Skip to main content
Download PDF

Evidence for methionine-sulfoxide-reductase gene transfer from Alphaproteobacteria to the transcriptionally active (macro)nucleus of the ciliate, Euplotes raikovi

BMC Microbiology volume 14, Article number: 288 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Deleterious phenomena of protein oxidation affect every aerobic organism and methionine residues are their elective targets. The reduction of methionine sulfoxides back to methionines is catalyzed by methionine-sulfoxide reductases (Msrs), enzymes which are particularly active in microorganisms because of their unique nature of individual cells directly exposed to environmental oxidation.

Results

From the transcriptionally active somatic genome of a common free-living marine protist ciliate, Euplotes raikovi, we cloned multiple gene isoforms encoding Msr of type A (MsrA) committed to repair methionine-S-sulfoxides. One of these isoforms, in addition to including a MsrA-specific nucleotide sequence, included also a sequence specific for a Msr of type B (MsrB) committed to repair methionine-R-sulfoxides. Analyzed for its structural relationships with MsrA and MsrB coding sequences of other organisms, the coding region of this gene (named msrAB) showed much more significant relationships with Msr gene coding sequences of Rhodobacterales and Rhizobiales (Alphaproteobacteria), than of other eukaryotic organisms.

Conclusions

Based on the fact that the msrAB gene is delimited by Euplotes-specific regulatory 5’ and 3’ regions and telomeric C4A4/G4T4 repeats, it was concluded that E. raikovi inherited the coding region of this gene through a phenomenon of horizontal gene transfer from species of Alphaproteobacteria with which it coexists in nature and on which it likely feeds.

Background

Methionine residues of polypeptide chains are common targets of oxidation phenomena which alter conformation, sub-cellular localization, and aggregation state of proteins causing detrimental effects on vital cell functions and activities [1],[2]. Aerobic organisms thus urgently need to repair their methionine-oxidized proteins and their minimal gene sets systematically include Msr genes [3],[4].

Increasing concentrations of water-borne signaling proteins (pheromones), which Euplotes raikovi uses to promote its vegetative (mitotic) growth and the sexual phenomenon of conjugation [5], were observed to undergo oxidation in cause-effect relationships with cell ageing [6]. This oxidation hits the methionine residues that are more exposed on the surface of the pheromone molecular structure and was shown to cause remarkable modifications of protein activity [6], as is the case in other cell systems [2]. To shed light on the molecular mechanism evolved by E. raikovi to repair its methionine-oxidized pheromones, attention was focused on the Msr genes that are transcribed in the cell somatic nucleus (macronucleus) characterized by an eccentric sub-chromosomic organization in which individual, gene-size DNA molecules are replicated in thousands of copies fully autonomous for both replication and transcription [7].

Differently from the MsrB gene showing a single form, the gene specifying MsrA was found to be present in the E. raikovi macronucleus in multiple isoforms [8]. One isoform, designated as msrAB gene, is described here for its unique nucleotide sequence containing information for the synthesis of MsrA and MsrB proteins characterized by unequivocal structural relationships with MsrA and MsrB of Alphaproteobacteria.

Results and discussion

The msrAB gene cloning involved two PCR steps. A 231-bp MsrA-specific DNA fragment was first generated through amplification of total DNA preparations run with a combination of degenerate oligonucleotides (labeled #1 and 2 in Additional file 1: Table S1) specific to amino acid sequence stretches conserved in MsrA proteins of various organisms. In a second step, two nested PCR amplifications were run using primers (from #3 to #6 in Additional file 1: Table S1) specific to this DNA fragment in combination with a primer (#7 in Additional file 1: Table S1) specific to the C4A4/G4T4 repeats that are distinctive of the telomeric ends of every Euplotes macronuclear gene-size molecule [7]. Among four structurally distinct gene isoforms that were obtained, we reconstructed the full-length sequence of the longest isoform (1595bp) by overlapping the individual sequences. The reconstructed sequence was then confirmed by sequencing the amplification product of a PCR run with primers (#8 and 9 in Additional file 1: Table S1) specific to regions located close to its telomeric ends.

