Open Access

Effects of disruption of heat shock genes on susceptibility of Escherichia coli to fluoroquinolones

  • Yuko Yamaguchi1,
  • Toshifumi Tomoyasu1,
  • Akiko Takaya1,
  • Mizue Morioka2 and
  • Tomoko Yamamoto1Email author
BMC Microbiology20033:16

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-3-16

Received: 19 March 2003

Accepted: 12 August 2003

Published: 12 August 2003

Abstract

Background

It is well known that expression of certain bacterial genes responds rapidly to such stimuli as exposure to toxic chemicals and physical agents. It is generally believed that the proteins encoded in these genes are important for successful survival of the organism under the hostile conditions. Analogously, the proteins induced in bacterial cells exposed to antibiotics are believed to affect the organisms' susceptibility to these agents.

Results

We demonstrated that Escherichia coli cells exposed to levofloxacin (LVFX), a fluoroquinolone (FQ), induce the syntheses of heat shock proteins and RecA. To examine whether the heat shock proteins affect the bactericidal action of FQs, we constructed E. coli strains with mutations in various heat shock genes and tested their susceptibility to FQs. Mutations in dnaK, groEL, and lon increased this susceptibility; the lon mutant exhibited the greatest effects. The increased susceptibility of the lon mutant was corroborated by experiments in which the gene encoding the cell division inhibitor, SulA, was subsequently disrupted. SulA is induced by the SOS response and degraded by the Lon protease. The findings suggest that the hypersusceptibility of the lon mutant to FQs could be due to abnormally high levels of SulA protein resulting from the depletion of Lon and the continuous induction of the SOS response in the presence of FQs.

Conclusion

The present results show that the bactericidal action of FQs is moderately affected by the DnaK and GroEL chaperones and strongly affected by the Lon protease. FQs have contributed successfully to the treatment of various bacterial infections, but their widespread use and often misuse, coupled with emerging resistance, have gradually compromised their utility. Our results suggest that agents capable of inhibiting the Lon protease have potential for combination therapy with FQs.

Background

FQs are broad-spectrum agents applicable to a range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections, and they have good oral absorbability [6]. Because of these advantages, FQs have been widely used against a variety of bacterial infections for about two decades. They target the type II topoisomerases, DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, which are essential for controlling the topological state of DNA during replication and transcription [12].

Bacteria are known to respond to unfavorable conditions, e.g., exposure to toxic chemicals and physical agents, nutrient limitation, or sudden increase in growth temperature, by rapid expression of regulons related to the heat shock, SOS, and oxidative stress responses. DNA damage by UV irradiation, or treatment with naldixic acid, induce both the SOS and heat shock responses [9, 19]. Puromycin has been reported to induce first the SOS and secondly the heat shock responses; hydrogen peroxide induces the oxidative stress and SOS responses; and CdCl2 strongly induces all three stress responses. Protein induction by these responses is widely believed to be important for the organism's survival under hostile conditions. Analogously, the proteins induced when bacterial cells are exposed to antibiotics may affect the susceptibility of the organisms to these agents.

The aim of present study was to identify the bacterial responses affecting the bactericidal action of FQs. We analyzed the proteins induced in Escherichia coli by exposure to FQs, then examined the susceptibilities to these agents of E. coli strains with mutations in the genes encoding these proteins.

Results and Discussion

Analysis of protein synthesis in E. coli exposed to levofloxacin

Figure 1(A) shows a profile of proteins in E. coli cells that were pulse-labeled after incubation for 10 min with different concentrations of LVFX. The results show a large increase in synthesis of 70 kDa (a), 60 kDa (b), and 40 kDa proteins (c) at 10 μg/ml LVFX. These proteins were also induced by lower concentrations of LVFX, but increasing concentrations increased the rate of synthesis. Comparison of the protein profiles of LVFX-treated, temperature-shifted (42°C) and unshifted (30°C) bacteria indicates that the 70 kDa (a) and 60 kDa (b) bands may be heat shock proteins. Figures 1(B) and 1(C) show the time-course of synthesis of these proteins after incubation with 10 μg/ml LVFX for 60 min. Synthesis of the 70 kDa and 60 kDa proteins appears to have accelerated for 15 min and then stopped. In contrast, induction of the 40 kDa protein continued up to 45 min after exposure to LVFX, suggesting that the induction mechanism is different from that for the 70 and 60 kDa proteins.
Figure 1

