Open Access

Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics associated with biofilm formation in clinical isolates of atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (aEPEC) strains

  • Heloisa H Nascimento1,
  • Lucas EP Silva1,
  • Renata T Souza1,
  • Neusa P Silva2 and
  • Isabel CA Scaletsky1Email author
BMC Microbiology201414:184

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-184

Received: 19 June 2013

Accepted: 4 July 2014

Published: 10 July 2014

Abstract

Background

Biofilm formation by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) have been recently described in the prototype typical EPEC E2348/69 strain and in an atypical EPEC O55:H7 strain. In this study, we sought to evaluate biofilm formation in a collection of 126 atypical EPEC strains isolated from 92 diarrheic and 34 nondiarrheic children, belonging to different serotypes. The association of biofilm formation and adhesin-related genes were also investigated.

Results

Biofilm formation occurred in 37 (29%) strains of different serotypes, when the assays were performed at 26°C and 37°C for 24 h. Among these, four strains (A79, A87, A88, and A111) formed a stronger biofilm than did the others. The frequency of biofilm producers was higher among isolates from patients compared with isolates from controls (34.8% vs 14.7%; P = 0.029). An association was found between biofilm formation and expression of type 1 fimbriae and curli (P < 0.05). Unlike the previously described aEPEC O55:H7, one aEPEC O119:HND strain (A111) formed a strong biofilm and pellicle at the air-liquid interface, but did not express curli. Transposon mutagenesis was used to identify biofilm-deficient mutants. Transposon insertion sequences of six mutants revealed similarity with type 1 fimbriae (fimC, fimD, and fimH), diguanylate cyclase, ATP synthase F1, beta subunit (atpD), and the uncharacterized YjiC protein. All these mutants were deficient in biofilm formation ability.

Conclusion

This study showed that the ability to adhere to abiotic surfaces and form biofilm is present in an array of aEPEC strains. Moreover, it seems that the ability to form biofilms is associated with the presence of type 1 fimbriae and diguanylate cyclase. Characterization of additional biofilm formation mutants may reveal other mechanisms involved in biofilm formation and bring new insights into aEPEC adhesion and pathogenesis.

Keywords

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Biofilm formation Type 1 pili

Background

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) is an important cause of infantile diarrhea, particularly in developing countries [1]. EPEC causes protracted and chronic diarrhea, and the severity of this disease may require extensive hospitalization [24]. The majority of EPEC isolates belong to classic serotypes derived from 12 classical O serogroups (O26, O55, O86, O111, O114, O119, O125, O126, O127, O128, O142, and O158) [5, 6]. A key characteristic of EPEC strains is the ability to intimately attach to intestinal epithelial cells and form attaching and effacing (AE) lesions. These lesions are characterized by the destruction of the microvilli and the rearrangement of the cytoskeleton, culminating in a pedestal-like structure at the site of bacterial contact [7]. The AE genes are localized to the locus for enterocyte effacement (LEE) and encode intimin, a type III secretion system, secreted proteins (Esp) and the translocated intimin receptor [810]. Another EPEC characteristic is the formation of microcolonies on cell monolayers “in vitro”, a pattern known as localized adherence (LA) [11]. EPEC forms microcolonies on cultured epithelial cells, cultures of pediatric small intestinal tissue, and biopsy samples from EPEC patients [12, 13].

“Typical” EPEC (tEPEC) also contains the EPEC adherence factor (EAF) plasmid [14], which carries genes encoding a regulator (per) [15] and the bundle-forming pili (BFP) [16] that mediates LA to epithelial cells. EPEC strains, lacking the EAF plasmid are deprived of BFP, and have been designated “atypical” EPEC (aEPEC) [17]. aEPEC strains can still adhere to HEp-2 cells in a localized adherence-like pattern (LAL), forming loose bacterial microcolonies [18]. Recent epidemiological studies indicate that aEPEC is more prevalent than tEPEC in both developed and developing countries [1].

The aEPEC strains are genetically related to the enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), and both are considered emerging pathogens [19]. Some previous studies showed that certain EHEC strains have the abilities to attach, colonize, and form biofilm on various surfaces [2024]. Some adhesins such as type 1 pilus (T1P), flagella, HCP (“hemorrhagic coli pilus”), curli, antigen 43 (Ag43), calcium-binding antigen 43 homologue (Cah), and autotransporter protein of EHEC (EhaA) have been implicated in the formation of microcolonies and biofilms [2024]. Even though EPEC form microcolonies and causes persistent infections, very little is known regarding biofilm formation by EPEC strains, and their survival outside the host.

