Skip to main content
Download PDF

Xylitol and erythritol inhibit real-time biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans

BMC Microbiology volume 20, Article number: 184 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Regular consumption of xylitol decreases the number of cariogenic streptococci in dental plaque. In vitro biofilm models to study the mechanism of xylitol action have been set-up, but the obtained results are contradictory. Biofilm growth is a dynamic process with time-specific characteristics that may remain undetected in conventional end-point biofilm tests. In this study we used an impedance spectroscopy instrument, xCELLigence Real Time Cell Analyzer (RTCA), that allows label-free, non-invasive real-time monitoring of biofilm formation, to explore effects of xylitol on biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans. Based on the obtained information of biofilm dynamics, we assessed the number of viable bacteria, the polysaccharide content, and the expression levels of selected genes involved in glucan-mediated biofilm formation in different biofilm stages. Xylitol inhibition was compared with that of erythritol; another polyol suggested to have a positive impact on oral health.

Results

Our results showed that real-time monitoring provided new information of polyol-induced changes in S. mutans biofilm formation dynamics. The inhibitory effect of polyols was more pronounced in the early stages of biofilm formation but affected also the measured total amount of formed biofilm. Effects seen in the real-time biofilm assay were only partially explained by changes in CFU values and polysaccharide amounts in the biofilms. Both xylitol and erythritol inhibited real-time biofilm formation by all the nine tested S. mutans strains. Sensitivity of the strains to inhibition varied: some were more sensitive to xylitol and some to erythritol. Xylitol also modified the expression levels of gbpB, gtfB, gtfC and gtfD genes that are important in polysaccharide-mediated adherence of S. mutans.

Conclusion

The erythritol- and xylitol- induced inhibition of biofilm formation was only partly explained by decrease in the number of viable S. mutans cells or the amount of polysaccharides in the biofilm matrix, suggesting that in addition to reduced proliferation also the matrix composition and thereby the surface attachment quality of biofilm matrix may be altered by the polyols.

Background

Dental caries results from microbiome dysbiosis involving multiple cariogenic bacterial species, including Streptococcus mutans and S. sobrinus (mutans streptococci, MS [1, 2];). The relevancy of MS in the etiology of dental caries has been questioned [3]. MS have, however, key pathogenic properties as prominent extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) matrix producers, and as acidogenic and aciduric organisms [1,2,3,4]. Extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) in dental plaque could predict caries development in children [5]. In addition, high levels of MS in the dentition appears also to be one of the strongest risk indicators associated with early childhood caries [6, 7].

Xylitol and erythritol are five- and four-carbon polyol sweeteners, respectively, that appear to have specific, beneficial effects on oral health [8,9,10,11]. Earliest studies of xylitol inhibition of MS are reported already at 1975 [12], but erythritol has only recently become a subject of wider interest [11]. Habitual consumption of xylitol is suggested to reduce caries occurrence, plaque amount and levels of MS [8,9,10]. Habitual, long-term xylitol consumers are also reported to have low levels of dental plaque compared to non-consumers of xylitol [13]. It has been suggested that “xylitol-plaque” is less adhesive due to a decrease in counts of plaque mutans streptococci and the amount of insoluble polysaccharides in plaque [9, 14]. Erythritol has been suggested to outshine xylitol with regard to oral health benefits [11]. There are, however, only a few clinical studies evaluating the effects of erythritol on oral health-related variables. Erythritol appears to decrease plaque amount, but the effects on MS levels are controversial [15,16,17].

In spite of the abundant research published, the mechanism of the plaque-decreasing effect of xylitol is not fully understood. The decrease in plaque MS counts is often attributed to growth inhibition, but also to an extracellular polysaccharide-mediated decrease in plaque adhesiveness [9]. To explore the mechanisms of xylitol inhibition of biofilms, several in vitro studies are conducted, but the results are contradictory, both inhibition [18,19,20,21] or no effect on MS in biofilm has been reported [18, 22,23,24]. Two studies on effects of erythritol on S. mutans biofilm formation on polystyrene microtiter plates were identified, both showing inhibition on total amount of biofilm formed by S. mutans [20, 25].

Comparison of the in vitro studies is difficult because different bacterial strains and conditions are used and different parameters, e.g. number of bacteria, total biomass of biofilm, amount of EPS, measured. Moreover, the used biofilm set-ups are mostly end-point measurements and obtained information is thus limited to the selected biofilm stage. Biofilm growth, however, is a dynamic time-dependent process with time-specific characteristics. It has been, for example, suggested that xylitol reduces the number of viable S. mutans bacteria in the early stages but not in mature biofilm [19].

