Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

The presence of the pilus locus is a clonal property among pneumococcal invasive isolates

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Microbiology20088:41

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-8-41

©  Aguiar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

  • Received: 31 October 2007
  • Accepted: 28 February 2008
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Pili were recently recognized in Streptococcus pneumoniae and implicated in the virulence of this bacterium, which led to the proposal of using these antigens in a future pneumococcal vaccine. However, pili were found to be encoded by the rlrA islet that was not universally distributed in the species. We examined the distribution of the pilus islet, using the presence of the rlrA gene as a marker for the locus, among a collection of invasive isolates recovered in Portugal and analyzed its association with capsular serotypes, clusters defined by the pulsed-field gel electrophoretic profiles (PFGE) and multilocus sequence types.

Results

Only a minority of the isolates were positive for the presence of the rlrA gene (27%). There was a high correspondence between the serotype and the presence or absence of rlrA (Wallace coefficient, W = 0.778). In particular, there was an association between the presence of rlrA and the vaccine serotypes 4, 6B, 9V and 14 whereas the gene was significantly absent from other serotypes, namely 1, 7F, 8, 12B and 23F, a group that included a vaccine serotype (23F) and serotype 1 associated with enhanced invasiveness. Even within serotypes, there was variation in the presence of the pilus islet between PFGE clones and a higher Wallace coefficient (W = 0.939) indicates that carriage of the islet is a clonal property of pneumococci. Analysis of rlrA negative isolates revealed heterogeneity in the genomic region downstream of the rfl gene, the region where the islet is found in other isolates, compatible with recent loss of the islet in some lineages.

Conclusion

The pilus islet is present in a minority of pneumococcal isolates recovered from human invasive infections and is therefore not an essential virulence factor in these infections. Carriage of the pilus islet is a clonal property of pneumococci that may vary between isolates expressing the same serotype and loss and acquisition of the islet may be ongoing.

Keywords

  • Clonal Structure
  • Pneumococcal Isolate
  • Invasive Isolate
  • Pilus Locus
  • PFGE Cluster

Background

Non-flagellar polymeric cell-surface organelles designated as pili were initially identified in Gram-negative bacteria. In the last decade, pilus-like surface structures have been described in Gram-positive bacteria like Corynebacterium spp., Actinomyces spp. and several streptococcal species [1], but only recently were pili identified in the major pathogenic species of the genus: Streptococcus pyogenes, Lancefield group A [2]; Streptococcus agalactiae, Lancefield group B [3] and Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) [4].

In S. pneumoniae pili are encoded by the rlrA pathogenicity islet, a 14.2 kb region composed of 7 genes encoding a putative transcriptional regulator (RlrA), 3 LPXTG surface proteins with weak homology to microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules – MSCRAMMs (RrgA, RrgB and RrgC) and 3 sortases (SrtB, SrtC and SrtD) [4–6]. Pneumococcal pili have the appearance of flexible rods ranging from 0.3 μm to 3 μm that are formed by a transpeptidase reaction involving sortase-mediated covalent cross-linking of the proteins containing the LPXTG-like motif and several lines of evidence suggest a one-to-one sortase-to-surface-protein correspondence for the proteins encoded by the islet [7].

The rlrA gene was identified in the original signature tagged mutagenesis study as an essential virulence gene in murine models of infection [5]. Later studies confirmed that the RlrA protein acted as a transcription factor recognizing several promoters within the rlrA islet and showed it to be essential for wild-type levels of expression of the pili structural genes and associated sortases [6]. The product of the mgrA gene, located outside the rlrA islet, was shown to act as a transcriptional repressor of the islet genes, including rlrA, being responsible for the silencing of the locus in the absence of RlrA [8].

The presence of the rlrA pathogenicity islet was shown to influence pneumococcal capacity to adhere to human lung epithelial cells [4, 8]. Mouse models of pneumococcal pneumonia and bacteremia have also suggested a role of pili in virulence and host inflammatory responses [4, 5]. More recently, immunization of mice with pilus structural antigens was shown to induce protection against lethal challenge by piliated strains [9]. Moreover, these studies indicate that vaccination with the pilus subunits offers the same protection as vaccination with heat killed bacteria, raising the possibility of using pilus antigens in a multivalent pneumococcal vaccine [9].

In spite of these favorable results, early genomic studies indicated that the rlrA islet was not present in all pneumococcal isolates, suggesting that it could have been acquired by horizontal gene transfer [10] and raising a cautionary note concerning the use of pilus antigens in any future vaccine. A survey for the distribution of the sortase genes identified the srtA gene in all tested bacteria, but the sortases associated with the rlrA islet were present in only 17% of the isolates tested [11]. A recent study, specifically designed to evaluate the distribution of the rlrA islet among pneumococcal isolates associated with colonization and infections in Native Americans, found that only 21% of the isolates were positive for rrgC, a gene encoding a pilus structural protein, and that there was an association between the presence of this gene and the serotypes included in the seven-valent conjugate vaccine [12]. However, the same study could not show a difference in the presence of rrgC between the isolates recovered from the nasopharynx and those recovered from sterile sites. In contrast, the mgrA gene encoding the transcriptional repressor of the rlrA islet seems to be universally distributed within S. pneumoniae [8].

In view of these findings, a better understanding of the distribution of the pilus islet in the invasive pneumococcal population will help in the evaluation of its proposed role as a virulence factor and as a potential vaccine candidate. In the present study, we determined the prevalence of the rlrA gene in a recent collection of invasive isolates from both children and adults with the aim of identifying associations between the presence of the pilus islet and serotype, antimicrobial resistance or clonal types defined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST).