Recently, Moreira et al. [25] published the first description of biofilm formation by the prototype tEPEC E2348/69 (O127:H6) strain. These researchers found that adhesive structures, such as type 1 fimbriae, Ag43, BFP, and EspA, were expressed during the initial stages of biofilm development. More recently, Weiss-Muszkat et al. [26] reported a multicellular behavior characterized by the formation of a robust biofilm on an abiotic surface at 26°C, but not at 37°C, a dense pellicle at the air-liquid interface and a red, dry, and rough (rdar) morphotype in one O55:H7 aEPEC strain. Transposon mutagenesis analysis identified curli fibers and the Crl regulator as important participants in the formation of all three types of biofilms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of biofilm formation in a collection of 126 aEPEC strains isolated from diarrheic and nondiarrhiec children. The presence of adhesins related to biofilm formation and the association of biofilm formation and these adhesins were also investigated.

Results and discussion

A total of 126 EPEC strains isolated from 92 children with diarrhea and 34 asymptomatic controls were examined for the capacity of biofilm formation. As shown in Table 1, biofilm formation occurred in 37 (29.4%) of strains of different serotypes after 24 h of incubation at 26°C and 37°C. The frequency of biofilm producers was higher among isolates from patients compared to isolates from controls (34.8% vs 14.7%; P = 0.029). Most of the biofilm-producing strains formed biofilms on an abiotic surface at 26°C (Figure 1A), but not at 37°C (Figure 1B). Among these, four strains (A79, A87, A88, and A111) formed a stronger biofilm than did the others.
Table 1

Biofilm formation in 126 clinical isolates of aEPEC strains

Serotype

No. of strains (total/biofilm producers)a

 

Patients

Controls

Total

EPEC serotypes

   
 

O26:H11;HND

9/2

1/0

10/2

 

O55:HND

4/1

1/0

5/1

 

O111:NM

2/1

2/1

4/2

 

O114:NM

0

1/0

1/0

 

O119:H2;HND

9/4

1/0

10/4

 

O125:HND

0

1/0

1/0

 

O126:NM

1/1

0

1/1

 

O127:NM;H40

4/2

1/0

5/2

 

O128:NM

2/0

0

2/0

 

O142:NM;H2

10/1

0

10/1

Non-EPEC serotypesb

23/5

12/2

35/7

ONT:H18/NM; HND

28/15

14/2

42/17

Total

92/32

34/5c

126/37

aBiofilm assays were performed in 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates in Luria broth and incubated for 24 h at 26°C and 37°C.

bO4:HND; O15:HND O33:H6; O35:H19; O37:HND; O49:HND; O61:HND; O63:HND; O79:HND; O85:H40; O96:HND; O98:HND; O101:HNM; O103:HNM; O105:H7; O108:H31; O109:H54; O117:HND; 0132:HND; O141:HND; O1523H2; O156:H16; O157:NM; O167:H6; O169:H6; O175:HND.

CP < 0.05 (patients x controls).

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-14-184/MediaObjects/12866_2013_Article_2324_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Biofilm formation on 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates by representative biofilm-producing aEPEC strains. Strains were incubated in LB broth for 24 h at 26°C (A) and 37°C (B), and classified as biofilm producers when OD570 was higher than the E. coli HB101 strain mean value (OD570 ≤ 0.5). Data are from a representative experiment with three replicates. The bars represent the standard deviation.

