Skip to main content
Download PDF

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of urinary tract infections causing bacterial isolates and associated risk factors among HIV patients in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia

BMC Microbiology volume 24, Article number: 148 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Urinary tract infections, a prevalent global infectious disease, are clinical issues not well studied in HIV-positive individuals. UTIs have become a global drug resistance issue, but the prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of UTI-causing bacteria among HIV patients in Tigray, Ethiopia, are poorly understood. This study aims to identify the prevalence of UTI-causing bacteria, their antibiotic susceptibility patterns, and associated risk factors in HIV patients attending ART clinics at Mekelle General Hospital and Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.

Method

Clean-catch midstream urine samples (10–15 mL) were collected from HIV patients who are attending ART clinics at Mekelle General Hospital and Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. Samples were analyzed based on standard microbiological protocols using cysteine-lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) agar. Pure colonies of bacterial isolates were obtained by sub-culturing into Mac-Conkey, Manitol Salt agar and blood agar plates. The bacterial isolates were then identified using macroscopic, microscopic, biochemical, and Gram staining methods. Gram-negative bacteria were identified using biochemical tests like triple sugar iron agar, Simon’s citrate agar, lysine iron agar, urea, motility test, and indol test, whereas Gram-positive isolates were identified using catalase and coagulase tests. The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion technique was used to analyze the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 25.0.

Results

Among the 224 patients, 28 (12.5%) of them had been infected by UTIs-causing bacteria. E. coli was the dominant bacterium (16 (57%)) followed by K. pneumoniae (4 (14%)), and S. aureus (3 (11%)). Of the total bacterial isolates, 22 (78.6%) of them developed multi-drug resistance. All Gram-positive (100%) and 75% of Gram-negative bacterial isolates were found to be resistant to two or more drugs. Patients with a history of UTIs, and with CD4 count < 200 cells/ mm3, were more likely to have significant bacteriuria. Compared to male patients, female patients were more affected by the UTIs-causing bacteria. More than 93% of the UTIs-causing bacterial isolates were susceptible to nitrofurantoin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, and gentamycin; whereas they are highly resistant to ampicillin (96%), cotrimoxazole (82%) and tetracycline (71%).

Conclusions

Most of the bacterial isolates were highly resistant to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and tetracycline. Female patients were more affected by the UTIs causing bacteria. The highest prevalence (12.5%) of UTIs in HIV patients needs special attention for better management and monitoring. Previous UTI history and immune suppression are predictors of UTIs, highlighting the need for intervention measures involving molecular studies to identify resistant bacteria genes and promote patient immune reconstitution.

Peer Review reports

Background

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are significant quantities of microbial pathogens in the urinary tract, including urethra, bladder, ureters, kidneys, or prostate [1, 2]. UTIs are among the most common infectious diseases worldwide but are significantly understudied [3]. UTIs are one of the most common bacterial infections globally, with an estimated annual incidence of more than 150 million cases worldwide and costing the global economy more than 6 billion US dollars [4, 5].

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are prevalent clinical issues involving bacterial invasion and multiplication in the urinary tract system’s organs, accounting for 1–6% of medical referrals and affecting urinary tract, bladder, and kidney infections [6, 7]. It is the second most prevalent bacterial infection, affecting people of all ages all over the world [8]. Urinary tract infections (UTIs) remain to be one of the most common infectious diseases diagnosed in developing countries [9]. The burden of recurrent UTIs has both personal (social and psychological effects) and societal aspects (clinical and economic burden of the illness) which harm the quality of life [10].

As of 2022, over 80% of the 39 million HIV-infected individuals worldwide, including 1.8 million children, are from the WHO Africa region [11]. Despite increasing coverage, the UNAIDS goal of 95% coverage by 2025 remains unrealistic [12]. Investing in research, education, awareness campaigns, and access to ART, along with comprehensive HIV prevention techniques like pre-exposure prophylaxis, condoms, and safe sexual practices, is crucial for combating HIV [11].

People living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are more likely to develop urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to the suppression of their immunity [13]. Asymptomatic UTIs among HIV patients can progress to symptomatic ones characterized by mild irritation, bacteremia, sepsis, and death [13, 14]. UTIs among HIV patients can bring numerous health consequences, including acute and chronic kidney diseases, infertility, cancer, sepsis, and neurologic complication which could lead to urinary stasis [15]. HIV patients may face significant financial burden due to UTIs recurrence, expensive antimicrobials, extended hospital stays, adverse drug effects, and unsatisfactory therapeutic options, which may lead to further complications [4, 16].

Studies indicate a global increase in UTI prevalence in HIV/AIDS patients, ranging from 6.3 to 77.5% [4, 17, 18]. UTIs may lead to hospitalization of HIV-infected patients [13, 18]. Bacteria that cause UTIs among HIV patients include Escherichia coli, Enterococcus species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus species, Klebsiella species, and Staphylococcus aureus [19, 20] .

The emergence of antibiotic resistance is particularly enormous in developing countries [20]. This is because of having low-quality laboratory facilities to isolate pathogens and determine their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and due to the misuse of antimicrobials [20, 21]. Resistant bacteria are more difficult to treat even at higher doses [22, 23]. Ethiopian studies reveal a concerning rise in urinary tract infections (UTIs) due to the high drug resistance of isolated uropathogens [19, 24]. This has a significant impact on bacterial infection management, resulting in higher mortality, morbidity, and treatment costs [25, 26].

