Skip to main content

Advertisement

We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Gene expression analysis of the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum in the presence of tomato plants, chitin, or glucose using a high-density oligonucleotide microarray

  • †1,
  • †2,
  • 3,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 4Email author
†Contributed equally
BMC Microbiology20099:217

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-217

©  Samolski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

  • Received: 13 May 2009
  • Accepted: 13 October 2009
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

It has recently been shown that the Trichoderma fungal species used for biocontrol of plant diseases are capable of interacting with plant roots directly, behaving as symbiotic microorganisms. With a view to providing further information at transcriptomic level about the early response of Trichoderma to a host plant, we developed a high-density oligonucleotide (HDO) microarray encompassing 14,081 Expressed Sequence Tag (EST)-based transcripts from eight Trichoderma spp. and 9,121 genome-derived transcripts of T. reesei, and we have used this microarray to examine the gene expression of T. harzianum either alone or in the presence of tomato plants, chitin, or glucose.

Results

Global microarray analysis revealed 1,617 probe sets showing differential expression in T. harzianum mycelia under at least one of the culture conditions tested as compared with one another. Hierarchical clustering and heat map representation showed that the expression patterns obtained in glucose medium clustered separately from the expression patterns observed in the presence of tomato plants and chitin. Annotations using the Blast2GO suite identified 85 of the 257 transcripts whose probe sets afforded up-regulated expression in response to tomato plants. Some of these transcripts were predicted to encode proteins related to Trichoderma-host (fungus or plant) associations, such as Sm1/Elp1 protein, proteases P6281 and PRA1, enchochitinase CHIT42, or QID74 protein, although previously uncharacterized genes were also identified, including those responsible for the possible biosynthesis of nitric oxide, xenobiotic detoxification, mycelium development, or those related to the formation of infection structures in plant tissues.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of the Trichoderma HDO microarray to detect different gene responses under different growth conditions in the fungus T. harzianum strongly indicates that this tool should be useful for further assays that include different stages of plant colonization, as well as for expression studies in other Trichoderma spp. represented on it. Using this microarray, we have been able to define a number of genes probably involved in the transcriptional response of T. harzianum within the first hours of contact with tomato plant roots, which may provide new insights into the mechanisms and roles of this fungus in the Trichoderma-plant interaction.

Keywords

  • Chitin
  • Tomato Plant
  • Transcript Sequence
  • Trichoderma Strain
  • Biocontrol Strain

Background

The ability of some fungal species of the genus Trichoderma to suppress disease and stimulate the growth and development of plants explains the wide and long-term use of these organisms in many crops [1]. Traditionally, the beneficial effects of Trichoderma spp. on plants have been attributed to their capability to antagonize soil-borne pathogens by a combination of mycoparasitism, secretion of antibiotics, and competition for space and substrates [2]. However, subsequent discoveries have demonstrated that these biocontrol agents are also able to interact intimately with plant roots, even colonizing the outer epidermis layers, and to act as opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts [3]. Currently, it is known that the root colonization by Trichoderma spp. produces changes in plant metabolism that can lead to increased root development, crop productivity, and resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses [4].

In recent years, increased attention has been paid to studying the direct interactions occurring between Trichoderma spp. and plants, including molecular studies of specific bioactive components produced by the fungal partner that have been associated with plant defence mechanism elicitation, root colonization, or plant growth promotion [5–12]. Novel genomic and proteomic techniques are also now being implemented to Trichoderma biocontrol species with the aim of identifying large-scale molecular factors involved in the communication between Trichoderma and plants. Macroarray analyses have been applied to study the gene expression of four species of Trichoderma during their interaction with cacao seedlings [13], and of T. harzianum during the early colonization of tomato roots [14]. There is also a study based on a three-way interaction system (bean plant-pathogen-T. atroviride) that used a proteomic approach to identify differential proteins produced by each of the three organisms involved in that association [15]. Apart from this, several recent works on plant-Trichoderma interactions have been conducted to explore the molecular responses of plants to the presence of a root-colonizing Trichoderma strain, using either transcriptomic [16] or proteomic methods [17, 18].

Microarray analyses are becoming a powerful tool for large-scale gene expression studies in filamentous fungi [19]. However, transcriptomic analyses of Trichoderma biocontrol species using this technology have been hampered by the scant sequencing conducted on these fungi. In fact, the first analysis of the genome sequence of a Trichoderma strain (T. reesei QM 6a) has been recently published [20], although this sequence has been publicly available for a few years. Fortunately, the first version of the complete genome from two other Trichoderma species, the biocontrol agents T. virens Gv29-8 and T. atroviride IMI 206040, is now available on-line [21, 22]. Since the complete genomes of other Trichoderma biocontrol species are not available and nor will they be in the near future, in this work we focused our efforts on developing a customized high-density oligonucleotide (HDO) microarray from a large Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) collection, which was generated in a previous EU-funded project called "TrichoEST" [23–25]. This project has provided a fundamental resource for transcriptomic analyses in Trichoderma spp. through the sequencing of more than 25,000 ESTs from eight different species representing the biodiversity of this genus: T. harzianum, T. atroviride, T. asperellum, T. viride, T. longibrachiatum, T. virens, T. stromaticum and T. aggresivum. Specifically, these ESTs were obtained from 28 cDNA libraries under a wide range of growth conditions, including biocontrol-related conditions and different nutritional situations [23–25].

The aim of the present study was to explore transcriptomic changes in the biocontrol strain T. harzianum CECT 2413 in its early interactions with tomato plant roots using microarray technology. We report the construction of a Trichoderma HDO microarray composed of 384,659 25-mer probes designed against 14,081 EST-derived transcripts from twelve strains belonging to the eight Trichoderma species cited above, and 9,121 genome-derived transcripts from T. reseei [20], since it was the only entire Trichoderma genome available when the microarray was designed. As far as we know, this is the first time that an oligonucleotide microarray has been used to study gene expression changes of a Trichoderma strain in the presence of a plant host. RNAs from T. harzianum CECT 2413 mycelia cultured in the presence and absence of tomato plants and also in glucose- or chitin-containing media were hybridized to the Trichoderma HDO microarray proposed in this work.

Results

Trichoderma HDO microarray design

The probe selection process conducted as described in Methods yielded a total of 384,659 different probes [GEO accession number: GPL7702] that were included on our custom-designed Trichoderma HDO microarray. After mapping these individual probes to the initial collections of EST-derived transcripts of twelve Trichoderma strains and genome-derived transcripts of T. reesei, from which the probes were designed, it was found that approximately 35% of the probes on the chip matched transcripts from Trichoderma spp. and about 65% matched transcripts from T. reesei, which was consistent with the size in base-pairs of each of the two sequence collections (7.1 and 13.9 Mbp, respectively). Moreover, 1.5% of the probes on the chip could be mapped to sequences from both databases. The number of probes associated with each particular transcript sequence (probe set size) ranged from 1 to 94 for Trichoderma spp. transcripts, and from 1 to 1,245 for T. reesei transcripts, with a median value of 16 and 22, respectively, and a maximum of approximately 40 nt between adjacent probes (data not shown). The final composition of the microarray in terms of the number of transcript sequences of each Trichoderma strain represented by a probe set is shown in Figure 1. In all, of the original 14,237 EST-derived sequences of Trichoderma spp. and 9,129 genome-derived sequences of T. reesei, only 156 (1,1%) and 8 (0.1%), respectively, were not represented on the microarray since no probe passed the selection procedure (the identification codes of the excluded sequences are available as supplementary material in additional file 1).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Trichoderma HDO microarray composition. Number of gene transcripts of Trichoderma spp. (EST-derived) and T. reesei (genome-derived) represented on the Trichoderma HDO microarray generated in the present work.

