Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of an automated DNA extraction and 16S rDNA real time PCR/sequencing diagnostic method using optimized reagents with culture during a 15-month study using specimens from sterile body sites

Original Submission
12 Oct 2021 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
20 Dec 2021 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 Feb 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
18 Feb 2022 Author responded Author comments - Konrad Egli
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Feb 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Mar 2022 Author responded Author comments - Konrad Egli
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Mar 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 6
15 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
28 Mar 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
12 Apr 2022 Author responded Author comments - Konrad Egli
Resubmission - Version 7
12 Apr 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
18 Apr 2022 Editorially accepted
2 May 2022 Article published 10.1186/s12866-022-02542-w

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page