In this study we aimed to follow the effects of xylitol on the dynamics of biofilm formation by different strains of S. mutans using an impedance spectroscopy instrument, xCELLigence Real Time Cell Analyzer (RTCA) from Acea Biosciences, that allows label-free, non-invasive real-time monitoring of biofilm formation [26, 27]. Based on the obtained information of biofilm dynamics, we assessed the number of viable bacteria, the polysaccharide content, and the expression levels of genes involved in glucan mediated biofilm formation in different biofilm stages of selected strains. Comparative studies of the effects of xylitol and erythritol on S. mutans biofilms are almost non-existent [20, 28] thus, we also explored the effects of erythritol on S. mutans biofilm dynamics.

Results

Biofilm formation

In preliminary experiments different concentrations of xylitol and erythritol (1, 2, 5%) were tested. Dose-dependent reduction in the CI was observed in xylitol-supplemented BHI-sucrose medium (Fig. 1a and b). The biofilm formation of the reference strain NCTC 10449 was inhibited even with 1% xylitol while the inhibition of biofilm formation of the strain 2366 required 5% of xylitol. Similar results were seen with erythritol (Fig. 1c and d). The biofilm formation appeared to reach maximum CI-values between 10 and 12 h. For the strain 2366 the tested polyols reduced the rate of biofilm formation, but did not affect the total biomass of formed biofilm, as measured by RTCA (Fig. 1b and d). For the strain NCTC 10449, instead, the total biomass of formed biofilm was significantly reduced by the presence of both xylitol and erythritol (Fig. 1a and c). Based on these results, 5% xylitol and erythritol were selected for tests with further strains.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Real-time biofilm formation of (a) S. mutans NCTC 10449 and (b) clinical isolate 2366 in BHI-sucrose medium or medium supplemented with 1, 2% or 5% xylitol and (c) S. mutans NCTC 10449 and (d) clinical isolate 2366 in BHI-sucrose medium or medium supplemented with 1, 2% or 5% erythritol. Bacteria were let to adhere on E-plate surface for 2 h, after which xylitol was added in the medium. dCI = cell index value change after addition of xylitol, see text for details. Mean ± SD, n = 4

Full size image

The effect of the polyols on the biofilm formation of nine different S. mutans strains were tested, three reference strains S. mutans NCTC 10449, S. mutans NG8 and S. mutans Ingbritt as well as six clinical isolates (Fig. 2). All tested strains were inhibited by the polyols but the sensitivity varied significantly between strains, some were more susceptible for xylitol, some for erythritol while for some the effects of the polyols were almost indistinguishable. For all strains and for both polyols the inhibition was most evident at early stage of biofilm formation. (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Real-time biofilm formation of different S. mutans strains in the BHI-sucrose medium (suc) or medium supplemented with 5% xylitol (xyl) or 5% erythritol (ery). aS. mutans NCTC10449 bS. mutans NG8 cS. mutans Ingbritt dS. mutans 2366 eS. mutans 195-s2 fS. mutans 199-s6 gS. mutans 124-s7 hS. mutans 113-s12 iS. mutans 117-s3. Bacteria were let to adhere on E-plate surface for 2 h, after which xylitol was added in the medium. dCI = cell index value change after addition of xylitol, see text for details. Mean ± SD, n = 2–4

Full size image

To get information of the parameters responsible of measured differences in biofilm formation, S. mutans NCTC 10449 and CI2366 biofilms were analysed in more detail. Viable bacteria, amount of extracellular carbohydrates in the biofilm and the expression of gbpB- and gtf -genes were measured at different time points.

