Skip to main content
Download PDF

Subtle genetic changes enhance virulence of methicillin resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus

BMC Microbiology volume 7, Article number: 99 (2007) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Community acquired (CA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) increasingly causes disease worldwide. USA300 has emerged as the predominant clone causing superficial and invasive infections in children and adults in the USA. Epidemiological studies suggest that USA300 is more virulent than other CA-MRSA. The genetic determinants that render virulence and dominance to USA300 remain unclear.

Results

We sequenced the genomes of two pediatric USA300 isolates: one CA-MRSA and one CA-methicillin susceptible (MSSA), isolated at Texas Children's Hospital in Houston. DNA sequencing was performed by Sanger dideoxy whole genome shotgun (WGS) and 454 Life Sciences pyrosequencing strategies. The sequence of the USA300 MRSA strain was rigorously annotated. In USA300-MRSA 2658 chromosomal open reading frames were predicted and 3.1 and 27 kilobase (kb) plasmids were identified. USA300-MSSA contained a 20 kb plasmid with some homology to the 27 kb plasmid found in USA300-MRSA. Two regions found in US300-MRSA were absent in USA300-MSSA. One of these carried the arginine deiminase operon that appears to have been acquired from S. epidermidis. The USA300 sequence was aligned with other sequenced S. aureus genomes and regions unique to USA300 MRSA were identified.

Conclusion

USA300-MRSA is highly similar to other MRSA strains based on whole genome alignments and gene content, indicating that the differences in pathogenesis are due to subtle changes rather than to large-scale acquisition of virulence factor genes. The USA300 Houston isolate differs from another sequenced USA300 strain isolate, derived from a patient in San Francisco, in plasmid content and a number of sequence polymorphisms. Such differences will provide new insights into the evolution of pathogens.

Background

Community acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections are increasing worldwide [1, 2]. Although the emergence is concurrent, genetically distinct clones have been reported from different continents [3–6]. In the United States, two clones, USA300 and USA400 have been associated with the majority of CA-MRSA infections [7]. However, USA300 is currently being reported as the predominant cause of both adult and pediatric CA-MRSA infections in many states [8–12]. At Texas Children's Hospital (TCH) in Houston, Texas, we have observed a continuous increase of CA-S. aureus infections, predominantly CA-MRSA, in a prospective surveillance study initiated in 2001 [13]. Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) represented 94%; 58% of SSTI patients were hospitalized. We have also reported an increased number and severity of invasive cases, e.g. complicated pneumonia, osteomyelitis, pyomyositis, myositis and severe sepsis syndrome associated with the predominance of clone USA300 [9, 14–18]. Similar observations have been described at other institutions across the United States [19]. Recent reports suggest that USA300 is more virulent than other MRSA strains [15, 20, 21]. USA300 is genetically related to the nosocomial MRSA strain COL, which emerged in the 1960s in Europe following the introduction of methicillin. Both of these strains are likely descendents of a methicillin-susceptible ancestral strain [22, 23].

Approximately 75% of the CA-S. aureus strains at TCH are MRSA; 95% of these are USA300. In contrast to the homogeneity of CA-MRSA, CA methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) from the same population are more heterogeneous; USA300 represented approximately 25% of these strains between 2000–2002 [9]. We continue to note a greater absolute increase in the number of CA-MRSA isolates, being virtually all USA300-MR, compared with CA-MSSA among children evaluated at TCH (Figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1
figure1

Histogram of the prevalence of community-acquired MR and MS strains of S. aureus at TCH over a four-year study. All cases are shown in red, MR cases in green and MS cases in purple.

Full size image
Figure 2
figure2

PFGE of Sma I-digested USA300-HOU-MR and USA300-HOU-MS. Replicates of MR (left) and MS (right) profiles are shown. Molecular weight markers are shown in kilobases.

Full size image

At the time of this writing, the complete genomes of eleven MRSA and MSSA clinical strains, of both community and hospital origin, plus a bovine S. aureus strain have been deposited in the GenBank database. Recently, the genome sequence of a multi-resistant USA300-MR isolate (FPR3757) from an abscess of an HIV-positive intravenous drug user was reported [24]. We present the sequence of a USA300-MR isolate from an otherwise healthy pediatric patient (USA300-HOU) and compare it to the genomes of FPR3757 and a USA300-MS isolate from TCH. We postulate that comparison of the genomes of USA300-MR and USA300-MS will provide clues to the enhanced ability of USA300-HOU-MR to spread and cause infections among children compared to other S. aureus clones circulating in Houston.

Results

Features of the USA300-HOU-MR genome

The USA300-HOU-MR genome is 2,872,915 bp in length and was annotated to encode 2658 proteins, 59 tRNAs (plus one pseudogene), 5 ribosomal RNA operons and 21 non-coding RNAs (Table 1). A circular representation of the sequenced genome is shown in Figure 3. To identify DNA regions unique to USA300-HOU-MR, two-way BLASTN was performed against each of the other complete staphylococcal genomes (Figure 4). USA300-HOU-MR carries the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type IVa methicillin resistance cassette. In addition to SCCmec IVa, the strain also contains a ca. 31 kb region of DNA from 57860 to 88845 that is unique only to USA300-HOU-MR, USA300-FPR3757 and to S. epidermidis ATCC12228 (Additional file 1) [25]. This region maps immediately downstream of SCCmec and the entire element (34173 to 88845) is flanked by an IS431mec transposase gene and a possible transposase gene. The region downstream of SCCmec carries genes encoding an arginine deiminase operon, a Crp family transcriptional regulator, an APC family arginine/ornithine antiporter, and an arginine repressor. In USA300-FPR3757, this region is called ACME, for arginine catabolic mobile element [24]. Downstream of the arginine element we also annotated genes encoding a universal stress protein, a lysophospholipase, a possible S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferase, an ABC superfamily ATP binding cassette transporter, a P-ATPase copper transporter, a possible lipoprotein and an integrase. The ABC transporter proteins had top BLAST hits to nickel, dipeptide or oligopeptide transporters in other species and it was annotated as an oligopeptide transporter by Diep, et al. [24]. ClustalW analyses of the individual components of these transporters indicated a clustering of nickel-specific sequences with those from USA300-HOU-MR (data not shown). Thus, we believe that this transporter is likely involved in nickel acquisition. InterProScan, PFP and PSORTB, SecretomeP2.0 were used to augment the annotation data obtained by BLASTP and CDD. Based on this analysis, the SCCmec-ACME region encodes four non-classically secreted proteins and three other extracellular proteins. The region also encodes a possible endonuclease, possible tRNA ligases, RNA polymerases and a primase. We also identified a number of ORFs that were not annotated in USA300-FPR3757; these were hypothetical or conserved hypothetical proteins.

