way ANOVA. The effect of antagonists on the mycelial growth of the test pathogen was compared using the least significant difference (LSD) at a 5% probability level (P ≤ 0.05).

Results

A total of 25 Fusarium isolates were obtained from infected faba bean roots. However, five fungal isolates which exhibited the basic characteristics feature of Fusarium solani were selected and designated as showed in Table 1.

Table 1 Localities and designation of Fusarium solani strains

Cultural and morphological characters of Fusarium strains

Five Fusarium isolates, Fusarium solani AAUF 51, AAUF52, AAUW22, AAUW41, and AUUC31 growing on a PDA had developed flat colony growth with pale coloration on the reverse side. All isolates had abundant white cottony growth on the front side. The colony margin of Fusarium solani AAUF51, AAUF52, and AAUW41 appeared smooth, whereas appeared irregular in Fusarium solani AAUW 22 and Fusarium solani AAUC31 isolates. In older cultures, some black bodies are scattered on the culture plate. Macroconidia were straight to slightly curve with thin walls. The apical cells were slightly curved and tapered. Chlamydospores of isolates were smooth, globose, usually single, light yellow-brown color with thick walls, immersed in the culture media rather than superficial. Significantly (P ≤ 0.05) higher colony diameter (90 mm) was recorded in isolates coded as Fusarium solani AAUF 52, AAUF 51, and AAUW 41 than AAUC 31 and AAUW 22 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Colony morphology of Fusarium solani isolates

Pathogenicity of Fusarium isolates

In the pathogenicity test, water-inoculated healthy faba bean plants showed no stunting. The root tissue was white with no internal or external discoloration and a 5% disease incidence. In contrast, Fusarium-infected faba bean plants initially showed mild stunting 3–4 weeks after inoculation, followed by more severe stunting later with 100% disease incidence. Roots were dark brown to black, severely decayed, weak, and easily separated from the surrounding soil (Fig. 2). Plants that were necrotic had dark brown external discoloration at the base of the stem.

Fig. 2
figure2

Pathogenicity test under greenhouse conditions

The maximum mean percent disease severity index (DSI) was recorded by Fusarium solani AAUF51 strain (89.5%) followed by AAUF52 (89%), AAUW41 (88.5%), AAUW22 (86.4%), and AAUC21 (85%) (Fig. 2). The ANOVA results indicated that there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between AAUF51, AAUF52, and AAUW41 isolates in virulence as determined by DSI on faba bean plants. Hence, due to the vastness of the data, we provide here only the antagonistic effect of bioagents against Fusarium solani AAUF51. The fungus was re-isolated from the diseased stem and root tissue of inoculated plants but not from healthy check plants. Symptoms on inoculated plants were similar to those observed in the field and the recovered isolates had the same cultural and morphological characteristics as the original isolates, thus fulfilling Koch’s postulates.

Sensitivity of Fusarium isolate to fungicides

Better inhibition of the radial growth of the test pathogen was observed with Mancozeb 80% WP at 50, 100, 200, 300, and 400 ppm concentration than Cupper Oxy-Chloride 50% WP after seventh days of incubation. Mancozeb 80% WP was responsible for more than 71% inhibition of Fusarium isolates at 300 whereas Cupper Oxy-Chloride 50% WP was responsible at 400 ppm concentrations. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) among 300 Mancozeb 80% WP and 400 ppm Cupper Oxy-Chloride 50% WP concentration in percent inhibition of the radial growth of the test pathogen. Hence, Fusarium isolate was more sensitive to Mancozeb 80% WP than Cupper Oxy-Chloride 50% WP even at low concentrations (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

The effect of fungicides on mycelial growth of Fusarium solani AAU F51 strain

A vertical line indicates a standard error; the same letter represents an absence of significant difference at P > 0.05.

