- Research article
- Open Access
Disclosure of the differences of Mesorhizobium loti under the free-living and symbiotic conditions by comparative proteome analysis without bacteroid isolation
© Tatsukami et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 21 March 2013
Accepted: 26 July 2013
Published: 31 July 2013
Rhizobia are symbiotic nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria that show a symbiotic relationship with their host legume. Rhizobia have 2 different physiological conditions: a free-living condition in soil, and a symbiotic nitrogen-fixing condition in the nodule. The lifestyle of rhizobia remains largely unknown, although genome and transcriptome analyses have been carried out. To clarify the lifestyle of bacteria, proteome analysis is necessary because the protein profile directly reflects in vivo reactions of the organisms. In proteome analysis, high separation performance is required to analyze complex biological samples. Therefore, we used a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry system, equipped with a long monolithic silica capillary column, which is superior to conventional columns. In this study, we compared the protein profile of Mesorhizobium loti MAFF303099 under free-living condition to that of symbiotic conditions by using small amounts of crude extracts.
We identified 1,533 and 847 proteins for M. loti under free-living and symbiotic conditions, respectively. Pathway analysis by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) revealed that many of the enzymes involved in the central carbon metabolic pathway were commonly detected under both conditions. The proteins encoded in the symbiosis island, the transmissible chromosomal region that includes the genes that are highly upregulated under the symbiotic condition, were uniquely detected under the symbiotic condition. The features of the symbiotic condition that have been reported by transcriptome analysis were confirmed at the protein level by proteome analysis. In addition, the genes of the proteins involved in cell surface structure were repressed under the symbiotic nitrogen-fixing condition. Furthermore, farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) was found to be biosynthesized only in rhizobia under the symbiotic condition.
The obtained protein profile appeared to reflect the difference in phenotypes under the free-living and symbiotic conditions. In addition, KEGG pathway analysis revealed that the cell surface structure of rhizobia was largely different under each condition, and surprisingly, rhizobia might provided FPP to the host as a source of secondary metabolism. M. loti changed its metabolism and cell surface structure in accordance with the surrounding conditions.
Rhizobia are nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria that show intracellular symbiosis with their host legume. This symbiotic interaction has become a model system to identify and characterize the attractive mechanism employed by invasive bacteria during chronic host interactions . This symbiosis begins with the secretion of flavonoids by the legume. Subsequently, nod genes of rhizobia are activated, and Nod factors (i.e. lipopolysaccharides; LPS) are secreted by rhizobia as signals . After signal exchange between host and symbiont, rhizobia infect the host legume, escaping the vegetative defense responses. The host then produces nodules to maintain symbionts and endocytically incorporates rhizobia into the nodules . In a legume nodule, the host provides C4 dicarboxylates to symbiotic rhizobia as the carbon source; rhizobia fix atmospheric nitrogen and provide ammonia to the host as a nitrogen source in return . Thus, the host plants are able to overcome their nitrogen deficiency.
Lotus japonicus and Mesorhizobium loti are model organisms of legume-rhizobia symbiosis. The entire genome structures of L. japonicus MG-20 and M. loti MAFF303099 have been reported previously [5, 6], and the database is maintained by the Kazusa DNA Research Institute (Rhizobase; http://genome.microbedb.jp/rhizobase). Transcriptome analysis of M. loti by DNA microarray revealed that most of the transposase genes and nif, fix, fdx, and rpoN on the symbiosis island were highly upregulated under the symbiotic condition, while genes for cell wall synthesis, cell division, DNA replication, and flagella formation were strongly repressed under the symbiotic condition . However, less information is available about M. loti than about other genera of rhizobia, such as Sinorhizobium meliloti, Rhizobium leguminosarum, and Bradyrhizobium japonicum.
