Skip to main content


We're creating a new version of this page. See preview

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Characterization of exceptionally thermostable single-stranded DNA-binding proteins from Thermotoga maritima and Thermotoga neapolitana

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
BMC Microbiology201010:260

  • Received: 9 June 2010
  • Accepted: 15 October 2010
  • Published:



In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in SSBs because they find numerous applications in diverse molecular biology and analytical methods.


We report the characterization of single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBs) from the thermophilic bacteria Thermotoga maritima (Tma SSB) and Thermotoga neapolitana (Tne SSB). They are the smallest known bacterial SSB proteins, consisting of 141 and 142 amino acid residues with a calculated molecular mass of 16.30 and 16.58 kDa, respectively. The similarity between amino acid sequences of these proteins is very high: 90% identity and 95% similarity. Surprisingly, both Tma SSB and Tne SSB possess a quite low sequence similarity to Escherichia coli SSB (36 and 35% identity, 55 and 56% similarity, respectively). They are functional as homotetramers containing one single-stranded DNA binding domain (OB-fold) in each monomer. Agarose mobility assays indicated that the ssDNA-binding site for both proteins is salt independent, and fluorescence spectroscopy resulted in a size of 68 ± 2 nucleotides. The half-lives of Tma SSB and Tne SSB were 10 h and 12 h at 100°C, respectively. When analysed by differential scanning microcalorimetry (DSC) the melting temperature (Tm) was 109.3°C and 112.5°C for Tma SSB and Tne SSB, respectively.


The results showed that Tma SSB and Tne SSB are the most thermostable SSB proteins identified to date, offering an attractive alternative to Taq SSB and Tth SSB in molecular biology applications, especially with using high temperature e. g. polymerase chain reaction (PCR).


  • High Thermostability
  • Sulfolobus Solfataricus
  • Native Molecular Mass
  • Mesophilic Protein
  • ssDNA Binding


Single-stranded DNA-binding (SSB) proteins play an essential role in all in vivo processes involving ssDNA. They interact with ssDNA and RNA, in an independent from sequence manner, preventing single-stranded nucleic acids from hybridization and degradation by nucleases [1]. SSB proteins play a central role in DNA replication, repair and recombination [24]. They have been identified in all classes of organisms, performing similar functions but displaying little sequence similarity and very different ssDNA binding properties. Based on their oligomeric state, SSBs can be classified into four groups: monomeric, homodimeric, heterotrimeric and homotetrameric. A prominent feature of all SSBs is that the DNA-binding domain is made up of a conserved motif, the OB (oligonucleotide binding) fold [5]. Most of the bacterial SSBs exist as homotetramers. However, recent discoveries have shown that SSB proteins from the genera Thermus and Deinococcus possess a different architecture. SSB proteins in these bacteria are homodimeric, with each SSB monomer encoding two OB folds linked by a conserved spacer sequence [69].

At present, with the exception of SSB from Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis [11], all bacterial thermostable SSBs belong to the Deinococcus-Thermus phylum. They have been found in T. aquaticus [6, 12], T. thermophilus [6, 12], D. radiodurans [7], D. geothermalis [13], D. murrayi [14], D. radiopugnans [15], D. grandis and D. proteolyticus [16]. In addition, thermostable SSBs have also been found in thermophilic crenarchaea e. g. Sulfolobus solfataricus [17].

Thermotoga maritima and T. neapolitana are strictly anaerobic heterotrophic Eubacteria growing in marine environments at temperatures ranging from 50 to 95°C. Their DNA base composition is 46 and 41 mol% guanine+cytosine, respectively [18, 19]. Among the Eubacteria sequenced to date, T. maritima has the highest percentage (24%) of genes that are highly similar to archeal genes. The observed conservation of gene order between T. maritima and Archaea in many of the clustered regions suggests that lateral gene transfer may have occurred between thermophilic Eubacteria and Archaea [20].

Genomes of bacteria presented in the NCBI database have been screened in search for ssb gene homologs and their organization. In all the genomes, one or more genes coding for an SSB homolog were found [21]. On the basis of the ssb gene organization and the number of ssb paralogs, they classified bacteria in four different groups. T. maritima was classified as group II, which contains bacteria with the ssb gene organization rpsF-ssb-rpsR.

In the present study the purification and characterization of two highly thermostable SSB proteins from T. maritima and T. neapolitana are described.


Sequence analysis

The Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins contained 141 and 142 amino acid residues with a calculated molecular mass of 16.30 and 16.58 kDa, respectively. They are the smallest prokaryotic SSB proteins so far identified (E. coli SSB with N-terminal methionine consists of 178 amino acid residues). Analysis of the primary structures by RPS-BLAST [22] revealed the presence of two distinctive regions: one putative OB-fold domain (from amino acid 1-120) and one C-terminal domain that contains five conserved DEPPF terminal amino acids, which are common in all known bacterial SSB proteins.