Antagonistic assay of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas isolates against the test pathogen

Dual culture antagonistic test

The in-vitro dual culture test is one of the key tests used for the preliminary screening of biological control agents. Most of the Trichoderma and Pseudomonas isolates showed significant potent antifungal activity by restricting mycelial expansion. Trichoderma viridae AAUC22 (3.81 mm), Trichoderma harzianum AAUW1 (3.33 mm), Trichoderma hamatum AAUS12 (3.00 mm), Trichoderma hamatum AAUS69 (2.67 mm), and Trichoderma reesei AAUAm31 (2 mm) displayed zone of inhibition against Fusarium solani AAUF51 isolate. Trichoderma isolates showed a higher inhibition effect than Pseudomonas isolates. Trichoderma harzianum AAUW1 was the best bioagent followed by Trichoderma viridae AAUC22 inhibiting 86.67 and 85.19% mycelial growth of the test pathogen in dual culture, respectively. Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUPF62 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31 isolates caused an inhibition area of 75.56 and 71.11%, respectively (Fig. 4 & Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure4

Dual culture of Pseudomonas and Trichoderma strains against Fusarium solani AAU F51

Fig. 5
figure5

The effect of bioagents on mycelial growth of Fusarium solani AAUF 51 both in dual culture and volatile metabolites

Volatile antifungal metabolites

It is observed from this experiment that all the tested bioagents produced volatile antifungal metabolites having a significant effect in reducing the mycelial growth of Fusarium solani. Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31 (77.78%) was found the most efficient in reducing the mycelial growth of Fusarium solani AAUF51. Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUPF62 exhibited significantly higher antagonistic volatile metabolites than others and inhibited the mycelial growth of test pathogen by 71.11% followed by Trichoderma viridae AAUC22 (67.78%) over the control. The volatile antifungal metabolites of Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUW24 and Trichoderma harzianum AAUW1 isolates had reduced the mycelial growth of Fusarium isolate to 66.67 and 64.44%, respectively. The least percent inhibition was recorded by Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUAm28 (53.33%) and Trichoderma reesei AAUAm31 (53.33%) isolates (Fig. 5).

A vertical line indicates standard errors; the same letter represents an absence of significant difference at P > 0.05.

The effect of culture filtrates (non-volatile compound)

All tested bacteria and Trichoderma isolates significantly inhibited Fusarium isolates by the production of non-volatile antifungal secondary metabolites at 15, 25, and 40% concentrations of culture filtrates (Table 2). Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUPF62 was the most inhibiting for the test pathogen mycelial growth at the three culture filtrates 42.22, 60.00, and 82.22%, respectively. It is observed that culture filtrate from Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUPF62 (42.22%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31 (37.78%) isolates showed higher mycelial growth inhibition at a concentration of 15% than others. Trichoderma viridae AAUC22 has reduced the mycelia of the test pathogen by 33.33%, whereas Trichoderma harzianum AAUW1 reduced by 28.89%.

Table 2 The effect of culture filtrate of Pseudomonas and Trichoderma strains on mycelial growth of the test pathogen

The maximum percent inhibition was observed in the culture filtrate of Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUPF62 (82.22%) at 40% concentration followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31 (77.78%) and Trichoderma harzianum AAUW1 (77.78%). The least mycelial growth inhibition of the test pathogen was recorded by Trichoderma reesei AAUAm31 (4.44%) at a 15% concentration of culture filtrate. Increasing the concentrations of culture filtrate caused an increase in growth inhibition (Table 2).

In vitro compatibility test of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains

As data are shown in Table 3, fourteen out of 25 combinations between Pseudomonas and Trichoderma strains were incompatible. Antagonists grew normally in the control. Trichoderma viridae AUUC22 exhibited no antagonism against Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUAm28, Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUW24, Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31, and Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUPF62. No zone of inhibition was found between Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUW24 and Trichoderma harzianum AAUW1, Trichoderma viridae AAUC22, Trichoderma hamatum AAUS69, and Trichoderma hamatum AAUS12 strains. Besides, no antagonism was recorded by Trichoderma harzianum AAUW1 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31, and Pseudomonas fluorescence AAUPF62. Moreover, Trichoderma viridae AAUC22 hadn’t exhibited antagonism against Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31, and Pseudomonas fluorescence AAUPF 62. These signify that they are compatible (Table 3).

