Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genome-resolved metagenomics analysis provides insights into the ecological role of Thaumarchaeota in the Amazon River and its plume

BMC Microbiology volume 20, Article number: 13 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Thaumarchaeota are abundant in the Amazon River, where they are the only ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Despite the importance of Thaumarchaeota, little is known about their physiology, mainly because few isolates are available for study. Therefore, information about Thaumarchaeota was obtained primarily from genomic studies. The aim of this study was to investigate the ecological roles of Thaumarchaeota in the Amazon River and the Amazon River plume.

Results

The archaeal community of the shallow in Amazon River and its plume is dominated by Thaumarchaeota lineages from group 1.1a, which are mainly affiliated to Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis, members of order Nitrosopumilales, Candidatus Nitrosoarchaeum, and Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus sp. While Thaumarchaeota sequences have decreased their relative abundance in the plume, Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus has increased. One genome was recovered from metagenomic data of the Amazon River (ThauR71 [1.05 Mpb]), and two from metagenomic data of the Amazon River plume (ThauP25 [0.94 Mpb] and ThauP41 [1.26 Mpb]). Phylogenetic analysis placed all three Amazon genome bins in Thaumarchaeota Group 1.1a. The annotation revealed that most genes are assigned to the COG subcategory coenzyme transport and metabolism. All three genomes contain genes involved in the hydroxypropionate/hydroxybutyrate cycle, glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle, oxidative phosphorylation. However, ammonia-monooxygenase genes were detected only in ThauP41 and ThauR71. Glycoside hydrolases and auxiliary activities genes were detected only in ThauP25.

Conclusions

Our data indicate that Amazon River is a source of Thaumarchaeota, where these organisms are important for primary production, vitamin production, and nitrification.

Background

Thaumarchaeota was proposed as an archaeal phylum in 2008 [1]. These organisms were previously known as “mesophilic Crenarchaeota” based on phylogenetic analyses of the large-subunit and small-subunit rRNA gene, which weakly suggested that they form a sister group with Crenarchaeota [1,2,3]. However, analysis of ribosomal proteins and comparisons of specific proteins showed that Thaumarchaeota represents a phylum more closely related to Euryarchaeota than to Crenarchaeota [1, 4,5,6]. In addition, genomic analysis showed that Thaumarchaeota possesses genomic features that are not present in either Euryarchaeota or Crenarchaeota [1, 7].

Thaumarchaeota has several lineages that are not yet well defined; the most commonly used nomenclature for these lineages is Groups 1.1a, 1.1a-associated, 1.1b, ThAOA, 1.1c, and 1.3 [8,9,10,11]. Groups 1.1a, 1.1a-associated, ThAOA, and 1.1b, which comprise the class Nitrososphaeria, are the only ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) [9, 12, 13]. The gene encoding ammonia monooxygenase subunit A (amoA) is used as a marker to study the diversity and abundance of AOA in various habitats [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. However, the lack of cultured representatives of AOA has impeded our study of their physiology. Currently, just ten members of group 1.1a [26,27,28], three of 1.1b [28, 29], and two from the order Nitrosocaldales [28] could be cultured as pure isolates. Other members have been studied using enrichment cultures [9, 13]; however, Groups 1.1c and 1.3 have no cultured representatives [11, 30]. Thus, most of our information about Thaumarchaeota originates from genomic studies.

Metagenomics studies indicate that Thaumarchaeota is one of the most abundant archaea on the planet [2, 31]. These ubiquitous organisms [9, 14, 32] are present in the euphotic zone and suboxic, eutrophic, oligotrophic, thermophilic, alkaline, and extremely acidic environments [11, 30, 33,34,35,36,37,38]. They play a major role in nitrification [16, 21, 39, 40] and are crucial in the open ocean, where ammonia concentrations are very low, and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria show low activity [41]. Thaumarchaeota are typically chemolithoautotrophic and fix CO2 using a variant of the hydroxypropionate/hydroxybutyrate (HP/HB) cycle, which is the most energy-efficient aerobic CO2 fixation pathway [30, 42, 43]. However, despite the importance of Thaumarchaeota, their role in several habitats remains underexplored.

Previous studies have confirmed the presence of Thaumarchaeota in the Amazon River [44, 45], which is considered the world’s largest riverine system, accounting for 20% of the global freshwater discharge into the Atlantic Ocean [46, 47]. The Amazon River and its plume carry a large amount of suspended and dissolved terrestrial materials, such as organic matter and nutrients [48, 49]. The plume can travel many hundreds of kilometers and cover ~ 2 million km2, thus contributing to nutrient cycling at a global scale [50,51,52,53]. It therefore affects the entire ecosystem, decreasing luminosity and salinity and increasing biological productivity [54]. The high microbial activity in the Amazon River may contribute to its global-scale environmental effects. Therefore, in this study we performed a detailed phylogenetic and functional analysis of three distinct thaumarchaeal genomes obtained from random shotgun sequencing of DNA from the Amazon River and its plume to infer the ecological roles and possible impacts of Thaumarchaeota in these habitats.

Results

In total, 26,207,858 Paired-end sequencing (PE) reads and 31,379 contigs were recovered from the co-assembly date of Amazon River, plus 38,598,192 PE reads and 138,265 contigs from its plume. Metagenomic analysis showed that Thaumarchaeota was the most abundant archaeal phylum in both the Amazon River and Amazon River plume samples Fig. 1, although the relative abundance of Thaumarchaeota was higher in the river than in its plume. In the Amazon River samples Fig. 1a, Thaumarchaeota comprised approximately 10.85% of the entire microbial while Bacteria 32.91%. The archaeal community is dominated by Thaumarchaeota 97.2%, followed by Euryarchaeota and Crenarchaeota, which comprise less than 1% of the microbial community. The Thaumarchaeota sequences were most phylogenetic related to Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis (Thaumarchaeota archaeon N4; GenBank ID NZ_CBTY000000000.1) (82.1%), followed by other members of order Nitrosopumilales (5.5%) and Candidatus Nitrosoarchaeum (1.6%).