Studies from various corners of the globe have identified many risk factors associated with UTIs among patients with HIV. Patients with CD4+ cell count < 200 cells/mm3, HIV-positive females, and patients with conditions that may obstruct urine flow like enlarged prostate, congenital urinary tract abnormalities, and inflammation were cited as more likely to experience UTIs [27, 28]. Previous history of UTIs, current symptoms of UTIs, and previous history of catheterization were risk factors associated with UTIs cited among studies from Ethiopia [29].

Ethiopia has limited research on the extent of UTIs causing bacterial isolates and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in HIV-1 infected patients, with no published study in the selected study area. This study investigated the prevalence of UTIs caused by bacteriuria isolates, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and associated risk factors among HIV-infected patients in Tigray, Ethiopia, attending ART clinics.

Materials and methods

Study area

The study was conducted at Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (ACSH) and Mekelle General Hospital (MGH), Mekelle, northern Ethiopia. Mekelle is located 783 km to the north of Addis Ababa at an altitude and longitude of 13,029’N 39,028’E, respectively with an elevation of 2084 m above sea level. The city has a total population of 586,897 [30]. ACSH, governed by Mekelle University, is the largest hospital in the region with 450 beds, while MGH, governed by the Regional Health Bureau, has 166 beds.

These hospitals serve patients who come from all parts of the region (which comprises about 7 million people) and from Afar and Amhara Regional States. ACSH and MGH provide ART services for up to 1,550 and 4,495 patients, respectively.

Study design and period

Between February and June 2021, a cross-sectional study was conducted at health facilities.

Sampling technique and sample size determination

The sample size was determined using single proportion formula, N1 = Z2α/2 P (1- P)/d2, N1 was the initial sample size, with a 95% confidence level, an estimated prevalence of bacterial UTIs among HIV patients 15.8% (p = 0.158) [31], and a precision of 3% after considering the 10% non-response rate, N1 = 224 and, using the formula for proportionate allocation the sample size for each health facility (N2) was 57 and 167 in ACSH and MGH, respectively.

Source of study population

The study included all HIV-infected individuals, regardless of age, who visited ACSH and MGH’s ART clinics.

Recruitment criteria

The inclusion criteria for UTIs included symptomatic or asymptomatic presentations, being on ART or pre-ART, and having a history of UTIs. Patients who took antibiotics, including cotrimoxazole prophylaxis, but didn’t give consent two weeks before data collection and didn’t take their ART medications were excluded from the study.

Study variables

The prevalence of UTIs causing bacterial isolates and antibiotic susceptibility patterns were considered primary and secondary outcome variables. Socio-demographic characteristics including (age, gender, residence, marital status, occupation, and level of education) and Clinical characteristics briefly including a history of UTIs, symptoms of UTIs, previous history of catheterization, CD4+ cell count, and viral load level were predictor variables.

Data collection procedure

The study collected prospective data on the socio-demographic characteristics of patients using a structured questionnaire designed specifically for this purpose. The study also collected clinical data, including clinical history, CD4 + cell count, and viral load levels, retrospectively using standardized checklists, before incorporating socio-demographic data and urine sample collection.

Urine collection

An adequate explanation of how to collect the specimen was provided by trained professional personnel. Sterile, dry, wide-necked, and leak-proof containers were prepared for sample collection [32]. Containers were labeled with a unique sample number, date, and time of collection. Briefly, about 10 to 15 mL of clean-catch midstream urine sample was collected from each patient. The collected samples were delivered immediately to the College of Health Sciences Medical Microbiology Laboratory and processed within two hours [33].

Identification of bacterial isolates

Figure 1 shows the whole procedures summarized schematically. Briefly; 0.001 ml of well-mixed un-centrifuged urine was inoculated into cysteine-lactose electrolyte deficient (CLED) agar using a calibrated sterile wire loop (Oxoid, UK). It was aerobically incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h and examined for bacterial growth. About 3–5 pure colonies from the CLED agar were sub-cultured into Mac-Conkey agar (Oxoid, UK), blood agar plates and Manitol salt agar (MSA) incubated at 37 °C for 18–24 h to differentiate and select our isolates of interest. If bacterial isolates were grown from the urine samples (≥ 105 CFU/mL), it was considered significant. Bacterial isolates were identified using colony characteristics, Gram reaction, and biochemical tests. Gram-negative bacteria were identified using a series of biochemical tests such as triple sugar iron agar, Simon’s citrate agar, lysine iron agar, urea, motility test, and indol test. Whereas Gram-positive bacterial isolates were identified using catalase and coagulase tests [33,34,35].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic representation of the experiment workflow

Full size image

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

An antimicrobial susceptibility test was done using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Different antibiotic discs (Oxoid Ltd, UK) such as ampicillin (10 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), cotrimoxazole (25 µg), chloramphenicol (30 µg), meropenem (10 µg), nitrofurantoin (300 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg), clindamycin (15 µg), norfloxacin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), penicillin (10 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), and cefoxitin (30 µg) were used. The antibiotics were chosen based on their availability and frequent prescription in the study area by adhering to the Standards for Clinical Laboratory International (SCLI).

Briefly, 3–5 pure similar colonies were picked using a sterile wire loop and mixed in 5 mL of normal saline until the turbidity of the suspension matched 0.5 McFarland standards. A portion of suspension was inoculated on the surface of the Mueller Hinton agar plate using a dry and sterile cotton swab. After 10 min, different antibiotic discs were placed on the media and incubated at 37 oC for 24 h. After 24 h of incubation, the zone of inhibition (cm in diameter) around the discs was measured and interpreted as sensitive (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R) based on the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guidelines of 2018 [36, 37].