Colony forming units

The number of viable bacteria in the biofilm formed under polyol exposure was reduced in the early phases of the biofilm formation by both tested strains (Fig. 3c and d). The presence of xylitol inhibited the growth of S. mutans NCTC 10449 more than erythritol, especially at seven-hour time point (p = 0.016, Fig. 3c). However, no difference was noted in the biofilm viability at ten-hour time point even though the amount of formed biofilm was significantly reduced by erythritol and xylitol.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Formation rate and composition analysis of biofilms made by S. mutans NCTC 10449 (a, c, e) and clinical isolate 2366 (b, d, f) in BHI-sucrose medium (suc), and BHI-sucrose medium supplemented with eryhtritol (ery) or xylitol (xyl). a and b: Biofilm formation as measured in xCELLigence, the erythritol and xylitol curves significantly differed from sucrose in all time points, the line indicates the time period where there is a significant difference (p < 0.05) between erythritol and xylitol, c and d: Biofilm samples were collected at indicated time points and number of living bacteria were determined by plate counting, d and e: Amount of polysaccharides in the biofilm at different time points as measured by Anthrone method from collected biofilm samples. * significant difference (p < 0.05) between sucrose and xylitol, #significant difference (p < 0.05) between sucrose and erythritol, osignificant difference (p < 0.05) between erythritol and xylitol, **/##/oop < 0.01, ***/###/ooop < 0.001

Full size image

Polysaccharide formation

To compare the extracellular polysaccharide matrix of the biofilms, we next measured the total amount of carbohydrates at different time points. The carbohydrate amount increased during time, as expected, and correlated well with the measured biofilm formation/CI values in E-plate when bacteria were grown in BHI-sucrose (Fig. 3a-b, and e-f).

At the seven-hour time point, the presence of polyols reduced the amount of measurable carbohydrates in biofilms formed by both tested S. mutans strains, when compared to biofilm formed in control BHI-sucrose medium without polyols. In the ten-hour samples, especially biofilms formed by S. mutans NCTC 10449 in xylitol or erythritol supplemented medium still contained significantly less carbohydrates than those formed in BHI-sucrose medium. This is in accordance to measured CI values of the biofilms, where the effect of polyols on the biofilm formation by strain NCTC 10449 was more pronounced than on biofilm formation by strain 2366 (Fig. 3a-b and e-f). No difference could be seen between erythritol and xylitol biofilms in polysaccharide formation.

Gene expression

The expression levels of gbpB, encoding glucan binding protein B, an important mediator in sucrose-dependent biofilm formation [29], and three glucosyltransferase genes, gtfB, gtfC and gtfD, coding the enzymes responsible for extracellular polysaccharide synthesis, were evaluated. The strain 2366 and biofilms formed in control and xylitol supplemented medium were selected for this assay, because previous studies have shown that xylitol inhibits the growth and polysaccharide-mediated adhesion of strain 2366 more efficiently than that of the reference strain [18, 28, 30].

The overall yield of RNA extracted from xylitol biofilms at both the seven- and ten-hour time points were lower than that obtained from control biofilms. The RNA yields for the xylitol-treated biofilms were 24.5 ± 12.5 ng (7 h) and 752.2 ± 339.5 ng (10 h) and for the control biofilms 259.6 ± 212.3 ng (7 h) and 1298.9 ± 304.1 ng (10 h). This could partly be explained by lower number of bacteria present in the xylitol biofilm at the seven-hour time point, but at the ten-hour time point equal numbers of viable bacteria were present in both biofilms.

No effect of xylitol supplementation was seen on the expression level of gbpB nor the three glucosyltransferase genes, gtfB, gtfC and gtfD in the seven-hour biofilms but the expression of all of them was significantly upregulated in the ten-hour xylitol biofilms (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Expression of genes involved in glucose mediated adhesion and extra cellular polysaccharide formation in S. mutans 2366 biofilms at two different time points. a: 7 h, b: 10 h. Expression is depicted as fold change in gene expression in xylitol-biofilm in relation to biofilm formed in unsupplemented BHI-sucrose medium. * p < 0.0125

Full size image

Discussion

Our results showed that both xylitol and erythritol inhibited real-time biofilm formation of the used S. mutans strains in the presence of 1% sucrose, but the sensitivity of the strains to polyols differed. The polyol-induced inhibition of the real-time biofilm formation was only partly explained by a decrease in the number of viable S. mutans cells or the amount of polysaccharides in the biofilms.

When polysaccharide production is one target of the study, addition of sucrose to the medium is essential. In the real-time biofilm monitoring method we used, S. mutans biofilm formation is significantly increased by sucrose in the medium, 1% being superior to 0.2% [26]. Thus, we chose to include 1% sucrose in the medium. In some cases sucrose added to the medium is reported to abolish polyol inhibition observed without added sucrose [18], but by the assay used in the present study polyol-induced inhibition in the biofilm formation could be seen for all tested strains even in the presence of sucrose.

