Open Access

Genomic island excisions in Bordetella petrii

  • Melanie Lechner1,
  • Karin Schmitt1,
  • Susanne Bauer1,
  • David Hot2, 5,
  • Christine Hubans3,
  • Erwan Levillain2, 5,
  • Camille Locht4, 5,
  • Yves Lemoine2, 5 and
  • Roy Gross1Email author
BMC Microbiology20099:141

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-141

Received: 28 November 2008

Accepted: 18 July 2009

Published: 18 July 2009



Among the members of the genus Bordetella B. petrii is unique, since it is the only species isolated from the environment, while the pathogenic Bordetellae are obligately associated with host organisms. Another feature distinguishing B. petrii from the other sequenced Bordetellae is the presence of a large number of mobile genetic elements including several large genomic regions with typical characteristics of genomic islands collectively known as integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs). These elements mainly encode accessory metabolic factors enabling this bacterium to grow on a large repertoire of aromatic compounds.


During in vitro culture of Bordetella petrii colony variants appear frequently. We show that this variability can be attributed to the presence of a large number of metastable mobile genetic elements on its chromosome. In fact, the genome sequence of B. petrii revealed the presence of at least seven large genomic islands mostly encoding accessory metabolic functions involved in the degradation of aromatic compounds and detoxification of heavy metals. Four of these islands (termed GI1 to GI3 and GI6) are highly related to ICEclc of Pseudomonas knackmussii sp. strain B13. Here we present first data about the molecular characterization of these islands. We defined the exact borders of each island and we show that during standard culture of the bacteria these islands get excised from the chromosome. For all but one of these islands (GI5) we could detect circular intermediates. For the clc-like elements GI1 to GI3 of B. petrii we provide evidence that tandem insertion of these islands which all encode highly related integrases and attachment sites may also lead to incorporation of genomic DNA which originally was not part of the island and to the formation of huge composite islands. By integration of a tetracycline resistance cassette into GI3 we found this island to be rather unstable and to be lost from the bacterial population within about 100 consecutive generations. Furthermore, we show that GI3 is self transmissible and by conjugation can be transferred to B. bronchiseptica thus proving it to be an active integrative and conjugative element


The results show that phenotypic variation of B. petrii is correlated with the presence of genomic islands. Tandem integration of related islands may contribute to island evolution by the acquisition of genes originally belonging to the bacterial core genome. In conclusion, B. petrii appears to be the first member of the genus in which horizontal gene transfer events have massively shaped its genome structure.


The enormous impact of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) on the evolution of bacterial species has only been recognized during the past years [1]. Among the mobile genetic elements involved in HGT genomic islands are of particular relevance since they can comprise large genomic regions encoding accessory factors required by the bacteria to thrive in specific environments. For example, many virulence related factors of pathogenic bacteria are encoded on so-called pathogenicity islands, while metabolic islands frequently encode factors required for detoxification of poisonous compounds or for the utilization of specific carbon sources such as aromatic compounds [2, 3].

The genus Bordetella harbours several important pathogens infecting humans and various animals. While B. pertussis and B. parapertussis are etiological agents of whooping cough in man, B. bronchiseptica and B. avium can cause respiratory infections in various mammalian species and birds, respectively [4]. B. petrii was the first Bordetella species isolated from the environment, while all other Bordetella species so far could only be found in obligate association with host organisms [5]. Phylogenetically, B. petrii appears to be closely related to a common ancestor of the pathogenic Bordetellae and links the genus with other environmental bacteria of the genera Achromobacter and Alcaligenes [5, 6]. B. petrii was repeatedly isolated from contaminated soil [7, 8]. However, recently, several isolates from clinical specimens associated with bone degenerative disease or cystic fibrosis were found to be closely related to B. petrii, although the underlying etiology is not clear in any of the cases [911]. The pathogenic Bordetellae encode a multitude of virulence factors including several toxins and adhesins [4]. The evolutionary origin of these factors is unclear, since in contrast to many virulence genes of other pathogens they are not located on mobile genetic elements such as pathogenicity islands or prophages. In fact, so far only few presumptive horizontal gene transfer events are known among the pathogenic members of the genus, e.g. a 66 kb island encoding iron transport genes that presumably has been exchanged between B. pertussis and B. holmesii, a pathogenic species mainly found in immunocompromised individuals [12]. A prevalent feature in the evolution of virulence in this genus is reductive genome evolution, since strains specialized on particular host organisms such as the exclusive human pathogen B. pertussis have presumably evolved from a B. bronchiseptica-like ancestor. Specialization to a single host was accompanied by a massive genome size reduction. In agreement with this assumption, B. pertussis harbors numerous pseudogenes and virtually all B. pertussis genes have counterparts in B. bronchiseptica [13].