Fig. 1
figure1

Taxonomic visualization of the archaeal communities in samples from the (a) Amazon River and (b) Amazon River plume. The outer to inner circles correspond to species, genus, order, and Archaea phyla, respectively. Percentages indicate the relative abundances of these taxa within the entire microbial community

Full size image

In the plume samples Fig. 1b, Thaumarchaeota comprised approximately 1.01% of the microbial community while Bacteria 80.64%, but was still the most representative Archaea in these samples (87.8%), followed by Euryarchaeota (10.4%). The Archaeal phyla Bathyarchaeota, Crenarchaeota, and Woesearchaeota each comprised less than 1% of the microbial community. Thaumarchaeota sequences in the plume were more phylogenetic related to Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis (37.4%), Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus sp. (13.9%), and other members of order Nitrosopumilales (18.3%) Fig. 1.

General genomic analyses

One near complete genome was recovered from the co-assembly data of the Amazon River (ThauR71 [1.05 Mbp]), and two from co-assembly data of the Amazon River plume (ThauP25 [0.94 Mbp] and ThauP41 [1.26 Mbp]). Phylogenetic analysis placed all three genomes in Thaumarchaeota Group 1.1a (Nitrosopumilales) Fig. 2. ThauP41 and ThauR71 were placed in the same clade as Candidatus Nitrosotenuis cloacae SAT1 and Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis, which correspond to the most abundant taxon in these areas. ThauP25 was placed in the same clade as Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus, which is more abundant in the Amazon River plume (0.16%) than in the Amazon River (< 0.1%).

Fig. 2
figure2

Phylogenetic tree based on six concatenated ribosomal genes. The phylogenetic tree shows the relationship between the Amazon River and plume genomes with other Archaea. Empty circle represent genomes from the Amazon River, and solid circles represent genomes from the Amazon River plume. Sequences were aligned using the multiple sequence alignment program MAFFT, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using PhyML

Full size image

The highest ANI value was calculated between ThauP41 and ThauR71 (98.86%), the other values were below to 95%. The ANI of ThauP41 and ThauR71 among Candidatus Nitrosotenuis cloacae SAT1 was 76%, whereas between ThauP25 and Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus brevis was 81%. The ANI of Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis among the three Thaumarchaeota genomes was below to 73%. All ANI were measured in both directions, but the results never varied by more than 0.01%.

Of the 38 single-copy archaeal genes identified used to measure completeness, the ThauR71 genome contained 37 (97% completeness), the ThauP25 genome contained 35 (92% completeness), and the ThauP41 genome contained 38 (complete), suggesting that each binned genome represented a substantial fraction of a single draft genome. The general features of these three Thaumarchaeota genomes were compared with those of the most closely related genomes: Candidatus Nitrosotenuis cloacae SAT1, Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis (Thaumarchaeota archaeon N4), and Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus brevis CN25 (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of general genome features of three Amazon Thaumarchaeota genomes and their phylogenetically closest members
Full size table

The GC content of ThauP41 and ThauR71 (38%), which are both related to Nitrosotenuis, was greater than that of ThauP25 (33%), which is more closely related to Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus brevis. The GC content of Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis N4 was higher than the genomes obtained in this study (42.25%).

The estimated number of CDSs was 1454 for ThauR71, 1406 for ThauP25, and 1721 for ThauP41, with functions predicted for approximately 63% of these genes (40–45% predicted using the COG database); approximately 33% did not have predicted functions. The percentage of CDSs predicted to be signal peptides was 1.2–2.9% for the three genomes obtained in this study, which is similar to that of Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis, Candidatus Nitrosotenuis cloacae, and Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus brevis (2.6–4.6%). Similarly, the percentage of CDSs predicted to be transmembrane proteins for the genomes obtained in this study (15.9–18.0%) is similar to that of Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis, Candidatus Nitrosotenuis cloacae, and Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus brevis (19.0–22.0%).

The distribution of CDSs with predicted function was similar for the Amazon River and plume genomes, which shared 186 CDSs Fig. 3. However, there was a greater number of shared CDSs between ThauP41 and ThauR71 (175) than between ThauP41 and ThauP25 (62), which were from the same habitat. The number of unique CDSs in ThauP25 (189) was higher than that of ThauP41 (136) and ThauR71 (79). Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis N4 shared 39 CDSs with ThauP25, 38 CDSs with ThauP41, and 33 CDSs with ThauP71. A total of 137 CDSs were shared by all four Thaumarchaeota genomes analyzed.

Fig. 3
figure3

Venn diagram of CDSs that are unique or shared between ThauP25, ThauP41, ThauR71, and Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis N4 (N4)

Full size image

To analyze the three Amazon River and plume genomes, we used the COG database [55] to assign CDSs to the following main functional categories: metabolism, cellular processes and signaling, information storage and processing, and poorly characterized. Within the metabolism category, the highest percentage of genes was assigned to the subcategory coenzyme transport and metabolism (11–12%), which consists of genes involved mainly in the synthesis of cobalamin, biotin, pantothenate, menaquinone, phylloquinone, siroheme, coenzyme F430, coenzyme A, cytochrome c oxidase, coenzyme A, and bacteriochlorophyll c and d. Coenzyme transport and metabolism genes were most abundant in ThauP25 (12.52%), followed by ThauR71 (11.75%). The abundance of genes in other metabolism subcategories was 8–9% for amino acid transport and metabolism, 5–7% for energy production and conversion, 5–6% for nucleotide transport and metabolism, 5% for inorganic ion transport and metabolism, 4–5% for carbohydrate transport and metabolism, 2–3% for lipid transport and metabolism, and 1% for secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport, and catabolism.

In the cellular processes and signaling category, the highest percentage of genes was assigned to the subcategory posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones (5–6%), followed by signal transduction mechanisms (1–2%), wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis (1–2%), cell cycle control, cell division, chromosome partitioning (1%), defense mechanisms (1%), intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport (0.8–1%), and cell motility (0.3–0.8%).

