Skip to main content
Download PDF

Variations of bacterial community during the decomposition of Microcystis under different temperatures and biomass

BMC Microbiology volume 19, Article number: 207 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The decomposition of Microcystis can dramatically change the physicochemical properties of freshwater ecosystems. Bacteria play an important role in decomposing organic matters and accelerating the cycling of materials within freshwater lakes. However, actions of the bacterial community are greatly influenced by temperature and the amount of organic matter available to decompose during a bloom. Therefore, it is vital to understand how different temperatures and biomass levels affect the bacterial community during the decomposition of Microcystis.

Results

Microcystis addition reduced the diversity of bacterial community. The composition of bacterial community differed markedly between samples with different biomass of Microcystis (no addition, low biomass addition: 0.17 g/L, and high biomass addition: 0.33 g/L). In contrast, temperature factor did not contribute much to the different bacterial community composition. Total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total organic carbon (TOC), ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N) and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) were the key measured environmental variables shaping the composition of bacterial community.

Conclusions

Decomposition of Microcystis changed the physicochemical characteristics of the water and controlled the diversity and composition of the bacterial community. Microcystis biomass rather than temperature was the dominant factor affecting the diversity and composition of the bacterial community.

Background

With increased anthropogenic pressure within watersheds, eutrophication has become one of the most serious environmental problems facing Chinese freshwater lakes [1]. Microcystis blooms, affiliated to Cyanobacteria, are common in eutrophic freshwater lakes and harmful to human health [2, 3]. Bacteria are a key component of aquatic ecosystems and play important roles in decomposing of organic matters derived from phytoplankton [4, 5]. Bacterial communities associated with the growth of bloom-forming freshwater phytoplankton have received considerable attentions [5, 6]. However, relatively few studies have assessed the response of freshwater bacterial communities to the decomposition of Microcystis. The bacteria-Microcystis relationship has important implications in aquatic ecosystems.

Previous studies have reported obvious changes in environmental variables as well as bacterial communities due to the decomposition of Microcystis [7,8,9]. The release of dissolved organic matter (DOM) by bloom-forming Microcystis is a ubiquitous process in eutrophic freshwater lakes [10]. The rapid depletion of dissolved oxygen was always associated with bloom decomposition [11]. Li et al. [7] observed spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the composition of both planktonic and particle-attached bacterial communities in an anoxic zone of Lake Taihu, the anoxia being caused by Microcystis decomposition. Zhao et al. [8] constructed microcosms to characterize the bacterial community composition in water and sediment during Microcystis decomposition and found that marked changes of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and pH might be responsible for variations in bacterial communities. Temperature is an important factor driving the growth and metabolism of microorganisms. Xing et al. [9] simulated the degradation of Microcystis in anoxic water columns and found that temperature had a great influence on the bacterial community composition. Therefore, both temperature and Microcystis biomass are key factors influencing the microbial communities during Microcystis degradation.

Here, we took both Microcystis biomass and temperature into account to understand how the Microcystis decomposition affected the bacterial community. We constructed microcosms containing different amounts of Microcystis biomass and incubated under different temperatures. Water samples were collected at the time point of intense Microcystis decomposition. Water characteristics were examined and the 454 pyrosequencing was used to investigate the diversity and composition of the bacterial community in water samples. Our study aimed to (1) understand how Microcystis decomposition affected the diversity and composition of bacterial community; (2) determine whether temperature or Microcystis biomass was the dominant factor controlling freshwater bacterial communities during Microcystis decomposition.

Results

Environmental variables during the decomposition of Microcystis

Physicochemical properties in water samples of different treatments were shown in Fig. 1. Marked changes were observed for the treatments with highest Microcystis biomass addition (H treatment). Overall, significant higher concentrations of TOC, TN, TP, NH4+-N and NO2−-N were observed in the treatments with Microcystis addition (H and L treatments) compared with the control treatment (without Microcystis addition). The DO and ORP decreased significantly in high Microcystis biomass addition (H) treatment. In contrast, little difference was found for the measured environmental variables between different temperature treatments (15 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C) (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Environmental variables of different Microcystis addition treatments. TOC, total organic carbon; DO, dissolved oxygen; ORP, oxidation-reduction potential; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; NH4+-N, ammonia nitrogen; NO3−-N, nitrate nitrogen; NO2−-N, nitrite nitrogen. C, without addition of Microcystis; L, low Microcystis biomass treatment; H, high Microcystis biomass treatment. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (Duncan’s multiple range test, P < 0.05)