In contrast to B. bronchiseptica, B. petrii has a highly mosaic genome harbouring numerous mobile elements including genomic islands, prophages and insertion elements. These mobile elements comprise about 22% of the entire genome [14]. Most of the seven putative genomic islands found in B. petrii exhibit typical features of such islands such as a low GC content, the presence of integrase genes, conjugal transfer functions, and integration at tRNA loci (Figure 1). There are four elements (GI1–GI3, GI6) which strongly resemble the ICEclc of Pseudomonas knackmussii sp. train B13, a self transmissible element encoding factors for the degradation of chloroaromatic compounds [1416]. The Bordetella islands exhibit a high similarity with the ICEclc in particular in a core region comprising a highly similar integrase and genes involved in conjugal transfer [14]. Like the ICEclc the B. petrii elements are characterized by the insertion into tRNAGly genes and by direct repeats formed at the insertion site [14]. The B. petrii islands encode factors required for degradation of a variety of aromatic compounds, or multi drug efflux pumps and iron transport functions [14].
Figure 1

A schematic presentation of the genomic islands described for B. petrii by bioinformatic analysis is shown [14]. Direct repeats (DR) flanking the islands and their sequence position in the B. petrii genome are indicated. Direct repeats with identical or nearly identical DNA sequence are shown in the same colour (see also Figure 4). The approximate location of several characteristic genes such as the parA, ssb and topB genes found on all clc-like elements, integrases (int), or some relevant metabolic functions encoded by the islands are shown. In case tRNA genes are associated with the islands these are shown with an arrow indicating their transcriptional polarity. Finally, the approximate sizes of the predicted islands are indicated.

The remaining genomic islands, GI4, GI5, and GI7, encode type IV secretion systems probably involved in conjugal transfer [14]. GI4 has very pronounced similarities with Tn4371 of Ralstonia oxalatica and other bacteria including Achromobacter georgiopolitanum and encodes metabolic functions involved in the degradation of aromatic compounds [17]. GI5 and GI7 encode a phage P4 related integrase and genes involved in metabolism of aromatic compounds or in detoxification of heavy metals. Finally, there is a region on the B. petrii genome (termed GI in [14]) which is characterized by a low GC content, but does not have other characteristic features of a genomic island thus possibly being a remnant of a former mobile element. GI encodes metabolic functions for the degradation of phthalate and protocatechuate [14].

In the present study we characterize these putative genomic islands and show that most of them are in fact active, at least in terms of excision from the chromosome. We show that these elements are responsible for the genomic instability of B. petrii observed during long term growth in vitro.

Results and discussion

Long term survival of B. petrii in river water and appearance of phenotypic variants

B. petrii was the first Bordetella species isolated from the environment, i.e. from a river sediment. The analysis of its survival capacity in river water revealed a high survival rate and nearly no decay in viability during a period of 38 weeks, while under the same experimental conditions viability of a B. bronchiseptica strain declined rapidly and no viable bacteria could be detected in the water samples after about three weeks (data not shown). The short survival time of B. bronchiseptica is somewhat surprising, since in a previous study it was shown to persist for more than 20 weeks in lake water [18]. A possible explanation for this may be that different B. bronchiseptica strains were used in these studies. However, the direct comparison of B. bronchiseptica and B. petrii demonstrates that B. petrii has a much more pronounced capacity to survive in river water for a prolonged time period which is in agreement with its original isolation from river sediment. Interestingly, after about 20 days of the survival experiment stable phenotypic variants of B. petrii with differing colony morphology regarding colour and colony size appeared when the bacteria were plated on LB agar plates (data not shown). In this study, three of these variants (named f, g, k) were further characterized. All of these variants showed virtually identical growth characteristics at 37°C in liquid LB medium, while two of them (f, k) showed a markedly impaired growth capacity at 15°C as compared to the wild type strain and to variant g (data not shown).

Genome rearrangements involving the genomic islands of B. petrii

In a previous study we have reported about the spontaneous loss of a huge part comprising more than 500 Kb of the genome of B. petrii during in vitro culture correlating with the presence of several genomic islands (GI1–GI3) [14]. To investigate whether the frequent appearance of phenotypic variants of B. petrii is in fact correlated with the various genomic islands, we started to characterize the three variants described above by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Figure 2 shows that after Bcu I digestion each of the three variants lack three large bands as compared to the wild type, but they have an identical restriction pattern among each other. To identify those regions of the variants lacking as compared to the wild type we performed hybridization studies with a B. petrii DNA-whole genome microarray. The results presented in Table 1 show that in all three variants the same genes are missing and that the deleted regions correspond to the clc-like elements GI1, GI3, and GI6 and to the island GI5. This shows that during in vitro culture these four elements have been lost in the three variants. It is surprising that all three variants exhibit identical genomic variation, since, as mentioned above, they have different growth characteristics at 15°C and colony morphology. Therefore, additional mutation(s) must have occurred which did not involve large deletions detectable by the array experiments.
Figure 2

