Table 3 Antibiotic resistance profiles of the investigated strains
Resistance profile | Antibiotic(s) | No. of E. faecalis (%) | No. of E. faecium (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
A | Non-resistant to all antibiotics | 55 (67.1) | 15 (53.6) |
B | R: AMP | 0 | 2 (7.1) |
C | R: IPM | 2 (2.4) | 0 |
D | R: VAN | 1 (1.2) | 1 (3.6) |
E | R: GN-HLR | 8 (25.0) | 3 (10.7) |
F | R: ST-HLR | 2 (2.4) | 0 |
G | R: LIN | 1 (1.2) | 0 |
H | R: NFE, GN-HLR | 1 (1.2) | - |
I | R: AMP, ST-HLR | 1 (1.2) | 0 |
J | R: VAN, GN-HLR | 1 (1.2) | 0 |
K | R: GN-HLR, ST-HLR | 2 (2.4) | 0 |
L | R: LVX, NXN | 1 (1.2) | 0 |
M | R: QDF, LIN | - | 1 (3,6) |
N | R: IPM, ST-HLR, KNM | 1 (1.2) | 0 |
O | R: AMP, IPM, LIN | 1 (1.2) | 0 |
P | R: VAN, GN-HLR, ST-HLR | 1 (1.2) | 0 |
R | R: CIP, LVX, NXN | 0 | 1 (3.6) |
S | R: LVX, NXN, QDF | - | 1 (3.6) |
T | R: AMP, GN-HLR, ST-HLR, KNM | 0 | 1 (3.6) |
U | R: AMP, IPM, TEC, VAN | 0 | 1 (3.6) |
W | R: IPM, CIP, LVX, NXN | 1 (1.2) | 0 |
X | R: CIP, LVX, NXN, GN-HLR | 1 (1.2) | 0 |
Y | R: AMP, TEC, VAN, LIN, KNM | 0 | 1 (3.6) |
Z | R: IPM, CIP, LVX, NXN, VAN | 0 | 1 (3.6) |
ZX | R: AMP, IPM, CIP, NXN, TEC, VAN | 1 (1.2) | 0 |
ZY | R: AMP, IPM, TEC, VAN, GN-HLR, ST-HLR, KNM | 1 (1.2) | 0 |