Instead of including a single open reading frame (ORF) like the other three gene isoforms (obtained incomplete at their 3’ regions), the 1595-bp isoform exceptionally included three potential ORFs (Figure1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Structure of the Euplotes raikovi msrAB gene. Nucleotide sequence: telomeric repetitions, italics; the 5’ and 3’ non-coding regions, lower case letters; coding regions, capital letters; in-frame TGA codons, underlined; ATG, TAA and TAG start and stop codons, shadowed. Deduced amino acid sequence: blue, green and red letters distinguish the putative proteins encoded by the three ORFs.

Full size image

The first ORF (ORF-1), spanning from ATG at position 763 to TAA at position 1269, matched the ORF of the three other gene sequences (Additional file 2: Figure S1). It encodes a 168-amino acid MsrA protein showing a much closer structural identity (79_90%) to MsrAs of Rhodobacterales, such as Thalassobacter (re-classified as Litoreibacter[9]) and Oceanicola, and Rhizobiales such as Sinorhizobium, than to any eukaryotic MsrA those of ciliates such as Tetrahymena and Paramecium included (Figure2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Sequence alignment of the Euplotes raikovi MsrA protein (red) encoded by ORF-1 of the msrAB gene with MsrAs of other organisms. MsrAs included in the alignment represent the best hits obtained from prokaryotic and eukaryotic BLASTp searches. Gaps were inserted to maximize alignment, and identical residues are highlighted in gray. Numbers in brackets indicate the percentage of sequence identity of each amino acid sequence with E. raikovi MsrA. Aligned sequences have the following GenBank ID: Thalassobacter arenae, WP_021102447; Sinorhizobium fredii, YP_006401320; Oceanicola sp., WP_010137233; Ruegeria lacuscaerulensis, WP_005979692; Rhizobium sp., WP_018236324; Sphingopyxis sp., WP_003045039; Roseibium sp., WP_009759924; Pelagibaca bermudensis, WP_007796742; Citreicella sp., WP_008887323; Nitratireductor aquibiodomus, WP_007008964; Pantholops hodgsonii, XP_005978873; Paramecium tetraurelia, XP_001431627; Tetrahymena thermophila, XP_001020577. Rhodobacterales, green; Rhizobiales, brown; Sphingomonadales, blue; eukaryotic organisms, black.

Full size image

The second ORF (ORF-2), spanning from ATG at position 305 to TAG at position 1150 and partially overlapping with ORF-1, includes (at the beginning of the overlapping region) an in-frame TGA codon which, however, is most likely not committed to stop translation. At least in principle, it should code for cysteine, or selenocysteine, so as TGA usually does in Euplotes[10]. The 152-amino acid N-terminal region of the 281-amino acid sequence encoded by this ORF shows significant relationships not with other MsrA proteins, but with bacterial MsrBs lacking Cys-Xxx-Xxx-Cys Zn-ion binding motifs [3],[4]. Its alignment is much closer (72_78% of structural identity) to MsrBs of Rhodobacterales such as Roseovarius, Roseobacter, Thalassobacter and Oceanicola, and Rhizobiales such as Sinorhizobium and Rhizobium, than to any eukaryotic MsrB including the MsrB of E. raikovi itself (Figure3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Sequence alignment of the 153-amino acid N-terminal region of the Euplotes raikovi MsrB protein (red) encoded by ORF-2 of the msrAB gene with MsrBs of other organisms. The MsrBs included in the alignment represent the best hits obtained from prokaryotic and eukaryotic BLASTp searches. Gaps were inserted to maximize alignment, and identical residues are highlighted in gray. Numbers in brackets indicate the percentage of sequence identity of each amino acid sequence with E. raikovi MsrB. Aligned sequences have the following GenBank ID: Roseovarius nubinhibens, WP_009814088; Roseobacter sp., WP_007811995; Sinorhizobium meliloti, WP_018098563; Rhizobium sp., WP_018236325; Nitratireductor aquibiodomus, WP_007008963; Thalassobacter arenae, WP_021102446; Sphingopyxis sp., WP_003044951; Oceanicola granulosus, WP_007254905; Roseibium sp., WP_009759925; Mesorhizobium alhagi, WP_008840482; Ruegeria conchae, WP_010442903; Pantholops hodgsonii mitochondrial-like, XP_005955290; Euplotes raikovi, AFZ61875; Paramecium tetraurelia, XP_001426263; Tetrahymena thermophila, XP_001019714. Rhodobacterales, green; Rhizobiales, brown; Sphingomonadales, blue; eukaryotic organisms, black.

