Global secretome characterization of A549 human alveolar epithelial carcinoma cells during Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection
© Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 15 October 2013
Accepted: 3 February 2014
Published: 7 February 2014
Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M. pneumoniae) is one of the major etiological agents for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in all age groups. The early host response to M. pneumoniae infection relies on the concerted release of proteins with various biological activities. However, no comprehensive analysis of the secretory proteins has been conducted to date regarding the host response upon M. pneumoniae infection.
We employed the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based label-free quantitative proteomic technology to identify and characterize the members of the human alveolar epithelial carcinoma A549 cell secretome during M. pneumoniae infection. A total of 256 proteins were identified, with 113 being differentially expressed (>1.5-fold change), among which 9 were only expressed in control cells, 10 only in M. pneumoniae-treated cells, while 55 were up-regulated and 39 down-regulated by M. pneumoniae. The changed expression of some of the identified proteins was validated by RT-PCR and immunoblot analysis. Cellular localization analysis of the secretome data revealed 59.38% of the proteins were considered as “putative secretory proteins”. Functional analysis revealed that the proteins affected upon M. pneumoniae infection were mainly related to metabolic process, stress response, and immune response. We further examined the level of one up-regulated protein, IL-33, in clinical samples. The result showed that IL-33 levels were significantly higher in the plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of M. pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) patients.
The present study provided systematic information about the changes in the expression of secretory proteins during M. pneumoniae infection, which is useful for the discovery of specific biomarkers and targets for pharmacological intervention.
Mycoplasma pnuemoniae (M. pneumoniae) belongs to the class of the Mollicutes and is one of the smallest free-living organisms. It is a major cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) worldwide in all age groups, and can also induce manifestations in extrapulmonary sites involving almost all organs of the human body [1, 2]. With the exception of M. pneumoniae adherence to the host epithelium, molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of M. pneumoniae infection has long been a mystery . Subsequent to cytadherence, M. pneumoniae is believed to cause disease in part through the generation of peroxide  and the induction of inflammatory reaction including cytokine productions (e.g. IL-8, TNF-α, and IL-1β) . Simultaneously, autoimmunity developed after M. pneumoniae infection likely contributes to the extrapulmonary complications. For example, anti-GM1 and galactocerebroside antibodies are the primary autoantibodies implicated in the ascending paralysis of Guillain-Barre syndrome and in encephalitis associated with M. pneumoniae[5, 6]. Although toxin had not been considered as part of the M. pneumoniae repertoire in previous studies, recent evidence suggested otherwise. A newly identified exotoxin of M. pneumoniae, named community-acquired respiratory distress syndrome toxin (CARDS TX), which has ADP-ribosylating and vacuolating activity, has been suggested to be responsible for eliciting extensive vacuolization and ciliostasis of host cells . Thus, the pathophysiology of M. pneumoniae infection is likely to be complex and multifactorial, and the underlying molecular mechanisms should involve a large number of genes/proteins participating in various biological pathways [3, 8, 9]. High-throughput technologies including genomics and proteomics can comprehensively and quantitatively decipher gene/protein expression, and therefore, are useful tools in the study of complex systems under the influence of biological perturbations, such as pathogen-host interaction . Previously, using a proteomic approach, we had analyzed M. pneumoniae-induced protein expression profile using whole cell lysates, and identified the redox regulatory pathway as a key target during M. pneumoniae infection . However, as noted above, M. pneumoniae-induced immune response is important for M. pneumoniae pathogenesis, and many factors involved in the immune response, such as the cytokines, are so-called secretory proteins, which are part of the “secretome” .
Secretome proteins include extracellular matrix proteins, growth factors, cytokines and hormones, and other soluble mediators. It is known that secretory proteins are important for many physiological processes [11, 12]. For example, the matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), as extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes, are essential regulators of the cell’s microenvironment governing cell fate and function, such as cell migration, proliferation, apoptosis, invasion and development . Moreover, changes in secretory proteins can reflect different conditions of the cells or tissues. For instance, Lietzen et al. revealed dramatic changes in secretome of macrophages, such as robust secretion of different danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMP), in response to influenza A infection . Arturo et al. found that muscle secretion pattern varied according to fiber-type constituents (e.g. slow-oxidative compared to fast-glycolytic muscle), and the secretome could be affected by endurance exercise training . Consequently, secretome represent an important source for biomarker and therapeutic target discovery . For that importance, secretomics, a branch of proteomics, focusing on analyzing the profile of all proteins secreted from cells or tissues, has been developed in recent years .
In addition, recent studies have showed that secretory proteins are also important for certain disease conditions. For example, dysregulation of adipocytokines (e.g. TNF-α, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (SERPINE1), heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor) and adiponectin contributes to the development of a variety of cardiovascular disease . Similarly, secretory proteins also play a role in infectious disease. For instance, changes in the expression of secretory proteins during latent human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection have profound effects on the regulation of the host immune response, such as recruitment of CD4+ T cells by increasing the expression of CC chemokine ligand 8 (CCL-8) . Also, the secreted IFN-induced proteins (e.g. interferon-induced tetratricopeptide proteins 2 (IFIT2), IFIT3, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1)) were indicated to have important extracellular antiviral functions during Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) infection . Together, these data indicate the important role of secretory proteins in host-pathogen interaction. However, although M. pneumoniae infection is a common cause of respiratory disease, secretome change during M. pneumoniae infection had not been thoroughly investigated.