As shown in Table 2, the fimA/fimH genes were identified in 27 (73%) strains, and the expression of type 1 fimbriae, was identified in all of them by MSHA assays. The genes related to curli (csgA and crl) were identified in 17 (45.9%) strains, and all of them expressed curli as judged by characteristic red-colonies formed on CR agar plates. In addition, 18 of strains formed a thick pellicle at the air-liquid interface at 26°C and 37°C. The flagella gene (fliC) was identified in 11 (29.8%) strains. The genes related to the autotransporter proteins Ag43 (flu), Cah (cah), and EhaA (ehaA) occurred in 9 (24.3%), 7 (18.9%), 5 (13.5%) strains, respectively. The gene hcpA was identified in two strains.
Table 2

Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of aEPEC biofilm-producing strains

Strain

Serotype

Source

Biofilm formation

Expression of adhesins

Adhesin gene sequences

   

Abiotic surface

Air-liquid interface

Curli

T1Fa

       
   

26°C

37°C

26°C

37°C

26°C

37°C

 

fimA

fliC

csgA

hcpA

flu

cah

ehaA

A91

O15:HND

Patient

+

-

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

-

-

A72

O26:HND

Patient

+

-

+

-

-

+

-

-

+

+

-

+

-

-

A132

O26:HND

Patient

+

-

+

-

-

-

+

+

+

-

-

+

-

-

A113

O55:HND

Patient

+

-

+

-

-

-

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

-

A15

O85:H40

Patient

-

+

-

-

-

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

+

A28

O103:NM

Patient

-

+

-

-

-

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

+

-

A4

O111:NM

Control

-

+

-

-

-

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

-

+

A12

O111:NM

Patient

+

-

-

+

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

A60

O119:H2

Patient

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

A67

O119:H2

Patient

-

+

-

+

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

A93

O119:HND

Patient

+

-

+

+

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

A111

O119:HND

Patient

+

-

+

+

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

A13

O126:NM

Patient

+

+

-

-

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

A5

O127:H40

Patient

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

-

A34

O127:NM

Patient

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

-

+

A47

O141:HND

Control

+

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

+

-

A11

O142:NM

Patient

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

-

A87

O153:H2

Patient

+

-

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

A36

O157:HND

Control

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

A92

O167:H6

Patient

+

-

+

-

+

-

+

+

-

+

-

-

-

-

A10

ONT:HND

Patient

-

+

-

-

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

A20

ONT:HND

Patient

+

+

-

-

-

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

-

-

A22

ONT:HND

Patient

-

+

-

-

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

A39

ONT:NM

Patient

+

+

-

-

-

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

-

-

A48

ONT:HND

Control

+

-

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

+

-

A49

ONT:HND

Patient

-

+

+

-

+

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

-

A68

ONT:HND

Patient

+

+

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

-

A73

ONT:HND

Control

+

-

-

-

-

-

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

A79

ONT:HND

Patient

+

+

+

-

-

-

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

A88

ONT:HND

Patient

+

-

+

+

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

A94

ONT:HND

Patient

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

+

-

A98

ONT:HND

Patient

+

-

-

-

-

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

-

+

A99

ONT:HND

Patient

+

+

-

+

-

-

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

+

A112

ONT:HND

Patient

+

+

+

-

-

-

+

+

-

-

-

-

-

-

A146

ONT:HND

Patient

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

-

+

-

-

A109

ONT:HND

Patient

+

-

+

+

+

-

-

-

-

+

-

-

-

-

A157

ONT:HND

Patient

+

+

+

+

-

-

+

+

+

-

+

+

-

-

Total no. of strains (n = 37)

30

21

18

11

8

14

27

27

11

17

2

9

7

5

aT1F, type 1 fimbriae.

In attempt to identify genes potentially involved in biofilm formation, we selected one strong biofilm producer, but curli-negative, strain A111 of serotype O119:HND for mutagenesis. Like a previously described aEPEC O55:H7 strain, the A111 strain formed a strong biofim on an abiotic surface at 26°C, but not at 37°C, and a dense pellicle at the air-liquid interface (Figure 2). We generated a transposon library in the A111 strain using the EZ::TN < R6Kyori/KAN-2 > Tnp transposome which confers resistance to kanamycin and screened the mutants for their capacity to produce biofilm. Among the 1,165-transposon mutants screened, eight biofilm deficient mutants were identified and compared to the wild type strain. All of them were deficient in their biofilm formation ability and did not form a pellicle at the air-liquid interface (data not shown). Identification of the transposon insertion sites was performed using PCR and sequence analysis. The DNA sequences of the mutants revealed similarity with type 1 fimbriae (three mutants; fimC, fimD, and fimH), diguanylate cyclase (one mutant, YP_006105849.1), ATP synthase F1, beta subunit (one mutant; atpD), and the uncharacterized YjiC protein (one mutant; YP_002394414.1). In two mutants the insertion site was too short for analysis.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1471-2180-14-184/MediaObjects/12866_2013_Article_2324_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Biofilm-formation ability of the A111 curli-negative strain. A - Pellicle formation at the air-liquid interface; B - SEM micrographs of the biofilm formed on glass coverslips.