Proteins synthesized in E. coli exposed to LVFX. (A) Exponentially-growing cells were incubated with 1, 2, or 10 μg/ml of LVFX for 10 min and then labeled with [35S]-methionine and cysteine for 1 min at 30°C. Heat shock culture was prepared as described in Methods. (B) After incubation with 10 μg/ml of LVFX, aliquots (100 μl) of the cultures were taken at indicated times and labeled for 1 min at 30°C. Equal amounts of acid-precipitable counts were applied to each lane and the proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. The gels were dried and then exposed to films (A and B). The protein bands alphabetized in (B) were quantified using a BAS2000A image analyzer and the relative rates of synthesis are shown in (C).

The proteins were separated on two-dimensional gels to facilitate identification (Figure 2). Visual scanning of the autoradiogram showed that synthesis of at least 16 proteins was markedly elevated in bacterial cells exposed to LVFX compared with untreated cells. The spots numbered on the gel are proteins that could be identified by mass spectrometric analysis. Among these, heat shock proteins are identified as follows: ClpB (spot 1), DnaK (spot 2), GroEL (spot 3), HtpG (spot 4), HslU (spot 5) and GrpE (spot 6). Enhanced production of the small heat shock proteins GroES, IbpA, and IbpB was also observed when 12.5 % SDS-PAGE was used as the second dimension (results not shown). Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (spot 7) and phosphoglycerate kinase (spot 8) were also identified.
Figure 2

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis patterns of proteins synthesized in E. coli exposed to LVFX. Bacterial cells were exposed to 10 μg/ml of LVFX for 15 min and then pulse-labeled for 1 min. A portion of the protein samples from untreated cells (A) or LVFX-treated cells (B) was subjected to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis using 10 % SDS-polyacrylamide gel as the second dimension. Spots enclosed in circles represent the proteins induced during exposure to LVFX. The proteins numbered are interpreted in the text.

The 40 kDa protein showing the most marked induction in Figure 1 does not appear on the two-dimensional gel (Figure 2). We therefore fractionated the proteins from LVFX treated E. coli cells along with those from control cells. As shown in Figure 3, the 40 kDa protein seems to be largely associated with high salt-soluble proteins (lanes 6 and 8). A portion of the high salt-soluble fraction was separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis; the spot corresponding to the LVFX-induced 40 kDa protein was subjected to mass spectrometric analysis and identified as RecA. RecA is usually cytosolic in E. coli and binds to single-stranded regions of damaged DNA [14]. Detection of a large amount of RecA protein in the high salt-soluble fraction suggests that when it is synthesized in abnormally large amounts, it aggregates with various denatured and misfolded proteins.
Figure 3

Fractionation of proteins synthesized in E. coli exposed to LVFX. Proteins from cultures labeled in the presence of 10 μg/ml LVFX were fractionated as described in Methods and separated by SDS-PAGE (A). The protein samples from untreated cells were run in lanes 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9. The samples from LVFX-treated cells were in lanes 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10. Lanes contain protein fractions as follows: lanes 1 and 2, whole cell lysates; lanes 3 and 4, cytoplasmic and periplasmic protein fractions; lanes 5 and 6, membrane-associated protein fractions. The membrane-associated proteins were solubilized in 1 M NaCl and then dialyzed described in Methods. After centrifugation, the pellets were solubilized in lysis buffer and applied in lanes 7 and 8. The supernatants were applied in lanes 9 and 10. Portions of the protein samples applied in lanes 7 and 8 were also subjected to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and the results are shown in (B) and (C), respectively.

In E. coli, the expression of heat shock genes is positively regulated at the transcriptional level by the heat shock specific sigma subunit of RNA polymerase, σ32. In addition, the heat shock response is negatively autoregulated by the DnaK chaperone machine that interferes with the efficient binding of σ32 to the RNA polymerase core, turning off the response [2, 4, 16]. Heat-induced aggregation of proteins induces the expression of the heat shock regulon through the titration of the DnaK chaperone by the aggregates [4, 16]. Therefore, in these experiments, the induction of the E. coli heat shock regulon could have been triggered by protein aggregates accumulated after incubation with LVFX.

Antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli strains with mutations in heat shock genes

The heat shock proteins comprise chaperones such as the DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE, GroEL/GroES and IbpA/IbpB systems, and ATP-dependent proteases such as Lon, ClpXP and HslVU. Whereas the chaperones are abundantly synthesized, the levels of the proteases are relatively low even under inducing conditions. In these experiments, proteases were not present in sufficient amounts to identify by mass spectrometry in LVFX-treated cells. However, all the heat shock genes in one regulon under the control of σ32 would be simultaneously induced in cells exposed to LVFX.

To examine the involvement of heat shock proteins in the susceptibility of E. coli to FQs, we constructed strains with mutations in various heat shock genes and then tested their susceptibility to LVFX (Figure 4A and 4B). Among the chaperone mutants, ΔdnaK and groEL- exhibited increased susceptibility. However, a mutation in the small chaperone, IbpAB, did not affect susceptibility. Among the protease mutants, ΔclpP, ΔclpX, ΔclpA, ΔhslVU and ΔhtrA all showed the same susceptibility to LVFX as the wild type. In contrast, Δlon showed a greatly increased susceptibility. This hypersusceptibility of the Δlon mutant was corroborated by providing a functional lon using a low copy-number-vector (Figure 4C and 4D). The results suggest that the hypersensitivity of the strain to LVFX is largely due to the disruption of lon. Δlon showed a similarly increased sensitivity to other FQs such as ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin and sitafloxacin (data not shown). As expected, a mutation in rpoH, which encodes σ32, also resulted in increased susceptibility of E. coli to LVFX.
Figure 4

Susceptibility of chaperone- or protease-deficient mutants of E. coli to LVFX. Bacterial cultures were diluted from 10-3 to 10-7 and then spotted on to agar plates prepared by the standard agar doubling dilution method. (A) and (C) are the results with drug-free agar plates. (B) and (D) are the results with agar plates containing 0.0125 μg/ml LVFX. Abbreviation: plon+, a complementing plasmid carrying the intact lon gene [15].

Chaperones and proteases are essential for de novo folding and quality control of proteins, acting by preventing protein aggregation and by refolding or degrading misfolded proteins. Therefore, the increased susceptibility of the chaperone and lon mutants can partly be explained by the disruption of the quality control system in E. coli cytosol.

Effect of sulA-disruption on the hypersusceptibility of the Δlon mutant to fluoroquinolones

The Lon protease degrades SulA, which inhibits separation by binding to FtsZ, a key cell division protein [1]. SulA is a SOS response protein induced by DNA damage after UV-irradiation and quinolone-treatment [23]. We examined the possibility that the hypersensitivity of the Δlon mutant is due to the accumulation of SulA protein. The sulA gene was disrupted in both wild-type and Δlon-mutant cells and then the resultant double mutants were compared for susceptibility to LVFX. As shown in Figure 5, the hypersusceptibility of Δlon was suppressed by the subsequent disruption of sulA, suggesting that the increased sensitivity is due to the inhibition of cell division by abnormal accumulation of SulA. It therefore appears that in Δlon, depletion of the Lon protease and continuous induction of the SOS response in the presence of LVFX result in abnormally high levels of the cell division inhibitor SulA. Complementation analysis also indicates that continuous induction of SulA by FQs contributes to quinolone killing. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that the ΔsulA mutant is less sensitive to LVFX than the wild type (Figure 5). Moreover, disruption of lon did not affect the susceptibility of bacteria to antibiotics other than quinolones, such as ampicillin, cephalothin, streptomycin, polymixin-B or rifampicin (our unpublished data).
Figure 5

Susceptibility of E. coli Δ lon and Δ sulA double mutant to LVFX. (A), (B), (C) and (D) show the results of spot testing with agar plates containing 0 μg/ml, 0.0125 μg/ml, 0.025 μg/ml and 0.05 μg/ml LVFX, respectively.

Effect of the lon mutation in fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants

Bacterial quinolone resistance is usually due to mutations in the genes for targets of these agents: DNA gyrase encoded by gyrA and gyrB, and topoisomerase IV encoded by parC and parE. In several species of Enterobacteriaceae, decreased susceptibility or resistance to FQs is associated with specific point mutations in gyrA [21, 22]. An additional mutation in parC results in greater resistance [10, 20]. We examined whether the Δlon mutation affects the resistance to LVFX in E. coli gyrA and parC mutants.