Full size image

Diversity and composition of the bacterial community within the different treatments

Two different diversity indices (Shannon-Wiener index and Faith’s PD) were used to quantify the diversity of bacterial community of different treatments (C, L, H; 15 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C). Both indices showed the same pattern. In Fig. 2a and b, significant decrease in the bacterial community of H treatment was found (P < 0.05), whereas no significant difference was observed in the bacterial community of the C and L treatments. In Fig. 2c and d, diversity of bacterial community did not differ significantly for different temperature treatments (P > 0.05).

Fig. 2
figure2

Alpha diversity of bacterial communities from different treatments. a, b: groups divided by Microcystis biomass; c, d: groups divided by temperature. Shannon, Shannon-Weiner index; Faith’s PD, the Faith’s phylogenetic diversity. C, without addition of Microcystis; L, low Microcystis biomass treatment; H, High Microcystis biomass treatment. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (Duncan’s multiple range test, P < 0.05)

Full size image

Based on the Bray-Curtis and unweighted UniFrac distance, non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was performed to characterize the dissimilarity of bacterial community composition of the water samples. The bacterial community composition of the C, L and H treatments were grouped into three distinct clusters based on the Bray-Curtis distance (Fig. 3a). However, the bacterial community composition of the C and L groups was not clearly separated based on the unweighted UniFrac distance (Fig. 3b). The dissimilarity of the bacterial community composition of the H treatment group (0.66 ± 0.03) was significant higher than those of the C (0.62 ± 0.03) and L (0.62 ± 0.02) treatment groups (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3c). The results of permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) showed significant differences in the composition of the bacterial communities of the C and H (P < 0.01) as well as the L and H groups (P < 0.01) (Table 1). In contrast, temperature only maintained little effects on controlling the bacterial community composition (Table 1).

Fig. 3
figure3

Dissimilarity of bacterial communities based on phylogenetic distance. a, c: based on Bray-Curtis distance; b: based on unweighted UniFrac distance. C, without Microcystis addition; L, low Microcystis biomass treatment; H, High Microcystis biomass treatment. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences (Duncan’s multiple range test, P < 0.05)

Full size image
Table 1 Results of permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) between different treatment groups
Full size table

Taxonomic features of bacterial communities during Microcystis decomposition

The relative abundance at the phylum level calculated from the obtained bacterial sequences was presented in Additional file 2: Table S1. On average, Betaproteobacteria (52.98%), Bacteroidetes (10.96%), and Gammaproteobacteria (9.34%) were the dominant phyla, followed by Alphaproteobacteria (7.50%), Firmicutes (7.23%), Actinobacteria (5.51%), Planctomycetes (1.36%), Parcubacteria (1.27%) and Verrucomicrobia (1.09%). Other phyla including Fusobacteria and Chloroflexi were found at low abundance (< 1%). Variations of the six dominant phyla were tested against different temperatures or Microcystis biomass additions (Additional file 3: Figure S2). The relative abundance of Firmicutes increased significantly with the addition of Microcystis biomass, however, decreased significantly with the elevated temperature (P < 0.05). Actinobacteria showed an opposite pattern. Variations of the relative abundance of the dominant phyla can be found in Additional file 4: Figure S3). The relative abundance of the top ten dominant genera in different treatments was shown in Fig. 4. The number of bacterial genera in the Microcystis-added treatments (especially the H group) was remarkably lower than that of the C group (Fig. 4). Several genera were depleted during the decomposition of Microcystis. However, temperature did not show any consistent effect on the number of bacterial genera among different biomass treatments.

