Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Cloning, functional expression and characterization of a bifunctional 3-hydroxybutanal dehydrogenase /reductase involved in acetone metabolism by Desulfococcus biacutus

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
BMC MicrobiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:280

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0899-9

  • Received: 29 July 2016
  • Accepted: 17 November 2016
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

The strictly anaerobic, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfococcus biacutus can utilize acetone as sole carbon and energy source for growth. Whereas in aerobic and nitrate-reducing bacteria acetone is activated by carboxylation with CO2 to acetoacetate, D. biacutus involves CO as a cosubstrate for acetone activation through a different, so far unknown pathway. Proteomic studies indicated that, among others, a predicted medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (MDR) superfamily, zinc-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase (locus tag DebiaDRAFT_04514) is specifically and highly produced during growth with acetone.

Results

The MDR gene DebiaDRAFT_04514 was cloned and overexpressed in E. coli. The purified recombinant protein required zinc as cofactor, and accepted NADH/NAD+ but not NADPH/NADP+ as electron donor/acceptor. The pH optimum was at pH 8, and the temperature optimum at 45 °C. Highest specific activities were observed for reduction of C3 - C5-aldehydes with NADH, such as propanal to propanol (380 ± 15 mU mg−1 protein), butanal to butanol (300 ± 24 mU mg−1), and 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-butanediol (248 ± 60 mU mg−1), however, the enzyme also oxidized 3-hydroxybutanal with NAD+ to acetoacetaldehyde (83 ± 18 mU mg−1).

Conclusion

The enzyme might play a key role in acetone degradation by D. biacutus, for example as a bifunctional 3-hydroxybutanal dehydrogenase/reductase. Its recombinant production may represent an important step in the elucidation of the complete degradation pathway.

Keywords

  • Acetone activation
  • Sulfate-reducing bacteria
  • Carbonylation
  • Bifunctional MDR superfamily oxidoreductase

Background

Desulfococcus biacutus strain KMRActS is a Gram-negative, sulfate-reducing deltaproteobacterium capable of using acetone as sole carbon and electron source [1]. Due to the small energy budget of this bacterium, activation of acetone by carboxylation to acetoacetate with concomitant hydrolysis of two (or more) ATP equivalents, as found in aerobic and nitrate-reducing bacteria [26], is hardly possible. Early physiological findings indicated that acetoacetate is not a free intermediate in the degradation pathway [7]. Correspondingly, no acetone carboxylase activity was detected in cell-free extracts, and no acetone carboxylases were found in the genome and proteome of this bacterium [79]. Experiments with dense cell suspensions and cell-free extracts suggested that acetone may be activated through a carbonylation or a formylation reaction, and that acetoacetaldehyde rather than acetoacetate may be formed as an intermediate [3, 8]. In cell-free extracts of acetone-grown D. biacutus cells, acetoacetaldehyde was trapped as its dinitrophenylhydrazone derivative and was identified by mass spectrometry, after reactions with acetone, ATP and CO as cosubstrates [8]. This reaction was not observed in cell-free extract of butyrate-grown cells, hence, the proposed acetone-activating enzyme, and most likely the entire acetone utilization pathway, is inducibly expressed in D. biacutus. Nonetheless, the mechanism of the acetone activation reaction remains unknown so far.

A differential-proteomics approach comparing acetone- and butyrate-grown D. biacutus cells revealed several proteins/genes that were specifically and strongly induced in acetone-grown cells, but not in butyrate-grown cells [9]. One of the most prominent acetone-inducible proteins observed is encoded by gene (IMG locus tag) DebiaDRAFT_04514, and is annotated as medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (MDR) superfamily alcohol dehydrogenase (COG1063 in the Clusters of Orthologous Groups classification system). Other strongly induced proteins are a predicted thiamine diphosphate (TDP)-requiring enzyme (COG0028), and a cobalamin (B12)-binding subunit (COG2185) of a methylmalonyl-CoA mutase-like complex [9].

Alcohol dehydrogenases (ADH) usually catalyze the reversible oxidation of primary or secondary alcohols to aldehydes or ketones, and the reactions are coupled to the reduction/oxidation of a pyridine nucleotide [10, 11]. Further, there are three types of ADHs known which are classified by the absence or presence, and the type of incorporated metal ion: ADHs that are independent of a metal ion, iron-dependent ADHs, which can be oxygen-sensitive [12, 13], and zinc-dependent ADHs; DebiaDRAFT_04514 is predicted as a zinc-dependent ADH.