Overview of expression data in T. harzianum from microarray analysis

Trichoderma HDO microarrays were hybridized with cDNA obtained from T. harzianum CECT 2413 after 9 h of culture in the presence of tomato plants (MS-P medium), chitin (MS-Ch medium), glucose (MS-G medium), or MS basal medium (control condition). From the fluorescence intensities processed as described in Methods, a multi-class SAM test identified a total of 1,617 probe sets (7.0% of the total on the microarray) revealing significant expression changes (FDR = 0.23) between any of the culture conditions under study. Of these probe sets, about 51% had been generated from transcript sequences of T. harzianum CECT 2413, and the remaining 49% from transcript sequences of other strains of Trichoderma, including 12% of the probe sets from T. reesei. The expression data obtained and the identification codes of the corresponding transcript sequences are available as supplementary material in additional file 2. More specifically, we observed that the majority (1,220) of the detected probe sets exhibited a more than two-fold expression change (up- or down-) in one or more culture conditions as compared with the control condition (MS). In particular, 596, 254 and 865 probe sets displayed expression levels at least two-fold higher or lower in MS-P, MS-Ch and MS-G, respectively, than in MS (Figure 2A). In order to determine probe sets specifically related to the presence of tomato plants, we compared those that were common and those that were not common to each culture condition (Figure 2B). Regarding the probe sets reflecting a two-fold higher expression in the presence of tomato plants (MS-P) than in MS, 95 of them (56+11+28) were also found in MS-G and/or MS-Ch, resulting in 162 probe sets (20% of the total up-regulated under the three conditions tested) that were unique to MS-P. Among the probe sets displaying a two-fold lower expression in MS-P than in MS, 110 (37+2+71) were shared with other culture conditions and 229 (35% of the total down-regulated in the three conditions tested) were unique to MS-P.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Global expression data in T. harzianum from microarray analysis. (A) Number of probe sets on the Trichoderma HDO microarray showing significant expression changes (up- or down-) in T. harzianum CECT 2413 in response to the presence of tomato plants (MS-P), chitin (MS-Ch) or glucose (MS-G) in the culture medium in comparison to the basal medium alone (MS). (B) Venn diagrams representing those probe sets that were common and distinct in each culture condition (processed microarray expression data are available in additional file 2).

To gain a general view of the expression data obtained in these microarray experiments, we generated a heat map from the 1,220 probe sets that showed two-fold expression changes in at least one experimental condition vs. the MS control condition. Hierarchical clustering was carried out using Kendall's tau test and Ward's clustering algorithm since this method resulted in the best resolution of two distinct main clusters, I and II, illustrating different expression patterns (Figure 3). As shown in Figure 3, the two biological replicates of each experimental condition were clustered together. Globally, the majority of the probe sets in the heat map would correspond to genes that are up-regulated by glucose (cluster II, dark red colour) and relatively weakly induced or repressed in the presence of tomato plants and/or chitin (cluster II, light red/green colour). In contrast, probe sets in subclusters Ia and Ib would represent genes that are down-regulated in the presence of glucose but up-regulated in response to tomato plants (mainly in subcluster Ia) or chitin (mainly in cluster Ib). Finally, a subcluster Ic would comprise genes induced by tomato plants and to a certain extent by glucose.
Figure 3
Figure 3

Heat map representing expression profiles of T. harzianum determined by microarray analysis. A total of 1,220 probe sets showing at least two-fold regulation in response to the presence of tomato plants (MS-P), chitin (MS-Ch) or glucose (MS-G) in the culture medium in comparison to the basal medium alone (MS) were selected for hierarchical clustering. Two biological replicates (1 and 2) from triplicate cultures were used in each experimental condition. Probe sets and samples were ordered using Kendall's tau test and the Ward clustering algorithm through the R software. For each row, the mean expression value in the control condition (MS) was calculated and subtracted from the expression value in the rest of conditions. The red and the green colours represent positive and negative expression changes, respectively, vs. the control condition. The intensity of the colour is proportional to the magnitude of the differential expression. Detailed expression profiles corresponding to the pra 1, pra 2 (former p7480), prb 1 (former p10261), and prb 2 (former p8048) genes are displayed to the right of the figure (results from different probe sets/ESTs representing the same gene are shown independently).

As internal controls of the expression data obtained and the cluster analysis, we searched for probe sets representing genes of T. harzianum CECT 2413, such as those coding for trypsins -PRA1 [EMBL: AJ249721] and P7480 (here referred to as PRA2) [EMBL: AM294977]- and subtilisins -P10261 (here referred to as PRB1) [EMBL: AM294980] and P8048 (here referred to as PRB2) [EMBL: AM294978]-, which have been reported to be strongly induced by chitin and repressed by glucose at short-term [26]. As expected, all six probe sets associated with these genes were located in subcluster Ib and yielded expression profiles (Figure 3) consistent with those published previously. Additionally, from the microarray data it was found that these genes exhibited a relatively low level of expression when the fungus was cultured in the presence of tomato plants as compared to that observed when it was cultured in chitin-containing medium. This was also supported by Northern blot analyses carried out for the trypsin PRA1 and subtilisin PRB1 genes. As shown in Figure 4, the transcription of pra1 was only weakly triggered in MS-P, whereas the transcript levels of prb1 were not even detectable under this condition.
Figure 4
Figure 4

Expression profiles of five known genes of T. harzianum determined by Northern blot hybridization. The fungus was cultured in MS basal medium alone or in the presence of tomato plants (MS-P), 2% glucose (MS-G), or 1% chitin (MS-Ch), as described in Methods. Fungal 18S rDNA was used as a loading control.

Identification of T. harzianum genes expressed in response to tomato plants

Since we were interested in identifying the genes induced in T. harzianum CECT 2413 by the presence of tomato plants, we selected the 257 probe sets affording significant differential expression in MS-P vs. MS (fold-change greater than 2.0 and FDR = 0.23; see additional file 3), and the corresponding transcript sequences were annotated according to the GO classification and the hierarchical structure using the Blast2GO suite [27]. GO categories were assigned to 85 of the 257 sequences examined (see additional file 4) whereas another 57 had no results after mapping or annotation processes (many of them were hypothetical proteins), and the remaining 115 sequences did not yield significant hits in the databases. As summarized in additional file 5, the annotated sequences represented a total of 46 different genes. Additionally, three sequences without Blast2GO annotation (T34C26, T34C242 and L10T34P112R10010) but corresponding to three portions of the known protein QID74 [Prot: O74567] of T. harzianum CECT 2413 were also included in additional file 5.