The left panel shows genomic rearrangements of three spontaneous colony variants of B. petrii. Genomic DNA of B. petrii wild type (1), variant f (2), variant g (3) and variant k (4) was cut with Bcu I and separated by pulsed field electrophoresis. The red arrows indicate three bands which are missing in the three variants as compared to the wild type. The right panel shows a representative pulsed field gel of wild type B. bronchiseptica PS2 (lane 1), B. petrii (lane 2) and the two GI3::tetR transconjugants of B. bronchiseptica (lanes 3,4) after digestion with Bcu I. The red arrows indicate the additional bands present in the transconjugants as compared to B. bronchiseptica wild type.

Table 1

Characterization of spontaneous B. petrii variants using a DNA microarray

Predicted genomic islands (GI)

Genes present or absent in the variants g, f, and k

Presence of GI in the variants

GI (Bpet0187 – Bpet0310)

Bpet0187 – Bpet0310


GI1 (Bpet1009 – Bpet1275)

Δ Bpet1009 – Bpet1287


GI2 (Bpet1288 – Bpet1437)

Bpet1288 – Bpet1437


GI3 (Bpet1438 – Bpet1545)

Δ Bpet1438 – Bpet1545


GI4 (Bpet2166 – Bpet2216)

Bpet2166 – Bpet2216


GI5 (Bpet3699 – Bpet3770)

Δ Bpet3699 – Bpet3779


GI6 (Bpet4174 – Bpet4316)

Δ Bpet4174 – Bpet4315


GI7 (Bpet4544 – Bpet4630)

Bpet4544 – Bpet4630


The comparison of the deleted genes of the variants with those which according to the annotation are encoded on the GIs revealed a perfect congruence of the predicted island borders and the microarray data in the case of GI3, while the extent of the deletions and therefore the sizes of these elements differed from the bioinformatic prediction in the case of GI1, GI5 and GI6 [14]. According to these data, GI1 appears to comprise additional 12 genes (Bpet1267–1287), GI5 additional 9 genes (Bpet3771–3779), and GI6 appears to lack one gene (Bpet4316) (Table 1). These data were further corroborated by a series of Southern blot experiments with probes specific for the respective genes, the results of which matched perfectly with the microarray data (data not shown).

Definition of the borders of the genomic islands of B. petrii

Integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) are known to be self transmissible genomic islands and their excision is mediated by the recombination between the left and right end repeats leading to a circular intermediate and the integration by the recombination between the attachment site on the chromosome (attB) and the conserved attachment site (attP) on the circular element [2, 19]. To determine the exact borders of the GIs and to detect circular intermediates occurring after excision of the elements we used a PCR based approach. For the detection of excised circular intermediates of the various GIs, a series of oligonucleotide primers was designed from the presumable ends of the respective elements which are supposed to join during circularization. In the case of the adjacent elements GI1, GI2 and GI3 we considered that also various combinations might occur by common excision events of these adjacent islands (Figure 3). The direct repeats flanking the various clc-like elements of B. petrii are shown in Figure 4.
Figure 3

Schematic presentation of the genomic region comprising the genomic islands GI1, GI2 and GI3. The GIs are shown as a red lines, their flanking direct repeat regions (DR) by red boxes (dark and light red for identical or nearly identical sequences, respectively) (see also Figure 4). The sequence position of the direct repeats and the approximate size of the islands are shown below the elements. The position of tRNA genes is indicated. Some relevant or characteristic genes encoded by the islands are shown above the elements. The bars below the elements show the expected dimensions of the element after excision from the genome. Stars indicate predicted elements which may use alternative direct repeat sequences for excision or elements composed of more than one island. Arrows above the bars indicate the approximate position of PCR primers and their names (in blue) designed for the amplification of the respective circular intermediates of these elements (Tab. 3).
Figure 4

The direct repeats generated by the integration of the clc -like elements in the B. petrii genome are shown. Identical sequences are indicated in red or blue letters, respectively. Sequence identities are indicated by vertical bars. The positions of the sequences on the genome sequence are shown on the left and the right of the sequences. The core region identical in all repeats flanking the clc-like elements is indicated by the green box. In case the repeats are part of a tRNA gene, the respective gene is mentioned on the right side of the respective sequences.

