- Research article
- Open Access
A ring-like nucleoid is not necessary for radioresistance in the Deinococcaceae
© Zimmerman and Battista; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
- Received: 12 November 2004
- Accepted: 31 March 2005
- Published: 31 March 2005
Transmission electron microscopy images of Deinococcus radiodurans R1 suggest that the nucleoid of this species exists as a "ring-like" body, and have led to speculation that this structure contributes to the radioresistance of the species. Since extreme radioresistance is characteristic of six other species of Deinococcus, we have attempted to correlate nucleoid morphology and radioresistance by determining whether the genomic DNA of each of these species exhibit similar structures.
The nucleoid morphologies of seven recognized species of Deinococcus, the radioresistant bacterium Rubrobacter radiotolerans, and the more radiosensitive deinococcal relative Thermus aquaticus were evaluated using epifluorescence and deconvolution techniques. Although the nucleoids of Deinococcus murrayi, Deinococcus proteolyticus, Deinococcus radiophilus, and Deinococcus grandis have structures similar to D. radiodurans, the majority of nucleoids found in Deinococcus radiopugnans and Deinococcus geothermalis lack any specific organization. The nucleoid of R. radiotolerans consists of multiple highly condensed spheres of DNA scattered throughout the cell. The genomic DNA of Thermus aquaticus is uniformly distributed throughout the cell.
There is no obvious relationship between the shape of a species' nucleoid and extreme radioresistance. However, the genomes of all extremely radioresistance species examined are highly condensed relative to more radiosensitive species. Whether DNA in this tightly packed configuration contributes to the radioresistance of these bacteria remains unknown, but this common structural feature appears to limit diffusion of fragments generated post-irradiation even in cells incapable of repairing strand breaks.
- Stationary Phase Culture
- Nucleoid Structure
- Ionize Radiation Resistance
- Condensed Sphere
- Pyridinium Dibromide
The Deinococcaceae are a small family within the domain Bacteria that are distinguished by their ability to tolerate DNA double strand breaks [1, 2]. There are eleven validly described species and seven of these tolerate what for most microorganisms is a sterilizing dose of ionizing radiation, exhibiting detectable survival after exposure to 10 kGy (1,000,000 Rad) γ radiation . The ionizing radiation resistance of the four remaining species, Deinococcus indicus , Deinococcus frigens, Deinococcus saxicola, and Deinococcus marmoris  has not been reported. Ionizing radiation generates an array of DNA damage in the target cell, including many types of base damage, single, and double strand breaks . Of these types of damage, DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are considered the greatest threat to cell viability, and an excessive number of DSBs are expected to be lethal. E. coli, for example, cannot survive introduction of greater than one or two DSBs into its genome . In contrast, D. radiodurans survives doses of ionizing radiation that generate greater than 100 DSBs per genome without mutation or loss of viability [8–10]. It is the ability to endure and accurately repair these lesions that set the deinococci apart from other species.
The reasons for the deinococci's radioresistance are poorly understood. Genetic and biochemical evidence obtained from D. radiodurans, the best studied of these species, argues that recovery requires RecA-mediated homologous recombination [9, 11, 12]. D. radiodurans is multi-genomic, and depending on the growth phase, cells contain from 4 to 10 copies of their genome depending on growth conditions [13, 14]. It is believed that this increased DNA content is protective in that it serves as a reservoir of genetic information that can be used during recombinational repair. In addition, it has been suggested that there may be a pre-existing alignment of homologous sequences between copies of the genome and that this alignment accounts for the remarkable speed and fidelity of DNA double strand break repair in this species . However, the existence of such an alignment has not been established.
Levin-Zaidman et al.  have reported that the genome of D. radiodurans assumes a tightly packed ring-like structure that may represent an alternative mechanism for protecting D. radiodurans from DSBs. These authors suggest this structure contributes to D. radiodurans radioresistance by preventing fragments formed by DSBs from diffusing apart during repair. Having the capacity to maintain the linear continuity of its genome in the face of the extensive fragmentation resulting from high dose ionizing radiation would provide obvious advantages to D. radiodurans. Assuming that DNA repair proteins can function within the proposed structure, gene order is preserved and the gaps generated by damage and subsequent DNA degradation could be bridged by homologous recombination with redundant genetic information available in the genome copies. Such an arrangement does not require a pre-existing alignment between sequences, but if homologous genetic information is aligned prior to irradiation, the time needed to effect repairs should be reduced.
