We describe the diversity of two kinds of mycobacteria isolates, environmental mycobacteria and Mycobacterium bovis collected from wild boar, fallow deer, red deer and cattle in Doñana National Park (DNP, Spain), analyzing their association with temporal, spatial and environmental factors.
Results
High diversity of environmental mycobacteria species and M. bovis typing patterns (TPs) were found. When assessing the factors underlying the presence of the most common types of both environmental mycobacteria and M. bovis TPs in DNP, we evidenced (i) host species differences in the occurrence, (ii) spatial structuration and (iii) differences in the degree of spatial association of specific types between host species. Co-infection of a single host by two M. bovis TPs occurred in all three wild ungulate species. In wild boar and red deer, isolation of one group of mycobacteria occurred more frequently in individuals not infected by the other group. While only three TPs were detected in wildlife between 1998 and 2003, up to 8 different ones were found during 2006-2007. The opposite was observed in cattle. Belonging to an M. bovis-infected social group was a significant risk factor for mycobacterial infection in red deer and wild boar, but not for fallow deer. M. bovis TPs were usually found closer to water marshland than MOTT.
Conclusions
The diversity of mycobacteria described herein is indicative of multiple introduction events and a complex multi-host and multi-pathogen epidemiology in DNP. Significant changes in the mycobacterial isolate community may have taken place, even in a short time period (1998 to 2007). Aspects of host social organization should be taken into account in wildlife epidemiology. Wildlife in DNP is frequently exposed to different species of non-tuberculous, environmental mycobacteria, which could interact with the immune response to pathogenic mycobacteria, although the effects are unknown. This research highlights the suitability of molecular typing for surveys at small spatial and temporal scales.
Background
Identifying mechanisms of pathogen transmission, including potential environmental sources, is critical to control disease [1]. Molecular epidemiology integrates conventional epidemiological approaches with molecular techniques to track specific strains of pathogens in order to understand the distribution of pathogens in populations and environments [2]. This can be used to elucidate inter- and intra-specific transmission pathways and environmental risk factors, from individual to population, and from local to broader spatial scales.
The genus Mycobacterium comprises over 70 species and several subspecies. Over 30 of these can cause disease in livestock, wildlife and humans, occurring worldwide. Mycobacterial diseases such as bovine tuberculosis (bTB) have become a major sanitary and conservation problem even in relatively unmanaged natural areas across the world. Similar to other shared diseases, the existence of wildlife reservoirs is limiting the effectiveness of eradication schemes in livestock [3, 4]. In bTB, known risk factors for wild ungulates include age, gender, density, spatial aggregation, intra and inter-specific contact, fencing and other habitat features as well as genetic factors [5–12]. However, most data derive from large scale studies [e. g. [3, 13–18]], while detailed information at small spatial scales is still very scarce (in ungulates [19–24], in possums Trichosurus vulpecula [25, 26]), and usually, fine associations with spatial and environmental factors are not addressed.
Even less information is available regarding the effects on wildlife and livestock of Mycobacteria Other Than Tuberculosis (MOTT). Environmental mycobacteria or MOTT include a large number of species that can cause serious illnesses in humans, particularly in immunocompromised patients [27]. For example, Mycobacterium interjectum has been identified as a causative agent of cervical lymphadenitis in children [28], and of cutaneous infections in immunosuppressed patients [29]. M. xenopi may cause pulmonary disease in humans [30], and M. scrofulaceum may cause cutaneous infections and lymphadenitis [27]. In humans, risk factors for MOTT infections include immunosuppression, contaminated water and aerosol exposure, and short or old age [27–29]. MOTT are widely distributed in the environment, particularly in wet soil, marshland, streams, rivers and estuaries, but each species shows different preferences [31].
Because of its habitat characteristics, extension and their sizeable wild and domestic animal populations, Doñana National Park (DNP) in Southern Spain has been proposed as a good natural laboratory for studying wildlife mycobacteriosis [21, 32]. Molecular typing of M. bovis isolates for the period 1998-2003 showed that wildlife species in DNP were infected only with those M. bovis typing patterns (TPs) that were more prevalent in local cattle. Furthermore, the results were suggestive of micro-evolutionary events in the local M. bovis population [32]. In the same period, M. bovis infection prevalence in DNP was 33% in European wild boar (Sus scrofa), 21% in red deer (Cervus elaphus), and 26% in fallow deer (Dama dama) [32]. In a more recent study, we confirmed infection with M. bovis in 52% wild boar, 27% red deer and 18% fallow deer from DNP in 2006-2007, and evidenced that M. bovis prevalence decreased from North to South in wild boar and red deer, whereas no clear spatial pattern was observed for fallow deer [21].
Three wild ungulates coexist in DNP, wild boar, fallow deer and red deer, along with domestic cattle subjected to bTB eradication programs. We included the wild species as our study models as all are highly susceptible to bTB and are known to show high prevalence in the area [21]. In addition, their different ecology and behavior peculiarities [33] can play a role in the epidemiology of mycobacteria, for example, variations in sociability or gregariousness, and scavenging habits. In addition, different habitats could provide variable environmental suitability for M. bovis persistence [6, 34]. In this sense, scrublands and woodlands are preferably used by red deer and wild boar compared with fallow deer [35–37].
In this study we used molecular epidemiological techniques to establish the extent of M. bovis strain richness and other environmental mycobacterial species in isolates collected in wildlife and cattle from the DNP, so as the association with social, spatial and environmental factors in this multi-host and multi-pathogen situation. We hypothesized that infection by mycobacteria would differ among hosts and sites depending on host, pathogen and local environment ecology. Fine-tuning mycobacterial epidemiology in DNP allowed rising a number of relevant questions: (1) Do hosts get infected twice by M. bovis and MOTT, and can this interfere in M. bovis infection or vice versa? (2) Have new M. bovis types appeared or have any changes in type composition taken place in recent years? (3) Is there an effect of the social group on infection risk? (4) Is there a spatial structure in mycobacteria distribution? (5) Are there species-specific variants of mycobacteria that could be attributed to species-specific behavior patterns (including inter-specific interaction) and/or to advanced host species-pathogen interactions?
Methods
Study area
The study was carried out in DNP, located in south-western Spain (37°0' N, 6°30' W) and covering 54,000 Ha. This is a flat region of sandy soils bordering the Atlantic Ocean, with a maximum elevation of 47 m. The climate is Mediterranean sub-humid with marked seasons. In the wet season (winter and spring), most of the marshlands are flooded and wildlife and cattle tend to graze in the more elevated scrublands [37]. In summer, the wetter and more productive ecotone between the scrublands and the marshes supports aggregations of wild and domestic ungulates. Human access is restricted and management is carried out by Park authorities. Limited traditional exploitation of some natural resources, such as logging, and cattle and horse rising are allowed. After 1994, when bTB in wildlife was first diagnosed in DNP a Government-sponsored program was initiated to eradicate bTB-positive cattle. Ungulate populations have been culled by shooting (between 200 and 500 individuals/year, the majority of them wild boar, or about 10-20% of the wild ungulate population estimated at 3,500 individuals).