For the information storage and processing category, the highest percentage of genes was assigned to the subcategory translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis (15–17%), followed by transcription (4–5%), and replication, recombination, and repair (3%). Genes assigned to the subcategories of chromatin structure and dynamics (< 1%) and RNA processing and modification (< 1%) were not present in all three genomes. Some genes were considered poorly characterized or had only general function predicted (6–7%), or function was unknown (3%) (Table 2). The percentages described above for each category represent the range of these genes in the three genomes obtained in this study.

Table 2 Comparison of gene content by COG functional categories
Full size table

Ecophysiology

All three genomes obtained in this study contained genes involved in energy conversion by nitrogen metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, sulfur metabolism. Genes for carbon fixation were also found in these genomes, they had genes representing a near-complete hydroxypropionate/hydroxybutyrate (HP/HB) cycle and the presence of the gene encoding acetyl/propionyl-CoA carboxylase, which is responsible for HCO3 assimilation. However, genes encoding malonyl-CoA reductase and succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase were not detected in any of the genomes. The three genomes also contained genes for carbon fixation through the Calvin cycle, but the ribulose 1,5-biphosphate carboxylase were not detected for these genomes.

For nitrogen metabolism, genes encoding ammonia monooxygenase were detected in ThauP41 (amoA, amoB, and amoC) and ThauR71 (amoB and amoC) but not in ThauP25. All three Amazon River and plume genomes contained nirK, which is involved in the production of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide, as well as genes involved in glycolysis, TCA cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation.

Analysis of carbohydrate-active enzymes showed that GH genes were detected just in ThauP25, which have 5 genes from the GH1 family (Additional file 2: Table S1). Genes assigned to the enzyme classes AA (15 genes from AA1 family) were only detected in ThauP25. The families GT1 and GT2 were detected in all three genomes, whereas the ThauP25 has the higher abundance of GT2 (123 vs. mean of 57.5). The family GT66 were just detected for ThauP41 and ThauR71, whereas GT7 and GT90 were just detected for ThauR71. The enzyme classes CE was not detected in any of these genomes.

The genomes ThauP41 and ThauR71 encode a complete assimilatory sulfate reduction pathway, whereas in ThauP25 the sir gene was not detected. In addition, genes specific for the anaerobic synthesis of cobalamin were detected in ThauP25, ThauP41 (gbix, cbiG, and cbiD), and ThauR71 (cbiG and cbiD). Genes of the second cluster of biosynthesis of cobalamin were also detected in ThauR71 (cobY, cobS, cobD, and cobQ), the likewise occurs for ThauP25 and ThauP41, though, cboQ was not detected.

All three Thaumarchaeota genomes contained the complete set of genes for transport of zinc (znuA, znuB, znuC). Moreover, it was detected genes for transport of phosphate (pstS, pstA, pstC, pstB) and lipoprotein (lolC, lolE, lolD) in ThauP41.

Discussion

Because of the lack of representative Thaumarchaeota genomes, our metagenomics analysis classified many of the sequences obtained in our study as unknown Fig. 1. Most of the sequences of the Thaumarchaeota from the Amazon River and its plume were assigned to members of group 1.1a (Nitrosopumilales) [13] or Marine Group I [2, 19, 56]), suggesting that this is the most abundant archaeal group in these habitats. These results are consistent with previous studies that report that 73% of Thaumarchaeota from estuarine-coastal AOA belong to Nitrosopumilales, and 37% are associated specifically with the clade of Nitrosopumilus spp. [13]. The relative abundance of Thaumarchaeota was higher in the Amazon River than in its plume, which might be attributed to the difference in their physical and chemical characteristics. Salinity is lower in the Amazon River (0.01–0.02 g/kg) than in its plume (12.17–36.34 g/kg), as is pH (6.58–6.99 vs. 7.67–8.1) and surface dissolved inorganic carbon (113–502 vs. 818–2030 μmol·C/kg). In contrast, partial pressure of carbon dioxide is higher in the Amazon River (1039–5488 μatm) than its plume (234–569 μatm), as is ammonium (0.72–3.12 vs. 0.0–0.014 μM), nitrate + nitrite (5.64–17.9 vs 0.0–8.52 μM), and dissolved organic carbon (244–381 vs. 61–191 μM) [57]. The higher pressure of carbon dioxide in the Amazon River is probably associated with heterotrophic carbon processing of allochthones organic matter derived from plant material [58, 59]. Ammonium, nitate+nitrite and dissolved carbon concentrations may also be associated with the allochthones organic matter input from de surrounding Amazon forest [60]. Thus, greater availability of nitrogen ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite suggests the pro-dominance of Thaumarchaeota Group 1.1a, since they are nitrifying Archaea. Soil metagenomics studies have also found that Group 1.1a is associated with higher nitrate concentrations and lower pH (5 ≤ pH < 7) [11, 61]. Furthermore, the clades NP-η (Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis) and NP-γ (Nitrosopumilus spp.) appear to be associated with low-salinity and freshwater environments [13, 62, 63], which would account for the considerable decrease in Thaumarchaeota in Amazon River plume, since the most abundant taxa in our analysis belong to these clades. Nevertheless, the change from estuarine to marine environment would explain the increase of clade NP-ε (Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus), which suggests niche specialization to plume habitat that is correlated with saturation of dissolved oxygen, surface dissolved inorganic carbon, pH, and salinity. Other studies have corroborated the association of this clade with seawater [13]. In addition, clades NP-ε (Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus) and NP-γ (Nitrosopumilus) are associated with “shallow” water (Water Column A) [13, 64,65,66,67,68,69]. These findings may account for the abundance of Group 1.1a and the low representation of Groups 1.1a-associated, 1.1b, ThAOA, 1.1c, and 1.3. Thaumarchaeota represent an important fraction of the microbial community in the Amazon River. Although more abundant in the Amazon River, their presence in the plume extending to the Atlantic Ocean.