In an attempt to gain insight into whether the structures reported by Levin-Zaidman et al contribute to ionizing radiation resistance, we have combined epifluorescence and deconvolution microscopy to describe the structure of the nucleoid of the seven species of the Deinococcaceae known to be ionizing radiation resistant. We assume that if ring-like structures are required for extreme radioresistance, all deinococci will contain a similarly organized nucleoid. In addition, we have examined the nucleoid structure of a related but less radioresistant species, Thermus aquaticus, and a phylogenetically distinct, but more radioresistant  species Rubrobacter radiotolerans seeking to correlate variations in nucleoid morphology with radioresistance. We find little evidence to support the assertion that a specific nucleoid structure is required for bacterial ionizing radiation resistance, but note that the genomic DNA of the most radioresistant species examined is more condensed relative to more radiosensitive species, suggesting that this generic feature is passively facilitating repair processes.
The nucleoid of Deinococcus radiodurans R1
The nucleoid of most, but not all, species of Deinococcus is similar to that of D. radiodurans R1
The nucleoid of Thermus aquaticus
The nucleoid of Rubrobacter radiotolerans
The effect of ionizing radiation on nucleoid morphology
The notion that the release of fragments from the damaged genome of D. radiodurans is limited is also apparent in our analysis of the effects of ionizing radiation on the nucleoid of the recA strain, rec30. The rec30 strain, which lacks the ability to carry out homologous recombination [8, 9], is incapable of reassembling its genome following irradiation. However, like R1, the nucleoid of rec30 remains a coherent structure (Fig. 11C) two hours post-irradiation, providing further evidence that fragments generated do not diffuse throughout the cytosol despite the presence of massive numbers of un-repaired DNA double strand breaks.
Levin-Zaidman et al  have reported that genomic DNA of stationary phase cells of D. radiodurans is ordered as a tightly packed toroid, and it has been argued that this organization is in part responsible for D. radiodurans resistance to ionizing radiation [16, 19]. These authors assume that the dense packaging characteristic of toroids restricts the diffusion of DNA fragments generated when cells are exposed to ionizing radiation, preventing a loss of genetic information that is needed for effective recovery from the insult. However, these authors also describe logarithmic phase cultures of D. radiodurans R1, and indicate that the nucleoids of these cells do not always exhibit a toroidal ring-like morphology even though they remain extremely radioresistant . This observation seems to argue against a requirement for involvement of a specific nucleoid structure in ionizing radiation resistance. In addition, Daly et al  have demonstrated that growth in different media alters the organization of the nucleoid of D. radiodurans, and that the change does not correspond to changes in radioresistance. This group reports that ring-like nucleoids predominate in cultures growing in defined minimal medium, but that these cultures are more sensitive to ionizing radiation than cultures with fewer ring-like nucleoids growing in a rich medium.
We initiated this study in an attempt to correlate nucleoid structure with radioresistance, reasoning that if the inferences of Levin-Zaidman et al  are correct, it will be reflected in morphological differences between radioresistant and radiosensitive species. We have examined species known to be ionizing radiation resistant as well as strains that are more sensitive to γ irradiation, and in agreement with Daly et al  find no compelling evidence that specific structures contribute to radioresistance. We base this conclusion on our failure to identify a distinctive repetitive pattern in the DAPI-stained DNA associated with the majority of D. geothermalis and D. radiopugnans cells in stationary phase culture. Cultures of D. geothermalis  and D. radiopugnans  are as radioresistant as D. radiodurans, but their genomes are more fluid, arguing that a nucleoid need not maintain a well-defined shape to sustain ionizing radiation resistance.