Airway epithelial cells form the first line of defense against exposure to infectious agents. Epithelial cells are known to kill or neutralize microorganisms through the production of enzymes, permeabilizing peptides, collectins, and protease inhibitors during the innate immune response . Epithelial cells are also essential in regulating adaptive immune responses in the airways by expressing pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) to trigger host defense response, by activating dendritic cells to regulate Ag sensitization, and by releasing cytokines to recruit effector cells [4, 19, 20]. Thus, airway epithelial cells are important for the initiation, maintenance, and regulation of both innate and adaptive immune responses, as well as modulating the transition from innate to adaptive immunity. As the interaction of M. pneumoniae with respiratory epithelial cells is a critical early step of pathogenesis , and considering the importance of secretory proteins, a large-scale study on M. pneumoniae-induced protein secretion will help elucidate the molecular mechanisms related to M. pneumoniae infection.
Therefore, in the current study, we applied liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based label-free quantitative shotgun proteomics approach for global profiling of the M. pneumoniae-infected human alveolar epithelial carcinoma A549 cell secretome, in an effort to provide a better view of host-pathogen interaction and identify novel molecules/biomarkers for M. pneumoniae infection. As reported here, we have identified 113 proteins affected by M. pneumoniae infection. Furthermore, we evaluated the clinical application of one identified protein, IL-33, as a “proof of concept” example, and the result showed that it could help to distinguish M. pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) patients from non-M. pneumoniae patients.
Label-free quantitative shotgun proteomic analysis of cell secretome upon M. pneumoniae infection
Based on the LC-MS/MS data, 233 proteins were identified in control A549 cells, with 187 being identified from all three biological replicates (see Additional file 3: Figure S3A), indicating a relatively good reproducibility. Similarly, 237 proteins were identified in M. pneumoniae-infected A549 cells, with 199 being identified from all three biological replicates (see Additional file 3: Figure S3B). Thus, a total of 256 proteins were identified, among which 214 proteins were detected in both groups, with 19 and 23 proteins being uniquely secreted by control cells and M. pneumoniae-infected cells, respectively (see Additional file 3: Figure S3C). Complete protein identification lists for control and M. pneumoniae-infected cells were provided in Additional files 4 and 5: Datasheet S1 and Table S1.
For the identified proteins, label-free quantitative comparison performed by DeCyder™ MS Differential software revealed that 113 proteins were significantly affected by M. pneumoniae infection (fold difference ≥1.5 or ≤0.67) (see Additional file 6: Table S2). Specifically, there were 65 up-regulated and 48 down-regulated proteins in M. pneumoniae-infected A549 cells, among which 10 were uniquely expressed in M. pneumoniae-treated A549 and 9 in control A549 cells. For all 113 differential proteins, the number of peptides for each protein used for quantification varied from 1 to 13. Among them, 33 proteins were quantified on the basis of two or more peptides, with average coefficient of variation (CV) of the fold changes for peptides as 16.80% (range from 0.00% to 39.21%, see Additional file 6: Table S2), demonstrating a rational reproducibility of the quantitative data. The rest 80 proteins were quantified with only one peptide by the DeCyder software.
Validation of proteins with changed expression during M. pneumoniae infection
Cellular localization of the identified proteins
The 256 identified proteins were first categorized as classical secretory proteins or non-classical secretory proteins based on SingalP and SecretomeP analysis. Of the 256 proteins, 83 were categorized as classical secretory proteins and 69 as non-classical secretory proteins (see Additional file 5: Table S1). To determine whether some of the proteins could also be released via exosomes, the Exocarta exosome database were searched . The results showed that among the proteins identified, 190 proteins were also listed in the exosomal protein database (see Additional file 5: Table S1).
Functional classification of the differentially expressed secretory proteins
KEGG analysis of differential expressed protein after Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection
3939, 4191, 4190, 231, 5315, 3945
3939, 7167, 2023, 5315, 3945, 2821
10971, 7529, 5501, 801, 7534, 7532, 7531
hsa00030:Pentose phosphate pathway
2539, 7086, 2821, 5226
hsa00270:Cysteine and methionine metabolism
3939, 191, 3945, 2805
hsa04722:Neurotrophin signaling pathway
10971, 7529, 801, 7534, 7532, 7531
2950, 2539, 2936, 5226
hsa05130:Pathogenic Escherichia coli infection
10971, 7534, 3875, 10376
hsa04810:Regulation of actin cytoskeleton
80310, 4478, 5501, 2335, 81, 5216, 1072
hsa00051:Fructose and mannose metabolism
7167, 231, 57016
10971, 7529, 7534, 7532, 7531
In addition, an enrichment analysis was performed by BiNGO for the differentially expressed proteins. For the up-regulated proteins, GO analysis revealed 19 molecular function GO categories associated with oxidoreductase activity, 18 related to protein binding, and 16 linked to enzyme regulator activity (see Additional file 7: Figure S4B), while for the down-regulated proteins, 54 GO terms were identified, which were mainly associated with enzyme inhibitor activity and hydrolase activity (see Additional file 7: Figure S4C).