Within the genes identified as showing up-regulation in MS-P vs. MS, about 45% were genes encoding homologues of proteins involved in metabolic pathways, mainly enzymes for carbohydrate, lipid and amino acid metabolism, but also enzymes for vitamin and cofactor biosynthesis, and energy- and detoxification- related processes. Interestingly, some of these up-regulated genes (encoding O-glycosyl hydrolase family 2, aldose 1-epimerase, dihydroxyacetone kinase, acid sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase, GTP cyclohydrolase I, glutathione-dependent formaldehyde-activating enzyme, plus two hypothetical proteins) were classified according to Blast2GO in the functional category "growth or development of symbiont on or near host surface" since their homologues in Magnaporte grisea were differentially expressed during appresorium formation [28]. Proteins related to carbohydrate metabolism included several enzymes of the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis pathways plus a phosphoketolase of the pentose phosphate pathway, and a 1,3-beta-glucan synthase involved in cell wall biosynthesis. The three up-regulated genes with homologues in lipid metabolism corresponded to a phosphatidylserine synthase participating in phospholipid biosynthesis; a dihydroxyacetone kinase involved in glycerolipid metabolism, and an acid sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase, responsible for breaking sphingomyelin down into phosphocholine and ceramide. Proteins related to amino acid metabolism included the enzymes acetylornithine aminotransferase, involved in the urea cycle and the metabolism of amino groups, and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase, which catalyzes the third reaction in the catabolism of phenylalanine and tyrosine.

In addition to metabolic genes, we also observed the up-regulated expression in MS-P vs. MS of genes involved in signalling, transcription, translation, and post-translational modification and protein folding, including the pH signalling transcription factor Pac1 (PacC) from T. harzianum CECT 2413 [EMBL: EF094462]. As shown in additional file 5, genes with homologues in cellular transport and cytoskeleton and cell wall organization were also induced in T. harzianum mycelium in the presence of tomato plants.

Interestingly, a homologue of the protein Sm1/Elp1, which is an elicitor of systemic resistance in plants produced by T. virens/T. atroviride [29, 30], was also found to be induced in T. harzianum co-cultured with tomato plants in comparison with the control condition, supporting a role for this gene in the T. harzianum- tomato plant interaction. Unexpectedly, some mycoparasitism-associated genes described in the T. harzianum CECT 2413 strain, such as those encoding the secreted endochitinase CHIT42 [EMBL: S78423], trypsin-like protease PRA1 [EMBL: AJ249721], aspartic protease P6281 [EMBL: AJ967001] and the cell wall protein QID74 [EMBL: X95671] [31–34], were also significantly up-regulated in the interaction with tomato plants in the absence of phytopathogenic fungi (additional file 5). Northern blot analysis of these genes showed that p6281 and qid74 were strongly expressed in MS-P, while the transcript levels of chit42 and pra 1 were high in MS-Ch but were scarcely or not detected in MS-P (Figure 4). These results are not surprising, considering that the up-regulated expression of chit42 and pra 1 vs. the MS control condition estimated from the microarray hybridizations (additional file 5) resulted from extremely low expression values in this condition (microarray expression data in each culture condition are provided in additional file 2).

Discussion

This study was undertaken with the dual purpose of constructing an HDO microarray for species of Trichoderma, taking advantage of an EST collection previously generated plus the publicly available genome of T. reesei [20], and applying this tool for the first time to explore the transcriptional response of a T. harzianum biocontrol strain under early (9 h) Trichoderma-plant interaction conditions. Other previous approaches at transcriptional level have used macroarray technology to study the interaction of Trichoderma spp. with the seedling roots of cacao [13] and tomato [14]. However, the number of cDNA clones represented on these macroarrays -116 in the Trichoderma spp.-cacao interaction and 2,496 in the T. harzianum-tomato interaction- was much more limited compared with the high capacity, as well as the high reproducibility and sensitivity, of HDO microarrays [35]. Foreman et al. [36] used oligonucleotide microarrays (including 5,131 ESTs) to study the transcriptional regulation of biomass-degrading enzymes from T. reesei, a Trichoderma sp. of significance in the cellulose industry. In another study, the transcriptome of T. atroviride was analyzed using spotted microarrays (1,438 cDNA clones) but again not for the purpose of biocontrol [37].

The analysis reported here is based in a HDO microarray carrying probe sets representative of a total of 23,202 gene transcripts from thirteen Trichoderma strains, including 3,826 EST-based transcripts of the T. harzianum CECT 2413 biocontrol strain (Figure 1). Despite the redundant nature of EST libraries, a substantial representation of the T. harzianum CECT 2413 transcriptome can be expected from the probe sets included on the HDO microarray for this strain, considering that already sequenced Trichoderma genomes have been estimated to contain 9,129-11,643 predicted genes [21, 22, 38]. Moreover, as shown in this work probe sets on the microarray designed from transcripts of Trichoderma strains other than T. harzianum CECT 2413 were also useful for obtaining information about gene expression in our strain. In particular, we found that nearly half of the probe sets revealing significant expression changes after hybridization with cDNA from T. harzianum CECT 2413 (strain T34) derived from other strains or species of Trichoderma. The fact that genes known to respond rapidly and sharply to chitin, including those encoding the proteases PRA1, PRA2, PRB1 and PRB2 and the endochitinase CHIT42 [26, 39], yielded the expected expression patterns, and that a homologue of the SM1 gene with demonstrated expression in the first stages of T. virens-root interactions [29] was also detected in our T. harzianum-root interaction system, provide a high level of confidence that the microarrays identify differentially expressed genes. We are convinced that at present the Trichoderma HDO microarray proposed here offers the opportunity for extensive analyses of gene expression in Trichoderma strains whose whole genomes are not scheduled to be sequenced soon, such as those of T. harzianum, T. asperellum or T. viride. An improved microarray may now be possible for T. virens and T. atroviride, thanks to the release of their genome sequences and the availability of higher-density microarrays that ensure the coverage of complete genomes. For example, gene expression profiling based on entire genome tiling arrays will afford the possibility of monitoring the expression level of whole transcriptomes, avoiding the cloning biases of ESTs and allowing the data arising from different transcript variants that may not have been previously known or predicted to be distinguished. Furthermore, the introduction of new emerging technologies such as massive-scale RNA sequencing will in the near future enable us to overcome some of the limitations inherent to microarray-technology [40].

According to the overall transcriptional profiles, our microarray data showed that changes in gene expression in T. harzianum CECT 2413 were more striking (many probe sets displayed the highest or lowest levels of expression) when the fungus was cultured in glucose than with plant roots or with chitin as compared to minimal medium MS, at least at the time examined (9 h; Figure 3). Moreover, the total number of probe sets that exhibited a minimum of two-fold, up- or down-, regulation in glucose was also considerably higher (865) than in the presence of tomato plants (596), and this in turn was higher than in chitin-containing medium (254), with 57% (497), 38% (244), and 18% (45) of the probe sets, respectively, not shared among culture conditions, and hence probably representing genes specifically involved in each particular condition. Globally, the microarray results obtained indicate that T. harzianum uses transcriptional controls during its growth in glucose that differ from those occurring in minimal medium (control condition) to a greater extent than they do when the fungus grows on tomato roots and even more when it is grown in a medium containing chitin as the sole carbon source, which could be reasonably correlated with the availability of nutrients to the fungus in each of the culture media. Thus, the larger number of probes sets up-regulated by glucose relative to minimal medium in comparison to other conditions (580 by glucose vs. 257 by tomato plants, and 94 by chitin) is consistent with the extensive metabolic activity expected for a filamentous fungus growing in a rich medium with an easily assimilable substrate [41].