Table 2 shows the results of this analysis. In the case of GI1 no product could be amplified when using the primer pair GI1–1/GI1–2 which should provide a product, when the excision involves the direct repeat sequences directly upstream (sequence position 1,084,006) and downstream (sequence position 1,339,485) of the island. Instead, a product was obtained when the primer pair GI1–2/GI1–3 was used which can yield a product only when ring formation involved an alternative downstream repeat sequence (sequence position 1,350,146). This alternative downstream repeat sequence has three mismatches as compared to the upstream repeat and has probably been generated by the integration of GI2, since GI2 at the downstream end is flanked by a second nearly identical copy of this direct repeat (Figure 4). These data indicate that the size of GI1 is in fact larger than previously suggested and confirm the microarray data of the spontaneous variants which indicated that the genes Bpet1276–1287 are excised together with GI1 (termed GI1* in Figure 3). The genomic region comprising Bpet1276–Bpet1287 has a high GC content of about 67% which is typical for the B. petrii core genome. The respective genes encode hypothetical proteins, two transcriptional regulators and in addition the tRNAGly gene which was likely the original insertion point of GI1. The alternative direct repeat sequence flanking the adjacent GI2 may now be the preferred target of the GI1 integrase and may allow the element to incorporate this region of the genome thereby leading to an extension of the primordial GI1. Thus, tandem integration of genomic islands may lead to acquisition and transfer of additional genetic material of the host genome and thereby may contribute to evolution of GIs.
Table 2

PCR detection of excised circular intermediates of the genomic islands GI1 to GI7


Primer combinations used

Size of the expected PCR product [bp]

PCR product obtained





















































For GI2 we obtained a PCR product demonstrating the involvement of the direct repeats directly flanking the island at sequence positions 1,350,146 and 1,493,541. Since GI2 is not directly associated with a tRNA gene it appears likely that it has integrated in the left repeat of GI3 at sequence position 1,493,541, which was generated by the previous insertion of GI3 in the respective tRNA gene (tRNA-11). For GI3 we obtained the expected data which also correspond to the microarray results described above. Moreover, we obtained evidence that the clc-like elements GI1–GI3 can excise together in different combinations: GI2–GI3 and GI1–GI2–GI3. Therefore, these islands appear to be able to excise independently from each other, but also in various combinations thereby potentially forming composed transmissible elements. In the case of the fourth clc-like element, GI6, the microarray data revealed the presence of the Bpet4316 gene in the chromosome even after excision of the element. This is surprising, since the direct repeat sequence which should be the target for the GI6 integrase lies beyond this gene. Thus, the Bpet4316 gene should be located within the excised region. Curiously, the PCR experiments aiming in the detection of circular intermediates showed that the Bpet4316 gene is also part of the circular excised form of this element. This suggests a duplication of the Bpet4316 gene during excision by an unknown mechanism.

In the case of GI4 and GI7 we obtained PCR products providing evidence for excised circular intermediates which perfectly match the previous bioinformatical predictions based on the detailed sequence analysis about the size of these islands. In contrast, in case of GI5 we were not able to detect a circular intermediate neither with the originally predicted borders nor with the additional genes suggested by the microarray experiments (Bpet3771–3779), although the microarray data of the phenotypic variants f, g, and k definitely revealed the deletion of this element from their genomes.

As shown above, we were able to detect circular intermediates of most genomic islands by PCR amplification, although the microarray experiments with the phenotypic variants clearly demonstrated the deletion events. Possible explanations for this fact could be that the excised islands are diluted during growth of the bacteria since they cannot replicate. Moreover, the experimental protocols for the two methods are different and PCR amplification is much more sensitive as compared to cy3/cy5 labeling by Klenow polymerisation.

Stability of genomic island GI3

The frequent appearance of phenotypic variants involving the genomic islands present in the B. petrii genome and the detection of circular intermediates of these islands under standard growth conditions indicates that these genomic islands are rather unstable and active at least in terms of excision. To assess the stability of one of these islands (GI3) by homologous recombination we integrated a tetracycline resistance cassette in GI3 between the genes Bpet1523 and Bpet1524 coding for a putative transposase and a glycosyltransferase, respectively. Under standard growth conditions, the resulting strain B. petrii GI3::tetR did not show any change in its maximum specific growth rate as compared to the wild type (data not shown). This strain was then used for growth experiments without selective pressure in which the bacteria were cultivated for about 150 consecutive generations. Exponentially growing B. petrii has a generation time of about 90 min (data not shown). Figure 5 shows the time course of loss of GI3::tetR determined by differential counting of tetracycline resistant and sensitive bacteria plated out on the respective agar plates. GI3 was stably present in the B. petrii population for about 40 generations, then the proportion of tetracycline resistant bacteria declined steadily and virtually no tetracycline resistant bacteria were found in the population after about 100 generations. Lack of the entire GI3 was confirmed by Southern blotting in representatives of these bacteria (data not shown). Although we cannot exclude a destabilizing effect of the tetracycline cassette on the island, it is likely that GI3 is highly unstable and gets lost with a high incidence when no selective pressure for its persistence is present.
Figure 5

Stability of the genomic island GI3 in the genome of B. petrii during culture grown without selective pressure. On the x-axis the number of consecutive generations of the bacteria culture and on the y-axis the proportion of tetracycline resistant bacteria in the culture is shown.