In the present study, we cloned, heterologously expressed, purified, and characterized the acetone-inducible gene/protein DebiaDRAFT_04514, in an attempt to gain a better understanding of its possible role in the acetone utilization pathway of D. biacutus. This is also the first description of a functionally expressed recombinant enzyme originating from this bacterium.

Methods

Chemicals

All chemicals were at least of analytical grade and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany), Carl Roth GmbH (Germany) or Merck KGaA (Germany). Biochemicals (NADH, NADPH, NAD+ and NADP+) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany). 3-Hydroxybutanal was synthesized by Dr. Thomas Huhn and Fabian Schneider, Chemistry Department of University of Konstanz.

Bacterial growth conditions

Desulfococcus biacutus strain KMRActS (DSM5651) was grown in sulfide-reduced, CO2/bicarbonate-buffered (pH 7.2), freshwater mineral-salts medium as described previously [7, 8]. The medium was supplemented with 5 mM acetone as sole carbon and energy source, and with 10 mM sulfate as electron acceptor. Cultures were incubated at 30 °C in the dark under strictly anoxic conditions. Escherichia coli strains TOP10 (Invitrogen) and Rosetta 2 (Merck) were grown aerobically (shaking) in lysogenic broth (LB) medium (10 g l-1 peptone, 5 g l−1 yeast extract, 10 g l−1 NaCl) supplemented with 100 μg ml−1 ampicillin.

Plasmid construction and overexpression

The Qiagen Genomic DNA Kit (Qiagen, Germany) was used for preparation of genomic DNA of D. biacutus. A cell pellet obtained from a 50-ml culture with OD600 ~ 0.3 was resuspended in 1 ml of sterile, DNA-free H2O, and further processed following the manufacturer’s protocol. For construction of expression plasmids, the Champion™ pET Directional TOPO® Expression Kit (Invitrogen) was used (N-terminal His6-tag). The gene of interest of D. biacutus was amplified by PCR, using the forward primer 5′-CACCATGGCAAAAATGATGAAAACAT-3′ (TOPO-cloning overhang underlined) and reverse primer 5′-AACAAAAAAACACTCGACTACATA-3′; the PCR polymerase used was Phusion® High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs), and PCR conditions were 35 cycles of 45s denaturation at 98 °C, 45s annealing at 60 °C, and 90s elongation at 72 °C. The PCR product was ligated into the expression vector pET100 (Invitrogen), and cloning was performed as recommended by the manufacturer. Plasmid DNA of positive clones was purified using Zyppy Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Germany), and correct integration of the insert was confirmed by sequencing (GATC-Biotech, Constance, Germany). The DNASTAR Lasergene 5 software package was used for primer design and for sequence data analysis.

Purified plasmid DNA was used for transformation of chemically competent E. coli Rosetta 2 (DE3) cells (Merck KGaA, Germany). Cells were grown in LB medium (containing 100 μg ml−1 ampicillin and 35 μg ml−1 chloramphenicol) at 37 ° C to OD600 0.4–0.8, followed by addition of 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and 3% (v/v) of ethanol. After induction, the cultures were incubated for further 5h at 18 °C, and then harvested by centrifugation at 2500 × g for 10 min at 4 °C.

Preparation of cell-free extracts

E. coli cells were washed twice with a 20 mM Tris/HCl buffer, pH 7.2, containing 100 mM KCl and 10% (v/v) glycerol, and resuspended in the same buffer supplemented with 0.5 mg ml−1 DNase and 1 mg ml−1 protease inhibitor (Complete Mini, EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail tablets, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Germany) prior to disruption by three passages through a cooled French pressure cell (140 MPa). Cell debris and intact cells were removed by centrifugation (16,000 × g, 10min, 4 °C), and the soluble protein fraction was separated from the membrane protein fraction by ultracentrifugation (104,000 × g, 1h, 4 °C). Cell-free extract of D. biacutus was prepared as described before [8].

Purification of His-tagged proteins

The supernatant containing the soluble protein fraction obtained by ultracentrifugation was loaded on a Protino Ni-NTA column (Macherey-Nagel, Germany) pre-equilibrated with buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.2, 100 mM KCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol). Unspecifically bound proteins were washed off stepwise with the buffer described above containing 20 and 40 mM imidazole. The bound His-tagged proteins were eluted with the same buffer containing 250 mM imidazole. Eluted proteins were concentrated with an Amicon Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filter Device (10 kDa cutoff; Merck Millipore) while the buffer was exchanged twice against the same buffer containing 50 μM ZnCl2. After addition of 30% (v/v) glycerol, the purified, concentrated proteins were stored in aliquots at -20 °C. Protein concentrations were determined after Bradford with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard [14].