Table 1 Riboswitches and small non-coding RNAs in USA300-HOU-MR
Full size table
Figure 3
figure3

Chromosomal map of USA300-HOU-MR with landmarks indicating the SCCmec-ACME region (outer circle, green), pathogenicity islands (outer circle, light blue), prophage (outer circle, lavender), the 13 kb insertion sequence (outer circle, orange), and two regions of sequence not found in USA300-HOU-MS (outer circle, yellow). ORFs on both strands are represented by the second circle and are colored according to functional categories as follows and as shown in the key: cell processes, tan; cell structure, violet; DNA replication and recombination, red; general metabolism, blue; regulation, green; transcription, yellow; translation, orange; transport, cyan; virulence, fuchsia; unknown, black. The third circle shows RNAs: rRNAs, blue; tRNAs, red; ncRNAs, green. The inner circle shows the location of SNPs between USA300-HOU-MR and FPR3757.

Full size image
Figure 4
figure4

Linear representation of BLASTN comparison of S. aureus strains to USA300-HOU-MR. Strains are listed on the y-axis and the x-axis shows the USA300-HOU-MR coordinates. Bars represent regions of at least 50 bp in length present in USA300-HOU-MR but absent in the other strains.

Full size image

Pathogenicity islands and prophages

More than fifteen different pathogenicity islands have been identified in the sequenced S. aureus genomes [25, 26]. SaPIs are mobile genetic elements that carry about half of the known S. aureus toxin or virulence factor genes, and while strains contain different combinations of the islands, no strain appears to carry more than one copy of each type [27]. USA300-HOU-MR contains six, SaPI5, SaPIm4, SaPI6Δ, v Saα, v Saβ, and v Saγ. These encode enterotoxins, extotoxins and serine proteases as well as leukotoxin, hemolysin, exfoliatin, and epidermin (Figure 3 and Table 2). MW2, another community-acquired MRSA isolate contains the same complement of islands, while, COL, Mu50 and RF122 contain six islands each, though in different combinations.

Table 2 Pathogenicity islands in completed genomes of S. aureus
Full size table

USA300-HOU-MR carries two complete prophage sequences, φSLT-USA300 and φβC-USA300. Prophage remnants also occur within pathogenicity island SaPI5. The φSLT-USA300 sequence is 98% identical to the 46139 bp φSLT sequence [28], excepting gaps greater than 500 bp. These gaps represent regions in USA300 encoding a helicase and virulence-associated protein E, two DNA polymerases, and two prophage regulatory proteins. The prophage carries the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes lukS-PV and lukF-PV. By PHYLIP analysis, the φSLT-USA300 sequence is most similar to the prophages in MW2 and clinical strain A980470 (phiSLT) [28] (Figure 5a). As observed for φSLT-A980470 and φ-PVL, the φSLT-USA300 attachment site lies within a conserved hypothetical protein gene [28, 29]. The second prophage, φβC-USA300, is very similar to β-hemolysin-converting prophages identified in JH1, JH9, MRSA252, MSSA476, Mu50, MW2, N315, Newman, and NCTC8325 (Figure 5b). It is most similar to those found in JH1, JH9 and N315. In USA300, this prophage encodes staphylokinase, chemotaxis inhibitory protein and staphylococcal complement inhibitor; the order of these genes places it in immune evasion cluster (IEC) type B [30]. Unlike COL, USA300-HOU-MR lacks the L54α-like bacteriophage. As a result, the glycerol ester hydrolase, or geh lipase gene, which is disrupted in strains carrying the L54α-like prophage, is intact and presumed to be expressed.

Figure 5
figure5

Boot-strapped phylogenetic trees of the prophages found in USA300-HOU-MR: a) phiSLT phage and b) phiβC family phage. The numbers on the branches indicate the number of times the sets co-partitioned after 100 iterations.