In Figure 6, strain CS5086 has a gyrA mutation (Ser83 to Leu). To construct a gyrA and parC double mutant, CS5086 was initially treated with mini F-parC1 (Gly78 to Asp, Val253 to Ile). Then the chromosomal parC gene of the resultant strain was replaced with parC::Cm by P1 transduction; lon was subsequently disrupted in both the gyrA and the gyrA, parC1 mutants. As shown in Figure 6, Δlon decreased the resistance of both gyrA and gyrA, parC1 to LVFX.
Figure 6

Levels of LVFX-resistance of E. coli gyrA, Δ lon and gyrA, parC , Δ lon mutants. (A), (B), (C) and (D) show the results of spot testing with the agar plates containing 0 μg/ml, 0.0125 μg/ml, 0.025 μg/ml, and 0.10 μg/ml LVFX, respectively. Bacterial strains used are as follows: a, W3110 (lon+) and CS5140 (Δlon); b, CS5086 (lon+) and CS5216 (Δlon); c, CS5217 (lon+) and CS5218 (Δlon).

Effect of recA mutation on susceptibility of E. coli to fluoroquinolone

Since one of the proteins strongly induced by LVFX is RecA (Figure 1 and Figure 3), the role of RecA in the bactericidal action of the agent was examined by susceptibility testing of a E. coli recA mutant along with the isogenic wild type. Figure 7 shows that the recA mutation increases the susceptibility of E. coli to LVFX. RecA positively regulates the SOS response, which includes amplification of RecA, UvrA/UvrB (excision repair enzyme), and SulA (cell division inhibitor). Although the continuous induction of the SOS response by quinolones is harmful to wild type cells, synthesis of RecA and UvrA/UvrB, which repair quinolone-induced DNA damage, are prerequisites for withstanding the bactericidal action of quinolones.
Figure 7

Susceptibility of recA mutant to LVFX. (A), (B), (C), and (D) show the results of spot testing with the agar plates containing 0 μg/ml, 0.0032 μg/ml, 0.0063 μg/ml, and 0.0125 μg/ml of LVFX, respectively.

Conclusion

The present results show that the DnaK and GroEL chaperones have moderate effects on the antimicrobial activity of FQs. These chaperones might contribute to quinolone resistance because they sequester the aggregates that accumulate in cells exposed to FQs. Lon protease markedly affects the bactericidal action of FQs, as indicated by the hypersusceptibility of the lon mutant. This increased susceptibility is corroborated by the effects of subsequent disruption of the gene encoding SulA. SulA protein is induced by the SOS response and degraded by Lon. Collectively, the results suggest that the hypersusceptibility of the lon mutant to FQs could be due to abnormal accumulation of SulA, which is depeleted by Lon, and the continuous induction of the SOS response.

FQs have contributed successfully to the treatment of various bacterial infections because of their broad-spectrum, potent antimicrobial activity and ease of oral administration. However, their widespread use and often misuse, coupled with emerging resistance, have gradually compromised their utility. The present work suggests that agents capable of inhibiting the Lon protease have potential for combination therapy with FQs.

Methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids

Bacterial strains used are shown in Table 1. Protease mutant alleles were introduced by P1 transduction into a W3110 background, generating strains CS5137 (clpP::Cm), CS5138 (clpX::Km), CS5139 (clpA::Km), CS5168 (hslV::Tc) or CS5140 (lon::miniTn10). For these transductions, P1 phages were propagated on MC4100 derivatives carrying the corresponding mutations [7, 17]. Strains CS5213 (sulA::Tn5) and CS5314 (ibpA::Km) were constructed by transduction of W3110 with P1 phage propagated in strains GC2597 [3] and OW6/ibpA::Km [8], respectively. To construct strain CS5217, CS5086 cells were initially transformed with plasmid pJK282-parC1 and then the parC gene was inactivated by P1-mediated transduction with DNS5101CR [10] as a donor. The lon gene of strain CS5217 was inactivated by P1 transduction, resulting in strain CS5218.
Table 1

Escherichia coli strains used in this study

Strain

Relevant characteristics

Reference/ source

W3110

F-λ- rph1

Our collection

MC4100

F- araD139 Δ(argF-lac)U169 rpsL150 relA1 flbB5301 deoC1 ptsF25 rbsR

Our collection

B178

W3110 galE

5

C600 Sm

F- lacY leu str supE thi thr tonA

 