Protein gel electrophoresis and identification

For analysis of expression and purification of recombinant protein, one-dimensional denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed with a 4% stacking gel and a 12% resolving gel [15], and with PageRuler Prestained Protein Ladder (Thermo Scientific) as a reference; gels were run at a constant current of 20 mA per gel for 1.5h. For an estimation of the size of the enzyme complex, native PAGE was performed using Mini-Protean TGX Precast Gels (Bio-Rad) with a polyacrylamide gradient of 4 – 15%; Amersham High Molecular Weight Calibration Kit (GE Healthcare) was used as a reference, and gels were run with native-gel running buffer (192 mM Glycine, 25 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.8; without SDS) under constant current of 8 mA per gel for 3h [15, 16]. Protein staining was performed by colloidal Coomassie staining with final concentrations 2% H3PO4, 10% (NH4)2SO4, 20% methanol, and 0.08% (w/v) Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 [17]. Protein bands excised from gels or soluble proteins in preparations were identified by peptide fingerprinting mass spectrometry at the Proteomics facility of University of Konstanz, as described previously [9].

Enzyme assays

All enzyme assays were performed routinely under anoxic conditions, i.e., under N2 gas in cuvettes with rubber stoppers, either in 25 mM MOPS (3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid) buffer (pH 6.0, 7.2 or 8.0) containing 1 g l−1 NaCl, 0.6 g l−1 MgCl2 × 6 H2O, or in 50 mM Tris/HCl buffer (pH 9.0), each containing 3 mM DTT and 50 μM ZnCl2. Reduction of substrates was carried out with 0.1 mM NADH (or NADPH), and oxidation of substrates was performed with 0.5 or 2.5 mM NAD+ (or NADP+), as co-substrates, as specified in Table 1. Reactions were started by addition of 5 mM substrate followed by spectrophotometrical measurement of absorption (increase or decrease) of NADH at 340 nm (εNADH = 6.292 mM-1 • cm−1) [18].
Table 1

Specific NAD(H)-dependent oxidoreductase activities determined for the heterologously expressed and purified Debia-MDR protein

Reduction with NADH

Oxidation with NAD+

Substrate1)

Spec. activity

mU mg−1

Substrate2)

Spec. activity

mU mg−1

Formaldehyde

b.d.

Methanol

n.d.

Acetaldehyde

52 ± 14

Ethanol

73 ± 13

Propanal

380 ± 15

1-Propanolb

22 ± 2

Butanal

301 ± 24

1-Butanol

47 ± 15

Isobutanal

276 ± 30

Isobutanol

n.d.

Pentanal

325 ± 35

1-Pentanol

11 ± 3

Benzaldehyde

b.d.

Benzyl alcohol

n.d.

Propanone (Acetone)

93 ± 2

2-Propanola (Isopropanol)

21 ± 1

Butanone

65 ± 11

2-Butanolb

115 ± 8

2-Pentanone

126 ± 38

2-Pentanol

n.d.

3-Pentanone

141 ± 19

3-Pentanol

n.d.

2-Hexanone

45 ± 9

2-Hexanol

n.d.

3-Hydroxybutanone (Acetoine)

326 ± 38

2,3-Butanediol

150 ± 8

2,3-Butandione (Diacetyl)

298 ± 42

3-Hydroxybutanone (Acetoine)

b.d.

3-Hydroxybutanal

248 ± 59

1,3-Butanediol

80 ± 23

4-Hydroxy-2-butanone

155 ± 31

3-Oxobutanal (Acetoacetaldehyde)

n.s.