Table 3 Compatibility assay among Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains

Discussion

From this study, it is observed that the faba bean black root rot disease caused by Fusarium solani was isolated from infected faba bean roots. The Fusarium isolates were identified by their cultural, morphological characteristics, and pot experiment pathogenicity test. White to pale cream colonies was developed after seven days of incubation. Unbranched monophialides with 0–3 septa microconidia and 5–7 septa macroconidia, and chlamydospores were consistent in Fusarium solani. The chlamydospores were globose to oval in shape with a smooth or rough wall [30].

Previous research [30, 31] was reported that Fusarium solani caused faba bean black root rot disease. In our study, the pathogenicity test confirmed that Fusarium solani AAUF51 significantly caused the disease symptoms which was characterized by dark-brown to black discoloration on roots and basal stems under greenhouse conditions. Lower leaves of severely diseased plants turned yellow and blight later. This implies that Fusarium solani AAUF51 is the major causal pathogens of faba bean black root and basal stem rot during the vegetative stage in high lands of faba bean growing areas of Ethiopia.

Chemical fungicides have been used for the management of black root rot disease of faba bean. Some researchers, [32, 33] have reported that the efficacy of Mancozeb 80% WP against root rot of plant pathogens. However, chemical fungicides impose hazards to human health and environments [34]. With the rising awareness of the adverse effects of chemical fungicides, people are looking and prefer organically grown crops. Hence, the use of biocontrol agents, play an important role in disease suppression in cultivated plants [19, 35] and could full fill the demand for organic products and sustainable eco-friendly crop management options.

Besides some fungicides, the present study evaluated the in-vitro efficacy of indigenous Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains against faba bean black root rot disease-causing Fusarium solani. We found the antagonistic efficacy of Mancozeb 80% WP against the test pathogen at 300 and 400 ppm was comparable with the effect of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains. This infers that Trichoderma and pseudomonas stains are the potential bioagents that can be used to control black root rot disease as a supplementary to chemical fungicide. The application of potential bioagent lonely or in combination with compatible chemical fungicides could minimize the number of fungicides applied to the soil and increase the protection of plants [36].

The in-vitro antagonistic assay of both Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains showed that Trichoderma AAUW1 exhibited higher mycelial growth percent inhibition (86.67%) of Fusarium solani AAUF51 as compared to other antagonistic isolates in dual culture techniques. This could be associated with its mycoparasitism capability. A previous study by [37] demonstrated that Trichoderma species usually use multiple biocontrol mechanisms to suppress plant pathogenic fungi. Similarly, [18, 37, 38] have reported the efficacy of rhizosphere Trichoderma species against plant pathogens. The Pseudomonas AAUPF62 (75.56%) strain showed better antagonism in dual culture against the test pathogen than the remaining bacterial isolates. This study has observed that the antagonistic potential of rhizosphere bacterial isolates that corresponded with the research findings of [26, 39, 40] who have reported that antagonistic activity of Pseudomonas species against various plant pathogens. Similarly, [40] has shown that Pseudomonas aeruginosa inhibited Fusarium isolate by 77.2%. The antagonistic activity of Pseudomonas strains against Fusarium solani could be attributed to their capacity to produce various antifungal metabolites [30].

The genus Pseudomonas is well known of producing large arrays of antifungal metabolites, such as volatile organic compounds [13, 26]. We found the volatile compounds produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31 (77.78%) and Pseudomonas fluorescens AUUPF62 (71.11%) was more effective in inhibition of the mycelial growth of Fusarium solani AAUF51 than other isolates. This could be associated with the antimicrobial properties of volatile metabolites of the bioagents. Besides this, the antagonistic efficacy of the culture filtrates of Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains against the test pathogen increased with the concentration of the filtrates. In general, the antagonistic potential of the bioagents could be attributed to the HCN, siderophores, and hydrolytic enzyme production capability of the stains [37, 38]. HCN has been postulated to play an important role in the biological control of pathogens [26, 41]. On the other hand, the hydrolytic enzymes are involved in the cell wall degradation of the fungal pathogens [42].