The forty-seven distinct genes identified from probe sets whose expression was at least two-fold induced in T. harzianum during co-culture with tomato plants (additional file 5) extend the number of previously published induced genes/proteins in Trichoderma biocontrol strains during plant colonization to a considerable extent. Nine differential proteins were identified by Marra et al. [15] in T. atroviride under in vitro interaction conditions with bean plants, using a proteomic approach; using macroarray analysis, Chacón et al. [14] described sixteen induced genes in T. harzianum interacting with tomato plant roots; and several more genes have been studied individually, such as those coding for two aspartyl proteases (pap A and pap B), a hyprophobin (TasHyd1) and an expansin-like protein (TasSwo) from T. asperellum, a mitogen-activated protein kinase (tmkA/task1) from T. virens/T. asperellum, and a hydrophobin-like protein (SM1) belonging to the cerato-platanin family and a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (tex 1) from T. virens [9–11, 29, 42, 43]. We found that many of the genes induced in T. harzianum mycelium in contact with tomato plant roots fell within GO categories related to metabolism, including anabolic and catabolic activities, which indicates an active adaptation of the fungus to the rhizosphere. Six of these genes showed similarities to genes expressed during the formation of infection structures in the phytopathogenic fungus M. grisea [28], such as a glycosyl hydrolase belonging to family 2 (with several known hydrolytic activities: beta-galactosidase, beta-mannosidase, and beta-glucuronidase), which was also up-regulated in mycelium of T. hamatum and T. ovalisporum interacting with cacao seedlings [13]; an aldose 1-epimerase (mutarotase), which is responsible for the anomeric interconversion of D-glucose and other aldoses during normal aldose metabolism [44] and is related to the fungal GAL10 protein, involved in galactose metabolism in H. jecorina [45]; a dihydroxyacetone kinase, which uses ATP as a source of high-energy phosphate to produce dihydroxyacetone phosphate, a biochemical compound mainly involved in the glycolytic pathway and lipid biosynthesis; a sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase, a major enzyme for the production of ceramide in response to cellular stresses [46] that also contributes to polarized hyphal growth in Aspergillus fumigatus [47], and a gtp cyclohydrolase I, which participates in the production of tetrahydrofolate, in turn involved in nucleic acid and methionine synthesis, and also of tetrahydrobiopterin, a cofactor essential for the synthesis of hydroxy-amino acids, including auxin-related amino acids such as 5-hydroxytryptophan, as well as for the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO). Auxins are important plant regulators involved in many growth and behavioural processes, including those activated by Trichoderma spp. [12]. Additionally, NO is a wide-spread signalling molecule related to a number of critical signal transduction pathways in mammals and plants, and it has also been reported to have a regulatory effect in photoconidiation and conidial germination in fungi [48, 49]. Another up-regulated gene that suggests that T. harzianum could produce NO during the first stages of its interaction with tomato plants is that coding for an acetylornithine aminotransferase, which is a pyridoxal-phosphate-dependent enzyme involved in arginine biosynthesis. L-arginine is important for protein biosynthesis but also participates in the synthesis of NO. In the filamentous fungus Coniothyrium minitans, it has been recently found that arginine is essential for conidiation, possibly through a NO-mediated process [50].

Another ten identified genes induced in T. harzianum by the presence of tomato plants also pointed to the active growth and development of the fungus, among them, those encoding homologues of two D-lactate dehydrogenases, which modulate the flow of pyruvate when glucose is required for cell growth or hyphal development [51]; a glucan synthase, which is a key enzyme for fungal cell wall biosynthesis [52] and whose up-regulation is correlated with the previous proteomic study performed by Marra et al. [15] showing increased expression of a cell wall synthesis-associated chitin synthase in T. atroviride during interaction with bean leaves; a phosphatidylserine synthase, which is known to participate in cell-membrane building through the CDP-diacylglycerol metabolic process [53]; a 4-hydroxyphenylpiruvate dioxigenase, which has been found to be directly involved in the growth and differentiation of the pathogenic phase of the fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis [54]; a formyltetrahydrofolate deformylase, which participates in small-molecule metabolism and the synthesis of DNA and has been described to be related to early stages of microbial symbiotic relations to plants [55]; a pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein belonging to the PPR protein family that includes proteins involved in RNA post-transcriptional processing and development [56]; and a class II hydrophobin from T. virens [EMBL: ABS59373] [57]. Trichoderma hydrophobins are known to play major roles in hyphal development and conidiation [58–60], and it has also been reported recently that the hydrophobin TasHyd1 from T. asperellum participates in cucumber root colonization [9] and that a hydrophobin of T. atroviride was induced during interaction with bean roots [15].

Another gene related to adhesion to hydrophobic surfaces with up-regulated expression in T. harzianum in response to growth on tomato plant roots was qid 74. This gene, which encodes a cell wall protein described in T. harzianum CECT 2413 [34], has been proposed to participate in cell adherence and cell wall protection against toxins produced by fungal hosts during mycoparasitic interactions [61], and our expression results support a role for this protein in the Trichoderma-plant interaction. Apart from qid74, the significant up-regulation detected by microarrays of some other known genes of T. harzianum CECT 2413, such as those encoding secreted enzymes associated with the breakdown of fungal cell wall components during Trichoderma-fungal host interactions (endochitinase CHIT42 and proteases PRA1 and P6281) and the transcription factor Pac1 (which was been described to regulate some of these micoparasitic enzymes [62]), indicates that they could also participate during early stages of the Trichoderma-plant interaction. These data match the hypothesis suggested by Woo et al. [5] that among the Trichoderma elicitors that activate plant defence responses are some of the proteins, such as chitinases and glucanases, that the fungus uses for its mycoparasitic activities.

The increased expression in T. harzianum-tomato plant co-cultures of a nitropropane dioxygenase gene, which has been related to fungal defence against toxic nitroalkanes produced by plants [63], suggests that T. harzianum is able to protect itself from harmful plant substances. Some other up-regulated genes that may also be related to detoxification processes were those encoding a dimethylaniline monooxygenase, which is a broad spectrum flavoprotein that accepts diverse substrates, including plant alkaloids [64]; a RTA-1 domain protein belonging to the RTA1 family, which is comprised of fungal proteins involved in resistance to toxic substances [65]; and a glutathione-dependent formaldehyde-activating enzyme, which could be involved in the consumption of the cytotoxic formaldehyde resulting from many demethylation reactions [66].