3-Hydroxybutanal

83 ± 18

4-Hydroxy-2-butanone

18 ± 3

b.d. below detection limit (<1 mU mg−1 protein), n.d. not determined, n.s. no substrate was available for testing

1)Assay conditions: anoxic 25 mM MOPS buffer (pH 7.2) plus 3 mM DTT and 50 μM ZnCl2, 30 °C. Reactions in reductive direction were assayed with 0.1 mM NADH. Reactions were started by addition of 5 mM substrate

2)Assay conditions: anoxic 25 mM MOPS buffer (pH 8.0) plus 3 mM DTT and 50 μM ZnCl2, 30 °C. Reactions in the oxidative direction were assayed with 2.5 mM NAD+, or at pH 7.2 with 0.5 mM NAD+(a), or at pH 7.2 with 2.5 mM NAD+(b)

Results

Predicted features of DebiaDRAFT_04514 based on its amino acid sequence

Locus tag DebiaDRAFT_04514 was predicted (IMG annotation) to encode a threonine dehydrogenase or related Zn-dependent dehydrogenase, which belongs to the MDR superfamily of alcohol dehydrogenases: DebiaDRAFT_04514 (in the following abbreviated as Debia-MDR) harbors conserved zinc-binding catalytic domains of alcohol dehydrogenases (protein domains Adh_N, ADH_zinc-N) with a GroES-like structure and a NAD(P)-binding Rossman fold. The predicted molecular mass of the Debia-MDR monomer is 38,272 Da. The MDR-family proteins in bacteria and yeasts typically form tetramers [19], and also for Debia-MDR, a tetramer interface (conserved domain cd08285) was predicted [20] (see below).

While amino acid sequence identities of different MDR family enzymes can be only 20% or less [21], Debia-MDR exhibited up to 70% sequence identity to predicted, uncharacterized alcohol dehydrogenases, e.g., of Desulfonatronovibrio magnus (WP_045216775) and Geobacter uraniireducens (ABQ28495 and WP_041246222), and 47% sequence identity to a characterized alcohol dehydrogenase of C. beijerinckii NRRL B-593 (locus ADH_CLOBE; P25984), which utilizes acetone and butanal as substrates [22]. In addition, Debia-MDR showed 21% sequence identity to a characterized acetoin reductase/2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase of Clostridium beijerinckii [23].

Heterologous overproduction and purification of Debia-MDR

Recombinant expression of Debia-MDR with high yield was obtained with E. coli Rosetta 2 cells harboring the expression plasmid pET100-Debia_04514N when grown in LB medium at 37 °C to an optical density of ~ 0.5: subsequently, cells were induced by addition of isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; 0.5 mM), and upon induction, the medium was supplemented also with 3% (v/v) ethanol; addition of ethanol induces the heat-shock response and increases the production of chaperones (GroES/EL and DnaK/J) with positive effects on correct protein folding [24]. After induction, the cultures were incubated further for 5h at 18 °C.

Figure 1a shows a representative preparation of His-tag purified protein separated on a denaturing SDS-PAGE gel. There was one major band with the expected molecular mass of approx. 41 kDa (native Debia-MDR, app. 38.3 kDa; plus His-Tag, app. 3 kDa). The identity of recombinant Debia-MDR was confirmed by peptide fingerprinting mass spectrometry. Minor contaminations in the protein preparation (see Fig. 1a) were identified as E. coli proteins, but not any other oxidoreductase (data not shown). In addition, also a native PAGE was performed in order to estimate the size of the native protein complex (Fig. 1b). Here, purified Debia-MDR appeared as a single protein band at about 170 kDa molecular mass. Thus, native Debia-MDR has most likely a homotetrameric structure, which is in accordance with the bioinformatic prediction of a tetramer-binding domain in its amino acid sequence (see above).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

a, b. Evaluation of the purity of recombinant, His-tagged Desulfococcus biacutus MDR protein by denaturing PAGE (a), and analysis of its native molecular weight by native PAGE (b). M, molecular weight markers (kDa)

Zinc- and NADH-dependency of Debia-MDR

A zinc-dependency of the Debia-MDR enzyme activity, as predicted by homology, was confirmed. For example, with acetone and NADH as substrates (see below), no activity was detectable in the absence of Zn2+. Incubation of the enzyme preparation with 50 μM Zn2+ for 30min prior to the enzyme assays led to a specific activity of 4.0 mU mg-1 protein, while addition of 50 μM Zn2+ to the enzyme preparation directly after the His-tag purification step (and its presence during storage at -20 °C) led to a maximal activity of 93 mU mg−1, each with acetone and NADH as substrates. Further, the enzyme in the presence of Zn2+ was inhibited completely by addition of 100 μM HgCl2 as typical of Zn-dependent MDR dehydrogenases, e.g., threonine 3-dehydrogenase of E. coli, 3-hydoxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase of P. putida, or a dehydrogenase of Geotrichum capitatum [2527]. Further, the enzyme accepted only NAD+/NADH as electron acceptor/donor. No activity was detectable with NADP+/NADPH, which is also typical of most MDR superfamily dehydrogenase enzymes [28].