Results

Distribution of the rlrAislet among invasive pneumococci

Only a small portion (27%) of our invasive isolates was rlrA positive and a total of 355 (73%) isolates were found to lack the pilus islet by Southern blot hybridization and PCR amplification of the rlrA gene (Additional file 1: Southern hybridization of a representative set of isolates with the rlrA gene probe.). A group of 39 isolates representative of the diversity found among the rlrA positive isolates (n = 128) was subject to long-range PCR. All isolates yielded fragments larger than 14 kb compatible with the presence of the entire pilus locus (data not shown), confirming that the presence of the rlrA gene is a good marker for the presence of the entire pilus islet.

Overall rlrA positive isolates were found in 11 serotypes of the 41 serotypes in our collection (Additional file 2: Characteristics of the clones where the pilus locus was identified.). Isolates expressing serotypes 1, 3, 4, 6A, 6B, 9V, 13, 14, 19A, 19F, 35B were shown to carry the rlrA gene as well as non-typable isolates, but 83% of the rlrA positive isolates expressed vaccine serotypes (4, 6B, 9V, 14, and 19F). The proportion of isolates carrying the pilus islet among isolates of the same serotype was variable (Figure 1), but overall serotype was a good predictor of the presence or absence of the pilus islet, as indicated by the high Wallace coefficient (W = 0.778).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Frequency of the rlrA islet among serotypes in which at least one rlrA positive isolate was found. Black bars indicate the number of isolates positive for the presence of the rlrA islet. White bars indicate the number of isolates negative for the presence of the rlrA islet.

Although there were differences in the overall proportion of isolates carrying the pilus islet between the isolates recovered from children < 6 yrs. old (37%) and from adults (24%) (p = 0.026), we could not shown differences between the two age groups when we considered the proportion of rlrA positive isolates stratified by serotype using the Mantel-Haenszel test (p = 0.200), indicating that the overall disparity is due to a different distribution of serotypes in the two age groups.

In order to identify which serotypes were associated with the presence of the rlrA islet, odds ratios were calculated. An OR > 1 implies that the serotype is associated with the presence of rlrA, while an OR < 1 indicates that the serotype is significantly depleted of rlrA positive isolates. According to this analysis, serotypes 4, 6B, 9V and 14 were highly associated with the presence of the pilus islet (p < 0.01 for all serotypes). On the other hand, the rlrA islet was significantly absent from serotypes 1, 7F, 8, 12B and 23F (Table 1).
Table 1

Association of the rlrA islet with serotypes and PFGE clusters

Serotype

OR (95% CI)a

p

STs in PFGE clusterb

OR (95% CI)

p

1

0.22 (0.07 – 0.53)

0.0011

[ST306 + ST228]

0.079 (0.01 – 0.59)

0.0007

3

NSc

 

[ST1220 + ST260] + [ST1230 + ST180]

0.06 (0.01 – 0.44)

< 10-4

4

12.74 (5.05 – 32.12)

< 10-4

ST1221

80.26 (4.72 – 1363.4)

< 10-4

   

ST247

30 (3.8 – 236.84)

< 10-4

6B

7.44 (2.29 – 24.16)

0.0005

ST1224 + ST273

47.33 (2.7 – 830.37)

< 10-4

7F

0 (0 – 0.61)

0.0052

ST191

0 (0.0 – 0.70)

0.0089

8

0 (0 – 0.37)

0.0002

ST53

0 (0.0 – 0.57)

0.0057

9V

14.36 (4.76 – 43.33)

< 10-4

[ST156 + ST557 + ST644 + ST1225]

16.76 (4.80 – 58.54)

< 10-4

12B

0 (0 – 0.70)

0.0089

NSc

NSc

 

14

16.13 (8.50 – 30.63)

< 10-4

[ST156 + ST557 + ST790]

212.4 (28.89 – 1561.8)

< 10-4

23F

0 (0 – 0.44)

0.0006

ST338 + ST1371

0 (0.0 – 0.57)

0.0057

aAn OR of > 1 indicates increased proportion of rlrA positive isolates whereas OR of < 1 indicates decreased proportion of rlrA positive isolates. Only statistically significant results (FDR < 0.05) are presented.

bSTs in PFGE clusters with a Dice similarity coefficient of > 80%. Brackets indicate STs that belong to the same lineage, as defined by eBURST analysis with the complete S. pneumoniae database available at spneumoniae.mlst.net. Only statistically significant results (FDR < 0.05) are presented.

cNS – not significant

Association between the presence of the pilus islet and resistance to antimicrobials

A clear correlation between the presence of rlrA and antimicrobial resistance was noted. We found that most isolates carrying the pilus islet were resistant to at least one antimicrobial – 54% (69/128) were non-susceptible to penicillin, 18% (23/128) were resistant to erythromycin and 17% (22/128) were multi-resistant. This association was further confirmed since the OR calculated for resistance to individual antibiotics and the presence of the pilus islet were mostly > 1 and significant (Table 2).
Table 2

Association of the rlrA islet with antimicrobial resistance

Antibiotic

no. rlrA positive strains/no. resistant isolates (% rlrA positive strains)

no. rlrA positive strains/no. susceptible isolates (% rlrA positive strains)

OR(95% CI)a

p

Penicillin b

69/113 (61)

59/370 (16)

8.27 (5.17 – 13.22)

< 10-4

Erythromycin

23/48 (48)

105/435 (24)

2.89 (1.58 – 5.30)

0.0004

Tetracycline

16/38 (42)

112/445 (25)

2.16 (1.09 – 4.26)

0.023

Chloramphenicol

5/14 (36)

123/469 (26)

NSc

 

Co-trimoxazole

74/106 (70)

54/377 (14)

13.83 (8.35 – 22.91)

< 10-4

MDR d

22/42 (52)

106/441 (44)

3.48 (1.83 – 6.62)

< 10-4

aAn OR of > 1 indicates increased proportion of rlrA positive isolates whereas OR of < 1 indicates decreased proportion of rlrA positive isolates. Only statistically significant results (FDR < 0.05) are presented.

b Both penicillin intermediate and fully resistant isolates were considered resistant for this analysis

cNS – not significant

dMDR – multidrug resistance defined as resistance to at least three different antimicrobial classes considering as resistant to penicillin both intermediate as well as fully resistant isolates

Presence of the pilus islet is a clonal property

Characterization of the genetic lineages of the pneumococcal collection included in the present study had been performed previously [13]. Analysis by genetic lineage of the isolates demonstrated that the presence of the rlrA islet was not only associated with serotype but also with PFGE cluster within each serotype, defined as described previously [13] (Additional file 2 – Characteristics of the clones where the pilus locus was identified – and Additional file 3 – Characteristics of the bacterial clones not associated with the pilus locus). The Wallace coefficient relating the PFGE clusters with the presence or absence of rlrA (W = 0.939) was higher than for serotype (W = 0.778) indicating that the pathogenicity islet is clonally distributed. The value of the Wallace coefficient indicates that only one out of 20 pairs of isolates grouped in the same PFGE cluster will differ in the presence of the rlrA islet in their genome.

To verify if there were PFGE clusters associated with the presence of rlrA, odds ratios were determined and the significant values obtained in this analysis are indicated in Table 1. In some serotypes identified as associated with the presence of the pilus islet, all of the major PFGE clusters showed also a positive association with the presence of rlrA (serotype 4, table 1 and Additional file 2: Characteristics of the clones where the pilus locus was identified.), but in others only some of the PFGE clusters were associated with rlrA (serotype 14, table 1 and Additional file 2: Characteristics of the clones where the pilus locus was identified). The fact that the presence of the rlrA islet is a clonal property is further illustrated by isolates of serotype 3, that is not itself significantly associated with the presence nor with the absence of the rlrA islet, but a clone expressing serotype 3 was found to be significantly depleted of the pilus islet (table 1). Note that the OR values are more extreme when compared with the values calculated for serotype alone, further supporting the notion that the presence of the pilus islet is a clonal property.

Prior work from our group showed that there is a close correspondence between PFGE cluster and ST [13]. The relationships between sequence types have been explored by various methodologies, including eBURST [14] that was specially developed to analyze MLST data and is frequently used to define clonal complexes. An eBURST analysis revealed that all isolates carrying the pilus islet expressing serotypes 9V and 14, which represented 54% (69/128) of the total isolates positive for rlrA, were clonally related and represented clone Spain9V-3 (ST156) [15] (Additional file 2: Characteristics of the clones where the pilus locus was identified.). Another association of the presence of the pilus islet and PMEN clones was observed in serotype 6B where all seven isolates belonging to a PFGE cluster represented by ST1224 and ST273 and a single isolate in a different PFGE cluster, but also exhibiting ST273, were all positive for the presence of rlrA and are related to clone Greece6B-22 [16] (Additional file 2: Characteristics of the clones where the pilus locus was identified.). On the other hand, among serotype 14 isolates related to England14-9 (PFGE cluster represented by ST15 and ST409), and serotype 6B isolates related to Poland6B-20 (PFGE cluster characterized by ST887), no isolates carrying the pilus islet could be found.

Characterization of rlrAnegative isolates

The majority of the isolates were negative for the presence of the rlrA gene (n = 355). To explore the possibility that the rlrA negative isolates still retained parts of the pathogenicity islet, a PCR was performed using a set of primers that flanked the whole islet (Figure 2B and 2C, primers PFL-up and P-dn). All isolates yielded a PCR product and the majority (283 isolates, 80%) originated a product with the same size as strain R6 (Figure 2A, lanes 2 and 4 and figure 2C). The remaining 72 (20%) isolates revealed larger amplification products: 68 presented a product designated type C (figure 2A, lane 3 and figure 2C), while the remaining 4 presented a product designated type B (Figure 2A, lane 1 and figure 2B). In order to determine the genetic differences responsible for the heterogeneity in size of the PCR products, a representative isolate of types B and C was sequenced. The genetic makeup of the various regions is illustrated in figures 2B and 2C.
Figure 2
Figure 2

The genetic structure of the region downstream of the pfl gene where the rlrA islet is found among piliated isolates. Panel A. Agarose gel of the PCR products resulting from the amplification of the region downstream of the pfl gene using primers PFL-up and P-dn. m – DNA ladder (1 kb plus, Invitrogen, Carlsbab, CA). Lane 1 – isolate presenting a region type C. Lane 2 – isolate presenting a region type A. Lane 3 – isolate presenting a region type B. Lane 4 – strain R6. Sizes of the fragments in kilobases are indicated in the left. Panel B. Structure of the region found downstream of the pfl gene in four isolates and designated region type B compared to the rlrA islet and flanking regions of strain TIGR4. Genes are indicated by arrows and primers by vertical lines. Genes encoding proteins with similar functions are represented by the same pattern. The fragments with high DNA similarity between the regions compared are represented by black and grey boxes connected by lines (analysis was performed using the GATA software). Panel C. Structure of the region found downstream of the pfl gene in 68 isolates and designated region type C compared to the corresponding region of strain R6 (region type A).

Both the type B and C regions, contain DNA stretches similar to those found in the 3' region of the rlrA locus of strain TIGR4. These common DNA elements were found to be similar to the region found upstream of the rlrA locus of TIGR4 encoding the IS1167 transposase however, due to mutations and indels, these are no longer capable of producing a full-length functional protein. BLAST searches demonstrated a high number of similarly degraded copies of the IS1167 transposase distributed throughout the available complete genomes of strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (TIGR4, R6 and D39). There is a high identity between the IS1167 degraded transposase sequence found downstream of the rlrA locus in TIGR4 and the one found in the type B region (97% identity in the 1277 nt aligned, with only two single nucleotide gaps). The similarity extends to other coding and non-coding regions found between srtD and spr0470 of TIGR4 (Figure 2B). This observation is compatible with the hypothesis that region type B was generated by the recent loss of the rlrA islet. Further supporting this notion is the observation that this region was found exclusively among the few isolates not carrying the pilus islet among large PFGE clusters of rlrA positive isolates (Additional file 2: Characteristics of the clones where the pilus locus was identified.).

The DNA sequence corresponding to the degraded copy of the IS1167 transposase in region type C differed more extensively from the two discussed above, namely by a 50 nt insertion and a 16 nt deletion. A comparison of the type C region with the corresponding sequence of strain R6 revealed extensive similarity, including the presence of ORF CDS137 and a downstream repeat region found in strain R6 but absent from the pilus locus in strain TIGR4 (Figure 2C). The type C region is therefore closely related to the one found in strain R6 with the exception of the presence of a degraded copy of the IS1167 transposase, suggesting that the region downstream of the pfl gene may constitute a hotspot for recombination events. The type C region was found associated with specific PFGE clusters expressing a limited number of serotypes (Additional file 2 – Characteristics of the clones where the pilus locus was identified – and Additional file 3 – Characteristics of the bacterial clones not associated with the pilus locus.), but this was not an exclusive association since isolates presenting regions type A and C were frequently grouped in the same PFGE cluster. For instance, the largest PFGE cluster in serotype 3 contains almost equal numbers of isolates presenting each of the regions.

Discussion

The long-term efficacy of the seven-valent conjugate vaccine is being challenged by the emergence of infections caused by replacement serotypes not targeted by the vaccine. The difficulty in producing higher valency vaccines and the realization that any polysaccharide based vaccine may be ultimately limited in its efficacy, due to the large number of pneumococcal capsular types, prompted the search for other vaccine targets. Recently, the three structural proteins constituting pneumococcal pili were shown to protect mice against invasive infections and were proposed as potential vaccine candidates [9].

The data presented here argues that the efficacy of such a vaccine would be limited by the small proportion of isolates carrying the pilus islet (27%) and therefore potentially expressing pili, among those causing invasive infections in humans. The strong association of the rlrA islet with four of the seven serotypes included in the conjugate vaccine would further limit the advantages of a pilus component vaccine over the one currently available. Recently, Basset et al. explored the distribution of the rlrA islet, using rrgC as a marker for the presence of the pilus locus [12]. The population analyzed by Basset et al. differed markedly from the one analyzed here by including a large fraction of isolates associated with colonization, a different distribution of serotypes and, most importantly, the genetic makeup of the pneumococcal population was strikingly different with only 15 common STs out of the 158 STs identified overall in the two collections. In spite of these differences, a surprisingly similar proportion of isolates carrying the pilus islet was found among invasive isolates by Basset et al. (24%, n = 123). Taken together the results of the two studies suggest that the pilus does not represent an essential virulence factor for invasive disease in humans, in contrast to previous indications from mouse models [4, 5]. This suggestion receives further support from the observation that the same fraction of isolates associated with asymptomatic carriage were positive for the pilus islet [12].

The collection characterized here was previously analyzed for the phase variant expressed by the isolates [17], another phenotype implicated in enhanced invasiveness. A proportion of opaque variants similar to the one positive for the rlrA gene was found (26%), prompting us to evaluate the association between opacity and the pilus islet. However, no association could be shown between the opacity phenotype of a given isolate and carriage of the pilus islet. In fact, two serotypes found to be associated with predominantly opaque variants, serotype 1 and 4 [17], were found to be significantly depleted of isolates positive for rlrA and strongly associated with the presence of the islet, respectively.

A prior study emphasized the higher prevalence of the pilus islet among the serotypes included in the currently available conjugate vaccine versus all other serotypes [12]. Here we expand these findings by identifying which serotypes are particularly enriched or depleted in the presence of the pilus locus. Specifically, among the seven serotypes included in the conjugate vaccine, although most serotypes are indeed associated with the presence of the pilus locus (4, 6B, 9V and 14), serotype 23F was significantly depleted of the presence of this locus, indicating that an association with the presence of the pilus locus is not a property of all vaccine serotypes, while serotypes 18C and 19F did not reach statistical significance. Interestingly, while vaccine-serotype 14 was associated with the presence of the pilus islet in the present study, the islet was found in less than 10% of the isolates expressing this serotype among a collection of North American isolates [12]. This discrepancy is possibly due to differences in the genetic structure of this serotype in the two collections, as discussed below, and highlights the pitfalls of establishing an association between the presence of the pilus locus and serotype without consideration for the clonal structure of the bacterial population expressing a particular serotype. It is also noteworthy that serotype 1, previously identified as having enhanced invasive disease potential [18], was significantly depleted of isolates carrying the pilus islet (table 1) in contrast to the proposed role of pili as virulence potentiators.

We could also show an association between the presence of the pilus islet and resistance to several antimicrobials, including penicillin (table 2). Such an association was expected since the serotypes where the pilus islet was found also concentrate the majority of resistant isolates. Recently, pili were suggested to play an important role in the dissemination of penicillin non-susceptible isolates in Sweden [19]. The clonal lineage implicated in Sweden was represented by ST156 that was also found to be significantly associated with the presence of the pilus islet in our collection, independently of the serotype expressed by the isolates (serotype 9V or 14, table 1).

An analysis of the genetic backgrounds of the isolates showed that the best predictor of the presence of the pilus islet was the PFGE cluster, independently of the serotype, indicating that this is a clonal property. Particularly interesting, is the fact that different lineages expressing the same serotype can be associated with the presence or absence of the locus, which may confound an analysis of association of the pilus islet with serotype only disregarding the clonal structure of the population. For instance, among the isolates expressing serotype 14, the dominant lineage characterized by ST156 and related STs was associated with the presence of the pilus locus in a serotype independent analysis (table 1). However, in the second most prevalent lineage expressing serotype 14, characterized by ST15 and related STs, the locus is conspicuously absent (Additional file 2: Characteristics of the clones where the pilus locus was identified.). A different clonal structure could thus explain the low prevalence (< 10%) of the pilus locus in serotype 14 in the report of Basset et al. [12] that is in sharp contrast with the high prevalence of the locus in this serotype found in our collection (78%, Additional file 2: Characteristics of the clones where the pilus locus was identified.). Importantly, we also show that some PFGE clusters are significantly depleted in isolates carrying the pilus locus and, since these were the dominant clones among their serotypes, a significant depletion at the serotype level was also evident in most cases (table 1). The only exception was serotype 3 where, in spite of the presence of a dominant clone significantly depleted of the pilus locus, the presence of a minor cluster represented by ST458 constituted exclusively by isolates positive for the pilus islet prevented the association at the serotype level to reach significance. The existence of clones expressing the same serotype associated or depleted in the pilus islet raises the possibility that in other geographic areas with a different clonal structure, the association between particular serotypes and the presence or absence of the pilus locus may be different from the one reported here.

A prior study had suggested a strong association between the PMEN clones and the presence of the pilus islet [12]. In the present collection, the Spain9V-3 clone was found to be strongly associated with the presence of the pilus islet similarly to what was found previously [12, 19], but other PMEN clones found in our collection were devoid of isolates positive for rlrA such as England14-9 and Poland6B-20, so that carriage of the pilus locus is not a universal property of widely disseminated lineages.

Basset et al. discuss the limitations of using the detection of rrgC by PCR as a marker for the presence of the pilus islet [12]. One of the concerns is that this may have been a too broad criterion in that strains that carry the rrgC gene may lack other genes essential for pilus expression. Although our study suffers from the same limitation, the long-range PCR performed on a subset of the isolates positive for the rlrA gene yielded products whose sizes were compatible with the presence of the entire locus, in agreement with previous studies that indicated that the rlrA islet is either present or absent in its entirety [12, 19]. However, the primary concern of Basset et al. was that theirs could have been a too stringent criterion, since strains not containing the rrgC gene or negative by PCR due to variability in this structural gene may still express pili. Our choice of using the presence of rlrA to define piliated isolates was designed to avoid these problems. RlrA is a regulatory protein and it is therefore expected to be more conserved than a structural protein and the presence of this protein was shown to be essential for wild-type levels of expression of the pilus structural genes and associated sortases [6], indicating that isolates lacking this gene would also be impaired in pilus expression. Moreover, the PCR performed using primers targeting conserved DNA regions flanking the rlrA locus conclusively showed that all strains lacking the rlrA gene also lacked all the sortases and structural genes necessary for pilus biosynthesis. Therefore, the 27% of invasive isolates containing the rlrA gene constitute the fraction genetically equipped to express pili, although only the availability of specific antibodies targeting the pilus could determine if this genetic potential was fully realized.

The study of the rlrA negative isolates revealed different genetic organizations of the region where the pilus islet is usually found, suggesting that this region may be a hotspot for DNA insertions and deletions. Transposons and IS elements have been shown to be a frequent cause of duplications and deletions in bacterial chromosomes through homologous recombination [20]. Significantly, the sequence of the IS1167 transposase retained in the 3' region of the pilus locus is severely altered when comparing to the one in the 5' region (fig. 2) which may hinder homologous recombination and stabilize the presence of the pilus locus. Notwithstanding, the distribution and genetic arrangement of region type B, with the presence of CDS283 that was exclusively associated with the pilus locus, suggests that it may have resulted from the recent loss of the pilus islet in some lineages, possibly through intra-chromosomal homologous recombination between the conserved 3' regions of the flanking IS1167 transposase encoding segments or through an error in excision mediated by a functional IS1167 transposase, such as the one putatively encoded in the 5' region of the locus. A recombination event would be expected to retain most of the 3' copy of the IS1167 transposase and the downstream region as was indeed verified (Fig. 2). The DNA sequence of the type C region, that differs from the more common type A region found in strain R6 by the presence of a degraded IS1167 transposase encoding segment, offers limited clues as to its origin. However, the presence of an IS1167 sequence could further promote the acquisition of the pilus islet by providing a region of sequence similarity that could facilitate homologous recombination.

Carriage of the pilus islet was shown to be a clonal property and its association with a widely disseminated pneumococcal clone (Spain9V-3), may indicate that pili could facilitate dissemination or colonization of the host, as suggested recently [19]. The pneumococcal population included in our study was obtained from a period prior to the introduction of the heptavalent vaccine [13, 21]. Since the majority of the isolates positive for the pilus locus expressed vaccine serotypes, a decrease of piliated strains due to vaccine introduction, which was already observed in the USA [12], might be expected. However, some serotypes that are emerging due to vaccine pressure, such as 19A [22, 23], include clones that carried the rlrA islet and the diversity of the region associated with the pilus locus suggests that loss and acquisition of the islet may be ongoing. Since serotype prevalence is changing as a consequence of vaccine introduction [22, 23] the acquisition of the pilus locus by the emerging clones or the increase in incidence of piliated clones may shed light on the role of this surface structure in human infections.

Conclusion

The low prevalence of the rlrA islet in our collection of invasive isolates indicates that the pilus does not represent an essential virulence factor in human infections and that its potential use in a vaccine would offer limited benefits. Carriage of the pilus islet was shown to be a clonal property that may vary between isolates expressing the same serotype. The variable nature of the region downstream of the pfl gene in isolates lacking the pilus islet suggests that acquisition and loss of the islet may be ongoing.

Methods

Bacterial isolates

A collection of 465 invasive pneumococcal isolates recovered during the years of 1999 to 2002 in Portugal were previously described [21]. Additionally, 18 invasive isolates, recovered during the same period, were added to our collection and further characterized (total n = 483). Briefly, 87 isolates were recovered from children < 6 yrs. and 381 from adults (≥ 18 yrs). Overall, serotypes 14, 1, 3, 4, 8, 9V, 23F, 7F, 19A and 12B were the most prevalent by decreasing rank order. The isolates were characterized by a combination of macrorestriction profiling using the SmaI endonuclease and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) [13]. The isolates were analyzed separately by serotype and PFGE-based clusters were defined as isolates with ≥ 80% relatedness on an UPGMA dendrogram constructed using the Dice coefficient. MLST analysis was performed for at least one isolate in each major PFGE cluster (n = 127) and revealed 66 different sequence types (ST) corresponding to 47 different lineages by eBURST analysis [13]. Importantly, a comparison of the clones found in this collection with those found in the United States by Gertz et al. [24] showed that only 11 lineages, as defined by MLST, were common out of a total in excess of 150 STs identified in the two studies. Similarly, a comparison with the study of Basset et al. [12] revealed that only 15 out of the 158 STs identified overall in the two studies were common.

The reference strains TIGR4 [10] and R6 [25] were used as positive and negative controls for the presence of the pilus islet.

Detection of the rlrAislet

Identification of isolates carrying the rlrA islet was performed by southern blot hybridization. Genomic DNA from S. pneumoniae was prepared in agarose plugs as described previously, digested with SmaI and separated by PFGE in a CHEF-DR II apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA) [13]. Following electrophoresis, the DNA was transferred to nylon membranes (Hybond-N+, Amersham Biosciences, Bucks, UK) with a VacuGene system (Pharmacia Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden) and subjected to Southern hybridization under stringent conditions. The probe was constructed using primers RLRA-up (5'-TCT GAT AGA TGA GAC GCT GTT G-3') and RLRA-dn (5'-CTC CGC TTC TTT CTA CTA CAA G-3'), which allowed the amplification of an 1177 bp internal fragment of the rlrA gene using DNA from strain TIGR4 as template (Figure 2B). Labeling and hybridization were performed using ECL direct nucleic acid labeling and detection system (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The molecular size of the hybridization signals and the corresponding SmaI fragments were determined.

For some isolates hybridization yielded ambiguous results, possibly due to problems during blotting of the DNA onto the nylon membranes or degradation of the membranes during storage. In these cases, the rlrA gene was detected by PCR, using RLRA-up and RLRA-dn primers. Template DNA was prepared by diluting 9 μl of an overnight culture in 441 μl of water and boiling of this mixture for 2 min. The PCR reactions were performed in a 50 μl volume containing 20 μl of template solution, 1× reaction buffer (Biotools, Madrid, Spain), 1.25U Tth DNA polymerase (Biotools, Madrid, Spain), 10 mM dNTPs (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) and 20 pmol of each of the primers. The PCR program consisted of 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, followed by 10 min incubation at 72°C.

Characterization of the chromosomal region where the rlrAislet is usually found in non-piliated strains

In order to confirm that the rlrA negative strains did not carry the pilus pathogenicity islet or parts of it, a set of primers that flanked the rlrA pathogenicity islet were developed – PFL-up (5'-ATC TCA TTG ACT ACA CAA GTA TCA CCT C-3') and P-dn (5'-CAA GAG CAT ACT CCA ACT CAT AAA TAT GTG-3') – with the aim of amplifying the entire pilus islet (Figure 2B and 2C). All strains that were negative for the presence of the rlrA gene were subject to PCR with primers PFL-up and P-dn, as well as TIGR4 (piliated control), and R6 (non-piliated control). If the pilus islet or parts of it were absent, the PCR product expected using these primers would be similar to that obtained when using R6 DNA as template (1310 bp). The PCR reactions were performed in a 50 μl volume containing 20 μl of template solution, 1× reaction buffer (Biotools, Madrid, Spain), 1.25U Tth DNA polymerase (Biotools, Madrid, Spain), 10 mM dNTPs (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania) and 20 pmol of each of the primers. The PCR program consisted of 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 3 min, followed by 10 min incubation at 72°C. Whenever no PCR product was obtained using these conditions, and in a subset of the isolates positive for the rlrA gene representing the diversity found within the collection, the reaction was performed in conditions allowing the amplification of fragments larger than 10 kb. In this case DNA was extracted using CTAB [26] and the PCR reaction was prepared using the Expand Long Template PCR System (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturers instructions. The PCR program consisted of incubation at 94°C for 2 min followed by 10 cycles of 94°C for 10 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 13 min, and 20 cycles of 94°C for 15 s, 58°C for 30 s, and 68°C for 13 min with an incremental increase of 20 s per cycle, followed by 7 min incubation at 68°C.

Strains representative of the various sizes of PCR products obtained were sequenced by primer walking. The sequences were compared using BLAST against the available sequence databases at the NCBI to identify similar sequences and to each other using the MEGA [27] and GATA [28] software programs.

Statistical analysis

Wallace coefficients (W) were used to compare partitions. This coefficient indicates the probability that two isolates sharing the same characteristic by a given typing method will also be grouped together by a different typing method [29]. In this study, Wallace coefficients were used to estimate the power of a given typing method in predicting the presence or absence of the pilus locus.

Statistical associations between the presence of the rlrA islet and serotype, PFGE cluster or antimicrobial resistance profile were characterized by odds ratios (OR) with 95% Wald confidence intervals (CI) [30]. For null OR, 95%CI were computed through the Fisher method [31]. OR significance or statistical differences between proportions were tested with the chi-square statistic. The resulting p-values were corrected for multiple testing by controlling the False Discovery Rate (FDR) under or equal to 0.05 through the linear procedure of Benjimini and Hochberg [32]. Difference in proportion of rlrA islet presence in isolates recovered in different age groups, stratifying for serotype was evaluated with the Mantel-Haenszel test [33]. The p-values indicated in the text were considered significant if lower than 0.05.

Wallace coefficient analysis was done in a web application [34] and the remaining statistical tests were executed in the R statistical language using functions implemented in the epitools package [35].

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The sequences of isolates representing the various sizes of the PCR products obtained in rlrA negative isolates were deposited in GenBank with accession numbers EU126839 and EU126840.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

SIA, IS and FRP were supported by grants SFRH/BD/27518/2006, SFRH/BD/14158/2003 and SFRH/BPD/21746/2005, respectively, from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Portugal. Partial support for this work was provided by PREVIS (LSHM-CT-2003-503413 from the European Community), Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (POCTI/ESP/47914) and Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Instituto de Microbiologia, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

References

  1. Telford JL, Barocchi MA, Margarit I, Rappuoli R, Grandi G: Pili in gram-positive pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006, 4: 509-519. 10.1038/nrmicro1443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mora M, Bensi G, Capo S, Falugi F, Zingaretti C, Manetti AG, Maggi T, Taddei AR, Grandi G, Telford JL: Group A Streptococcus produce pilus-like structures containing protective antigens and Lancefield T antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102: 15641-15646. 10.1073/pnas.0507808102.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lauer P, Rinaudo CD, Soriani M, Margarit I, Maione D, Rosini R, Taddei AR, Mora M, Rappuoli R, Grandi G, Telford JL: Genome analysis reveals pili in Group B Streptococcus. Science. 2005, 309: 105-10.1126/science.1111563.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barocchi MA, Ries J, Zogaj X, Hemsley C, Albiger B, Kanth A, Dahlberg S, Fernebro J, Moschioni M, Masignani V, Hultenby K, Taddei AR, Beiter K, Wartha F, von Euler A, Covacci A, Holden DW, Normark S, Rappuoli R, Henriques-Normark B: A pneumococcal pilus influences virulence and host inflammatory responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103: 2857-2862. 10.1073/pnas.0511017103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hava DL, Camilli A: Large-scale identification of serotype 4 Streptococcus pneumoniae virulence factors. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 45: 1389-1406.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hava DL, Hemsley CJ, Camilli A: Transcriptional regulation in the Streptococcus pneumoniae rlrA pathogenicity islet by RlrA. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 413-421. 10.1128/JB.185.2.413-421.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. LeMieux J, Hava DL, Basset A, Camilli A: RrgA and RrgB are components of a multisubunit pilus encoded by the Streptococcus pneumoniae rlrA pathogenicity islet. Infect Immun. 2006, 74: 2453-2456. 10.1128/IAI.74.4.2453-2456.2006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hemsley C, Joyce E, Hava DL, Kawale A, Camilli A: MgrA, an orthologue of Mga, Acts as a transcriptional repressor of the genes within the rlrA pathogenicity islet in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 6640-6647. 10.1128/JB.185.22.6640-6647.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gianfaldoni C, Censini S, Hilleringmann M, Moschioni M, Facciotti C, Pansegrau W, Masignani V, Covacci A, Rappuoli R, Barocchi MA, Ruggiero P: Streptococcus pneumoniae pilus subunits protect mice against lethal challenge. Infect Immun. 2007, 75: 1059-1062. 10.1128/IAI.01400-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Tettelin H, Nelson KE, Paulsen IT, Eisen JA, Read TD, Peterson S, Heidelberg J, DeBoy RT, Haft DH, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Gwinn M, Kolonay JF, Nelson WC, Peterson JD, Umayam LA, White O, Salzberg SL, Lewis MR, Radune D, Holtzapple E, Khouri H, Wolf AM, Utterback TR, Hansen CL, McDonald LA, Feldblyum TV, Angiuoli S, Dickinson T, Hickey EK, Holt IE, Loftus BJ, Yang F, Smith HO, Venter JC, Dougherty BA, Morrison DA, Hollingshead SK, Fraser CM: Complete genome sequence of a virulent isolate of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Science. 2001, 293: 498-506. 10.1126/science.1061217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Paterson GK, Mitchell TJ: The role of Streptococcus pneumoniae sortase A in colonisation and pathogenesis. Microbes Infect. 2006, 8: 145-153. 10.1016/j.micinf.2005.06.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Basset A, Trzcinski K, Hermos C, O'Brien KL, Reid R, Santosham M, McAdam AJ, Lipsitch M, Malley R: Association of the pneumococcal pilus with certain capsular serotypes but not with increased virulence. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45: 1684-1689. 10.1128/JCM.00265-07.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Serrano I, Melo-Cristino J, Carriço JA, Ramirez M: Characterization of the genetic lineages responsible for pneumococcal invasive disease in Portugal. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 1706-1715. 10.1128/JCM.43.4.1706-1715.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Spratt BG, Hanage WP, Li B, Aanensen DM, Feil EJ: Displaying the relatedness among isolates of bacterial species -- the eBURST approach. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004, 241: 129-134. 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.11.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McGee L, McDougal L, Zhou J, Spratt BG, Tenover FC, George R, Hakenbeck R, Hryniewicz W, Lefevre JC, Tomasz A, Klugman KP: Nomenclature of major antimicrobial-resistant clones of Streptococcus pneumoniae defined by the pneumococcal molecular epidemiology network. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 2565-2571. 10.1128/JCM.39.7.2565-2571.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. The PMEN clone list. [http://www.sph.emory.edu/PMEN/pmen_clone_collection.html]
  17. Serrano I, Melo-Cristino J, Ramirez M: Heterogeneity of pneumococcal phase variants in invasive human infections. BMC Microbiol. 2006, 6: 67-10.1186/1471-2180-6-67.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Brueggemann AB, Griffiths DT, Meats E, Peto T, Crook DW, Spratt BG: Clonal relationships between invasive and carriage Streptococcus pneumoniae and serotype- and clone-specific differences in invasive disease potential. J Infect Dis. 2003, 187: 1424-1432. 10.1086/374624.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sjöström K, Blomberg C, Fernebro J, Dagerhamn J, Morfeldt E, Barocchi MA, Browall S, Moschioni M, Andersson M, Henriques F, Albiger B, Rappuoli R, Normark S, Henriques-Normark B: Clonal success of piliated penicillin nonsusceptible pneumococci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104: 12907-12912. 10.1073/pnas.0705589104.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Weinstock GM, Lupski JR: Chromosomal rearrangements. Bacterial genomes - physical structure and analysis. Edited by: Bruijn FJ, Lupski JR and Weinstock GM. 1999, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 112-118.Google Scholar
  21. Serrano I, Ramirez M, The Portuguese Surveillance Group for the Study of Respiratory Pathogens, Melo-Cristino J: Invasive Streptococcus pneumoniae from Portugal: implications for vaccination and antimicrobial therapy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004, 10: 652-656. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.00869.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Whitney CG, Farley MM, Hadler J, Harrison LH, Bennett NM, Lynfield R, Reingold A, Cieslak PR, Pilishvili T, Jackson D, Facklam RR, Jorgensen JH, Schuchat A: Decline in invasive pneumococcal disease after the introduction of protein-polysaccharide conjugate vaccine. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 1737-1746. 10.1056/NEJMoa022823.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Aguiar SI, Serrano I, Pinto FR, Melo-Cristino J, Ramirez M, the Portuguese Surveillance Group for the Study of Respiratory Pathogens: Changes in pneumococcal invasive disease with non-universal vaccination coverage of the seven-valent conjugate vaccine. Submitted-Google Scholar
  24. Gertz RE, McEllistrem MC, Boxrud DJ, Li Z, Sakota V, Thompson TA, Facklam RR, Besser JM, Harrison LH, Whitney CG, Beall B: Clonal distribution of invasive pneumococcal isolates from children and selected adults in the United States prior to 7-valent conjugate vaccine introduction. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 4194-4216. 10.1128/JCM.41.9.4194-4216.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoskins J, Alborn WE, Arnold J, Blaszczak LC, Burgett S, DeHoff BS, Estrem ST, Fritz L, Fu DJ, Fuller W, Geringer C, Gilmour R, Glass JS, Khoja H, Kraft AR, Lagace RE, LeBlanc DJ, Lee LN, Lefkowitz EJ, Lu J, Matsushima P, McAhren SM, McHenney M, McLeaster K, Mundy CW, Nicas TI, Norris FH, O'Gara M, Peery RB, Robertson GT, Rockey P, Sun PM, Winkler ME, Yang Y, Young-Bellido M, Zhao G, Zook CA, Baltz RH, Jaskunas SR, Rosteck PR, Skatrud PL, Glass JI: Genome of the bacterium Streptococcus pneumoniae strain R6. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 5709-5717. 10.1128/JB.183.19.5709-5717.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA: Current protocols in molecular biology. Current Protocols. Edited by: Chanda VB. 1999, New York, Published by Greene Pub. Associates and Wiley-Interscience : J. WileyGoogle Scholar
  27. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24: 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nix DA, Eisen MB: GATA: a graphic alignment tool for comparative sequence analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2005, 6: 9-10.1186/1471-2105-6-9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Carriço JA, Silva-Costa C, Melo-Cristino J, Pinto FR, de Lencastre H, Almeida JS, Ramirez M: Illustration of a common framework for relating multiple typing methods by application to macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 2524-2532. 10.1128/JCM.02536-05.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Altman DG: Practical statistics for medical research. 1999, Boca Raton, Fla., Chapman & Hall/CRC, xii, 611 p.-Google Scholar
  31. Fisher RA: Confidence limits for a cross-product ratio. Australian Journal of Statistics. 1962, 4: 41-10.1111/j.1467-842X.1962.tb00285.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y: Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approch to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Statistical Methodology. 1995, 57: 289-300.Google Scholar
  33. Agresti A: Categorical data analysis. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics Applied probability and statistics. 1990, New York, Wiley, xv, 558 p.-Google Scholar
  34. Comparing partitions website. [http://www.comparingpartitions.info]
  35. Aragon T: EpiTools: R package for Epidemiologic Data and Graphics. 2007, [http://www.epitools.net]0.4-8Google Scholar

Copyright

© Aguiar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us