Skip to main content

Table 1 The 20 most abundant OTUs in chicken cecum

From: Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences

Closest culturable isolate

Isolate accession number

% similarity

% in cecal

% in fecal

OTU ID

Bacteroides fragilis

CR626927

99.62

14.1

1.2

4

Lactobacillus crispatus

Y17362

99.81

11.3

15.4

1

Lactobacillus johnsonii

ACGR01000047

99.61

9.6

12.2

2

Lactobacillus salivarius

AF089108

99.43

5.4

12.7

3

Lactobacillus reuteri

AP007281

99.40

4.3

5.6

5

Acholeplasma palmae

L33734

79.53

3.9

0.5

8

Lactobacillus helveticus

ACLM01000202

97.62

3.5

8.6

133

Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum

EU410376

82.18

3.4

0.2

9

Faecalibacterium prausnitzii

AJ413954

94.71

2.3

0.3

12

Lactobacillus vaginalis

AF243177

99.60

1.3

0.8

10

Lactobacillus helveticus

ACLM01000202

96.67

1.2

2.7

874

Pontibacillus litoralis

EU583724

78.46

0.9

0.2

13

Exiguobacterium acetylicum

X70313

78.33

0.9

0.1

14

Ruminococcus albus

L76598

82.62

0.9

0.1

21

Ruminococcus albus

L76598

89.88

0.8

0.1

16

Parabacteroides distasonis

CP000140

97.31

0.8

0.0

18

Ruminococcus flavefaciens

X83430

86.85

0.8

0.1

15

Clostridium cellobioparum

X71856

83.27

0.7

0.1

17

Clostridium termitidis

FR733680

80.37

0.7

0.1

23

Clostridium symbiosum

M59112

91.97

0.7

0.1

25

  1. The representative sequences for all abundant OTUs are publically available in EMBL database with OTU ID as identifier with accession numbers HG810851- HG810882.