Figure 1 shows an alignment of amino acid sequences of T. maritima, T. neapolitana, Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis, Sulfolobus solfataricus and E. coli SSB proteins containing one OB-fold domain for monomer, and T. aquaticus, T. thermophilus, D. geothermalis and D. radiopugnans thermostable SSB proteins containing two OB-fold domains for monomer. The similarity between the amino acid sequences of Thermotoga SSBs is very high: 90% identity and 95% similarity. Surprisingly, both Thermotoga SSBs had a quite low sequence similarity to Escherichia coli SSB (Tma SSB has 36% identity and 55% similarity, Tne SSB has 35% identity and 56% similarity), whereas the similarity to Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis SSB3 was higher (63 and 64% similarity; 40 and 42% identity for Tma SSB and Tne SSB, respectively).
Figure 1
Figure 1

A: Multiple amino acid sequence alignment of SSB proteins. Alignment was performed by dividing amino acids into six similarity groups: group 1, V, L, I and M; group 2, W, F and Y; group 3, E and D; group 4, K and R; group 5, Q and D; group 6, S and T. White fonts on black boxes denote 100% identity; white fonts on grey boxes show <80% similarity; black fonts on grey boxes show <60% similarity. B: Dendogram of SSB proteins. Abbreviations: Tma, T. maritima strain MSB8; Tne, T. neapolitana; EcoK12, E. coli K12; TteSSB2, TteSSB3, T. tengcongensis strain MB4; Taq, T. aquaticus strain YT1; Tth, T. thermophilus strain HB8; Dge, D. geothermalis; Drp, D. radiopugnans strain R1; Sso, S. solfataricus P2; N, N-terminal ssDNA-binding domain; C, C-terminal ssDNA-binding domain.

Expression and purification of the recombinant TmaSSB and TneSSB proteins

Using the recombinant plasmid pETSSBTma or pETSSBTne, the expression of inducible proteins with the predicted size was excellent (Figure 2, lanes 1 and 5). Both proteins were expressed in a soluble form in the cytosol. Heat treatment resulted in considerably less contamination by the host proteins (Figure 2, lanes 2 and 6). The E. coli overexpression system used in this study produced about 40 and 35 mg of purified Tma SSB and Tne SSB protein, respectively, from 1 l of induced culture. The purity of the protein preparations was about 99% (Figure 2, lanes 4 and 8).
Figure 2
Figure 2

Expression and purification of the Tma SSB and Tne SSB. Proteins expression were obtained from the pET30Ek/LIC vector in BL(DE3)pLysS E. coli cells. Proteins were examined on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Lane M, Marker Wide Range (Sigma) with the molecular mass of proteins marked; lanes 1 and 5, soluble protein cell extracts after IPTG induction of protein expression (10 μl); lanes 2 and 6, Tma SSB and Tne SSB after heat treatment at 80°C for 20 min (10 μl); lane 3 and 7, Tma SSB and Tne SSB after chromatography on a QAE-cellulose column (10 μl); lane 4 and 8, Tma SSB and Tne SSB after chromatography on a ssDNA-cellulose column (10 μl).

Oligomerization status of the TmaSSB and TneSSB proteins

Analysis of the purified proteins by SDS-PAGE revealed a single major band with a molecular mass of about 16 kDa for both proteins. In contrast, analysis by gel filtration chromatography revealed single peaks with a molecular mass of about 60.48 kDa for Tma SSB and 61.86 kDa for Tne SSB (Figure 3). This native molecular mass is approximately is 3.7 times the molecular mass of the monomer for both proteins. This confirmed our prediction that in solution the Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins exist as homotetramers. Chemical cross-linking using glutaraldehyde confirmed the tetrameric state of the examined proteins (not shown).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Analytical gel filtration of Tma SSB and Tne SSB on Superdex HR 75 column. A standard linear regression curve was generated by plotting the log of the molecular mass of the calibration proteins against their retention times (min) and is shown. The calibration proteins include bovine albumin (66 kDa), ovalbumin (43 kDa), carbon anhydrase (29 kDa) and cytochrome C (12.4 kDa).

DNA-binding properties

When (dT)35, (dT)60 or (dT)76 were incubated with increasing amounts of Tma SSB or Tne SSB, a single band of reduced mobility was observed (Figure 4, complex I). Most of those oligonucleotides were shifted after addition of 10 pmol of SSBs, and the mobility of the shifted band remained constant at the higher protein amounts (100 pmol). One band of identical mobility was observed for (dT)120 at the low protein amounts, but a second band with a lower mobility appeared at the higher protein amounts (100 pmol; Figure 4, complex II)). These results suggest that Tma SSB and Tne SSB bind to (dT)35, (dT)60 or (dT)76 as one single homotetramer whereas two SSB homotetramers bind to (dT)120. Similar binding patterns were observed with the Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins in different salt concentrations (2 or 100 mM NaCl).
Figure 4
Figure 4

Binding of Tma SSB and Tne SSB to oligo(dT) and to M13 ssDNA- gel mobility shift assays.