The genomes recovered in this study (ThauP25, ThauP41, and ThauR71) were assigned to the most abundant taxa of these environments Fig. 1. However, it happens probably because of lack of the known species in the database, since ANI analysis suggests that these genomes represent different Thaumarchaeota species from those of literature. Studies have shown that ANI values equal to approximately 95% correspond to the cut-off values of 70% similarity used on DNA-DNA hybridization as a standard for the classification of new species [70,71,72,73]. Therefore, ThauP41, and ThauP25 belong to known genera according to the presented phylogeny.

Our findings suggest that these organisms are prototroph for cobalamin (vitamin B12), biotin (vitamin B7), pantothenate (vitamin B5), menaquinone (vitamin K2), and phylloquinone (vitamin K1) and not require uptake, which has previously been shown by culture of AOA without vitamin supplements [27, 74]. Other studies have reported that Thaumarchaeota plays an important role in the global production of cobalamin [75], thus Thaumarchaeota may be acting and the production of vitamins to this environment.

These three recovered genomes contain genes for the HP/HB cycle, although genes encoding malonyl-CoA reductase and succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase were not identified. However, many genes encoding enzymes in Thaumarchaeota do not have homologs in databases and cannot be identified using bioinformatics approach, including a malonyl-CoA reductase in Nitrosopumilus maritmus [43, 69, 76]. N. maritmus has an alternative enzyme for this step, malonic semialdehyde reductase, which was detected by homology in ThauP25 and ThauP41. AOA are thought to be major contributors to carbon fixation in oceans [77], indicating these organisms contribute to primary production in Atlantic Ocean. On the other hand, the high nutrient and CO2 levels in the Amazon River [78] may increase primary production, leading to eutrophication, higher consumption of dissolved oxygen. The presence of genes encoding glycosyl hydrolases detected in ThauP25 and proteins involved in glycolysis and the TCA cycle suggests that these organisms mixotrophic metabolism, which supports the hypothesis that Thaumarchaeota are not only chemoautotrophic [30]. Previously studies have shown that addition of organic acids can improve the growth of N. maritimus [27], furthermore, they demonstrate that the metabolism of some Thaumarchaeota keeps activated when nitrification inhibitor was added [79].

Two of the genomes (ThauP41 and ThauR71) suggest participation in nitrification; however, the most likely reason that AOA genes were not detected in ThauP25 is that this genome is not complete. The gene nirK was detected in all three genomes, indicating participation in the production of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide, which was demonstrated by heterologous expression of nirK from Nitrososphaera viennensis [80]. The presence of genes encoding coenzyme F420 are widespread in Thaumarchaeota genomes [9, 81]. This coenzyme has been detected in high amount in a proteomic study [82], suggesting an important role in its metabolism. The most probable hypothesis for this coenzyme is a protective role against reactive nitrogen species like observed in mycobacteria [83].

Conclusions

Thaumarchaeota is the most abundant archaeal phylum in the Amazon River and Amazon River plume. Both areas are dominated by taxa closely related to Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis. The relative abundance of these Thaumarchaeota is associated with neutral to acidic pH and higher concentrations of nitrate, nitrite, and ammonia. The three genomes obtained in this study provide evidence of a typical Thaumarchaeota metabolism, with energy production by nitrification and carbon assimilation through the HP/HB cycle, suggesting that they are autotrophs. The presence of genes related to the TCA cycle and glycolysis suggest mixotrophic metabolism. In addition, these genomes contain genes involved in the production of nitrous oxide, and vitamins. Similarities between the genomes of Thaumarchaeota from the Amazon River and its plume suggest that all three organisms are present in both habitats, with the Amazon River representing a potential source of Thaumarchaeota in this habitat, where these organisms are of paramount importance.

Methods

Sampling and DNA extraction

We collected and analyzed 12 water samples from the Amazon River and its plume as described by Silva et al. 2017 [57]. Microbial DNA from samples preserved in SET buffer (20% sucrose, 50 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM Tris HCl) was extracted using the NucleoSpin Tissue kit (Macherey-Nagel, Dueren, Germany) with the following modifications for DNA extraction from Sterivex™ filters [84]: after incubation with lysozyme (final concentration 0.1%) at 37 °C for 60 min, 20% SDS (final concentration 1%) with proteinase K was added to the samples at 37 °C for 30 min, followed by washing with chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1) solution. The extracted DNA was analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (1% agarose in 1× Tris-borate-EDTA) and then quantified spectrophotometrically with a NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Scientific, DE, USA) and enzymatically with a Qubit High Sensitivity Fluorometer (Life Technologies). The DNA was amplified with the GenomiPhi V3 Kit (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer’s instructions but with the amplification time increased to 16 h or 18 h [85].

Illumina library construction and sequencing

DNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina). Library size distribution was determined using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and High Sensitivity DNA Kit (Agilent) and quantified using the Applied Biosystems 7500 Real Time PCR System and KAPA Library Quantification Kit (Kapa Biosystems). The PhiX sequencing control v3 (Illumina) was added at 1%, and paired-end sequencing (2 × 250 bp) was performed on a MiSeq System (Illumina).

Metagenomic analysis, binning, and annotation

Reads were trimmed and quality checked using Sickle version 1.33 with default parameters. The reads of the five samples of Amazon River (Tapajós, Óbidos, North Macapá, South Macapá, and Belém) were combined and then assembled into scaffolds using IDBA-ud [86]. The same was proceed for the seven samples (St1, St3, St4, St6, St10, St11, and St15) of the Amazon River plume. All metagenome data from each sample were uploaded to ggKbase.

The microbial community classification was based on phylogenetic makeup among the genes that compose a specific contig. When more than 50% of the genes that make up a contig belong to an organism in the NCBI database, taxonomic attribution is given. The taxonomy of sequences from the Amazon River and its plume was visualized using the “View project taxonomy” tool. All this information is available on the website (https://ggkbase-help.berkeley.edu/).