Immune response and stress related proteins that were up-regulated by Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection
Genes in test set
Stress related proteins and functions
Response to wounding
Response to stress
Response to stimulus
Response to virus
Response to other organism
Response to oxidative stress
Response to chemical stimulus
Response to biotic stimulus
Response to inorganic substance
Response to organic substance
Response to drug
Response to reactive oxygen species
Immune response related proteins and functions
Immune system process
Histamine secretion involved in inflammatory response
Antigen processing and presentation of exogenous peptide antigen via MHC class Ib
Antigen processing and presentation of exogenous protein antigen via MHC class Ib, TAP-dependent
Histamine production involved in inflammatory response
Positive regulation of leukotriene production involved in inflammatory response
Regulation of leukotriene production involved in inflammatory response
Positive regulation of macrophage fusion
Leukocyte mediated immunity
Positive regulation of immune system process
Protein-protein interaction network analysis during M. pneumoniae infection
Clinical examination of IL-33 expression in plasma and BALF
Clinical information of patients with MPP or FB
FB (n = 15)
MPP (n = 30)
4.88 ± 3.58
5.78 ± 2.46
Peripheral leukocyte (×109 cells/L)
7.00 ± 1.64
9.06 ± 4.10
Peripheral neutrophil (%)
46.95 ± 20.89
63.90 ± 16.20
BAL macrophage (%)
84.73 ± 6.45
66.53 ± 13.71
BAL lymphocyte (%)
9.73 ± 3.88
11.93 ± 6.39
BAL neutrophil (%)
5.53 ± 3.68
20.73 ± 13.47
BAL eosinophil (%)
0.20 ± 0.41
0.83 ± 2.35
By using comprehensive MS-based proteomics combined with label-free quantitation algorithms, we examined the secretome of M. pneumoniae-infected and uninfected A549 cells. This proteomic approach allows the simultaneous observation of alternation in protein expression, which may represent a forecast to disease development or a consequence of the disease . As reported here, a total of 256 proteins were identified, among which 113 were differentially secreted by M. pneumoniae-infected A549 cells versus control. This result is similar to a study conducted by Brioschi et al., in which 273 proteins were identified and 112 differentially expressed in the endothelial cell secretome upon reductase inhibitor treatment .
Among the identified proteins, 152 proteins were designated as putative secretory proteins by using SignalP and SecretomeP. Interestingly, 69 out of the 152 proteins were categorized as non-classical secretory proteins, suggesting that the unconventional protein release is also a major mechanism. More importantly, as exosomal release is also regarded as a non-classical secretion mechanism , it was shown that 74% (190 out of 256) of the identified proteins in our study can be found in the ExoCarta database, highlighting a critical role for exosome in cell-cell communication . In summary, up to 92% (236 out of 256) of the identified proteins could be transported to the extracellular space by at least one of the above mechanisms. Since no significant apoptosis or necrosis was observed in our study (see Additional file 2: Figure S2), those proteins, which were not classified as secretory proteins using the computational approach (SignalP and SecretomeP), should be released mainly by intracellular secretion (e.g. exosome) rather than cell lysis . Furthermore, among the 113 differentially expressed proteins, about 80% (91) were found in the ExoCarta database, suggesting that exosomal protein release might be a major mechanism by which M. pneumoniae-infected cells communicate with other cells. Similarly, exosome-mediated release of proteins in influenza A virus-infected human macrophages has also been reported, underlining the importance of the exosome-mediated non-classical pathway in cell-to-cell communication during microbial infection .
Based on STRING bioinformatics analysis, several clusters of proteins were identified (Figure 5 and 6), suggesting that these proteins often act in cooperation with each other rather than alone during M. pneumoniae infection. Furthermore, the functions of those differential expressed proteins were found to be mainly associated with biological processes including immune response, metabolic process, and stress response (see Additional file 7: Figure S4D and S4E). Indeed, a number of studies have highlighted the importance of host-dependent inflammatory response to M. pneumoniae infection, such as IL-12 and IFN-γ production, as well as the Th1 type T-cell responses in a mouse model [4, 31–34]. Previously we have also shown that the reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by M. pneumoniae infection attributed in part to the cytopathology of the respiratory epithelium , and M. pneumoniae infection could influence host’s sphingolipid metabolism, including the generation of new ceramide and sphingomyelin species . These reports, together with many other reports, supported the finding from this secretomic study that M. pneumoniae infection systematically alters the biological process of the host, which may partially explain the wide clinical manifestation of M. pneumoniae infection .
Cells under stress are known to actively secrete or passively release endogenous danger signal molecules, which include proteins and other endogenous molecules, such as ATP and uric acid [23, 36]. Interestingly, we have found 36 out of the 113 differentially expressed proteins were associated with stress and may act as endogenous danger signals (Table 2) [23, 24], including heat shock protein beta-1 (HSPB1), galectin-1 (Gal-1), galectin-3-binding protein (LGALS3BP), SERPINE1, disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain-containing protein 9 (ADAM9), peroxiredoxin-4 (PRDX4), and PRDX1. Several of these danger signal proteins, such as HSPs, galectins, and redox-related members, were also secreted during influenza A virus or HSV-1 infection of human macrophages [10, 18]. Therefore, the secretion of such danger signal proteins might be a general host response to pathogen infection. Some of these danger signal molecules were involved in regulating the cellular oxidative status, such as ADAM9, Gal-1 and SERPINE1 [37–39]. In line with such observation, M. pneumoniae is known to induce ROS production and reduce glutathione levels in lung and lung carcinoma cells [3, 40]. Furthermore, M. pneumoniae can inhibit host cell catalase, which could result in the toxicity of hydrogen peroxide in skin fibroblast and ciliated epithelial cells . Together, these results implicate that the enhanced ROS production should be recognized as an important mechanism in the pathogenesis of M. pneumoniae infection .