Fig. 4
figure4

Relative abundance of the top 10 genus in different treatment groups. C, without addition of Microcystis; L, low Microcystis biomass; H, high Microcystis biomass. The color from blue to red indicates average relative abundance of genus in each treatment groups

Full size image

Relationships between environmental variables and bacterial community composition

Mantel test was used to investigate the relationships between bacterial communities and the measured environmental variables. Both OTU-based Bray-Curtis distance and phylogenetic tree-based unweighted UniFrac distance were taken into account. NH4+-N (P < 0.001), TOC (P < 0.001), ORP (P < 0.001) and TN (P < 0.05) were significantly correlated with both of the bacterial community distance matrices (Table 2).

Table 2 Correlations as determined by Mantel tests between the bacterial community composition (Bray-Curtis and the unweighted UniFrac dissimilarity) and the measured environmental variables
Full size table

In order to increase the robustness of the results, canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was employed (Additional file 5: Figure S4). The two dominant axis totally explain 31.9% species-environment correlation. Community based on taxa abundance showed clustering characteristics with different Microcystis addition. TOC, DO and NH4+-N were the main environmental factors driving the community differentiation. According to the results of forward selection and ordination (Additional file 6: Table S2), ORP (P < 0.001), NH4+-N (P < 0.01) and TOC (P < 0.05) were the most significant environmental factors driving the bacterial community composition.

Discussion

Decomposition of Microcystis modifies the diversity of bacterial community

Remarkable decreases in the diversity of bacterial community were observed for the Microcystis-addition treatments after 5-day incubation. The lowest diversity of bacterial community was observed in the H group (Fig. 2). Wang et al. [12] investigated the diversity of the bacterial community in nonylphenol-degrading sediments and found that the Shannon-Wiener index decreased with incubation time. The decomposition of Microcystis also reduced the diversity of bacterial community. However, Dilly et al. [13], investigating the bacterial community diversity in relation to the decomposition of crop residues, found a pattern of increased bacterial diversity with decomposition. The decreased diversity of our results in the H group was mainly due to the harsh environments (Low DO and ORP conditions) that favored the growth of specific bacterial groups [7], which could be a process of environmental filtering. The depletion of several bacterial genera in Microcystis-added groups in comparison with the control treatments also confirmed these results (Fig. 4).

Zhou et al. [14] indicated that nutrient additions could potentially weaken competition among different bacterial species and stimulate an increase in population growth. However, remarkable decreases in bacterial community diversity were observed in our experiments. The contradictory results could be attributed to the differences in the initial states of the two studies. The geochemical conditions in Zhou et al.’s study were relatively toxic to many organisms (low pH and high concentrations of nitrate, aluminum and other metals) and had a limited carbon source. However, the initial state of our study was not a harsh environment. In the present study, water was collected from a eutrophic lake (TN, 0.86 mg/L; TP, 0.22 μg/L; TOC, 5.92 mg/L; DO, 6.4 mg/L; pH, 7.44; NH4+-N, 0.2 mg/L; ORP, 51 mv). Therefore, the addition of Microcystis did not stimulate the growth of a variety of bacterial groups. However, the decomposition of large amounts of Microcystis biomass represented an extreme perturbation for the bacterial community. The consumption of the dissolved oxygen during decomposition produced an environmental stress for the bacterial community [11]. Moreover, toxins produced by Microcystis were released to the waters during its decomposition [15].

Effects of Microcystis biomass and temperature on the bacterial community composition during the decomposition of Microcystis

The clear separation among the C, L and H groups (Fig. 3a) indicated that the addition of Microcystis affected the composition of the bacterial community (Fig. 3a). Meanwhile, higher dissimilarity of bacterial community was also observed in the H group (Fig. 3c). The scatter of the H group could be resulted from a divergence of species drove by the violent Microcystis decomposition compared with the other two groups. The pattern of phylogenetic-based beta diversity of bacterial community also highlighted the great effects of Microcystis decomposition of high biomass (Fig. 3b). Previous studies have verified the dynamic changes of bacterial community composition during Microcystis decomposition in freshwater lakes [16, 17]. Li et al. [7] reported strong relationships between the bacterial community composition and Microcystis decomposition, which were apparent along a gradient of Microcystis biomass. In lake sediments, the addition of Microcystis biomass (both 200 μg/L and 2000 μg/L) also induced marked shifts in the composition of the bacterial community [16]. Here, we found the biomass of added Microcystis played more important roles than temperature in altering the composition of bacterial communities during the decomposition of Microcystis.

