Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Microbiology

Open Access

Cytokinesis is blocked in mammalian cells transfected with Chlamydia trachomatis gene CT223

  • Damir T Alzhanov1, 2, 3,
  • Sara K Weeks2,
  • Jeffrey R Burnett2 and
  • Daniel D Rockey1, 2Email author
BMC Microbiology20099:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-9-2

Received: 28 August 2008

Accepted: 05 January 2009

Published: 05 January 2009

Abstract

Background

The chlamydiae alter many aspects of host cell biology, including the division process, but the molecular biology of these alterations remains poorly characterized. Chlamydial inclusion membrane proteins (Incs) are likely candidates for direct interactions with host cell cytosolic proteins, as they are secreted to the inclusion membrane and exposed to the cytosol. The inc gene CT223 is one of a sequential set of orfs that encode or are predicted to encode Inc proteins. CT223p is localized to the inclusion membrane in all tested C. trachomatis serovars.

Results

A plasmid transfection approach was used to examine the function of the product of CT223 and other Inc proteins within uninfected mammalian cells. Fluorescence microscopy was used to demonstrate that CT223, and, to a lesser extent, adjacent inc genes, are capable of blocking host cell cytokinesis and facilitating centromere supranumeracy defects seen by others in chlamydiae-infected cells. Both phenotypes were associated with transfection of plasmids encoding the carboxy-terminal tail of CT223p, a region of the protein that is likely exposed to the cytosol in infected cells.

Conclusion

These studies suggest that certain Inc proteins block cytokinesis in C. trachomatis-infected cells. These results are consistent with the work of others showing chlamydial inhibition of host cell cytokinesis.

Background

Chlamydiae are obligate intracellular bacteria that replicate in a cytoplasmic vacuole (the inclusion) within host cells [1, 2]. All Chlamydia spp. are significant pathogens, and infections occur in a wide variety of animal species. Chlamydia trachomatis infections lead to serious mucosal diseases of humans including blinding trachoma [3] and diseases of the genital tract [4]. The study of chlamydial host-pathogen relationships is complicated by the lack of a genetic system to manipulate the chlamydial genome, and thus, alternate approaches must be used to understand chlamydial virulence properties. One approach that has been particularly useful in these studies is the use of surrogate genetic systems including yeast, mammalian cells, and other bacterial species [510].

Inhibition of the host cell cycle by chlamydiae was demonstrated by early researchers [11, 12] and was expanded upon recently by Greene and Zhong [13]. Other recent investigations have demonstrated that chlamydial infection alters the cell cycle in a variety of ways, leading to centrosomal defects [14] and slowing of host cell division [15]. The molecular mechanisms leading to these changes are poorly understood. Recent studies have suggested a possible role of chlamydiae in cancers of different infected tissues [1618] and, thus, the role of chlamydiae in alterations of cell cycle biology are of significance.

The different chlamydial species each produce a set of proteins, termed Incs, that are localized to the chlamydial inclusion membrane and exposed to the cytosol of the host cell [19]. Each sequenced chlamydial genome encodes over 40 candidate Incs, and there are both conserved and species-specific Incs among the different chlamydiae. The demonstrated function of a limited number of Inc proteins is known [9, 2023], but most are poorly characterized.

Chlamydia trachomatis encodes a species-specific set of Incs within orfs CT223-CT229. CT224 and CT225 have no clear homologs in any other chlamydiae, while CT223, and CT226–CT229 have homologs only in C. muridarum, a closely related chlamydial species [24]. The localization to the inclusion membrane of the products of CT223, CT225, CT226, and CT229 was confirmed via fluorescence microscopy [25]. Transcription of CT228 and CT229 is initiated very early following infection of cells [26] and, therefore, the encoded proteins are hypothesized to be essential to early inclusion development. Recent work by Rzomp et al. demonstrated that CT229p associated with Rab4 in a two-hybrid assay and in mammalian cells [20], but the function of any of the proteins encoded by the other orfs in this group is not known. To address possible functions of candidate C. trachomatis Incs, we used a plasmid transfection system to introduce genes encoding different Incs into mammalian cells, and then characterized any resulting phenotypes with fluorescence microscopy. These investigations demonstrated that transfection with plasmids expressing CT223, and to a lesser extent, CT224 and CT225, led to a block in host cell cytokinesis. Cells transfected with plasmids encoding CT223p led to an inhibition of cytokinesis that was similar to that seen in C. trachomatis- infected cells. The block was shown to be associated with the carboxy-terminal end of CT223p, the region of the protein hypothesized to be exposed to the host cell cytosol at the surface of the inclusion. Alleles of CT223 from different strains yielded similar inhibition of cytokinesis, consistent with the inhibitory effect on cytokinesis by all tested C. trachomatis serovars [13].