Full size image

The third ORF (ORF-3), spanning from ATG at position 78 to TAA at position 305 and containing another in-frame TGA, encodes a 75-amino acid protein not related to Msr proteins. Its 40-amino acid N-terminal segment is 55_60% identical to the C-terminal sequence of the LysR-type transcription regulator of Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, and Sphingopyxis. In addition to being strongly conserved among Rhizobiales and Sphingomonadales [11],[12], this regulatory protein is known to be determined by genes carried by DNA regions destined to be transferred from one to another bacterial genome [11].

To obtain evidence that the msrAB gene is a functional and effectively expressed gene, cDNA preparations were obtained from cells previously induced to increase their anti-oxidative enzyme synthesis by a mild oxidative stress (generated by a 30-min suspension with 300-μM H2O2 concentration), and subjected to PCR amplification with primer combinations specific to each ORF (Additional file 3: Figure S2). Two MsrA-specific 368-bp and 660-bp products were obtained, indicating that ORF-1 is either the only one to be expressed, or is expressed to a much higher extent than the other two ORFs.

The bacterial origin of the three ORFs of the E. raikovi macronuclear msrAB gene is well explained by a comparative analysis with the organization of the MsrA, MsrB, and transcription-regulator gene sequences in Thalassobacter arenae, Sinorhizobium meliloti and Sphingopyxis alaskensis genomes [13]-[18]. In all these Alphaproteobacteria, the MsrB and MsrA coding genes lie adjacent to one another and the TGA stop codon of the MsrB coding region partially overlaps (T. arenae), or is separated by none (S. meliloti), or only two nucleotides (S. alaskensis) from the ATG start codon of the MsrA coding region (Figure4 and Additional file 4: Figures S3-S5). In addition, in T. arenae and S. alaskensis the transcription-activator gene is located apart from the Msr coding genes [13],[18]. In S. meliloti, instead, the distance is only 114-bp from the ATG of the MsrB coding region [14] and the MsrA/MsrB/transcription-activator gene cluster does not lie in the chromosome, but in one of the two symbiotic mega-plasmids (or chromids) [14]-[17].

Figure 4
figure 4

Comparative structural analysis of the Euplotes raikovi msrAB gene with the MsrA and MsrB coding genes of Thalassobacter arenae , Sinorhizobium meliloti , and Sphingopyxis alaskensis. ORFs are represented by arrows pointing to the direction of transcription and extending between the indicated nucleotide positions. Red, green and blue colors highlight MsrA, MsrB and LysR-transcription regulator ORF, respectively. Gray and black bars indicate regions of bacterial genes with 70 and 73-75% of nucleotide sequence identity with msrAB gene, respectively (see also Additional file 4: Figures S3-S5). Inter-ORF bars indicate non-coding regions and their relative extensions, while the filled boxes in the msrAB gene indicate the telomeric ends. T. arenae, S. meliloti and S. alaskensis sequence GenBank accession numbers are GCA_000442275.1, CP003936.1 and CP000356.1, respectively.

Full size image

Conclusions

Genome analysis from a large variety of pro- and eukaryotes indicates that gene transfer among the three domains of life is a recurrent phenomenon in biological evolution. It also suggests that eukaryotic genomes preferentially retain those prokaryotic genes which encode enzymes capable of conferring adaptive and evolutionary advantages [19]-[21]. The finding that E. raikovi uses Msrs from Alphaproteobacteria to repair methionine-oxidized proteins supports these concepts, and implies that ciliates in general expand their genetic resources from the acquisition of bacterial gene sequences.