In addition, many identified proteins were involved in extracellular matrix formation (Figure 4 and see Additional file 7: Figure S4A). Extracellular matrix plays an important role in regulating many cellular functions like adhesion, cell shape, migration, proliferation, polarity, differentiation, and apoptosis . For example, SERPINE1, as a multifaceted proteolytic factor, not only functions as an inhibitor of the serine protease, but also plays an important role in signal transduction, cell adhesion, and migration . Similarly, ADAM9, a member of the ADAM family, is involved in the proteolytic processing of multiple transmembrane proteins, as well as cell adhesion, migration, and signal transduction . Gal-1 also displays diverse biological activities including cell adhesion, B cell development, mRNA splicing, angiogenesis and tissue differential/homeostasis, and inflammation . Thus, targeting the interplay between host cells and microenviroment might be another important mechanism for M. pneumoniae pathogenesis.
Finally, we were interested in the potential clinical application of such secretomic study, e.g. biomarker or therapeutic target discovery . To do that, we chose one of the identified proteins, IL-33, and conducted a “proof-of-concept” experiment. IL-33, a crucial amplifier of the innate immunity in infectious diseases as well as in autoimmune processes, is also a recently identified DAMP [46–48]. It has been shown that IL-33 plays an important role in driving antiviral CD8+ T cell responses in lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-infected mice . During the experimental intestinal nematodes (Trichuris muris) infection in mice, IL-33 was markedly elevated soon after infection . Schmitz and co-workers demonstrated that injection of IL-33 into mice induced a profound eosinophilia with associated pathologic changes , and had potent effects on eosinophil, including the induced production of superoxide anion and IL-8, degranulation and eosinophil survival . We found M. pneumoniae significantly increased IL-33 production in A549 cells, and IL-33 levels were significantly higher in MPP patients, implying an important role for IL-33 in M. pneumoniae-elicited immune response (Figure 7). Further ROC analysis revealed that IL-33 could help distinguish MPP patients from patients with foreign objects. Thus, manipulation of IL-33 might represent a promising new therapeutic strategy for treating the inflammatory disorder during M. pneumoniae infection.
In the current study, we identified many differentially expressed secretory proteins during M. pneumoniae infection using the quantitative label-free MS method, through which complex regulatory networks have been revealed. Some of the proteins could be used as lead candidates for further functional and preclinical evaluation for their roles in M. pneumoniae infection. Such information will shed new light into the study of host response during M. pneumoniae infection for better understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms.
Mycoplasma pneumoniae culture
M. pneumoniae strain 29342 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) was cultured in mycoplasma broth at 37°C under 5% (v/v) humidified CO2, consisting of mycoplasma broth base CM403 (OXIOD, Hampshire, United Kingdom), mycoplasma selective supplement G SR59 (OXIOD), 0.5% glucose, and 0.002% phenol red. Agar plates used for colony counting were prepared similarly, but containing mycoplasma agar base CM401 (OXIOD) instead of mycoplasma broth base CM403. The concentration of M. pneumoniae was quantified by measuring colony forming units (CFU).
Cell cultures and preparation of conditioned media
As human alveolar epithelial carcinoma A549 cells (CCL-185, ATCC) are very tolerant to SFM, we chose them as a cell model for our secretome study . Firstly, A549 cells were maintained in phenol red-free Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium Nutrient Mixture (DMEM/F12) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. When A549 cells were grown to approximately 60-70% confluence, they were washed five times with SFM to remove albumin and other elements contained in FBS. Cells were then either infected with 10 CFU/cell of M. pneumoniae in SFM or left untreated for further conditioned media (CM) collection. Cell viability in SFM was assessed by MTT test and trypan blue exclusion assay, and the cell death was assessed by apoptosis assay using the Annexin V-FITC/PI Kit (Multiscience, Hangzhou, China).
The CM was harvested 24 h after infection by centrifugation at 9,000 g for 15 min to remove floating cells and cellular debris, and filtered through a 0.22 μm filter (Chemicon, Millipore, MA, USA). After the addition of protease inhibitors (Inhibitor cocktail complete, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), the media was concentrated using the Amicon Ultra-15 (Millipore) centrifugal filter devices with a 3,000-nomina-weight limit (NMWL). The supernatants were subsequently precipitated by acetone at -20°C overnight, and harvested by centrifugation at 16,000 g for 20 min. The protein pellets were dried in air and then resuspended in an appropriate volume of reducing solution containing 6 M urea, 2 M thiourea and 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate (Sigma, St Louis, MO). The protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). 100 μg of each sample was reduced with 10 mM DTT (Sigma) at 37°C for 2.5 h, and then carbamidomethylated with 50 mM iodoacetamide (IAA) (Sigma) at room temperature in the dark for 40 min. Subsequently, digestion was performed by sequencing grade trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) using a 1:50 enzyme:protein ratio at 37°C for 20 h. After digestion, samples were lyophilized under vacuum and kept at -80°C until use. Three independent experiments were performed and samples were prepared individually for further study.