Methods

Chlamydial strains, DNA preparation, and host cell lines

Elementary bodies (EB) of Chlamydia trachomatis strains D/UW3, J/UW36, J9235, J(s)1980, J(s)6686 and LGV-434, C. caviae strain GPIC, and C. muridarum strain Nigg were used in infections and/or for preparation of genomic DNA samples that were used as PCR templates. Genomic DNA was prepared by boiling EB suspensions in a water bath for 10 minutes followed by removal of bacterial debris via centrifugation. HeLa or McCoy cells (ATCC) were cultured in Minimal Essential Medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 10 μg/ml gentamicin and grown at 37°C in 5% CO2.

Construction of plasmids and oligonucleotides used in transfection experiments

Chlamydial open reading frame (orf) designations will be in italics and will reflect their numerical assignment in the C. trachomatis genome sequence presented by Stephens et al. [27]. The single C. muridarum orf tested (TC0495) was as predicted using the sequence of Read et al. [28]. The encoded chlamydial protein will be shown in regular text and will be followed by a "p". The plasmid pcDNA4/HisMaxC (Invitrogen) was used for cloning and expression of intact or truncated coding regions of C. trachomatis CT223, CT224, CT225, CT226, CT227, CT228, CT229, incA, incC, C. caviae incA, incB, incC, and Aequorea victoria gfp genes. Plasmids were constructed that encoded the carboxy terminal 179 and 56 amino acids of CT223p (CT223/179p and CT223/56p, respectively), and the amino acids between positions 91 and 214 of CT223p (CT223/91p). pcDNA4/HisMaxC encodes a polyhistidine tag that was fused to the amino terminus of each recombinant polypeptide tested. Oligonucleotides were designed to include appropriate restriction sites for cloning (Table 1). PCR reactions were carried out using Pfx polymerase and chlamydial genomic DNA as template, and the entire coding sequence as predicted from the serovar D genome sequence was used to define the orfs. All constructs were confirmed by nucleotide sequence analysis.
Table 1

Oligonucleotides used for amplification of inc genes by PCR.

Name/Site

Sequence

Target Gene

DA71 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCttgagatctagaaaagaagc

CT223 C. trachomatis

DA97 Kpn I

agcaGGTACCaatggtgagtttagcagg

CT223 C. trachomatis

DA116 Eco RV

agcaGATATCctacacccgagagccattg

CT223 C. trachomatis

DA119 Eco RV

agcaGATATCctaattagccgttttcagatt

CT223/179 C. trachomatis

DA121 Eco RV

agcaGATATCctactcttctatctgctcttt

CT223/91 C. trachomatis

DA122 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCatggagcttaaagctttagag

CT223/56 C. trachomatis

DA76 Bam HI

agcaGGATCCttattttttacgacgtgc

CT229 C. trachomatis

DA99 Kpn I

agcaGGTACCaatgagctgttctaataa

CT229 C. trachomatis

DA98 Bam HI

agcaGGATCCatgagtactactattgg

CT228 C. trachomatis

DA74 Pst I

agcaCTGCAGctaagaagcttggttgtc

CT228 C. trachomatis

DA 131 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCatgtcttatcttttttcc

CT227 C. trachomatis

DA 132 Eco RV

agcaGATATCtcatgagacacttatcac

CT227 C. trachomatis

DA 129 EcoR I

agcaGAATTCatgttggccttttttcga

CT226 C. trachomatis

DA130 Eco RV

agcaGATATCttatatcagactttccaa

CT226 C. trachomatis

DA127 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCatggtggctaacaactttatt

CT225 C. trachomatis

DA128 Eco RV

agcaGATATCttaatcccacccatgttt

CT225 C. trachomatis

DA125 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCatgagttttgttggaagt

CT224 C. trachomatis

DA126 Xho l

agcaCTCGAGctaatcattgggaaatga

CT224 C. trachomatis

DA34 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCatgacaacgcctactact

incA C. trachomatis

DA21 Eco RV

agcaGATATCctaggagctttttgtggg

incA C. trachomatis

DA22 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCggcaacgttatgacgtc

incC C. trachomatis

DA23 Eco RV

agcaGATATCttagcttacatatatttg

incC C. trachomatis

JL003 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCatgacagtatccacaaa

incA C. caviae

JL010 Eco RV

agcaGATATCacttaactatctttatc

incA C. caviae

JL007 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCatgtcaacaacaccatc

incB C. caviae

JL006 Eco RV

agcaGATATCttaagattctgtttgat

incB C. caviae

JL014 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCatgacctctgtaagaga

incC C. caviae

JL013 Eco RV

agcaGATATCtaaatgtccggtaggag

incC C. caviae

DA114 Eco RI

agcaGAATTCatggtgagcaagggcga

GFP

DA115 Eco RV

agcaGATATCctacttgtacagctccatg

GFP

The restriction sites built into oligonucleotides for cloning purposes are shown in capital letters.

Antibodies, transfection experiments and immunofluorescence microscopy

Monoclonal antibody recognizing chlamydial lipopolysaccharide was a gift from Harlan Caldwell of the Rocky Mountain laboratories, Hamilton, MT. Monoclonal antibody A57B9 (anti-HSP60) recognizes a genus common epitope on chlamydial HSP60 protein [25]. Monoclonal antibodies used in the analysis of CT223p localization in C. trachomatis-infected HeLa or McCoy cells were produced and used as previously described [25]. Rabbit polyclonal anti-CT223p antisera was generated against the peptide sequence NH3-NGINDLSPAPEAKKTGSGL and were produced commercially (Proteintech, Chicago, IL). For these experiments, cells were infected with chlamydiae and incubated for time periods indicated in the figure legends. Cells were then fixed with 100% methanol and used for immunofluorescence.

Transfection of plasmids into HeLa or McCoy cells grown on sterile glass coverslips was conducted using Lipofectamine 2000 (Gibco) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Transfected cells were incubated for 36 hours and then fixed with methanol. The efficiency of transfection was determined by labeling with monoclonal anti-6-His antibody (Clontech) and secondary FITC or TRITC fluorescent antibodies (Southern Biotechnology Associates) to detect the product of the transgene. Monoclonal anti-γ-tubulin antibodies (Sigma) were used to detect centrosomes. Cells expressing gfp were analyzed without labeling. Coverslips were examined under 1000× magnification using a Leica fluorescence microscope and images were collected using the SPOT digital camera system (Diagnostic Instruments Inc., Sterling Heights, MI). The rates of cells with a polynuclear phenotype were determined by counting transfected cells with two or more nuclei among the total population of transfected cells.

Statistical analysis

The number of transfected cells having a polynuclear phenotype was evaluated in at least three independent experiments for each plasmid construct tested. A total of at least 500 individual transfected cells were counted for each tested plasmid construct. Standard deviations were calculated for each individual plasmid construct examined and the significance of differences between means was evaluated using both the Student's t-test and the Kruskall-Wallis test, as calculated using the Instat software program (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Results

Examination of the association between infection and a reduced rate of cytokinesis

The block in cytokinesis identified by Greene and Zhong [13] was tested using laboratory prototype strains (LGV-434 and D/UW3) and a recent clinical isolate {J(s)6686}. In experiments with multiplicities of infection of approximately 3, an increase in the polynuclear phenotype was verified both qualitatively (Fig. 1A) and quantitatively (Fig. 1B). These results are consistent with their data using laboratory strains and confirm that C. trachomatis infection blocks or slows cytokinesis in infected cells.
Figure 1

Confirmation of the polynuclear phenotype in cells infected with different C. trachomatis strains. Panel A: Fluorescence micrograph of C. trachomatis strain LGV-434 inclusion (anti-LPS, red) within a GFP-positive cell (green), showing three nuclei (blue). The scale bar indicates 10 microns. Panel B: The percentage of polynuclear cells 30 h after infection of HeLa cells with different C. trachomatis at an MOI of 3. Strains D/UW3 and J(s)6686 are shown, along with mock-infected cells. Statistical significance is indicated with the asterisk above the individual treatment groups, as compared to mock-transfected cells (Student's t-test, p < 0.001). Similar levels of significance were observed in a Kruskall-Wallis test (not shown).