In the literature the xylitol-induced effects on biofilm formation have shown big variation e.g. [18, 19, 21, 24, 28]. This may reflect for different experimental conditions and different bacterial strains used. Different strains have different sensitivity to xylitol and erythritol as evidenced in the present study, and also in earlier studies [18, 19, 28]. Some strains were more sensitive to xylitol and some more sensitive to erythritol, and there were also strains where the effect of polyols was almost identical. For all strains, the inhibitory effect of the polyols on the S. mutans biofilm growth was more pronounced in the early stages of biofilm formation and less significant at later stages. The long incubation time in the biofilm experiment may explain why, for example, Giertsen et al. [24] found no effects for repeated exposures with 7.5% xylitol in a 64.5-h-old mixed-six-species biofilm.

We could see a reduction in the number of viable bacteria in the early time point biofilms formed under both xylitol and erythritol exposure, but not in any biofilms at the ten-hour time point. Also in our earlier end-point biofilm experiment 5% xylitol inhibited S. mutans counts in biofilm only when the biofilm was young, 8 h old, but not at 24 h [19]. Both erythritol and xylitol inhibit the growth of planktonic S. mutans cells [16, 28, 30]. Interestingly, xylitol reduced the number of S. mutans NCTC 10449 bacteria in the biofilm more efficiently than erythritol, even though both polyols inhibit the planktonic growth of the strain equally well [16, 28]. The mechanism of erythritol inhibition is not known, but xylitol inhibits the growth of S. mutans via a futile xylitol-5-phosphate cycle. The inhibition is related to the PEP:PTS activity, resulting in ‘starvation’ of the cells [31]. At the ten-hour time point we noted markedly lower amounts of RNA isolated from bacteria growing in biofilms exposed to xylitol compared to RNA from similar numbers of live bacteria from control biofilms, which may reflect the xylitol-induced ‘starvation’ of the bacteria in the xylitol biofilm. Our results thus suggest that growth inhibition may contribute to biofilm inhibition at the early stages, and even though the number of viable bacteria is not reduced in later stages, their protein synthesis may be impaired.

In a clinical study, habitual exposure of plaque to xylitol decreased insoluble polysaccharides in the plaque [14]. In our in vitro model both polyols affected equally to the dynamics of the polysaccharide accumulation in the biofilm matrix of the two analysed strains. In all biofilms the biofilm amount increased up to 10–12 h. The fastest accumulation occurred between five and seven hours in the absence of the polyols while in polyol biofilms the fastest accumulation typically started 1–3 h later. Polysaccharide-mediated adhesion is an important step for the subsequent formation of mature biofilm. This process involves bacterial surface proteins, e.g. glucan binding proteins that attach to polysaccharides in the biofilm matrix, synthesized mainly by the three glucosyltransferases, GtfB, GtfC and GtfD. We therefore measured the expression levels of gbpB and gtf -genes in the strain 2366 in the presence and in the absence of xylitol. In the seven-hour samples, no difference was seen between control and xylitol biofilms in relative expression levels of gbpB- or gtf-genes. The reduced amount of measured polysaccharides in the seven-hour biofilm may reflect lower numbers of viable bacteria in the biofilm, but it is also possible that xylitol- induced starvation reduced the total protein synthesis of bacteria, not seen in qPCR which measures only the relative expression of genes. The increased gtf- gene expression levels seen in the ten-hour xylitol biofilms is reflected also as higher polysaccharide accumulation in xylitol biofilms compared to control biofilms during later stages of biofilm. To our knowledge, the effect of xylitol on gbpB- or gtf -gene expression in the presence of sucrose has not been studied before. Decker et al. studied S. mutans biofilms exposed to 1% xylitol in medium containing glucose and found upregulation of gtfB, gtfC and gtfD in 24-h biofilm, suggesting that the metabolic imbalance caused by xylitol was counteracted at the gene expression level [22]. This is in line with our results showing that effects of xylitol on gtf- gene expression was noted only in later stages of biofilm formation. Also, Shemesh et al. showed with planktonic S. mutans GS5 cells that xylitol increased the expression of gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD only in the late exponential growth phase in tryptone-yeast extract medium [32].