Some studies showed that bacterial community composition was related to the availability of organic matter, dissolved oxygen and pH [7, 18]. In our study, the rapid decay of Microcystis created an environment with a higher concentration of TN, TP, TOC and lower ORP and DO (Fig. 1). The results of the Mantel test demonstrated that TOC (P < 0.001), ORP (P < 0.001), NH4+-N (P < 0.001) and TN (P < 0.05) were significant environmental variables in correlation with bacterial community composition (Table 2). Meanwhile, the result of CCA indicated that TOC, NH4+-N and DO were the key environmental factors driving the bacterial community composition (Additional file 5: Figure S4 and Additional file 6: Table S2). Previous studies have also found the correlations between DOC [19], TN [20], NH4+-N [20] and the composition or diversity of bacterial community.

Gucht et al. [21] found that Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum in freshwater ecosystems, the relative abundance of this phylum being very high in our samples, especially for Betaproteobacteria (Additional file 4: Figure S3). The relative abundance of Firmicutes increased significantly after the addition of Microcystis compared with the C group (Additional file 3: Figure S2). The genus Clostridium affiliated with Firmicutes was influenced strongly by the decomposition of Microcystis (Fig. 4). Previous study has observed that Clostridium was the dominant group (accounting for 72% of the sequenced clones) during Microcystis blooms [9]. Moreover, Zhao et al. [8] also found an increased abundance of Clostridium during the anaerobic decomposition of organic matter. Actinobacteria play an important role in the material cycle of freshwater ecosystems [22]. Although the decomposition of Microcystis provided a large amount of TOC, TN and TP, the process consumed much dissolved oxygen in the microcosm, which could partly explain the decreased relative abundance of some aerobic bacteria, such as Actinobacteria [23].

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the biomass of added Microcystis was a key variable that shaped the composition and diversity of bacterial community in the microcosms, whereas temperature played little roles in driving the bacterial community composition. The intense decomposition of higher biomass of Microcystis reduced bacterial diversity. Clostridium affiliated to Firmicutes increased markedly during the process. TN, TP, TOC, NH4+-N and ORP were the dominant environmental factors correlated with bacterial community composition. The findings of the present study would be helpful for further understanding the impacts of cyanobacterial blooms on freshwater ecosystems.

Methods

Experimental design

Microcosms were built using sediments, lake water and Microcystis assemblages collected from Meiliang Bay (N 31o29’14″, E 120o12’41″) of Lake Taihu, China, a large shallow eutrophic freshwater lake that suffering from serious Microcystis blooms every year in summer. Before microcosms constructed, the sediments were sieved (1-mm mesh) to remove macrofauna and large particles. Lake water was filtered with a plankton net to collect Microcystis colonies. The Microcystis colonies were then rinsed three times with ultrapure water before use. The Microcystis spp. constituted up to 97% of the total phytoplankton cells by using microscopic examination. The collected Microcystis colonies were frozen at − 80 °C and then freeze-dried. The microcosms were built using plexiglas columns (diameter: 16 cm; height: 30 cm). The homogenized sediments and water were transferred into the columns and stabilize for 2 days under the designated temperature in an incubator. The results of our experiments indicated that the sterilization of Microcystis before biomass addition would not significantly affect the diversity and composition of bacterial community in water of the microcosms (Additional file 7: Methods and results of the supplementary experiments; Additional file 8: Figure S5; Additional file 9: Figure S6 and Additional file 10: Figure S7). The freeze-dried Microcystis colonies were added to the microcosms. Based on the Microcystis biomass in Lake Taihu reported in previous investigations [7, 8], three different Microcystis biomass treatments were designed: (1) the H treatment with a high Microcystis biomass addition (H, 0.33 g/L), (2) the L treatment with a low Microcystis biomass addition (L, 0.17 g/L) and (3) the control treatment without Microcystis addition (C, 0 g/L). The microcosms were incubated under three different temperatures, 15, 25 and 35 °C, to investigate the effects of temperature on the bacterial communities during decomposition process.