Genomes were binned using ggKbase binning tools (ggkbase.berkeley.edu) and manually curated to remove scaffolds with anomalous GC content, coverage, or taxonomic classification [87]. Genome completeness was estimated based on 38 archaeal single-copy genes, as described previously [88, 89]. Each assembled genome was uploaded to the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system at the US Department of Energy’s Joint Genome Institute for annotation [90, 91].

Protein-coding genes of ThauP25, ThauP41, ThauR71, and N4 were assigned to COG & KOG functional category [55] by comparison to COG PSSMs using RPS-BLAST with E-value cutoff of 1e-2, and minimum alignment length of 70% of the consensus sequence length with the top hit [91].

Metabolic reconstruction and pathway mapping of each assembled genome was completed using the KEGG Automatic Annotation Server [92].

Catalytic and carbohydrate-binding modules of enzymes that degrade, modify, or create glycosidic bonds were identified by searching against the Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes database (http://www.cazy.org/) [93] using Diamond version 0.9.22 [94] with E-value cutoff of <1e-102. These enzymes and associated modules include glycoside hydrolases (GHs), enzymes with auxiliary activities (AAs), carbohydrate esterases (CEs), glycosyl transferases (GTs), and carbohydrate-binding modules (CBMs).

We construct a Venn diagram using the gplots package in R software [95] to identify unique and shared genes, utilizing protein-coding genes with predicted function of Candidatus Nitrosopelagicus brevis bin25 (ThauP25; IMG Genome ID 2781125713), Candidatus Nitrosotenuis sp. bin41 (ThauP41; IMG Genome ID 2781125712), Candidatus Nitrosotenuis sp. bin71 (ThauR71; IMG Genome ID 2778260922), and Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis N4 (N4; IMG Genome ID 2619619229). We compared the genomes acquired in this study (ThauP25, ThauP41, and ThauR71) with the genome of Candidatus Nitrosotenuis uzonensis N4, isolated from geothermal environments [96].

Phylogenetic analysis

To construct the phylogenetic tree, sequences of the concatenated ribosomal genes S11, S7, S2, L21, L11, and L3 were aligned with MAFFT version 7.388 [97], using default parameters, and then manually edited to delete the extra end of the long sequences. The phylogenetic tree was constructed in PhyML version 20,131,022 [98] with the BLOSUM62 matrix and 1000 bootstrap replications. The Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) was calculated using a Pairwise ANI tools available on IMG [90, 99]. The GenBank accession numbers of these sequences are available in Additional file 1: Dataset S1.

Availability of data and materials

Genomes described in this article are available on the Integrated Microbial Genomes system (Accession numbers: ThauP25; IMG Genome ID 2781125713, ThauP41; IMG Genome ID 2781125712, ThauR71; IMG Genome ID 2778260922). Accession numbers of sequences used to construct the phylogenetic tree are available in the Supplemental Material Dataset S1.

Abbreviations

ANI:

Average Nucleotide Identity

AOA:

Ammonia-oxidizing archaea

CDS:

Coding sequence

CE:

Carbohydrate esterase

COG:

Clusters of orthologous groups

DNA:

Deoxyribonucleic acid

GH:

Glycoside hydrolase

GT:

Glycosyl transferase

HP/HB:

Hydroxypropionate/Hydroxybutyrate

PE:

Paired-end sequencing

RNA:

Ribonucleic acid

rRNA:

Ribosomal RNA

TCA:

Tricarboxylic acid cycle

tRNA

Transfer RNA

References

  1. 1.

