Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparative analysis of relative thickness and diameter of A. muciniphila outer membrane on different media under dynamic culture

From: Study of growth, metabolism, and morphology of Akkermansia muciniphila with an in vitro advanced bionic intestinal reactor

Tukey’s multiple comparisons test

Mean 1

Mean 2

Summary

Adjusted P Value

a: BHI vs. PM

70.66

101.2

*

0.0159

a: BHI vs. HM

70.66

104.5

**

0.0072

a: BHI vs. BPM

70.66

71.46

ns

> 0.9999

a: BHI vs. BHM

70.66

72.11

ns

> 0.9999

a: PM vs. HM

101.2

104.5

ns

0.9934

a: PM vs. BPM

101.2

71.46

*

0.0177

a: PM vs. BHM

101.2

72.11

*

0.0152

a: HM vs. BPM

104.5

71.46

**

0.008

a: HM vs. BHM

104.5

72.11

**

0.0068

a: BPM vs. BHM

72.11

72.11

ns

> 0.9999

b: BHI vs. PM

871

985

*

0.0137

b: BHI vs. PM

871

999.3

**

0.0035

b: BHI vs. BPM

871

980

*

0.0136

b: BHI vs. BHM

871

971.7

*

0.0214

b:PM vs. HM

985

999.3

ns

0.4533

b:PM vs. BPM

985

980

ns

0.9623

b:PM vs. BHM

985

971.7

ns

0.589

b:HM vs. BPM

999.3

980

ns

0.5442

b:HM vs. BHM

999.3

971.7

ns

0.3824

b: BPM vs. BHM

980

971.7

ns

0.1124

  1. Note: a: Relative thickness of the outer membrane of A. muciniphila, b: Diameter of A. muciniphila. The brain heart infusion broth (BHI), porcine mucin (PM), human mucin (HM), BHI+ porcine mucin (BPM), and BHI+ human mucin (BHM). The data are shown as the mean ± SD (n = 4) and analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01