This study showed that the ability to adhere to abiotic surfaces and form biofilm at low temperature is present in an array of aEPEC strains, and not restricted to a particular set of serotypes. In addition, our case control analysis showed an association between the biofilm-formation ability and diarrhea. These findings suggest that biofilm formation may play a role in the pathogenesis of some aEPEC strains.

A varied distribution of genes related to fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins reported in the literature to be associated with biofilm formation was identified among aEPEC strains. Recently, it has been shown that aEPEC strains harbor several pilus operons that could favor host colonization and environment survival [27]. In agreement with these findings, in our study, several adhesin genes were detected in most of the biofilm-producing strains. Interestingly, we observed an association between fimA/fimH genes and biofilm formation. Of the 37 biofilm producers, 27 (73%) carried the fimA/fimH genes versus 49 (55%) of 89 non-biofilm producers (P = 0.016). In addition, the curli genes, csgA and crl were found in 17 (46%) biofilm producers vs 28 (31%) non-biofilm producers (P = 0.041). No association was found between fliC, flu, cah, ehaA, or hcpA genes.

A recent study reported that the ability of an EPEC strain of serotype O55:H7 to produce biofilm at low temperature (26°C) was associated with curli [26]. In contrast, the A111 strain belonging to O119:HND formed a strong biofilm at 26°C pellicle at the air-liquid interface, but did not produce a red color on agar plates containing Congo red, implying that it does not produce curli. Three out of the six Tn5 mutants analyzed had insertions in genes associated with type 1 fimbriae. It seems that, in this particular strain, type 1 fimbriae plays an important role in the interaction with abiotic surfaces, as the inactivation of the fimC, fimD, and fimH genes, significantly reduced its capacity to form biofilm and pellicle. In agreement with our findings, it has been recently reported that a mutation in the fimA gene of an aEPEC strain drastically affected its ability to form biofilm on plastic surface [28].

In addition, in one mutant, the inactivation of diguanylate cyclase also impaired biofilm formation. Cellular levels of c-di-GMP, a ubiquitous second messenger in bacteria, are controlled through the opposing activities of diguanylate cyclases and phosphodiesterases. Cyclic-di-GMP antagonistically controls motility and virulence of single, planktonic cells on one hand, and cell adhesion and persistence of multicellular communities on the other [29].

Conclusion

This is the first study showing that the ability to adhere to abiotic surfaces and form biofilm is present in an array of aEPEC strains, and is not restricted to a particular set of serotypes. Our data suggest that type 1 fimbriae and diguanylate cyclase may be involved in aEPEC biofilm formation. Characterization of additional biofilm deficient mutants may reveal other mechanisms involved in biofilm formation and bring new insights into aEPEC pathogenesis.

Methods

Bacterial strains

The 126 aEPEC strains examined in this study belonged either to EPEC (n = 49) or non EPEC serotypes (n = 77), and were isolated during an epidemiological study of acute diarrhea in children under 2 years of age; the study was conducted in several cities of Brazil from 1999 through 2004 [30]. In the study, 1,102 stool specimens were obtained from children with diarrhea, presenting at the emergency room of public hospitals in seven cities representing different regions of Brazil, and 647 randomly selected children without any gastrointestinal symptoms from the same hospitals were studied. All strains were investigated for the presence of enteric pathogens such as diarrheagenic E. coli, Shigella, Salmonella, Vibrio, Campylobacter, Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium, and rotavirus. Atypical EPEC strains isolated as the only pathogen in stool samples were serotyped with specific antisera O1–O175 and H1–H56 acquired commercially (from the Universidad de Santiago de Compostela; Lugo, Spain). One isolate per subject was stored at -70°C in Luria Bertani broth (LB) with 15% glycerol.

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil. Stool samples were obtained with the written informed consent from the parents or guardians of the children with or without diarrhea.