Total cell lysates from the A549 cells were prepared as previously described . Briefly, cells were washed and detached on ice in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and lysed in cell lysis buffer containing 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, 65 mM DTT, and 0.2% biolyte (Bio-Rad). The lysates were frozen and thawed with liquid nitrogen three times, and then centrifuged for 1 h at 10,000 g to remove cellular debris. The supernatant was then collected for further Western blot analysis.
All of the mass analyses were performed using a nano-LC-MS/MS system, which consisted of a nano-HPLC system (the Ettan MDLC system; GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) and a linear trap quadruple (LTQ) mass spectrometer (LTQ VELOS; Thermo Finnigan, San Jose, CA) equipped with a nano-ESI source. A RP trap column (Zorbax 300SB-C18 peptide traps, Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE) was used for desalting of samples, and a C18 reverse-phase column (150 μm i.d., 150 mm length, Column Technology Inc., Fremont, CA) was used for separation. Mobile phase A consisted of HPLC-grade water containing 0.1% formic acid (FA), and phase B consisted of 84% HPLC-grade acetonitrile (ACN) containing 0.1% FA. The analytical separation was run at a flow rate of 2 μl/min by using a linear gradient of phase B as follows: 4%-50% for 105 min, 50%-100% for 9 min and 100% for 6 min. The eluent was then introduced into the LTQ mass spectrometer with the ESI spray voltage set at 3.2 kV. For MS survey scans, each scan cycle consisted of one full MS scan, and five MS/MS events were analyzed. The LC-MS/MS analyses were repeated three times for each independent biological sample. Then the LC-MS/MS results were pooled for each biological replicates to reduce technical variation.
Data analysis and label-free quantitation
We created the peak lists from original RAW files with Bioworks Browser software (version 3.1, Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA) with the minimum peak intensity of 1000. Peptide identification was performed from each experiment with TurboSEQUEST program in the Bioworks Browser software suite by automatically searching against the nonredundant International Protein Index (IPI) human protein database (version 3.60) with decoy sequences (reverse of target database). The search parameters were set as: (a) trypsin digestion; (b) up to two missed cuts allowed; (c) cysteine carbamidomethylation as a fixed modification and methionine oxidation as a variable modification; and (d) mass tolerances set at 3.0 Da for the precursor ions and 1.0 Da for fragment ones. For protein identification, Delta Cn (≥0.1) and cross-correlation scores (Xcorr, one charge ≥1.9, two charges ≥2.2, three charges ≥3.75) were required. Only proteins identified by at least two unique peptides with good-quality tandem MS/MS data were reported. False discovery rate (FDR) was calculated by searching against a sequence-reversed decoy IPI human version 3.60 databases using the same search parameters and was estimated to be 2.0%. Multiple or ambiguous IDs were not allowed, and the decoy database hits were removed from the results. We also removed frequently observed contaminants such as porcine trypsin and human keratins.
To estimate the fold-changes in the levels of identified proteins between the experimental groups, we used DeCyder MS Differential Analysis Software (DeCyder MS, version 2.0, GE Healthcare) for comparison and label-free relative quantitation of LC-MS/MS data [52, 53]. The relative quantitation analysis consisted of two main procedures. Firstly, the PepDetect module of the software was employed for automated peptide detection, charge state assignments based on resolved isotopic peaks and consistent spacing between consecutive charge states, and quantitation based on MS signal intensities. The final step was to automatically match peptide within a mass and time tolerance window (0.5 Da and 2 min, respectively) across different signal intensity maps with PepMatch module, resulted in a quantitative comparison. The entire peptide intensity distributions detected in each sample were applied for normalization and peptides were identified by importing TurboSEQUEST search results to the PepMatch module.
Classical secretory proteins with a signal peptide were predicted by SignalP4.1 and were selected on the basis of their D-value above 0.45 . Non-classical secretory proteins without a signal peptide were predicted by SecretomP 2.0 and were selected by their neural network (NN) score≥0.5 . Simultaneously, all the identified proteins were searched against ExoCarta data to determine whether they were present in exosome fractions . The identified proteins were classified on the basis of their cellular compartment by Gene Ontology (GO) annotation . The enrichment analysis of functional annotation clustering based on cellular compartment were performed by Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) Bioinformatics Resources 6.7, with an enrichment score≥1.3 and an EASE score < 0.05 . DAVID 6.7 was also used to recognize functional Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway categories . Biological Networks Gene Ontology (BiNGO) (version 2.44), a Cytoscape plugin (version 2.8.2), was also used to determine over-representation of GO categories . Over-representation statistics were calculated by means of hypergeometric analysis followed by Benjamini & Hochberg FDR correction. Finally, Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes (STRING) 9.05 was performed to construct a network model showing protein interactions based on known and predicted protein-protein interactions .