Data management, analysis, and interpretation

Data was analyzed using SPSS Statistical Software Ver. 25.0. Descriptive statistics were computed and results were described using tables and figures. To minimize potential confounders, covariates with p ≤ 0.25 in the bivariate analysis were made eligible in the multivariable regression model which was employed to determine the association of potential predictors with the respective outcome variables. Compression between subgroups was expressed as an odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). P < 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance.

Operational definitions

Urinary tract infection is the presence of pathogenic organisms within the urinary tract in a significant quantity (≥ 105 CFU/mL) [13]. Asymptomatic UTIs are the presence of significant bacteria (≥ 105 CFU/mL) in an individual’s urine without signs and symptoms of UTIs [1]. Symptomatic UTIs are characterized by a patient’s presence of fever, urgency, frequency, dysuria, or suprapubic tenderness [38]. Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) is defined as when the isolated bacteria are resistant to two or more drugs from different classes [39]. Bacteriuria refers to the unusual presence of bacteria in midstream urine, with a colony count exceeding 105 CFU/mL [40].

Data quality assurance

To ensure the quality of socio-demographic and clinical data, a structured questionnaire was pretested. Data collectors (nurses) were trained for one day. The sterility of culture media was checked by incubating 5% of the culture media overnight at 35–37 °C without specimen inoculation. The performance of culture media was checked by litigating control strains. Standard strains of E. coli (ATCC 25,922) and S. aureus (ATCC 25,923) were obtained from the Ethiopian Public Health Institute laboratory (EPHI) to control the performance of culture media and antibiotic discs. Any physical changes like cracks, excess moisture, color, hemolysis, dehydration, and contamination were assessed and the expiry date was also checked. As per the recommendations of the International Clinical Laboratory Standard (CLSI), standard operating procedures (SOPs) were followed and applied throughout the analysis.

Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Research and Ethical Review Board (IERB) of the College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University with reference number (MU-IRB1827/2021).All the methods were performed in accordance with relevant national, international and scientific guidelines and regulations. Besides, our study was carried out in accordance with the code of ethics of the world medical association (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments in humans. After the objective of the study was explained, before collecting the data, informed consent and assent were collected from adult participants and minors’ guardians, respectively. Participants were informed of their right to withdraw from the study and were informed about the study’s benefits to their medications and the community at large. All information, samples and experimental results obtained were kept confidential thoroughly and used for the specified objectives only. Finally, the specimens were discarded following the infection prevention guide line.

Results

Socio-demographic, clinical data characteristics, and prevalence of UTIs among the study patients

Of the 224 HIV patients selected, 150/224 (67%) were females with a mean age of 40 (± 10.60) years (Table 1). The majority of the study patients were aged between 35 and 44 years. Among the study patients, 89 (39.7%) were married, 88 (39.3%) completed their primary school education, and 78 (34.8%) were daily laborers. Clinical data of the patients indicate that 20 (8.9%) of them had other chronic diseases, 25 (11.2%) with less than 200 CD4+ cells/mm3, 202 (90.2%) with no detectable level of current HIV viral load, 192 (85.7%) good level of ART adherence, 27(12.1%) with a previous history of catheterization, and 30 (13.4%) with a previous history of UTIs. On the other hand, 30 (13.4%) and 194 (86.6%) of the study patients were categorized as UTIs symptomatic and asymptomatic, respectively. Of the total 224 patients, 28 (12.5%) of the patients were infected by UTIs-causing bacteria. Compared to female patients 24/150 (16%), male patients 4/74 (7%) were more affected by the UTIs causing bacterial isolates. Besides, 30 (13.4%) and 194 (86.6%) of the patients were detected as symptomatic and asymptomatic, respectively. HIV patients aged between 35 and 44 showed the highest percentage of UTIs (91 (40.6)).

Table 1 Socio-demographic and clinical data characteristics of HIV patients (n = 224)
Full size table

Of the total UTIs causing bacterial isolates, 85% and 25% were Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively (Fig. 2). E. coli 16/28 (57%) was the most dominant isolate followed by K. pneumonia 4/28 (14%) and S. aureus 3/28 (11%). Compared to Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria showed a high percentage in the UTIs causing bacterial isolates.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage of UTIs causing bacterial isolates among HIV patients attending

Full size image

Relation of potential factors with UTIs causing bacterial isolates

Among the socio-demographic characteristics, only gender was found to be significantly associated with the growth of UTIs-causing bacteria (Table 2). Following multivariate regression female HIV patients showed significantly at least three times more likely to have been infected by UTIs causing bacteria (AOR = 3.427; 95% CI 1.05, 11.2) as compared to male HIV patients (P = 0.042).

Table 2 Associated risk factors related to UTIs causing bacterial isolates among HIV patients
Full size table

The association between the patient’s clinical features and the growth of UTIs-causing bacteria was measured (Table 2). Previous history of UTIs (AOR 3.403; 95% CI 1.2, 9.6) and CD4+ count less than 200 cells/mm3 (AOR 3.648; 95% CI 1.2, 11.6) were significantly associated with UTIs. However, no significant association was confirmed with having dysuria, other chronic diseases, and previous history of catheterization and UTIs.

Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern

The susceptibility pattern of Gram-negative and Gram-positive isolates was determined (Table 3). E. coli (16), K. pneumonia (4), E. aerogenes (2), and P. mirabilis (2) were resistant to Ampicillin. Whereas all the UTIs-causing bacterial isolates were susceptible to nitrofurantoin. K. pneumonia was susceptible to gentamicin, meropenem, and nitrofurantoin, whereas 75% of K. pneumonia was susceptible to Ceftriaxone, Norfloxacin Tetracycline, and Ciprofloxacin. E. coli, Gram-negative bacteria, the predominant isolate was obtained to be resistant to ampicillin 15 (93.7%), cotrimoxazole 13 (81.3%), and tetracycline 12 (75%). Whereas, sensitive to nitrofurantoin 16 (100%), followed by 15 (93.7%) to ciprofloxacin and gentamicin each, 14 (87.5%) to norfloxacin, chloramphenicol, and meropenem each, and ceftriaxone 12(75%). P. mirabilis (2) was to all antibiotics except ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and tetracycline. E. arerogenes was 100% susceptible for meropenem, nitrofurantoin, ceftriaxone, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and chloramphenicol.

Table 3 Antibacterial susceptibility pattern of UTIs causing gram-negative bacterial isolates
Full size table

Of the UTIs-causing Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus was the dominant bacterium. S. aureus was found to be sensitive 3(100%) to cefoxitin, nitrofurantoin, erythromycin, clindamycin, gentamicin, penicillin, and ciprofloxacin (Table 4). Whereas, S. aureus was found to be 100% resistant to cotrimoxazole and ampicillin, and 75% resistant to tetracycline. Of the twelve antibiotics tested, the CONS were resistant only to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin.

Table 4 Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of UTIs causing Gram-positive bacterial isolates
Full size table

Multi-drug resistance pattern of the UTIs causing bacterial isolates

The multi-drug resistance (MDR) pattern of the UTIs causing bacterial isolates was evaluated (Table 5). Among the total isolates (n = 28), 22(78.6%) of the bacterial isolates were found to be multi-drug resistant (MDR ≥ 2 groups of drugs). All Gram-positive (100%) and 75% of Gram-negative bacterial isolates were resistant to two or more of the drugs that are commonly prescribed in the study area.

Table 5 Multi-drug resistance pattern of UTIs causing bacterial isolates
Full size table

Discussion

The burden of bacterial pathogens that cause UTIs and their resistance to ordinary drugs lines up with immunity depletion among patients with HIV infection [41]. Uropathogens are becoming a public health threat at an alarming rate across the globe; perhaps aggravated in resource-limited settings [42]. Female patients with a previous history of UTIs, and CD4+ count < 200/mm3 were found to be significantly associated with UTIs-causing bacteria. Whereas current HIV viral load level, history of catheterization, history of other chronic diseases, and dysuria were not significantly associated with females.

In the current study, the overall prevalence of UTIs-causing bacteria isolates among HIV patients was 12.5%. This finding corresponds with previous studies cited from Jimma (12%) [17], Gondar (11.9%) [20], Tanzania (12.3%) [27] and studies conducted elsewhere [43,44,45]. In contrast, a high prevalence of UTIs causing bacterial isolates among HIV patients was recorded from eastern Ethiopia (18%) [34], Southern Ethiopia (14.1%) [29], studies from India (77.5% and 41.7%) and [46, 47], South Africa (48.7%) [15], Warsaw (23.2%) [28] and other three studies from different states in Nigeria (21.1%, 23.5% and 93.8%) [48,49,50]. Those huge disparities might be due to the difference in sample size, sample processing techniques, the degree of the immune status of the patients, clinical features of the study patients, ART use, personal and environmental hygiene-related, sexual activity, socio-demographic, and geographical characteristics [13].

Compared to HIV-infected male patients, HIV-infected females who attended ART clinics of ACSH and MGH had about 3 times more chance of developing UTIs. This finding was in line with previous reports from Jimma and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia reported a high prevalence of UTIs causing bacterial isolates among female HIV patients than their male counterparts [17, 31]. Furthermore, a study conducted in Gondar, the northern part of Ethiopia, established a high prevalence of UTIs-causing bacteria among females than males [20]. Evidence from various epidemiological studies showed that UTIs were more common in females than in males [51, 52]. The higher prevalence rate of UTIs among female patients may be due to shorter and wider urethra, lack of prostatic fluid, and moist urethra that favors microbial growth and others are the main reasons for their vulnerability [53]. Additionally, the mechanical introduction of pathogens into the bladder and trauma increases the risk of UTIs among females irrespective of their HIV serostatus [13].

Patients with a previous history of UTIs were found to be three times more likely to develop UTIs compared to those who had never encountered previous UTIs. Previous findings that correspond with this study were reported from Gondar [20], and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia [31]. On the other hand, this result contradicts another study’s findings conducted in Jimma Ethiopia which declares no significant association with current and previous history of UTIs [17]. This might be due to the presence of resistant strains as a result of repeated therapy from those who had a previous history of UTIs and the disparities might be due to adherence to medication and health-seeking behavior differences [13].

UTIs boldly appear in HIV patients as the CD4+ level of the patients dropped [54]. In the current study, patients with CD4+ count < 200/mm3 had a chance to develop UTIs three times higher than their immuno-competent counterparts. This finding was supported by studies conducted in Ethiopia [15, 54] and India [55]. Although this explanation needs further investigation, this could be due to the depressed immunity of the patients implying that as the CD4+ counts decline, the risk of UTIs and broadly opportunistic infections also increases [31].