C600 Sm recA

C600 Sm recA1

 

CS5137

W3110 clpP::Cm

This study

CS5138

W3110 clpX::Km

This study

CS5139

W3110 clpA::Km

This study

CS5168

W3110 hslV::Tc

This study

CS5140

W3110 lon::miniTn10

This study

BB1553

MC4100 dnaK::cat sidB1

2

BB2395

MC4100 lon146::miniTn10

17

BB7222

Same as in MC4100 but araD+

17

BB7224

BB7222 rpoH::Km zhf::Tn10 suhX1401

17

NRK117

MC4100 groEL44 zie::Tn10

11

NRK233

MC4100 groES619 zie::Tn10

11

CG1023

B178 htrA::miniTn10

13

CS5086

CSH2 gyrA

Our collection

CS5213

W3110 sulA::Tn5

This study

CS5214

CS5213 lon::miniTn10

This study

CS5216

CS5086 lon::miniTn10

This study

CS5217

CS5086 parC::Cm harboring pJK282-parC1

This study

CS5218

CS5217 lon::miniTn10

This study

CS5314

W3110 ibpA::Km

This study

Antibiotics

Levofloxacin was kindly provided by Daiichi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. [Tokyo, Japan].

Labeling of proteins producing in bacteria exposed to LVFX or heat shock

Bacterial cells grown in M9-medium [17] to mid-exponential growth phase were inoculated with LVFX and incubated at 30°C. Cells were labeled with 3.7 Mbq/ml of [35S]-Met and Cys (Protein labeling mix, >37Tbq/mmol, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, U.K.) for 1 min, mixed with TCA (final concentration 5%) and chilled on ice for 15 min. After centrifugation at 16000 g for 2 min, the pellets were washed with acetone and resuspended in sample buffer [18]. The labeling of the heat shock proteins was performed as follows: bacterial cells in mid-exponential growth phase were transferred from 30°C to 42°C, incubated for 10 min and then labeled for 5 min at 42°C.

Resolution and quantitative estimation of proteins

The radiolabeled proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as described previously [18]. The radioactivities incorporated into proteins were quantified using a BAS2000A photoimager (Fuji Film Co. [Tokyo, Japan])

Identification of proteins

Proteins were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and the protein spots of interest were excised from the gels and subjected to matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry according to the procedure described previously [15].

Fractionation of Proteins

Aliquots (10 ml) of cultures were rapidly cooled in an ice-water bath and centrifuged for 10 min at 5000 g to harvest the cells. Pellets were washed with saline and resuspended in 50 μl of buffer A (50 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, 20 % sucrose, 1 μg/ml lysozyme) and incubated for 30 min on ice. Cell lysis was performed by addition of 450 μl of buffer B [50 mM Tris-acetate, pH 7.4, 5 mM EDTA, protease inhibitor cocktail (SIGMA [St. Louis, Mo.]) and mixing, followed by sonication with a Branson Sonifier 200. Intact cells were removed by centrifugation at 5000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was used as a cytoplasmic and periplasmic protein fraction. The pellet containing membrane-associated and -integral proteins was resuspended in 80 μl of buffer B containing 1 M NaCl and centrifuged at 100000 g for 1 h at 4°C. The supernatant, containing membrane-associated proteins, was dialyzed against buffer C (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 mM EDTA, 10 % Glycerol, 0.1 mM DTT).

Susceptibility testing

Bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics was determined by the twofold standard agar dilution method, except that bacterial cultures were diluted from 10-3 to 10-7 in buffered saline containing 0.01 % of gelatine.

Author's contributions

YY analyzed the LVFX-related proteins, constructed some of mutants, and performed the susceptibility testing. TT constructed some of mutants and conducted the experiments with them. AT conducted the mass spectrometric analysis of the LVFX-related proteins. MM identified RecA protein by mass spectrometric analysis. TY opened the project here and prepared the submitted manuscript.

