Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Development of dengue virus replicons expressing HIV-1 gp120 and other heterologous genes: a potential future tool for dual vaccination against dengue virus and HIV

BMC Microbiology20011:28

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-1-28

©  Pang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001

Received: 24 September 2001

Accepted: 13 November 2001

Published: 13 November 2001

Abstract

Background

Toward the goals of providing an additional vector to add to the armamentarium available to HIV vaccinologists and of creating a bivalent vaccine effective against dengue virus and HIV, we have attempted to create vectors which express dengue virus non-structural proteins and HIV immunogens. Previously we reported the successful construction of dengue virus replicons which lack structural genes necessary for virion release and spreading infection in culture but which can replicate intracellularly and abundantly produce dengue non-structural proteins. Here we attempted to express heterologous genetic material from these replicons.

Results

We cloned into a Δpre-M/E dengue virus replicon genes for either green fluorescent protein (GFP), HIV gp160 or HIV gp120 and tested the ability of these constructs to express dengue virus proteins as well as the heterologous proteins in tissue culture after transfection of replicon RNA.

Conclusions

Heterologous proteins were readily expressed from these constructs. GFP and gp120 demonstrated minimal or no toxicity. Gp160 expressing replicons were found to express proteins abundantly at 36 hours post transfection, but after 50 hrs of transfection, few replicon positive cells could be found despite the presence of cellular debris positive for replicon proteins. This suggested that gp160 expressed from dengue virus replicons is considerably more toxic than either GFP or gp120. The successful expression of heterologous proteins, including HIV gp120 for long periods in culture suggests this vector system may be useful as a vaccine vector, given appropriate delivery methods.

Keywords

Green Fluorescent ProteinHeterologous GeneDengue Hemorrhagic FeverPost TransfectionAntibody Dependent Enhancement

Background

Despite tremendous progress in developing anti-retroviral drugs to combat HIV, there remains a need for an effective HIV vaccine. This need is particularly pressing in third world countries, where demographics and economics make drug therapy difficult to deliver. Although HIV infection elicits neutralizing antibodies and a cellular immune response against the virus [reviewed in [1] &[2]] and there exist "exposed uninfected" (EU) individuals that appear to have acquired resistance to infection by HIV [3, 4], the hallmark of HIV infection is the almost universal inability of humans to mount an immune response that can prevent the eventual development of AIDS.

An effective vaccine will require not only the design of effective immunogens, but also the design of optimized protocols of immunogen delivery. As a live, attenuated vaccine for HIV is considered difficult to test and dangerous to implement [1, 2, 5–9], various alternatives to HIV could be considered as potential "live" vectors for HIV immunogens, including enteric bacteria, poxviruses (vaccinia and canarypox), small RNA viruses (e.g. poliovirus and Semliki Forest virus), Rhabdoviruses (e.g. vesicular stomatitis virus), DNA viruses (e.g. adenovirus and adeno-associated viruses) and even naked DNA to achieve expression in living host cells [2, 10].

Dengue possesses several advantages which favor its choice as a vector for HIV immunogens. As a flavivirus, it replicates entirely in the cytoplasm through RNA directed RNA polymerization and is incapable of integrating into the host genome. Flavivirus replicons can replicate inside cells and achieve prolonged expression of high levels of virally encoded proteins with minimal toxicity [11, 12] and are unable to recombine or mutate to produce infectious HIV particles. Finally, by eliciting an immune reaction against the dengue non-structural proteins remaining in replicons, dengue virus replicons may induce a protective immunity against dengue which would not predispose vaccinated individuals to DHF. Properly administered, dengue virus replicons expressing HIV epitopes might thus serve as dual vaccines, conferring protection against dengue virus as well as HIV.

The challenges in developing a safe and effective HIV vaccine are many and varied. Choice of immunogen is clearly problematic. Critical epitopes may be masked by glycosyl groups and/or tertiary structure [13–15] and [16] The extensive genetic variability of HIV complicates immunogen choice and the high rate of mutation increases the likelihood of the rapid development of resistance. Furthermore, the method of immunogen delivery (e.g. purified subunits or inactivated virus vs. various forms of "live" expression) can determine the relative nature and extent of humoral and cell mediated immunologic responses. Priming with various types of "live" expression followed by boosting with purified subunits is currently favored as a method to obtain stronger immunologic responses that either method alone [reviewed in [1] and [2]]. Previously acquired immunity to a viral vector such as vaccinia may influence its efficacy in inducing immunity against heterologous proteins being delivered [16–19] and it may be wise to provide physicians with HIV vaccines based on a variety of vectors to handle a variety of clinical situations.