Sampling and physicochemical analysis

Referring to the results of previous studies [7, 8], marked variations in water properties were expected on days 2 to 5 after the addition of Microcystis, which signified violent decomposition. Therefore, samples were collected on day 5 for microbial community analysis. Water characteristics, including pH, oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) and dissolved oxygen (DO) were analyzed with electrodes during incubation. Total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) were determined following Jin et al. [24]. The concentrations of ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N), nitrite nitrogen (NO2−-N) were measured by a continuous flow analyzer (San++, SKALAR, Netherlands) using the water samples collected after they passed through a 0.45 μm pore-size filter. Bacteria were collected with a 0.22 μm pore-size polycarbonate membrane filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The filters were stored at − 80 °C before further processing [25].

DNA extraction, PCR and pyrosequencing

We extracted bacterial genome DNA from each water sample using the E.Z.N.A.® Water DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, Doraville, GA) [26]. A nano-Drop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA) verified both the quality and quantity of the extracted DNA, and the extracted DNA was then amplified by PCR. The primers 533R (TTACCGCGGCTGCTGGCAC) and 8F (AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG), fixed with the Roche 454 sequencing adapters, were used to amplify the bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Meanwhile, individual 10-bp barcode sequences of each sample were linked to the reverse primer 533R [27]. To reduce any error resulting from PCR amplification, three parallels were employed for each PCR reaction. The total volume of the PCR mixture was 20 μL, including 4 μL 5× Prime STAR Buffer (plus Mg2+), 0.4 μL FastPfu DNA polymerase (2.5 U/ μL), 0.4 μL for each of the forward and reverse primers (5 μM), 2 μL dNTPs (2.5 mM), 10 ng DNA template (about 10 ng/μL). The thermal cycling conditions for PCR amplification followed the methods of Schloss et al. [28]. After being pooled, the PCR products were verified by gel electrophoresis, then purified using the AxyPrep DNA gel purification kit (Axygen Biotechnology Hangzhou Ltd., Hangzhou, China). After quantifying the purified PCR products, > 200 ng DNA of each sample was sent to the Majorbio Company in Shanghai for pyrosequencing on a 454 FLX Titanium platform (Roche).

Data processing and statistical analysis

The DNA sequence data were trimmed and de-noised following the online 454 standard operating procedure (SOP) of the Mothur 1.39.0 software package [28, 29]. Sequences that were not fully matched with primers, having an average quality score < 27 or containing any ambiguous reads, homopolymers > 8 nt or sequences < 200 bp (excluding the barcode or primer) were removed from further analysis [30]. The remaining sequences were converted by reverse complementation and aligned against a bacterial SILV16S rRNA gene template (using NAST algorithm) [28]. Putative chimeric sequences and sequencing errors were removed by using the chimera.uchime and pre.cluster commands in Mothur [31]. The sequences were classified using a Bayesian classifier referring to the 16S rRNA gene training set of Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu) with the threshold of 80% [32]. Then, unknown sequences and sequences affiliated with Archaea, Cyanobacteria, chloroplast were excluded from further analysis.

Operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were clustered within the remaining sequences at a 3% dissimilarity [33]. The same number of sequences was drawn randomly from each dataset for estimating diversity at the same sequencing depth. The OTU richness was calculated by Shannon index (H) according to the OTU table, while the phylogenetic diversity (PD) was estimated using Faith’s index based on the phylogenetic tree [34, 35]. The command summary.single was used to calculate the Shannon index in Mothur [30]. The picante package [36] was used to estimate the Faith’s PD [35] in R.

To determine the dissimilarity within bacterial community composition between any of the two sample pairs, we calculated the Bray-Curtis and unweighted UniFrac dissimilarity matrices [37]. Based on both of the matrices, non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) was performed to estimate dissimilarities between water samples by using the vegan [38] and picante [36] packages in R. PERMANOVA (Adonis) was used to test the significance of patterns observed in NMDS. To demonstrate the relative abundance of the top ten genera in the different treatments, HemI software was used to generate the heatmap [39].