Biofilm formation assay

Biofilm assays were performed in triplicate using LB medium in 96-well polystyrene microtiter plates as previously described [26]. Briefly, strains were grown overnight at 37°C in LB. The optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of the culture was adjusted to 1.0 (corresponding to ca. 108 CFU/ml). The cultures were then diluted 1:10 in fresh LB and used to inoculate three individual wells (200 μl per well). Plates were incubated statically at 26°C or 37°C for 24 h. Following these incubation periods, plates were washed three times with 250 μl/well of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The plates were dried (26°C for 15 min), and each well was stained with 200 μl 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min. The OD570 values were determined in a microplate reader after solubilization of the dye with 95% ethanol (200 μl per well). The ability of aEPEC strains to form biofilm on abiotic surfaces was assessed by comparison with the standard biofilm producing enteroaggregative E. coli 042 strain (EAEC) and a non-biofilm forming strain (E. coli HB101). Strains were classified as biofilm producers when OD570 was higher than the E. coli HB101 strain mean value (OD570 ≤ 0.5). The biofilm producer strains were also subdivided into strong (OD570 ≥ 1.0) and weak (OD570 > 0.5 < 1) in comparison to the result of the EAEC 042 strain mean value (OD570 ≥ 1.0).

Biofilms were also analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For SEM observations, coverslips in 24 well plates were used as adhesion surface. After incubation, the coverslips were washed three times with PBS and immersed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M imidazole buffer (pH 7.0) for 2 h at room temperature. The preparations were then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions (50%, 80% and absolute), dried at critical point using CO2 as the transition fluid, and sputter-coated with gold.

Pellicle formation

Strains were grown overnight in LB at 37°C and 5 ml was transferred into 4 ml LB in 15-ml glass tubes. After 48 h at 26°C or 37°C or the formation of biofilm (pellicle) at the air-liquid interface was visually observed and photographed with a digital camera.

Detection of type 1 fimbriae and curli

Type 1 fimbriae expression was detected by the mannose-sensitive hemagglutination assay (MSHA) of guinea pig erythrocytes based on the method of Evans et al. [31] with some modifications. Bacterial suspensions (~3.0 × 108 cells/ml) in PBS, prepared after growth in LB broth at 37°C for 18 h, were mixed with guinea pig red blood cells at room temperature in the presence or absence of 1% D-mannose. Curli production was evaluated on YESCA agar plates containing 40 mg/l of Congo Red (CR) and incubated for 24 h at 26°C or 37°C. Colony morphology was scored according to morphotypes previously described for S. typhimurium: red colonies are curli positive and white colonies, curli negative [32]. E. coli HB101 strain was used as a curli negative control.

PCR assays

Strains were probed by PCR for the presence of fimA and fimH (type 1 fimbriae) [33, 34], fliC (flagella) [35], csgA (curli structural subunit) [36], hcpA ( hemorrhagic coli pilus) [37], flu (antigen 43) [38], cah (calcium-binding antigen 43 homologue) [39], and ehaA (Eha passenger domain) [40] genes.

Transposon mutagenesis and genetic analysis

The aEPEC A111 strain was mutagenized with the EZ::TN < R6Kyori/KAN-2 > Tnp transposome (Epicentre) according manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, electrocompetent aEPEC cells were transformed with 1 μl of the Tnp transposome. Transposon-inserted bacterial colonies that grew on LB agar plates containing kanamycin were screened for biofilm formation as described above. Genomic DNA of the biofilm deficient mutants was digested with Eco RI and self-ligated, and used for transformation of E. coli DH5αλpir. Rescued DNA plasmids were purified and sequenced using the transposon-specific primers R6KAN-2 RP-1 and KAN-2 FP-1 (Epicentre). DNA sequencing was performed at the Centro de Estudos do Genoma Humano-USP, São Paulo. Nucleotide sequence data were analyzed using SeqMan and MegAlign software and the BLAST tool (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST).