The use of live dengue as a vaccine or as a vector for heterologous immunogens has historically been considered problematic because of the pathologies associated with dengue infection. Although dengue fever (DF) is usually self limited, dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) is considerably debilitating and frequently fatal [20]. However, DHF is unlikely to result from or be promoted by the vectors reported here. The enhanced replication of virus seen in dengue hemorrhagic fever is generally seen upon reinfection by dengue virus of a serotype different from previous infections and is believed to be mediated by antibodies against viral structural proteins: so called antibody dependent enhancement of infection, or ADE. These cross reacting antibodies actually promote viral uptake by macrophages [21, 22]. The main challenge in using live dengue in humans is thus avoiding the development of antibody dependent enhancement(ADE) of infection by antibodies against the pre-M and E proteins of one dengue strain which weakly cross react with the pre-M and E of a second infecting dengue strain. Since the replicons reported here lack the major viral structural protein genes, they are not only incapable of sustaining a spreading infection but also are incapable of eliciting antibodies against the missing structural proteins. They should neither induce DF nor promote DHF.

Dengue virus has a typical flavivirus genome structure, as described in Figure 1. The structural proteins, C, pre-M (M) and E, are involved in packaging, export and subsequent entry. The non-structural proteins, NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B and NS5 include an RNA-directed RNA polymerase and a protease function involved in cleaving certain positions of the long viral polyprotein which contains all the viral genes [23, 24]. The four serotypes of dengue virus ("1" through "4") share approximately 60%-74% amino acid residue identity with one another in the E gene [25] and induce cross-reacting antibodies [26].
Figure 1
Figure 1

Construction of wild type dengue virus and dengue virus replicon vectors used in these studies. The diagram at the top represents the wild type dengue virus genome.

Two strategies suggest themselves for circumventing the problem of ADE from dengue vaccination. One strategy is to immunize with multiple strains of dengue virus to elicit high affinity, neutralizing antibodies against the multiple dengue serotypes. At least one vaccine to do this (using dengue vaccine candidates, DEN-1 PDK13, DEN-2 PDK53, DEN-3 PGMK 30/F3, and DEN-4 PDK48) has been in clinical trials [27, 28]. A second strategy is to induce immunity only to viral proteins other than pre-M and E. Several studies have shown that the nonstructural glycoprotein NS1 can play an important role in protection against dengue. Mice immunized with purified dengue-2 NS1 protein injected intramuscularly and boosted after 3 days and two weeks were protected from developing lethal dengue encephalitis upon subsequent challenge with dengue 2 virus. [29]. Similarly, mice immunized with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing authentic NS1 [30] were protected against the development of dengue-4 virus encephalitis when challenged by intracerebral injection. Inoculation of mice with specific combinations of monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) directed against dengue-2 NS1 [31] also protects against lethal virus encephalitis upon intracerebral dengue-2 challenge. Other nonstructural proteins are also immunogenic and may participate in eliciting protection [32].

Previously we have reported the successful construction of several dengue virus replicons which replicate intracellularly without the pre-M and E proteins required to form infectious virions, including one replicon which can be expressed from transfected DNA [12]. Towards the goal of devising a "live" dual vaccine based on only non-structural dengue proteins and heterologous HIV material, we report here that these replicons can be harnessed to express heterologous genes, including HIV gp160 and gp120. Upon introduction into a host's cells, these sub-genomic fragments should replicate intracellularly and support prolonged expression of dengue and heterologous immunogens without producing the deleted dengue structural proteins and without forming infectious virions.