The function cca of vegan package was employed to explore the relationships between environmental variables and microbial community structure. The unimodal distribution pattern of bacterial communities along environmental gradient determined CCA (canonical correspondence analysis) rather than RDA (redundancy analysis) was the better method to explain the relationship. Environmental matrix and microbial community matrix were calculated by Euclidean distance and Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distance, respectively [40]. The Mantel test, run with 999 permutations, was employed to determine the relationships between the dissimilarities of bacterial communities and the Euclidean distance matrix of measured environmental variables [41]. Dissimilarities of bacterial community composition were calculated based on both the Bray-Curtis distance and unweighted UniFrac distance. The Mantel test was run using the vegan package in R [42].

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The obtained raw data have been deposited in the NCBI short-reads archive database (Accession Number: SRP097674).

Availability of data and materials

The obtained raw data have been added to the NCBI short-reads archive database (Accession Number: SRP097674). Other data generated during the study are included in this manuscript and the additional files.

Abbreviations

DO:

Dissolved oxygen

H:

High Microcystis biomass treatment

L:

Low Microcystis biomass treatment

NH4 +-N:

Ammonia nitrogen

NO2 —N:

Nitrite nitrogen. C, without addition of Microcystis

NO3 —N:

Nitrate nitrogen

ORP:

Oxidation-reduction potential

TN:

Total nitrogen

TOC:

Total organic carbon

TP:

Total phosphorus

References

  1. 1.