Full size image

Plasmids

Two plasmids were detected in USA300-HOU-MR (Figure 6a and 6b). The 3.1 kb plasmid, pUSA01-HOU, is identical to plasmid pUSA01 in USA300-FPR3757. It encodes a replication protein plus several conserved hypothetical proteins. The second larger plasmid, pUSA300-HOU-MR, appears to be a mosaic of parts of three plasmids: pN315 from S. aureus N315; pSR1 from S. aureus strain 01A103; and pSERP from S. epidermidis RP62A. The plasmid carries two recombinase genes and three IS431 transposase genes that may have played a role in fusion of the three elements. The replication region appears to be derived from pNF315B. pUSA300-HOU-MRSA encodes resistance to beta-lactam, macrolide, aminoglycoside, streptothricin (nourseothricin) and bacitracin antibiotics, consistent with the resistance pattern observed for USA300-HOU-MR (Table 3), with the exception of nourseothricin. The streptothricin acetyltransferase and 3',5'-aminoglycoside transferase genes are adjacent and map between two IS431 transposase genes; long inverted repeats (ca. 700 bp) flank these genes. The repeats are most similar to the inverted repeats found in IS257 from S. epidermidis strain SK76 (Genbank SEU40386) though similar repeats are found on a number of plasmids from both S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Thus, it appears that this region constitutes a compound transposon that could also be part of a larger element carrying the bacitracin transporter genes. A ca. 400 nt repeat (which is a subset of the ca 700 bp repeat) also occurs within the IS431 transpose genes at ca. 12.5 and 21 kb on the map. pUSA300-HOU-MR also encodes a cadmium transporter CadD and regulator CadX, and at least three additional predicted transcriptional regulators including BlaI and BlaR.

Figure 6
figure6

Linear representations of circular plasmids observed in USA300-HOU-MR (a, b) and USA300-MS (c). Replication and regulatory genes are colored red, recombination/transposition genes are green, antibiotic/heavy metal/bacteriocin resistance genes are blue, other genes are white and hypothetical, conserved hypothetical (CHP) and staphylococcal conserved hypotheticals (SCHP) are colored grey. Horizontal bars indicate the regions of pUSA300-HOU-MR and pUSA300-HOU-MS having homology with other sequenced staphylococcal plasmids.

Full size image
Table 3 Antimicrobial susceptibilities of USA300-HOU-MR and USA300-HOU-MS
Full size table

Comparison of USA300-HOU-MR and USA300-FPR3757

We identified 14 insertions/deletions (indels) of greater than four bp between USA300- FPR3757 and USA300-HOU-MR (Table 4). The most significant difference between the two strains is the location of a 13.4 kb insertion. In USA300-FPR3757, this region is inserted at nt 1,630,721 between a biotin carboxylase carrier protein gene, accB, and the elongation factor P gene efp. In USA300-HOU-MR, this same 13 kb segment of DNA is inserted at nt 680,375 within the snoA gene at the beginning of the staphylococcal nuo-like operon, which encodes an NADH dehydrogenase [31]. The 13 kb segment is also found in COL, at the same location as in USA300-FPR3757, and in MRSA252 between two bacteriophage protein genes. There is no homology flanking the insertions sites for this element and there are no obvious recombination sequences or repeats within the segment. The first gene in the segment encodes a frameshift of an ISSA1 transposase. The frameshift occurs in a poly adenine tract so sequence variation through slipped-strand mispairing is possible. Six of the proteins encoded by the 13 kb segment may be non-classically secreted proteins. Also encoded are a possible lipoprotein, a peptidoglycan hydrolase, a cell division protein, a GTP-binding protein, a replication protein and a possible actin-binding protein.

Table 4 Insertions and deletions between USA300-HOU-MR and FPR3757
Full size table

An insertion of 159 bp in USA300-HOU-MR but not in USA300-FPR3757 occurs within a staphylococcal conserved hypothetical protein between 1857878 and 1858036. This insertion is a duplication of flanking sequence and maintains the reading frame of the protein. Another difference identified is a 47 bp region in USA300-FPR3757, within the repeated region of the IgG binding protein gene; again, these are absent from USA300-HOU. Additional short deletions in USA300-HOU-MR also occur within intergenic regions. Also of note is a frameshift in the gene encoding an AraC family transcriptional regulator in USA300 (742860–745009). This frameshift is not observed in any of the other sequenced S. aureus strains. In addition, we identified a frameshift in the cell wall anchor protein gene (2623054–2626400) not reported in the annotation of FP3757.

Comparison of the two USA300 sequences revealed 92 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and two four bp. deletions (Additional file 2). We also discovered 53 sequencing errors in the FPR357 sequence. Fifty-five of the SNPs map within ORFs, while 18 map within intergenic regions (this is consistent with the fact that 80% of the genome is coding sequence) and 7 map within rRNA sequences. Twenty-one of the changes within reading frames are synonymous, 34 are non-synonymous and 7 caused frameshifts. Two of the SNPs may explain differences in antibiotic susceptibility. One, a T (FPR357) to C (HOU) change in the gyrA gene causes a leucine to serine change at amino acid 84. The serine-containing GyrA protein confers resistance to ciprofloxacin (FPR357), while leucine confers the wild-type, susceptible phenotype (HOU, Table 2) [32]. A second SNP presumed to be involved in fluoroquinolone resistance maps within the topoisomerase IV parC gene. Here, the USA300-HOU-MR amino acid 80 is the wild-type serine, while USA300-FPR3757 has a tyrosine that confers resistance [33]. Three non-synonymous SNPs occur within the IgG binding protein A. SNPs in intergenic regions could affect gene regulation: a four base deletion at 2,627,226 would place a SarA binding motif closer to the sarU promoter and could affect its transcription (Figure 7).

Figure 7
figure7

DNA sequence of the sarU promoters in USA300-HOU-MR and FPR3757 showing -10 and -35 sequences (red) and SarA consensus binding sites (boxed).

Full size image

We compared the USA300 SNPs to all other sequenced S. aureus strains (Additional file 2). For 39 of the SNPs, the other strains had the USA300-HOU-MR allele, while in 34 the allele was identical to FPR3757. For the remaining SNPs, the other strains showed both alleles, with some being triallelic.