Despite this conclusion, we note that among the extremely radioresistant species examined DAPI-stained DNA is condensed relative to what is observed in E. coli and T. aquaticus. The DAPI is localized within the more radioresistant cells, and not spread throughout the cytosol. This aggregation of DNA indicates that a basic tenet of the model of Levin-Zaidman et al  may be valid: specifically that the deinococci utilize mechanisms for protecting the fragments generated by strand breaks including a passive process that limits the diffusion of these fragments. This concept is most clearly demonstrated by the behavior of rec30 strain subsequent to irradiation. Despite the fact that this strain is incapable of restituting the majority of the DSBs generated, the rec30 nucleoid retains its shape.
However, it must be noted that under certain conditions E. coli cells can undergo changes in nucleoid morphology similar to those reported for the deinococci. E. coli nucleoids become condensed spheres with cores of unknown composition when protein synthesis is inhibited , and when the mukB locus is disrupted the resulting mutant maintains a ring-like nucleoid . Clearly, since E. coli strains are much more sensitive to ionizing radiation relative to D. radiodurans, the presence of a condensed nucleoid alone is not a sufficient explanation for radioresistance. Instead, we assume the combination of a condensed nucleoid structure and unique protein-dependent DNA repair mechanisms is responsible for the radioresistant phenotype displayed by the deinococci.
The physical basis for the condensed nucleoid we observe is unknown. We suspect that this level of spatial organization is in large part mediated by proteins that either link copies of the genome together (assuming that a species contains more than one genome copy), or coordinates genome folding in a manner that generates the shapes we have described. For those species, such as D. radiodurans or D. murrayi, in which the nucleoid forms an obvious structure, we envision a protein lattice that acts as a scaffold that the genome is organized around. We predict these proteins are functionally analogous to the SMC (structural maintenance of chromosomes) proteins described in many eukaryotic and prokaryotic species [26–28]. It seems unlikely that genomic DNA is as condensed as the DNA-Dps assemblies described in some stationary phase bacteria [29, 30]. These structures are tightly packed, almost crystalline, and it is difficult to envision how an actively metabolizing cell could function under this circumstance; the DNA needs to remain accessible to proteins that catalyze essential housekeeping functions.
We also predict that the ionic composition of the cytosol of the deinococci examined favors the formation of the structures we observe. The Deinococcaceae exhibit unusually high intracellular levels of Mn+2  and it is possible that accumulating this metal creates an environment that facilitates DNA condensation within this species in vivo through direct or indirect mechanisms. In vitro, the condensation of DNA can be achieved by adding a condensing agent, such as a multivalent cation, to an aqueous solution of DNA. The strong electrostatic interaction of the DNA and these cations neutralizes the repulsion of phosphate groups in the DNA backbone, and it has been shown that approximately 90% of the DNA charge must be neutralized for condensation to occur . Intracellular Mn+2 may also indirectly facilitate nucleoid condensation by, for example, augmenting the function of deinococcal DNA-binding proteins. On the other hand, high Mn+2 content may have no affect on nucleoid morphology since, as described above, E. coli can have a condensed nucleoid even though this species has a much lower level of intracellular Mn+2 .
Years of experimental evidence irrefutably argue that DNA repair is essential for D. radiodurans recovery from high dose exposure to ionizing radiation, but this fact does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that efficient DNA repair is sufficient for extreme radioresistance. Although there has been a great deal of speculation concerning subtle differences in the properties of DNA repair proteins isolated from D. radiodurans, there has yet to be a convincing demonstration that this species' DNA repair proteins are "better" relative to homologues found in more radiosensitive species. Given this, it remains a formal possibility that D. radiodurans DNA repair proteins function within a molecular environment that enhances their effectiveness. In other words, it seems likely that there are features of deinococcal physiology that augment DNA repair processes, allowing the conventional complement of DNA repair proteins to more efficiently deal with DNA damage. We believe that the images presented here suggest that the genomic DNA of the deinococci is more condensed relative to other species. We suggest that this aggregation is protective, and that it may significantly contribute to the radioresistance of these species by confining the fragments generated subsequent to irradiation and preserving the linear continuity of the damaged genome.