In our study, 85% of UTIs were caused by Gram-negative bacteria. The dominant bacterium isolated in the current study was E. coli (57%). Similar studies from Jimma (54.3%) [17], Gondar (56.1%) [20] and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia (49%) [54] reported that E. coli was the dominant bacterium to cause UTI. The result of the current finding was also comparable with studies conducted in Nigeria [56] and India [29]. The reason why E. coli was found dominant might be due to its most common presence in the vaginal and rectal area [57]. In contrast to this study, other findings from Nigeria and Ghana reported that the dominant bacterium was S. aureus with a prevalence rate of 45.33% and 40%, respectively [49, 51]. These variations might be due to sample collection technique and personal and environmental hygiene, and the availability of underlying conditions [13].

More than 80% of Gram-negative bacteria were found to be susceptible to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, gentamycin, nitrofurantoin, chloramphenicol, and norfloxacin. However, most of the Gram-negative bacterial isolates showed resistance to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and tetracycline. The finding was similar to studies reported from other areas [17, 31]. Due to their distinctive structure, Gram-negative bacteria are more resistant than Gram-positive bacteria. Most antibiotics must pass the outer membrane to access their targets, for example, hydrophobic drugs can pass through by a diffusion pathway, on the other hand, hydrophilic antibiotics like β-lactams pass through porins, and vancomycin can’t cross the outer membrane due to their structure that hinder it from using any of these passages. Any alteration in the outer membrane by Gram-negative bacteria like changing the hydrophobic properties or mutations in porins and other factors can create resistance.

Gram-positive bacteria lack this important layer, which makes Gram-negative bacteria more resistant to antibiotics. Decreasing outer membrane permeability of Gram-negative bacteria is the main reason for resistance to a wide range of antibiotics [58]. Higher resistance rates of these bacteria could be considered as great threats and alarm the stakeholders to have more surveillance and control of the use of antimicrobials to combat infection [59].

From the Gram-positive isolates, most of the S. aureus isolates showed high-level of susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, gentamicin, penicillin, ceftriaxone, erythromycin, clindamycin, and cefoxitin. On the other hand, most of the S. aureus isolates were resistant to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and tetracycline which was corroborative with other studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia [13, 31]. Our result was similar with Tanzanian study revealed that Gram-positive bacteria were the most prevalent isolates with high sensitivity to nitrofurantoin, followed by gentamycin [60]. In Uganda, Staphylococcus aureus showed sensitivity to ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, and gentamycin [5, 6]. In Nigeria, there is a growing concern over resistance to various antibiotics, including ampicillin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, co-trimoxazole, gentamicin, augmentin, vancomycin, cefuroxime, nitrofurantoin, and ofloxacin [61] .

Generally, most of the bacterial isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, gentamicin, nitrofurantoin, and meropenem. Whereas the bacterial isolates were very resistant to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and tetracycline. These findings were in agreement with the previous finding from Ethiopia [31], and South Africa [62]. This might be due to differences in the wide prescription of the drugs or the fact that the common use of cotrimoxazole is prophylaxis against HIV-associated opportunistic infections.

Antimicrobial resistance is a major clinical problem in treating infections caused by different bacterial pathogens and has increased dramatically over the current years. Multidrug resistance, which has countless implications on the health outcome of HIV patients, was observed in our study. In the current study, 78.6% of the bacteria isolates were multidrug resistant. This was higher compared to the finding reported in Mysore, India (58.3%) [63]. But, it was lower than the reports obtained from Gondar, Ethiopia (95%) [20], and Port Harcourt in Nigeria (92.8%) [64]. The antibiotic resistance pattern observed in our study could be due to antibiotic abuse, circulation of high fake drugs, use of antibiotics for animal farming, self-medication, low cost, and inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents by patients and practitioners [65].

Limitations of the study

The cross-sectional nature of our study design is the primary limitation due to a lack of testing facilities and the unprecedented genocidal war waged by the government of Ethiopia and its allies on the Tigray people, in Northern Ethiopia. We did not attempt to identify other causative agents like anaerobic UTIs causing bacteria that would have made a significant contribution to a true prevalence of UTIs causing bacteria in HIV patients. Although the current study is important in terms of identifying UTIs causing bacteria and determining their antimicrobial sensitivity that provides precise scientific data for appropriate treatment, prevention, and control of UTIs, we believe that these data are not sufficient to know the magnitude of all UTIs causing bacteria. Moreover, to identify and evaluate the isolates in terms of drug-resistant and virulence factor genes molecular studies shall have been done but it was not done.

Conclusions

In the current study, the overall prevalence of UTIs causing bacterial isolates among people living with HIV was 12.5%. Factors such as sex, CD4+ count < 200 cells/mm3, and previous history of UTIs were significantly associated with the prevalence of the UTIs causing bacterial isolates. Of the bacterial isolates, E. coli was found to be the most predominant bacteria. Most of the bacterial isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone, gentamicin, nitrofurantoin, and norfloxacin but, resistant to ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and tetracycline. As the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of UTIs causing bacteria to various antibiotics varies, management of UTIs among HIV-infected individuals is needed. To bring immunological and virological recovery, HIV patients shall get enough awareness and emphasis on care for female HIV patients through the setting of different intervention modalities. A molecular study is mandatory to identify genes responsible for drug resistance and virulence process.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because of the sensitive nature of the data but are accessible from the corresponding author at a reasonable request.