Substrate range

The Debia-MDR enzyme showed no reaction with L-threonine as substrate and NAD+, as opposed to its initial sequence-based functional prediction. However, the enzyme exhibited activity with a range of short- and medium-chain aldehydes, ketones, and alcohols, as illustrated in Table 1. With respect to the aldehydes tested (Table 1), the enzyme showed highest specific activity in the reduction of propanal (380 mU mg−1 = 100%), followed by pentanal (85%), butanal (79%), isobutanal (72%), 3-hydroxybutanal (65%), and acetaldehyde (14%); no activity was detectable with formaldehyde or benzaldehyde. With respect to the non-substituted ketones tested (Table 1), activities were generally lower than those with aldehydes: the enzyme showed highest activity for reduction of 3-pentanone (141 mU mg−1 = 37% of activity with propanal), followed by 2-pentanone (33%), propanone (acetone) (24%), butanone (17%), and 2-hexanone (12%). The affinity (Km) of the enzyme for acetone as substrate was determined to be 0.04 mM (Additional file 1: Figure S1), which is low compared to other acetone-reducing dehydrogenases, e.g., that of Sulfolobus solfataricus (Km = 6.6 mM) and Equus caballus (Km = 135 mM) [11, 29]. Further, the enzyme exhibited high activity for reduction of substituted ketones, such as 3-hydroxybutanone (acetoin) (86%), 2,3-butanedione (diacetyl) (78%), and 4-hydroxy-2-butanone (41%). Unfortunately, no substrate was available to test a reduction of 3-oxobutanal (acetoacetaldehyde) (see below). The activities for the corresponding reverse reactions with NAD+ were lower, for example with propanol, butanol, or pentanol as substrates (<18% relative to the corresponding forward reactions with NADH), or with 2,3-butanediol (46%) or 1,3-butanediol (32%); exceptions were ethanol (140%) and 2-butanol (177%), while no activity was detectable with 3-hydroxybutanone (acetoin) (Table 1).

Interestingly, we observed that the enzyme catalyzed also the oxidation of 3-hydroxybutanal with NAD+, hence, a reaction in addition to the corresponding reductive reaction of the same substrate with NADH, though with lower apparent activity (app. 33% of the activity in reductive direction). Thus, the Debia-MDR appeared to be a bifunctional 3-hydroxybutanal reductase/dehydrogenase (see Discussion). A similar bi-functionality of the enzyme was confirmed with 4-hydroxy-2-butanone as substrate (see Table 1).

pH and temperature optimum

The effect of pH on the Debia-MDR activity was tested in reactions with butanal and NADH as substrates, at pH 6.0, 7.2, 8.0 (each in 25 mM MOPS buffer) and at pH 9.0 (in 50 mM Tris/HCl buffer). The pH optimum was between pH 7.0 and 8.0 (Additional file 1: Table S1). Further, the effect of temperature on the activity was tested in the range of 25 °C to 50 °C, with butanal and NADH in MOPS buffer, pH 7.2, as described above. The highest specific activity was detected at 45 °C (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Acetone-inducible butanal dehydrogenase / 3-hydroxybutanal reductase activity confirmed in cell-free extracts of D. biacutus

Enzyme assays were performed also with cell-free extracts of D. biacutus, in order to confirm that the reductase/dehydrogenase activity attributed to Debia-MDR is induced by acetone, as indicated already by the proteomics data [9]. For example, with butanal as substrate and NAD+, cell-free extract of acetone-grown cells exhibited an activity of 20 ± 3 mU mg−1 protein, whereas in extracts of butyrate-grown cells, the activity was 10-fold reduced (2 ± 0.1 mU mg−1 protein). Also with 3-hydroxybutanal as substrate in the reductive direction with NADH, the activity was ca. 3-fold higher in extracts of acetone-grown cells (7.4 ± 0.4 mU mg−1 protein) compared to that of butyrate-grown cells (2.6 ± 0.9 mU mg−1 protein).