Finally, it is worth noting that those non-identified transcripts that were detected in this study as up-regulated in T. harzianum by the presence of tomato plants (non-annotated sequences from additional file 3) are also an additional resource for future research on Trichoderma-plant interactions, especially those that did not respond significantly to other culture conditions assessed.

Conclusion

The Trichoderma HDO microarray presented here has enabled us to define a gene set probably involved in the transcriptional response of the fungus T. harzianum CECT 2413 within the first hours of contact with tomato plant roots. Many of the genes identified had not been previously related to Trichoderma-plant interactions, including those respsonsible for the possible biosynthesis of nitric oxide, xenobiotic detoxification, micoparasitic activities, mycelium development, or those related to the formation of infection structures in plant tissues, which can provide new insight into the mechanisms and roles of this fungus in the Trichoderma- plant interaction. The effectiveness of the Trichoderma HDO microarray in the detection of different gene responses in T. harzianum under different growth conditions strongly indicates that this tool should be useful for further assays addressing different stages of plant colonization, as well as for expression studies in other Trichoderma spp. represented on it.

Methods

Fungal and plant growth conditions

Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413 (Spanish Type Culture Collection, Valencia, Spain) was grown on potato dextrose agar (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo, USA) plates in the dark at 28°C for 10 days. Spores were collected and used as inoculum (107 spores as counted with a hemocytometer) for fungal pre-cultures in 250-ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 100 ml of liquid minimal medium [67] supplemented with 2% glucose as carbon source. Flasks were then maintained at 28°C and 150 rpm for 48 h. After this time, fungal biomass was harvested by filtration, washed twice with sterile distilled water, and immediately transferred to the definitive cultures (see below).

Tomato seeds (Solanum lycopersicum, formerly Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. Manitu) from Ramiro Arnedo S.A. (Calahorra, La Rioja, Spain) were surface-sterilized by vigorous sequential shaking in 70% ethanol and 2% hypochlorite solution, for 5 min each, and then thoroughly washed with sterile distilled water and air-dried on a sterile gauze sheet. Seeds were germinated in multi-cell growing trays containing sterile soil substrate covered with vermiculite in a controlled environment chamber with 75% humidity and a photoperiod of 16 h light at 23°C. Plants were then allowed to grow under these conditions for twelve weeks.

For Trichoderma- plant interactions in hydroponic cultures, twelve-week-old tomato plants were collected and their roots were thoroughly washed in sterile distilled water, and surface sterilized by dipping sequentially in 70% ethanol, 2% hypochlorite solution, and sterile distilled water. Then, each tomato plant was submerged up to the stem in a 250-ml Erlenmeyer flask filled with 100 ml of liquid Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal medium (Duchefa, Haarlem, The Netherlands) (MS-P medium). MS is a commonly used medium for plant tissue cultures but it has been also used to analyze Trichoderma secreted proteins in hydroponic systems [8, 14]. Immediately, T. harzianum mycelia obtained as described above were also transferred to the MS-P medium under aseptic conditions. Fungal cultures in MS medium without the presence of tomato plants were used as controls.

T. harzianum cultures in rich medium (MS supplemented with 2% glucose: MS-G medium) and in the presence of chitin [MS containing 1% chitin (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo, USA): MS-Ch medium] were also included in the study for comparative purposes.

All cultures were maintained at 28°C and 90 rpm for 9 h. After this time, Trichoderma mycelia were harvested by filtration (the mycelium on the plant roots was recovered with a direct water jet, avoiding excessive manipulation). Mycelia were washed twice with sterile distilled water, frozen in liquid nitrogen, lyophilized, and kept at -80°C until RNA extraction.

Microarray design and construction

A self-designed Trichoderma high-density oligonucleotide (HDO) microarray was used in this study. A collection of 14,237 transcript sequences obtained for the "TrichoEST project" from ESTs (11,376 singlets and 2,861 contigs provided in additional files 6 and 7, respectively) of twelve strains of eight different Trichoderma spp. [CECT: T. harzianum T34 (CECT 2413); NewBiotechnic S.A. (NBT, Seville, Spain): T. longibrachiatum T52 (NBT52); T. virens T59 (NBT59), T. viride T78 (NBT78); American type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, USA): T. atroviride TP1 (ATCC 74058), T. harzianum T22 (ATCC 20847); Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (CBS, Baarn, The Netherlands): T. stromaticum TST (CBS 100875); International Mycological Institute (IMI, Egham, UK): T. atroviride T11 (IMI 352941); T. asperellum T53 (IMI 20268); BioCentrum-DTU Culture Collection of Fungi (IBT, Lyngby, Denmark): T. harzianum T3K (IBT 9385); T. aggressivum TH2 (IBT 9394); University Federico II of Naples (UNINA, Portici, Italy): T. harzianum TA6 (UNINA 96)], plus 9,129 transcript sequences predicted from the T. reesei QM 6a genome [38] were used as source sequences to generate probes for the Trichoderma HDO microarray.

First, unique sequences were obtained from the whole TrichoEST database by combining ESTs from all twelve Trichoderma strains indicated above in order to minimize redundancy due to transcripts common to different strains. CAP3 assembly [68] of the combined ESTs resulted in 3,152 contigs and 9,510 singlets, totalling 12,662 unique sequences. The probe selection process was then carried out by 'in-house' bioinformatics programs, executing the following steps: (1) An initial pool of all possible probes was obtained by sliding a 25-bp window with a step-size of 1-bp over each source sequence (12,662 + 9,129), resulting in a total of 18,881,401 different probes. (2) Then, the probes were matched against the total of source sequences and additionally against the full-length genome of T. reesei to evaluate their uniqueness by simple frequency counting. The probes that matched more than one transcript of T. reesei or more than fifty transcripts of Trichoderma spp. or that occurred more than once in the complete T. reesei genome were discarded by the probe selection algorithm. A frequency cut-off of 50 was set with respect to the Trichoderma EST-based database with the aim of covering redundant sequences that remained erroneously unassembled into contigs, for example, due to residual vector contaminations. (3) The resulting probe list (18,870,469 probes) was further narrowed by applying different probe quality filters: self-complementarity; a GC-content between 40-60%; a content of any single nucleotide less than 40% of the probe length; fewer than five consecutive nucleotide repetitions. (4) Finally, a probe prioritization process was carried out to adjust the total number of probes that passed the previous criteria (6,060,523 probes) to the microarray capacity (385,000 probes). To accomplish this, probes were first mapped to both Trichoderma spp. and T. reesei transcript sequence collections and were then evenly spaced over each sequence with a fixed minimum number of 10 probes per sequence (or 10 probes within a probe set), except for those with less than 10 probes passing the previous filters. Since a random priming strategy was to be used for cDNA sample preparation, probes were distributed uniformly along each whole transcript sequence.

The final probe list was submitted to Roche-NimbleGen, Inc. (Madison, WI, USA) for quality control and subsequent probe array layout. Additional probes were also included on the microarray by Roche-NimbleGen, Inc. for quality control of the hybridization process. Microarray manufacture was then carried out using maskless, digital micromirror technology [69].