Abbreviations

ART:

Antiretroviral therapy

CD4:

Cluster of differentiation 4

CONS:

Coagulase negative staphylococcus

HIV:

Human Immunodeficiency Virus

MDR:

Multidrug resistance

UTI:

Urinary tract infection

WHO:

World Health Organization

ACSH:

Ayder Comprehensive Specialized Hospital

MGH:

Mekelle General Hospital

References

  1. Mancuso G, Midiri A, Gerace E, Marra M, Zummo S, Biondo C. Urinary tract infections: the current scenario and future prospects. Pathogens. 2023;12(4):623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Majumder MMI, Mahadi AR, Ahmed T, Ahmed M, Uddin MN, Alam MZ. Antibiotic resistance pattern of microorganisms causing urinary tract infection: a 10-year comparative analysis in a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022;11(1):156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray BO, Flores C, Williams C, Flusberg DA, Marr EE, Kwiatkowska KM, et al. Recurrent urinary tract infection: a mystery in search of better model systems. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:691210.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Abongomera G, Koller M, Musaazi J, Lamorde M, Kaelin M, Tasimwa HB, et al. Spectrum of antibiotic resistance in UTI caused by Escherichia coli among HIV-infected patients in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hailay A, Zereabruk K, Mebrahtom G, Aberhe W, Bahrey D. Magnitude and its associated factors of urinary tract infection among adult patients attending Tigray Region Hospitals, Northern Ethiopia, 2019. International Journal of Microbiology. 2020;2020.

  6. Yin H, Zhu J, Jiang Y, Mao Y, Tang C, Cao H et al. Shionone Relieves Urinary Tract Infections by Removing Bacteria from Bladder Epithelial Cells. Cellular Microbiology. 2023;2023.

  7. Tegegne KD, Wagaw GB, Gebeyehu NA, Yirdaw LT, Shewangashaw NE, Kassaw MW. Prevalence of urinary tract infections and risk factors among diabetic patients in Ethiopia, a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(1):e0278028.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pezeshki Najafabadi M, Dagoohian A, Rajaie S, Zarkesh-Esfahani SH, Edalati M. Common microbial causes of significant bacteriuria and their antibiotic resistance pattern in the Isfahan Province of Iran. J Chemother. 2018;30(6–8):348–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Seifu WD, Gebissa AD. Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Uropathogens from cases of urinary tract infections (UTI) in Shashemene referral hospital, Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Soiza R, Donaldson A, Myint P. Vaccine against arteriosclerosis: an update. Ther Adv Vaccines. 2018;9:259–61.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stevens O, Anderson RL, Sabin K, Garcia SA, Fearon E, Manda K et al. HIV prevalence in transgender populations and cisgender men who have sex with men in sub-saharan Africa 2010–2022: a meta-analysis. medRxiv. 2023.

  12. Awaidy SA, Ghazy RM, Mahomed O. Progress of the gulf cooperation council (gcc) countries towards achieving the 95-95-95 UNAIDS targets: a review. J Epidemiol Global Health. 2023;13(3):397–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tessema NN, Ali MM, Zenebe MH. Bacterial associated urinary tract infection, risk factors, and drug susceptibility profile among adult people living with HIV at Haswassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Hawassa, Southern Esthiopia. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):10790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdullahi IN, Issaoui R, Usman Y. Prevalence and genetic lineages of Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization and urinary tract infection among people living with HIV/AIDS in Nigeria: a systematic review. IJID Reg. 2022;4:17–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Marami D, Balakrishnan S, Seyoum B. Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates, and associated factors of urinary tract infections among hiv-positive patients at hiwot fana specialized university hospitastern Ethiopia. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology. 2019;2019.

  16. Reshadat-Hajiabad T, Khajavi A, Hosseinpour AM, Bojdy A, Hashemi-Meshkini A, Varmaghani M. Determinants and economic burden of HIV/AIDS in Iran: a prospective study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):251.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Debalke S, Cheneke W, Tassew H, Awol M. Urinary tract infection among antiretroviral therapy users and nonusers in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Jimma, Ethiopia. International journal of microbiology. 2014;2014.

  18. Boaitey YA, Nkrumah B, Idriss A, Tay SCK. Gastrointestinal and urinary tract pathogenic infections among HIV seropositive patients at the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital in Ghana. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elale AK, Manilal A, Tadesse D, Seid M, Dubale A. Magnitude and associated factors of bacterial urinary tract infections among paediatric patients in Arba Minch, southern Ethiopia. New Microbes and New Infections. 2023;51:101083.

  20. Kasew D, Desalegn B, Aynalem M, Tila S, Diriba D, Afework B, et al. Antimicrobial resistance trend of bacterial uropathogens at the university of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital, northwest Ethiopia: a 10 years retrospective study. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(4):e0266878.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mekonnen S, Tesfa T, Shume T, Tebeje F, Urgesa K, Weldegebreal F. Bacterial profile, their antibiotic susceptibility pattern, and associated factors of urinary tract infections in children at Hiwot Fana Specialized University Hospital, Eastern Ethiopia. PLoS ONE. 2023;18(4):e0283637.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Serwecińska L. Antimicrobials and antibiotic-resistant bacteria: a risk to the environment and to public health. Water. 2020;12(12):3313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Frieri M, Kumar K, Boutin A. Antibiotic resistance. J Infect Public Health. 2017;10(4):369–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Berhe DF, Beyene GT, Seyoum B, Gebre M, Haile K, Tsegaye M, et al. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and its clinical implications in Ethiopia: a systematic review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021;10:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sihra N, Goodman A, Zakri R, Sahai A, Malde S. Nonantibiotic prevention and management of recurrent urinary tract infection. Nat Reviews Urol. 2018;15(12):750–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kattner I. Management von Harnwegsinfekten in der primärärztlichen Praxis: Machbarkeit von FLEXICULT™(MAFL): Dissertation, Hannover, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, 2021; 2021.