Comparison of USA300-HOU-MR and of USA300-HOU-MS

We generated a draft sequence of the methicillin susceptible strain, USA300-HOU-MS, using the 454 Life Sciences pyrosequencing technology [34]. This strain is susceptible to all the antibiotics tested except penicillin (Table 1). The sequences were assembled into 326 contigs with a total contig length of 2.8 Mb. We observed 32 SNPs between the HOU-MRSA and MSSA strains (Additional file 1). We also identified two regions of DNA that are found in USA300-HOU-MR but not in USA300-HOU-MS. In contrast, we observed only one region in the MS strain not present in the USA300-HOU-MR strain. This 733 bp contig had a short DNA match (44 bp, 100% identity) to several staphylococcal sequences and a partial protein match (50% length, 38% identity) to a transport accessory protein. The sequences missing from USA300-HOU-MS included the SCCmec and ACME regions (34173–88845, Additional file 2). A second region not found in USA300-HOU-MS (680132 to 694219) includes a large number of staphylococcal conserved hypothetical proteins (Additional file 2). Four of the proteins encoded by this region may be secreted (two non-classical). Also encoded are a possible lipoprotein, a peptidoglycan hydrolase, a cell division protein, ATP- and GTP-binding proteins, a replication protein, a possible secreted actin-binding protein, a possible ornithine carbamoyltransferase and a possible histidinol dehydrogenase.

We surveyed other sequenced staphylococcal genomes using TBLASTX for the presence of ORFs that were homologous to proteins encoded by the regions of USA300-HOU-MR that were missing in the MSSA strain. These are shown in Additional file 2. With the exception of a few matches in the MW2 genome, the region from 51299 to 62735 seems to encode proteins unique to USA300-MR. This region also encodes four hypothetical and six conserved hypothetical proteins; several of these, although present, were not annotated in USA300-FPR3757. As previously discussed, this region may encode several secreted proteins. Though the arginine deiminase DNA region is unique to USA300 and to S. epidermidis ATCC 12228, genes encoding homologues of the proteins are found elsewhere in the USA300-HOU-MS genome and in most of the complete staphylococcal genomes. Proteins weakly similar (e value > e-10) to the nickel transporter were found in all staphylococcal genomes but this is likely due to generalized matches to other ABC transporter subunits. In contrast, the nickel transporter proteins are most homologous to proteins encoded by Staphylococcus haemolyticus. The proteins encoded by the region between 680132 and 694219 are also encoded by the genomes of two nosocomial MRSA strains, COL and MRSA252. These were not found in the CA isolate MW2.

USA300-HOU-MS does not carry plasmid pUSA300-HOU-MR but it does carry a 21 kb plasmid (pUSA300-HOU-MS) that encodes resistance to beta-lactams and to cadmium (Figure 6c). It also carries genes that are predicted to encode a bacteriocin and its associated immunity protein. The region from 9382 to 13575 on pUSA300-HOU-MS is nearly identical (95%) to nts 7644 to 11837 of plasmid pN315B. This corresponds to the region encoding the beta-lactamase gene and its regulators, BlaR and BlaI, and a Tn552 invertase and recombinase. In addition, this same region on pUSA300-HOU-MS is 96% identical to nts. 7615–13573 on pUS300-HOU-MR. Thus, pUSA300-HOU-MS also appears to be mosaic. We also identified sequences homologous to pUSA01 on two contigs that were 1212 and 1278 bp in length, respectively. Since pUSA01 has now been sequenced twice, we did not attempt to complete the pUSA01 sequence in the MS strain.

Comparison with other completely sequenced staphylococcal genomes

We used Mauve [35] to align the sequences of the seventeen completed sequenced staphylococcal genomes (Figure 8) The alignment revealed that USA300 clusters with COL, NCTC8325, and Newman strains and that there are at least four clades of MRSA circulating. This clustering suggests that not all methicillin resistant S. aureus strains are intimately related further suggesting that different clones have given rise to groups of methicillin strains.

Figure 8
figure8

Dendrogram of seventeen fully sequenced genomes generated by Mauve [35] and drawn using MEGA [58]. RP62A and ATCC12228 are S. epidermidis strains, JCSC1435 is an S. haemolyticus strain, and ATCC15305 is an S. saprophyticus strain. All others are S. aureus strains. The bar represents coalescent units.

Full size image

Discussion

Because of the rapid and continuing increase of the prevalence of CA USA300 strains at TCH, we initiated the sequencing of two typical isolates from pediatric patients. During this time, Diep et al. [24] reported the sequence of USA300-FPR3757. USA300-HOU-MR revealed significant differences from USA300-FPR3757. Though USA300-FPR3757 was chosen as a highly resistant isolate, USA300-HOU-MR, a purely community-acquired strain, harbours a large plasmid encoding multiple antibiotic and cadmium resistance. The mosaic composition of plasmid pUSA300-HOU-MR representing three different staphylococcal plasmids points toward significant genetic exchange between staphylococcal isolates and species. Among the numerous antibacterial resistance genes found on the plasmid, the conferred resistance to bacitracin, a common constituent of topical over-the-counter ointments used to treat or prevent cutaneous infections, is most intriguing. In contrast to other MR strains, the cadmium resistance genes were found on a plasmid and not on the chromosome. Genome-wide alignments revealed that not all MRSA are tightly clustered.

Several indels between USA300-HOU-MR and USA300-FPR3757 were identified. The majority of the indels were within repeat regions or rRNAs, though a 13 kb segment was located in different regions of the two genomes. In USA300-FPR3757, the region is inserted between two genes. In USA300-HOU-MR, the segment interrupts an operon (snoABCDEFG) that has been implicated in susceptibility to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein 1 (tPMP-1). Bayer et al. [31] have shown that interruption of this operon reduces the susceptibility of S. aureus to tPMP-1 in vitro. Resistance to tPMP-1 may allow US300-HOU-MR to cause more serious disease by evasion of platelet-mediated killing in the blood stream. USA300-FPR3757 has an additional repeat within the gene encoding the IgG binding protein A, so it is possible that IgG binding protein is subject to structural variation. We also identified nine SNPs within this gene. This may suggest that the IgG binding protein undergoes significant variation, possibly in response to the host.