Distribution of CT223p at the inclusion membrane varies in different C. trachomatis strains

CT223p is localized to the inclusion membrane in cells infected by C. trachomatis at time points after 8 hours post infection (p.i.). Consistent with our previous work [25], patches of CT223p protein are readily detectable at time points 12 h p.i. and later (Fig. 2A–D). The localization of CT223p is different in cells infected by representatives of different C. trachomatis serovars. In cells fixed at early and middle time points p.i., the labeling in cells infected by different serovars is similar and is manifested as dash-like or patchy localization of protein at the inclusion surface (Fig. 2A, C). At late time points however, a difference becomes apparent, as the labeling CT223p of a serovar J isolate (Fig. 2D) becomes more diffuse than in isolates of serovar L2 (Fig. 2B) and serovar D (not shown). These differences in labeling are independent of cell type (either McCoy or HeLa) or fixative (paraformaldehyde or methanol).
Figure 2

Expression of CT223 at different times post infection and differential reactivity with specific antibodies. DNA in all panels is labeled with DAPI (blue) and the bar in panel F represents 10 microns in each image. Cells were infected at an MOI of approximately 0.2 and fixed with 100% methanol prior to antibody labeling. Panels A-D: Fluorescent microscopy of McCoy cells infected with either strain LGV-434 (A, B) or J/UW36 (C, D). Cells were fixed at different times p.i. (A: 12 h, C: 18 h, B, D: 38 h). In panels A-D, cells were labeled with monoclonal anti-CT223p antibody (green) and anti-HSP60 (red). Note that labeling of CT223p is patchy in each strain at the early times points p.i. (A, C) but the labeling is distinct between strains at 38 h p.i. (B, D). Panels E-H: Cells were infected with strain J/UW36 (E, F) or J(s)1980 (G, H) and fixed 30 hours p.i. Cells were then labeled with either polyclonal anti-CT223p antisera (E, G) or monoclonal anti-CT223p antibody (F, H), both of which are labeled red. Note that CT223p is labeled by the polyclonal antisera in each strain, while the monoclonal anti-CT223p does not label the protein in strain J(s)1980.

We have shown that CT223p in certain strains – including J(s)1980 and J(s)6686 – is not recognized in fluorescent microscopic analysis using two different anti-CT223p monoclonal antibodies [25, 29] (Fig. 2F, H). However, peptide-specific polyclonal antibodies demonstrate that the protein is produced in all tested strains (Fig. 2E, G).

Delivery of full length and carboxy-terminal C. trachomatis CT223p to the host cell cytosol alters host cell phenotype

Plasmids encoding CT223p from several C. trachomatis strains were transfected into both McCoy or HeLa cells and the effect on cellular cytokinesis was observed using fluorescent microscopy. Transfection with each of these plasmids led to a high proportion of multinucleate cells 30 hours post transfection (Fig. 3A). A similar phenotype was observed when cells were transfected with plasmids encoding the carboxy-terminal tail of CT223p (Fig. 3B). The average number of polynuclear cells following expression of a CT223 transgene was approximately 20%, regardless of the isolate from which the gene was amplified (Figs. 4 and 5). In contrast, cells transfected with a plasmid encoding GFP, or cells transfected with an empty vector (mock transfected) as control, all had levels of polynuclear cells of approximately 2–4%.
Figure 3

Cytosolic production of CT223p and CT223/179p from C. trachomatis serovar D/UW3 leads to a multinuclear phenotype within mammalian cells. The vector pcDNA4/HisMaxC was used in each construct. Full length CT223p (panel A) and CT223/179p (panel B) were produced within cells following transfection of pcDNA4-based plasmids. Each was detected with anti-6 × His monoclonal antibodies (red). Microtubules were detected by labeling with specific anti-tubulin antibodies (green). The nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue). Panel A; McCoy cell transfected with pcDNA4/HisMaxC encoding CT223p. Three nuclei are localized inside of a single cell expressing CT223. Panel B; McCoy cells transfected with pcDNA4/HisMaxC encoding carboxy-terminal CT223/179p. The scale bar in B indicates 10 microns for each panel.