The pervasive tendency of Euplotes species to host endosymbiotic bacteria in their cytoplasm [22], and the fact that Rhizobiales include numerous symbiotic species [23] would suggest that the origin of the msrAB coding sequence lies in some Sinorhizobium species living as endosymbionts in E. raikovi. However, present-day stable cytoplasmic hosts of E. raikovi appear to be Gammaproteobacteria, in primis Francisella endociliophora[24],[25], which have Msr genes with sequences markedly different from those of the E. raikovi msrAB coding sequences (personal communication from Dr. Andreas Sjdin, CBRN Defence and Security Department, Swedish Defence Research Agency, Ume).

An alternative hypothesis accounting for the origin of the msrAB gene is suggested by the Doolittles aphorism you are what you eat [26]. It considers that the origin of the msrAB gene resides in some Rhodobacterales or Rhizobiales species that are usually ingested as food by E. raikovi. Molecular investigations and cultivation-based studies have consistently revealed that both Rhodobacterales of the so-called marine alpha group and Rhizobiales of the genus Rhizobium are cosmopolitan and dominant members of microbial communities in marine sediments [27]-[31]. Furthermore, they contribute to the Mediterranean subsurface microbial community of which E. raikovi is a common member [32].

Methods

Cell cultures

Euplotes raikovi cultures used in this study derive from the wild-type strain #13 deposited at the ATCC Center (catalog, #PRA-327), and collected (June 1979) from a sandy coastal site (Porto Recanati, 43 26’N, 13 43’E) of the Adriatic cost of Italy [32]. They were fed on green algae, Dunaliella tertiolecta, grown in pasteurized natural seawater enriched with Walne medium.

DNA purification and amplification

Total DNA preparations were obtained, according to a published procedure [33], from cultures deprived of food for 34 days and concentrated by centrifugation (2500 x g, for 5min). Degenerate primers were designed with the CODEHOP (Consensus-Degenerate Hybrid Oligonucleotide Primers) method [34] on the basis of the following two MsrA conserved sequence stretches: Leu-Ala-Gly-Gly-Cys-Phe-Trp and His-Asp-Pro-Thr-Thr-Leu-Asn-Arg-Gln-Gly. All the PCR amplifications were run in an Eppendorf Mastercycler (Eppendorf, AG, Hamburg, Germany), using 0.5-μg DNA aliquots as template in 50 μl-reaction mixtures containing 0.25 μM of each primer, 0.3mM dNTP, 1x buffer, and 1U of Perfect-Taq DNA Polymerase (Eppendorf). After an initial DNA denaturation step at 95C for 4min, 35cycles of 95C for 30sec, 58C for 40sec, and 72C for 1min were run. A final incubation step, at 72C for 7min, was added to the last cycle. Gel-purified PCR products were ligated into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega, WI) and transformed into TOPO 10 cells (Invitrogen, Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Colonies were selected for PCR amplification to screen the presence of inserts using standard M13 primers and the products were sequenced at the BMR Genomics Center of the University of Padua.

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis

RNA was extracted from cells incubated with H2O2 (300 μM), for 30min, harvested by centrifugation, and lysed in Trizol reagent (Ambion, Life Technologies Corporation, Carlsbad, CA, USA). It was then purified with the PureLink RNA mini kit (Ambion) following the procedure described by the manufacturer, and digested with RNAse-free DNAse I to remove contaminating DNA. Single-stranded cDNA was synthesized following the 3’ RACE protocol of the FirstChoice RLM-RACE kit (Ambion) and 50ng-aliquots were next used in PCR analysis.

Sequence analysis and accession number

BLAST analysis (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) and ClustalW (http://www.genome.jp/tools/clustalw) were used to search for the nearest relative sequences and perform multiple sequence alignments, respectively. The msrAB sequence has been deposited to GenBank under the accession number KM197136.

Authors contributions

ND and AV conceived the study. PL prepared the biological material for the experiments. ND, AC and FR carried out the experiments. AV analyzed the data. AV and PL wrote the manuscript. All the authors have read the article and approved the final manuscript.

Additional files

References

  1. Friguet B: Oxidized protein degradation and repair in ageing and oxidative stress. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580: 2910-2916. 10.1016/j.febslet.2006.03.028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stadtman ER, Moskovitz J, Levine RL: Oxidation of methionine residues of proteins: biological consequences. Antioxi Redox Sign. 2003, 5: 577-582. 10.1089/152308603770310239.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Delaye L, Becerra A, Orgel L, Lazcano A: Molecular evolution of peptide methionine sulfoxide reductases (MsrA and MsrB): on the early development of a mechanism that protects against oxidative damage. J Mol Evol. 2007, 64: 15-32. 10.1007/s00239-005-0281-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang XH, Weissbach H: Origin and evolution of the protein-repairing enzymes methionine sulphoxide reductases. Biol Rev. 2008, 83: 249-257. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2008.00042.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vallesi A, Giuli G, Bradshaw RA, Luporini P: Autocrine mitogenic activity of pheromones produced by the protozoan ciliate Euplotes raikovi. Nature. 1995, 376: 522-524. 10.1038/376522a0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alimenti C, Vallesi A, Luporini P, Buonanno F, Ortenzi C: Cell aging-induced methionine oxidation causes an autocrine to paracrine shift of the pheromone activity in the protozoan ciliate, Euplotes raikovi. Exp Cell Res. 2012, 318: 144-151. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2011.10.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jahn CL, Klobutcher LA: Genome remodeling in ciliated protozoa. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002, 56: 489-520. 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160916.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobri N, Oumarou EE, Alimenti C, Ortenzi C, Luporini P, Vallesi A: Methionine sulfoxide reduction in ciliates: characterization of the ready-to-use methionine sulfoxide-R-reductase genes in Euplotes. Gene. 2013, 515: 110-116. 10.1016/j.gene.2012.11.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim YO, Park S, Nam BH, Kang SJ, Hur YB, Kim DG, Oh TK, Yoon JH: Description of Litoreibacter meonggei sp. nov., isolated from the sea squirt Halocynthia roretzi, reclassification of Thalassobacter arenae as Litoreibacter arenae comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Litoreibacter Romanenko et al. 2011. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012, 62: 1825-1831. 10.1099/ijs.0.035113-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Turanov AA, Lobanov AV, Formenko DE, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Klobutcher LA, Hatfield DL, Gladyshev VN: Genetic code supports targeted insertion of two amino acids by one codon. Science. 2009, 323: 259-261. 10.1126/science.1164748.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Prez-Rueda E, Collado-Vides J: Common history at the origin of the position-function correlation in transcriptional regulators in archaea and bacteria. J Mol Evol. 2001, 53: 172-179. 10.1007/s002390010207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maddocks SE, Oyston PCF: Structure and function of the LysR-type transcriptional regulator (LTTR) family proteins. Microbiology. 2008, 154: 3609-3623. 10.1099/mic.0.2008/022772-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Riedel T, Fiebig A, Petersen J, Gronow S, Kyrpides NC, Gker M, Klenk HP: Genome sequence of the Litoreibacter arenae type strain (DSM 19593T), a member of the Roseobacter clade isolated from sea sand. Stand Genomic Sci. 2013, 9: 117-127. 10.4056/sigs.4258318.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Galardini M, Mengoni A, Brilli M, Pini F, Fioravanti A, Lucas S, Lapidus A, Cheng JF, Goodwin L, Pitluk S, Land M, Hauser L, Woyke T, Mikhailova N, Ivanova N, Daligault H, Bruce D, Detter C, Tapia R, Han C, Teshima H, Mocali S, Bazzicalupo M, Biondi EG: Exploring the symbiotic pangenome of the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Sinorhizobium meliloti. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 235-10.1186/1471-2164-12-235.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barnett MJ, Fisher RF, Jones T, Komp C, Abola AP, Barloy-Hubler F, Bowser L, Capela D, Galibert F, Gouzy J, Gurjal M, Hong A, Huizar L, Hyman RW, Kahn D, Kahn ML, Kalman S, Keating DH, Palm C, Peck MC, Surzycki R, Wells DH, Yeh KC, Davis RW, Federspiel NA, Long SR: Nucleotide sequence and predicted functions of the entire Sinorhizobium meliloti pSymA megaplasmid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98: 9883-9888. 10.1073/pnas.161294798.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Galardini M, Pini F, Bazzicalupo M, Biondi EG, Mengoni A: Replicon-dependent bacterial genome evolution: the case of Sinorhizobium meliloti. Genome Biol Evol. 2013, 5: 542-558. 10.1093/gbe/evt027.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martnez-Abarca F, Martnez-Rodrguez L, Lpez-Contreras JA, Jimnez-Zurdo JI, Toro N: Complete genome sequence of the alfalfa symbiont Sinorhizobium/Ensifer meliloti strain GR4. Genome Announc. 2013, 1: e00174-12. 10.1128/genomeA.00174-12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lauro FM, McDougald D, Thomas T, Williams TJ, Egan S, Rice S, DeMaere MZ, Ting L, Ertan H, Johnson J, Ferriera S, Lapidus A, Anderson I, Kyrpides N, Munk AC, Detter C, Hang CS, Brown MV, Robb FT, Kjelleberg S, Cavicchioli R: The genomic basis of trophic strategy in marine bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009, 106: 15527-15533. 10.1073/pnas.0903507106.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rocha EPC: With a little help from Prokaryotes. Science. 2013, 339: 1154-1155. 10.1126/science.1234938.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Keeling PJ, Palmer JD: Horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotic evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2008, 9: 605-618. 10.1038/nrg2386.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Keeling PJ: Functional and ecological impacts of horizontal gene transfer in eukaryotes. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009, 19: 613-619. 10.1016/j.gde.2009.10.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grtz HD: Intracellular bacteria in ciliates. Int Microbiol. 2001, 4: 143-150.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Engelhardt T, Sahlberg M, Cypionka H, Engelen B: Biogeography of Rhizobium radiobacter and distribution of associated temperate phages in deep subseafloor sediments. ISME J. 2013, 7: 199-209. 10.1038/ismej.2012.92.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schrallhammer M, Schweikert M, Vallesi A, Verni F, Petroni G: Detection of a novel subspecies of Francisella noatunensis as endosymbiont of the ciliate Euplotes raikovi. Microb Ecol. 2011, 61: 455-464. 10.1007/s00248-010-9772-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sjdin A, hrman C, Bckman S, Lrkeryd A, Granberg M, Lundmark E, Karlsson E, Nilsson E, Vallesi A, Tellgren-Roth C, Stenberg P, Thelaus J: Complete genome sequence of Francisella endociliophora strain FSC1006, isolated from a laboratory culture of the marine ciliate Euplotes raikovi. Genome Announc 2014, 2:e0122714.,

  26. Doolittle WF: You are what you eat: a gene transfer ratchet could account for bacterial genes in eukaryotic nuclear genomes. Trends Genet. 1998, 14: 307-311. 10.1016/S0168-9525(98)01494-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gonzlez JM, Moran MA: Numerical dominance of a group of marine bacteria in the α-subclass of the class Proteobacteria in coastal seawater. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63: 4237-4242.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Macin MC, Arahal DR, Garay E, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH, Pujalte MJ:Thalassobacter stenotrophicus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel marine α-proteobacterium isolated from Mediterranean sea water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005, 55: 105-110. 10.1099/ijs.0.63275-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dang H, Li T, Chen M, Huang G: Cross-ocean distribution of Rhodobacterales bacteria as primary surface colonizers in temperate coastal marine waters. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008, 74: 52-60. 10.1128/AEM.01400-07.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. DHondt S, Jrgensen BB, Miller DJ, Batzke A, Blake R, Cragg BA, Cypionka H, Dickens GR, Ferdelman T, Hinrichs KU, Holm NG, Mitterer R, Spivack A, Wang G, Bekins B, Engelen B, Ford K, Gettemy G, Rutherford SD, Sass H, Skilbeck CG, Aiello IW, Gurin G, House CH, Inagaki F, Meister P, Naehr T, Niitsuma S, Parkes RJ, Schippers A: Distributions of microbial activities in deep subseafloor sediments. Science. 2004, 306: 2216-2221. 10.1126/science.1101155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sss J, Schubert K, Sass H, Cypionka H, Overmann J, Engelen B: Widespread distribution and high abundance of Rhizobium radiobacter within Mediterranean subsurface sediments. Environ Microbiol. 2006, 8: 1753-1763. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01058.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Miceli C, Luporini P, Bracchi P: Morphological description, breeding system, and nuclear changes during conjugation of Euplotes raikovi Agamaliev from Mediterranean Sea. Acta Protozool. 1981, 20: 215-224.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Vallesi A, Di Pretoro B, Ballarini P, Apone F, Luporini P: A novel protein kinase from the ciliate Euplotes raikovi with close structural identity to the mammalian intestinal and male-germ cell kinases: characterization and functional implications in the autocrine pheromone signaling loop. Protist. 2010, 161: 250-263. 10.1016/j.protis.2009.12.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rose TM, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S: CODEHOP (COnsensus-DEgenerate Hybrid Oligonucleotide Primer) PCR primer design. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3763-3766. 10.1093/nar/gkg524.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Ministero dellIstruzione, Universit e Ricerca (PRIN research projects). Expert advice of Dr. Martha Dunbar for the language revision of the text is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Eukaryotic Microbiology and Animal Biology, School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, Camerino, MC, 62032, Italy