This study revealed that 11 interactions among Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains were compatible with each other as no zone of inhibition was observed between the strains. Our findings were in agreement with [17,18,19, 43], who reported that, the compatibility of Pseudomonas and Trichoderma species under in-vitro assays. In our study, the promising potential antagonistic Pseudomonas and Trichoderma strains displayed compatibility under in-vitro conditions. Pseudomonas aeruginosa AAUS31 and Pseudomonas fluorescens AAUPF62 showed a positive interaction with Trichoderma harzianum AAUW1 and Trichoderma viridae AAUC22. This could be attributed to the existence of synergism between the metabolites produced by the Pseudomonas and Trichoderma strains. The compatible bioagents might protect the pathogens, at different times or under different conditions and might probably mimic the natural situation in the rhizosphere. Generally, it is expected to use that the combined application of compatible antagonists would increase the management of plant pathogens.

Conclusion and recommendations

This study found Fusarium solani as one of the major faba bean distractive fungal pathogen in high lands of faba bean growing areas of Ethiopia. The promising potential antagonistic indigenous Pseudomonas (AAUS31 and AAUPF62) and Trichoderma (AAUW1 and AAUC22) strains were found compatible with each other under in-vitro conditions. The disease suppression by the combination of compatible bioagents could be more effective than the individual ones possibly by the existence of synergism among the metabolites of the strains. The combined application of compatible Trichoderma and Pseudomonas strains is recommended for the management of faba bean black root rot disease.

Availability of data and materials

The data set used/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Etemadi F, Hashemi M, Barker A, Zandvakili O, Liu X. Agronomy, nutritional value, and medicinal application of Faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Hort Plant J. 2019;5(4):170–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2019.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ruisi P, Amato G, Badagliacca G, Salvatore F, Miceli G. Agro ecological benefits of faba bean for rainfed Mediterranean cropping systems. Italian J Agrol. 2017;12:233–45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Etemadi F, Hashemi M, Randhir R, Zandvakili O, Ebadi A. Accumulation of L-Dopa in various organs of faba bean and influence of drought, nitrogen stress, and processing methods on L-Dopa yield. Crop J. 2018;6(4):426–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2017.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Adamu GT, Ezeokoli OT, Dawodu AO, Adebayo-Oyetoro AO, Ofodile LN. Macronutrients and micronutrients profile of some underutilized beans in southwestern Nigeria. Int J Biochem Res Rev. 2015;7(2):80–9. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJBCRR/2015/17219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Central Statistical Agency (CSA) of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Agricultural Sample Survey. Report on Area and Production of major crops. 2018; Volume I, Statistical Bulletin 586.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wondafrash M, Kindie T, Mezegebu G, Seid A, Amsalu N, et al. Quantifying yield potential and yield gaps of Faba bean in Ethiopia. Ethiopian J Agri Sci. 2019;29(3):105–20.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Getnet YA, Yehizbalem AT. Addaptation of faba bean varaties for yield, for yield components and against faba bean gall (Olpidium viciae Kusano) disease in south Gonder, Ethiopia. Crop J. 2017;5:560–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Endalkachew F, Kibebew K, Asmare M, Bobe B. Yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) as affected by lime, mineral P, farmyard manure, compost and rhizobium in acid soil of Lay Gayint District, northwestern highlands of Ethiopia. Agri Food Sec. 2018;7:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gedyon T, Diriba M. The effect of rhizobia isolates against black root rot disease of Faba bean (Vicia faba L) caused by Fusarium solani. Open Agri J. 2018;12:131–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Belay H, Anteneh B. Biocontrol of faba bean black root rot caused by Fusarium solani using seed dressing and soil application of Trichoderma harzianum. J Biol cont. 2016;30(3):169–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Teklay AT, Gurja BW, Gemechu KW, Taye TM. Fungicidal management of the newly emerging faba bean disease “gall” (Olpidium viciae Kusano) in Tigray, Ethiopia. Plant Prot. 2018;107:19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dahal N, Shrestha RK. Evaluation of efficacy of fungicides against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis in vitro at Lamjung, Nepal. J Inst Agri Ani Sci. 2018;35(1):105–12. https://doi.org/10.3126/jiaas.v35i1.22520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Madbouly KA. Efficacy of pseudomonads as biocontrol agents of phytopathogens. Novel Res Micro J. 2018;2(3):48–52. https://doi.org/10.21608/NRMJ.2018.8152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kebede A, Temam H, Amare A, Mashilla D, Samuel S. In vitro screening and characterizing the Most promising antagonistic microorganism as biocontrol agent(s) against Colletotrichum kahawae. Eur Exp Bio. 2018;8(1):1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jorge M, Marius P, Juan A, Danut C, Mercedes F. Susceptibility of several northeastern conifers to Fusarium circinatum and strategies for biocontrol. Forest. 2017;8:318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Narjes HD, Magdy SM, Nedaa YA, Vineeth MC. Influence of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on fruit yield, pomological characteristics and chemical contents in cucumber mosaic virus-infected tomato plants. Kuwait J Sci. 2014;41(2):205–20.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Harshita A, Sinha JB, Khan S, Trivedi A, Rao G. Compatibility of fungal and bacterial bio-agents and their antagonistic effect against Fusarium oxysporum f. Sp. Lycopersici. Int J Curr Micro Appl Sci. 2018;7(7):2305–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Rajeswari P. Combination of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens for the enhanced control of Fusarium wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum infecting Arachis hypogaea L. J Appl Nat Sci. 2019;11(1):138–43. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v11i1.1985.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Khadeejath TH, Gupta A, Gopal M, Hegde V, Thomas GV. Evaluation of Combinatorial Capacity of Coconut and Cocoa Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) with biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum. Curr Inv Agri Curr Res. 2018;3(4):404-9.

