Skip to main content

Table 3 REP profiles detected in 72 nursery pigs from a Danish intensive pig farm

From: Genotype variation and genetic relationship among Escherichia coli from nursery pigs located in different pens in the same farm

REP profile N col (%) REP profile N col (%) REP profile N col (%) REP profile N col (%)
REP_1 3 (0.4%) REP_21 3 (0.4%) REP_41 2 (0.3%) REP_61 2 (0.1%)
REP_2 (P4)a 171 (23.7%) REP_22 1 (0.1%) REP_42 5 (0.7%) REP_62 (P24)b 1 (0.1%)
REP_3 6 (0.8%) REP_23 2 (0.3%) REP_43 1 (0.1%) REP_63 3 (0.4%)
REP_4 113 (15.7%) REP_24 3 (0.4%) REP_44 1 (0.1%) REP_64 1 (0.1%)
REP_5 (P3)a 168 (23.3%) REP_25 1 (0.1%) REP_45 2 (0.3%) REP_65 4 (0.5%)
REP_6 13 (1.8%) REP_26 1 (0.1%) REP_46 1 (0.1%) REP_66 1 (0.1%)
REP_7 8 (1.1%) REP_27 5 (0.7%) REP_47 (P32)b 1 (0.1%) REP_67 2 (0.3%)
REP_8 (P24)b 1 (0.1%) REP_28 4 (0.5%) REP_48 1 (0.1%) REP_68 1 (0.1%)
REP_9 (P26)b 3 (0.4%) REP_29 1 (0.1%) REP_49 1 (0,1%) REP_69 (P31)b 1 (0.1%)
REP_10 5 (0.7%) REP_30 (P25)b 1 (0.1%) REP_50 1 (0.1%) REP_70 2 (0.3%)
REP_11 2 (0.3%) REP_31 2 (0.3%) REP_51 1 (0.1%) REP_71 1 (0.1%)
REP_12 1 (0.1%) REP_32 1 (0.1%) REP_52 1 (0.1%) REP_72 2 (0.3%)
REP_13 2 (0.3%) REP_33 1 (0.1%) REP_53 (P27)b 2 (0.3%) REP_73 (P29)b 1 (0.1%)
REP_14 1 (0.1%) REP_34 1 (0.1%) REP_54 1 (0.1%) REP_74 4 (0.5%)
REP_15 2 (0.3%) REP_35 1 (0.1%) REP_55 (P28)b 1 (0.1%) REP_75 (P35)b 2 (0.3%)
REP_16 1 (0.1%) REP_36 5 (0.7%) REP_56 (P33)b 2 (0.3%)   
REP_17 (P2)a 79 (11%) REP_37 (P30)b 1 (0.1%) REP_57 2 (0.3%)   
REP_18 12 (1.7%) REP_38 5 (0.7%) REP_58 3 (0.4%)   
REP_19 23 (3.2%) REP_39 3 (0.4%) REP_59 1 (0.1%)   
REP_20 4 (0.5%) REP_40 1 (0.1%) REP_60 1 (0.1%)   
  1. N col number of colonies showing this profile
  2. aprofiles marked with awere also found to be the dominant ones in a previous study on genetic diversity of E. coli between different pig farms [11]
  3. bprofiles marked with bwere exclusively detected in this farm in our previous study [11]