    Guo L. Doing battle with the green monster of Taihu lake. Science. 2007;317(5842):1166.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chen M, Chen F, Xing P, Li HB, Wu QL. Microbial eukaryotic community in response to Microcystis spp. bloom, as assessed by an enclosure experiment in Lake Taihu, China. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;74(1):19–31.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zhang Z, Zhang XX, Wu B, Yin J, Yu Y, Yang L. Comprehensive insights into microcystin-LR effects on hepatic lipid metabolism using cross-omics technologies. J Hazard Mater. 2016;315:126–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Buchan A, Lecleir GR, Gulvik CA, González JM. Master recyclers: features and functions of bacteria associated with phytoplankton blooms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(10):686–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Eiler A, Bertilsson S. Comparison of freshwater bacterial communities associated with cyanobacterial blooms in four Swedish lakes. Environ Microbiol. 2010;6(12):1228–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Parveen B, Ravet V, Djediat C, Mary I, Quiblier C, Debroas D. Bacterial communities associated with Microcystis colonies differ from free-living communities living in the same ecosystem. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2013;5(5):716–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Li HB, Xing P, Wu QL. Characterization of the bacterial community composition in a hypoxic zone induced by Microcystis blooms in Lake Taihu, China. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012;79(3):773–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhao DY, Cao XY, Huang R, Zeng J, Wu QL. Variation of bacterial communities in water and sediments during the decomposition of Microcystis biomass. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0176397.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xing P, Guo L, Tian W, Wu QL. Novel Clostridium populations involved in the anaerobic degradation of Microcystis blooms. ISME J. 2011;5(5):792–800.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yang CH, Liu YZ, Zhu YX, Zhang Y. Microbial transformation of intracellular dissolved organic matter from Microcystis aeruginosa and its effect on the binding of pyrene under oxic and anoxic conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24(7):6461–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    De Figueiredo DR, Reboleira AS, Antunes SC, Abrantes N, Azeiteiro U, Goncalves F, Pereira MJ. The effect of environmental parameters and cyanobacterial blooms on phytoplankton dynamics of a Portuguese temperate lake. Hydrobiologia. 2006;568(1):145–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang SG, Diao XJ, He LS. Effects of algal bloom formation, outbreak, and extinction on heavy metal fractionation in the surficial sediments of Chaohu Lake. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(18):14269–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dilly O, Bloem J, An V, Munch JC. Bacterial diversity in agricultural soils during litter decomposition. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(1):468–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhou JZ, Ye D, Zhang P, Xue K, Liang YT, Joy D, Yang YF, He ZL, Wu LY, David AS, Hazen TC, Tiedje JM, Arkin AP. Stochasticity, succession, and environmental perturbations in a fluidic ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(9):836–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chorus I, Bartram J. Toxic cyanobacteria in water- a guide to their public health consequences, monitoring and management; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shao K, Gao G, Chi K, Qin B, Tang X, Yao X, Dai J. Decomposition of Microcystis blooms: implications for the structure of the sediment bacterial community, as assessed by a mesocosm experiment in Lake Taihu, China. J Basic Microbiol. 2013;53(6):549–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shao K, Zhang L, Wang Y, Yao X, Tang X, Qin B, Gao G. The responses of the taxa composition of particle-attached bacterial community to the decomposition of Microcystis blooms. Sci Total Environ. 2014;488-489(3):236–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kolmonen E. Diversity of cyanobacteria and heterotrophic bacteria in cyanobacterial blooms in Lake Joutikas, Finland. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2004;36(3):201–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Landa M, Blain S, Christaki U, Monchy S, Obernosterer I. Shifts in bacterial community composition associated with increased carbon cycling in a mosaic of phytoplankton blooms. ISME J. 2016;10(1):39–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wu YF, Zheng H, Wu QL, Yang H, Liu SJ. Clostridium algifaecis sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterial species from decomposing algal scum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2014;64(11):3844–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gucht KVD, Vandekerckhove T, Vloemans N, Cousin S, Muylaert K, Sabbe K, Gillis M, Declerk S, Meester LD, Vyverman W. Characterization of bacterial communities in four freshwater lakes differing in nutrient load and food web structure. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005;53(2):205–20.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Elifantz H, Malmstrom RR, Cottrell MT. Assimilation of polysaccharides and glucose by major bacterial groups in the Delaware estuary. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(12):7799–805.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schweitzer B, Huber I, Amann R. Alpha- and beta-Proteobacteria control the consumption and release of amino acids on lake snow aggregates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(2):632–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jin X, Wang S, Pang Y, Chang WF. Phosphorus fractions and the effect of pH on the phosphorus release of the sediments from different trophic areas in Taihu Lake, China. Environ Pollut. 2006;139(2):288–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhao DY, Xu HM, Zeng J. Community composition and assembly processes of the free-living and particle-attached bacteria in Taihu Lake. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2017;93(6):fix062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wu QL, Zwart G, Schauer M, Kamst-Van Agterveld MP, Hahn MW. Bacterioplankton community composition along a salinity gradient of sixteen highmountain lakes located on the Tibetan plateau, China. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(8):5548–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Huang R, Zhao DY, Zeng J. pH affects bacterial community composition in soils across the Huashan watershed, China. Can J Microbiol. 2016;62(9):726–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16S rRNA-based studies. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27310.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Loman NJ, Misra RV, Dallman TJ, Constantinidou C, Gharbia SE, Wain J, Pallen MJ. Performance comparison of benchtop high-throughput sequencing platforms. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(5):434–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kunin V, Engelbrektson A, Ochman H, Hugenholtz P. Wrinkles in the rare biosphere: pyrosequencing errors can lead to artificial inflation of diversity estimates. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12(1):118–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Huse SM, Welch DM, Morrison HG, Sogin ML. Ironing out the wrinkles in the rare biosphere through improved OTU clustering. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12(7):1889–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(16):5261–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Schloss PD, Handelsman J. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(3):1501–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Faith DP. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol Conserv. 1992;61(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hill TC, Walsh KA, Harris JA, Moffett BF. Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003;43(1):1–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(11):1463–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lozupone C, Hamady M, Knight R. UniFrac-An online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinf. 2006;7(1):371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens M, Wagner H. Vegan: community ecology package. Time Int. 2015;1997(6):15–7.

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Deng W, Wang Y, Liu Z, Cheng H, Xue Y. HemI: a toolkit for illustrating heatmaps. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e111988.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Huang R, Zhao D, Jiang CL. Heterogeneity of bacterial community compositions in surface sediments of three Lake zones in Lake Taihu. Proc Natl Acad Sci India B Biol Sci. 2015;85(2):465–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Zhao DY, Cao XY, Huang R. The heterogeneity of composition and assembly processes of the microbial community between different nutrient loading Lake zones in Taihu Lake. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101(14):5913–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB. Vegan: community ecology package. R package vegan. 2015; vers. 2.2–1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The assistance of Xinyin Cao and Xiaowei He with data analysis and experiments are acknowledged.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0402710), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31730013, 41621002, 41571108, 41671078 and 41871096), the National Key Technology R&D Program (2015BAD13B01), the Key Research Program of Frontier Science, CAS (QYZDJ-SSW-DQC030), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20181311), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2018B43414, 2019B17814), the Belt and Road Special Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering (2018490211) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M642147). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, interpretation of data, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Shuren Wang and Dayong Zhao contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Joint International Research Laboratory of Global Change and Water Cycle, Hohai University, Xikang Road 1, Nanjing, 210098, China