  27. Ngowi BN, Sunguya B, Herman A, Chacha A, Maro E, Rugarabamu LF et al. Prevalence of multidrug resistant UTI among people living with HIV in Northern Tanzania. Infection and drug resistance. 2021:1623–33.

  28. Skrzat-Klapaczyńska A, Matłosz B, Bednarska A, Paciorek M, Firląg-Burkacka E, Horban A, Kowalska JD. Factors associated with urinary tract infections among HIV-1 infected patients. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190564.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Haile Hantalo A, Haile Taassaw K, Solomon Bisetegen F, Woldeamanuel Mulate Y. Isolation and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of bacterial uropathogens and associated factors among adult people living with HIV/AIDS attending the HIV Center at Wolaita Sodo University Teaching Referral Hospital, South Ethiopia. HIV/AIDS-Research and Palliative Care. 2020:799–808.

  30. Desta SA, Damte A, Hailu T. Maternal factors associated with low birth weight in public hospitals of Mekelle city, Ethiopia: a case-control study. Ital J Pediatr. 2020;46:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Getu Y, Ali I, Lema T, Belay H, Yeshetela B. Bacteriuria and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among HIV patients attending ALERT Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Am J Health Res. 2017;5(3):76–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lough ME, Shradar E, Hsieh C, Hedlin H. Contamination in adult midstream clean-catch urine cultures in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. J Emerg Nurs. 2019;45(5):488–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Edae M, Teklemariam Z, Weldegebreal F, Abate D. Asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Hiwot Fana specialized university hospital, Harar, eastern Ethiopia: magnitude, associated factors, and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. International Journal of Microbiology. 2020;2020.

  34. Mahgoub FM, El-Gamal S. Microbiological profile of urinary tract infections with special reference to antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Escherichia coli isolates. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2018;7(2):911–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tilahun M, Gedefie A, Bisetegn H, Debash H. Emergence of high prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase producing Acinetobacter species and pseudomonas aeruginosa among hospitalized patients at Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital, North-East Ethiopia. Infect Drug Resist. 2022:895–911.

  36. Fenta GM, Woldemariam HK, Metaferia Y, Seid A, Gebretsadik D. Admission outcome and Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern of Bacterial isolates among neonates with suspected Sepsis in neonatal intensive care unit at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Dessie, Northeastern Ethiopia. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases. 2022;2022.

  37. Woreta AN, Kebede HB, Tilahun Y, Teklegiorgis SG, Abegaz WE. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern and bacterial spectrum among patients with external eye infections at Menelik II Referral Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Infection and drug resistance. 2022:765 – 79.

  38. Trautner BW. Urinary tract infections as a continuum: implications for diagnostic and antibiotic stewardship. Oxford University Press US; 2021. pp. 1339–41.

  39. Magiorakos A-P, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas M, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(3):268–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ipe DS, Horton E, Ulett GC. The basics of bacteriuria: strategies of microbes for persistence in urine. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2016;6:14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Addis T, Mekonnen Y, Ayenew Z, Fentaw S, Biazin H. Bacterial uropathogens and burden of antimicrobial resistance pattern in urine specimens referred to Ethiopian Public Health Institute. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11):e0259602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ayukekbong JA, Ntemgwa M, Atabe AN. The threat of antimicrobial resistance in developing countries: causes and control strategies. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2017;6:1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Khoshbakht R, Salimi A, SHIRZAD AH, Keshavarzi H. Antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial strains isolated from urinary tract infections in Karaj, Iran. 2013.

  44. Evans J, McOwan A, Hillman R, Forster G. Incidence of symptomatic urinary tract infections in HIV seropositive patients and the use of cotrimoxazole as prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. Sex Transm Infect. 1995;71(2):120–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rashmi K, RaviKumar K, Bhagyashree H. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in HIV/AIDS patients: occurrence and risk associated with low CD4 counts. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2013;2(19):3358–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xavier TF, Auxilia A, Kannan M. Isolation and characterization of UTI pathogens from HIV positive patients of Karur District, Tamil Nadu, India. 2015.

  47. Banu A, Jyothi R. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in HIV positive individuals in a tertiary care hospital. J HIV Hum Reprod. 2013;1(2):54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Olowe O, Ojo-Johnson B, Makanjuola O, Olowe R, Mabayoje V. Detection of bacteriuria among human immunodeficiency virus seropositive individuals in Osogbo, south-western Nigeria. Eur J Microbiol Immunol. 2015;5(1):126–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ifeanyichukwu I, Emmanuel N, Chika E, Anthonia O, Esther U-I, Ngozi A, Justina N. Frequency and antibiogram of uropathogens isolated from urine samples of HIV infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. Am J BioScience. 2013;1(3):50–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Lokhande R. Rationale for near total thyroidectomy in patients with nodular goitre. Pain. 2012;3(7.14).