Results

In various previous attempts to express heterologous genes in full length, wild type dengue virus, we experienced a very poor success rate, despite attempts to clone heterologous material into various positions of the genome (data not shown). Our first efforts to determine whether or not heterologous material could be readily expressed in dengue replicons was to clone the comparatively tractable green fluorescent protein (GFP) into the Δpre-M/E replicon, into the position from which the pre-M and E genes had been deleted (Figure 1). GFP was readily visualized in cultures 48 hours post transfection with Δpre-M/E-GFP, as seen in Figure 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) by Δpre-M/E-GFP 48 hours post transfection.

Encouraged by the success with GFP, we next looked at Δpre-M/E replicons with HIV-1 env material cloned into the position of the deleted pre-M and E genes. We analyzed two clones, Δpre-M/E-gp120 and Δpre-M/E-gp160, expressing HIV-1 gp120 and gp160 respectively (Figure 1). Expression of genes in the Δpre-M/E-gp120 replicon was reproducibly visualized at 48–50 hours post transfection (Figures 3 &4), at a level of approximatley 1% of the cells, but in many experiments, the corresponding cultures transfected with the gp160 replicon, Δpre-M/E-gp160, either no fluorescence could be visualized (not shown), or only fluorescent cells with a bizarre morphology (characterized by debris and/or degenerative appearance) could be visualized (Figure 5). However, when we harvested cultures earlier, at 36 hours post transfection with Δpre-M/E-gp160, intact, fluorescing cells were readily found, though the morphology still appeared atypical compared to either that of cultures transfected with wild type dengue virus and dengue replicons [12] or the Δpre-M/E-gp120 replicon (see Figure 6).
Figure 3
Figure 3

Expression of proteins by Δpre-M/E-gp120 50 hours post transfection. Left and right frames are two independent fields. Anti-dengue serum was used in these experiments.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Expression of proteins by Δpre-M/E-gp120 48 hours post transfection. Left and right frames are two independent fields. Anti-HIV serum was used in these experiments.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Expression of gp160 by Δpre-M/E-gp160 48 hours post transfection. Left and right frames are independent fields. Anti-HIV serum was used in these experiments.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Expression of gp160 by Δpre-M/E-gp160 36 hours post transfection. Anti-dengue Serum was used in these experiments. Left and right panels are independent fields.

To serve as effective vaccines, it is preferable, if not necessary, that expression systems be capable of expressing immunogens for longer than a couple of days. Although we knew from previous experiments [12] that dengue replicons could survive for at least 7 days in culture, the limited durability of cells transfected with gp160-expressing replicons raised the question of whether or not cells transfected with Δpre-M/E-gp120 replicons could survive for similarly long times in culture. When cultures transfected with Δpre-M/E-gp120 were trypsinized and replated on day 7 post transfection and then analyzed on day 9 post transfection, fluorescent cells were readily visualized (Figure 7). In comparison to cultures that were not trypsinized on day 7 post transfection however, these cultures had fewer intact fluorescent cells and more debris (not shown). Although this suggests that gp120 expression from a dengue replicon stresses cells, we did find fields with adjacent, gp120 positive cells, suggesting that at least one cell division between day 7 and day 9 had occurred in a cell successfully transfected with Δpre-M/E-gp120 (Figure 7, right panel). A 9 days of culture post transfection with Δpre-M/E-gp120, only about 0.1% of the cells or less were positive (not shown), which represents a considerable decrease from 48 hours post transfection.
Figure 7
Figure 7

Expression of proteins by Δpre-M/E-gp120 9 days post transfection. Cells were trypsinized and replated on day 7 post transfection and harvested for immunofluorescence two days later. Left and right frames are two independent fields. Anti-dengue serum was used in these experiments.

In the experiments described above and in Figures 3 through 7, expression of dengue replicons with heterologous material from HIV was followed either using anti-HIV sera or anti-dengue sera, depending on the experiment. To demonstrate that the same cells were expressing both dengue proteins and HIV proteins, we used a double label technique, with FITC detecting HIV proteins and rhodamine detecting dengue proteins. Figure 8 demonstrates the concordance of dengue virus protein and gp120 expression in cultures 4 days post transfection with Δpre-M/E-gp120, (Figure 8). The more extensive background of auto fluorescence encountered when visualizing the rhodamine fluorescence makes low levels of specific rhodamine fluorescence more difficult to discern, but clearly all intact cells positive for HIV are also positive for dengue proteins. The rhodamine-positive spot in the lower left of the panel is cellular debris and is also positive for dengue proteins, but the FITC fluorescence was not well reproduced by digital photography, though it still may be visualized on certain monitor/computer combinations. Similar results were obtained at 7 days post transfection (Figure 9).
Figure 8
Figure 8

Simultaneous expression of HIV and dengue proteins by Δpre-M/E-gp120-transfected cells 4 days post transfection. Left frame: FITC detection of HIV proteins. Right frame: Rhodamine detection of dengue proteins.