    Shuren Wang, Dayong Zhao, Huimin Xu, Rui Huang & Congcong Jiao

  2. State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 73 East Beijing Road, Nanjing, 210008, China

    Shuren Wang & Jin Zeng

  3. Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Texas A&M University, Commerce, TX, 76129, USA

    Lin Guo

Authors
  1. Shuren Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dayong Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jin Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huimin Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rui Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Congcong Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Lin Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SRW, DYZ, JZ and LG designed the experiments; SRW and RH performed the experiments; SRW, HMX, RH and CCJ analyzed the data; SRW, DYZ, JZ, HMX and LG wrote the manuscript; all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Zeng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Comparision of environmental factors under different temperatures. TOC, total organic carbon; DO, dissolved oxygen; ORP, oxidation-reduction potential; TN, total nitrogen; TP, total phosphorus; NH4+-N, ammonia nitrogen; NO3−-N, nitrate nitrogen; NO2−-N, nitrite nitrogen. C, without addition of Microcystis; L, low Microcystis biomass treatment; H, high Microcystis biomass treatment. The same lowercase letter represents there was no significant difference for the environmental factors under different temperatures. (TIF 4274 kb)

Additional file 2:

Table S1. Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial phyla/subphyla in water samples of different treatment groups. (PDF 24 kb)

Additional file 3:

Figure S2. Relative abundance of the six dominant bacterial phyla/subphyla in water samples of different treatment groups. (A) different Microcystis addition treatments; (B) different temperature treatments. C, without addition of Microcystis. L, low Microcystis biomass treatment; H, High Microcystis biomass treatment. Significant differences between different treatment groups was indicated by asterisk (Duncan’s multiple range test, * P < 0.05). (TIF 3878 kb)

Additional file 4:

Figure S3. Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial phyla/subphyla in water samples of different treatment groups. (A) Microcystis addition treatments, (B) different temperature treatments. C, without addition of Microcystis; L, low Microcystis biomass treatment; H, high Microcystis biomass treatment. (TIF 2026 kb)

Additional file 5

Figure S4. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) indicating the relationships between environmental variables and microbial community composition. Environmental matrix and microbial community matrix were calculated using the Euclidean distance and Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distance, respectively. Environmental variables were indicated with black arrows. C, without addition of Microcystis; L, low Microcystis biomass treatment; H, high Microcystis biomass treatment. (TIF 893 kb)

Additional file 6:

Table S2. Results of the forward selection and ordination of canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). (PDF 73 kb)

Additional file 7:

Methods and results of the supplementary experiments. (PDF 83 kb)

Additional file 8:

Figure S5. Diversity of the bacterial communities derived from the Microcystis-sterilized and Microcystis-unsterilized groups (paired t-test). U, Microcystis-unsterilized groups; S, Microcystis-sterilized groups. Shannon, Shannon-Wiener index; PD, phylogenetic diversity. (TIF 47 kb)

Additional file 9

Figure S6. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) of the bacterial communities based on (A) unweighted UniFrac dissimilarity matrix; (B) Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix. U, Microcystis-unsterilized group; S, Microcystis-sterilized group. The values of R2 and P indicated the results of PERMANOVA. (TIF 1506 kb)

Additional file 10:

Figure S7. Dissimilarity of bacterial communities within and between the Microcystis-sterilized (S) and Microcystis-unsterilized (U) groups. (A) based on unweighted UniFrac dissimilarity matrix; (B) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix. U, Microcystis-unsterilized group; S, Microcystis-sterilized group. The same lowercase letter indicates no significant difference between groups (Duncan’s multiple range test). (TIF 62 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Zhao, D., Zeng, J. et al. Variations of bacterial community during the decomposition of Microcystis under different temperatures and biomass. BMC Microbiol 19, 207 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1585-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Microcystis decomposition
  • Biomass
  • Temperature
  • Bacterial community

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us