  51. Barnie PA, Akwetey S, Swallah MH, Acheampong DO, Kwakye-Nuako G. Occurrence and distribution of bacterial uropathogens among antiretroviral therapy users and non-users, Cape Coast Teaching Hospital. Am J Multidisciplinary Res. 2019;8(1).

  52. Nwadioha S, Nwokedi E, Ikeh I, Egesie J, Kashibu E. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of uropathogenic bacterial isolates from AIDS patients in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. J Med Med Sci. 2010;1(11):530–4.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yismaw G, Asrat D, Woldeamanuel Y, Unakal CG. Urinary tract infection: bacterial etiologies, drug resistance profile and associated risk factors in diabetic patients attending Gondar University Hospital, Gondar, Ethiopia. Eur J Experimental Biology. 2012;2(4):889–98.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fenta G, Legese M, Weldearegay G. Bacteriuria and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns among people living with HIV attending Tikur Anbessa Specialized and Zewditu Memorial Hospital ART clinics, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Bacteriol Parasitol 2016;7(05).

  55. Inyang-Etoh P. Asymptomatic bacteriuria in patients on antiretroviral drug therapy in calabar PC., Inyang-Etoh GC, Udofa AAA. Alaribe and NE Udonwa. J Med Sci. 2009;9(6):270-5.

  56. Marwa KJ, Mushi MF, Konje E, Alele PE, Kidola J, Mirambo MM. Resistance to cotrimoxazole and other antimicrobials among isolates from HIV/AIDS and non-HIV/AIDS patients at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. AIDS Research and Treatment. 2015;2015.

  57. Lewis AL, Gilbert NM. Roles of the vagina and the vaginal microbiota in urinary tract infection: evidence from clinical correlations and experimental models. GMS Infect Dis. 2020;8.

  58. Breijyeh Z, Jubeh B, Karaman R. Resistance of gram-negative bacteria to current antibacterial agents and approaches to resolve it. Molecules. 2020;25(6):1340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Kebede B, Yihunie W, Abebe D, Addis Tegegne B, Belayneh A. Gram-negative bacteria isolates and their antibiotic-resistance patterns among pediatrics patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review. SAGE open Med. 2022;10:20503121221094191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Mnyambwa NP, Mahende C, Wilfred A, Sandi E, Mgina N, Lubinza C et al. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates from routine clinical specimens from Referral Hospitals in Tanzania: A prospective hospital-based observational study. Infection and drug resistance. 2021:869 – 78.

  61. Onanuga A, Awhowho GO. Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus strains from patients with urinary tract infections in Yenagoa, Nigeria. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012;4(3):226–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Iweriebor B, Obi C, Akinyemi O, Ramalivhana N, Hattori T, Okoh A. Uropathogens isolated from HIV-infected patients from Limpopo Province, South Africa. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11(46):10598–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Murugesh K, Deepa S, Ravindranath C, Venkatesha D. Multi drug resistant uropathogens in HIV: are they a threat to community. Int J Sci Study. 2014;2(3):38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Frank-Peterside N, Okerentugba P, Nwodo C, Okonko I. Prevalence of bacterial uropathogens in a cohort of HIV-positive males in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Cancer Biology. 2013;3(4):12–7.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Manyi-Loh C, Mamphweli S, Meyer E, Okoh A. Antibiotic use in agriculture and its consequential resistance in environmental sources: potential public health implications. Molecules. 2018;23(4):795.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to aknowledge to Dr.tewelde legesse and Mekelle University laboratory prefessionals for their unresserved Healp in performing the laboratory procedures.

Funding

This study was funded by Mekelle University. Dr, Tewelde College of Health Sciences also provided the reagents required to perform the respective laboratory investigations. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Dr. Tewelde Legesse College of Health Sciences, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia

    Tsgabu Kahsay

  2. Department of Biomedical Research and Technology Transfer, Tigray Health Research Institute, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia

    Gebrecherkos Teame Gebrehiwot, Gebreselema Gebreyohannes, Mulugeta Tilahun & Ataklti Gessese

  3. Department of Biological and Chemical Engineering, Mekelle Institute Technology, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia

    Gebreselema Gebreyohannes

  4. Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Tigray, Ethiopia

    Amlisha Kahsay

Authors
  1. Tsgabu Kahsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gebrecherkos Teame Gebrehiwot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gebreselema Gebreyohannes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mulugeta Tilahun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ataklti Gessese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Amlisha Kahsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors contributed significantly to all the reports in the manuscript. TK, MT, AG, and AK were involved in the study conception and design. TK performed the laboratory tests and the data analysis and was a major contributor to the drafting of the manuscript. MT, AG, GG, and AK were involved in the drafting of the manuscript. GT contributed to the laboratory investigations and drafting of the manuscript. GT and GG were major contributors to the writing and refinement of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gebrecherkos Teame Gebrehiwot.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent given to the patients

The Ethical review committee of the College of Health Sciences of Mekelle University approved the study. All patients were included after providing written informed consent and/or assent as appropriate. For illiterate patients, data collectors read the informed consent for each respondent and confirmed the willingness of the patients by signing the informed consent sheet. Moreover, the confidentiality of the patient’s information was safeguarded.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kahsay, T., Gebrehiwot, G.T., Gebreyohannes, G. et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of urinary tract infections causing bacterial isolates and associated risk factors among HIV patients in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. BMC Microbiol 24, 148 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03297-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03297-2

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us