Nucleotide sequences and accession numbers

The DNA sequences for the six mutants are availability in NCBI database under accession numbers KM044265-KM044270, respectively.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by research grants from Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo
(2)
Disciplina de Reumatologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo

References

  1. Ochoa TJ, Contreras CA: Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection in children. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011, 24: 478-483. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834a8b8b.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hill SM, Phillips AD, Walker-Smith JA: Enteropathogenic Escherichia coliand life threatening chronic diarrhea. Gut. 1991, 32: 154-158. 10.1136/gut.32.2.154.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Rothbaum R, McAdams AJ, Giannella R, Partin JC: A clinicpathologic study of enterocyte-adherent Escherichia coli: a cause of protracted diarrhea in infants. Gastroenterology. 1982, 83: 441-454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fagundes Neto U, Scaletsky IC: Escherichia coli infections and malnutrition. Lancet. 2000, 356 (Suppl): s27-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. WHO: Programme for Control of Diarrhoeal Diseases, Manual for laboratory investigation of acute enteric infections. 1987, Geneva: World Health OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  6. Nataro JP, Kaper JB: Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998, 11: 142-201.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Moon HW, Whipp SC, Argenzio RA, Levine MM, Gianella RA: Attaching and effacing activities of rabbit and human enteropathogenic Escherichia coli in pig and rabbit intestines. Infect Immun. 1983, 41: 1340-1351.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jerse AE, Yu J, Tall BD, Kaper JB: A genetic locus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli necessary for the production of attaching and effacing lesions on tissue culture cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990, 87: 7839-7843. 10.1073/pnas.87.20.7839.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jarvis KG, Girón JA, Jerse AE, McDaniel TK, Donnenberg MS, Kaper JB: Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli contains a putative type III secretion system necessary for the export of proteins involved in attaching and effacing lesion formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995, 92: 7996-8000. 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7996.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kenny B, DeVinney R, Stein M, Finlay BB: Enteropathogenic E coli (EPEC) transfers its receptor for intimate adherence into mammalian cells. Cell. 1997, 91: 511-520. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80437-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Scaletsky ICA, Silva MLM, Trabulsi LR: Distinctive patterns of adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HeLa cells. Infect Immun. 1984, 45: 534-536.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bieber D, Ramer SW, Wu CY, Murray WJ, Tobe T, Fernandez R, Schoolnik GK: Type IV pili, transient bacterial aggregates, and virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1998, 280: 2114-2118. 10.1126/science.280.5372.2114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hicks S, Frankel G, Kaper JB, Dougan G, Phillips AD: Role of intimin and bundle-forming pili in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli adhesion to pediatric intestinal tissue in vitro. Infect Immun. 1998, 66: 1570-1578.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nataro JP, Baldini MM, Kaper JB, Black RE, Bravo N, Levine MM: Detection of an adherence fator of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli with a DNA probe. J Infect Dis. 1985, 152: 560-565. 10.1093/infdis/152.3.560.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gómez-Duarte OG, Kaper JB: A plasmid-encoded regulatory region activates chromosome eae A expression in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1995, 63: 1767-1776.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Girón JA, Ho AS, Schoolnik GK: An inducible bundle-forming pilus of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1991, 254: 710-713. 10.1126/science.1683004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaper JB: Defining EPEC. Rev Microbiol São Paulo. 1996, 27: 130-133.Google Scholar
  18. Scaletsky ICA, Pedroso MZ, Oliva CAG, Carvalho RLB, Morais MB, Fagundes-Neto U: A localized adherence-like pattern as a second pattern of adherence of classic enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells that is associated with infantile diarrhea. Infect Immun. 1999, 67: 3410-3415.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Trabulsi LR, Keller R, Gomes TAT: Typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect. 2002, 8: 508-513. 10.3201/eid0805.010385.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Cookson AL, Cooley WA, Woodward MJ: The role of type 1 and curli fimbriae of Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli in adherence to abiotic surfaces. Int J Med Microbiol. 2002, 292: 195-205. 10.1078/1438-4221-00203.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Danese PN, Pratt LA, Kolter R: Exopolysaccharide production is required for development of Escherichia coli K-12 biofilm architecture. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 3593-3596. 10.1128/JB.182.12.3593-3596.2000.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pringent-Combaret C, Prensier G, Thi TT, Vidal O, Lejeune P, Dorel C: Developmental pathway for biofilm formation in curli-producing Escherichia coli strains: role of flagella, curli and colonic acid. Environ Microbiol. 