Transfer of genomic island GI3 to Bordetella bronchiseptica

In the case of the ICEclc self transmission to a variety of β- and γ-Proteobacteria was observed [20]. Since the clc-like element GI3 is active at least in terms of excision from the chromosome, we investigated its capacity to transfer itself to another host. Therefore, the above described B. petrii GI3::tetR strain carrying a tetracycline resistance gene in GI3 was used for conjugation experiments with B. bronchiseptica. As a recipient B. bronchiseptica PS2 was used which carries a TnphoA insertion in the genome conferring kanamycin resistance [21]. Transconjugants were selected by their resistance against kanamycin and tetracycline. Two transconjugants were isolated and further characterized by pulsed field gel electrophoresis after restriction of the genomic DNA with Bcu I. Both strains showed two additional bands of the same size, which is in agreement with the fact that the only Bcu I restriction site in GI3::tetR is located in the tetracycline gene cassette (Figure 2). To identify the integration site of GI3::tetR in PS2 we used a PCR based approach. Since clc-like elements are known to preferentially integrate in genes coding for tRNAGly we designed oligonucleotides to amplify the four tRNAGly genes present in B. bronchiseptica. For three out of the four tRNA genes we obtained PCR products of the expected size. Only in the case of the BBt45 gene no PCR product was obtained suggesting the integration of GI3::tetR in this tRNA gene (data not shown). To identifiy the exact insertion site we used primers GI3-2 and GI3-1 from the two ends of GI3::tetR and designed additional primers (tRNA45-1 and tRNA45-2) from the neighbouring sequences of the BBt45 gene. As expected, using the primer pairs GI3-2/tRNA45-1 and GI3-1/tRNA45-2 we obtained two PCR products of 625 bp and 647 bp, respectively. Sequence analysis of these products confirms the integration of GI3::tetR in the BBt45 gene and reveals the duplication of the last 18 bp of the tRNAGly gene and an inverted repeat sequence in the direct neighbourhood. The duplicated sequence is identical with the direct repeats in B. petrii flanking GI1 on both sides and GI3 on the right side (Figure 6). Similarily, the inverted repeat sequence in the proximity of the integration site in B. bronchiseptica resembles inverted repeat sequences associated with the integration sites of ICE-GI3 of B. petrii and ICEclc in Pseudomonas knackmussii sp. strain B13 [22]. The fact that GI3 can actively excise and reintegrate into the genome of a recipient strain proves this island to be a functional integrative and conjugative element and therefore it should be renamed ICE-GI3.
Figure 6

Comparison of the integration sites of GI1–GI3 in B. petrii (on the top) and of GI3::tet R in B. bronchiseptica PS2 (below). Above the respective DNA sequences a schematic presentation of the integration regions is shown. In B. petrii GI1–GI3 is integrated in a tRNAGly gene (tRNA11) leading to an 18 bp duplication of the 3'-end of the tRNA (red boxes). On the left side of the integration side an inverted repeat (IR) is indicated. Upstream of the IR a gene encoding a tRNACys is located. In B. bronchiseptica GI3::tetR is once more integrated in a gene encoding a tRNAGly (tRNA45) leading to a 18 bp duplication of its 3'-end. Much alike in B. petrii the direct repeat sequence is followed by an inverted repeat (IR). Below the schematic presentations of the integration regions the respective DNA sequences of the integration sites are shown. The start points of the tRNA genes are indicated by horizontal arrows indicating transcriptional polarity of the genes followed by a bar marked with a star which indicates the end of the tRNA gene. Vertical arrows indicate the integration sites of the GIs in the tRNA genes. Related inverted repeat sequences (IR) present in both species are boxed. In the case of B. bronchiseptica the sequence position indicated is taken from the genome sequence of strain RB50 [13].


The data presented here underline the previous notion of a highly mosaic genome of B. petrii. By microarray analysis of spontaneous phenotypic variants of B. petrii and by direct detection of excised circular intermediates of the B. petrii GIs we show that all of them are active at least in terms of excision. We provide evidence that the adjacent integration of highly related elements may enable these elements to pick up additional genomic material placed between the integration sites thereby leading to an increase in the size of the islands. Moreover, the adjacent placement of islands encoding highly similar integrases and attachment sites may also lead to the formation of novel huge composite islands. For ICE-GI3 we show that without selective pressure this island is lost from the bacterial population. Moreover, we show that this island is self transmissible and can be transferred to another Bordetella species, B. bronchiseptica. Therefore, the evolution of B. petrii involved massive horiztonal gene transfer, while in the classical pathogenic Bordetella species only very few examples of HGT have been reported, e.g. the horizontal transfer of insertion elements, the acquisition of an genomic region encoding an iron uptake system in B. holmesii and, possibly, the inactivation of the genes encoding adenylate cyclase toxin in a specific B. bronchiseptica lineage by a horizontally acquired gene cluster encoding peptide transport genes [12, 23, 24]. This may indicate that their unique habitat due to an obligate host association has dramatically limited the impact on horizontal gene transfer for the pathogenic Bordetellae once they had acquired their capacity to infect and to persist exclusively in vertebrate hosts.