Two prophage were identified, one carrying the PVL genes and the other an hemolysin converting phage carrying the staphylokinase, chemotaxis inhibitory protein and staphylococcal complement inhibitor genes. USA300 lacks a copy of prophage L54a. The GehD lipase, whose gene contains the prophage attachment site, is likely to play a role in colonization events. [36].

SNP analysis revealed 47 non-synonymous, non-conserved differences between the strains. Some of these may affect protein function. Two of these, one in gyrA and one in parC, are consistent with antibiotic susceptibilities reported in Table 3. The SNP analysis also revealed a number of sequencing errors in the FPR3757 sequence.

To further our understanding of the evolution of the USA300-HOU-MR strain, we created a draft sequence of an MS isolate from TCH. This revealed two regions of the MR strain not found in the MS strain. It is likely that the progenitor MS strain acquired these regions (along with the SCCmec IVa and the arginine deiminase region) by recombination to become USA300-HOU-MR. We propose that USA300-HOU-MS first acquired the arginine deiminase region plus the cassette chromosome recombinase genes (ccrA B) from a strain similar to S. epidermidis ATCC12228. This is based on the observation that the ccrAB genes in USA300-HOU-MR are 95–100% identical to those found near the arginine deiminase region in S. epidermidis ATCC12228. The SCCmec was likely acquired in a separate event from another MRSA, or from a MR-S. epidermidis strain, via ccrAB recombination within the repeats flanking the arginine deiminase region [24]. US300-HOU-MS lacks a probable nickel ABC transporter that is linked to ACME in USA300-MR. It is possible that increased intracellular stores of nickel in USA300-HOU-MR could contribute to virulence by enhancing the activity of the nickel-dependent urease. [37]. The MS strain also lacks a copy of the P-ATPase copper transporter gene; such transporters have been shown to be involved in virulence in Listeria monocytogenes [38]. Another potential virulence factor revealed by comparison of the MR and MS strains is a possible secreted actin binding protein.

We used a relatively new predictive tool, SecretomeP2.0, to identify non-classically secreted proteins [39] since it is not possible to predict the function of most of these proteins by BLAST analysis. We found 406 high scoring genes predicted to encode non-classically secreted proteins in USA300-HOU-MR (Additional file 3). If some of these are indeed secreted then they may be candidate virulence factors for future study.

Conclusion

Comparative analyses have revealed that USA300-MRSA is highly similar to some MRSA strains suggesting that the differences in pathogenesis are due to subtle changes rather than to large-scale acquisition of virulence factor genes. Significantly, however, is the difference in plasmid content and antibiotic susceptibility profiles between the two USA300 isolates. The presence of a large multidrug resistance plasmid in a community-acquired isolate is unexpected. The combination of Sanger sequencing and 454 data allowed us to economically derive the complete sequence of USA300-HOU-MR and MS. Future sequencing of additional USA300 isolates will further characterize the genotypic variation in this clone. With exception of the antibiotic susceptibility profiles, the phenotypic results of the genotypic variation have yet to be discovered.

Methods

USA300 isolates

Clinical isolate TCH1516 (USA300-HOU-MR) was obtained from an adolescent patient with severe sepsis syndrome [15]. The strain was representative of the predominant Sma I pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern (Figure 2) observed in our clonal studies on CA-MRSA at TCH [9] and is indistinguishable from the CDC type strain USA300.0114 obtained from the Network on Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus [40]. The strain is sequence type 8 (ST8). Clinical isolate TCH959 (USA300-HOU-MS) was obtained from a 12 year old white female with a buttock abscess. The PFGE profile of the MSSA strain differed from USA300.0114 by two fragments. USA300-HOU-MS lacked a fragment of ca. 230 kb, which is present in the USA300-HOU-MR and the MS pattern included a 180 kb fragment absent in MR. Additionally, the ca. 300 kb fragment was slightly larger in the MS strain. FPR3757 was kindly provided by Francois Perdreau-Remington (University of California, San Francisco).

Antimicrobial susceptibilities

Antimicrobial susceptibilities were obtained by microbroth dilution assays using Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [41] (Table 3). Unlike the other sequenced USA300 isolate [24], USA300-HOU is susceptible to clindamycin, tetracycline, ciprofloxacin and mupirocin.

DNA sequencing and genome assembly

Genomic DNA was purified from CsCl gradients [42] and DNA sequencing was performed by Sanger dideoxy whole genome shotgun (WGS) and by the 454 Life Sciences pyrosequencing strategies [34]. Genomic and plasmid DNA from USA300-HOU-MR was sheared to a size of 2 kb by nebulization, and cloned into a derivative of pUC18 [43]. The clones were used for WGS DNA sequencing to 8× coverage by using dye terminator chemistry, data were collected on ABI 3730 sequencers, and reads were assembled using the ATLAS assembler [44]. This sequence was supplemented with contigs assembled from shorter reads generated on a 454 Life Sciences GS20 sequencer to 15× coverage. This combined assembly was refined by sequencing PCR products to fill in gaps and to resolve ambiguous regions. DNA from USA300-HOU-MS was sequenced by the 454 method to 17× coverage and the sequences assembled using the 454 Newbler assembler. The complete sequences have been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the following the accession numbers: CP000730 (USA300-HOU-MR); CP000731 (pUSA300-HOU-MR); CP000732 (pUSA300-HOU-MS). The USA300-HOU-MS has been deposited under the project accession AASB00000000. The version described in this manuscript is the first version, AASB01000000.

