Fig. 3
From: Comparison of targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro methods for analysing the lung microbiome
![Fig. 3](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12866-021-02288-x/MediaObjects/12866_2021_2288_Fig3_HTML.png)
Graph of the DESeq2 analysis showing the log2fold differential abundance of the different genera between targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro methods (n = 23) in the sputum microbiome of COPD participants. Differences were considered significant with the p-value (adjusted for false discovery rate using Benjamini–Hochberg correction) cut-off of 0.01. Log2fold changes greater than zero indicated an increase in the relevant genera, whereas log2fold changes less than zero indicated a decrease in the relevant genera. All genera above the zero line had an increased relative abundance with the IS-Pro method when compared to targeted metagenomics. The error bars corresponding to the calculated lfcSE (standard error)