Table 6 The correlation between biofilm production and the antimicrobial resistance patterns
B. cereus (n = 42) |  | Resistance patterns | Biofilm production |
|---|---|---|---|
n | % | ||
18 | 42.9 | 8 Antimicrobial agents/ 6 Classes: AMP, AMX, AMC, FEP, CRO, TE, SXT, and E | Strong |
5 | 11.9 | 8 Antimicrobial agents/ 6 Classes: AMP, AMX, AMC, FEP, CRO, TE, SXT, and S | Strong |
7 | 16.7 | 8 Antimicrobial agents/ 6 Classes: AMP, AMX, AMC, FEP, CRO, TE, SXT, and S | Moderate |
3 | 7.1 | 5 Antimicrobial agents/ 3 Classes: AMP, AMX, AMC, FEP, and CRO | Moderate |
2 | 4.8 | 3 Antimicrobial agents/ 2 Classes: AMP, AMX, and SXT | Weak |
1 | 2.4 | 4 Antimicrobial agents/ 2 Classes: AMP, AMX, FEP, and CRO | Weak |
1 | 2.4 | 3 Antimicrobial agents/ 2 Classes: AMP, AMX, and TE | Weak |
5 | 7.1 | 3 Antimicrobial agents/ 2 Classes: AMP, AMX, and TE | Non-biofilm producers |