Figure 9
Figure 9

Simultaneous expression of HIV and dengue proteins by Δpre-M/E-gp120-transfected cells 7 days post transfection. Left frame: FITC detection of HIV proteins. Right frame: Rhodamine detection of dengue proteins.

Discussion

Our finding that dengue virus replicons can express heterologous genes, including HIV envelop, for prolonged periods of time in cell culture without selection represents a significant step in developing a new vector system potentially capable of delivering immunogens to any host in whose cells the dengue replicons can replicate. Flavivirus replicons have previously been demonstrated to express heterologous genes for up to 41 days in tissue culture in Kunjin [11]. However, these experiments were done in the presence of selection for the heterologous genes cloned into the replicons. We have demonstrated heterologous gene expression in the absence of selection for up to at least 9 days post transfection with chimeric dengue replicons. Although we have formally demonstrated expression, not replication, our previous demonstration of the replication [12] of dengue replicons lacking heterologous material suggests that the replicons described here, which contain heterologous material, are indeed replicating. Evidence that cells continue to replicate and express replicon proteins in both daughter cells after transfection with these chimeric replicons further supports the implication of chimeric replicon replication. Ideally, to serve as dual vaccines against dengue as well as against other pathogens, the replicons should express the dengue NS1 protein [29–32]. So far, attempts to visualize NS1 production by Western blots have failed, presumably because of the low transfection efficiencies. However, we have previously argued that the replication of dengue replicons could not take place in the absence of the essential non-structural gene, NS1, which implies that NS1 is being made. The frequencies and fluorescence intensities of replicon positive cells seen in the experiments reported here are comparable to those seen for dengue replicons lacking heterologous material [12], suggesting that replication of the Δpre-M/E replicons containing heterologous material is occurring as well. The finding of at least one closely apposed pair of cells expressing high levels of replicon proteins on day 9 post transfection, two days after trypsinization and replating (Figure 7, right panel), not only implies replicon replication, but also implies the expression of NS-1 protein as well. The definitive demonstration of effective NS-1 production will have to await studies of the immune response in animals immunized with these replicons.

Choice of immunogen remains problematic for these vectors. Clearly, HIV-1 gp160 is too toxic for prolonged expression. Even the gp120-expressing replicon seems mildly toxic in that the frequency of gp120 positive cells declines with time in culture post transfection with Δpre-M/E-gp120 (not shown). However, as noted above, we have seen at least one instance of putative cellular division at least 7 days after being successfully transfected by Δpre-M/E-gp120 (Figure 7, right panel). Experiments are now in progress to determine the feasibility of long term expression of other HIV-1 immunogens, including gag and tat.

Conclusion

Demonstration of long term protein expression by a gp120-expressing replicon alone, of course, does not demonstrate that the chimeric dengue replicons constitute an effective vaccine. However, at the very least they add to the potential armamentarium available to the vaccinologist. It is highly likely that a successful HIV vaccination protocol will involve multiple immunogens and delivery protocols. For instance, mice immunized with attenuated Friend leukemia virus (FLV) develop an immune response whose efficacy is dependent on the additive effects of at least three separable spleen cell populations [33]. By analogy, it may be necessary to devise multiple strategies to obtain a similarly complex and effective immune response in humans against HIV. In animal models of HIV, different immunogens and modes of immunization can induce different modes of protection with varying degrees of effectiveness [34–40] Harnessing multiple immune responses may be the answer to designing an effective HIV vaccine [1] and the availability of multiple vectors may facilitate the harnessing of multiple responses.