    Brochier-Armanet C, Boussau B, Gribaldo S, Forterre P. Mesophilic crenarchaeota: Proposal for a third archaeal phylum, the Thaumarchaeota. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:245–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Delong EF. Archaea in coastal marine environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5685–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Schleper C, Jurgens G, Jonuscheit M. Genomic studies of uncultivated archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:479–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Matte-Tailliez O, Brochier C, Forterre P, Philippe H. Archael phylogeny based on ribosomal proteins. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19:631–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Spang A, Hatzenpichler R, Brochier-Armanet C, Rattei T, Tischler P, Spieck E, et al. Distinct gene set in two different lineages of ammonia-oxidizing archaea supports the phylum Thaumarchaeota. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18:331–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Petitjean C, Deschamps P, López-Garciá P, Moreira D. Rooting the domain archaea by phylogenomic analysis supports the foundation of the new kingdom Proteoarchaeota. Genome Biol Evol. 2014;7:191–204.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brochier-Armanet C, Gribaldo S, Forterre P. Spotlight on the Thaumarchaeota. ISME J. 2012;6:227–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hallam SJ, Konstantinidis KT, Putnam N, Schleper C, Watanabe Y, Sugahara J, et al. Genomic analysis of the uncultivated marine crenarchaeote Cenarchaeum symbiosum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:18296–301.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Stieglmeier M, RJE A, Schleper C. The Prokaryotes; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Lin X, Handley KM, Gilbert JA, Kostka JE. Metabolic potential of fatty acid oxidation and anaerobic respiration by abundant members of Thaumarchaeota and Thermoplasmata in deep anoxic peat. ISME J. 2015;9:2740–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Oton EV, Quince C, Nicol GW, Prosser JI, Gubry-Rangin C. Phylogenetic congruence and ecological coherence in terrestrial Thaumarchaeota. ISME J. 2016;10:85–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kerou M, Alves RJE, Schleper C. Stieglmeier, Klingl, Alves, Rittmann, Melcher, Leisch and Schleper 2014a, 2747; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Alves RJE, Minh BQ, Urich T, Von Haeseler A, Schleper C. Unifying the global phylogeny and environmental distribution of ammonia-oxidising archaea based on amoA genes. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Francis CA, Roberts KJ, Beman JM, Santoro AE, Oakley BB. Ubiquity and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in water columns and sediments of the ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102:14683–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Treusch AH, Leininger S, Kietzin A, Schuster SC, Klenk HP, Schleper C. Novel genes for nitrite reductase and Amo-related proteins indicate a role of uncultivated mesophilic crenarchaeota in nitrogen cycling. Environ Microbiol. 2005;7:1985–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Leininger S, Urich T, Schloter M, Schwark L, Qi J, Nicol GW, et al. Archaea predominate among ammonia-oxidizing prokaryotes in soils. Nature. 2006;442:806–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mincer TJ, Church MJ, Taylor LT, Preston C, Karl DM, DeLong EF. Quantitative distribution of presumptive archaeal and bacterial nitrifiers in Monterey Bay and the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:1162–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Adair KL, Schwartz E. Evidence that ammonia-oxidizing archaea are more abundant than ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in semiarid soils of northern Arizona, USA. Microb Ecol. 2008;56:420–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Agogué H, Brink M, Dinasquet J, Herndl GJ. Major gradients in putatively nitrifying and non-nitrifying Archaea in the deep North Atlantic. Nature. 2008;456:788–92.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Reigstad LJ, Richter A, Daims H, Urich T, Schwark L, Schleper C. Nitrification in terrestrial hot springs of Iceland and Kamchatka. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;64:167–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shen JP, Zhang LM, Zhu YG, Zhang JB, He JZ. Abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea communities of an alkaline sandy loam. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:1601–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Dang H, Luan XW, Chen R, Zhang X, Guo L, Klotz MG. Diversity, abundance and distribution of amoA-encoding archaea in deep-sea methane seep sediments of the Okhotsk Sea. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;72:370–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gubry-Rangin C, Nicol GW, Prosser JI. Archaea rather than bacteria control nitrification in two agricultural acidic soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;74:566–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mussmann M, Brito I, Pitcher A, Sinninghe Damste JS, Hatzenpichler R, Richter A, et al. Thaumarchaeotes abundant in refinery nitrifying sludges express amoA but are not obligate autotrophic ammonia oxidizers. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:16771–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zheng M, Fu HZ, Ho YS. Research trends and hotspots related to ammonia oxidation based on bibliometric analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:20409–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Könneke M, Bernhard AE, De La Torre JR, Walker CB, Waterbury JB, Stahl DA. Isolation of an autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing marine archaeon. Nature. 2005;437:543–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Qin W, Heal KR, Ramdasi R, Kobelt JN, Martens-Habbena W, Bertagnolli AD, et al. Nitrosopumilus maritimus gen. nov., sp. nov., Nitrosopumilus cobalaminigenes sp. nov., Nitrosopumilus oxyclinae sp. nov., and Nitrosopumilus ureiphilus sp. nov., four marine ammoniaoxidizing archaea of the phylum thaumarchaeo. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:5067–79.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Stein LY. Insights into the physiology of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2019;49:9–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Tourna M, Stieglmeier M, Spang A, Könneke M, Schintlmeister A, Urich T, et al. textlessem\textgreaterNitrososphaera viennensis\textless/em\textgreater, an ammonia oxidizing archaeon from soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:8420 LP – 8425.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Pester M, Schleper C, Wagner M. The Thaumarchaeota: An emerging view of their phylogeny and ecophysiology. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2011;14:300–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Karner MB, Delong EF, Karl DM. Archaeal dominance in the mesopelagic zone of the Pacific Ocean. Nature. 2001;409:507–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ochsenreiter T, Selezi D, Quaiser A, Bonch-Osmolovskaya L, Schleper C. Diversity and abundance of Crenarchaeota in terrestrial habitats studied by 16S RNA surveys and real time PCR. Environ Microbiol. 2003;5:787–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tolar BB, King GM, Hollibaugh JT. An analysis of thaumarchaeota populations from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Erguder TH, Boon N, Wittebolle L, Marzorati M, Verstraete W. Environmental factors shaping the ecological niches of ammonia-oxidizing archaea. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33:855–69.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lehtovirta-Morley LE, Stoecker K, Vilcinskas A, Prosser JI, Nicol GW. Cultivation of an obligate acidophilic ammonia oxidizer from a nitrifying acid soil. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:15892–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hu A, Yang Z, Yu CP, Jiao N. Dynamics of Autotrophic Marine Planktonic Thaumarchaeota in the East China Sea. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:20–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Vissers EW, Blaga CI, Bodelier PLE, Muyzer G, Schleper C, Sinninghe Damsté JS, et al. Seasonal and vertical distribution of putative ammonia-oxidizing thaumarchaeotal communities in an oligotrophic lake. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2013;83:515–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    De La Torre JR, Walker CB, Ingalls AE, Könneke M, Stahl DA. Cultivation of a thermophilic ammonia oxidizing archaeon synthesizing crenarchaeol. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:810–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Wuchter C, Abbas B, Coolen MJL, Herfort L, van Bleijswijk J, Timmers P, et al. Archaeal nitrification in the ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:12317–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Stahl DA, de la Torre JR. Physiology and Diversity of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2012;66:83–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Martens-Habbena W, Berube PM, Urakawa H, De La Torre JR, Stahl DA. Ammonia oxidation kinetics determine niche separation of nitrifying Archaea and Bacteria. Nature. 2009;461:976–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Walker CB, de la Torre JR, Klotz MG, Urakawa H, Pinel N, Arp DJ, et al. Nitrosopumilus maritimus genome reveals unique mechanisms for nitrification and autotrophy in globally distributed marine crenarchaea. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:8818–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Konneke M, Schubert DM, Brown PC, Hugler M, Standfest S, Schwander T, et al. Ammonia-oxidizing archaea use the most energy-efficient aerobic pathway for CO2 fixation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:8239–44.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Satinsky BM, Crump BC, Smith CB, Sharma S, Zielinski BL, Doherty M, et al. Microspatial gene expression patterns in the Amazon River Plume. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:11085–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Satinsky BM, Smith CB, Sharma S, Ward ND, Krusche AV, Richey JE, et al. Patterns of Bacterial and Archaeal Gene Expression through the Lower Amazon River. Front Mar Sci. 2017;4:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Richey JE, Hedges JI, Devol AH, Quay PD, Victoria R, Martinelli L, et al. Biogeochemistry of carbon in the Amazon River. Limnol Oceanogr. 1990;35:352–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Dai A, Trenberth KE. Estimates of Freshwater Discharge from Continents: Latitudinal and Seasonal Variations. J Hydrometeorol. 2002;3:660–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kang Y, Pan D, Bai Y, He X, Chen X, Chen CTA, et al. Areas of the global major river plumes. Acta Oceanologica Sinica. 2013;32:79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Horner-Devine AR, Hetland RD, MacDonald DG. Mixing and Transport in Coastal River Plumes. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2015;47:569–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lentz SJ. Seasonal variations in the horizontal structure of the Amazon plume inferred from historical hydrographic data. J Geophys Res. 1995;100:2391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Lentz SJ. The Amazon River plume during AMASSEDS: subtidal current variability and the importance of wind forcing. J Geophys Res. 1995;100:2377–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Körtzinger A. A significant CO 2 sink in the tropical Atlantic Ocean associated with the Amazon River plume. Geophys Res Lett. 2003;30:2–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Cooley SR, Coles VJ, Subramaniam A, Yager PL. Seasonal variations in the Amazon plume-related atmospheric carbon sink. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2007;21:1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Moura RL, Amado-Filho GM, Moraes FC, Brasileiro PS, Salomon PS, Mahiques MM, et al. An extensive reef system at the Amazon River mouth - Supplementary Material. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1501252.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Tatusov RL. A Genomic Perspective on Protein Families. Science. 1997;278:631–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Massana R, Delong EF, Pedrós-Alió C. A few cosmopolitan phylotypes dominate planktonic archaeal assemblages in widely different oceanic provinces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:1777–87.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Silva BSO, Coutinho FH, Gregoracci GB, Leomil L, de Oliveira LS, Fróes A, et al. Virioplankton assemblage structure in the lower river and ocean continuum of the Amazon. mSphere. 2017;2:e00366–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Mayorga E, Aufdenkampe AK, Masiello CA, Krusche AV, Hedges JI, Quay PD, et al. Young organic matter as a source of carbon dioxide outgassing from Amazonian rivers. Nature. 2005;436:538–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sawakuchi HO, Neu V, Ward ND, de LC BM, Valerio AM, Gagne-Maynard W, et al. Carbon Dioxide Emissions along the Lower Amazon River. Front Mar Sci. 2017;4:76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Tank JL, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Griffiths NA, Entrekin SA, Stephen ML. A review of allochthonous organic matter dynamics and metabolism in streams. J North Am Benthol Soc. 2010;29:118–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Gubry-Rangin C, Hai B, Quince C, Engel M, Thomson BC, James P, et al. Niche specialization of terrestrial archaeal ammonia oxidizers. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:21206–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Mosier AC, Francis CA. Relative abundance and diversity of ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria in the San Francisco Bay estuary. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:3002–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Restrepo-Ortiz CX, Auguet JC, Casamayor EO. Targeting spatiotemporal dynamics of planktonic SAGMGC-1 and segregation of ammonia-oxidizing thaumarchaeota ecotypes by newly designed primers and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:689–700.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Hallam SJ, Mincer TJ, Schleper C, Preston CM, Roberts K, Richardson PM, et al. Pathways of carbon assimilation and ammonia oxidation suggested by environmental genomic analyses of marine Crenarchaeota. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:520–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Beman JM, Popp BN, Francis CA. Molecular and biogeochemical evidence for ammonia oxidation by marine Crenarchaeota in the Gulf of California. ISME J. 2008;2:429–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Santoro AE, Casciotti KL. Enrichment and characterization of ammonia-oxidizing archaea from the open ocean: Phylogeny, physiology and stable isotope fractionation. ISME J. 2011;5:1796–808.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sintes E, Bergauer K, De Corte D, Yokokawa T, Herndl GJ. Archaeal amoA gene diversity points to distinct biogeography of ammonia-oxidizing Crenarchaeota in the ocean. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:1647–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Luo H, Tolar BB, Swan BK, Zhang CL, Stepanauskas R, Ann Moran M, et al. Single-cell genomics shedding light on marine Thaumarchaeota diversification. ISME J. 2014;8:732–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Tolar BB, Ross MJ, Wallsgrove NJ, Liu Q, Aluwihare LI, Popp BN, et al. Contribution of ammonia oxidation to chemoautotrophy in Antarctic coastal waters. ISME J. 2016;10:2605–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Richter M, Rossello-Mora R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:19126–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Chan JZM, Halachev MR, Loman NJ, Constantinidou C, Pallen MJ. Defining bacterial species in the genomic era: Insights from the genus Acinetobacter. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:81–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI, Truper HG, et al. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1987;37:463–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Jung MY, Islam MA, Gwak JH, Kim JG, Rhee SK. Nitrosarchaeum koreense gen. Nov., sp. nov., an aerobic and mesophilic, ammonia-oxidizing archaeon member of the phylum thaumarchaeota isolated from agricultural soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2018;68:3084–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Doxey AC, Kurtz DA, Lynch MDJ, Sauder LA, Neufeld JD. Aquatic metagenomes implicate Thaumarchaeota in global cobalamin production. ISME J. 2015;9:461–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Otte J, Mall A, Schubert DM. K�nneke M, Berg IA. Malonic semialdehyde reductase from the archaeon Nitrosopumilus maritimus is involved in the autotrophic 3-hydroxypropionate/4- hydroxybutyrate cycle. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:1700–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Hansman RL, Griffin S, Watson JT, Druffel ERM, Ingalls AE, Pearson A, et al. The radiocarbon signature of microorganisms in the mesopelagic ocean. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:6513–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Richey JE, Melack JM, Aufdenkampe AK, Ballester VM, Hess LL. Outgassing from Amazonia rivers and wetlands as a large tropical source of atmospheric CO2. Nature. 2002;416:617–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Jia Z, Conrad R. Bacteria rather than Archaea dominate microbial ammonia oxidation in an agricultural soil. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:1658–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Kobayashi S, Hira D, Yoshida K, Toyofuku M, Shida Y, Ogasawara W, et al. Nitric Oxide Production from Nitrite Reduction and Hydroxylamine Oxidation by Copper-containing Dissimilatory Nitrite Reductase (NirK) from the Aerobic Ammonia-oxidizing Archaeon, Nitrososphaera viennensis. Microbes Environ. 2018;33:428–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Spang A, Poehlein A, Offre P, Zumbrägel S, Haider S, Rychlik N, et al. The genome of the ammonia-oxidizing candidatus nitrososphaera gargensis: Insights into metabolic versatility and environmental adaptations. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:3122–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Kerou M, Offre P, Valledor L, Abby SS, Melcher M, Nagler M, et al. Proteomics and comparative genomics of Nitrososphaera viennensis reveal the core genome and adaptations of archaeal ammonia oxidizers. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:E7937–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Purwantini E, Mukhopadhyay B. Conversion of NO2 to NO by reduced coenzyme F420 protects mycobacteria from nitrosative damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2009;106:6333–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Bruce T, Meirelles PM, Garcia G, Paranhos R, Rezende CE, de Moura RL, et al. Abrolhos bank reef health evaluated by means of water quality, microbial diversity, benthic cover, and fish biomass data. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e36687.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Thurber RV, Haynes M, Breitbart M, Wegley L, Rohwer F. Laboratory procedures to generate viral metagenomes. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:470–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Peng Y, Leung HCM, Yiu SM, Chin FYL. IDBA-UD: A de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1420–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Wrighton KC, Thomas BC, Sharon I, Miller CS, Castelle CJ, VerBerkmoes NC, et al. Fermentation, hydrogen, and sulfur metabolism in multiple uncultivated bacterial phyla. Science. 2012;337:1661–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Raveh-Sadka T, Thomas BC, Singh A, Firek B, Brooks B, Castelle CJ, et al. Gut bacteria are rarely shared by co-hospitalized premature infants, regardless of necrotizing enterocolitis development. eLife. 2015;2015:1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Probst AJ, Castelle CJ, Singh A, Brown CT, Anantharaman K, Sharon I, et al. Genomic resolution of a cold subsurface aquifer community provides metabolic insights for novel microbes adapted to high CO2concentrations. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:459–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Chen IMA, Markowitz VM, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Szeto E, Pillay M, et al. IMG/M: Integrated genome and metagenome comparative data analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D507–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Huntemann M, Ivanova NN, Mavromatis K, Tripp HJ, Paez-Espino D, Palaniappan K, et al. The standard operating procedure of the DOE-JGI Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MGAP v.4). Stand Genomic Sci. 2015;10:86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Moriya Y, Itoh M, Okuda S, Yoshizawa AC, Kanehisa M. KAAS: An automatic genome annotation and pathway reconstruction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(SUPPL.2):182–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:490–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2014;12:59–60.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Development Core Team R. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Lebedeva EV, Hatzenpichler R, Pelletier E, Schuster N, Hauzmayer S, Bulaev A, et al. Enrichment and genome sequence of the group I.1a ammonia-oxidizing archaeon “Ca. Nitrosotenuis uzonensis” representing a clade globally distributed in thermal habitats. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Guindon S, Delsuc F, Dufayard J-F, Gascuel O. Estimating Maximum Likelihood Phylogenies with PhyML. In: Posada D, editor. Bioinformatics for DNA Sequence Analysis. Totowa: Humana Press; 2009. p. 113–37.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Varghese NJ, Mukherjee S, Ivanova N, Konstantinidis KT, Mavrommatis K, Kyrpides NC, et al. Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:6761–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), and Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAP-DF) for financial support. Pinto, Silva and Lopes acknowledge fellowships from Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). We would like to thank Dr. Jillian F. Banfield and Brian C. Thomas from the UC Berkeley for the use of the ggKbase pipeline.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), which also provided financial support for the first author (OP), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), and Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAP-DF). The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Enzymology, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasília, Brasilia, 70910-900, Brazil

