Skip to main content

Table 1 Yeast mutant strains exhibiting low AMT efficiency

From: DNA repair genes RAD52 and SRS2, a cell wall synthesis regulator gene SMI1, and the membrane sterol synthesis scaffold gene ERG28 are important in efficient Agrobacterium-mediated yeast transformation with chromosomal T-DNA

Yeast strain (genotype)

AMT efficiencya

AMT efficiency of complemented strainb

TKC efficiencyc

Growth of yeast cells (fold)d

Growth ratio

 

% of wild type ± SD

% of wild type ± SD

% of wild type ± SD

(A) with donor cells

(B) w/o donor cells

(A/B)

wild type

(100)

(100)

(100)

3.5 ± 1.7

11.8 ± 4.1

0.30

srs2Δ

5.6 ± 2.8**

103.2 ± 21.7

102.2 ± 22.2

5.3 ± 2.2

15.3 ± 6.9

0.34

rad52Δ

4.8 ± 1.9**

187.9 ± 41.1*

52.5 ± 27.2*

4.7 ± 0.2

6.1 ± 0.6

0.77

smi1Δ

5.0 ± 2.4**

87.8 ± 5.1*

49.8 ± 27.2*

4.8 ± 2.2

10.0 ± 3.8

0.48

erg28Δ

24.5 ± 9.5**

123.3 ± 70.4

25.1 ± 18.6**

8.4 ± 1.5

8.2 ± 1.3

1.02

  1. a Yeast strains were cocultivated with Agrobacterium strain EHA105 (pBY1). The AMT efficiency of the wild type yeast strain was (1.9 ± 0.1) × 10-3
  2. b Each mutant strain was introduced a corresponding wild type gene cloned in centromeric vector pRS313 (see Table 4). The AMT efficiency of the wild type strain harboring the pRS313 vector was (4.1 ± 1.7) × 10-3
  3. c Yeast strains were cocultivated with E. coli strain HB101 (pRH210, pAY205) for trans-kingdom conjugation ( TKC). The TKC efficiency of the wild type yeast strain was (1.2 ± 0.3) × 10-3
  4. d Fold increase of recipient cell number after co-cultivation (A) with or (B) without donor cells. Each value is the average of three experiments. SD = standard deviations
  5. Differences were statistically significant compared to the wild type strain by Student’s t-test. *p <0.05, **p <0.01