Our earlier study with an end-point biofilm model suggested that the biofilm inhibition was based on growth inhibition since the biofilms formed by the xylitol-sensitive S. mutans strains were inhibited by xylitol but those of xylitol-resistant strains not [19]. The results of the present study suggest that while growth inhibition may contribute to the early stages of biofilm inhibition found for both xylitol and erythritol, generally a decrease in the polysaccharide synthesis may best explain the decrease in the biofilm formation in association with these polyols. However, the lower signals of biofilm formed by strain NCTC 10449 in the presence of xylitol compared to erythritol, measured in the real-time biofilm assay, cannot be explained by the CFU-values or total polysaccharide contents, since they were similar for both polyols. The changes in impedance, or CI, measured by xCELLigence system is dependent not only on the number of attached cells or the amount of biofilm but, according to the manufacturer, also on the attachment quality of the substances on the surface of the E-plate [33]. It can thus be that also the composition, and thereby the structure and attachment strength, of the biofilm matrix is affected by the polyols, and these effects differ between xylitol and erythritol. Furthermore, the xylitol/erythritol-associated plaque reductions seen in clinical studies [8, 9, 17] may reflect a change in tightness of the biofilm attachment.

Recently, studies have suggested that antimicrobial complexes of zinc and sugar alcohols could penetrate S. mutans biofilms [34, 35]. In these experiments the erythritol-zinc-complex had a higher bactericidal activity compared to xylitol-zinc [34]. The same group showed also that erythritol and xylitol had a similar synergistic effect with betaine, a twitter ion, in detachment of S. mutans biofilms [35]. These results indicate that xylitol and erythritol may have far wider biofilm-related applications than only being biofilm formation inhibitors.

Conclusion

Our results show that both xylitol and erythritol inhibited real-time biofilm formation by different strains of S. mutans. Sensitivity of the strains to polyols varied markedly, and some strains were more sensitive to xylitol and some to erythritol. Possibility to follow biofilm formation in real-time provided novel information of the effects of the polyols on the dynamics of biofilm formation. Impedance measurement also showed reduced total amount of measured biofilm for some strains. The inhibition of biofilm formation was only partly explained by a decrease in the number of viable S. mutans cells or the amount of polysaccharides in the biofilms, suggesting that not only was the proliferation rate of the biofilm decreased, but also the tightness of its attachment may be altered by the polyols.

Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Strains of Streptococcus mutans used: type strains NCTC 10449, NG8 and Ingbritt and the clinical isolates 113-s12, 117-s3, 124-s7, 195-s2, 199-s6, and 2366 [28]. For the biofilm assays the bacteria were grown overnight in Brain Heart Infusion Broth (BHI, Becton Dickinson, France) at 37 °C. On the day of the experiments, overnight grown bacteria were diluted 1:10 to fresh BHI and grown to mid log-phase (OD550 = 0.5). The log-phase bacteria were further diluted 1:50 in BHI containing 1% (w/v) sucrose (BHI-sucrose) and used for biofilm assays.

Biofilm formation

Real-time biofilm assay was performed with an xCELLigence RTCA DP instrument (ACEA Biosciences Inc., CA, USA, [26, 36]) where biofilm forming bacteria attach to electrode sensor surface of the well in a 16 well electronic microtiter plate (E-plate). This attachment alters the measured impedance. Cell-sensor impedance is expressed as an arbitrary unit called cell index (CI). The magnitude of the change in the impedance is dependent on the number of attached cells, the size of the cells and the quantity and quality of the cell substrate e.g. biofilm matrix.

In order to study the effect of the xylitol and erythritol on biofilm formation by S. mutans different amounts of the two polyols were added in the growth medium and the biofilm formation was followed. First, BHI-sucrose medium (50 μl) was added to each well of 16-well E-Plate (ACEA Biosciences Inc) for background measurement, and 100 μl of cell- BHI-sucrose suspension was added. The plates were connected to the RTCA DP-system placed in CO2 incubator at 37 °C, and biofilm formation followed at 15-min intervals. After 1 h incubation, the run was paused and 50 μl of BHI-sucrose or BHI-sucrose supplemented with 4, 8% or 20% (w/v) xylitol (Sigma Aldrich, USA) or erythritol (Sigma Aldrich) was added and biofilm formation was again followed at 15 min intervals. Addition of medium with erythritol/xylitol induced a rapid increase in impedance signal in RTCA that slowly settled to slightly higher level compared to levels of BHI-sucrose signal. To be able to compare results obtained in different medium, the analysis program of the RTCA DP instrument (RTCA software 2.0.0.1301) was used to set the CI value at 2.5 h as one in all wells, and the results are expressed as delta CI, i.e. CI change compared to the CI at 2.5 h time point. Based on the preliminary test with different amounts of xylitol/erythritol, 20% (final concentration 5%) was selected for further assays. Biofilm tests were run in four to eight replicates and experiments repeated at least twice.