Glimmer [45] and GeneMark [46] were used independently to predict open reading frames (ORFs). Predicted proteins were compared to the nr database using BLASTP. Visualization of gene predictions was performed using the Genboree system [47] and the CONAN database [48]. Two individuals independently annotated each ORF and annotations were reconciled and converted to single entries within the database. Proteins lacking a homolog in the nr database were called hypothetical proteins, those with a homolog of no known function were called conserved hypothetical proteins and of these, if homologs were only in other staphylococci they were called staphylococcal conserved hypothetical proteins.

Sequence analysis

DNA comparisons were performed with BLASTN and BLASTZ. Protein sequences were analyzed by BLASTP and BLASTX and by the use of the predictive tools InterProScan [49], PFP [50], PSORTb [51], Helix-Turn-Helix Predictor [52], MEROPs [53], and the Tcdb Transport Classification database [54]. Non-classically secreted proteins (those lacking signal peptides) were predicted using SecretomeP2.0 [39]. Riboswitches and non-coding small RNAs were identified using BLASTN, the Riboswitch finder [55] and Riboswitch Explorer [56]. ClustalW [57] and Mauve [35] were used for multiple sequence alignments and PHLYIP bootstrapping and tree generation (evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between USA300-MRSA-HOU and FPR3757 were verified by resequencing.

References

  1. 1.

    Deresinski S: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an evolutionary, epidemiologic, and therapeutic odyssey. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 40 (4): 562-573. 10.1086/427701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Appelbaum PC: MRSA – the tip of the iceberg. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006, 12 (Suppl 2): 3-10. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01402.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Coombs GW, Nimmo GR, Bell JM, Huygens F, O'Brien FG, Malkowski MJ, Pearson JC, Stephens AJ, Giffard PM: Genetic diversity amongcommunity methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains causing outpatient infections in Australia. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42 (10): 4735-4743. 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4735-4743.2004.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chen CJ, Huang YC: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2005, 38 (6): 376-382.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hanssen AM, Fossum A, Mikalsen J, Halvorsen DS, Bukholm G, Sollid JU: Dissemination of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in northern Norway: sequence types 8 and 80 predominate. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43 (5): 2118-2124. 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2118-2124.2005.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ma XX, Galiana A, Pedreira W, Mowszowicz M, Christophersen I, Machiavello S, Lope L, Benaderet S, Buela F, Vincentino W, Albini M, Bertaux O, Constenla I, Bagnulo H, Llosa L, Ito T, Hiramatsu K: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Uruguay. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11 (6): 973-976.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McDougal LK, Steward CD, Killgore GE, Chaitram JM, McAllister SK, Tenover FC: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41 (11): 5113-5120. 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5113-5120.2003.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pan ES, Diep BA, Carleton HA, Charlebois ED, Sensabaugh GF, Haller BL, Perdreau-Remington F: Increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in California jails. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 37 (10): 1384-1388. 10.1086/379019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mishaan AM, Mason EO, Martinez-Aguilar G, Hammerman W, Propst JJ, Stankiewicz P, Kaplan SL, Hulten K: Emergence of a predominant clone of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus among children in Houston, Texas. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005, 24 (3): 201-206. 10.1097/01.inf.0000151107.29132.70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dietrich DW, Auld DB, Mermel LA: Community-acquiredmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in southern New England children. Pediatrics. 2004, 113 (4): e347-352. 10.1542/peds.113.4.e347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kazakova SV, Hageman JC, Matava M, Srinivasan A, Phelan L, Garfinkel B, Boo T, McAllister S, Anderson J, Jensen B, Dodson D, Lonsway D, McDougal LK, Arduino M, Fraser VJ, Killgore G, Tenover FC, Cody S, Jernigan DB: A clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among professional football players. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352 (5): 468-475. 10.1056/NEJMoa042859.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, Talan DA: Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355 (7): 666-674. 10.1056/NEJMoa055356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kaplan SL, Hulten KG, Gonzalez BE, Hammerman WA, Lamberth L, Versalovic J, Mason EO: Three-year surveillance of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infections in children. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 40 (12): 1785-1791. 10.1086/430312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gonzalez BE, Hulten KG, Dishop MK, Lamberth LB, Hammerman WA, Mason EO, Kaplan SL: Pulmonary manifestations in childrenwith invasive community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 41 (5): 583-590. 10.1086/432475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gonzalez BE, Martinez-Aguilar G, Hulten KG, Hammerman WA, Coss-Bu J, Avalos-Mishaan A, Mason EO, Kaplan SL: Severe staphylococcal sepsis in adolescents in the era of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pediatrics. 2005, 115 (3): 642-648. 10.1542/peds.2004-2300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kaplan SL: Treatment of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005, 24 (5): 457-8. 10.1097/01.inf.0000164162.00163.9d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Bocchini CE, Hulten KG, Mason EO, Gonzalez BE, Hammerman WA, Kaplan SL: Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes are associated with enhanced inflammatory response and local disease in acute hematogenous Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in children. Pediatrics. 2006, 117 (2): 433-440. 10.1542/peds.2005-0566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gonzalez BE, Hulten KG, Teruya J, Hammerman W, Mason EO, Kaplan SL: Deep venous thrombophlebitis in patients with Staphylococcus aureus infections. Society for Pediatric Res: 2005. 2005