Figure 4

Quantification of multinuclear cells following expression of different inc genes in McCoy cells. This graph represents percentage of polynuclear cells among McCoy cells following transfection of pcDNA4/HisMaxC-based plasmids encoding different Inc proteins. Unless indicated, the sequences were derived from the published C. trachomatis D/UW3 genome sequence. Statistical significance is indicated with the asterisk above the individual treatment groups, as compared to pCDNA-transfected cells (Student's t-test, p < 0.01).

Figure 5

Quantification of multinuclear cells following expression in McCoy cells of CT223 alleles from different C. trachomatis strains. Statistical significance is indicated with the asterisk above the individual treatment groups, as compared to pcDNA-transfected cells (Student's t-test, p < 0.01).

The multinuclear phenotype was manifested by the carboxy-terminal 179 amino acids of CT223p (Fig. 4). A reduced but still significant level of multinuclear cells were identified in cells transfected with a plasmid encoding only the carboxy-terminal 56 amino acids of CT223p, but, transfection of a plasmid encoding an internal fragment of CT223p (CT223/CT91p) did not lead to a significant level of multinuclear cells. These data suggest that the domain of the protein responsible for blocking cytokinesis was present in the carboxy-terminal 56 amino acids.

Cytosolic expression of other incs

The orf encoding CT223p is within a likely operon encoding known and candidate inc genes CT223–CT227, and is adjacent to a very early operon containing two inc genes (CT228 and CT229). We tested each orf in these operons for an association with a polynuclear phenotype. Each orf was expressed in transfected cells and there was no apparent difference in expression level, based on fluorescence microscopy of transfected cells (not shown). Orfs CT224 and CT225 also were associated with a reduced but still statistically significant percentage of polynuclear cells in a transfected population (Fig. 4). None of the other tested orfs were associated with an increased number of polynuclear cells.

The same approach was used for testing the effects on cell cytokinesis of other Inc proteins. HeLa or McCoy cells transfected with plasmids encoding each protein from C. trachomatis incA and incC, and C. caviae incA, incB and incC were compared with cells expressing full length and truncated CT223. None of these plasmids led to an increase in polynuclear cells relative to controls (Fig. 4).

The CT223 coding sequence from different C. trachomatis strains encode proteins with up to 5% difference in amino acid sequence (22). We therefore tested plasmids encoding CT223p from strains with known amino acid sequence differences for their ability to block cytokinesis. Transfection of plasmids encoding each CT223p sequence was associated with an increase in multinucleate cells (Fig. 5). In contrast, transfection of a plasmid expressing C. muridarum TC0495, which is a syntenous, apparent CT223 homolog (less than 30% predicted amino acid sequence identity), did not lead to an increase in the number of multinucleate cells relative to controls (Fig. 5).

Cells producing CT223p and CT223/179p have increased numbers of centrosomes

To further explore the multinuclear phenotype, cells expressing CT223 were labeled with antibodies specific against γ-tubulin. In contrast to α- and β-tubulin, which are structural components of microtubules, one of the functions of γ-tubulin is the nucleation of microtubule growth in all eukaryotes [30]. The microtubular organizing center, or centrosome, can therefore be identified with antibodies to γ-tubulin. We conducted transfection experiments with plasmids encoding both full length CT223p and the truncated CT223/179p molecule, and these cells also had statistically significant increases in the number of centrosomes, relative to control transfections (Fig. 6). These results are consistent with those of Grieshaber et al. [14], who demonstrated that there are centrosomal supranumeracy defects in C. trachomatis-infected cells.
Figure 6