    Otávio H. B. Pinto, Thais F. Silva, Carla S. Vizzotto & Ricardo H. Kruger

  2. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Brasília, Brasilia, 70910-900, Brazil

    Carla S. Vizzotto

  3. Federal Institute of Brasília, Brasilia, 70830-450, Brazil

    Renata H. Santana

  4. Laboratory of Microbiology, Federal University of Tocantins, Palmas, 77500-000, Brazil

    Fabyano A. C. Lopes

  5. Department of Genetics, Institute of Biology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-901, Brazil

    Bruno S. Silva & Fabiano L. Thompson

Authors
  1. Otávio H. B. Pinto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thais F. Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carla S. Vizzotto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Renata H. Santana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fabyano A. C. Lopes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Bruno S. Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Fabiano L. Thompson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ricardo H. Kruger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RK, TS, CV, and RS designed the experiments. Data analyses were performed by OP and FL, data collection by FT and BS. The manuscript was draft by OP and revised by all authors. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo H. Kruger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1:

Dataset S1. provides GenBank accession numbers and ribosomal gene sequences for the genomes used to construct the phylogenetic tree.

Additional file 2:

Table S1. lists the protein families of the Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes database detected in the genomes of ThauP25, ThauP41, and ThauR71.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pinto, O.H.B., Silva, T.F., Vizzotto, C.S. et al. Genome-resolved metagenomics analysis provides insights into the ecological role of Thaumarchaeota in the Amazon River and its plume. BMC Microbiol 20, 13 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-1698-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Thaumarchaeota
  • Amazon River
  • Amazon River plume
  • Metagenome-assembled genome

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us