Animal sampling
From April 2006 to April 2007, 124 European wild boar, 95 red deer, and 100 fallow deer were sampled within the park by shooting. The culling of wild ungulates was approved by the Research Commission of Doñana National Park in accordance with management rules established by the Autonomous Government of Andalucía. For each animal we recorded the exact position with GPS. Sex and age, based on tooth eruption patterns (animals less than 12 months old were classified as juveniles, those between 12 and 24 months as yearlings, and those more than 2 years old as adults; [38]), were recorded in the field. A necropsy was performed on site and the presence of tuberculosis-like lesions recorded by macroscopic inspection of lymph nodes and abdominal and thoracic organs [6]. This protocol included the examination of the lungs for the presence of TB-compatible macroscopic lesions during field inspection and a sample was collected. A tonsil and a head lymph node sample from each individual were collected for culture (Figure 1; Table 1). In wild boar, one piece of the tonsils and one from both mandibular lymph nodes were submitted for microbiological studies. In red deer and fallow deer, one piece of the tonsils and head lymphnode samples, always containing at least half left and half right medial retropharyngeal lymph node, were submitted for culture. Due to logistic and budget constraints, no thoracic or abdominal lymphoid tissues were cultured except when TB-compatible macroscopic lesions were evidenced.
Table 1
Mycobacterial identification and molecular typing results by species and sampling site within Doñana National Park (DNP), Spain (CR Coto del Rey; SO Los Sotos; EB Estación Biológica; PU El Puntal; MA Marismillas; see Figure 1 on molecular typing patterns and Figure 6 on regions within DNP).
Mycobacteria Other Than Tuberculosis (MOTT)
Mycobacterium bovis
Host
Site
n
M. scr.
M. int.
M. xen.
M. int.
Total MOTT
A1
A3
B2
B5
C1
D4
E1
F1
Total M. bovis
Wild boar
CR
14
12
1
13
SO
18
3
3
8
2
10
EB
31
2
6
3
11
5
2
7
PU
29
1
5
6
7
12
19
MA
32
5
7
1
13
Total
124
6
6
8
20
37
21
1
2
1
62
Red deer
CR
35
8
1
1
10
SO
35
6
1
7
8
1
9
EB
12
1
1
2
1
3
PU
3
1
1
2
MA
10
1
1
Total
95
6
3
9
19
1
2
1
1
24
Fallow deer
CR
36
2
2
7
1
8
SO
35
9
1
10
8
2
10
EB
9
3
1
4
2
2
PU
5
2
2
1
1
MA
15
Total
100
16
1
1
18
18
3
21
TOTAL
319
28
6
1
12
47
74
1
23
1
1
1
5
1
107
M. scr. = Mycobacterium scrofulaceum; M. int. = Mycobacterium interjectum, M. xen. = Mycobacterium xenopi, M. int. = Mycobacterium intracellulare
Table 2
Infection with Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacteria Other Than Tuberculosis (MOTT), or M. bovis/MOTT co-infection in wildlife hosts from Doñana National Park, Spain.
MOTT pos
MOTT neg
Host
M. bovispos
M. bovisneg
M. bovispos
M. bovisneg
Red deer
1
8
26
60
Fallow deer
3
15
19
63
Wild boar
4
16
57
47
Figure 1
Doñana National Park, Spain. Park boundary is marked by a solid line. From north to south: CR Coto del Rey; SO Los Sotos; EB Estación Biológica; PU El Puntal; MA Marismillas. Shadowed areas are marshlands used as cattle pastures (Marisma de Hinojos and Las Nuevas). Symbols show sampling sites for wild boar (squares), fallow deer (circles) and red deer (triangles).
Social groups were defined as animals sampled the same day at the same site, and with characteristics that were compatible with forming a stable (e.g. female-yearling) or seasonal (e.g. rut mixed) group. Only part of the individuals belonging to a given social group was sampled. Sampling was performed according to European (86/609) and Spanish laws (RD 223/1988; RD 1021/2005), and current guidelines for ethical use of animals in research (ASAB, 2006) and UCLM animal experimentation committee.
Microbiological procedures
Culture: The specimens were liquefied and decontaminated with an equal volume of N-acetyl-L-cysteine and 2% NaOH, mixed by centrifugal swirling, and then incubated for 15 min (24). The reaction was neutralized by adding 0.0067M phosphate-buffered saline (pH 6.8), to a final volume of 50 mL. The specimens were concentrated by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the sediment was re-suspended in 0.5 mL of sterile water. The sediment was used to inoculate two Löwestein-Jensen with pyruvate solid medium. Lowëstein-Jenssen slants were incubated at 37°C for 6 weeks and inspected weekly for growth. When growth was detected, a smear was prepared to confirm the presence of acid-fast bacilli from suspect colonies by Ziehl-Neelsen staining.
Identification
We identified M. bovis and MOTT to the species level and characterized M. bovis strains with spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing.
Macroscopic morphology of the colonies and pigment production was recorded. Identification at species level was performed with the GenoType®MTBC (Haim lifescience GmbH, Germany) for the Mycobacterium complex strains that allows the differentiation of M. africanum I, M. bovis BCG, M. bovis ssp. bovis, M. bovis ssp. caprae and M. tuberculosis/M. africanum II/M. canettii. MOTT strains were identified by the GenoType®Mycobacterium CM and Genotype®Mycobacterium AS MTBC (Haim lifescience GmbH, Germany). The GenoType assays were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions: DNA extraction by the DNA SSS method (REAL, DURVIZ, Valencia, Spain) was followed by PCR amplification of a trait of the 23S rRNA gene, as recommended. Reverse hybridization and detection were carried out on a shaking water bath (TwinCubator; Hain lifescience GmbH, Germany). The final identification was obtained by comparison of line probe patterns with the provided evaluation sheet [39].
Typing
The M. bovis isolates were further characterized by spoligotyping [40]. The amplified product was detected by hybridization of the biotin-labelled PCR product onto spoligotyping membrane (Isogen Bioscience BV, Maarssen, The Netherlands). Purified sterile water and chromosomal DNA of M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis BCG P3 were included as controls in each batch of tests. The patterns were allocated a number in the M. bovis spoligotyping database. The results were recorded in SB (spoligotype bovis) code, followed by a field of 4 digits as defined on the M. bovis Spoligotype Database website (http://www.mbovis.org).
All wildlife isolates (n = 107) were also subjected to MIRU-VNTR analysis (Table 1). Extensive documentation (online, Adobe PDF manual, and Flash tutorials) on the service and the genotyping methods is available at the MIRU-VNTRplus website (http://www.miru-vntrplus.org).
The analysis was carried out as described [41, 42], and primers previously reported were used to amplify the ETR-A and ETR-B loci (formally VNTR 2165 and VNTR 2461) [43], MIRU 4, 10, 16, 23, 26, 31 and 40 [14] using the recommended PCR conditions. Amplicon sizes were estimated by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel at 45 V during 2 h, using 100-bp ladder (Biotools B&M). Figure 2 presents the spoligotyping patterns, VNTR allelic profiles and typing pattern (TP) codes defined for this study.
Figure 2
Spoligotyping patterns, VNTR allelic variants, and codes used to define typing patterns (TPs) in this study. 1) VNTR allelic variants for MIRU10 were always 2, for MIRU16 always 3, for MIRU23 always 4, for MIRU26 always 5, for MIRU31 always 3 and for MIRU40 always 2. 2) Isolates with TP codes A4, G1, G6, H1 and I4 as in Romero et al. (2008).