Sample preparation for microarray hybridization

T. harzianum CECT 2413 freeze-dried mycelia were ground in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle, and total RNA was extracted using TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The RNA quality and quantity were determined spectrophotometrically and the RNA integrity was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. For each experimental condition, an equal amount of total RNA (200 μg) from three independent replicates of mycelium was mixed. mRNA was then purified using Dynabeads (Dynal®, Oslo, Norway) twice consecutively to avoid rRNA contamination. Then, cDNA synthesis was performed from 5 μg mRNA using the Just cDNA™ Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. A random priming strategy was followed in order to obtain cDNAs with more 5' information. The cDNAs were finally submitted to NimbleGen Systems Inc. for labelling with Cy3 dye-labelled 9 mer random primers and subsequent hybridization using a MAUI (Micro Array User Interface) Hybridization System (.BioMicro® Systems, Salt Lake City, UT, USA). Hybridizations were carried out in duplicate with cDNA obtained from independent experiments.

Microarray data analysis

Microarray scanning and data acquisition were performed by NimbleGen Systems Inc. using an Axon GenePix 4000B scanner with associated NimbleScan 2.3 software. Then, the images and the raw probe intensity values obtained from the eight microarrays were examined, processed, and analysed at our lab. The raw data were deposited in the GEO database [70] with series accession number GSE13776. Visual inspection of the scanned images failed to reveal obvious scratches or spatial variations across each microarray. Similarly, the distributions of the raw probe intensities were generated for all microarrays, and no apparent deviances were observed. Data were subsequently processed for background adjustment, normalization and summarization. Briefly, a Robust Multichip Average (RMA) convolution model was applied for background correction, and the corrected probe intensities were then normalized using a quantile-based normalization procedure as performed by Irizarry et al. [71]. Following this, the normalized values for each probe obtained from the eight microarrays were scaled in the 0-1 range to compensate for sequence-specific sensitivity. Finally, the processed data for the different probes within a probe set were summed to produce an expression measure.

To identify probe sets showing a significant difference in expression level in at least one of the culture conditions considered (fungus grown in MS-P, MS-Ch, MS-G and MS) compared to one another, a multi-class Significance Analysis of Microarray (SAM) test [72] was carried out on the expression values using a False Discovery Rate (FDR) of 0.23. The analysis was performed using the siggenes package [73] through the R software environment for statistical computing and graphics [74].

Transcripts showing significantly up-regulated expression were annotated using Gene Ontology (GO) terms and hierarchical structure http://www.geneontology.org. The Blast2GO program [27], which assigns the GO terms based on the BLAST definitions, was applied with an E-value < 10-5 level.

Northern blot analyses

Northern blots were obtained using total RNA extracted from T. harzianum CECT 2413 freeze-dried mycelia collected as described above. RNA separation (30 μg), blotting and hybridization were carried out using standard techniques. Specific DNA probes of each gene were produced by PCR of the corresponding cDNA clone from our Trichoderma cDNA clone collection, using the primers T3 and T7 from the Uni-Zap XR vector (Stratagene). The DNA probes were P32-labelled using Ready to go DNA labelling beads (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany) and radioactive signals were visualized with a PhosphorImager System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), using QuantityOne software.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants (SA038A06 and GR67) from the Junta de Castilla and León (Spain). The authors wish to thank Francisco J. González for his help in managing the Trichoderma EST database.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centro Hispano-Luso de Investigaciones Agrarias (CIALE), Universidad de Salamanca. Campus de Villamayor-Parque Científico, 37185 Villamayor, Salamanca, Spain
(2)
Centro de Investigación Biomédica de La Rioja (CIBIR), Piqueras 98, 26006 Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
(3)
EMBL Outstation, European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
(4)
Current address: Instituto de Microbiología Bioquímica, CSIC/Universidad de Salamanca. Campus Miguel de Unamuno, 37007 Salamanca, Spain