In addition to transcriptome analysis, proteome analysis has recently attracted much attention. While genome sequencing has provided a considerable amount of useful information to clarify biological phenomena, proteins, rather than genes, actually function in vivo. Thus, it is necessary to analyze the entire set of produced proteins . Proteome analysis of M. loti in mid-growth phase has been reported , but it has not been performed for the symbiotic phase. Proteome analyses of other rhizobia, such as B. japonicum[10–14], and S. meliloti[15–20], have been previously reported. They employed 2-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE)-based analysis combined with matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-MS), but time-consuming steps, such as gel spot isolation and individual measurement, are necessary in this method. In addition, previous 2D-PAGE-based analyses have only identified up to 500 proteins . Another report employed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based technology combined with prefractionation, such as multidimensional chromatography  or gel-based separation , but these prefractionation steps decreased throughput. Furthermore, all of them included a complicated isolation step of the bacteroid (a symbiotic form of rhizobia) from the nodule, and the step required a large amount of biological samples, such as 1–5 g nodules collected from approximately 40 plants . Detection of small amount of proteins present in complex biological samples remains difficult and requires a combination of prefractionation steps.
To solve the problems, we used a nanoLC-MS/MS system equipped with a long monolithic silica capillary column (200 cm long, 0.1 mm ID). Monolithic silica materials offer high separation efficiency in long column formats because of their high permeability , and they have been successfully applied to separate tryptic fragments in highly complex samples with a shallow gradient. As this high-resolution system does not require any additional prefractionation prior to the separation and detection step by LC-MS/MS, this approach can simplify the workflow of shotgun proteomics and minimize the sample amount, as well as total analysis time . Using this system, we have successfully performed proteome analysis of Candida albicans and Clostridium cellulovorans.
Here, we report the first comparative proteome analysis of M. loti under the free-living and symbiotic conditions by using our system. Our data should accelerate functional and comprehensive studies focused on molecular mechanisms of L. japonicus - M. loti symbiosis.
Results and discussion
Identification of proteins extracted from free-living and symbiotic M. loti
KEGG pathway analysis
The number of classified enzymes detected by proteome analysis
Central carbon metabolism
Nucleotide sugar metabolism
Central carbon metabolism
Farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) biosynthesis
It is generally known that rhizobia provide ammonia and other amino acids as a nitrogen source to the host , while no other compound is known to be provided. However, the obtained protein profile suggested that FPP might be provided from rhizobia to plant root cells. In the quinone biosynthetic pathway, the enzymes necessary to FPP biosynthesis, such as isopentenyl pyrophosphate isomerase (mlr6371) and geranyltransferase (mlr6368), which are located in the rhizobia symbiosis island, were uniquely detected under the symbiotic condition (Figure 4b). These enzymes produce FPP from isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethyl allyl diphosphate. FPP is an intermediate in the mevalonate pathway, which is present in all higher eukaryotes and many bacteria. FPP is used for the biosynthesis of ubiquinone in M. loti. However, the enzymes which catalyze the ubiquinone biosynthesis reactions from FPP (shown in asterisks in Figure 4b) were not detected at the protein level. Additionally, the symbiosis island does not include genes encoding octaprenyl-diphosphate synthase (mlr7426) and 4-hydroxybenzoate polyprenyltransferase (mll7442), which are involved in the pathway of ubiquinone biosynthesis. On the other hand, higher plants utilize FPP as the intermediate precursor of many secondary metabolites, such as sesquiterpenes, triterpenes, and sterols . It is reasonable to suppose that FPP is provided to the host legume from rhizobia as a source of secondary metabolites because FPP was synthesized only under the symbiotic condition, as the enzymes that metabolize FPP after its production were not detected in M. loti at the protein level. However, the estimation is just based on the obtained protein profile, and further investigation of the migration of FPP will be carried out by using deletion mutants, and by analysis at mRNA and metabolite levels.
Nucleotide sugar metabolism and peptidoglycan biosynthesis
On the other hand, the enzymes involved in uridine diphosphate (UDP) sugar metabolism were not produced under the symbiotic condition (Figure 4c), and LPS transporters (mll3197, mll7564, mll7866) were not produced under the symbiotic condition. UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-MurNAc) is the starting material for LPS biosynthesis. LPS is known as one of the “nod factors,” which is secreted by the rhizobial body when it perceives the root through the flavonoid groups secreted from host legume . The secretion of LPS is likely unnecessary under the symbiotic condition (after infection). In addition, UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid, the end product of this pathway, is the starting material of peptidoglycan biosynthesis. The enzymes of peptidoglycan biosynthesis were uniquely detected under the free-living condition (Figure 4d).
Under the symbiotic condition, rhizobia are differentiated into a bacteroid, and the peribacteroid membrane (PBM)-enclosed bacteroids are essentially a nitrogen-fixing intracellular organelle, termed the ‘symbiosome.’ In PBM, bacteroids are stationary and become slightly larger than the free-living rhizobia . However, the remarkable structural changes have not been confirmed at the protein level. Proteome data could detect the proteins involved in the structural changes, as well as changes in metabolic pathway; thus, we focused on cell surface structure.
From our data, it was predicted that peptidoglycan was not biosynthesized under the symbiotic condition described above (Figure 4d). Peptidoglycan, which is the main material of bacterial cell wall, plays an important role in the maintenance of structure by providing tolerance to osmotic pressure and mechanical stress, and it is also involved in cell division during growth . The inactivation of the peptidoglycan biosynthetic pathway under the symbiotic condition is supported by the following: (1) the neogenesis of peptidoglycan is unnecessary because fully symbiotic rhizobia cease their cell division, (2) symbiotic rhizobia are able to avoid mechanical stress because of enclosure by PBM and immobility, and (3) the host legume might control the surrounding environment not to impose an osmotic stress on rhizobia. The protein profile indicates that the interruption of peptidoglycan biosynthesis in symbiotic M. loti occurs at the protein level, and rhizobia under the symbiotic condition might lose its cell wall.
Flagellum and pilus components
We investigated structural proteins, such as flagellum and pilus components. The flagellum is connected to bacterial motility and attachment of rhizobia to developing root hairs, which is one of the first steps of nitrogen-fixing root nodule symbiosis . The pilus is a hair-like appendage found on the surface of many bacteria and is related to the process of bacterial conjugation. Rhizobia have not only conjugative pili but also type IV pili, which generate motile forces called twitching motility, in which the pilus works as a grappling hook to bind to a variety of surfaces . The flagellum component proteins, FlaA (mlr2925, mlr2927), FlgL (mlr2939), FlgK (mlr2938), MotB (mlr3926), and FliN (mll2902), were detected only under the free-living condition. DNA microarray analysis has shown that the gene of flagellar L-ling protein (FlgH; mll2921) is repressed at the mRNA level . Therefore, the obtained protein profile confirmed that under the symbiotic condition, rhizobia repress flagellum genes, and it also indicated that structural proteins of the flagellum are not present under the symbiotic condition. In addition, the pilus assembly proteins, CpaB (mll5595), CpaD (mll5598), and CpaE (mll5600), were also detected only under the free-living condition. Flagella and pili were lost under the symbiotic condition because rhizobia under the symbiotic condition would have no need for conjugation, infection, and motility in PBM. In contrast, rhizobia under the free-living condition require the flagellum and pilus component proteins.
Strains and growth conditions
M. loti MAFF303099 was cultured in tryptone-yeast extract (TY) medium  at 28°C. Cells were harvested in the early stationary phase for 72 h. Cells were subjected to sample preparation in the free-living condition.
For the symbiotic condition, L. japonicus MG-20 Miyakojima  seeds were sterilized, germinated, and inoculated with M. loti and grown in MM1  medium at 25°C with a 16-h light/8-h dark cycle. Root nodules from several plants were harvested at 7 weeks post-inoculation. Nodules from 3 independently grown pools of plants were collected and processed in parallel.
Nodules were frozen with liquid nitrogen, homogenized with an ice-cold mortar, and subjected to sample preparation.
Collected cells were resuspended with 500 μL of lysis buffer (2% (w/v) 3-(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio-1-propanesulfonate, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1% (v/v) protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 7 M urea, and 2 M thiourea in 50 mM Tris–HCl (Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan)). The solution was mixed with an equal volume of 0.5-mm glass beads (Tomy Seiko, Tokyo, Japan). The cells were then disrupted mechanically in triplicate by using BeadSmash 12 (Wakenyaku, Kyoto, Japan) at 4°C, 4,000 × g for 1 min. The solution was centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected. The supernatant was filtered by 0.45 μm Ultrafree-MC (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The filtered solution was subjected to ultrafiltration using Amicon Ultra YM-10 (Millipore) and buffer-exchanged by 200 mM triethyl ammonium bicarbonate (TEAB; Sigma-Aldrich). The proteins were reduced by adding 10 mM tris-(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and incubated at 55°C for 1 h. After the reaction, 20 mM iodoacetamide was added to the solution, and incubated for 30 min. The reactant was mixed with 1 mL of ice-cold acetone and incubated at −20°C for 3 h to precipitate proteins. The precipitated proteins were resuspended with 100 μL of 200 mM TEAB and mixed with 2 μl (1 μg μL-1) of sequencing grade modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at 37°C overnight. The peptide concentration of the tryptic digests was measured using Protein Assay Bicinchoninate Kit (Nacalai tesque). The concentrations of the injected digests were 1.06 ± 0.12 μg μL-1 digest for free-living M. loti and 4.96 ± 0.90 μg μL-1 digest for nodules, respectively. (mean ± SD, N = 3).
Proteome analyses were performed by a liquid chromatography (UltiMate3000 RSLCnano system (Thermo Fisher Scientific))/mass spectrometry (LTQ Velos mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific)) system equipped with a long monolithic silica capillary column (200-cm long, 0.1-mm ID) [24, 27]. 10 and 5 μL of tryptic digests were injected for free-living and symbiotic conditions, respectively, and separated by reversed-phase chromatography at a flow rate of 500 nL min-1. The gradient was provided by changing the mixing ratio of the 2 eluents: A, 0.1% (v/v) formic acid and B, 80% (v/v) acetonitrile containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid. The gradient was started with 5% B, increased to 50% B for 600 min, further increased to 95% B to wash the column, then returned to the initial condition, and held for re-equilibration. The separated analytes were detected on a mass spectrometer with a full scan range of 350–1,500 m/z. For data-dependent acquisition, the method was set to automatically analyze the top 5 most intense ions observed in the MS scan. An ESI voltage of 2.4 kV was applied directly to the LC buffer end of the chromatography column by using a MicroTee (Upchurch Scientific, Oak Harbor, WA, USA). The ion transfer tube temperature was set to 300°C. Triplicate analyses were done for each sample of 3 biological replicates, and blank runs were inserted between different samples.
The mass spectrometry data of each sample were used for protein identification using MASCOT (Matrix Science, London, UK), working on Proteome Discoverer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) against the database at Rhizobase containing 7,283 sequences with a peptide tolerance of 1.2 Da, MS/MS tolerance of 0.8 Da, and maximum number of missed cleavages of 2. For trypsin digestion, cysteine carbamidomethylation (+57.021 Da) and methionine oxidation (+15.995 Da) were set as a variable modification. The data were then filtered at a q-value ≤ 0.01 corresponding to 1% false discovery rate on a spectral level. Moreover, proteins identified by at least 2 peptides per protein or identified by a single peptide per protein at any 3 data points were accepted as ‘identified proteins.’
The pathway analysis of identified proteins is performed by using the pathway mapping tool on KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/). The functional classification of proteins was performed by using Rhizobase at Kazusa DNA Research Institute (http://www.kazusa.or.jp/e/index.html).
We thank the National BioResource Project (Legume Base), Japan, for kindly providing Lotus japonicus seed. We also thank the National Institute of Technology and Evaluation, Japan, for kindly providing Mesorhizobium loti.
- Gibson KE, Kobayashi H, Walker GC: Molecular determinants of a symbiotic chronic infection. Annu Rev Genet. 2008, 42: 413-441. 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091427.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Denarie J, Debelle F, Prome JC: Rhizobium lipo-chitooligosaccharide nodulation factors: Signaling molecules mediating recognition and morphogenesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 1996, 65: 503-535. 10.1146/annurev.bi.65.070196.002443.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Oldroyd GE, Downie JA: Coordinating nodule morphogenesis with rhizobial infection in legumes. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008, 59: 519-546. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092839.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prell J, Poole P: Metabolic changes of rhizobia in legume nodules. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14: 161-168. 10.1016/j.tim.2006.02.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaneko T, Nakamura Y, Sato S, Asamizu E, Kato T, Sasamoto S, Watanabe A, Idesawa K, Ishikawa A, Kawashima K, Kimura T, Kishida Y, Kiyokawa C, Kohara M, Matsumoto M, Matsuno A, Mochizuki Y, Nakayama S, Nakazaki N, Shimpo S, Sugimoto M, Takeuchi C, Yamada M, Tabata S: Complete genome structure of the nitrogen-fixing symbiotic bacterium Mesorhizobium loti. DNA Res. 2000, 7: 381-406. 10.1093/dnares/7.6.381.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sato S, Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Asamizu E, Kato T, Nakao M, Sasamoto S, Watanabe A, Ono A, Kawashima K, Fujishiro T, Katoh M, Kohara M, Kishida Y, Minami C, Nakayama S, Nakazaki N, Shimizu Y, Shimpo S, Takahashi C, Wada T, Yamada M, Ohmido N, Hayashi M, Fukui K, Baba T, Nakamichi T, Mori H, Tabata S: Genome structure of the legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res. 2008, 15: 227-239. 10.1093/dnares/dsn008.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uchiumi T, Ohwada T, Itakura M, Mitsui H, Nukui N, Dawadi P, Kaneko T, Tabata S, Yokoyama T, Tejima K, Saeki K, Omori H, Hayashi M, Maekawa T, Sriprang R, Murooka Y, Tajima S, Simomura K, Nomura M, Suzuki A, Shimoda Y, Sioya K, Abe M, Minamisawa K: Expression islands clustered on the symbiosis island of the Mesorhizobium loti genome. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 2439-2448. 10.1128/JB.186.8.2439-2448.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tyers M, Mann M: From genomics to proteomics. Nature. 2003, 422: 193-197. 10.1038/nature01510.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kajiwara H, Kaneko T, Ishizaka M, Tajima S, Kouchi H: Protein profile of symbiotic bacteria Mesorhizobium loti MAFF303099 in mid-growth phase. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2003, 67: 2668-2673. 10.1271/bbb.67.2668.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hempel J, Zehner S, Gottfert M, Patschkowski T: Analysis of the secretome of the soybean symbiont Bradyrhizobium japonicum. J Biotechnol. 2009, 140: 51-58. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.11.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sarma AD, Emerich DW: A comparative proteomic evaluation of culture grown vs nodule isolated Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Proteomics. 2006, 6: 3008-3028. 10.1002/pmic.200500783.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nomura M, Arunothayanan H, Dao TV, Le HTP, Kaneko T, Sato S, Tabata S, Tajima S: Differential protein profiles of Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110 bacteroid during soybean nodule development. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2010, 56: 579-590. 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2010.00500.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sarma AD, Emerich DW: Global protein expression pattern of Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroids: a prelude to functional proteomics. Proteomics. 2005, 5: 4170-4184. 10.1002/pmic.200401296.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Delmotte N, Ahrens CH, Knief C, Qeli E, Koch M, Fischer HM, Vorholt JA, Hennecke H, Pessi G: An integrated proteomics and transcriptomics reference data set provides new insights into the Bradyrhizobium japonicum bacteroid metabolism in soybean root nodules. Proteomics. 2010, 10: 1391-1400. 10.1002/pmic.200900710.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chen H, Teplitski M, Robinson JB, Rolfe BG, Bauer WD: Proteomic analysis of wild-type Sinorhizobium meliloti responses to N-acyl homoserine lactone quorum-sensing signals and the transition to stationary phase. J Bacteriol. 2003, 185: 5029-5036. 10.1128/JB.185.17.5029-5036.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Torres-Quesada O, Oruezabal RI, Peregrina A, Jofre E, Lloret J, Rivilla R, Toro N, Jimenez-Zurdo JI: The Sinorhizobium meliloti RNA chaperone Hfq influences central carbon metabolism and the symbiotic interaction with alfalfa. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10: 71-90. 10.1186/1471-2180-10-71.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Djordjevic MA: Sinorhizobium meliloti metabolism in the root nodule: a proteomic perspective. Proteomics. 2004, 4: 1859-1872. 10.1002/pmic.200300802.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barra-Bily L, Fontenelle C, Jan G, Flechard M, Trautwetter A, Pandey SP, Walker GC, Blanco C: Proteomic alterations explain phenotypic changes in Sinorhizobium meliloti lacking the RNA chaperone Hfq. J Bacteriol. 2010, 192: 1719-1729. 10.1128/JB.01429-09.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao MS, Chen HC, Eberhard A, Gronquist MR, Robinson JB, Connolly M, Teplitski M, Rolfe BG, Bauer WD: Effects of AiiA-mediated quorum quenching in Sinorhizobium meliloti on quorum-sensing signals, proteome patterns, and symbiotic interactions. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007, 20: 843-856. 10.1094/MPMI-20-7-0843.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao MS, Chen HC, Eberhard A, Gronquist MR, Robinson JB, Rolfe BG, Bauer WD: sinI- and expR-dependent quorum sensing in Sinorhizobium meliloti. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187: 7931-7944. 10.1128/JB.187.23.7931-7944.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larrainzar E, Wienkoop S, Weckwerth W, Ladrera R, Arrese-Igor C, Gonzalez EM: Medicago truncatula root nodule proteome analysis reveals differential plant and bacteroid responses to drought stress. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144: 1495-1507. 10.1104/pp.107.101618.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Knief C, Delmotte N, Vorholt JA: Bacterial adaptation to life in association with plants - A proteomic perspective from culture to in situ conditions. Proteomics. 2011, 11: 3086-3105. 10.1002/pmic.201000818.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Koch M, Delmotte N, Rehrauer H, Vorholt JA, Pessi G, Hennecke H: Rhizobial adaptation to hosts, a new facet in the legume root-nodule symbiosis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23: 784-790. 10.1094/MPMI-23-6-0784.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Motokawa M, Kobayashi H, Ishizuka N, Minakuchi H, Nakanishi K, Jinnai H, Hosoya K, Ikegami T, Tanaka N: Monolithic silica columns with various skeleton sizes and through-pore sizes for capillary liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2002, 961: 53-63. 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00133-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iwasaki M, Miwa S, Ikegami T, Tomita M, Tanaka N, Ishihama Y: One-dimensional capillary liquid chromatographic separation coupled with tandem mass spectrometry unveils the Escherichia coli proteome on a microarray scale. Anal Chem. 2010, 82: 2616-2620. 10.1021/ac100343q.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aoki W, Ueda T, Tatsukami Y, Kitahara N, Morisaka H, Kuroda K, Ueda M: Time-course proteomic profile of Candida albicans during adaptation to a fetal serum. Pathog Dis. 2013, 67: 67-75. 10.1111/2049-632X.12003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morisaka H, Matsui K, Tatsukami Y, Kuroda K, Miyake H, Tamaru Y, Ueda M: Profile of native cellulosomal proteins of Clostridium cellulovorans adapted to various carbon sources. AMB Express. 2012, 2: 37-41. 10.1186/2191-0855-2-37.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Masson-Boivin C, Giraud E, Perret X, Batut J: Establishing nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with legumes: how many rhizobium recipes?. Trends Microbiol. 2009, 17: 458-466. 10.1016/j.tim.2009.07.004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shingler V: Signal sensory systems that impact Sigma 54-dependent transcription. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011, 35: 425-440. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2010.00255.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McGarvey DJ, Croteau R: Terpenoid metabolism. Plant Cell. 1995, 7: 1015-1026.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kouchi H, Imaizumi-Anraku H, Hayashi M, Hakoyama T, Nakagawa T, Umehara Y, Suganuma N, Kawaguchi M: How many peas in a pod? Legume genes responsible for mutualistic symbioses underground. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51: 1381-1397. 10.1093/pcp/pcq107.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Young KD: Bacterial shape. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 49: 571-580.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Smit G, Kijne JW, Lugtenberg BJ: Roles of flagella, lipopolysaccharide, and a Ca2+−dependent cell surface protein in attachment of Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar viciae to pea root hair tips. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171: 569-572.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mattick JS: Type IV pili and twitching motility. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002, 56: 289-314. 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160938.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Beringer JE: R factor transfer in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J Gen Microbiol. 1974, 84: 188-198. 10.1099/00221287-84-1-188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawaguchi M: Lotus japonicus 'Miyakojima' MG-20: An early-flowering accession suitable for indoor handling. J Plant Res. 2000, 113: 507-509. 10.1007/PL00013961.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Becard G, Fortin JA: Early events of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhiza formation on Ri T-DNA transformed roots. New Phytolog. 1988, 108: 211-218. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1988.tb03698.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.