Western blots were performed as described previously, with some modifications . Briefly, equal amounts of protein from total cell lysates or concentrated cell culture supernatants were denatured, separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore). For detection, the membranes were incubated with various primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, followed by addition of fluorescence-labeled secondary antibody (Li-COR Biosciences, diluted 1:5000) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were then scanned using the Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Bioscience). The primary antibodies utilized included rabbit polyclonal anti-ADAM9 antibody (Cell Signaling Technolgoy, Beverly, MA, USA, diluted 1:1000), rabbit polyclonal anti-Gal1 antibody (Proteintech, Chicago, IL, diluted 1:1500), rabbit polyclonal anti-MIF antibody (Proteintech, diluted 1:2000), rabbit polyclonal anti-IL33 antibody (Proteintech, diluted 1:600), rabbit polyclonal anti-SERPINE1 antibody (Proteintech, diluted 1:800), rabbit polyclonal anti-IGFBP4 antibody (Millipore, diluted 1:1000), mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY, diluted 1:3000).
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, 500 ng of the RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan), and then quantitative real-time PCR was carried out in an ABI PRISM 7900HT Real-Time PCR system using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq Kit (Takara) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The thermal cycling conditions were: 30 sec at 95°C for initial denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of 5 sec at 95°C, 30 sec at 60°C for amplification, and 15 sec at 95°C, 1 min at 60°C and 15 sec at 95°C for melting curve analysis. Target gene primers are presented in Additional file 8: Table S3, in the supplemental material. An untreated cell sample was used as the calibrator and the fold-change for this sample was set as 1. Target gene Ct values were normalized to β-actin, and the results were analyzed by means of the 2-△△Ct method .
Measurement of IL-33 cytokine by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay
Peripheral blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples of 30 pediatric patients with MPP (aged from 2.08-8.75 years old) were collected from Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine from January 2012 to December 2012. Samples from age-matched children (aged from 2.50-8.50 years old) with foreign body in bronchus were used as controls. All samples were collected with informed consent from their guardians. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. The procedure of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and BALF collection were performed as described previously . The samples were centrifuged at 2000 g for 10 min, and the supernatants were stored at -80°C until analysis. The levels of IL-33 in serum and BALF were determined using the IL-33 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Each experiment was repeated at least three times independently. Data were expressed as mean ± SD and evaluated with Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Jun Yang is a recipient of the Zhejiang Provincial for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health Talents. The work was supported by grants from the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81070004, 81000765, 81172692, 81373036); and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. LY12H2600). The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
- Waites KB, Talkington DF: Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17 (4): 697-728. 10.1128/CMR.17.4.697-728.2004. table of contentsPubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez-Vargas FM, Gomez-Duarte OG: Mycoplasma pneumoniae-an emerging extra-pulmonary pathogen. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008, 14 (2): 105-117.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sun G, Xu X, Wang Y, Shen X, Chen Z, Yang J: Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection induces reactive oxygen species and DNA damage in A549 human lung carcinoma cells. Infect Immun. 2008, 76 (10): 4405-4413. 10.1128/IAI.00575-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang J, Hooper WC, Phillips DJ, Talkington DF: Regulation of proinflammatory cytokines in human lung epithelial cells infected with Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Infect Immun. 2002, 70 (7): 3649-3655. 10.1128/IAI.70.7.3649-3655.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Christie LJ, Honarmand S, Talkington DF, Gavali SS, Preas C, Pan CY, Yagi S, Glaser CA: Pediatric encephalitis: what is the role of Mycoplasma pneumoniae?. Pediatrics. 2007, 120 (2): 305-313. 10.1542/peds.2007-0240.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ang CW, Tio-Gillen AP, Groen J, Herbrink P, Jacobs BC, van Koningsveld R, Osterhaus AD, van der Meche FG, van Doorn PA: Cross-reactive anti-galactocerebroside antibodies and Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in Guillain-Barre syndrome. J Neuroimmunol. 2002, 130 (1–2): 179-183.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kannan TR, Baseman JB: ADP-ribosylating and vacuolating cytotoxin of Mycoplasma pneumoniae represents unique virulence determinant among bacterial pathogens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006, 103 (17): 6724-6729. 10.1073/pnas.0510644103.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Covani U, Marconcini S, Giacomelli L, Sivozhelevov V, Barone A, Nicolini C: Bioinformatic prediction of leader genes in human periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2008, 79 (10): 1974-1983. 10.1902/jop.2008.080062.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirschhorn JN: Genetic approaches to studying common diseases and complex traits. Pediatr Res. 2005, 57 (5 Pt 2): 74R-77R.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lietzen N, Ohman T, Rintahaka J, Julkunen I, Aittokallio T, Matikainen S, Nyman TA: Quantitative subcellular proteome and secretome profiling of influenza A virus-infected human primary macrophages. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7 (5): e1001340-10.1371/journal.ppat.1001340.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Skalnikova H, Motlik J, Gadher SJ, Kovarova H: Mapping of the secretome of primary isolates of mammalian cells, stem cells and derived cell lines. Proteomics. 2011, 11 (4): 691-708. 10.1002/pmic.201000402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Makridakis M, Vlahou A: Secretome proteomics for discovery of cancer biomarkers. J Proteomics. 2010, 73 (12): 2291-2305. 