This work resulted in two key observations. First, all evidence obtained is consistent with the notion that the genomes of radioresistant species are more condensed than radiosensitive species. Second, irradiation does not seem to disturb the pattern of condensation observed in the deinococci, even when we examined that pattern in a recA defective strain incapable of repairing DNA double strand breaks. Therefore, in agreement with Levin-Zaidmen et al , we assume that the deinococci have the capacity to passively prevent the diffusion of DNA fragments post-irradiation, and that this ability may contribute to the radioresistance of these species.
Deinococcus radiodurans R1 (ATCC 13939), Deinococcus radiophilus (ATCC 27603), Deinococcus proteolyticus (ATCC 35074), Deinococcus radiopugnans (ATCC 19172), and Deinococcus grandis (ATCC 43672) were grown in TGY broth at 30°C as described elsewhere . Deinococcus geothermalis (DSM 11300) and Deinococcus murrayi (DSM 11303) were grown in TGY broth at 50°C . Rubrobacter radiotolerans (ATCC 51242) was grown at 30°C in a medium consisting of 1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% malt extract, 0.5% casamino acids, 0.2% meat extract, 0.2% glucose, 0.005% Tween 80, and 0.1% magnesium sulfate. Thermus aquaticus YT-1 (ATCC 25104) was grown at 70°C in Castenholz TYE medium (ATCC medium 723). E. coli AB1157 cultures were grown at 37°C in LB medium (1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 1% NaCl).
Unless otherwise indicated, all cultures were grown to stationary phase prior to microscopic examination. Cultures were harvested with the following densities as measured by OD600: D. radiodurans, 1.2–1.8; D. radiophilus 1.8–2.2; D. proteolyticus 2.0; D. radiopugnans 1.3–2.0; D. grandis 1.7; D. geothermalis 1.8; D. murrayi 1.3; R. radiotolerans 1.9; T. aquaticus 1.1. These values correspond to cultures with densities between 3 × 108 and 1.3 × 109 CFU/ml.
Cultured cells were stained with N-(3-triethylammoniumpropyl)-4-(6-(4(diethylamino) phenyl)hexatrienyl)pyridinium dibromide, (FM 4–64), and 4',6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride, (DAPI), for the visualization of the lipid membrane and DNA, respectively. Ratios of the amounts of stationary phase culture cells to fluorescent dyes were a 3:1:1 ratio of culture cells to 0.0625 μg/μL of FM 4–64 solution to 3 μg/mL DAPI solution. The cells were then mounted on slides coated with 0.5% agarose.
Figures 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 10 were created by capturing two-dimensional images at a series of points along the z-axis that were set at 100 nm apart. The N2.1 filter cube from Leica Microsystems was used for FM 4–64 detection, which includes a 580 nm longpass dichroic mirror, a 515–560 nm bandpass excitation filter, and a 590 nm long pass emission filter. The A4 filter cube from Leica Microsystems was used for DAPI detection, which includes a 400 nm longpass dichroic mirror, a 360-40 nm bandpass excitation filter, and a 470-40 nm bandpass emission filter. The optical series was deconvolved with Slidebook 4.0 from Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Inc., (Denver, CO), using constrained iterative deconvolution and was then imported into Adobe Photoshop 7.0 as separate two-dimensional images. The two-dimensional images were then arranged in order as depicted.
The projection image in Fig. 11A was achieved with the Slidebook 4.0 software by compiling the stack of two-dimensional images into a single two-dimensional image.
All images were captured using a Leica DMRXA2 microscope and a Sensicam QE camera from The Cooke Corporation, (Auburn Hills, MI). The brightness and contrast of all images were enhanced using Adobe Photoshop 7.0.