Statistics
Chi-square tests were used for between-pair comparisons of prevalences. To test for the effect of host species vs site regarding the mycobacterial isolates, we used the Czechanovsky similarity index [44]. This index considers the list of mycobacterial species recorded in a given host type or in a given study area. It is calculated by dividing two times the species shared between two lists, by the total number of species of both lists, as follows:
Considering the animals in which any mycobacterial infection was diagnosed, three generalized linear mixed models (GLMM, SAS 9.0 software, GLIMMIX procedure) were explored to test different explanatory variables that affect the presence of a mycobacterial type or group. The most common mycobacterial groups were: (i) M. bovis (ii) M bovis A1 and (iii) M. scrofulaceum. The presence or absence of infection in a mycobacterial group was considered as a binary variable. The model was fitted using a logit link function. The model considered social group as a random effect. The model included host species (wild boar, fallow deer and red deer), the study area and age (juvenile: less than 2 years, adult: older than 2 years) as categorical explanatory variables. The distance to the water (log10-trasnformed) was included as a continuous predictor. To compare the spatial associations of infection by specific mycobacterial type and hosts, we included as explanatory continuous variable the ratio (log10-transformed) between the nearest neighbor distance from host to a different host species with the same type of mycobacteria relative to the nearest distance to a con-specific host with the same type of mycobacteria (calculated using ArcGis version 9.2, ESRI, Redlands, CA). A ratio >1 indicates that the nearest distance to a host with the same spoligotype is higher for a different host species. All the aforementioned explanatory variables we also included in the models interacting with the host species. Due to over-parameterization of the models and zero inflated data, no interactions were included in the M. bovis A1 and M. scrofulaceum models. P-value was set as ≤ 0.05. We estimated exact confidence limits for prevalence (proportions) using Sterne's exact method.
Results
Mycobacteria species and molecular types
We obtained a total of 154 mycobacterial isolates from DNP wildlife. This included 107 M. bovis isolates belonging to 8 different typing patterns (spoligotyping pattern + VNTR profile, TP), and 47 isolates belonging to four MOTT (Table 1). M. bovis TPs and MOTT species were isolated from wild boar (n = 82 isolates), red deer (n = 33 isolates), and fallow deer (n = 39 isolates) (Figure 3). Wild boar and red deer had 5 M. bovis TPs each, whereas fallow deer presented only 2 TPs. The number of different isolates per host (MOTT and M. bovis TPs combined) was 8 in wild boar, 7 in red deer and 5 in fallow deer (Table 1).
Figure 3
Mycobacterial isolates (in %) identified in red deer, fallow deer and wild boar from Doñana National Park, Spain. A1 to F1 are Mycobacterium bovis isolates as defined in Figure 1.
Regarding M. bovis, we identified 6 different spoligotyping patterns and 5 different VNTR allelic profiles (Figure 2). One spoligotyping pattern was new according to the M. bovis database, and was therefore introduced with code SB1610. Co-infection of a single host by two M. bovis TPs occurred in all three wild ungulate species. One adult male red deer was infected with TPs A1 and B2, one adult male and one adult female fallow deer were co-infected with TPs A1 and E1, and two wild boar (weaner and juvenile) were co-infected with TPs A1 and B2.
MOTT species found in wildlife hosts included M. scrofulaceum (28 isolates) and M. intracellulare (12 isolates), both found in all host species, M. interjectum (6 isolates, only in wild boar), and M. xenopi (1 isolate in a fallow deer; Table 1). In four deer and four wild boar, M. bovis and MOTT were isolated concurrently (6 M. scrofulaceum, 1 M. interjectum and 1 M. intracellulare). In a single wild boar, both types of mycobacteria were simultaneously isolated from the two tissue samples collected and cultured, while in the remaining cases M. bovis was isolated from either lymph nodes or tonsils and the MOTT from the tissue where M. bovis was absent. We recorded no cases of co-infection by different MOTT.
Table 2 presents the relationship between MOTT and M. bovis isolation in wildlife. In cattle from DNP sampled in 2006-07, all isolates corresponded to the two dominant M. bovis spoligotyping patterns: spoligotype A (SB1232) in 32 cases and spoligotype B (SB1230) in 15 cases. This proportion was not significantly different from the proportion observed among wild ungulates (75 spoligotype A, 24 spoligotype B, 8 other spoligotyping patterns; Chi-square = 4.7, 2 d.f., n.s.). Only one MOTT (M. intracellulare) was isolated from cattle.
Table 3
Molecular typing patterns of Mycobacterium bovis isolates obtained from Doñana wildlife and cattle in 1998-2003 (drawn from Romero et al., 2008) and in 2006-2007 (present study).
1998-2003
2006-2007
Wild boar
Red deer
Fallow deer
Other wildlife
Cattle
Wild boar
Red deer
Fallow deer
A1
14
8
13
4
22
37
19
18
A3
1
A4
1
B2
6
2
1
1
8
21
2
B5
1
C1
1
1
1
D4
2
1
E1
2
3
F1
1
1
G1
1
G6
2
H1
1
I4
2
The proportion of wild ungulate M. bovis typing patterns (TPs) other than the dominant A1 and B2 did not differ statistically from 1998-2003 to 2006-2007 (2.2 ± 4.3% in 1998-2003, 9.3 ± 5.5% in 2006-2007, Chi-square = 2.39, 1 d.f., n.s., confidence limits are calculated according to Sterne's exact method). No spoligotyping patterns other than the two dominant ones (A and B) were detected among 47 cattle isolates in 2006 and 2007.
Changes in mycobacterial typing patterns over time in DNP
All three M. bovis typing patterns recorded in DNP wildlife between 1998 and 2003 (A1, B2, C1) were still evidenced in similar proportions in 2006-2007 (Chi-square = 0.5, 2 d.f., n.s.). However, while only three different TPs had been detected in DNP wildlife in the first period, up to 8 different ones were found in the second period (Table 3). Two of these "new" TPs (D4 and F1) had already been recorded in cattle sampled in DNP between 1998 and 2003. However, 3 other TPs (A3, B5, and E1) had never before been reported in DNP.
Table 4
Spoligotyping patterns of Mycobacterium bovis isolates from Doñana cattle, by zone.
Zone
A
B
Marisma de Hinojos (Large, N to S ranging Marshland)
7
3
Los Sotos (SO)
7
2
El Puntal (PU)
5
5
Las Nuevas (Southern Marshland, close to MA and PU)
6
3
Zone not known
7
2
Total
32
15
In contrast with the situation in wildlife and to data from 1998-2003, when 10 out of 41 cattle spoligotyping patterns were different from A and B, no spoligotyping patterns other than the two dominant ones (A and B, Table 4) were detected among 47 cattle isolates in 2006 and 2007 (Chi-square = 12.9, 3 d.f., p < 0.001).
Table 5
Czechanovsky similarities (in %) (from north to south, CR Coto del Rey; SO Los Sotos; EB Estación Biológica; PU El Puntal; MA Marismillas) and host species (WB wild boar; RD red deer; FD fallow deer) in DNP.
CR
SO
EB
PU
MA
WB
RD
FD
CR
-
50
36
40
20
57
62
54
SO
-
55
60
40
57
62
91
EB
-
89
67
77
67
60
PU
-
75
67
73
67
MA
-
67
54
44
WB
-
53
61
RD
-
50
FD
-
Spatial structure
Regarding the MOTT (Table 1, Figures 4 and 5), M. interjectum was only found in wild boar from EB, in the central part of DNP. In contrast, M. scrofulaceum was found in all three wildlife hosts (but not in cattle) in CR (2 isolates), SO (18), EB (5), and PU (3). The only MOTT found in cattle (one M. intracellulare isolate) was isolated from a cow raised in PU. M. intracellulare was often isolated from wild boar in PU and EB, and also from one fallow deer in EB and two red deer in SO and MA, respectively.