Bacterial strains and growth conditions

In this study B. petrii DSM12804, the type strain of the species [5], B. bronchiseptica BB7866 [25], and B. bronchiseptica PS2, carrying a TnphoA insertion in the genome, conferring kanamycine resistance [21], were used. B. petrii was routinely grown in LB broth, while B. bronchiseptica strains were cultured on BG-agar plates or in SS-liquid medium, as previously described [26]. If necessary, antibiotics were added to the culture media in the following concentrations: tetracycline, 12.5 μg/ml; kanamycine, 50 μg/ml. Conjugation experiments were carried out by filter mating as described previously [26]. The long time survival experiments were carried out as described by Preston and Wardlaw [18]. For this purpose sterile filtered river water from the river Main was inoculated with bacteria B. bronchiseptica BB7866 and B. petrii (2,000 CFU/ml), respectively, and incubated at 37°C. Samples were taken at different time intervals up to 263 days after inoculation and bacterial number was counted by plating out serial dilutions of the bacteria.

Molecular genetic tools

DNA manipulations including cloning, restriction analysis, DNA-sequence analysis, preparation of genomic DNA, Southern blots were carried out according to standard procedures. In all cases, chromosomal DNA used for PCR reactions or for whole genome hybridization analyses was purified from bacterial cultures inoculated from single colonies on agar plates. Pulsed field electrophoresis was carried out with the BioRad CHEF-DRII system as described previously [5].

B. petrii DNA microarray specifications and hybridization conditions

Sixty-mer oligonucleotides sequences were designed as described previously using OligoArray2.0[27]. Lyophilised 5'-aminated oligonucleotides (Sigma Aldrich) were then resuspended in SciSPOT AM 1× buffer at 20 μM final concentration before being spotted on aldehyde coated Nexterion slides AL (Schott) using QArray2 (Genetix) spotter. Slides were then incubated at room temperature in a humidity chamber (> 90% relative humidity) and then in an oven at 120°C during 1 hour. Slide surface was then blocked twice for 2 min in 0.2% SDS solution, then twice for 2 min in RNase-DNase free water. The slides were then incubated at room temperature during 15 min in 125 mM NaBH4 prepared extemporally in a 3:1 (vol/vol) PBS:Ethanol mixture. The slides were then rinsed twice for 2 min in 0.2% SDS, then twice for 2 min in RNase-DNase free water and dried before hybridisation.

Genomic DNA extraction and labelling

Genomic DNA used for the microarray experiments was prepared by using the Genomic-tip 100/G anion exchange columns (Qiagen), following the manufactor's recommendation. 20 μg of the genomic DNA was digested with MboI restriction enzyme (2 U/μg, Fermentas) at 37°C for 2 hours and complete restriction was confirmed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The fragmented genomic DNA was purified with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1). Aliqouts of 2 μg of genomic DNA were labelled using the Amersham Nick Translation Kit N5500 (GE Healthcare) in the presence of 91.3 μM dATP, 91.3 μM dGTP, 91.3 μM dTTP, 26.1 μM dCTP, and 33 μM Cy3-dCTP or Cy5-dCTP. Cy-labelled dCTP was obtained from Perkin-Elmer. After incubation at 15°C in the dark for 4 hours, the labelled genomic DNA was purified using the QIAquick Spin PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen).

Microarray hybridisation and data analysis

Genomic DNA from the reference strain B. petrii DSM 12804 was hybridised against each B. petrii variant (g, k, f) in a dye-swap experimental design. Labeled genomic DNA was resuspended in 480 μl of hybridisation buffer containing 40% deionised formamide, 5× Denhardt's solution, 50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM Na pyrophosphate, and 5× SSC, denatured at 95°C for 3 min and hybridised to the B. petrii microarray for at least 12 hours at 52°C. After hybridisation the microarrays were washed for 5–8 min at 42°C with wash buffer (2× SSC, 0.2% SDS), in 0.5× SSC for 10 min and in 0.05× SSC for 5 min at room temperature. A last rinse was carried out in 0.01× SSC for 30 sec before the microarrays were dried by centrifugation for 5 min at 200 g. The arrays were scanned using an Innoscan 700 (Innopsys) microarray scanner, and analyzed with ImaGene 8.0.0 (BioDiscovery). Normalisation of the data was carried out with R Project for Statistical Computing The following genome typing analysis was performed with the program GACK