Centrosome supranumeracy in cells transfected with plasmids encoding C. trachomatis serovar D CT223p and CT223/179p. The vector pcDNA4/HisMaxC was used in each construct. The proteins CT223p and CT223/179p were detected with anti-6 × His monoclonal antibody and are labeled in red. Structures of γ-tubulin were detected by labeling with anti γ-tubulin antibodies and are stained in green. The nuclei are labeled with DAPI (blue). Panel A; McCoy cell transfected with pcDNA4/HisMaxC encoding CT223p. Three nuclei are localized inside of a single cell expressing CT223. Multiple centrosomes are shown with an arrow. The scale bar indicates 10 microns. Panel B; The percentage of cells with multiple centrosomes among cells transfected with plasmids encoding CT223p or CT223/179p (CT223c), or cells transfected with the pcDNA4/HisMaxC vector only (Mock). The vertical axis indicates the percent of cells that had two or more centrosomes. At least 500 cells were tested for each construct. The proportions of cells containing 2 or more centrosomes were significantly different than the mock-transfected cells for both the full length and truncated CT223 sequences. Statistical significance is indicated with the asterisk above the individual treatment groups, as compared to mock-transfected cells (Student's t-test, p < 0.001).

Discussion

CT223p is a chlamydial Inc protein that varies antigenically but is produced by all tested C. trachomatis isolates. The protein was detected in our analysis at 8 h p.i. (not shown) and was abundant on the inclusion membrane at all subsequent time points. This is consistent with the transcriptional profiling of Belland et al. [26], who demonstrate that the transcript for CT223 is first detected 8 h p.i. and remains actively transcribed for the rest of the developmental cycle. The gene is clustered with a set of orfs (CT223–CT229) encoding known or candidate inclusion membrane proteins that are only found in the C. trachomatis and C. muridarum genomes [24]. CT223p is localized as patches or short ribbon-like distribution in all strains examined prior to 30 h p.i. At later time points the protein is differently distributed in different strains, shown in this work in a comparison between a serovar J strain and a serovar L2 strain. Tested isolates of serovar D appear similarly to the serovar L2 strain (not shown).

The ability of C. trachomatis to affect the mammalian cell cycle has been documented by several authors. Greene and Zhong [13] established that infection by C. trachomatis affects host cell cytokinesis in a multiplicity of infection-dependent manner, results that were confirmed in our work (Fig. 1). Grieshaber et al. [14] demonstrated that chlamydial inclusions associate with the centrosome leading to increased numbers of centrosomes and chromosome segregation defects in infected cells. Molecular interactions between chlamydiae and host molecules important in cell division were explored by Balsara et al. [15] who showed that chlamydial infection leads to alterations in the abundance of cyclin-dependent kinases and to the cleavage of cyclin B1. However, any chlamydial proteins that might participate in the alteration of the host cell cycle have not been identified.

While it is possible that the observed multinuclear phenotype is a function of cellular fusion, as opposed to inhibition of cytokinesis, Greene and Zhong [13] discuss several lines of evidence that point to the latter possibility. This includes the lack of observed fusion intermediates, the presence of mitotic forms, and normal DNA synthesis in chlamydiae-infected host cells. These observations support the likelihood that cells are being blocked in a terminal state of division, as opposed to being stimulated to fusion with neighboring cells, following chlamydial infection.

CT223p was first examined as a candidate Inc protein because of the presence of an amino-terminal bi-lobed hydrophobic domain that is proposed to be a membrane anchor for Incs [25]. Like many Incs, CT223p also contains a long carboxy-terminal tail that is largely hydrophilic. It is likely that this carboxy-terminal region of the protein is responsible for direct interactions between Incs and proteins in the host cell cytosol, a property shown to be true for tested Inc proteins [7, 21, 22]. Transfection of cells with plasmids encoding only the carboxy-terminal 179 amino acids or (to a lesser extent) the 56 carboxy-terminal amino acids of CT223p led to increased accumulation of host cell nuclei within cells. We have sequence data for CT223p from several C. trachomatis isolates and, while there is sequence variation among strains, the carboxy-terminal third of the protein is highly conserved [[29]; data not shown].