Biofilm characterization

Biofilm formation was followed in real-time in three parallel E-plates in the RTCA equipment. At indicated time points, the run was paused and one plate per time point was removed and used either to quantify the number of viable bacteria, the amount total carbohydrate or to evaluate the expression of gbpB, gtfB, gtfC, gtfD genes in biofilm. The formation of the biofilm in the other plates was further followed.

Colony forming units

Counts of viable S. mutans NCTC 10449 and 2366 cells were determined at 3, 5, 7 and 10 h biofilms. All the culture medium was carefully removed from the wells, the remaining biofilm was washed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2) after which 100 μl of PBS was added in the well and the biofilm was detached using micro brush (Quick-Stick, Dentsol AB, Sweden) as previously described [19]. Both the micro brush and PBS were transferred to a tube containing 0.9 ml tryptic soy broth (Becton Dickinson) with 10% glycerol. Transport tubes were stored at − 20 °C before analysis. For culturing the tubes were thawed, mixed and mildly sonicated. Serial dilutions were made in saline, plated to mitis salivarius agar plates (Becton Dickinson) which were incubated 2–3 days in 7% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C. The results were expressed as log CFU (colony forming units)/ml. Samples were run in triplicates.

Polysaccharide analysis

Total polysaccharide amount in the biofilms, formed by S. mutans NCTC 10449 or the clinical isolate 2366, were measured at 5, 7 and 10 h by Anthrone method [37, 38] with some modifications. Briefly, the biofilm was washed twice with PBS and suspended to 100 μl of PBS with the micro bruches (Quick-Stick), as described above. Equal volume of 0.8 M NaOH was added in the biofilm suspension, mixed carefully and centrifuged 10,000 g, 10 min. The supernatant was diluted 1:5 with distilled water and used for analysis. An aliquot of 100 μl of the sample was mixed with 300 μl anthrone-sulfuric acid reagent (10 mg of Anthrone per 10 ml of sulfuric acid) on ice. After 10-min incubation on ice samples were boiled for 20 min and absorbance at 620 nm was measured after samples were cooled to room temperature (20–22 °C). Obtained absorbance was compared to standard curve derived from samples with known amount of dextrose. Polysaccharides were measured from 5 to 6 replicates and the amount of the carbohydrates in the biofilm suspension (μg/ml) were calculated.

Gene expression

The gene expression in the xylitol and control biofilms of clinical isolate 2366 was evaluated at seven and 10 h. Medium was removed from the wells and the biofilms were briefly rinsed twice with warm PBS, and micro brushes (Quick-Stick) were used to suspend the biofilm in 200 μl of RNAprotect Bacteria Reagent (Qiagen, Germany) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Samples were stored at − 70 °C before processing as described previously [39].

In short, total RNA of the samples was extracted by beating with 0.1 mm glass beads (BioSpec products, OK, USA) followed by RNA purification using the Genejet RNA kit (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). The contamination of genomic DNA was removed using the TURBO DNA-free Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA). cDNA was synthesized with a RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). The expression of gbpB, gtfB, gtfC, and gtfD was examined with gene-specific PCR primers using SYBR-green based quantitative PCR (qPCR) in a Lightcycler 480II (Roche Diagnostics Nederland B.V. The Netherlands). The sequences and annealing temperature of the primers are listed in Table 1. The relative expression of each target genes was normalized by the expression of two housekeeping genes, recA and gyrA, and calculated as 2-(∆Ct), where ∆Ct = Cttarget gene-Ctgeomean of housekeeping genes). Fold changes in gene expression were further determined by 2-(∆∆Ct), where ∆∆Ct = ∆Ct of sample with xylitol-average ∆Ct of samples without xylitol [40].