Figure 4
Spatial structure of Mycobacteria Other Than Tuberculosis (MOTT) andMycobacterium bovisisolates from wild ungulates in Doñana National Park, Spain. MOTT were proportionally more frequent in the central parts of the park (SO, EB, PU; see Figure 6).
Figure 5
Mycobacteria Other Than Tuberculosis (MOTT) isolates by host and site in Doñana National Park, Spain (AMycobacterium scrofulaceum; BM. interjectum; CM. xenopi; DM. intracellulare). The solid line indicates the park limit and the dashed line the marshland (dark area) waterline. Symbols show sampling locations for wild boar (squares), fallow deer (circles) and red deer (triangles).
Table 5 shows the Czechanovsky similarities between the mycobacteria isolates in different sites and host species in DNP. For example, in column and row 1 from Table 5, the similarity indices of the CR mycobacterial community (in the north of DNP) decrease towards the south of the Park (MA; 20%; see also Figure 6). The highest similarity indices were observed between neighboring sites such as between EB and PU (89%) and MA and PU (75%). All hosts had their highest similarities with mycobacterial communities from the central sites of DNP.
Table 6
Czechanovsky similarities (in %) between the mycobacteria isolates in wild boar, red deer and fallow deer from CR (WBcr, RDcr, FDcr), wild boar, red deer and fallow deer from the remaining sites of DNP (WBr, RDr, FDr), and the remaining host species from the CR site (red and fallow deer RDFDcr; wild boar and fallow deer WBFDcr; wild boar and red deer WBRDcr)
WBr
RDr
FDr
RDFDcr
WBFDcr
WBRDcr
WBcr
22
29
RDcr
25
29
FDcr
75
29
Figure 6
Spatial structure ofM. bovisisolate typing patterns (TPs) from wild ungulates in Doñana National Park, Spain. A North (CR) South (MA) gradient in type A1 and an inverse one in type B2 are evident.
Table 6 shows the Czechanovsky similarities between the mycobacteria isolates in wild boar, red deer and fallow deer from CR (WBcr, RDcr, FDcr), wild boar, red deer and fallow deer from the remaining sites of DNP (WBr, RDr, FDr), and the remaining species from the CR site (red and fallow deer RDFDcr; wild boar and fallow deer WBFDcr; wild boar and red deer WBRDcr). The highest similarity occurred between fallow deer from CR and from the remaining parts of DNP (75%).
Table 7
Mycobacteria species and Mycobacterium bovis typing patterns (TPs) isolated from wild boar (WB), red deer (RD) and fallow deer (FD) presumptive social groups in Doñana National Park (f-fawn; y-yearling; w-weaner; ad-adult; ♀-female; ♂-male; numbers before a colon indicate more than one individual of same characteristics).
Code-Area
Group
Code-Area
Group
WB1-MA
♀-ad-A1; ♂-y-B2
RD10-EB
♀-ad-(-); ♀-ad-A1
WB2-MA
3: ♂-f-(-); ♀-f-(-); 2: ♀-ad-(-); ♀-ad-B2
RD11-SO
♀-ad-C1; ♀-ad-A1
WB3-MA
♂-y-B2; ♂-y-(-)
RD12-SO
♀-f-(-); ♀-ad-scrofulaceum, ♀-ad-intracellulare
WB4-MA
2: ♂-w-A1; ♂-w-(A1+B2)
RD13-CR
2: ♀-ad-(-); ♀-y-(-)
WB5-MA
2: ♀-ad-(-); ♀-y-(-); m-y-(-)
RD14-CR
2: ♀-ad-(-); ♀-y-M. bovis
WB6-PU
♀-ad-B2; ♂-w-B2
RD15-CR
♀-y-(-); ♀-ad-(-)
WB7-PU
♀-ad-(-); ♀-ad-intracellulare
RD16-CR
♂-ad-A1; ♂-ad-D4
WB8-PU
♀-ad-intracellulare; ♀-w-B2
RD17-PU
2: ♂-ad-(-)
WB9-EB
♀-y-A1; ♂-y-(A1+intracellulare)
RD18-EB
♂-ad-intracellulare; ♂-ad-(-)
WB10-CR
3: ♂-w-A1; 2: ♀-ad-(-)
RD19-EB
2: ♀-ad-(-)
WB11-EB
♂-ad-(-); ♀-ad-(-); ♀-ad-scrofulaceum
RD20-CR
2: ♂-ad-(-)
WB12-EB
♀-w-(-); ♀-w-intracellulare
RD21-MA
2: ♂-ad-(-)
WB13-EB
♂-y-(-); ♀-y-(-); ♂-ad-(-)
WB14-SO
2: ♀-y-E1
FD1-SO
♂-f-A1; ♀-ad-A1
WB15-PU
♀-ad-B2; ♀-ad-A1
FD2-SO
7: ♀-ad-(-); ♀-ad-A1; ♂-f-(-)
WB16-PU
♂-ad-B2; ♂-y-B2; ♀-y-intracellulare
FD3-CR
♂-ad-(-); ♂-ad-A1
WB17-PU
♂-ad-A1; ♀-ad-intracellulare
FD4-CR
2: ♀-f-(-); 2: ♀-ad-(-)
WB18-PU
2: ♂-y-A1
FD5-SO
♂-y-xenopi; ♂-ad-(A1+scrofulaceum)
WB19-PU
♀-ad-(-); ♂-w-B2; ♂-w-intracellulare
FD6-SO
♀-y-A1; ♀-ad-(-)
WB20-CR
♂-y-A1
FD7-CR
♀-y-(-); ♀-ad-(A1+E1)
WB21-CR
♂-ad-A1
FD8-CR
♀-y-(-); ♂-y-A1
WB22-PU
2: ♀-w-B2; ♀-ad-(-)
FD9-CR
2: ♀-y-(-)
WB23-MA
♂-ad-(-); ♀-ad-A1
FD10-MA
2: ♂-ad-(-)
WB24-SO
♀-w-(-); ♀-w-A1; ♂-w-scrofulaceum
FD11-MA
2: ♀-ad-(-); ♂-ad-(-)
WB25-PU
♂-ad-scrofulaceum; ♂-ad-(-)
FD12-EB
2: ♂-ad-(-); ♂-y-A1; ♀-ad-intracellulare
WB26-CR
♀-ad-A1; ♂-y-A1
FD13-SO
♂-ad-(A1+E1); ♂-ad-E1
FD14-EB
♂-y-(-); ♀-ad-(-)
RD1-SO
♂-y-(-); ♂-ad-(-)
FD15-CR
2: ♀-ad-(-); ♀-ad-A1; ♀-y-(-); ♀h-f-(-)
RD2-SO
2: ♂-ad-(-)
FD16-PU
♂-ad-(-); ♂-ad-scrofulaceum
RD3-CR
2: ♂-ad-A1
FD-17-SO
♂-ad-(-); ♂-ad-scrofulaceum
RD4-SO
♀-y-(-); ♂-ad-(-)
FD18-CR
2: ♂-ad-(-)
RD5-CR
2: ♂-ad-(-)
FD19-SO
♀-f-scrofulaceum; ♀-ad-A1; ♀-y-(-); ♀-ad-(-)
RD6-SO
5: ♂-ad-(-)
FD20-MA
2: ♀-ad-(-); ♀-f-(-)
RD7-SO
♀-y-(-); ♀-ad-A1; ♂-ad-A1
FD21-MA
♂-ad-M. bovis; ♂-ad-(-)
RD8-CR
♀-ad-(-); ♂-ad-(-)
FD22-CR
2: ♂-ad-A1
RD9-SO
♂-ad-A1; ♀-y-A1
FD23-CR
♂-y-(-); ♂-ad-(-)
TP identification (A1...E1) as in Figure 2.
Factors affecting the presence of M. bovisTPs and MOTTs
Social groups, defined as animals sampled the same day at the same site, and with characteristics that were compatible with forming a stable (e.g. female-yearling) or seasonal (e.g. rut mixed) social group were characterized (Tables 7 and Table 8). In total, 52% of 69 social groups were infected with M. bovis. Among red deer, 21 groups were identified, M. bovis infecting deer in one third of these groups (n = 7; 33%). In fallow deer, we identified 22 groups with 12 (54%) including at least one M. bovis infected individual. Up to 26 wild boar groups were identified, and 20 (77%) were found infected with M. bovis. Regarding the proportion of social groups with more than one TP, no between host species statistical differences were evidenced. After eliminating one infected individual per group, red deer (Chi-square = 16.1, 1 d.f., p<0.001) and wild boar Chi-square = 7.7, 1 d.f., p<0.01) from infected groups were more probably infected than con-specifics from non infected ones but this did not occur in fallow deer (Chi-square = 1.4, 1 d.f., n.s.).
Table 8
Mycobacterium bovis isolates and typing patterns (TPs) from presumptive social groups of red deer, fallow deer and wild boar from Doñana National Park, Spain.
Host
n
% groups infected
Not infected
Single isolate
Multiple isolates
One TP
Several TPs
Red deer
21
33.3
14
2
3
2
Fallow deer
22
54.5
10
9
2
2
Wild boar
26
76.9
6
7
10
3
Total
69
52.1
30
19
15
6
Table 9
Estimates of parameters and standard errors for different variables that affect the presence of (i) Mycobacterium bovis (ii) M. bovis A1 and (iii) M. scrofulaceum.
(i) M. bovis
d.f. num/den
Parameter estimates ± S.E.
P-value
Host species
2/1
RD = 0.7 ± 14.6, FD = -15.0 ± 17.4
0.99
Area
4/1
CR = 8.2 ± 37.9, EB = 0.4 ± 2.3, MA = -10.4 ± 28.8, PU = 0.99 ± 2.0
0.96
Age
1/85
0.8 ± 0.7
0.24
Distance to marsh
1/78
2.7 ± 2.9
0.03
Distance to other host species similarly infected
1/94
-1.3 ± 0.4
0.19
Host species*area
2/74
Not shown
0.53
Host species*Distance to marsh
7/1
RD*distance = 0.5 ± 4.5, FD*distance = 6.3 ± 5.7
0.96
Distance to other host sim. inf. *host species
2/95
RD*distance = 2.2 ± 1.2, FD*distance = 3.8 ± 1.1
0.002
(ii)M. bovisA1
Host species
2/103
RD = -0.8 ± 1.2, FD = -2.1 ± 1.1
0.18
Area
4/97
EB = -0.9 ± 1.2, MA = -3.0 ± 1.5, PU = -2.8 ± 1.2
0.008
Distance to marsh
1/97
-1.7 ± 1.3
0.20
Distance to other host species similarly infected
1/111
0.1 ± 0.2
0.81
(iii)M. scrofulaceum
Host species
2/87
RD = 2.4 ± 1.8, FD = 6.3 ± 1.7
0.001
Area
4/85
CR = -5.4 ± 1.9, EB = -1.2 ± 1.7, MA = -9.8 ± 13.0, PU = -2.0 ± 2.3
0.08
Distance to marsh
1/72
2.1 ± 1.9
0.26
Distance to other host species similarly infected
1/119
0.8 ± 0.4
0.03
Reference levels for 'Area' and 'Host species' are 'SO (Sotos)' and 'wild boar' respectively.
FD = fallow deer, RD = red deer. CR = Coto del Rey, EB = Estación Biológica, MA = Marismillas, PU = El puntal.
Statistics concerning the GLMMs to test the factors affecting the presence of a given mycobacterial type or group are shown in Table 9. Concerning the M. bovis vs MOTT GLMM, the distance to water was statistically higher in MOTT infected individuals than in M. bovis ones (MOTT mean distance to water = 1989 ± 245 m; M. bovis mean distance to water ± SD = 1513 ± 164 m). The ratio of the minimum distances to similarly infected hosts (which in average were always higher than 1 for the three host species and analyzed mycobacterial groups) statistically interacted with the host. The ratios (log10-trasnformed) were similar for MOTT and M. bovis in both deer species (2.13 ± 0.36 and 2.11 ± 0.32 for MOTT and M. bovis in red deer; 2.01 ± 0.11 and 1.95 ± 0.35 m for MOTT and M. bovis in fallow deer), whereas they were higher for M. bovis than MOTT in the wild boar (2.71 ± 0.36 and 3.55 ± 0.20 m for MOTT and M. bovis). This would indicate that in wild boar the intraspecific spatial aggregation of M. bovis is higher than for MOTT.
When attending to specific mycobacterial types, there were statistical differences between zones for bovis TP A1, so that it was dominant in wild ungulates from the north of DNP (Table 1, Figure 6). There were statistical differences in the probability of infection by M. scrofulaceum relative to other types among host species (wild boar = 7.3%; Red deer = 18.2% and fallow deer = 41.0%; Table 1). M. scrofulaceum presented a lower intraspecific spatial aggregation than the remaining mycobacterial types (2.19 ± 0.20 and 2.90 ± 0.15 m ratios for M. scrofulaceum and the remaining types, respectively).
Discussion
This study provided new insights into the ecology of M. bovis and environmental mycobacteria in complex host and pathogen communities, showing that mycobacteria are structured by host species and sampling site, even at very small spatial scales. The study also showed that host species differences in spatial patterns may greatly depend on behavioral and/or specific host-pathogen-environment interactions, for which our molecular and ecological approach allowed obtaining valuable information on the involved risk factors.
Mycobacterial species and typing patterns
Contrary to most previous studies in wildlife, where single TPs tend to dominate in each geographical region [e.g. [19, 20, 45]] we detected a high richness of both MOTT and M. bovis TPs in DNP. Whereas single TPs are indicative of single introduction events of M. bovis, in our case the high identified TP richness is probably a consequence of (i) historical cattle breeding and consequent exchanges with breeders from outside the park, (ii) variable conditions provided by high environmental diversity, and (iii) the diversity and abundance of suitable wildlife hosts.
Multiple infection of a wildlife host with several M. bovis TPs had recently been found in one wild boar from this study area [32]. This observation is rare in wildlife M. bovis hosts [46]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting co-infection of red deer and fallow deer with several M. bovis TPs. Moreover, the efficiency of isolating mycobacteria could have been improved with the inclusion of liquid media, suggesting that we detected only part of the true co-infections. The relevance of these findings is that they demonstrate that M. bovis infected wildlife hosts may become infected more than once under natural conditions, at least in areas of high infection pressure such as DNP. These results also suggest that cross-protection between different M. bovis strains is limited, further underlining the importance of genetic factors rather than immune responses in controlling mycobacterial infections in wildlife [11, 47, 48]. Additionally, the infection exclusion reported for closely related genotypes of other intracellular bacteria of the genus Anaplasma [49] did not appear to occur for M. bovis TPs.
Co-existence of members of the M. tuberculosis complex and MOTT, such as M. intracellulare, had already been reported in human patients [50]. As previously discussed, the fact that we found several M. bovis - MOTT co-infections suggests that infection by one organism does not impede infection by the other in these wildlife host species. However, in all three wildlife hosts, isolation of one group of mycobacteria occurred more frequently in individuals not infected by the other group, suggesting that either some competition between mycobacteria or some laboratory bias towards the first identifiable growth may exist. This is also suggested by the finding that in all cases but in one, M. bovis was isolated from either lymph nodes or tonsils and the MOTT from the tissue where M. bovis was absent. In humans, it has been suggested that BCG vaccination protects children against cervical lymph node infection by MOTT [27].
Several authors have reported infection of wild boar with M. scrofulaceum, M. interjectum, M. xenopi and M. intracellulare [51, 52]. All four MOTT recorded in this study had also already been reported in other wildlife species [18, 53]. However, this is the first report of M. xenopi in deer.
Changes over time in DNP
Apparently, the community of M. bovis in domestic cattle lost strain richness from time one (1998-2003) to time two (2006-2007), which may result from the application of the official test and slaughter program. However, the alternative hypothesis of some rare strains going undetected at any sampling period cannot be completely excluded. Part of the new TPs isolated from wildlife had been reported in cattle in the earlier survey (D4, F1). This suggests cases of spill-over from cattle to wild ungulates, and subsequent maintenance of these TPs in wildlife reservoir hosts. Other TPs had been detected neither in DNP cattle nor in wildlife, but are widespread in Spain (e.g. F1, SB0120). This would suggest a recent introduction, possibly via infected cattle. However, TP E1 is of particular interest. This TP had never been detected, but is similar to the dominant TP A1 except for one spacer. More sampling and long term studies are needed in order to test whether pathogen evolution resulted in higher TP richness in wildlife species when compared to cattle [32].
Spatial structure
Our finding that different wildlife species were infected with the same types at a very local scale suggests that transmission is likely to occur between the species. Fallow deer differed from red deer and wild boar in showing more homogeneity in their mycobacterial isolates, regardless of the sampling area. This may be due to a higher rate of movement of fallow deer between areas and therefore relates to specific territorial and aggregation behaviors as commented above. This in turn would be relevant for disease control, suggesting a higher capacity of this host for spreading pathogens over long distances. The different distribution patterns of M. bovis TPs may be due to historical introduction of different TPs, presumably by infected cattle, in different parts of DNP or, alternatively, if environmental survival of mycobacteria plays a role, to a better adaptation of certain TPs to the varying habitat characteristics of northern and southern DNP.
Factors affecting the presence of M. bovisTPs and MOTTs
In a previous paper we found that infection risk in wild boar was dependent on wild boar M. bovis prevalence in the buffer area containing interacting individuals. However, this was not evidenced for deer [21]. In this study, using the identification of social groups as an alternative tool, we found that red deer and wild boar were more prone to be infected with M. bovis if they were part of a group with at least one infected deer, while as commented above, this was not the case for fallow deer. High intraspecific transmission rates at early ages within wild boar social groups have been suggested in wild boar from Spain [6], and this probably relates to close interaction when foraging or routing. Animal behavior is an important aspect of disease/host dynamics that as yet has not been well documented but may play an important role in the transmission in free-ranging wildlife populations [33]. Owing to higher contact rates and common environmental risk factors, bTB transmission should occur more frequently within certain social groups. Recently, [1] used host population genetics to show that contact within family groups probably was a significant mechanism of M. bovis transmission among white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Michigan (USA). In DNP, modelling suggested that wild boar infection probability depends on wild boar bTB prevalence in a buffer zone of interacting individuals, while no such effect was observed in deer [21].
The fallow deer was the only species whose mycobacterial community showed more intra-species similarity throughout DNP than site similarity. Although fallow deer displayed the lowest prevalence (which is probably related to a lower natural host susceptibility, [21]), its highly gregarious behavior and subsequent increased transmission risk (at least during seasonal rutting) may cause mycobacterial strains to be shared by many social groups after social disruption. This is consistent with the finding that fallow deer displayed the lowest M. bovis prevalence, but a disproportionally high social group prevalence (i.e. spread across population subunits) as compared to that of red deer. That is, the findings that fallow deer belonging to groups with infected individuals were only rarely infected, or that most infected fallow deer groups had only one infected animal, strongly suggest that either the intra-specific intra-group transmission rate or the susceptibility of fallow deer to bTB is lower than in red deer. However, the alternative explanation that culturing from head lymphoid tissue only missed to detect infection disproportionally more in fallow deer than in red deer or wild boar cannot be excluded.
Confirming the above discussed, a spatial structuring in the mycobacterial isolates was evidenced for M. bovis A1 type, so that it was dominant in wild ungulates from the north of DNP while B2 was dominant in the south (Table 1, Figure 6). When we assessed the spatial associations (measured as nearest distances to similar and other host species) of M. bovis TPs, MOTT, and M. scrofulaceum, our findings were consistent with spatial aggregation of the host species with the same types.
The spatial distribution of M. bovis versus MOTT was probably linked with the water, since wildlife hosts infected with M. bovis were most often sampled closer to the marshland than MOTT. Environmental water sources could act not only as environmental sources of mycobacteria but also by favoring closer contact between the species [7], and this could promote more the transmission of M. bovis by close contact than indirect transmission of MOTT, which one would expect to be more dependent on external factors.
There were statistical differences in the probability of infection by M. scrofulaceum relative to other types among host species. M scrofulaceum is a slow-growing atypical mycobacteria that is found in environmental water sources. Nonetheless, no association was evidenced with distance to marshland. We speculate that the rooting behavior of wild boar may relate to increased exposure to this mycobacteria than other hosts. Nonetheless, our study does not discard that advanced host species-pathogen interactions may also result in different relative occurrences of mycobacterial types across the studied host species.
Conclusions
The diversity of mycobacteria described herein is indicative of multiple introduction events and a complex multi-host and multi-pathogen epidemiology in DNP. Fine-tuning the epidemiology of mycobacterial infections allowed us to answer a number of relevant questions: First, co-infection of a single host by two M. bovis TPs occurred in all three wild ungulate species, confirming that one host can get infected twice. Second, significant changes in the mycobacterial isolate community may have taken place, even in a short time period (1998 to 2007). Third, we confirmed that red deer and wild boar, but not fallow deer from infected social groups were more probably infected than those from non infected groups. Hence, we agree with the views of several authors suggesting that aspects of host social organization should be taken into account in wildlife epidemiology [1, 8]. Fourth, we got insights of spatial structure in mycobacteria distribution, and discussed both habitat-related and host-related explanations for the observed differences. Finally, we conclude that wildlife in DNP is frequently exposed to different species of non-tuberculous, environmental mycobacteria, which could interact with the immune response to pathogenic mycobacteria, although the effects are unknown [54].
In the present study we found evidence of mixed infection, i.e., co-infection of a single host by two M. bovis TPs in all three wild ungulate species, and also four deer and four wild boar concurrently presented M. bovis and MOTT. The possibility of cross contamination at laboratory or DNA level was ruled out. Nonetheless the sensitivity of bacterial culture and DNA fingerprinting for the identification of more than one mycobacteria species or M. tuberculosis complex strain may be limited when the strains are not present in the particular cultured organ/tissue. In the context of the endemicity of tuberculosis and the possibility of repeated exposure to newer infections, one can expect more cases with multiple strain infection [55]. Therefore more research concerning whether infection with one strain would protect against infection with another strain is needed.
Molecular typing did not allow inferring the direction of transmission [32]. However, findings of rare TPs such as E1 among both fallow deer and wild boar strongly suggest that interspecies transmission and/or common sources of infection do occur among wild ungulates. Conversely, the lack of isolation of rare M. bovis spoligotype patterns from cattle of the 2006-2007 sample suggests that spill-back from the wildlife reservoir to livestock may not be a very usual event. The results highlight the suitability of molecular typing for surveys at small spatial and temporal scales. However, increased surveillance along with a better understanding of the transmission routes, environmental persistence, and associated risk factors (e.g. scavenging) are needed if we are to effectively control bovine TB in DNP. One remaining question relates to the influence of the genotype of mycobacteria on the virulence [56], which may be mediated by secondary infections, which should be addressed by future research.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
We thank Manuel Reglero and colleagues from IREC and Jose Antonio Muriel and colleagues from the Doñana National Park for making the sampling possible. The study was funded by Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía. This is a contribution to EU FP7 grant TB-STEP 212414 and CICYT - MCINN research grants AGL2008-03875 and AGL2010-20730. Studies on diseases shared between domestics and wildlife are also supported by grants and contracts from INIA, Castilla-La Mancha, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino (SDGPP), and Grupo Santander - Fundación Marcelino Botín. P. Acevedo is enjoying a Juan de la Cierva research contract awarded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICINN) and is also supported by the project CGL2006-09567/BOS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
IREC National Wildlife Research Institute (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM)
(2)
Departamento de Microbiología, Universidad de Sevilla
(3)
Biogeography, Diversity, and Conservation Research Team, Department of Animal Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Malaga
(4)
Servicio de Microbiología, HH UU Virgen del Rocío
(5)
Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Estación Biológica Doñana, CSIC
(6)
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University
References
Blanchong JA, Scribner KT, Kravchenko AN, Winterstein SR: TB-infected deer are more closely related than non-infected deer. Biol Lett. 2007, 3: 103-105. 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0547.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Aranaz A, de Juan L, Montero N, Sanchez C, Galka M, Delso C, Álvarez J, Romero B, Bezos J, Vela AI, Briones V, Mateos A, Domínguez L: Bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) in wildlife in Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 2602-2608. 10.1128/JCM.42.6.2602-2608.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gortázar C, Ferroglio E, Hofle U, Frolich K, Vicente J: Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock: a European perspective. Eur J Wildl Res. 2007, 53: 241-256.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Vicente J, Gortázar C, Höfle U, Fernandez-de-Mera IG, Amos W: Genetic resistance to bovine tuberculosis in the Iberian wild boar. Mol Ecol. 2005, 14: 3209-3217. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02656.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Vicente J, Höfle U, Garrido JM, Fernández-de-Mera IG, Juste R, Barral M, Gortázar C: Wild boar and red deer display high prevalences of tuberculosis-like lesions in Spain. Vet Res. 2006, 37: 107-119. 10.1051/vetres:2005044.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Vicente J, Höfle U, Garrido JM, Fernandez-De-Mera IG, Acevedo P, Juste RA, Barral M, Gortázar C: Risk factors associated with prevalence of tuberculosis-like lesions in wild boar and red deer in South Central Spain. Vet Res. 2007, 38: 451-464. 10.1051/vetres:2007002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Vicente J, Höfle U, Fernández-de-Mera IG, Gortázar C: The importance of parasite life-history and host density in predicting the impact of infections in red deer. Oecologia. 2007, 152: 655-664. 10.1007/s00442-007-0690-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Acevedo P, Vicente J, Ruiz-Fons JF, Cassinello J, Gortázar C: Estimation of European wild boar relative abundance and aggregation: a novel method in epidemiological risk assessment. Epid Infect. 2007, 135: 519-527. 10.1017/S0950268806007059.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Martin-Hernando MP, Höfle U, Vicente J, Ruiz-Fons F, Vidal D, Barral M, Garrido JM, de la Fuente J, Gortázar C: Lesions associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex infection in the European wild boar. Tuberculosis. 2007, 87: 360-367. 10.1016/j.tube.2007.02.003.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Naranjo V, Acevedo-Whitehouse A, Vicente J, Gortázar C, de la Fuente J: Influence of methylmalonyl-CoA mutase alleles on resistance to bovine tuberculosis in the European wild boar (Sus scrofa). Anim Genet. 2008, 39: 316-320. 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01725.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Naranjo V, Gortazar C, Vicente J, de la Fuente J: Evidence of the role of European wild boar as a reservoir of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Vet Microbiol. 2008, 127: 1-9. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.10.002.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Collins DM, De Lisle GW, Gabric DM: Geographic distribution of restriction types of Mycobacterium bovis isolates from brush-tailed possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) in New Zealand. J Hyg (Lond). 1986, 96: 431-438. 10.1017/S0022172400066201.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gortázar C, Vicente J, Samper S, Garrido J, Fernandez-De-Mera IG, Gavín P, Juste RA, Martín C, Acevedo P, de la Puente M, Hofle U: Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates from wild ungulates in South-Central Spain. Vet Res. 2005, 36: 43-52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Lutze-Wallace C, Turcotte C, Sabourin M, Berlie-Surujballi G, Barbeau Y, Watchorn D, Bell J: Spoligotyping of Mycobacterium bovis isolates found in Manitoba. Can J Vet Res. 2005, 69: 143-145.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Baker MG, Lopez LD, Cannon MC, De Lisle W, Collins DM: Continuing Mycobacterium bovis transmission from animals to humans in New Zealand. Epid Infect. 2006, 134: 1068-1073. 10.1017/S0950268806005930.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Delahay RJ, Smith GC, Barlow AM, Walker N, Harris A, Clifton-Hadley RS, Cheeseman CL: Bovine tuberculosis infection in wild mammals in the south-west region of England: a survey of prevalence and a semi-quantitative assessment of the relative risk to cattle. Vet J. 2007, 173: 287-301. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.11.011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
De Lisle GW, Kawakami RP, Yates GF, Collins DM: Isolation of Mycobacterium bovis and other mycobacterial species from ferrets and stoats. Vet Microbiol. 2008, 132: 402-407. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.05.022.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
De Vos V, Raath JP, Bengis RG, Kriek NJP, Huchzermeyer H, Keet DF, Michel A: The epidemiology of tuberculosis in free ranging African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 2001, 68: 119-130.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Michel AL, Coetzee ML, Keet DF, Maré L, Warren R, Cooper D, Bengis RG, Kremer K, van Helden P: Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis isolates from free-ranging wildlife in South African game reserves. Vet Microbiol. 2009, 133: 335-343. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.07.023.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gortázar C, Torres MJ, Vicente J, Acevedo P, Reglero M, de la Fuente J, Negro JJ, Aznar J: Bovine tuberculosis in Doñana biosphere reserve: the role of wild ungulates as disease reservoirs in the last Iberian lynx strongholds. PLoS ONE. 2008, 3: e2776-PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Zanella G, Durand B, Hars J, Moutou F, Garin-Bastuji B, Duvauchelle A, Femé M, Karoui C, Boschiroli ML: Mycobacterium bovis in wildlife in France. J Wildlife Dis. 2008, 44: 99-108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Woodroffe R, Donnelly CA, Johnston WT, Bourne FJ, Cheeseman CL, Clifton-Hadley RS, Cox DR, Gettinby RG, le Fevre AM, McInerney JP, Morrison WI: Spatial association of Mycobacterium bovis infection in cattle and badgers Meles meles. J Appl Ecol. 2005, 42: 852-862. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01081.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Jenkins HE, Woodroffe R, Donnelly CA, Cox DR, Johnston WT, Bourne FJ, Cheeseman CL, Clifton-Hadley RS, Gettinby G, Gilks P, Hewinson RG, McInerney JP, Morrison WI: Effects of culling on spatial associations of Mycobacterium bovis infections in badgers and cattle. J Appl Ecol. 2007, 44: 897-908. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01372.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Collins DM: DNA typing of Mycobacterium bovis strains from the Castlepoint area of the Wairarapa. N Z Vet J. 1999, 47: 207-209.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Corner LAL, Stevenson MA, Collins DM, Morris RS: The re-emergence of Mycobacterium bovis infection in brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula) after localised possum eradication. N Z Vet J. 2003, 51: 73-80.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Primm TP, Lucero CA, Falkinham JO: Health Impacts of Environmental Mycobacteria. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004, 17: 98-106. 10.1128/CMR.17.1.98-106.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
De Baere T, Moerman M, Rigouts L, Dhooge C, Vermeersch H, Verschraegen G, Vaneechoutte M: Mycobacterium interjectum as causative agent of cervical lymphadenitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 725-727. 10.1128/JCM.39.2.725-727.2001.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Fukuoka M, Matsumura Y, Kore-eda S, Iinuma Y, Miyachi Y: Cutaneous infection due to Mycobacterium interjectum in an immunosuppressed patient with microscopic polyangiitis. Br J Dermatol. 2008, 159: 1382-1384. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08867.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
van Ingen J, Boeree MJ, de Lange WC, Hoefsloot W, Bendien SA, Magis-Escurra C, Dekhuijzen R, van Soolingen D: Mycobacterium xenopi clinical relevance and determinants, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008, 14: 385-389. 10.3201/eid1403.061393.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Romero B, Aranaz A, Sandoval A, Alvarez J, de Juan L, Bezos J, Sanchez C, Galka M, Fernandez P, Mateos A, Dominguez L: Persistence and molecular evolution of Mycobacterium bovis population from cattle and wildlife in Doñana National Park revealed by genotype variation. Vet Microbiol. 2008, 132: 87-95. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.04.032.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Conner MM, Ebinger MR, Blanchong JA, Cross PC: Infectious Disease in Cervids of North America. Data, Models, and Management Challenges. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008, 1134: 146-172. 10.1196/annals.1439.005.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Miller R, Kaneene JB, Fitzgerald SD, Schmitt SM: Evaluation of the influence of supplemental feeding of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) on the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in the Michigan wild deer population. J Wildl Dis. 2003, 39: 84-95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Braza F, Álvarez F, Geldof R, Byloo H: Desplazamientos de ungulados silvestres a través de una zona de ecotono en Doñana. Doñana. Acta Vert. 1984, 11: 275-287.Google Scholar
Braza F, Alvarez F: Habitat use by red deer and fallow deer in Doñana National Park. Misc Zool. 1987, 11: 363-367.Google Scholar
Saenz De Buruaga M, Lucio AJ, Purroy J: Reconocimiento de sexo y edad en especies cinegéticas. Edited by: Diputación Foral de Álava. 1991Google Scholar
Russo C, Tortoli E, Menichella D: Evaluation of the New GenoType Mycobacterium Assay for Identification of Mycobacterial Species. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 334-339. 10.1128/JCM.44.2.334-339.2006.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, vanAgterveld M, vanSoolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J: Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 907-914.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Roring S, Scott A, Brittain D, Walker I, Hewinson G, Neill S, Skuce R: Development of variable-number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium bovis: Comparison of results with those obtained by using existing exact tandem repeats and spoligotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 2126-2133. 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2126-2133.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Supply P, Allix C, Lesjean S, Cardoso-Oelemann M, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Willery E, Savine E, de Haas P, van Deutekom H, Roring S, Bifani P, Kurepina N, Kreiswirth B, Sola C, Rastogi N, Vatin V, Gutierrez MC, Fauville M, Niemann S, Skuce R, Kremer K, Locht C, van Soolingen D: Proposal for standardization of optimized mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable number tandem repeat typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006, 44: 4998-4510. 10.1128/JCM.01392-06.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Frothingham R, Meeker-O'Connell WA: Genetic diversity in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex based on variable numbers of tandem DNA repeats. Microbiology. 1998, 144: 1189-1196. 10.1099/00221287-144-5-1189.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Smith NH, Dale J, Inwald J, Palmer S, Gordon SV, Hewinson RG, Smith JH: The population structure of Mycobacterium bovis in Great Britain: clonal expansion. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 15271-15275. 10.1073/pnas.2036554100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Naranjo V, Ayoubi P, Vicente J, Ruiz-Fons F, Gortázar C, Kocan KM, de la Fuente J: Characterization of selected genes upregulated in non-tuberculous European wild boar as possible correlates of resistance to Mycobacterium bovis infection. Vet Microbiol. 2006, 116: 224-231. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.03.013.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Naranjo V, Gortázar C, Villar M, de la Fuente J: Comparative genomics and proteomics to study tissue-specific response and function in natural Mycobacterium bovis infections. Anim Health Res Rev. 2007, 8: 81-88. 10.1017/S1466252307001260.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
de la Fuente J, García-García JC, Blouin EF, Saliki JT, Kocan KM: Infection of tick cells and bovine erythrocytes with one genotype of the intracellular ehrlichia Anaplasma marginale excludes infection with other genotypes. Clin Diagn Lab Immun. 2002, 9: 658-668.Google Scholar
Takeda M, Ito W, Kobayashi N, Konno K, Takahashi T, Tatsuko R, Tomita N, Tanigai T, Chiba T, Yamaguchi K, Sato K, Ueki S, Kayaba H, Chihara J: Co-existence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium intracellulare in one sputum sample. Intern Med. 2008, 47: 1057-60. 10.2169/internalmedicine.47.0511.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Machackova M, Matlova L, Lamka J, Smolik J, Melicharek I, Hanzlikova M, Docekal J, Cvetnic Z, Nagy G, Lipiec M, Ocepek M, Pavlik I: Wild boar (Sus scrofa) as a possible vector of mycobacterial infections: review of literature and critical analysis of data from Central Europe between 1983 and 2001. Vet Med. 2003, 48: 51-65.Google Scholar
Zanetti S, Bua A, Molicotti P, Delogu G, Mura A, Ortu S, Sechi LA: Identification of mycobacterial infections in wild boars in Northern Sardinia, Italy. Acta Vet Hung. 2008, 56: 145-52. 10.1556/AVet.56.2008.2.1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Bercovier H, Vincent V: Mycobacterial infections in domestic and wild animals due to Mycobacterium marinum, M. fortuitum, M. chelonae, M. porcinum, M. farcinogenes, M. smegmatis, M. scrofulaceum, M. xenopi, M. kansasii, M. simiae and M. genavense. Rev Sci Tech. 2001, 20: 265-290.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Michel AL, Hlokwe TM, Coetzee ML, Maré L, Connoway L, Rutten VPMG, Kremer K: High Mycobacterium bovis genetic diversity in a low prevalence setting. Vet Microbiol. 2008, 126: 151-159. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.07.015.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Richardson M, Carroll NM, Engelke E, Gian D, van der Spuy , Salker F, Munch Z, Gie RP, Warren RM, Beyers N, van Helden PD: Multiple Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in early cultures from patients in a high-incidence community setting. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 2750-2754. 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2750-2754.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
Petrelli D, Sharma MK, Wolfe J, Al-Azem A, Hershfield E, Kabani A: Strain-related virulence of the dominant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain in the Canadian province of Manitoba. Tuberculosis. 2004, 84: 317-326. 10.1016/j.tube.2004.01.001.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