Ionizing radiation exposure
Cultures (grown in the appropriate medium) of D. radiodurans (OD600 0.12–0.19), D. radiopugnans (OD600 1.5–1.8), rec30 (OD600 1.4) and E. coli (OD600 0.23) were irradiated to a dose of 5000 Grays using a Model 484R 60Co irradiator (J. L. Sheppard & Associates, San Fernando, CA). Controls were kept at room temperature during irradiation exposure of experimental samples. All samples were incubated at the appropriate conditions immediately after irradiation. All of the cells were harvested after 2 hours of incubation and prepared for microscopy as described above.
Cultures were irradiated using the irradiator described above, and survival established by serial dilution of irradiated cultures and plating on appropriate growth medium. Three independent trials were conducted for each species examined with three replicates per trial. Sigma Plot software was used to create the survival curve.
The authors gratefully acknowledge Margaret C. Henk and David H. Burk of the Socolofsky Microscopy Center within the Department of Biological Sciences at LSU for their assistance and helpful discussions. This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy grant DEFG0201ER63151 awarded to J.R.B.
- Battista JR: Against all odds: the survival strategies of Deinococcus radiodurans. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1997, 51: 203-224. 10.1146/annurev.micro.51.1.203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Battista JR, Earl AM, Park MJ: Why is Deinococcus radiodurans so resistant to ionizing radiation?. Trends Microbiol. 1999, 7 (9): 362-365. 10.1016/S0966-842X(99)01566-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Battista JR, Rainey FA: Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology. 2001, New York , Springer, 1: 395-414.Phylum BIV. "Deinococcus-Thermus" Family 1. Deinococcaceae Brooks and Murray 1981, 356,vp emend. Rainey, Nobre, Schumann, Stackebrandt and da Costa 1997, 513, Boone DR, Castenholz RW, 2nd, The Archaea and the Deeply Branching and Phototrophic Bacteria, Garrity George M,Google Scholar
- Suresh K, Reddy GS, Sengupta S, Shivaji S: Deinococcus indicus sp. nov., an arsenic-resistant bacterium from an aquifer in West Bengal, India. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004, 54 (Pt 2): 457-461. 10.1099/ijs.0.02758-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirsch P, Gallikowski CA, Siebert J, Peissl K, Kroppenstedt R, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E, Anderson R: Deinococcus frigens sp. nov., Deinococcus saxicola sp. nov., and Deinococcus marmoris sp. nov., low temperature and draught-tolerating, UV-resistant bacteria from continental Antarctica. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2004, 27 (6): 636-645. 10.1078/0723202042370008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ward JF: Molecular mechanisms of radiation-induced damage to nucleic acids. Adv Rad Biol. 1975, 5: 181-239.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krasin F, Hutchinson F: Repair of DNA double-strand breaks in Escherichia coli, which requires recA function and the presence of a duplicate genome. J Mol Biol. 1977, 116: 81-98. 10.1016/0022-2836(77)90120-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daly MJ, Minton KW: Interchromosomal recombination in the extremely radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177 (19): 5495-5505.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daly MJ, Minton KW: An alternative pathway of recombination of chromosomal fragments precedes recA-dependent recombination in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178 (15): 4461-4471.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grimsley JK, Masters CI, Clark EP, Minton KW: Analysis by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of DNA double-strand breakage and repair in Deinococcus radiodurans and a radiosensitive mutant. Int J Radiat Biol. 1991, 60 (4): 613-626.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daly MJ, Ouyang L, Fuchs P, Minton KW: In vivo damage and recA-dependent repair of plasmid and chromosomal DNA in the radiation-resistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176 (12): 3508-3517.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moseley BE, Copland HJ: Isolation and properties of a recombination-deficient mutant of Micrococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol. 1975, 121 (2): 422-428.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hansen MT: Multiplicity of genome equivalents in the radiation-resistant bacterium Micrococcus radiodurans. J Bacteriol. 1978, 134 (1): 71-75.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harsojo, Kitayama S, Matsuyama A: Genome multiplicity and radiation resistance in Micrococcus radiodurans. J Biochem (Tokyo). 1981, 90 (3): 877-880.Google Scholar