Discussion

Debia-MDR of Desulfococcus biacutus, which was found previously to be inducibly expressed during growth with acetone [9], was successfully cloned and overexpressed in E. coli. The features determined with the recombinant enzyme correspond well to those predicted from its amino acid sequence. The enzyme is active only in the presence of zinc, and with NAD+/NADH as electron acceptor/donor, but not with NADP+/NADPH. Further, the activity of Debia-MDR, as prepared in this study, was not sensitive to molecular oxygen, in contrast to iron-dependent dehydrogenases, which commonly are inactivated quickly under oxic conditions (half-life of minutes to a couple of hours under oxic conditions; [12, 30]). The native enzyme showed a molecular mass of app. 170 kDa, which corresponds well to its bioinformatically predicted homotetrameric structure. Other described zinc-dependent ADHs in bacteria and yeasts also exhibit a homotetrameric structure, while dimeric ADHs can be found in higher plants and mammals [3133]. The enzyme exhibited a pH optimum between pH 7 and 8, and a slightly elevated temperature optimum (app. 45 °C); D. biacutus grows optimally at 30 °C and cannot grow at higher temperatures [1]. The enzyme showed reductase activity with aldehydes and ketones, preferably of a chain length of three to five carbon atoms, as far as tested in this study (Table 1). Moreover, based on the specific activities observed, aldehydes were preferred over ketones. A branched-chain aldehyde was also accepted (isobutanal), with an activity comparable to that with the linear analogue (butanal). The specific activities for alcohol oxidations determined were only about one fifth to one tenth of those for the respective reduction of aldehydes/ketones; these low activities are partly due to the unfavorable equilibria of these reactions, which typically are on the side of the alcohols.

Based on the observed substrate range and catalytic efficiencies (Table 1), and in the context of the yet limited information that is available on the acetone degradation pathway of D. biacutus, several roles of Debia-MDR are to be considered.

First, the enzyme could play a role in the oxidation of isopropanol to acetone, since D. biacutus is able to utilize also isopropanol via the acetone pathway: our preliminary proteomic analyses of isopropanol-grown cells in comparison to acetone-grown cells (data not shown) indicated that the same set of enzymes is expressed, e.g., the predicted thiamine diphosphate (TDP)-requiring enzyme (DebiaDRAFT_04566), the cobalamin (B12)-binding subunit of a methylmalonyl-CoA mutase-like complex (DebiaDRAFT_04573-74), and the zinc-dependent MDR described in this study (DEBIADraft_04514). However, during growth with isopropanol, yet another dehydrogenase candidate (DebiaDRAFT_04392) appeared to be additionally, and strongly produced in comparison to acetone-grown cells, and this candidate is predicted as iron-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase. Therefore, we suggest that this dehydrogenase, DebiaDRAFT_04392, may be the dehydrogenase that funnels isopropanol into the acetone pathway, and not the zinc-dependent dehydrogenase examined in this study.

Second, Debia-MDR may have a detoxifying function, by reducing overproduced toxic aldehydes, which may be formed in the acetone activation pathway, to less toxic alcohols. For example, one proposed pathway [9] that could involve the predicted TDP-requiring enzyme (DebiaDRAFT_04566) and the B12-binding methylmalonyl-CoA mutase-like complex (DebiaDRAFT_04573-74) may proceed via a carbonylation (or formylation) of acetone to 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanal (2-hydroxyisobutanal) followed by linearization of this branched-chain aldehyde to 3-hydroxybutanal, respectively. Hence, Debia-MDR might play a role in a reversible conversion of, e.g., 3-hydroxybutanal to less toxic 1,3-butanediol, as suggested by its high activity towards this reaction (Table 1).

Third, when considering the abovementioned proposed pathway, and as illustrated in Fig. 2, Debia-MDR might also play a role in the oxidation of the proposed 3-hydroxybutanal intermediate to acetoacetaldehyde, as suggested by its high activity towards this reaction (Table 1). Moreover, the extremely reactive acetoacetaldehyde was previously shown (as dinitrophenylhydrazone adduct) to appear at low concentration in cell-free extracts of D. biacutus in the presence of acetone and CO [8]. Notably, the specific activity of Debia-MDR dehydrogenase for 3-hydroxybutanal oxidation to acetoacetaldehyde determined in vitro (83 nmol min−1 mg−1) is sufficient to explain the specific substrate turnover rate of D. biacutus during growth with acetone and sulfate (19 nmol min−1 mg−1) [34], though upstream and downstream processes may influence the rate of this reaction step in vivo.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Illustration of a postulated pathway for acetone degradation in Desulfococcus biacutus with an attributed role of Debia-MDR as 3-hydroxybutanal dehydrogenase. In this hypothetical pathway, acetone would be carbonylated or formylated to a branched-chain aldehyde and then isomerized to linear 3-hydroxybutanal. The 3-hydroxybutanal would be oxidized to acetoacetaldehyde by the enzyme described in this study. Subsequently, acetoacetaldehyde could be converted to acetoacetyl-CoA (see also main text)