  20. 20.

    Jangir M, Sharma S, Sharma S. Target and non-target effects of dual inoculation of biocontrol agents against Fusarium wilt in Solanum lycopersicum. Biol Control. 2019;138:104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.104069.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Adnan S, Jelena B, Maria RF. Endophytic Fusarium equiseti stimulates plant growth and reduces root rot disease of pea (Pisum sativum L.) caused by Fusarium avenaceum and Peyronellaea pinodella. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2017;148:271–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ahmed F, El-Fiki A. Effect of biological control of root rot diseases strawberry using Trichoderma spp. Middle East J Appl Sci. 2017;7:482–92.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Cerkauskas FR. Etiology and management of Fusarium crown and root rot (Fusarium oxysporum) on greenhouse pepper in Ontario, Canada. Canadian J Plant Pathol. 2017;39(2):121–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060661.2017.1321044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Alamri M, Hashem M, Mostafa S, Nafady A, Abo-Elyousr M. Biological control of root rot in lettuce caused by Exserohilum rostratum and Fusarium oxysporum via induction of the defense mechanism. Biol Control. 2019;128:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.09.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gautam C, Prabhu V, Nargund VB. In vitro evaluation of fungicides, botanicals and bioagents against Peziotrichum corticolum causing black banded disease of mango. Int J Curr Micro Appl Sci. 2017;6(3):652–61. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.603.076.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Islam A, Nain Z, Alam K, Banu A, Islam R. In vitro study of biocontrol potential of rhizospheric Pseudomonas aeruginosa against Fusarium oxysporum f sp cucumerinum. Egyptian J Biol Pest Cont. 2018;28:90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Koka A, Wani AH, Bhat MY, Parveen S. In vitro efficacy of Trichoderma isolates against some fungi causing fungal rot disease of tomato. Int J Adv Res. 2017;5(3):2050–3. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/3725.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mirmajless M, Marika N, Najdabbasi N, Larena I, Loit E. Screening of native Trichoderma harzianum isolates for their ability to control Verticillium wilt of strawberry. Zemdirbyste-Agri. 2016;103(4):397–404. https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2016.103.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Rajeela T, Gupta A, Gopal M, Hegde V, Thomas G. Evaluation of combinatorial capacity of coconut and cocoa plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) with biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum. Curr Inves Agri Curr Res. 2018;3(4):404–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Haddoudi I, Sendi Y, Batnini M, Ben-Romdhane S, Mrabet M. The bean rhizosphere Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain RZ9 strongly reduces Fusarium culmorum growth and infectiveness of plant roots. Spanish J Agri Res. 2017;15(2):e1003. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017152-10595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Shewafera M, Alemayehu D, Tesfaye A. Characterizations of antagonistic bacteria species against black root rot disease of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Middle East J Appl Sci. 2020;10(1):110–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mahantesh SB, Karegowda S, Kavitha V, Kavita TH, Punith K. In vitro evaluation of fungicides, bio agents and natural plant extracts against early blight caused by A. solani. Int J Chem st. 2017;5(5):1346–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Pandey P, Kushwaha K, Upadhyay V. Evaluation of potential fungicides and bio agents for the management of pea downy mildew and yield under field condition. Int J Curr Micro Appl Sci. 2017;6(12):1381–8. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.154.