- Minton KW, Daly MJ: A model for repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in the extreme radiophile Deinococcus radiodurans. Bioessays. 1995, 17 (5): 457-464. 10.1002/bies.950170514.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levin-Zaidman S, Englander J, Shimoni E, Sharma AK, Minton KW, Minsky A: Ringlike structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans genome: a key to radioresistance?. Science. 2003, 299 (5604): 254-256. 10.1126/science.1077865.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira AC, Nobre MF, Moore E, Rainey FA, Battista JR, da Costa MS: Characterization and radiation resistance of new isolates of Rubrobacter radiotolerans and Rubrobacter xylanophilus. Extremophiles. 1999, 3 (4): 235-238. 10.1007/s007920050121.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daly MJ, Gaidamakova EK, Matrosova VY, Vasilenko A, Zhai M, Venkateswaran A, Hess M, Omelchenko MV, Kostandarithes HM, Makarova KS, Wackett LP, Fredrickson JK, Ghosal D: Accumulation of Mn(II) in Deinococcus radiodurans Facilitates Gamma-Radiation Resistance. Science. 2004Google Scholar
- Englander J, Klein E, Brumfeld V, Sharma AK, Doherty AJ, Minsky A: DNA toroids: framework for DNA repair in Deinococcus radiodurans and in germinating bacterial spores. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (18): 5973-5977. 10.1128/JB.186.18.5973-5977.2004.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mattimore V, Udupa KS, Berne GA, Battista JR: Genetic characterization of forty ionizing radiation-sensitive strains of Deinococcus radiodurans: linkage information from transformation. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177 (18): 5232-5237.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pollard EC, Kraus K: All-or-nothing character of DNA degradation in bacteria after ionizing radiation. Biophys J. 1973, 13 (4): 332-339.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferreira AC, Nobre MF, Rainey FA, Silva MT, Wait R, Burghardt J, Chung AP, da Costa MS: Deinococcus geothermalis sp. nov. and Deinococcus murrayi sp. nov., two extremely radiation-resistant and slightly thermophilic species from hot springs. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997, 47 (4): 939-947.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Davis NS, Silverman GJ, Mausurosky EB: Radiation resistant, pigmented coccus isolated from Haddock tissue. J Bacteriol. 1963, 86: 294-298.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bohrmann B, Villiger W, Johansen R, Kellenberger E: Coralline shape of the bacterial nucleoid after cryofixation. J Bacteriol. 1991, 173 (10): 3149-3158.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niki H, Yamaichi Y, Hiraga S: Dynamic organization of chromosomal DNA in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 2000, 14 (2): 212-223.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cobbe N, Heck MM: Review: SMCs in the world of chromosome biology- from prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes. J Struct Biol. 2000, 129 (2-3): 123-143. 10.1006/jsbi.2000.4255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jessberger R: SMC proteins at the crossroads of diverse chromosomal processes. IUBMB Life. 2003, 55 (12): 643-652.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Volkov A, Mascarenhas J, Andrei-Selmer C, Ulrich HD, Graumann PL: A prokaryotic condensin/cohesin-like complex can actively compact chromosomes from a single position on the nucleoid and binds to DNA as a ring-like structure. Mol Cell Biol. 2003, 23 (16): 5638-5650. 10.1128/MCB.23.16.5638-5650.2003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frenkiel-Krispin D, Levin-Zaidman S, Shimoni E, Wolf SG, Wachtel EJ, Arad T, Finkel SE, Kolter R, Minsky A: Regulated phase transitions of bacterial chromatin: a non-enzymatic pathway for generic DNA protection. Embo J. 2001, 20 (5): 1184-1191. 10.1093/emboj/20.5.1184.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wolf SG, Frenkiel D, Arad T, Finkel SE, Kolter R, Minsky A: DNA protection by stress-induced biocrystallization. Nature. 1999, 400 (6739): 83-85. 10.1038/21918.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilson RW, Bloomfield VA: Counterion-induced condesation of deoxyribonucleic acid. a light-scattering study. Biochemistry. 1979, 18 (11): 2192-2196. 10.1021/bi00578a009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.