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.07.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vu TH, Werb Z: Matrix metalloproteinases: effectors of development and normal physiology. Genes Dev. 2000, 14 (17): 2123-2133. 10.1101/gad.815400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roca-Rivada A, Al-Massadi O, Castelao C, Senin LL, Alonso J, Seoane LM, Garcia-Caballero T, Casanueva FF, Pardo M: Muscle tissue as an endocrine organ: comparative secretome profiling of slow-oxidative and fast-glycolytic rat muscle explants and its variation with exercise. J Proteomics. 2012, 75 (17): 5414-5425. 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.06.037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brown KJ, Formolo CA, Seol H, Marathi RL, Duguez S, An E, Pillai D, Nazarian J, Rood BR, Hathout Y: Advances in the proteomic investigation of the cell secretome. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2012, 9 (3): 337-345. 10.1586/epr.12.21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsuzawa Y: Therapy Insight: adipocytokines in metabolic syndrome and related cardiovascular disease. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2006, 3 (1): 35-42. 10.1038/ncpcardio0380.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mason GM, Poole E, Sissons JG, Wills MR, Sinclair JH: Human cytomegalovirus latency alters the cellular secretome, inducing cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ T-cell migration and suppression of effector function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012, 109 (36): 14538-14543. 10.1073/pnas.1204836109.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miettinen JJ, Matikainen S, Nyman TA: Global secretome characterization of herpes simplex virus 1-infected human primary macrophages. J Virol. 2012, 86 (23): 12770-12778. 10.1128/JVI.01545-12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schleimer RP, Kato A, Kern R, Kuperman D, Avila PC: Epithelium: at the interface of innate and adaptive immune responses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007, 120 (6): 1279-1284. 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.046.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chmura K, Lutz RD, Chiba H, Numata MS, Choi HJ, Fantuzzi G, Voelker DR, Chan ED: Mycoplasma pneumoniae antigens stimulate interleukin-8. Chest. 2003, 123 (3 Suppl): 425S-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Razin S: Adherence of pathogenic mycoplasmas to host cells. Biosci Rep. 1999, 19 (5): 367-372. 10.1023/A:1020204020545.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mathivanan S, Fahner CJ, Reid GE, Simpson RJ: ExoCarta 2012: database of exosomal proteins, RNA and lipids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (Database issue): D1241-D1244.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bianchi ME: DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger. J Leukoc Biol. 2007, 81 (1): 1-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gallucci S, Matzinger P: Danger signals: SOS to the immune system. Curr Opin Immunol. 2001, 13 (1): 114-119. 10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00191-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yang H, Yu LR, Yi M, Lucas DA, Lukes L, Lancaster M, Chan KC, Issaq HJ, Stephens RM, Conrads TP, et al.: Parallel analysis of transcript and translation profiles: identification of metastasis-related signal pathways differentially regulated by drug and genetic modifications. J Proteome Res. 2006, 5 (7): 1555-1567. 10.1021/pr0504283.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Minguez P, Doerks T, Stark M, Muller J, Bork P, et al.: The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39 (Database issue): D561-D568.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petricoin EF, Zoon KC, Kohn EC, Barrett JC, Liotta LA: Clinical proteomics: translating benchside promise into bedside reality. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2002, 1 (9): 683-695. 10.1038/nrd891.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brioschi M, Lento S, Tremoli E, Banfi C: Proteomic analysis of endothelial cell secretome: a means of studying the pleiotropic effects of Hmg-CoA reductase inhibitors. J Proteomics. 2013, 78: 346-361.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nickel W: The mystery of nonclassical protein secretion. A current view on cargo proteins and potential export routes. Eur J Biochem. 2003, 270 (10): 2109-2119. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03577.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Record M, Subra C, Silvente-Poirot S, Poirot M: Exosomes as intercellular signalosomes and pharmacological effectors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011, 81 (10): 1171-1182. 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.02.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardy RD, Coalson JJ, Peters J, Chaparro A, Techasaensiri C, Cantwell AM, Kannan TR, Baseman JB, Dube PH: Analysis of pulmonary inflammation and function in the mouse and baboon after exposure to Mycoplasma pneumoniae CARDS toxin. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (10): e7562-10.1371/journal.pone.0007562.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fonseca-Aten M, Rios AM, Mejias A, Chavez-Bueno S, Katz K, Gomez AM, McCracken GH, Hardy RD: Mycoplasma pneumoniae induces host-dependent pulmonary inflammation and airway obstruction in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005, 32 (3): 201-210. 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0197OC.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardy RD, Jafri HS, Olsen K, Hatfield J, Iglehart J, Rogers BB, Patel P, Cassell G, McCracken GH, Ramilo O: Mycoplasma pneumoniae induces chronic respiratory infection, airway hyperreactivity, and pulmonary inflammation: a murine model of infection-associated chronic reactive airway disease. Infect Immun. 2002, 70 (2): 649-654. 10.1128/IAI.70.2.649-654.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardy RD, Jafri HS, Olsen K, Wordemann M, Hatfield J, Rogers BB, Patel P, Duffy L, Cassell G, McCracken GH, et al.: Elevated cytokine and chemokine levels and prolonged pulmonary airflow resistance in a murine Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia model: a microbiologic, histologic, immunologic, and respiratory plethysmographic profile. Infect Immun. 2001, 69 (6): 3869-3876. 10.1128/IAI.69.6.3869-3876.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu Y, Sun G, Liu G, Wang Y, Shao Z, Chen Z, Yang J: Effects of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection on sphingolipid metabolism in human lung carcinoma A549 cells. Microb Pathog. 2009, 46 (2): 63-72. 