2000, 2: 450-464. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2000.00128.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ryu JH, Bechaut LR: Biofilm formation by Escherichia coli O157:H7 on stainless steel: effect of exopolysaccharide and curli production on its resistance to chlorine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 247-254. 10.1128/AEM.71.1.247-254.2005.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schembri MA, Christiansen G, Klemm P: FimH-mediated autoaggregation of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2001, 41: 1419-1430. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02613.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Moreira CG, Palmer K, Whiteley M, Sircili MP, Trabulsi LR, Castro AFP, Sperandio V: Bundle-forming pili and EspA are involved in biofilm formation by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2006, 188: 3952-3961. 10.1128/JB.00177-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Weiss-Muzkat M, Shakh D, Zhou Y, Pinto P, Belausov E, Chapman MR, Sela S: Biofilm formation and multicellular behavior in Escherichia coli O55:H7, an atypical enteropathogenic strain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010, 76: 1545-1554. 10.1128/AEM.01395-09.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hernandes RT, Velsko I, Sampaio SC, Elias WP, Robins-Browne RM, Gomes TAT, Girón JA: Fimbrial adhesins produced by atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011, 77: 9391-8399.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hernandes RT, De la Cruz MA, Yamamoto D, Girón JA, Gomes TAT: Dissection of the role of pili and type 2and type 3 secretion systems in adherence and biofilm formation of an atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strain. Infect Immun. 2013, 81: 3793-3802. 10.1128/IAI.00620-13.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Jenal U, Malone J: Mechanisms of cyclic-di-GMP signaling in bacteria. Annu Rev Genet. 2006, 40: 385-407. 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090423.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Scaletsky ICA, Aranda KR, Souza TB, Silva NP, Morais MB: Evidence of pathogenic subgroups among atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains. J Clin Microbiol. 2009, 47: 3756-3759. 10.1128/JCM.01599-09.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Evans DJ, Evans DG, Dupont HL: Hemagglutination patterns of enterotoxigenic and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli determined with human, bovine, chicken, and guinea pig erythrocytes in the presence and absence of mannose. Infect Immun. 1979, 23: 336-346.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Römling U, Sierralt WD, Eriksson K, Normark S: Multicellular and aggregative behavior of Salmonella typhimurium strains is controlled by mutations in the agfD promoter. Mol Microbiol. 1998, 28: 249-264. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00791.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Welinder-Olsson C, Eriksson E, Kaijser B: Virulence genes in verocytotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from humans and cattle. APMIS. 2005, 113: 577-85. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm_252.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson JR, Stell AL: Extended virulence genotypes of Escherichia coli strains from patients with urosepsis in relation to phylogeny and host compromise. J Infect Dis. 2000, 181: 261-272. 10.1086/315217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fields PI, Blom K, Hughes HJ, Helsel LO, Feng P, Swaminathan B: Molecular characterization of the gene encoding H antigen in Escherichia coli and development of a PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism test for identification of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and O157:NM. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35: 1066-1070.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Maurer JJ, Brown TP, Steffens WL, Thayler SG: The occurrence of ambient temperature-regulated adhesins, curli, and the temperature-sensitive hemagglutinin tsh among avian Escherichia coli. Avian Dis. 1998, 42: 106-118. 10.2307/1592582.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Xicohtncatl-Cortes J, Monteiro-Neto V, Ledesma MA, Jordan DM, Francetic O, Kaper JB, Puente JL, Girón JA: Intestinal adherente associated with type IV pili of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Clin Invest. 2007, 117: 3519-3529. 10.1172/JCI30727.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Restieri C, Garriss G, Locas MC, Dozois CM: Autotransporter-encoding sequences are phylogenetically distributed among Escherichia coli clinical isolates and reference strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 73: 1553-62. 10.1128/AEM.01542-06.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Torres AG, Perna NT, Burland V, Ruknudin A, Blattner FR, Kaper JB: Characterization of Cah, a calcium-binding and heat-extractable autotransporter protein of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 2002, 45: 951-966. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03094.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wells TJ, Sherlock O, Rivas L, Mahajan A, Beatson SA, Torpdahl M, Webb R, Allsopp LP, Gobius KS, Gally DL, Schembri MA: EhaA is a novel autotransporter protein of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 that contributes to adhesion and biofilm formation. Environ Microbiol. 2008, 10: 589-604. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01479.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nascimento et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Advertisement