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University
(2)
Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo

References

  1. Bi E, Lutkenhaus J: Cell division inhibitors SulA and MinCD prevent formation of the FtsZ ring. J Bactertiol. 1993, 175: 1118-1125.Google Scholar
  2. Bukau B, Walker G: Mutations altering heat shock specific subunit of RNA polymerase suppress major cellular defects of E. coli mutants lacking the DnaK chaperone. EMBO J. 1990, 9: 4024-4036.Google Scholar
  3. Elledge K, Walker GC: Proteins required for ultraviolet light and chemical mutagenesis. Identification of the products of the umuC locus of Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1983, 164: 175-192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Gamer J, Bujard H, Bukau B: Physical interaction between heat shock proteins DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE and the bacterial heat shock transcription factor σ32. Cell. 1992, 69: 833-842.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Georgopoulos CP: Bacterial mutants in which the gene N of bacteriophage lambda is blocked have an altered RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1971, 68: 2977-2981.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hooper DC: Clinical applications of quinolones. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998, 1400: 45-61. 10.1016/S0167-4781(98)00127-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kanemori M, Nishimura K, Yanagi H, Yura T: Synergistic roles of HslVU and other ATP-dependent proteases in controlling in vivo turnover of σ32 and abnormal proteins in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 7219-7225.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kitagawa M, Matsumura Y, Tuchido T: Small heat shock proteins, IbpA and IbpB, are involved in resistance to heat and superoxide stresses in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Let. 2000, 184: 165-171. 10.1016/S0378-1097(00)00038-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Krueger JH, Walker G: groEL and dnaK genes of Escherichia coli are induced by UV irradiation and nalidixic acid in an htpR+-dependent fashion. Proc Natl Acd Sci USA. 1984, 81: 1499-1503.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Kumagai Y, Kato J, Hoshino K, Akasaka T, Sato K, Ikeda H: Quinolone-resistant mutations of Escherichia coli DNA topoisomerase IV parC gene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996, 40: 710-714.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kusukawa N, Yura T, Ueguchi C, Akiyama Y, Ito K: Effects of mutations in heat-shock genes groES and groEL on protein export in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 1989, 8: 3517-3521.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Levine C, Hiasa H, Marians KJ: DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV: biochemical activities, physiological roles during chromosome replication, and drug sensitivities. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998, 1400: 29-43. 10.1016/S0167-4781(98)00126-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lipinska B, Fayet O, Bard L, Georgopoulos C: Identification, characterization, and mapping of the Escherichia coli htrA gene, whose product is essential for bacterial growth only at elevated temperatures. J Bacteriol. 1989, 171: 1574-1584.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Little JW, Mount DW: The SOS regulatory system of Escherichia coli. Cell. 1982, 29: 11-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Takaya A, Tomoyasu T, Tokumitsu A, Morioka M, Yamamoto T: The ATP-Dependent Lon Protease of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Regulates Invasion and Expression of Genes Carried on Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 224-232. 10.1128/JB.184.1.224-232.2002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tilly K, McKittrick N, Zylicz M, Georgopoulos C: The dnaK protein modulates the heat-shock response of Escherichia coli. Cell. 1983, 34: 641-646.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tomoyasu T, Mogk A, Langen H, Goloubinoff P, Bukau B: Genetic dissection of the roles of chaperones and proteases in protein folding and degradation in the Escherichia coli cytosol. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 40: 397-413. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02383.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Tomoyasu T, Ohkishi T, Ukyo Y, Tokumitsu A, Takaya A, Suzuki M, Sekiya K, Matsui H, Kutsukake K, Yamamoto T: The ClpXP ATP-dependent protease regulates flagellum synthesis in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 645-653.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. VanBogelen RA, Kelley PM, Neidhardt FC: Differential induction of heat shock, SOS, and oxidation stress regulons and accumulation of nucleotides in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1987, 169: 26-32.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vila J, Ruiz J, GonI P, Jimenez de Anta MT: Detection of mutations in parC in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996, 40: 491-493.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Weigel LM, Steward CD, Tenover FC: gyrA mutations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance in eight species of Enterobacteriacea e. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998, 42: 2661-2667.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yoshida H, Kojima T, Yamagishi J, Nakamura S: Quinolone resistant mutations of the gyrA gene of Escherichia coli. Mol Gen Genet. 1988, 211: 1-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ysern P, Clerch B, Castaño M, Gibert I, Barbé J, Llagostera M: Induction of SOS genes in Escherichia coli and mutagenesis in Salmonella typhimurium by fluoroquinolones. Mutagenesis. 1990, 5: 63-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yamaguchi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.