Much work obviously remains to be done to develop dengue replicons as effective vectors for HIV immunogens. More work needs to be done on determining the ability of dengue replicons to express other potential immunogens, including HIV-1 gag, tat (reviewed in 41) and env genes with deleted hypervariable regions [see [42]]. Animal studies in our lab are currently being initiated to determine the nature of the immune response such vectors can induce in mice and these studies will presumably need to be extended to primates. Finally, effective delivery systems will need to be devised. Although our successful development of a plasmid which can express a dengue replicon from transfected DNA facilitates delivery by DNA vaccination [12], the development of packaging cell lines which can package these replicons into virions would be a major step forward towards a vaccine which could be conveniently administered in typical clinical situations. Experiments are currently underway in our laboratory to develop such packaging cell lines.

Materials and methods

Culturing of dengue Virus

Dengue virus strains DEN1/WP and DEN2/NGC, kindly provided by Dr. Lewis Markoff, [43, 44] were passaged in monkey LLC-MK2 cells at 37°C in a humidified incubator under 5% CO2, using Medium 199 plus 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 50 ug of Gentamicin per ml. The cells were trypsinized a day before virus infection and plated to reach approximately 80% confluence on the day of infection. Infections were typically at an MOI of 0.01 PFU/cell in Medium 199 plus 2% FBS.

In vitro mutagenesis

Heterologous genes were cloned into the previously described Δpre-M/E replicon [12], into the position previously occupied by the pre-M/E genes. DNA fragments used for desired regions of heterologous genes (see Figure 1) were synthesized by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from short overlapping primers. For the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) gene, the 5' primer was 5'CGAAAAAAGGCGAGAAATACGCCTTTCAATATGCTGAAACGCGAGAGAATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAGCTG3' and the 3' primer was 5'AAGGTCAAAATTCAACAGCTGCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCC3'. For HIV-1 gp120 gene, the 5' primer was 5'ATCATTATGCTGAATCCAACAGTGATGGCGTTCCATTTACCACACGTAACATGAGAGTGATGGGGATCAGGAAG3' and the 3' primer was 5'AAGGTCAAAATTCAACAGCTGGGTGGGTGCTAATCCTAATGGTTC3'. GFP and HIV-1 gp120 were fused with FMDV/2A self cleaving protein sequence to replace natural cleavage sites in the dengue polyprotein. These sites seem to loose their activity when juxtaposed with heterologous material (data not shown). PCR was used to amplify DNA coding for the FMDV/2A self cleaving protein The 5' primer was 5'CAGCTGTTGAATTTTGACCTTCTTAAGCTTGCGGGAGACGTCGAGTCCAACCCTGGCCCC3' and the 3' primer was 5'ATACAGCGTCACGACTCCCACCAATACTAGTGACACAGACAGTGAGGTGCTGGGGCCAGGGTTGGACTCGAC.

Dengue-2 virus cDNA cloned in the yeast shuttle vector pRS424, linearized by excision of a short Bam H1 fragment was transfected into competent [45] S. cerevisiae YPH857 (kindly provided by Barry Falgout, (CBER/FDA), along with the appropriate PCR fragment spanning the desired deletion. Yeast colonies which grew on tryptophan minus plates represented vectors which had recircularized by homologous recombination with these PCR fragments [35]. DNA from these colonies was transformed into E. coli STBL 2 cells (Life Technologies, Inc.) to make sufficient quantities of dengue recombinant, genomic-length DNAs for characterization and analysis.

Expression of virus & replicons in cells

The full length virus and replicon cDNA plasmids isolated from STBL 2 cells were linearized with Sac I, purified by Qiagen chromatography, and eluted by RNAase-free water in preparation for transcription. The transcription reaction mixtures contained lug of linearized DNA; 0.5 mM(each) ATP, CTP, and UTP; 0.1 mM GTP; 0.5 mM cap analog (NEBL); 10 mM DTT; 40 U of Rnasin (Promega); 30 U of SP6 RNA polymerase; and 1 × SP6 RNA polymerase buffer (Promega) in a volume of 30 ul. The reaction mixtures were incubated at 400°C for 2 hr. Aliquots (12.5 ul) of the reaction mixtures, containing full length viral RNA, were used to transfect approximately 2 × 106 Monkey LLC-MK2 cells in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) by electroporation in a 0.4 cm gap electroporation cuvette. Each cuvette was pulsed at 200 V, 950 uF using a BioRad Genepuls electroporator. The cells were then resuspended in growth medium and plated on the appropriate tissue culture dish.