Two other Inc proteins, CT224p and CT225p, also affected host cell cytokinesis, although the effect was less than that observed with CT223p. These proteins are encoded sequentially in the C. trachomatis genome and are unique to this species. However, the predicted protein sequences of these three proteins share very limited primary amino acid identity. In contrast, the protein product of C. muridarum orf TC0495, an apparent homolog of CT223 that is encoded in a syntenous operon [29] did not block cytokinesis in our assays. The degree of identity between CT223p and TC0495p is not high, and it is likely that key structures between the two proteins are not conserved in a way that allows the C. muridarum protein to affect cytokinesis in this assay. The degree of identity among CT223p, CT224p and CT225p is even lower, and, therefore, it is even less intuitive that these proteins would share a common phenotype when produced within mammalian cells. Therefore, the molecular mechanisms associated with the inhibition of cytokinesis observed in these studies remain unclear.

There are many possible steps in the complicated process of cell division that might be affected by the Incs that affect cytokinesis. The cell cycle is under control of a family of protein kinases known as Cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), which are under control of various regulatory proteins such as CAK and CKIs [31, 32]. Some of these proteins are differently processed or differently abundant in chlamydiae-infected vs. uninfected cultured cells [15]. We hypothesize that CT223p and other Inc proteins directly or indirectly disrupt Cdk, cyclin, or possibly other protein functions and, thus, affect cell cycle control. We are currently using surrogate systems to identify possible host cell cycle-specific proteins that interact directly with CT223p at the inclusion membrane surface.

Conclusion

Plasmid-based expression of the chlamydial inclusion membrane protein CT223p caused a reduction in mammalian cell cytokinesis in vitro. Other Inc proteins had a lesser effect on cytokinesis in this assay. These results support the conclusion that Ct223 expression by C. trachomatis and localization of the protein to the inclusion membrane is associated with the observed inhibition of host cell cytokinesis in C. trachomatis-infected host cells.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by P.H.S. grants AI42869 and AI48769, and through the Oregon State University Department of Microbiology Tartar Scholarship Fund. We thank Dr. Aishu Ramakrishnan and all members of the Rockey laboratory for technical assistance and support. Dr. Hencelyn Chu is acknowledged for coordinating the production and testing of the polyclonal anti-CT223p antisera.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology, Oregon State University
(2)
Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University
(3)
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health &, Science University