10.1016/j.micpath.2008.10.014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kono H, Rock KL: How dying cells alert the immune system to danger. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008, 8 (4): 279-289. 10.1038/nri2215.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- To M, Takagi D, Akashi K, Kano I, Haruki K, Barnes PJ, Ito K: Sputum PAI-1 elevation by oxidative stress-dependent NF-kappaB activation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 2013, 144 (2): 515-521. 10.1378/chest.12-2381.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sung SY, Kubo H, Shigemura K, Arnold RS, Logani S, Wang R, Konaka H, Nakagawa M, Mousses S, Amin M, et al.: Oxidative stress induces ADAM9 protein expression in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66 (19): 9519-9526. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4375.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ito K, Scott SA, Cutler S, Dong LF, Neuzil J, Blanchard H, Ralph SJ: Thiodigalactoside inhibits murine cancers by concurrently blocking effects of galectin-1 on immune dysregulation, angiogenesis and protection against oxidative stress. Angiogenesis. 2011, 14 (3): 293-307. 10.1007/s10456-011-9213-5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kariya C, Chu HW, Huang J, Leitner H, Martin RJ, Day BJ: Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection and environmental tobacco smoke inhibit lung glutathione adaptive responses and increase oxidative stress. Infect Immun. 2008, 76 (10): 4455-4462. 10.1128/IAI.00136-08.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Almagor M, Kahane I, Yatziv S: Role of superoxide anion in host cell injury induced by mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. A study in normal and trisomy 21 cells. J Clin Invest. 1984, 73 (3): 842-847. 10.1172/JCI111279.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Radisky DC: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Cell Sci. 2005, 118 (Pt 19): 4325-4326.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Itoh T, Hayashi Y, Kanamaru T, Morita Y, Suzuki S, Wang W, Zhou L, Rui JA, Yamamoto M, Kuroda Y, et al.: Clinical significance of urokinase-type plasminogen activator activity in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000, 15 (4): 422-430. 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2000.02150.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seals DF, Courtneidge SA: The ADAMs family of metalloproteases: multidomain proteins with multiple functions. Genes Dev. 2003, 17 (1): 7-30. 10.1101/gad.1039703.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cedeno-Laurent F, Dimitroff CJ: Galectin-1 research in T cell immunity: past, present and future. Clin Immunol. 2012, 142 (2): 107-116. 10.1016/j.clim.2011.09.011.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oboki K, Ohno T, Kajiwara N, Arae K, Morita H, Ishii A, Nambu A, Abe T, Kiyonari H, Matsumoto K, et al.: IL-33 is a crucial amplifier of innate rather than acquired immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010, 107 (43): 18581-18586. 10.1073/pnas.1003059107.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bonilla WV, Frohlich A, Senn K, Kallert S, Fernandez M, Johnson S, Kreutzfeldt M, Hegazy AN, Schrick C, Fallon PG, et al.: The alarmin interleukin-33 drives protective antiviral CD8(+) T cell responses. Science. 2012, 335 (6071): 984-989. 10.1126/science.1215418.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller AM: Role of IL-33 in inflammation and disease. J Inflamm (Lond). 2011, 8 (1): 22-10.1186/1476-9255-8-22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Humphreys NE, Xu D, Hepworth MR, Liew FY, Grencis RK: IL-33, a potent inducer of adaptive immunity to intestinal nematodes. J Immunol. 2008, 180 (4): 2443-2449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmitz J, Owyang A, Oldham E, Song Y, Murphy E, McClanahan TK, Zurawski G, Moshrefi M, Qin J, Li X, et al.: IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines. Immunity. 2005, 23 (5): 479-490. 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.09.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cherry WB, Yoon J, Bartemes KR, Iijima K, Kita H: A novel IL-1 family cytokine, IL-33, potently activates human eosinophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008, 121 (6): 1484-1490. 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaplan A, Soderstrom M, Fenyo D, Nilsson A, Falth M, Skold K, Svensson M, Pettersen H, Lindqvist S, Svenningsson P, et al.: An automated method for scanning LC-MS data sets for significant peptides and proteins, including quantitative profiling and interactive confirmation. J Proteome Res. 2007, 6 (7): 2888-2895. 10.1021/pr060676e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Johansson C, Samskog J, Sundstrom L, Wadensten H, Bjorkesten L, Flensburg J: Differential expression analysis of Escherichia coli proteins using a novel software for relative quantitation of LC-MS/MS data. Proteomics. 2006, 6 (16): 4475-4485. 10.1002/pmic.200500921.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H: SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011, 8 (10): 785-786. 10.1038/nmeth.1701.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bendtsen JD, Jensen LJ, Blom N, von Heijne G, Brunak S: Feature-based prediction of non-classical and leaderless protein secretion. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2004, 17 (4): 349-356. 10.1093/protein/gzh037.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrell D, Dimmer E, Huntley RP, Binns D, O’Donovan C, Apweiler R: The GOA database in 2009–an integrated gene ontology annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37 (Database issue): D396-D403.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA: Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009, 4 (1): 44-57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M: The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32 (Database issue): D277-D280.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Maere S, Heymans K, Kuiper M: BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of gene ontology categories in biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (16): 3448-3449. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti551.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25 (4): 402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tang LF, Shi YC, Xu YC, Wang CF, Yu ZS, Chen ZM: The change of asthma-associated immunological parameters in children with Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. J Asthma. 2009, 46 (3): 265-269. 10.1080/02770900802647557.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.