After electroporation, cells were either plated directly on multiwell plates for harvest at short time periods (typically 4 days or less) or on tissue culture dishes for trypsinization and seeding onto multiwell plates one or two days before final harvest for longer time periods.

Immuno-histochemical methods

For immunofluorescent detection of dengue-specific proteins, cells growing on chamber slides were rinsed in room-temperature PBS and then fixed in cold acetone for 10 min at -20°C. After being air dried, each chamber was covered with 50 ul of a 1:50 dilution of DEN2-specific hyperimmune mouse ascitic fluid (HMAF, American Type Culture Collection) in PBS plus 2% normal goat serum and incubated at room temperature for 1 h in a humidified atmosphere and then rinsed twice in PBS. After washing, cells were subsequently incubated with a 1:100 dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeld goat anti-mouse antibodies (Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratory) and rinsed twice in PBS. For detection of HIV-specific proteins, the same protocol was used except that cells were initially incubated with human HIV-1 serum from Waldheim Pharmazeutika Ges.m.b.H. Neufeld-Vienna, Austria and then subsequently incubated with fluorescent-labeled goat anti-human antibody. Cells in some, but not all experiments were counterstained with 0.02% Evans Blue.

For dual labeling, the first antibodies were a 1:50 dilution of dengue type 2 specific hyperimmune mouse ascitic fluid (HMAF, American type culture collection) and a 1:100 dilution of human HIV positive serum in PBS plus 2% normal goat serum. The second antibodies were a 1:100 dilution of FITC-labeled goat anti-human antibodies (Waldeim Pharmazeutika) and a 1:50 dilution of goat anti-mouse IgG-L-Rhodamine (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals).

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Owen Wood for help with immunofluorescence photomicrography.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Molecular Virology, Division of Emerging and Transfusion Transmitted Diseases, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA, Bethesda, USA