Finally, in the context of the observed bifunctionality of Debia-MDR for both oxidation and reduction of 3-hydroxybutanal, it is tempting to speculate further whether the enzyme might play roles for both detoxifying, e.g., 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-butandiol and converting it to acetoacetyldehyde, dependent on the intracellular conditions: the latter reaction is catalyzed at lower rate, but may be facilitated if the subsequent enzyme in the pathway efficiently removes acetoacetaldehyde (an CoA-acylating aldehyde dehydrogenase [8, 9]). On the other hand, at times of 3-hydroxybutanal accumulation, it may reversibly be deposited as less toxic 1,3-butandiol (the equilibrium of this reaction is far on the side of the alcohol).

Conclusion

Clearly, more work lies ahead to reveal the unusual acetone activation pathway in D. biacutus, which is hampered by, e.g., the absence of molecular genetic methods for this bacterium, the unavailability of proposed intermediates for conducting appropriate enzyme tests, and by the extremely labile, oxygen-sensitive enzyme activities. However, in this study, we report the first heterologous overproduction of a functional protein from D. biacutus, exhibiting an aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase activity for a broad range of short- and medium chain aldehydes and ketones in vitro. The enzyme appears to be involved in acetone degradation by this bacterium, and its recombinant production may represent an important step in the elucidation of the complete degradation pathway.

Abbreviations

ADH: 

Aldehyde dehydrogenase

IPTG: 

Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside

MDR: 

Medium-chain dehydrogenase/reductase superfamily alcohol dehydrogenase

Ni-NTA: 

Nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid

PAGE: 

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Dominik Montag, Nicolai Müller, Ann-Katrin Felux and Antje Wiese for helpful discussions and technical support, Thomas Huhn and Fabian Schneider for chemical synthesis of substrates, and Andreas Marquardt for proteomic analyses.

Funding

This research and work of JF was funded by a Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grant within the Priority Program SPP 1319, and work of DS was supported by DFG grant SCHL 1936/4.

Availability of data and materials

All supporting data are presented in the main paper and the supplementary file. The genome annotation of Desulfococcus biacutus strain KMRActS and the nucleotide and amino-acid sequences of locus tag DebiaDRAFT_04514 are publicly available within the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system under IMG genome ID 2512047085; the genome sequencing and annotation has been described in ref. [9].

Authors’ contributions

JF, DS and BS conceived and designed the study. JF and HR carried out the analyses. JF wrote a first version of the manuscript, and all authors improved it. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Postbox 649, D-78457 Konstanz, Germany