Determination of circular intermediates of the genomic islands by PCR

To detect circular intermediates in the case of the B. petrii islands oligonucleotides were designed such that in PCR reactions amplification products can only be obtained when the elements are circularised. The PCR primers used for the detection of circular intermediates of the various genomic islands are shown in Table 3. The expected products of these PCR reactions are listed in Table 2. In case of successful amplification the PCR products were sequenced to confirm the specificity of the amplification.
Table 3

Oligonucleotides used in this study



















































Construction of a B. petrii strain harbouring a tetracycline resistance gene in GI3

The insertion of a tetracycline resistance cassette in the genomic island GI3 was performed by homologous recombination using a tetracycline resistance cassette derived from the cloning vector pBR322 flanked by B. petrii derived sequences. Briefly, for this purpose two DNA fragments derived from the intergenic region of the B. petrii genes Bpet1523 and Bpet1524 encoded on GI3 were amplified using the PCR primer pairs Tet1/Tet2 and Tet3/Tet4 (Table 3) which harboured restriction sites for Not I and Bcu I (Tet1/Tet2) and for Eco RI and Xho I (Tet3/Tet4), thereby providing suitable ends for ligation with the tetracycline gene cassette. The tetracycline gene was ligated with the amplified DNA fragments and cloned into pBluescript KS cut with Not I and Xho I. The plasmid harbouring the tetracycline cassette was then purified and electroporated into B. petrii according to standard procedures using a Micropulser (BioRad, Germany). Bacteria were then plated on LB agar plates containing tetracycline to select for integration of the tetracycline cassette into the genome. Resulting clones were checked by Southern blotting and PCR analysis for proper integration of the resistance cassette at the desired position on GI3. The resulting strain B. petrii GI3::tetR was used for conjugation experiments and for the analysis of island stability. These experiments were carried out as described previously [28]. Briefly, overnight cultures (15 h, 37°C) of the strain were diluted 1:100 in 30 ml of LB broth. Bacteria were incubated at 37°C and samples were taken during the late lag, mid-log, early stationary, and late stationary phases. The identification of spontaneously arising tetracycline sensitive clones was performed by plating out serial dilutions on LB agar plates with and without tetracycline.



We thank Dagmar Beier for critically reading this manuscript. This work was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft within the priority research programme SFB479/A2.

Authors’ Affiliations

Lehrstuhl für Mikrobiologie, Biozentrum, Universität Würzburg
TAG – Transcriptomics and Applied Genomics UMR8161, Institut Pasteur de Lille
Genoscreen Company, Campus de l'Institut Pasteur de Lille
Mécanismes Moléculaires de la Pathogénie Bactérienne, INSERM U 629, Institut Pasteur de Lille
IFR 142, Molecular and Cellular Medecine, Institut Pasteur de Lille