References

  1. Benítez T, Rincón AM, Limón MC, Codón AC: Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int Microbiol. 2004, 7: 249-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Howell CR: Mechanisms employed by Trichoderma species in the biological control of plant diseases: the hystory and evolution of current concepts. Plant Disease. 2003, 87: 4-10. 10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M: Trichoderma species-opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004, 2: 43-56. 10.1038/nrmicro797.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Vinale F, Sivasithamparam K, Ghisalberti EL, Marra R, Woo SL, Lorito M: Trichoderma-plant pathogen interactions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2008, 40: 1-10. 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.07.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Woo SL, Scala F, Ruocco M, Lorito M: The molecular biology of the interactions between Trichoderma spp., phytopathogenic fungi, and plants. Phytopathology. 2006, 96: 181-5. 10.1094/PHYTO-96-0181.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Suzuki K, Nishiuchi T, Nakayama Y, Ito M, Shinshi H: Elicitor-induced down-regulation of cell cycle-related genes in tobacco cells. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29: 183-91. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01411.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Djonovic S, Vargas WA, Kolomiets MV, Horndeski M, Wiest A, Kenerley CM: A proteinaceous elicitor Sm1 from the beneficial fungus Trichoderma virens is required for induced systemic resistance in maize. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145: 875-89. 10.1104/pp.107.103689.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Vargas WA, Djonovic S, Sukno SA, Kenerley CM: Dimerization controls the activity of fungal elicitors that trigger systemic resistance in plants. J Biol Chem. 2008, 283: 19804-15. 10.1074/jbc.M802724200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Viterbo A, Wiest A, Brotman Y, Chet I, Kenerley CM: The 18 mer peptaibols from Trichoderma virens elicit plant defence responses. Mol Plant Pathol. 2007, 8: 737-746. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00430.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Viterbo A, Chet I: TasHyd1, a new hydrophobin gene from the biocontrol agent Trichoderma asperellum, is involved in plant root colonization. Mol Plant Pathol. 2006, 7: 249-558. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00335.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Brotman Y, Briff E, Viterbo A, Chet I: Role of swollenin, an expansin-like protein from Trichoderma, in plant root colonization. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147: 779-89. 10.1104/pp.108.116293.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macías-Rodríguez L, Cortés-Penagos C, López-Bucio J: Trichoderma virens, a Plant Beneficial Fungus, Enhances Biomass Production and Promotes Lateral Root Growth through an Auxin-Dependent Mechanism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149: 1579-92. 10.1104/pp.108.130369.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bailey BA, Bae H, Strem MD, Roberts DP, Thomas SE, Crozier J, Samuels GJ, Choi IY, Holmes KA: Fungal and plant gene expression during the colonization of cacao seedlings by endophytic isolates of four Trichoderma species. Planta. 2006, 224: 1449-64. 10.1007/s00425-006-0314-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chacón MR, Rodríguez-Galán O, Benítez T, Sousa S, Rey M, Llobell A, Delgado-Jarana J: Microscopic and transcriptome analyses of early colonization of tomato roots by Trichoderma harzianum. Int Microbiol. 2007, 10: 19-27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Marra R, Ambrosino P, Carbone V, Vinale F, Woo SL, Ruocco M, Ciliento R, Lanzuise S, Ferraioli S, Soriente I, Gigante S, Turra D, Fogliano V, Scala F, Lorito M: Study of the three-way interaction between Trichoderma atroviride, plant and fungal pathogens by using a proteomic approach. Curr Genet. 2006, 50: 307-21. 10.1007/s00294-006-0091-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Alfano G, Ivey ML, Cakir C, Bos JI, Miller SA, Madden LV, Kamoun S, Hoitink HA: Systemic Modulation of Gene Expression in Tomato by Trichoderma hamatum 382. Phytopathology. 2007, 97: 429-37. 10.1094/PHYTO-97-4-0429.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Segarra G, Casanova E, Bellido D, Odena MA, Oliveira E, Trillas I: Proteome, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid changes in cucumber plants inoculated with Trichoderma asperellum strain T34. Proteomics. 2007, 7: 3943-52. 10.1002/pmic.200700173.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Shoresh M, Harman GE: The molecular basis of shoot responses of maize seedlings to Trichoderma harzianum T22 inoculation of the root: a proteomic approach. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147: 2147-63. 10.1104/pp.108.123810.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Breakspear A, Momany M: The first fifty microarray studies in filamentous fungi. Microbiology. 2007, 153: 7-15. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/002592-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Martínez D, Berka RM, Henrissat B, Saloheimo M, Arvas M, Baker SE, Chapman J, Chertkov O, Coutinho PM, Cullen D, Danchin EG, Grigoriev IV, Harris P, Jackson M, Kubicek CP, Han CS, Ho I, Larrondo LF, de Leon AL, Magnuson JK, Merino S, Misra M, Nelson B, Putnam N, Robbertse B, Salamov AA, Schmoll M, Terry A, Thayer N, Westerholm-Parvinen A, Schoch CL, Yao J, Barabote R, Nelson MA, Detter C, Bruce D, Kuske CR, Xie G, Richardson P, Rokhsar DS, Lucas SM, Rubin EM, Dunn-Coleman N, Ward M, Brettin TS: Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina). Nat Biotechnol. 2008, 26: 553-60. 10.1038/nbt1403.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. JGI Trichoderma atroviride v1.0. [http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Triat1/Triat1.home.html]
  22. JGI Trichoderma virens v1.0. [http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Trive1/Trive1.home.html]
  23. Vizcaíno JA, González FJ, Suárez MB, Redondo J, Heinrich J, Delgado-Jarana J, Hermosa R, Gutiérrez S, Monte E, Llobell A, Rey M: Generation, annotation and analysis of ESTs from Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 193-10.1186/1471-2164-7-193.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rey M, Llobell A, Monte E, Scala F, Lorito M, Monte E: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol . Edited by: K. Arora & G.G. Khachatourians. 2007, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 4: 225-248. Fungal Genomics, Genomics of Trichoderma. Mycology and BiotechnologyGoogle Scholar
  25. Rey M, Llobell A, Monte E, Lorito M: Genomics of Trichoderma. Appl Micol & Biotechnol. 2004, 4: 225-248. 10.1016/S1874-5334(04)80012-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Suárez MB, Vizcaíno JA, Llobell A, Monte E: Characterization of genes encoding novel peptidases in the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413 using the TrichoEST functional genomics approach. Curr Genet. 2007, 51: 331-42. 10.1007/s00294-007-0130-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Gotz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, Robles M, Talon M, Dopazo J, Conesa A: High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36: 3420-35. 10.1093/nar/gkn176.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Gowda M, Venu RC, Raghupathy MB, Nobuta K, Li H, Wing R, Stahlberg E, Couglan S, Haudenschild CD, Dean R, Nahm BH, Meyers BC, Wang GL: Deep and comparative analysis of the mycelium and appressorium transcriptomes of Magnaporthe grisea using MPSS, RL-SAGE, and oligoarray methods. BMC Genomics. 2006, 7: 310-10.1186/1471-2164-7-310.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Djonovic S, Pozo MJ, Dangott LJ, Howell CR, Kenerley CM: Sm1, a proteinaceous elicitor secreted by the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma virens induces plant defense responses and systemic resistance. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006, 19: 838-53. 10.1094/MPMI-19-0838.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Seidl V, Marchetti M, Schandl R, Allmaier G, Kubicek C: Elp1, the major secreted protein of Hypocrea atroviridis on glucose, is amember of a stronlgy conserved protein family comprising plant defese response elicitors. The FEBS journal. 2006, 273: 4346-4359. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05435.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. García I, Lora JM, de la Cruz J, Benítez T, Llobell A, Pintor Toro JA: Cloning and characterization of a chitinase (chit42) cDNA from the mycoparasitic fungus Trichoderma harzianum. Curr Genet. 1994, 27: 83-9. 10.1007/BF00326583.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Suárez B, Rey M, Castillo P, Monte E, Llobell A: Isolation and characterization of PRA1, a trypsin-like protease from the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413 displaying nematicidal activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004, 65: 46-55. 10.1007/s00253-004-1610-x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Suárez MB, Sanz L, Chamorro MI, Rey M, Gonzalez FJ, Llobell A, Monte E: Proteomic analysis of secreted proteins from Trichoderma harzianum. Identification of a fungal cell wall-induced aspartic protease. Fungal Genet Biol. 2005, 42: 924-34. 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.08.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Rey M, Ohno S, Pintor-Toro JA, Llobell A, Benitez T: Unexpected homology between inducible cell wall protein QID74 of filamentous fungi and BR3 salivary protein of the insect Chironomus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 6212-6. 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6212.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Iwahashi H, Kitagawa E, Suzuki Y, Ueda Y, Ishizawa YH, Nobumasa H, Kuboki Y, Hosoda H, Iwahashi Y: Evaluation of toxicity of the mycotoxin citrinin using yeast ORF DNA microarray and Oligo DNA microarray. BMC Genomics. 2007, 8: 95-10.1186/1471-2164-8-95.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Foreman PK, Brown D, Dankmeyer L, Dean R, Diener S, Dunn-Coleman NS, Goedegebuur F, Houfek TD, England GJ, Kelley AS, Meerman HJ, Mitchell T, Mitchinson C, Olivares HA, Teunissen PJ, Yao J, Ward M: Transcriptional regulation of biomass-degrading enzymes in the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 31988-97. 10.1074/jbc.M304750200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosales-Saavedra T, Esquivel-Naranjo EU, Casas-Flores S, Martínez-Hernández P, Ibarra-Laclette E, Cortés-Penagos C, Herrera-Estrella A: Novel light-regulated genes in Trichoderma atroviride: a dissection by cDNA microarrays. Microbiology. 2006, 152: 3305-17. 10.1099/mic.0.29000-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. JGI Trichoderma reesei v2.0. [http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Trire2/Trire2.home.html]