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Rieg G, Mehdi S, Perlroth J, Bayer AS, Tang AW, Phung TO, Spellberg B: Necrotizing fasciitis caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Los Angeles. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352 (14): 1445-1453. 10.1056/NEJMoa042683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Francis JS, Doherty MC, Lopatin U, Johnston CP, Sinha G, Ross T, Cai M, Hansel NN, Perl T, Ticehurst JR, Carroll K, Thomas DL, Nuermberger E, Bartlett JG: Severe community-onset pneumonia in healthy adults caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 40 (1): 100-107. 10.1086/427148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gonzalez BE, Teruya J, Mahoney DH, Hulten KG, Edwards R, Lamberth LB, Hammerman WA, Mason EO, Kaplan SL: Venous thrombosis associated with staphylococcal osteomyelitis in children. Pediatrics. 2006, 117 (5): 1673-1679. 10.1542/peds.2005-2009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG: Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38 (3): 1008-1015.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Robinson DA, Enright MC: Evolutionary models of the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47 (12): 3926-3934. 10.1128/AAC.47.12.3926-3934.2003.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Diep BA, Gill SR, Chang RF, Phan TH, Chen JH, Davidson MG, Lin F, Lin J, Carleton HA, Mongodin EF, Sensabaugh GF, Perdreau-Remington F: Complete genome sequence of USA300, an epidemic clone of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2006, 367 (9512): 731-739. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68231-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gill SR, Fouts DE, Archer GL, Mongodin EF, Deboy RT, Ravel J, Paulsen IT, Kolonay JF, Brinkac L, Beanan M, Dodson RJ, Daugherty SC, Madupu R, Angiuoli SV, Durkin AS, Haft DH, Vamathevan J, Khouri H, Utterback T, Lee C, Dimitrov G, Jiang L, Qin H, Weidman J, Tran K, Kang K, Hance IR, Nelson KE, Fraser CM: Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (7): 2426-2438. 10.1128/JB.187.7.2426-2438.2005.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Novick RP, Subedi A: The SaPIs: mobile pathogenicity islands of Staphylococcus. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2007, 93: 42-57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Lindsay JA, Holden MT: Staphylococcus aureus: superbug, super genome?. Trends Microbiol. 2004, 12 (8): 378-385. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.06.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Narita S, Kaneko J, Chiba J, Piemont Y, Jarraud S, Etienne J, Kamio Y: Phage conversion of Panton-Valentine leukocidin in Staphylococcus aureus: molecular analysis of a PVL-converting phage, phiSLT. Gene. 2001, 268 (1–2): 195-206. 10.1016/S0378-1119(01)00390-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kaneko J, Kimura T, Narita S, Tomita T, Kamio Y: Complete nucleotide sequence and molecular characterization of the temperate staphylococcal bacteriophage phiPVL carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes. Gene. 1998, 215 (1): 57-67. 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00278-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    van Wamel WJ, Rooijakkers SH, Ruyken M, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA: The innate immune modulators staphylococcal complementinhibitor and chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus are located on beta-hemolysin-converting bacteriophages. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (4): 1310-1315. 10.1128/JB.188.4.1310-1315.2006.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bayer AS, McNamara P, Yeaman MR, Lucindo N, Jones T, Cheung AL, Sahl HG, Proctor RA: Transposon disruption of the complex I NADH oxidoreductase gene (snoD) in Staphylococcus aureus is associated with reduced susceptibility to the microbicidal activity of thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein 1. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188 (1): 211-222. 10.1128/JB.188.1.211-222.2006.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sreedharan S, Oram M, Jensen B, Peterson LR, Fisher LM: DNA gyrase gyrA mutations in ciprofloxacin-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus: close similarity with quinolone resistance mutations in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1990, 172 (12): 7260-7262.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ferrero L, Cameron B, Crouzet J: Analysis of gyrA and grlA mutations in stepwise-selected ciprofloxacin-resistant mutants of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995, 39 (7): 1554-1558.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, Bemben LA, Berka J, Braverman MS, Chen YJ, Chen Z, Dewell SB, Du L, Fierro JM, Gomes XV, Godwin BC, He W, Helgesen S, Ho CH, Irzyk GP, Jando SC, Alenquer ML, Jarvie TP, Jirage KB, Kim JB, Knight JR, Lanza JR, Leamon JH, Lefkowitz SM, Lei M, Li J, Lohman KL, Lu H, Makhijani VB, McDade KE, McKenna MP, Myers EW, Nickerson E, Nobile JR, Plant R, Puc BP, Ronan MT, Roth GT, Sarkis GJ, Simons JF, Simpson JW, Srinivasan M, Tartaro KR, Tomasz A, Vogt KA, Volkmer GA, Wang SH, Wang Y, Weiner MP, Yu P, Begley RF, Rothberg JM: Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature. 2005, 437 (7057): 376-380.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT: Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (7): 1394-1403. 10.1101/gr.2289704.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bowden MG, Visai L, Longshaw CM, Holland KT, Speziale P, Hook M: Is the GehD lipase from Staphylococcus epidermidis a collagen binding adhesin. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 43017-43023. 10.1074/jbc.M207921200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Jose J, Christians S, Rosenstein R, Gotz F, Kaltwasser H: Cloning and expression of various staphylococcal genes encoding urease in Staphylococcus carnosus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1991, 64 (2–3): 277-281. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1991.tb04675.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Francis MS: Mutants in the CtpA copper transportingP-type ATPase reduce virulence of Listeria monocytogenes. Microb Pathog. 1997, 22 (2): 67-78. 10.1006/mpat.1996.0092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bendtsen JD, Kiemer L, Fausboll A, Brunak S: Non-classical protein secretion in bacteria. BMC Microbiol. 2005, 5: 58-10.1186/1471-2180-5-58.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    The network on antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. [http://www.narsa.net/]

  41. 41.

    Clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Sixteenth informational supplement M100-S16 (M7) Table 2C MIC interpretive standards (μg/ml) for Staphylococcus aureus Wayne, PA: CLSI. 2006

  42. 42.

    Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2001, Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 3

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Andersson B, Wentland MA, Ricafrente JY, Liu W, Gibbs RA: A "double adaptor" method for improved shotgun library construction. Anal Biochem. 1996, 236 (1): 107-113. 10.1006/abio.1996.0138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Havlak P, Chen R, Durbin KJ, Egan A, Ren Y, Song XZ, Weinstock GM, Gibbs RA: The Atlas genome assembly system. Genome Res. 2004, 14 (4): 721-732. 10.1101/gr.2264004.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL: Improved microbial identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27: 4636-4641. 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Lukashin A, Borodovsky M: GeneMark.hmm: new solutions for gene finding. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26 (4): 1107-1115. 10.1093/nar/26.4.1107.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Genboree. [http://www.genboree.org/]

  48. 48.

    McLeod MP, Qin X, Karpathy SE, Gioia J, Highlander SK, Fox GE, McNeill TZ, Jiang H, Muzny D, Jacob LS, Hawes AC, Sodergren E, Gill R, Hume J, Morgan M, Fan G, Amin AG, Gibbs RA, Hong C, Yu XJ, Walker DH, Weinstock GM: Complete genome sequence of Rickettsia typhi and comparison with sequences of other rickettsiae. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (17): 5842-5855. 10.1128/JB.186.17.5842-5855.2004.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R: InterProScan – an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics. 2001, 17 (9): 847-848. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.9.847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hawkins T, Luban S, Kihara D: Enhanced automated function prediction using distantly related sequences and contextual association by PFP. Protein Sci. 2006, 15 (6): 1550-1556. 10.1110/ps.062153506.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Gardy JL, Laird MR, Chen F, Rey S, Walsh CJ, Ester M, Brinkman FSL: PSORTb v.2.0: Expanded prediction of bacterial protein subcellular localization and insights gained from comparative proteome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2004, 21 (5): 617-623. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Dodd IB, Egan JB: The prediction of helix-turn-helix DNA-binding regions in proteins. Protein Eng. 1988, 2 (3): 174-175. 10.1093/protein/2.3.174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Rawlings ND, Morton FR, Barrett AJ: MEROPS: the peptidase database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: D270-D272. 10.1093/nar/gkj089.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Saier MH, Tran CV, Barabote RD: TCDB: the Transporter Classification Database for membrane transport protein analyses and information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, D181-186. 10.1093/nar/gkj001. 34 Database

  55. 55.

    Bengert P, Dandekar T: Riboswitch finder – a tool for identification of riboswitch RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (Web Server issue): W154-9. 10.1093/nar/gkh352.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Abreu-Goodger C, Merino E: RibEx: a web server for locating riboswitches and other conserved bacterial regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33: W690-W692. 10.1093/nar/gki445.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22: 4673-4680. 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007, 24 (8): 1596-1599. 10.1093/molbev/msm092.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prisma Energy International and Vivian L. Smith Foundation for funding this project. We also would like to thank Magnus Hook, Gabriella Bowden, Berenice Carrillo, and Petra Matejkova for assistance during the early phases of the project.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    Sarah K Highlander, Joseph Petrosino, Ana Maria Cardenas & George M Weinstock

  2. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA

    Kristina G Hultén, Edward O Mason Jr, Régine M Fortunov & Sheldon L Kaplan

  3. Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    Sarah K Highlander, Xiang Qin, Huaiyang Jiang, Shailaja Yerrapragada, Yue Shang, Tiffany M Williams, Okezie Igboeli, Donna M Muzny, Lisa Hemphill, Yan Ding, Shannon Dugan, Peter R Blyth, Christian J Buhay, Huyen H Dinh, Alicia C Hawes, Michael Holder, Christie L Kovar, Sandra L Lee, Wen Liu, Lynne V Nazareth, Qiaoyan Wang, Jianling Zhou & George M Weinstock

  4. Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

    George M Weinstock

  5. University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX, USA

    Akif Uzman

  6. University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA

    Yamei Liu, Madhan Tirumalai & George E Fox

Authors
  1. Sarah K Highlander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kristina G Hultén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiang Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huaiyang Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shailaja Yerrapragada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Edward O Mason Jr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yue Shang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Tiffany M Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Régine M Fortunov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yamei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Okezie Igboeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Joseph Petrosino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Madhan Tirumalai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Akif Uzman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. George E Fox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Ana Maria Cardenas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Donna M Muzny
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Lisa Hemphill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Yan Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Shannon Dugan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Peter R Blyth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  22. Christian J Buhay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  23. Huyen H Dinh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  24. Alicia C Hawes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  25. Michael Holder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  26. Christie L Kovar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  27. Sandra L Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  28. Wen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  29. Lynne V Nazareth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  30. Qiaoyan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  31. Jianling Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  32. Sheldon L Kaplan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  33. George M Weinstock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah K Highlander.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

SKH performed much of the post-annotation analysis and wrote the draft of the manuscript. SKH, KGH, EOM, RMF, YL, OI, SY, JP, MT, AU, GEF annotated the genome. XQ and HJ contributed bioinformatics support. YS, TMW and AMC performed the SNP verification. DMM, LH, YD, SD, PRB, CJB, HHD, ACH, MH, CLK, SLL, WL, LVN, QW and JZ composed the sequencing and finishing team. KGH, RMF, EOM, SLK and GMW assisted critical review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Highlander, S.K., Hultén, K.G., Qin, X. et al. Subtle genetic changes enhance virulence of methicillin resistant and sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. BMC Microbiol 7, 99 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-7-99

Download citation

Keywords

  • Whole Genome Shotgun
  • Arginine Deiminase
  • MSSA Strain
  • Virulence Factor Gene
  • Arginine Catabolic Mobile Element

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us