The binding of the Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins to the naturally occurring circular M13 ssDNA (6,407 nucleotides) was also examined. In this experiment, a fixed amount of M13 ssDNA was incubated with increasing amounts of SSB protein, and the resulting complexes were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis (Figure 4). When increasing amounts of Tma SSB or Tne SSB protein were added to M13 ssDNA, there was a progressive decrease in the mobility of the M13 ssDNA.

To further explore the binding properties of the examined SSB proteins, we used fluorescence spectroscopy. All bacterium SSB proteins (both homotetrameric and homodimeric) studied so far have shown a dramatic decrease of tryptophan fluorescence when binding to ssDNA. With an excitation wavelength of 295 nm, the emission spectrum of SSB proteins at 25°C had a maximum at 348 nm, which is consistent with tryptophan fluorescence. When adding a saturating quantity of ssDNA, the intrinsic fluorescence at 348 nm was quenched by 95% for both the Tma SSB and the Tne SSB proteins. The estimated size of the ssDNA binding site in the presence of 2 or 100 mM of NaCl for the Tma SSB and the Tne SSB proteins was 68 ± 2 nt (Figure 5). None binding-mode transition was observed when changing the ionic strength from low (2 mM NaCl) to high salt (100 mM NaCl). In all cases, the cooperative affinity is estimated to be in the range of 107-108 M-1.
Figure 5
Figure 5

Inverse fluorescence titration of Tma SSB and Tne SSB with (dT) 76 . A 1 nM sample of Tma SSB (A) and Tne SSB (B) was titrated with (dT)76 at 2 mM NaCl (filled figures) or 100 mM NaCl (open figures) in binding buffer.


The half-lives of the ssDNA-binding activities of Tma SSB and Tne SSB at 100°C, determined by gel mobility shift assays, were 10 h and 12 h, respectively. The thermostability for Taq SSB was 30 s at 95°C, 3 min at 90°C and 15 min at 85°C, as was also shown by Dąbrowski et al. [6].

When analyzed by differential scanning microcalorimetry (DSC) the thermal unfolding of Tma SSB, Tne SSB and Taq SSB was found to be an irreversible process, as seen in the rescan thermograms (Figure 6). The Tne SSB had the highest thermostability, with a melting temperature (Tm) of 112,5°C, whereas Tma SSB had a T m of 109,3°C (Figure 6). The melting temperature of Taq SSB was only 86,8°C. This difference in Tm confirmed the different thermostabilities of the proteins indicated by the observed half-lives of the ssDNA binding activities. The thermograms of these SSB proteins did not show any characteristic signs of heavily aggregated proteins after heat denaturation. Moreover, the results of the DSC and the half-lives of the ssDNA binding activities suggest that the loss of binding activity of Tma SSB, Tne SSB and Taq SSB was connected with an irreversible thermal unfolding of the proteins.
Figure 6
Figure 6

DSC thermograms of SSB proteins. Samples containing 1.5 mg/ml SSB were analyzed in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.5 and 0.1 M NaCl.

In summary, the results showed that Tma SSB and Tne SSB are the most thermostable SSB proteins identified to date.


In this study, we have described the purification and characterization of SSB proteins from the thermophilic bacteria T. maritima and T. neapolitana. The results of the sequence analysis verified that a ssDNA binding domain (the first 106 amino acid residues) in one monomer of both Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins possess a canonical oligonucleotide binding fold (OB-fold), very similar to the observed in the structure of E. coli SSB [23, 24]. Both Tma SSB and Tne SSB form tetramers in solution as was shown by the gel filtration chromatography experiments. Furthermore, they possess the shortest and most acidic C-terminal domains yet identified (from 107 to 141 or 142 amino acid residues, respectively). The C-terminal domains contain 40% and 41.7% negatively charged amino acids, respectively.

Studies of other SSBs have often shown that the size of the binding site depends on the salt concentration. For example, for Eco SSB, at least two distinctly different DNA-binding modes have been described [3]. In high salt concentrations, 65 nt bind per Eco SSB tetramer with almost 90% fluorescence quench, whereas in low salt concentrations 35 nt are sufficient to saturate the protein and quench its fluorescence by only 53%. This phenomenon has also been demonstrated for all known Deinococcus-Thermu s SSBs [6, 1316]. However, such a distinctly different binding mode in high salt concentrations was not observed for the Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins. The agarose gel mobility assays indicated that the binding site per tetramer is salt independent and is approximately 68 nucleotides based on fluorescence spectroscopy.

Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins originating from the same genus, Thermotoga, showed quite similar thermostability (measured with an indirect method), i.e. 10 h and 12 h at 100°C, respectively. Both proteins possessed a higher thermostability than even the most thermostable Tte SSB2, which maintained full activity even after 6 h of incubation at 100°C [11]. Additionally, the results of differential scanning microcalorimetry (DSC) also demonstrated a very high thermostability of both the SSB proteins. Tne SSB had a higher thermostability (Tm of 112,5°C) than Tma SSB (T m of 109,3°C), whereas in comparison the melting temperature of Taq SSB was only 86,8°C. Therefore the thermostability of Tma SSB or Tne SSB was much higher in comparison to the thermostability of homodimeric SSBs from the thermophilic T. aquaticus, D. radiopugnans [15] and D. murrayi [14]. In conclusion, the Tma SSB and Tne SSB are the most thermostable SSB protein identified up to date, offering an attractive alternative for Taq SSB and Tth SSB for applications in molecular biology and for analytical purposes especially for PCR and RT-PCR.

None of the two SSB proteins from Thermotoga seemed to possess any special features relative to Eco SSB and compared with other known thermostable SSBs. Neither their relative content of different amino acids nor the sequence comparisons could fully explain the cause of their exceptional thermostability. However, there were certain differences in the content of some amino acid residues. For example, the space between the highly hydrophobic core monomer and the highly acidic C-terminal fragment is very short in the Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins in comparison with Eco SSB. This has also been demonstrated for SSBs from other highly thermophilic microorganisms like T. aquaticus and T. thermophilus [6]. This characteristically short and flexible C-terminus could protect the protein from thermal denaturation and make it more thermostable [6].

Based on the structure data the Tma SSB and Eco SSB proteins (without their flexible C-termini) [30, 24] were analyzed to find more clues about the thermostability of SSBs from Thermotoga. The homology modeling of the protein regions which lack electron density was carried out using Modeller version 9.2 [31]. The modeled residues were 24 and 25, 38 to 48, 86 to 92 of Tma SSB and 1 and 2, 24 to 27, 40 to 49 of Eco SSB.

Thermostability seems to be a property acquired by a protein through a combination of many small structural modifications that are achieved with the exchange of some amino acid residues for others and the modulation of the canonical forces (e.g. hydrogen bonds, disulfide bonds, ion-pair interactions, hydrophobic interactions) found in all proteins [32]. The molecular mechanisms of thermostability are varied and depend on the specific protein [33]. The factors contributing to the protein stability include additional intermolecular interactions (e.g. hydrogen bonds, disulfide bonds, ion-pair interactions, hydrophobic interactions) and good general conformation structure (i.e. compact packing, more rigid, conformational strain release) [32].

The structural similarity between the Tma SSB and Eco SSB proteins is quite high but there are many characteristic features in the structures of Tma SSB monomer and tetramer which account for the thermostability [Tab. 1]. The amount of salt bridges in thermophile proteins is higher than in the equivalent proteins of mesophiles. The number of salt bridges in the tetramer of Tma SSB is by over 50% higher than in the Eco SSB tetramer, whereas in the Tma SSB monomer it is even by 100% higher than in the Eco SSB. A few of the Tma SSB salt bridges are particularly important for the protein stability, e.g. one of them which stabilizes the C-terminus (Figure 7A). It was showed that protein thermostability is correlated with the number of hydrogen bonds. The terminal β-strand (β6) of Tma SSB is a single long strand stabilized by the hydrogen bonds with the residues of the preceding antiparallel β-strand (β5), whereas in Eco SSB there are two shorter β-strands (β452 and β5) divided by an additional loop that destabilizes this important region (Figure 7B). These two intermolecular interactions, stabilize this essential protein region thus enhancing the anchoring the Tma SSB C-terminus. The amino acid sequence alignments of thermophilic and the mesophilic proteins have displayed some significant substitutions in thermophilic proteins such as Gly to Pro [34]. The OB-fold of Tma SSB protein has a threefold higher content of Pro residues, whereas the content of Gly residues is twice lower than that of Eco SSB [Tab. 1]. Furthermore, there are three loops containing Pro residues in the Tma SSB protein and there is only one in Eco SSB, which makes the former less susceptible to unfolding than the latter.
Table 1

Results of structural comparison Tma SSB and Eco SSB proteins. Packing density calculated by means Voronoia software and procedure described in [38].


Packing Density


Amino acid residues

Shape correlation statistic (Sc)






Monomer Eco SSB







Tetramer Eco SSB






Monomer Tma SSB







Tetramer Tma SSB





Figure 7
Figure 7

Structural superposition of the DNA-binding domain of the Tma SSB and Eco SSB. Two views of superposition of Tma SSB (red) and Eco SSB (blue) rotated against each others to visualized salt bridge and flexible loop. The superposition indicates a structurally conserved core with flexible loops. (A) The discussed salt bridge Tma SSB protein between Asp108 (red) and Arg12 (light blue) and Arg73 (light blue). (B) The additional flexible loop of Eco SSB (yellow). Structures prepared with using VMD version 1.8.7 [37].

Enhanced molecular compactness can enhance thermal stability. Compactness can be achieved by e.g. optimized packing or the elimination of unnecessary cavities [35]. The packing density of both a monomer and tetramer is slightly higher in Tma SSB whereas the number of cavities is as much as 25% higher in Eco SSB.

In order to examine the geometrical fit between the surfaces A and B subunits and AB and CD pairs of SSB proteins [30, 24], the shape correlation statistic (Sc) [36] for Tma SSB and Eco SSB interfaces were calculated. This statistic provides a measure of packing of two protein surfaces. A value of Sc = 0 indicates no geometrical fit, whereas a value of Sc = 1 corresponds to two perfectly packed surfaces. Calculation of the shape correlation statistic gave a value of Sc = 0.68 or 0.77 for the interface of monomers A/B Eco SSB and Tma SSB, respectively. But surprisingly even more difference was for this parameter for interfaces between paired monomers AB/CD that equals 0.56 and 0.74 for Eco SSB and Tma SSB, respectively. These results indicate specifically that geometrical fit between Tma SSB protein surfaces is incomparably higher than Eco SSB.

In E. coli, the SSB base-stacking residues are Trp-40, Trp-54, Phe-60, and Trp-88, and in both Tma SSB and Tne SSB the related residues are Phe-31, Phe-52 or Phe-53, Phe-58 or Phe-64 and Trp-86 (Figure 1). Highly conserved His-55, Gln-76 and Gln-110, important for homotetramerization of Eco SSB, were not found in the SSB proteins from Thermotoga.


We report here the purification and characterization of T. maritima and T. neapolitana SSBs, and how they relate to, and differ from, other members of this important class of proteins.

The Tma SSB and Tne SSB are the smallest known bacterial SSB proteins, their molecular mass deduced from the 141 and 142 amino acid sequences were 16.30 and 16.58 kDa, respectively.

The half-lives of Tma SSB and Tne SSB were extremely long: 10 h and 12 h at 100°C, respectively. When analyzed by differential scanning microcalorimetry (DSC) the melting temperature (Tm) was 109.3°C and 112.5°C for Tma SSB and Tne SSB, respectively. These results were very surprising in the context of half-life of SSB proteins from thermophilic Thermus and Deinococcus.

The results showed that Tma SSB and Tne SSB are the most thermostable SSB proteins identified to date and those thermostability of both SSB proteins offer an attractive tool for many applications in molecular techniques, especially for thermal nucleic acids amplification methods (e. g. PCR).


Bacterial strains, plasmids, enzymes and reagents

Thermotoga maritima MSB8 (DSM 3106) and T. neapolitana (DSM 4359) were purchased from DSMZ (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH, Germany). The E. coli TOP10F' (Invitrogen, USA) and BL21(DE3)pLysS (Novagen, UK) strains were used for genetic constructions and proteins expression, respectively. The reagents for PCR, the oligodeoxynucleotides, and the oligonucleotides 5'-end-labelled with fluorescein were purchased from DNA-Gdańsk II (Poland). Restriction enzymes, IPTG, and agarose were from Fermentas (Lithuania). The plasmid pET30Ek/LIC (Novagen, UK) was used for construction of the expression system. The reagents for protein purification were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA).

Cloning the ssb genes from T. maritima and T. neapolitana

Chromosomal DNA from T. maritima and T. neapolitana was isolated using the Genomic DNA AX Bacteria kit (A&A Biotechnology, Poland). In the T. maritima (GenBank accession no. AE000512) genome, the ssb gene is flanked by the conservative rpsF and rpsR genes encoding the ribosomal proteins S6 and S18. Hence, primers complementary to the most conservative regions of those genes were designed and synthesized for PCR amplification. The forward primer was 5'-GGGTATGAGAAAGTTCGCCT (20 nt) and the reverse primer was 5' ATCTGTCTTGCCCTTTTGATG (21 nt). PCR reactions were performed using 1U of Pwo polymerase (DNA-Gdańsk II, Poland) in 50 μl buffer containing 10 mM KCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.8, 10 mM (NH)2SO4, 0.1% Triton X-100, 2 mM MgSO4, 1 mM dNTPs, 0.4 μM of each primer and approximately 200 ng of T. maritima or T. neapolitana DNA. Forty cycles were performed with a temperature profile of 60 s at 94°C, 90 s at 54°C and 120 s at 72°C. Specific PCR products, about 900 bp, were obtained and sequenced to confirm the presence of ssb-like gene.

Based on the ssb gene sequences from T. maritima and T. neapolitana, gene-specific primers for PCR were designed and synthesized. PCR was carried out using the forward 5'-GCGCAT ATG TCTTTCTTCAACAAGATC (27 nt) and reverse 5'-ATAAGCTT AATCA AAATG GTGGTTCATC (28 nt) primers for the ssb gene of T. maritima and the forward 5'- GCGCAT ATG TCTTTTTTCAACAGGATC (27 nt) and reverse 5'- ATAAGCTT AATCA GAATGGCG GTTCGTC (28 nt) primers for the ssb gene of T. neapolitana. The boldface parts of the primer sequences are complementary to the nucleotide sequences of the ssb genes in T. maritima and T. neapolitana, respectively, whereas the 5' overhanging ends of the primers contain recognition sites for restriction endonucleases and are designed to facilitate cloning (the Nde I and Hin dIII recognition sites are underlined; the ATG start codon and TGA stop codon are shown in italics). The PCR conditions were the same as described above. Both PCR products (0.5 μg) were digested with Nde I and Hin dIII and analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. Specifically, approximately 420 bp amplification products were cut out of the gel and purified using the Gel-Out AX kit (A&A Biotechnology, Poland). The purified DNA fragments were ligated into pET30Ek/LIC between the Nde I and Hin dIII sites. E. coli strains TOP10F' cells were transformed with the ligation mixtures and the colonies obtained were examined for the presence of ssb genes from T. maritima and T. neapolitana by PCR amplification and restriction analysis. Single clones, named pETSSBTma and pETSSBTne, were selected and sequenced to ascertain the authenticity of the clones. The constructed plasmids were used in the expression and purification procedure described below.

Protein sequence analysis of the TmaSSB and TneSSB

The amino acid sequences of the Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins were analyzed using standard protein-protein BLAST and RPS-BLAST. Multiple sequence alignments were created using the program MAFFT and the results were analyzed and edited using the editor program GeneDoc (copyright by Karl Nicholas). Dendogram of the amino acid sequences of SSB proteins were edited using the editor program Dendroscope [25].

Expression and purification of the TmaSSB and TneSSB

The E. coli BL21(DE3)pLysS strain transformed with pETSSBTma or pETSSBTne was grown at 37°C in 0.5 L LB containing 34 μg/ml kanamycin and 50 μg/ml chloramphenicol to an OD600 of 0.4. Expression was then induced by addition of IPTG to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. After 6 h, the cells were harvested by centrifugation, and suspended in 50 ml buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100). The purification procedure was very similar to the previously published purification scheme for the SSB from calf thymus [26], and that for thermostable SSB proteins [6]. Generally, the cells were disrupted by sonication and the insoluble debris were removed by centrifugation. The supernatant was heat-treated at 80°C for 20 min and denatured mesophilic proteins were discarded by centrifugation. This supernatant was directly loaded on a QAE-cellulose column (50 ml bed volume, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), from which the proteins were eluted with a linear gradient of 0.05-2 M NaCl in buffer B (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). The SSB-containing fractions, detected by SDS-PAGE, were combined and loaded on a ssDNA-cellulose column (5 ml, USB, USA). SSB proteins were eluted with gradient of 0.5-1.5 M NaCl and 50% ethylene glycol. The fractions with SSB proteins were collected and dialyzed against buffer B, concentrated using an Amicon Ultra-10 centrifugal filter device (Millipore, USA), and stored at -20°C in buffer C (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 50% glycerol, 0.05% Igepal) until used. The purity of Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins was examined by the optical densitometry on the SDS-PAGE gel and the amounts were estimated spectrophotometrically using the appropriate absorption coefficient factor.

Estimation of the native molecular mass

The molecular mass of the Tma SSB and the Tne SSB protein was determined by two independent methods: (i) FPLC gel filtration on a Superdex HR 75 column (Amersham Bioscience AB, Sweden), (ii) optimized chemical cross-linking experiments using 0.1% (v/v) glutaraldehyde for 1-30 min with Tma SSB or Tne SSB concentrations between 50 and 500 μg/ml [27]. Bovine albumin (66 kDa), ovalbumin (43 kDa), carbon anhydrase (29 kDa) and cytochrome C (12.4 kDa) were used as standard proteins for calibration in the gel filtration assay.

Gel mobility shift assays: binding to ss oligonucleotides

A fixed quantity (10 pmol) of 5'-end fluorescein-labelled oligonucleotides (dT)35, (dT)60, (dT)76 or (dT)120 or ssDNA of phage M13 (1.5 pmol) was incubated for 20 min at 25°C with 10, 100 or 200 pmol of Tma SSB or Tne SSB in 10 μl of binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA) containing 2 mM or 100 mM NaCl. Next, the reaction products were loaded onto 2% agarose gels without ethidium bromide and separated by electrophoresis in TAE buffer (40 mM Tris acetate pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA). The bands corresponding to the unbound ssDNA, and the various SSB-ssDNA complexes following ethidium bromide staining were visualized by UV light and photographed.

Fluorescence titration

Fluorescence was measured with a Perkin-Elmer LS-5B luminescence spectrometer as described earlier [28]. For the binding reaction, 2 ml binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA) containing 2 or 100 mM NaCl was used. A constant amount of Tma SSB or Tne SSB (1 nM) protein was incubated in the buffer at 25°C with varying quantities of (dT)76 oligonucleotide (from 0 to 0.8 nM). The excitation and emission wavelengths were 295 and 348 nm, respectively. The binding curve was analyzed using the model as described by Schwarz and Watanabe [29] with n as binding site size, ω·K as cooperative binding affinity and fluorescence quench Qf as parameters. Fluorescence quench is defined as 1 -Fbound/Ffree, where Ffree and Fbound denote the fluorescence intensities measured for free and nucleic acid bound protein, respectively


To determine the thermostability of the Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins, both an indirect and a direct (differential scanning calorimetry, DSC) method was used.

In the indirect method, a fixed quantity (10 pmol) of a 5'-end fluorescein-labeled oligonucleotide (dT)35 was added to 10 pmol of Tma SSB, Tne SSB or Taq SSB (control sample) preincubated at 85 °C, 90 °C, 95 °C and 100 °C for 0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min in 10 μl binding buffer containing 100 mM NaCl. In further experiments with the Tma SSB and Tne SSB proteins, the incubation times at 100°C were increased to 2, 4, 8, 10, 11 and 12 h. After 20 min incubation at 25 °C, the protein-DNA complexes were separated from free DNA by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel, and 50% quantities of protein-(dT)35 complex were evaluated by densitometric analysis using the VersaDoc imaging system and the QuantityOne software (BioRad, USA).

Microcalorimetric measurements were performed using a NanoDSC microcalorimeter (Calorimetry Science Corporation, USA). Samples containing 1.5 mg/ml SSB in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.5 and 0.1 M NaCl were analyzed. The calorimetric scans were carried out between 20 and 130°C with a scan rate of 1°C/min (Figure 6). The reversibility of the transition was checked by cooling and reheating the same sample with the scan rate of 1°C/min. Results from the DSC measurements were analyzed with the NanoAnalyze Software V 1.1 (TA Instruments, USA).

Nucleotide sequence accession number

The nucleotide sequences of the ssb genes of T. maritima and T. neapolitana are available in the GenBank database under the accession numbers AAD35689[20] and GU125728, respectively.

List of abbreviations used


Double-stranded DNA

OB fold: 

Oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold


Replication protein A




Single-stranded DNA.



This work was supported by the Gdańsk University of Technology. We thank the Laboratory of Intermolecular Interaction of Biomacromolecules at the Centre of Excellence ChemBioFarm for allowing access to the NanoDSC microcalorimeter used in this work.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Microbiology, Gdańsk University of Technology, ul. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biochemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, ul. Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland


  1. Greipel J, Urbanke C, Maass G: The single-stranded DNA binding protein of Escherichia coli. Physicochemical properties and biological functions. Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction. Edited by: Saenger W, Heinemann U. 1989, London: Macmillan, 61-86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Alani E, Thresher R, Griffith JD, Kolodner RD: Characterization of DNA-binding and strand-exchange stimulation properties of y-RPA, a yeast single-strand-DNA-binding protein. J Mol Biol. 1992, 227: 54-71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lohman TM, Overman LB: Two binding modes in Escherichia coli single strand binding protein-single stranded DNA complexes. Modulation by NaCl concentration. J Biol Chem. 1985, 260: 3594-3603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Meyer RR, Laine PS: The single-stranded DNA-binding protein of Escherichia coli. Micobiol Rev. 1990, 54: 342-380.Google Scholar
  5. Murzin AG: OB (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide binding)-fold: common structural and functional solution for non-homologous sequences. EMBO J. 1993, 2: 861-867.Google Scholar
  6. Dąbrowski S, Olszewski M, Piątek R, Brillowska-Dąbrowska A, Konopa G, Kur J: Identification and characterization of single-stranded-DNA-binding proteins from Thermus thermophilus and Thermus aquaticus - new arrangement of binding domains. Microbiology. 2002, 148: 3307-3315.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernstein DA, Eggington JM, Killoran MP, Misic AM, Cox MM, Keck JL: Crystal structure of the Deinococcus radiodurans single-stranded DNA-binding protein suggests a mechanism for coping with DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 8575-8580.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Eggington JM, Haruta N, Wood EA, Cox MM: The single-stranded DNA-binding protein of Deinococcus radiodurans. BMC Microbiol. 2004, 4: 2-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kur J, Olszewski M, Długołącka A, Filipkowski P: Single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) - sources and applications in molecular biology. Acta Biochim Pol. 2005, 52: 569-574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Witte G, Urbanke C, Curth U: Single-stranded DNA-binding protein of Deinococcus radiodurans: a biophysical characterization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 21: 1662-1670.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Olszewski M, Mickiewicz M, Kur J: Two highly thermostable paralogous single-stranded DNA-binding proteins from Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis. Arch Microbiol. 2008, 190: 79-87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dąbrowski S, Olszewski M, Piątek R, Kur J: Novel thermostable ssDNA-binding proteins from Thermus thermophilus and T. aquaticus - expression and purification. Protein Expr Purif. 2002, 26: 131-138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Filipkowski P, Duraj-Thatte A, Kur J: Novel thermostable single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) from Deinococcus geothermalis. Arch Microbiol. 2006, 186: 129-137.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Filipkowski P, Duraj-Thatte A, Kur J: Identification, cloning, expression, and characterization of a highly thermostable single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) from Deinococcus murrayi. Protein Expr Purif. 2007, 53: 201-208.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Filipkowski P, Koziatek M, Kur J: A highly thermostable, homodimeric single-stranded DNA-binding protein from Deinococcus radiopugnans. Extremophiles. 2006, 10: 607-614.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Filipkowski P, Kur J: Identification and properties of the Deinococcus grandis and Deinococcus proteolyticus single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSB). Acta Biochim Pol. 2007, 54: 79-87.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wadsworth RI, White MF: Identification and properties of crenarchaeal single-stranded DNA binding protein from Sulfolobus solfataricus. Nucleic Acid Res. 2001, 29: 914-920.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Belkin S, Wirsen CO, Jannasch HW: A new sulfur-reducing, extremely thermophilic eubacterium from a submarine thermal vent. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986, 51: 1180-1185.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huber RJ, Langworthy TA, Konig H, Thomm M, Woese CR, Sleytr UB, Stetter KO: Thermotoga maritima sp. nov. represents a new genus of unique extremely thermophilic eubacteria growing up to 90°C. Arch Microbiol. 1986, 144: 324-333.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelson KE, Clayton RA, Gill SR, Gwinn ML, Dodson RJ, Haft DH, Hickey EK, Peterson JD, Nelson WC, Ketchum KA, McDonald L, Utterback TR, Malek JA, Linher KD, Garrett MM, Stewart AM, Cotton MD, Pratt MS, Phillips CA, Richardson D, Heidelberg J, Sutton GG, Fleischmann RD, Eisen JA, White O, Salzberg SL, Smith HO, Venter JC, Fraser CM: Evidence for lateral gene transfer between Archaea and bacteria from genome sequence of Thermotoga maritime. Nature. 1999, 399: 323-329.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindner C, Nijland R, van Hartskamp M, Bron S, Hamoen LW, Kuipers OP: Differential expression of two paralogous genes of Bacillus subtilis enconding single-stranded DNA binding protein. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 1097-1105.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Madden TL, Tatusov RL, Zhang J: Applications of network BLAST server. Methods Enzymol. 1996, 266: 131-141.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Raghunathan S, Kozlov AG, Lohman TM, Waksman G: Structure of the DNA binding domain of E. coli SSB bound to ssDNA. Nat Struct Biol. 2000, 7: 648-652.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. DiDonato M, Krishna SS, Schwarzenbacher R, McMullan D, Jaroszewski L, Miller MD, Abdubek P, Agarwalla S, Ambing E, Axelrod H, Biorac T, Chiu HJ, Deacon AM, Elsliger MA, Feuerhelm J, Godzik A, Grittini C, Grzechnik SK, Hale J, Hampton E, Haugen J, Hornsby M, Klock HE, Knuth MW, Koesema E, Kreusch A, Kuhn P, Lesley SA, Moy K, Nigoghossian E, Okach L, Paulsen J, Quijano K, Reyes R, Rife C, Spraggon G, Stevens RC, van den Bedem H, Velasquez J, White A, Wolf G, Xu Q, Hodgson KO, Wooley J, Wilson IA: Crystal structure of a single-stranded DNA-binding protein (TM0604) from Thermotoga maritima at 2.60 A resolution. Proteins. 2006, 63: 256-260.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Huson DH, Richter DC, Rausch C, Dezulian T, Franz M, Rupp R: Dendroscope: An interactive viewer for large phylogenetic trees. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007, 8: 460-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Atrazhev A, Zhang S, Grosse F: Single-stranded DNA binding protein from calf thymus. Purification, properties, and stimulation of the homologous DNA-polymerase-α-primase complex. Eur J Biochem. 1992, 210: 855-865.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rudolf R, Böhm G, Lilie H, Jaenicke R: Folding proteins. In Protein Function: a Practical Approach. Edited by: Creighton TE. 1996, Oxford: IRL PressGoogle Scholar
  28. Curth U, Greipel J, Urbanke C, Maass G: Multiple binding modes of the single-stranded DNA binding protein from Escherichia coli as detected by tryptophan fluorescence and site-directed mutagenesis. Biochemistry. 1993, 32: 2585-2591.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwarz G, Watanabe F: Thermodynamics and kinetics of cooperative protein-nucleic acid binding. I. General aspects of analysis of data. J Mol Biol. 1983, 163: 467-484.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Raghunathan S, Ricard CS, Lohman TM, Waksman G: Crystal structure of the homo-tetrameric DNA binding domain of Escherichia coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein determined by multiwavelength x-ray diffraction on the selenomethionyl protein at 2.9-Å resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 6652-6657.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sali A, Blundell TL: Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J Mol Biol. 1993, 234: 779-815.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Li WF, Zhou XX, Lu P: Structural features of thermozymes. Biotechnol Adv. 2005, 23: 271-281.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Vieille C, Burdette DS, Zeikus JG: Thermozymes. Biotechnol Annu Rev. 1996, 2: 1-83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ladenstein R, Antranikian G: Proteins from hyperthermophiles: stability and enzymatic catalysis close to the boiling point of water. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 1998, 61: 37-85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Russell RJM, Ferguson JM, Hough DW, Danson MJ, Taylor GL: The crystal structure of citrate synthase from the hyperthermophilic Archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus at 19 angstrom resolution. Biochemist. 1997, 36: 9983-94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Lawrence MC, Colman PM: Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. J Mol Biol. 1993, 234: 946-950.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K: VMD - Visual Molecular Dynamics. J Molec Graphics. 1996, 14: 33-38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Rother K, Preissner R, Goede A, Froemmel C: Inhomogeneous molecular density: reference packing densities and distribution of cavities within proteins. Bioinformatics. 2003, 19: 2112-2121.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Olszewski et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.