  39. Carsolio C, Gutierrez A, Jimenez B, Van Montagu M, Herrera-Estrella A: Characterization of ech-42, a Trichoderma harzianum endochitinase gene expressed during mycoparasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 10903-7. 10.1073/pnas.91.23.10903.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Denoeud F, Aury JM, Da Silva C, Noel B, Rogier O, Delledonne M, Morgante M, Valle G, Wincker P, Scarpelli C, Jaillon O, Artiguenave F: Annotating genomes with massive-scale RNA sequencing. Genome Biol. 2008, 9: R175-10.1186/gb-2008-9-12-r175.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Chambergo FS, Bonaccorsi ED, Ferreira AJ, Ramos AS, Ferreira Junior JR, Abrahao-Neto J, Farah JP, El-Dorry H: Elucidation of the metabolic fate of glucose in the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei using expressed sequence tag (EST) analysis and cDNA microarrays. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 13983-8. 10.1074/jbc.M107651200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Viterbo A, Harel M, Horwitz BA, Chet I, Mukherjee PK: Trichoderma mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling is involved in induction of plant systemic resistance. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 6241-6. 10.1128/AEM.71.10.6241-6246.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Viterbo A, Harel M, Chet I: Isolation of two aspartyl proteases from Trichoderma asperellum expressed during colonization of cucumber roots. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004, 238: 151-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Poolman B, Royer TJ, Mainzer SE, Schmidt BF: Carbohydrate utilization in Streptococcus thermophilus: characterization of the genes for aldose 1-epimerase (mutarotase) and UDPglucose 4-epimerase. J Bacteriol. 1990, 172: 4037-47.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Seiboth B, Karaffa L, Sandor E, Kubicek C: The Hypocrea jecorina gal10 (uridine 5'-diphosphate-glucose 4-epimerase-encoding) gene differs from yeast homologues in structure, genomic organization and expression. Gene. 2002, 295: 143-9. 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00834-X.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Hannun YA, Obeid LM: The Ceramide-centric universe of lipid-mediated cell regulation: stress encounters of the lipid kind. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 25847-50. 10.1074/jbc.R200008200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Li S, Du L, Yuen G, Harris SD: Distinct ceramide synthases regulate polarized growth in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Biol Cell. 2006, 17: 1218-27. 10.1091/mbc.E05-06-0533.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang J, Higgins VJ: Nitric oxide has a regulatory effect in the germination of conidia of Colletotrichum coccodes. Fungal Genet Biol. 2005, 42: 284-92. 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.04.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Ninnemann H, Maier J: Indications for the occurrence of nitric oxide synthases in fungi and plants and the involvement in photoconidiation of Neurospora crassa. Photochem Photobiol. 1996, 64: 393-8. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1996.tb02477.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Gong X, Fu Y, Jiang D, Li G, Yi X, Peng Y: L-arginine is essential for conidiation in the filamentous fungus Coniothyrium minitans. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007, 44: 1368-79. 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.07.007.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. LeJohn HB: D(-)-lactate dehydrogenases in fungi. Kinetics and allosteric inhibition by guanosine triphosphate. J Biol Chem. 1971, 246: 2116-26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Latge JP: The cell wall: a carbohydrate armour for the fungal cell. Mol Microbiol. 2007, 66: 279-90. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05872.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Iwanyshyn WM, Han GS, Carman GM: Regulation of phospholipid synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by zinc. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 21976-83. 10.1074/jbc.M402047200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Nunes LR, Costa de Oliveira R, Leite DB, da Silva VS, dos Reis Marques E, da Silva Ferreira ME, Ribeiro DC, de Souza Bernardes LA, Goldman MH, Puccia R, Travassos LR, Batista WL, Nobrega MP, Nobrega FG, Yang DY, de Braganca Pereira CA, Goldman GH: Transcriptome analysis of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis cells undergoing mycelium-to-yeast transition. Eukaryot Cell. 2005, 4: 2115-28. 10.1128/EC.4.12.2115-2128.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang XS, Cheng HP: Identification of Sinorhizobium meliloti early symbiotic genes by use of a positive functional screen. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006, 72: 2738-48. 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2738-2748.2006.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Saha D, Prasad AM, Srinivasan R: Pentatricopeptide repeat proteins and their emerging roles in plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2007, 45: 521-34. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.03.026.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Kubicek CP, Baker S, Gamauf C, Kenerley CM, Druzhinina IS: Purifying selection and birth-and-death evolution in the class II hydrophobin gene families of the ascomycete Trichoderma/Hypocrea. BMC Evol Biol. 2008, 8: 4-10.1186/1471-2148-8-4.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Mendoza-Mendoza A, Rosales-Saavedra T, Cortes C, Castellanos-Juarez V, Martinez P, Herrera-Estrella A: The MAP kinase TVK1 regulates conidiation, hydrophobicity and the expression of genes encoding cell wall proteins in the fungus Trichoderma virens. Microbiology. 2007, 153: 2137-47. 10.1099/mic.0.2006/005462-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Munoz G, Nakari-Setala T, Agosin E, Penttila M: Hydrophobin gene srh1, expressed during sporulation of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma harzianum. Curr Genet. 1997, 32: 225-30. 10.1007/s002940050270.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Askolin S, Penttila M, Wosten HA, Nakari-Setala T: The Trichoderma reesei hydrophobin genes hfb1 and hfb2 have diverse functions in fungal development. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005, 253: 281-8. 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.09.047.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Rosado IV, Rey M, Codón AC, Govantes J, Moreno-Mateos MA, Benítez T: QID74 Cell wall protein of Trichoderma harzianum is involved in cell protection and adherence to hydrophobic surfaces. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007, 44: 950-64. 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.01.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Moreno-Mateos MA, Delgado-Jarana J, Codón AC, Benítez T: pH and Pac1 control development and antifungal activity in Trichoderma harzianum. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007, 44: 1355-67. 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.07.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Daubner SC, Gadda G, Valley MP, Fitzpatrick PF: Cloning of nitroalkane oxidase from Fusarium oxysporum identifies a new member of the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase superfamily. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 2702-7. 10.1073/pnas.052527799.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Naumann C, Hartmann T, Ober D: Evolutionary recruitment of a flavin-dependent monooxygenase for the detoxification of host plant-acquired pyrrolizidine alkaloids in the alkaloid-defended arctiid moth Tyria jacobaeae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002, 99: 6085-90. 10.1073/pnas.082674499.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Soustre I, Letourneux Y, Karst F: Characterization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RTA1 gene involved in 7-aminocholesterol resistance. Curr Genet. 1996, 30: 121-5. 10.1007/s002940050110.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Goenrich M, Bartoschek S, Hagemeier CH, Griesinger C, Vorholt JA: A glutathione-dependent formaldehyde-activating enzyme (Gfa) from Paracoccus denitrificans detected and purified via two-dimensional proton exchange NMR spectroscopy. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 3069-72. 10.1074/jbc.C100579200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Penttilä M, Nevalainen H, Ratto M, Salminen E, Knowles J: A versatile transformation system for the folamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. Gene. 1987, 61: 155-164. 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90110-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Huang X, Madan A: CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res. 1999, 9: 868-77. 10.1101/gr.9.9.868.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. NimbleGen's array synthesis technology. [http://www.nimblegen.com/technology/manufacture.html]
  70. Gene expression omnibus database. [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/geo/]
  71. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, Speed TP: Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics. 2003, 4: 249-64. 10.1093/biostatistics/4.2.249.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G: Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 5116-21. 10.1073/pnas.091062498.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Bioinformatics software for genomic data. [http://bioconductor.org]
  74. Software environment for statistical computing and graphics. [http://www.r-project.org]

Copyright

© Samolski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us