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Balgude Y, Kshirsagar CR, Gaikwad AP. Evaluation on the efficacy of modern fungicides against blast and sheath rot of Rice. Int J Curr Micro Appl Sci. 2019;8(3):83–8. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.803.013.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Mota MS, Gomes CB, Júnior IS, Moura BA. Bacterial selection for biological control of plant disease: criterion determination and validation. Brazilian J Micro. 2017;48(1):62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.09.003.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Nandini L, Ruth CH, Gopal K. Compatibility of biocontrol agents with fungicides used in turmeric cultivation under In-vitro conditions. Res J Chem Env Sci. 2018;6(4):19–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    You J, Zhang J, Wu M, Yang L, Chen W, Li G. Multiple criteria-based screening of Trichoderma isolates for biological control of Botrytis cinerea on tomato. Biol Control. 2016;101:31–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Nagwa EA, Hanaa AK, Manal AH, Amal ME, Mohamed AE, et al. Isolation and characterization of the bioactive metabolites from the soil derived fungus Trichoderma viride. Myco. 2018;9(1):70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Adhikari M, Yadav R, Kim S, Um H, Kim S, Lee C, et al. Biological control of bacterial fruit blotch of watermelon pathogen (Acidovorax citrulli) with Rhizosphere associated Bacteria. Plant Pathol J. 2017;33(2):170–83. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA.09.2016.0187.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chandurkar P. Antifungal activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against various plant pathogenic fungi. Int J Rec Trends Sci Tech. 2018;ACAEE(Special Issue):334–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nandi M, Selin C, Brawerman G, Fernando D, Kievit T. Hydrogen cyanide, which contributes to Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain PA23 biocontrol, is upregulated in the precence of glycine. Biol Control. 2017;108:47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.02.008.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Sheeba J, Dhamotharan R, Baskar K. Isolation, screening and characterization of plant growth promoting bacteria and their antifungal effect on Rhizoctonia Solani. Adv Plants Agri Res. 2017;7(5):369–75.

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Rajeswari P, Kapoor R. Combinatorial efficacy of Trichoderma spp. and Pseudomonas fluorescens to enhance suppression of cell wall degrading enzymes produced by Fusarium wilt of Arachis hypogaea. L. Int J Agri Res Inno Tech. 2017;7(2):36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express our sincere gratitude to Addis Ababa University Thematic Research Directorate for funding this research and the Department of Microbial, Cellular and Molecular Biology (DMCMB) for the provision of necessary laboratory facilities to accomplish this project. We are profoundly grateful to the Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute (EBI) for faba bean seed provision.

Funding

The authors acknowledge receipt of funding from Addis Ababa University.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AD, TA and YW: planning of experiments, AD: manuscript preparation and data interpretation, TA and YW: correction of the manuscript with scientific advice. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alemayehu Dugassa.

Ethics declarations

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dugassa, A., Alemu, T. & Woldehawariat, Y. In-vitro compatibility assay of indigenous Trichoderma and Pseudomonas species and their antagonistic activities against black root rot disease (Fusarium solani) of faba bean (Vicia faba L.). BMC Microbiol 21, 115 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-021-02181-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Compatibility
  • Fungicides
  • Pathogenicity
  • Pseudomonas
  • Black root rot
  • Trichoderma
  • Vicia faba L