    Nicoleta Dobri, Annalisa Candelori, Francesca Ricci, Pierangelo Luporini & Adriana Vallesi

Authors
  1. Nicoleta Dobri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annalisa Candelori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesca Ricci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pierangelo Luporini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Adriana Vallesi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriana Vallesi.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional file 1: Table S1.: PCR primer numbers, denominations, and sequences. (PDF 75 KB)

12866_2014_288_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Additional file 2: Figure S1.: Nucleotide (a) and amino acid (b) sequence alignments of the three E. raikovi MsrA gene isoforms obtained (incomplete at the 3’ regions) together with the mrsAB gene. (PDF 86 KB)

12866_2014_288_MOESM3_ESM.pdf

Additional file 3: Figure S2.:(a) Schematic representation of the msrAB gene showing the relative positions of the three ORFs and PCR primers used for assessing the expression of each ORF. (b) Agarose-gel separation of PCR products obtained from cDNA amplifications run with the indicated primer combinations. (PDF 149 KB)

12866_2014_288_MOESM4_ESM.pdf

Additional file 4: Figure S3.: Nucleotide sequence alignment between E. raikovi msrAB gene (from nucleotide 305 to nucleotide 1,268) and Thalassobacter arenae chromosome (from nucleotide 543,304 to nucleotide 544,253). Figure S4. Nucleotide sequence alignment between E. raikovi msrAB gene (telomeric C4A4-G4T4 repeats excluded) and Sinorhizobium meliloti plasmid pRmeGR4c (from nucleotide 344,364 to nucleotide 345,900, complement sequence). Figure S5. Nucleotide sequence alignment between E. raikovi msrAB gene (from nucleotide 305 to nucleotide 1,280) and Sphingopyxix alaskensis chromosome (from nucleotide 121,993 to nucleotide 122,954). (PDF 106 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dobri, N., Candelori, A., Ricci, F. et al. Evidence for methionine-sulfoxide-reductase gene transfer from Alphaproteobacteria to the transcriptionally active (macro)nucleus of the ciliate, Euplotes raikovi . BMC Microbiol 14, 288 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0288-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0288-1

Keywords

  • Horizontal gene transfer
  • Protozoa
  • Alphaproteobacteria
  • Gene structure
  • Methionine sulfoxide reductases

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us