  1. Gogarten JP, Townsend JP: Horizontal gene transfer, genome innovation and evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005, 3: 679-687. 10.1038/nrmicro1204.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Juhas M, Meer van der JR, Gaillard M, Harding RM, Hood DW, Crook DW: Genomic islands: tools of bacterial horizontal gene transfer and evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009, 33: 376-393. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00136.x.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Dobrindt U, Hochhut B, Hentschel U, Hacker J: Genomic islands in pathogenic and environmental microorganisms. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004, 2: 414-424. 10.1038/nrmicro884.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Mattoo S, Cherry JD: Molecular pathogenesis, epidemiology, and clinical manifestations of respiratory infections due to Bordetella pertussis and other Bordetella subspecies. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005, 18: 326-382. 10.1128/CMR.18.2.326-382.2005.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. von Wintzingerode F, Schattke A, Siddiqui RA, Rösick U, Göbel UB, Gross R: Bordetella petrii sp. nov., isolated from an anaerobic bioreactor, and emended description of the genus Bordetella. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001, 51: 1257-1265.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Gerlach G, von Wintzingerode F, Middendorf B, Gross R: Evolutionary trends in the genus Bordetella. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3: 61-72. 10.1016/S1286-4579(00)01353-8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Bianchi F, Careri M, Mustat L, Malcevschi A, Musci M: Bioremediation of toluene and naphthalene: development and validation of a GC-FID method for their monitoring. Ann Chim. 2005, 95: 515-524. 10.1002/adic.200590061.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang F, Grundmann S, Schmid M, Dörfler U, Roherer S, Charles Munch J, Hartmann A, Jiang X, Schroll R: Isolation and characterization of 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene mineralizing Bordetella sp. and its bioremediation potential in soil. Chemosphere. 2007, 67: 896-902. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.11.019.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Fry NK, Duncan J, Malnick H, Warner M, Smith AJ, Jackson MS, Ayoub A: Bordetella petrii clinical isolate. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 1131-1133.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Stark D, Riley LA, Harkness J, Marriott D: Bordetella petrii from a clinical sample in Australia: isolation and molecular identification. J Med Microbiol. 2007, 56: 435-437. 10.1099/jmm.0.46976-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Spilker T, Liwienski AA, LiPuma JJ: Identification of Bordetella spp. in respiratory specimens from individuals with cystic fibrosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008, 14: 504-506. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.01968.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Diavatopoulos DA, Cummings CA, Heide van der HG, van Gent M, Liew S, Relman DA, Mooi FR: Characterization of a highly conserved island in the otherwise divergent Bordetella holmesii and Bordetella pertussis genomes. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 8385-8394. 10.1128/JB.01081-06.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Parkhill J, Sebaihia M, Preston A, Murphy LD, Thomson N, Harris DE, Holden MT, Churcher CM, Bentley SD, Mungall KL, et al: Comparative analysis of the genome sequences of Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis and Bordetella bronchiseptica. Nat Genet. 2003, 35: 32-40. 10.1038/ng1227.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Gross R, Guzman CA, Sebaihia M, dos Santos VA, Pieper DH, Koebnik R, Lechner M, Bartels D, Buhrmester J, Choudhuri JV, Ebensen T, et al: The missing link: Bordetella petrii is endowed with both the metabolic versatility of environmental bacteria and virulence traits of pathogenic Bordetellae. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 449-10.1186/1471-2164-9-449.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Gaillard M, Vallaeys T, Vorhölter FJ, Minoia M, Werlen C, Sentchilo V, Pühler A, Meer van der JR: The clc element of Pseudomonas sp. strain B13, a genomic island with various catabolic properties. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 1999-2013. 10.1128/JB.188.5.1999-2013.2006.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Sentchilo V, Czechowska K, Pradervand N, Minoia M, Miyazaki R, Meer van der JR: Intracellular excision and reintegration dynamics of the ICEclc genomic island of Pseudomonas knackmussii sp. strain B. 13. Mol Microbiol. 2009, 72: 1293-1306. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06726.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Toussaint A, Merlin C, Monchy S, Benotmane MA, Leplae R, Mergeay M, Springael D: The biphenyl- and 4-chlorobiphenyl-catabolic transposon Tn4371, a member of a new family of genomic islands related to IncP and Ti plasmids. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003, 69 (8): 4837-4845. 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4837-4845.2003.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Porter JF, Wardlaw AC: Long-term survival of Bordetella bronchiseptica in lakewater and in buffered saline without added nutrients. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993, 110: 33-36. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb06291.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Burrus V, Pavlovic G, Decaris B, Guédon G: The ICESt1 element of Streptococcus thermophilus belongs to a large family of integrative and conjugative elements that exchange modules and change their specificity of integration. Plasmid. 2002, 48: 77-97. 10.1016/S0147-619X(02)00102-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Gaillard M, Pernet N, Vogne C, Hagenbüchle O, Meer van der JR: Host and invader impact of transfer of the clc genomic island into Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105: 7058-7063. 10.1073/pnas.0801269105.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Banemann A, Deppisch H, Gross R: The lipopolysaccharide of Bordetella bronchiseptica acts as a protective shield against antimicrobial peptides. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 5607-5612.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Ravatn R, Studer S, Springael D, Zehnder AJ, Meer van der JR: Chromosomal integration, tandem amplification, and deamplification in Pseudomonas putida F1 of a 105-kilobase genetic element containing the chlorocatechol degradative genes from Pseudomonas sp. Strain B13. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 4360-4369.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zee van der A, Mooi F, Van Embden J, Musser J: Molecular evolution and host adaptation of Bordetella spp.: phylogenetic analysis using multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and typing with three insertion sequences. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 6609-6617.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Buboltz AM, Nicholson TL, Parette MR, Hester SE, Parkhill J, Harvill ET: Replacement of adenylate cyclase toxin in a lineage of Bordetella bronchiseptica. J Bacteriol. 2008, 190: 5502-5511. 10.1128/JB.00226-08.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Monack DM, Arico B, Rappuoli R, Falkow S: Phase variants of Bordetella bronchiseptica arise by spontaneous deletions in the vir locus. Mol Microbiol. 1989, 3: 1719-1728. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1989.tb00157.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Gross R, Rappuoli R: Positive regulation of pertussis toxin expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988, 85: 3913-3917. 10.1073/pnas.85.11.3913.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rouillard JM, Zuker M, Gulari E: Design of oligonucleotide probes for DNA microarrays using a thermodynamic approach. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31: 3057-3062. 10.1093/nar/gkg426.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Middendorf B, Hochhut B, Leipold K, Dobrindt U, Blum-Oehler G, Hacker J: Instability of pathogenicity islands in uropathogenic Escherichia coli 536. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 3086-3096. 10.1128/JB.186.10.3086-3096.2004.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Lechner et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.