References

  1. Platen H, Temmes A, Schink B. Anaerobic degradation of acetone by Desulfococcus biacutus spec. nov. Arch Microbiol. 1990;154(4):355–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Schühle K, Heider J. Acetone and butanone metabolism of the denitrifying bacterium “Aromatoleum aromaticum” demonstrates novel biochemical properties of an ATP-dependent aliphatic ketone carboxylase. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(1):131–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Heider J, Schühle K, Frey J, Schink B. Activation of acetone and other simple ketones in anaerobic bacteria. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;26(1–3):152–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyd JM, Ensign SA. ATP-dependent enolization of acetone by acetone carboxylase from Rhodobacter capsulatus. Biochemistry. 2005;44(23):8543–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dullius CH, Chen C-Y, Schink B. Nitrate-dependent degradation of acetone by Alicycliphilus and Paracoccus strains and comparison of acetone carboxylase enzymes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(19):6821–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Sluis MK, Ensign SA. Purification and characterization of acetone carboxylase from Xanthobacter strain Py2. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1997;94(16):8456–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Janssen PH, Schink B. Catabolic and anabolic enzyme activities and energetics of acetone metabolism of the sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfococcus biacutus. J Bacteriol. 1995a;177(2):277–282.Google Scholar
  8. Gutiérrez Acosta OB, Hardt N, Schink B. Carbonylation as a key reaction in anaerobic acetone activation by Desulfococcus biacutus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(20):6228–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Gutiérrez Acosta OB, Schleheck D, Schink B. Acetone utilization by sulfate-reducing bacteria: draft genome sequence of Desulfococcus biacutus and a proteomic survey of acetone-inducible proteins. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:584.Google Scholar
  10. Williamson VM, Paquin CE. Homology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH4 to an iron-activated alcohol dehydrogenase from Zymomonas mobilis. Mol Gene Genetics MGG. 1987;209(2):374–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Adolph HW, Maurer P, Schneider‐Bernlöhr H, Sartorius C, Zeppezauer M. Substrate specificity and stereoselectivity of horse liver alcohol dehydrogenase. Eur J Biochem. 1991;201(3):615–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ma K, Adams MW. An unusual oxygen-sensitive, iron-and zinc-containing alcohol dehydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(4):1163–70.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Neale AD, Scopes RK, Kelly JM, Wettenhall RE. The two alcohol dehydrogenases of Zymomonas mobilis. Eur J Biochem. 1986;154(1):119–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72(1):248–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227(5259):680–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ornstein L. Disc electrophoresis‐i background and theory. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964;121(2):321–49.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Neuhoff V, Arold N, Taube D, Ehrhardt W. Improved staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels including isoelectric focusing gels with clear background at nanogram sensitivity using Coomassie Brilliant Blue G‐250 and R‐250. Electrophoresis. 1988;9(6):255–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ziegenhorn J, Senn M, Bücher T. Molar absorptivities of beta-NADH and beta-NADPH. Clin Chem. 1976;22(2):151–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Eklund H, Ramaswamy S. Medium-and short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase gene and protein families. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65(24):3907–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Geer LY, Geer RC, He J, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, Lanczycki CJ, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang Z, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zheng C, Bryant SH. CDD: NCBI's conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D222–6.Google Scholar
  21. Persson B, Zigler JS, Jörnvall H. A super‐family of medium‐chain dehydrogenases/reductases (MDR). Eur J Biochem. 1994;226(1):15–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ismaiel AA, Zhu C, Colby G, Chen J-S. Purification and characterization of a primary-secondary alcohol dehydrogenase from two strains of Clostridium beijerinckii. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(16):5097–105.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Raedts J, Siemerink MA, Levisson M, van der Oost J, Kengen SW. Molecular characterization of an NADPH-dependent acetoin reductase/2, 3-butanediol dehydrogenase from Clostridium beijerinckii NCIMB 8052. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(6):2011–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Georgiou G, Valax P. Expression of correctly folded proteins in Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1996;7(2):190–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chowdhury EK, Nagata S, Misono H. 3-Hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas putida E23: purification and characterization. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1996;60(12):2043–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yamada-Onodera K, Fukui M, Tani Y. Purification and characterization of alcohol dehydrogenase reducing N-benzyl-3-pyrrolidinone from Geotrichum capitatum. J Biosci Bioeng. 2007;103(2):174–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson AR, Chen Y-W, Dekker EE. Investigation of a catalytic zinc binding site in Escherichia coli L-threonine dehydrogenase by site-directed mutagenesis of cysteine-38. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998;358(2):211–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ehrensberger AH, Elling RA, Wilson DK. Structure-guided engineering of xylitol dehydrogenase cosubstrate specificity. Structure. 2006;14(3):567–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rella R, Raia CA, Pensa M, Pisani FM, Gambacorta A, Rosa M, Rossi M. A novel archaebacterial NAD+‐dependent alcohol dehydrogenase. Eur J Biochem. 1987;167(3):475–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hensgens C, Vonck J, Van Beeumen J, Van Bruggen E, Hansen T. Purification and characterization of an oxygen-labile, NAD-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase from Desulfovibrio gigas. J Bacteriol. 1993;175(10):2859–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Jörnvall H, Persson B, Jeffery J. Characteristics of alcohol/polyol dehydrogenases. Eur J Biochem. 1987;167(2):195–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Korkhin Y, Kalb AJ, Peretz M, Bogin O, Burstein Y, Frolow F. NADP-dependent bacterial alcohol dehydrogenases: crystal structure, cofactor-binding and cofactor specificity of the ADHs of Clostridium beijerinckii and Thermoanaerobacter brockii. J Mol Biol. 1998;278(5):967–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Guy JE, Isupov MN, Littlechild JA. The structure of an alcohol dehydrogenase from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Aeropyrum pernix. J Mol Biol. 2003;331(5):1041–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gutiérrez Acosta OB, Hardt N, Hacker SM, Strittmatter T, Schink B, Marx A. Thiamine pyrophosphate stimulates acetone activation by Desulfococcus biacutus as monitored by a fluorogenic ATP analogue. ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9(6):1263–6.Google Scholar

Copyright

Advertisement