References

  1. Nathanson N, Mathieson BJ: Biological Considerations in the Development of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Vaccine. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2000, 182: 579-589. 10.1086/315707.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cho MW: Assessment of HIV Vaccine Development: Past, Present, and Future. Advances in Pharmacology. 2000, 49: 263-314.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Clerici M, Giorgi JV, Chou CC: Cell-mediated immune response to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 in seronegative homosexual men with recent sexual exposure to HIV-1. J Infect Dis. 1992, 165: 1012-1019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaul R, Kimani J, Dong T: Late seroconversion in HIV "resistant" Nairobi prostitutes is associated with a preceding decrease in HIV exposure. [abstract 489]. In: Program and abstracts of the 7th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (San Francisco). San Francisco: Foundation for Retrovirology and Human Health,. 2000, 168-Google Scholar
  5. Baba TW, Liska V, Khimani AH, Ray NB, Dailey PJ, Penninck D, Bronson R, Greene MF, McClure HM, Martin LN, Ruprecht RM: Live attenuated, multiply deleted simian immunodeficiency virus causes AIDS in infant and adult macaques. Nat. Med. 1999, 5: 194-203. 10.1038/8859.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baba TW, Jeong YS, Pennick D, Bronson R, Greene MF, Ruprecht RM: Pathogenicity of live, attenuated SIV after mucosal infection of neonatal macaques. Science. 1995, 267: 1820-1825.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogers WM, Niphuis H, ten Haaft P, Laman JD, Koornstra W, Heeney JL: Protection from HIV-1 envelope-bearing chimeric simian immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) in rhesus macaques infected with attenuated SIV: Consequences of challenge. AIDS. 1995, 9: F13-F18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenough TC, Sullivan JL, Desrosiers RC: Declining CD4 T-cell counts in a person infected with nef-deleted HIV-1. N. Engl. J. Med,. 1999, 340: 236-237. 10.1056/NEJM199901213400314.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkhout B, Verhoef K, van Wamel JL, Back NK: Genetic instability of live, attenuated human immunodeficiency virus type 1 vaccine strains. J. Virol. 1999, 73: 1138-1145.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rose NF, Marx PA, Luckay A, Nixon DF, Moretto WJ, Donahoe SM, Montefiori D, Roberts A, Buonocore L, Rose JK: An Effective AIDS Vaccine Based on Live Attenuated Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Recombinants. Cell. 2001, 106: 539-549.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Khromykn AA, Westaway ED: Sub-genomic replicons of the flavivirus Kunjin: construction and applications. J. Virol. 1997, 71(2): 1497-1505.Google Scholar
  12. Pang X, Zhang M, Dayton AI: Development of dengue virus type 2 replicons capable of prolonged expression in host cells. BMC Microbiology. 2001, 1: 18-10.1186/1471-2180-1-18.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Reitter J, Means R, Desrosiers RC: A role for carbohydrates in immune evasion in AIDS. Nat Med. 1998, 4: 679-684.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chan DC, Kim PS: HIV entry and its inhibition. Cell. 1998, 93: 681-684.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. LaCasse RA, Follis KE, Trahey M: Fusion-competent vaccines: broad neutralization of primary isolates of HIV. Science. 1999, 283: 357-362. 10.1126/science.283.5400.357.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooney EL, Collier AC, Greenberg PD, Coombs RW, Zarling J, Arditti DE, Hoffman MC, Hu SL, Corey L: Safety of and immunological response to a recombinant vaccinia virus vaccine expressing HIV envelope glycoprotein. Lancet. 1991, 337(8741): 567-572. 10.1016/0140-6736(91)91636-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooney EL, McElrath MJ, Corey L, Hu SL, Collier AC, Arditti D, Hoffman M, Coombs RW, Smith GE, Greenberg PD: Enhanced immunity to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope elicited by a combined vaccine regimen consisting of priming with a vaccinia recombinant expressing HIV envelope and boosting with gp160 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90(5): 1882-1886.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham BS, Belshe RB, Clements ML, Dolin R, Corey L, Wright PF, Gorse GJ, Midthun K, Keefer MC, Roberts NJ: Vaccination of vaccinia-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp160 recombinant vaccinia virus in a blinded, controlled, randomized clinical trial. The AIDS Vaccine Clinical Trials Network. J Infect Dis. 1992, 166(2): 244-52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. McElrath MJ, Corey L, Berger D, Hoffman MC, Klucking S, Dragavon J, Peterson E, Greenberg PD: Immune responses elicited by recombinant vaccinia-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) envelope and HIV envelope protein: analysis of the durability of responses and effect of repeated boosting. J Infect Dis. 1994, 169(1): 41-47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Monath TP: Dengue: the risk to developed and developing countries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994, 91: 2395-2400.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Morens DM: Antibody-dependent enhancement of infection and the pathogenesis of viral disease. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1994, 19: 500-512.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Halstead SB: Pathogenesis of dengue: Challenges to molecular biology. Science. 1988, 239: 476-481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chambers TJ, Chang HS, Galler R, Rice CM: Flavivirus Genome Organization, Expression and Replication. Ann Rev Microbiol. 1990, 44: 649-6888. 10.1146/annurev.micro.44.1.649.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Rice CM: Flaviviridae: the virus and their replication. In: Fields Virology 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa. Lippincott-Raven Publishers,. 1996, 931-996.Google Scholar