References

  1. Valdivia RH: Chlamydia effector proteins and new insights into chlamydial cellular microbiology. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2008, 11 (1): 53-59.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Fields KA, Hackstadt T: The chlamydial inclusion: escape from the endocytic pathway. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2002, 18: 221-245.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mabey D: Trachoma: recent developments. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008, 609: 98-107.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Stamm WE: Chlamydia trachomatis infections: progress and problems. J Infect Dis. 1999, 179 (Suppl 2): S380-383.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Alzhanov D, Barnes J, Hruby DE, Rockey DD: Chlamydial development is blocked in host cells transfected with Chlamydophila caviae incA. BMC Microbiol. 2004, 4: 24-PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Sisko JL, Spaeth K, Kumar Y, Valdivia RH: Multifunctional analysis of Chlamydia-specific genes in a yeast expression system. Mol Microbiol. 2006, 60 (1): 51-66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Delevoye C, Nilges M, Dautry-Varsat A, Subtil A: Conservation of the biochemical properties of IncA from Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia caviae: oligomerization of IncA mediates interaction between facing membranes. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (45): 46896-46906.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Li Z, Chen C, Chen D, Wu Y, Zhong Y, Zhong G: Characterization of fifty putative inclusion membrane proteins encoded in the Chlamydia trachomatis genome. Infect Immun. 2008, 76 (6): 2746-2757.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cortes C, Rzomp KA, Tvinnereim A, Scidmore MA, Wizel B: Chlamydia pneumoniae inclusion membrane protein Cpn0585 interacts with multiple Rab GTPases. Infect Immun. 2007, 75 (12): 5586-5596.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Fields KA, Mead DJ, Dooley CA, Hackstadt T: Chlamydia trachomatis type III secretion: evidence for a functional apparatus during early-cycle development. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 48 (3): 671-683.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell S, Richmond SJ, Yates P: The development of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions within the host eukaryotic cell during interphase and mitosis. J Gen Microbiol. 1989, 135 (5): 1153-1165.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Horoschak KD, Moulder JW: Division of single host cells after infection with chlamydiae. Infect Immun. 1978, 19 (1): 281-286.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Greene W, Zhong G: Inhibition of host cell cytokinesis by Chlamydia trachomatis infection. J Infect. 2003, 47 (1): 45-51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Grieshaber SS, Grieshaber NA, Miller N, Hackstadt T: Chlamydia trachomatis causes centrosomal defects resulting in chromosomal segregation abnormalities. Traffic. 2006, 7 (8): 940-949.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Balsara ZR, Misaghi S, Lafave JN, Starnbach MN: Chlamydia trachomatis infection induces cleavage of the mitotic cyclin B1. Infect Immun. 2006, 74 (10): 5602-5608.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Koskela P, Anttila T, Bjorge T, Brunsvig A, Dillner J, Hakama M, Hakulinen T, Jellum E, Lehtinen M, Lenner P: Chlamydia trachomatis infection as a risk factor for invasive cervical cancer. Int J Cancer. 2000, 85 (1): 35-39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Markowska J, Fischer N, Markowski M, Nalewaj J: The role of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the development of cervical neoplasia and carcinoma. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2005, 9 (1): 83-86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Paavonen J: Chlamydia trachomatis and cancer. Sex Transm Infect. 2001, 77 (3): 154-156.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rockey DD, Scidmore MA, Bannantine JP, Brown WJ: Proteins in the chlamydial inclusion membrane. Microbes Infect. 2002, 4 (3): 333-340.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Rzomp KA, Moorhead AR, Scidmore MA: The GTPase Rab4 interacts with Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion membrane protein CT229. Infect Immun. 2006, 74 (9): 5362-5373.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Hackstadt T, Scidmore-Carlson MA, Shaw EI, Fischer ER: The Chlamydia trachomatis IncA protein is required for homotypic vesicle fusion. Cell Microbiol. 1999, 1 (2): 119-130.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Scidmore MA, Hackstadt T: Mammalian 14-3-3beta associates with the Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion membrane via its interaction with IncG. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 39 (6): 1638-1650.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Suchland RJ, Rockey DD, Bannantine JP, Stamm WE: Isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis that occupy nonfusogenic inclusions lack IncA, a protein localized to the inclusion membrane. Infect Immun. 2000, 68 (1): 360-367.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rockey DD, Alzhanov D: Proteins in the chlamydial inclusion membrane. Chlamydia: Genomics and Pathogenesis. Edited by: Bavoil P, Wyrick P. 2006, Norfolk, U.K.: Horizon PressGoogle Scholar
  25. Bannantine JP, Griffiths RS, Viratyosin W, Brown WJ, Rockey DD: A secondary structure motif predictive of protein localization to the chlamydial inclusion membrane. Cell Microbiol. 2000, 2 (1): 35-47.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Belland RJ, Zhong G, Crane DD, Hogan D, Sturdevant D, Sharma J, Beatty WL, Caldwell HD: Genomic transcriptional profiling of the developmental cycle of Chlamydia trachomatis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (14): 8478-8483.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Stephens RS, Kalman S, Lammel C, Fan J, Marathe R, Aravind L, Mitchell W, Olinger L, Tatusov RL, Zhao Q: Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science. 1998, 282 (5389): 754-759.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Read TD, Brunham RC, Shen C, Gill SR, Heidelberg JF, White O, Hickey EK, Peterson J, Utterback T, Berry K: Genome sequences of Chlamydia trachomatis MoPn and Chlamydia pneumoniae AR39. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (6): 1397-1406.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Rockey DD, Viratyosin W, Bannantine JP, Suchland RJ, Stamm WE: Diversity within inc genes of clinical Chlamydia trachomatis variant isolates that occupy non-fusogenic inclusions. Microbiology. 2002, 148 (Pt 8): 2497-2505.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Raynaud-Messina B, Merdes A: Gamma-tubulin complexes and microtubule organization. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007, 19 (1): 24-30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Dobashi Y: Cell cycle regulation and its aberrations in human lung carcinoma. Pathol Int. 2005, 55 (3): 95-105.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Golias CH, Charalabopoulos A, Charalabopoulos K: Cell proliferation and cell cycle control: a mini review. Int J Clin Pract. 2004, 58 (12): 1134-1141.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Alzhanov et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement