- Research article
- Open Access
Detection of Francisella tularensis in ticks and identification of their genotypes using multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis
- Fang Zhang†1,
- Wei Liu†1,
- Xiao-Ming Wu1,
- Zhong-Tao Xin2,
- Qiu-Min Zhao1,
- Hong Yang1 and
- Wu-Chun Cao1Email author
© Zhang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
- Received: 23 October 2007
- Accepted: 17 September 2008
- Published: 17 September 2008
Tularemia was reported in China over 50 years ago, however, many epidemical characteristics remain unclear. In the present study, the prevalence of Francisella tularensis in ticks was investigated during an epidemiological surveillance in China and then we measured their genetic diversity by conducting multiple-locus variable- number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA).
1670 ticks from 2 endemic areas (Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region and Heilongjiang Province) and 2 non-endemic areas (Jilin and Fujian Provinces) were collected and tested for evidence of tularemia by nested PCR. The prevalence of Francisella tularensis in ticks averaged 1.98%. The positive rates were significantly different among tick species, with Dermacentor silvarum and Ixodes persulatus responsible for all positive numbers. All F. tularensis that were detected in ticks belonged to F. tularensis subsp. holarctica and MLVA disclosed genetic diversity. One subtype was identified in 17 of 33 positive tick samples in three different study areas. Another subtype belonging to F. tularensis subsp. holarctica genotype was described for the first time in the current study.
The study showed two tick species, D. silvarum and I. persulatus harboring the pathogen of tularemia in natural environment, indicating these two tick species might have a role in tularemia existence in China. MLVA results disclosed the genetic diversity F. tularensis and identified one genotype as the most prevalent among the investigated ticks in China.
- Tick Species
- Jilin Province
- Heilongjiang Province
- Francisella Tularensis
Tularemia, also known as rabbit fever or deer-fly fever, is caused by the gram-negative intracellular pathogen Francisella tularensis (F. tularensis), which is highly infectious and considered as a potential bioweapon. Currently there are four recognized subspecies of F. tularensis: subsp. tularensis, holarctica, mediasiatica and novicida. The former two subspecies are clinically important. F. tularensis is widely distributed in the Northern hemisphere and is capable of infecting hundreds of different vertebrates and invertebrates [1–3]. In addition, a variety of arthropods, including multiple genera of ticks as well as deer flies, fleas, mites, and mice, have been found to be naturally infected or experimentally competent as vectors. In many endemic areas, ticks play an important role in transmission of the disease from animals to humans , with the genera Amblyomma, Dermacentor, Haemaphysalis, Ixodes and Ornithodoros acting as main vectors .
In China, F. tularensis was isolated in Citellus dauricus from Tongliao region, Inner Mongolia municipality as early as in 1957 [5, 6]. The first human tularemia epidemic, including 14 reported cases, which was caused by contact with infected hares, was reported in Heilongjiang province in 1959 . The natural foci of the disease were subsequently identified in Tibet and Xinjiang municipalities [8–10]. The agent was detected and isolated from patients, Ixodex liberelis, Dermacentor marginatus and wolly hares (Lepus oiostolos) from Qinghai Province and Tibet, Xinjiang Autonomous Regions during 1962–1986 [8–11]. An outbreak of tularemia occurred in Shandong province in 1986. All the 31 reported patients were workers in a food-processing factory, where hares were slaughtered and processed . Serological investigations demonstrated that the seropositive reaction to F. tularensis was significantly associated with tick exposure [8, 13]. However, little is known about the prevalence of F. tularensis in ticks in China, lack of such information has inhibited our fully understanding of the disease ecology and also under-estimated the threat of the pathogen to human health where ticks are abundant. In the present study, we try to investigate the presence of F. tularensis in ticks, and then to identify their genotypes using multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA).
Prevalence of F. tularensis in ticks
Detection for F. tularensis in ticks by species and geographic origins in China
No. positive/no. detected (%)
Genotypes of F. tularensis detected from ticks in China
Genotypes for two marker
Although F. tularensis can be cultured in the laboratory, it requires enriched growth media and BSL3 facilities for isolation, these problems, together with the difficulty of recognizing the bacterium make it lack rapid and safe methods for laboratory identification . Nowadays, various PCR approaches amplifying different genomic segments have been applied to detecting F. tularensis [19–22]. The evaluations were performed during epidemics in Sweden in 1995 and 1998, respectively. It proved PCR detection of F. tularensis was more sensitive than culture . In present study, nested-PCR method which targeting fopA gene of F. tualrensis [17, 23] was used to detect F. tularensis in ticks from four provinces of China. We were able to detect F. tualrensis in D. silvarum and I. persulcatus from three northern provinces of China. The prevalence in ticks was 1.98%, which is comparable with the prevalence of 2.1%–2.8% in D. reticulates from European countries [4, 24]. Actually, as early as 2004, during an epidemical survey we have detected F. tularensis in rodents from these three provinces . The present findings, combined with our previous detection result in rodents, adds evidence to our belief that tularemia may be only confined to the northern part of China. During our study, we were able to detect F. tularensis in D. silvarum and I. persulatus, whereas not from Haemaphysalis verticalis and Boophilus microplus. Moreover, the F. tularensis strains in China were mainly isolated from these two tick genera [8–10]. The principal tick vectors seemed only include the genus Dermacentor and Ixodes in China, because we have found no evidence that other tick genera was involved in F. tularensis to date.
For the first time, our study identified the infection of F. tularensis in ticks from Jilin Province. Actually, natural infection of F. tularensis in rodents had been recorded from same study sites in 2006 . Geographically, Jilin Province is adjacent to Heilongjiang Province where first human tularemia cases were reported and natural focus was established as early as in 1958 . The study sites from two provinces were close to each other and they have the same ecological environment. So it was not surprising that we were able to detect F. tularensis in ticks from Jilin Province. However, it is still too early to state that tularemia natural focus exists in Jilin Province because until now we have not obtained the isolate and there is no any case report.
Tandem repeat regions are known to be highly variable and successfully used for typing bacterial species, even for discriminating individual isolates [15, 17, 26–28]. During our study, two loci (Ft-M3 and Ft-M10) were used to measure the genetic diversity of F. tularensis detected in the study. The sequence of the 16-bp repeating unit of Ft-M10 was invariant, this result was consistent with our previous study results . Perhaps there was only one variant from Ft-M10 locus among Chinese F. tularensis, although about 10 variants had been identified , among which 3 variants for F. tularensis subsp. holarctica were identified . 7 variants were identified for 33 positive samples from Ft-M3 locus, among which one unique type containing 7 repeat copies was firstly identified in F. tularensis subsp. holarctica, this type had been identified from F. tularensis subsp. tularensis infected tick samples in Goethert's study . According to the sequences, we are sure that the F. tularensis detected in present study can all be grouped as the F. tularensis subsp. holarctica (type B), not F. tularensis subsp. tularensis. The type containing 9 repeat copies from Ft-M3 locus seemed to be dominant in the detected ticks, actually in Goethert's study they had identified one genotype (also from Ft-M3 locus containing 10 repeat copies) only existing in ticks, which belonged to F. tularensis subsp.tularensis (type A). A variety of samples should be included to illuminate whether there are differences in various genotype among host ranges.
This study showed the role of two tick species in harboring the pathogen of tularemia in natural environment in China. In endemic foci where these genera ticks are abundant, public health officials and clinicians should be alert to the presence of tularemia, although it is not notifiable disease in China. In addition, MLVA results disclosed the genetic diversity of detected F. tularensis and identified one dominant genotype existing in ticks. Future work will involve more markers other than Ft-M3 and Ft-M10 detected in multiple-labs so to make comparisons with isolates of worldwide origin possible [29, 30].
Adult ticks were collected from Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Heilongjiang Province, Jilin Province and Fujian Province. Ticks from Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region were collected in April 2005. Others were collected during April to June in 2006. The first three collection sites are forested highlands in northeastern China, belonging to Great Xing'an Mountains and Small Xing'an Mountains with an elevation 500–825 m. There are many marsh existing in above three regions. The main vegetation types are coniferophyte, and in marsh region, Tansy, reeds, and Artemisia are dominant. The temperature ranges from -40°C to 30°C. The study site in Fujian Province is wooded foothills in southern China. The main vegetation is broad-leaved plant. At least 5 different sites were sampled for each province. Ticks were collected by dragging a cloth over the vegetation and were stored alive until brought into laboratory. In the laboratory, ticks were examined morphologically and sorted by species, developmental stage under microscope. After species identification, tick specimens were stored at -20°C for further DNA extraction.
Ticks were processed individually. DNA extraction was performed by a modification of a previously described method . Briefly, each tick was soaked in 70% ethanol for 10 minutes, and then rinsed three times in sterile water. Then the tick was placed into microtube and mechanically disrupted with sterile scissors in 50 μl of DNA extraction buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 2 mM EDTA, 0.1% SDS, 500 μg of proteinase K/ml). Each sample was incubated for 2 h at 56°C and then boiled at 100°C for 10 min to inactivate proteinase K. After centrifugation, the supernatant was transferred to a fresh sterile microtubule and purified by extracting twice with an equal volume of phenol-chloroform before use. Then TE (10 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 2 mM EDTA) was added to dissolve DNA for PCR use.
Samples were screened for evidence of F. tularensis by nested PCR targeting the fopA gene, as described previously [17, 23]. All positive specimens for the fopA gene were re-tested to obtain subspecies confirmation by amplifying the ppI-helicase region of F. tularensis gene structure using the primer pair of C6 (AGGCGGAGATCTAGGAACCTTT, GenBank accession no. AF247642) and C8 (AGCCCAAGCTGACTAAAATCTTT, GenBank accession no. AF247685). This PCR yielded a variable-length amplicon due to a 30-bp deletion in F. tularensis subsp.holarctica: for F. tularensis subsp.holarctica, the amplicon was 220 bp (GenBank accession no. EU526911), and for F. tularensis subsp.tularensis, the amplicon was 250 bp in length . All the PCR products were separated by 3% agarose gel electrophoresis, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV light. Negative controls and positive controls (Chinese first F. tularensis strain isolated from Citellus dauricus in 1957 from Inner Mongolia) were applied to ensure validation of the amplification. To minimize contamination, DNA extraction, the reagent setup, amplification, and agarose gel electrophoresis were performed in separate rooms. Amplicons from all PCR assays were sequenced to verify the validity of the PCR. For sequencing, amplicons were excised from the gels, purified through spin columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and sequenced on automated DNA sequencer (ABI PRISM 377, Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, USA). All sequencing primers were amplification primers which were read for both strands.
Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA)
Using MLVA, two markers, Ft-M3 and Ft-M10 (previous designations SSTR9 and SSTR16, respectively) were used to identify the genetic diversity among positive ticks as previously described [14, 15]. All amplicons obtained from two markers were sequenced on an automated DNA sequencer (ABI PRISM 377 Parkin-Elmer, Inc). The number of repeated units for each sample was counted. The genotype was defined simply as the number of repeats for Ft-M3 followed by that for Ft-M10.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers
Nucleic acid sequences representative of each genotype and sequence from subspecies confirmation were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers EU526911, EU544140 to EU544147.
This work was supported by grants from Natural Science Foundation of China (30600506) and the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (No. 30725032). We thank Mrs. Peggy Wagner from Emory University for critical review.
- Ellis J, Oyston PCF, Green M, Titball RW: Tularemia. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002, 15: 631-646. 10.1128/CMR.15.4.631-646.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen JM, Schriefer ME: Tularemia: emergence/re-emergence. Vet Res. 2005, 36: 455-467. 10.1051/vetres:2005006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tärnvik A, Berglund L: Tularemia. Eur Respir J. 2003, 21: 361-373. 10.1183/09031936.03.00088903.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gordon JR, Mclaughlin BG, Nitituthai S: Tularemia transmitted by ticks (Dermacentor andersoni) in Saskatchewan. Can J Copm Med. 1983, 47: 408-411.Google Scholar
- Yang L: The report on isolation of Francisella tularensis from Citellus dauricus. Chin J Epidemiol. 1958, 2: 4-10.Google Scholar
- Sun YD, Zhang ZX, Zhao B: The identification of Francisella tularensis-like organism isolated from Inner Mongolia. Chin J Epidemiol. 1958, 2: 15-27.Google Scholar
- Kang CG: An epidemiological investigation on the first epidemic of human tularemia in China. Chin J Epidemiol. 1980, 1: 248-251.Google Scholar
- Guo CH, Zen QG, Wang SC, Shi TF, Wu FL, Jia MH: Preliminary study of tularemia in Tibet Autonomous Region. Chin J Epidemiol. 1981, 2: 176-181.Google Scholar
- Zhou XR, Liu SK, Wang TX, Zhang GL, Ma DX: Preliminary investigation on tularemia in Ali area. Endemic Diseases Bulletin. 1993, 8: 73-77.Google Scholar
- Li L, Kou ZM: Preliminary study of tularemia in Ta-cheng District of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Chin J Epidemiolog. 1985, 6: 20-22.Google Scholar
- Wang WH, Zhu HJ, Shi XQ, Zhou AQ: The report of isolating Francisella tularensis from Lepus oiostorum in Qinghai Province. Chin J Epidemiol. 1980, 4: 245-247.Google Scholar
- Pang ZC: Investigation of the first outbreak of tularemia in Shandong Peninsula. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 1987, 5: 261-263.Google Scholar
- Liu ZJ, Wang DH, Zhang YZ, Su DS, Shi SZ, Luo YQ, Sun ZX: Seroepidemiological study on tularemia from Qilian Mountain. China public health. 1995, 7: 320Google Scholar
- Liu W, He J, Duan Q, Zhang PH, Zhao QM, Wu XM, Yang H, Cao WC: Genotyping of Francisella tularensis strains isolated from China by short-sequence tandem repeat region analysis. Chin J Microbiol Immunol. 2003, 23: 826-828.Google Scholar
- Johansson A, Granssön I, Larsson P, Sjstedt A: Extensive allelic variation among Francisella tularensis strains in a short-sequence tandem repeat region. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 3140-3146. 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3140-3146.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansson A, Farlow J, Larsson P, Dukerich M, Chambers E, BystorÖm M: Worldwide genetic relationship among Francisella tularensis isolates determined by multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 5808-5818. 10.1128/JB.186.17.5808-5818.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goethert HK, Shani I, Telford SR: Genotypic Diversity of Francisella tularensis infecting Dermacentor variabilis Ticks on Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 4968-4973. 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4968-4973.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansson A, Forsman M, SjÖstedt A: The development of tools for diagnosis of tularemia and typing of Francisella tularensis. APMIS. 2004, 112: 898-907. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2004.apm11211-1212.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansson A, Berglund L, Eriksson U, GÖransson I, Wollin R, Forsman M: Comparative analysis of PCR versus culture for diagnosis of ulceroglandular tularemia. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 22-26.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- SjÖstedt A, Eriksson U, Berglund L, Tärnvik A: Detection of Francisella tularensis in ulcers of patients with tularemia by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 1045-1048.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Higgins JA, Hubalek Z, Halouzka J, Elkins KL, SjÖstedt A, Shipley M: Detection of Francisella tularensis in infected mammals and vectors using a probe-based polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 62 (2): 310-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Emanuel PA, Bell R, Dang JL, McClanahan R, David JC, Bergess RJ: Detection of Francisella tularensis within infected mouse tissues by using a hand-held PCR thermocycler. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 689-693. 10.1128/JCM.41.2.689-693.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fulop M, Leslie D, Titball R: A rapid, highly sensitive method for the detection of Francisella tularensis in clinical samples using the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1996, 54: 364-366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tärnvik A, Priebe HS, Grunow R: Tularemia in Europe: An Epidemiological Overview. Scand J Infect Dis. 2004, 36: 350-355. 10.1080/00365540410020442.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang F, Liu W, Chu MC, He J, Duan Q, Wu XM, Zhang PH, Zhao QM, Yang H, Xin ZT, Cao WC: Francisella tularensis in rodents, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12 (6): 994-6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pourcel C, Andr-Mazzeaud F, Neubauer H, Ramisse F, Vergnaud G: Tandem repeats analysis for the high phylogenetic analysis of Yersinia pestis. BMC Microbiology. 2004, 4: 22-30. 10.1186/1471-2180-4-22.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ramisse V, Houssu P, Hernandez E, Denoeud F, Hilaire V, Lisanti O: Variable number of tandem repeats in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica for typing purposes. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 5722-5730. 10.1128/JCM.42.12.5722-5730.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Top J, Schhouls LM, Bonten MJM, Willems RJL: Multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis, a novel typing scheme to study the genetic relatedness and epidemiology of Enterococcus faecium isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 4503-4511. 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4503-4511.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farlow J, Wagner DM, Dukerich M, Stanley M, Chu M, Kubota K: Francisella tularensis in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 1835-1841.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farlow J, Smith KL, Wong J, Abrams M, Lytle M, Keim P: Francisella tularensis Strain Typing Using Multiple-Locus Variable-Number Tandem Repeat Analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 3186-3192. 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3186-3192.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cao WC, Zhao QM, Zhang PH, Dumler JS, Zhang XT, Fang LQ: Granulocytic ehrlichiae in Ixodes persulcatus ticks from an area in China where Lyme disease is endemic. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 4208-4210.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.