  25. Thomas CJ, Hahn CS, Galler R, Rice CM: Flavivirus genome organization, expression, and replication. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1990, 44: 649-88. 10.1146/annurev.micro.44.1.649.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Heinz FX: Epitope mapping of flavivirus glycoproteins. Adv Virus Res. 1986, 31: 103-168.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bhamarapravati N, Sutee Y: Live attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine. Vaccine. 2000, 18 Suppl 2: 44-47. 10.1016/S0264-410X(00)00040-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kanesa-thasan N, Sun W, Kim-Ahn G, Van Albert S, Putnak JR, King A, Raengsakulsrach B, Christ-Schmidt H, Gilson K, Zahradnik JM, Vaughn I, Innis BL, Saluzzo JF, Hoke CH: Safety and immunogenicity of attenuated dengue virus vaccines (Aventis Pasteur) in human volunteers. Vaccine. 2001, 19(23-24): 3179-3188. 10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00020-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Schlesinger JJ, Brandriss MW, Walsh EE: Immunization with the dengue 2 virus nonstructural glycoprotein NS1. J. Gen. Virol. 1987, 68: 853-857.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Falgout B, Bray M, Schlesinger JJ, Lai C-J: Immunization of Mice with recombinant vaccinia virus expressing authentic dengue virus nonstructural protein NS1 protects against lethal dengue virus encephalitis. J. Virol. 1990, 64(9): 4356-4363.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Henchal EA, Henchal LS, Schlesinger JJ: Synergistic interactions of anti-NS1 monoclonal antibodies protect passively immunized mice from lethal challenge with dengue 2 virus. J Gen Virol. 1988, 69 (Pt 8): 2101-2107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Brinton MA, Kurane I, Mathew A, Zeng L, Shi PY, Rothman A, Ennis FA: Immune mediated and inherited defenses against flaviviruses. Clin Diagn Virol. 1998, 10(2-3): 129-39. 10.1016/S0928-0197(98)00039-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Dittmer U, Brooks DM, Hasenkrug KJ: Protection against establishment of retro viral persistence by vaccination with a live attenuated virus. J Virol. 1999, 73: 3753-3757.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Heeney J, Akerblom L, Barnett S: HIV-1 vaccine-induced immune responses which correlate with protection from SHIV infection: compiled preclinical efficacy data from trials with ten different HIV-1 vaccine candidates. Immunol Lett. 1999, 66: 189-95. 10.1016/S0165-2478(98)00157-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hirsch V, Fuerst T, Sutter G: Patterns of viral replication correlate with outcome in simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected macaques: effect of prior immunization with a trivalent SIV vaccine in modified vaccinia virus Ankara. J Virol. 1996, 70: 3741-3752.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Quesada-Rolander M, Makitalo B, Thorstensson R: Protection against mucosal SIVsm challenge in macaques infected with a chimeric SIV that expresses HIV type 1 envelope. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 1996, 12: 993-999.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Letvin NL, Montefiori D, Yasutami Y: Potent, protective anti-HIV immune response generated by bimodal HIV envelope DNA plus protein vaccination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 9378-383. 10.1073/pnas.94.17.9378.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller CJ, McChesney MB, Lu X: Rhesus macaques previously infected with simian/human immunodeficiency virus are protected from vaginal challenge with pathogenic SIVmac239. J Virol. 1997, 71: 1911-1921.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Shibata R, Siemon C, Czajak SC: Live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus vaccines elicit potent resistance against a challenge with a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 chimeric virus. J Virol. 1997, 71: 8141-8148.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gundlach B, Reiprich S, Sopper S: Env-independent protection induced by live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus vaccines. J Virol. 1998, 72: 7846-7251.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Girard M, Habel A, Chanel C: New prospects for the development of a vaccine against human immunodeficiency virus type 1. An overview. C R Acad Sci III. 1999, 322(11): 959-966.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Barnett SW, Lu S, Srivastava I, Cherpelis S, Gettie A, Blanchard J, Wang S, Mboudjeka I, Leung L, Lian Y, Fong A, Buckner C, Ly A, Hilt S, Ulmer J, Wild CT, Mascola JR, Stamatatos L: The ability of an oligomeric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope antigen to elicit neutralizing antibodies against primary HIV-1 isolates is improved following partial deletion of the second hypervariable region. J Virol. 2001, 75(12): 5526-5540. 10.1128/JVI.75.12.5526-5540.2001.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Polo S, Ketner G, Levis R, Falgout B: Infectious RNA Transcripts from full-length dengue virus type 2 cDNA clones made in Yeast. J Virol. 1997, 71(7): 5366-5374.PubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Pur B, Polo S, Hayes CG, Falgout B: Construction of a full length infection clone for dengue-1 virus western pacific 74 strain. Virus Genes. 2000, 20(1): 57-63. 10.1023/A:1008160123754.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Spencer F, Ketner G, Connelly C, Hieter P: Targeted recombination-based cloning and manipulation of large DNA segments in yeast. Methods Companion Methods Enzymol. 1993, 5: 161-175. 10.1006/meth.1993.1021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Pang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2001

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.

Advertisement

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us