Table 1 Primers used in this study
Full size table

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, Version 24). The student’s t-test was performed to determine the statistical significance of the differences between sucrose, xylitol and erythritol biofilms and differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. The gene expression data were log2 transformed prior to analysis. Student’s t-test was used to compare the fold change of each target gene in the xylitol group to the group without given xylitol at each time point. The fold change of 4 genes was compared. Therefore, the significance level (α) for Student’s t-test was adjusted to 0.0125 according to the Bonferroni correction. This, in gene expression data analysis differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.0125.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

BHI:

Brain heart infusion broth

CI:

Cell index

EPS:

Extracellular polysaccharide

MS:

Mutans streptococci

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

RTCA:

Real time cell analyzer

References

  1. Gross EL, Beall CJ, Kutsch SR, Firestone ND, Leys EJ, Griffen AL. Beyond Streptococcus mutans: dental caries onset linked to multiple species by 16S rRNA community analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e47722.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanner ACR, Kressirer CA, Rothmiller S, Johansson I, Chalmers NI. The caries microbiome: implications for reversing dysbiosis. Adv Dent Res. 2018;29:78–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Banas JA, Drake DR. Are the mutans streptococci still considered relevant to understanding the microbial etiology of dental caries? BMC Oral Health. 2018;18:129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lamont RJ, Koo H, Hajishengallis G. The oral microbiota: dynamic communities and host interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:745–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parisotto TM, Stipp R, Rodrigues LK, Mattos-Graner RO, Costa LS, Nobre-Dos-Santos M. Can insoluble polysaccharide concentration in dental plaque, sugar exposure and cariogenic microorganisms predict early childhood caries? A follow-up study. Arch Oral Biol. 2015;60:1091–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirthiga M, Murugan M, Saikia A, Kirubakaran R. Risk factors for early childhood caries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case control and cohort studies. Pediatr Dent. 2019;41:95–112.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hughes CV, Dahlan M, Papadopolou E, Loo CY, Pradhan NS, Lu SC, Mathney JM, Bravoco A, Kent RL Jr, Tanner AC. Aciduric microbiota and mutans streptococci in severe and recurrent severe early childhood caries. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34:e16–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maguire A, Rugg-Gunn AJ. Xylitol and caries prevention--is it a magic bullet? Br Dent J. 2003;194:429–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soderling EM. Xylitol, mutans streptococci, and dental plaque. Adv Dent Res. 2009;21:74–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhan L. Rebalancing the caries microbiome dysbiosis: targeted treatment and sugar alcohols. Adv Dent Res. 2018;29:110–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. de Cock P, Makinen K, Honkala E, Saag M, Kennepohl E, Eapen A. Erythritol is more effective than xylitol and sorbitol in managing Oral health endpoints. Int J Dent. 2016;2016:9868421.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Knuuttila ML, Makinen K. Effect of xylitol on the growth and metabolism of Streptococcus mutans. Caries Res. 1975;9:177–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Soderling E, Isokangas P, Tenovuo J, Mustakallio S, Makinen KK. Long-term xylitol consumption and mutans streptococci in plaque and saliva. Caries Res. 1991;25:153–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Makinen KK, Soderling E, Hurttia H, Lehtonen OP, Luukkala E. Biochemical, microbiologic, and clinical comparisons between two dentifrices that contain different mixtures of sugar alcohols. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985;111:745–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Makinen KK, Isotupa KP, Kivilompolo T, Makinen PL, Toivanen J, Soderling E. Comparison of erythritol and xylitol saliva stimulants in the control of dental plaque and mutans streptococci. Caries Res. 2001;35:129–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Makinen KK, Saag M, Isotupa KP, Olak J, Nommela R, Soderling E, Makinen PL. Similarity of the effects of erythritol and xylitol on some risk factors of dental caries. Caries Res. 2005;39:207–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Runnel R, Makinen KK, Honkala S, Olak J, Makinen PL, Nommela R, Vahlberg T, Honkala E, Saag M. Effect of three-year consumption of erythritol, xylitol and sorbitol candies on various plaque and salivary caries-related variables. J Dent. 2013;41:1236–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Salli KM, Forssten SD, Lahtinen SJ, Ouwehand AC. Influence of sucrose and xylitol on an early Streptococcus mutans biofilm in a dental simulator. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;70:39–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marttinen AM, Ruas-Madiedo P, Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Saari MA, Ihalin RA, Soderling EM. Effects of xylitol on xylitol-sensitive versus xylitol-resistant Streptococcus mutans strains in a three-species in vitro biofilm. Curr Microbiol. 2012;65:237–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghezelbash GL, Khorasgani MR. Comparative inhibitory effect of xylitol and Erythritol on the growth and biofilm formation of Oral Streptococci. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2012;6:4404–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Badet C, Furiga A, Thebaud N. Effect of xylitol on an in vitro model of oral biofilm. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2008;6:337–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Decker EM, Klein C, Schwindt D, von Ohle C. Metabolic activity of Streptococcus mutans biofilms and gene expression during exposure to xylitol and sucrose. Int J Oral Sci. 2014;6:195–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Brambilla E, Ionescu AC, Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Samaranayake LP. Levorotatory carbohydrates and xylitol subdue Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans adhesion and biofilm formation. J Basic Microbiol. 2016;56:480–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Giertsen E, Arthur RA, Guggenheim B. Effects of xylitol on survival of mutans streptococci in mixed-six-species in vitro biofilms modelling supragingival plaque. Caries Res. 2011;45:31–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saran S, Mukherjee S, Dalal J, Saxena RK. High production of erythritol from Candida sorbosivorans SSE-24 and its inhibitory effect on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. Bioresour Technol. 2015;198:31–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gutierrez D, Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Rodriguez A, Garcia P, Ruas-Madiedo P. Monitoring in real time the formation and removal of biofilms from clinical related pathogens using an impedance-based technology. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Muras A, Mayer C, Romero M, Camino T, Ferrer MD, Mira A, Otero A. Inhibition of Steptococcus mutans biofilm formation by extracts of Tenacibaculum sp. 20J, a bacterium with wide-spectrum quorum quenching activity. J Oral Microbiol. 2018;10:1429788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Soderling EM, Hietala-Lenkkeri AM. Xylitol and erythritol decrease adherence of polysaccharide-producing oral streptococci. Curr Microbiol. 2010;60:25–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Duque C, Stipp RN, Wang B, Smith DJ, Hofling JF, Kuramitsu HK, Duncan MJ, Mattos-Graner RO. Downregulation of GbpB, a component of the VicRK regulon, affects biofilm formation and cell surface characteristics of Streptococcus mutans. Infect Immun. 2011;79:786–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Soderling EM, Ekman TC, Taipale TJ. Growth inhibition of Streptococcus mutans with low xylitol concentrations. Curr Microbiol. 2008;56:382–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Miyasawa-Hori H, Aizawa S, Takahashi N. Difference in the xylitol sensitivity of acid production among Streptococcus mutans strains and the biochemical mechanism. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2006;21:201–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shemesh M, Tam A, Feldman M, Steinberg D. Differential expression profiles of Streptococcus mutans ftf, gtf and vicR genes in the presence of dietary carbohydrates at early and late exponential growth phases. Carbohydr Res. 2006;341:2090–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ferrer MD, Lamarche B, Mira A. Studying bacterial bioiflms using cellular impedance. https://www.aceabio.com/wp-content/uploads/xCELLigenceAppNoteBioFilmSept.pdf.2017. Accessed 8 Apr 2020.

  34. Lim JH, Jeong Y, Song SH, Ahn JH, Lee JR, Lee SM. Penetration of an antimicrobial zinc-sugar alcohol complex into Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Sci Rep. 2018;8:16154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lim JH, Song SH, Park HS, Lee JR, Lee SM. Spontaneous detachment of Streptococcus mutans biofilm by synergistic effect between zwitterion and sugar alcohol. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ferrer MD, Mira A. Oral biofilm architecture at the microbial scale. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:246–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang X, Zhang K, Deng M, Exterkate RAM, Liu C, Zhou X, Cheng L, Ten Cate JM. Effect of arginine on the growth and biofilm formation of oral bacteria. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;82:256–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Scott T, Melvin E. Determination of dextran with Anthrone. Anal Chem. 1953;25:1656–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Liao Y, Chen J, Brandt BW, Zhu Y, Li J, van Loveren C, Deng DM. Identification and functional analysis of genome mutations in a fluoride-resistant Streptococcus mutans strain. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0122630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Excellent technical assistance of Biomedical research technician Oona Hällfors is gratefully acknowledged.

Funding

This work was supported by Minerva Foundation and Turku University Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Lemminkäisenkatu 2, 20520, Turku, Finland

    Vuokko Loimaranta & Eva Söderling

  2. Department of Preventive Dentistry, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands

    Danuta Mazurel & Dongmei Deng

Authors
  1. Vuokko Loimaranta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danuta Mazurel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dongmei Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eva Söderling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

VL and ES designed the study, supervised and performed the microbiological experiments, and were responsible for results analysis and interpretation of the data. MD and DD designed and performed the gene expression studies, and their analysis. All authors read, amended and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vuokko Loimaranta.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loimaranta, V., Mazurel, D., Deng, D. et al. Xylitol and erythritol inhibit real-time biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. BMC Microbiol 20, 184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01867-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-020-01867-8

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us