Table 5 Statistical differences in Wolbachia relative abundance between control (C) and evolved (E) populations
Experiment | C min | C max | C avg | E min | E max | E avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Desiccation resistance | ||||||
 Relative abundance | 0.775 | 0.906 | 0.849 | 0.926 | 0.936 | 0.932 |
 Kruskal-Wallis X2 = 3.8571, df = 1, p-value = 0.04953 | ||||||
Fluctuating temperature | ||||||
 Relative abundance | 0.488 | 0.757 | 0.628 | 0.685 | 0.752 | 0.723 |
 Kruskal-Wallis X2 = 1.0519, df = 1, p-value = 0.3051 | ||||||
Starvation resistance | ||||||
 Relative abundance | 0.837 | 0.854 | 0.844 | 0.918 | 0.943 | 0.932 |
 Kruskal-Wallis X2 = 3.8571, df = 1, p-value = 0.04953 | ||||||
Viral resistance | ||||||
 Relative abundance | 0.955 | 0.977 | 0.968 | 0.98 | 0.984 | 0.981 |
 Kruskal-Wallis X2 = 7.3846, df = 1, p-value = 0.006578 | ||||||