Skip to main content
Download PDF

Molecular investigation of Blastocystis in children and calves in Bangladesh

BMC Microbiology volume 24, Article number: 316 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Blastocystis, a widely distributed zoonotic protozoan infecting both humans and numerous animals, remains poorly understood with its potential medical and veterinary significance. This study examined the molecular occurrence and genetic variation of Blastocystis in children and calves in Bangladesh to explore cross-species transmission and disease burden.

Methods

In total, 998 DNA samples were investigated, comprising 299 stool DNA from children and 699 fecal DNA from calves, using polymerase chain reaction and sequencing of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene.

Results

This study detected Blastocystis in 5.35% of the children and 14.74% of the calves. While slight variations in occurrence rates were observed across different study variables, none were statistically significant. The occurrence was highest among children under 5 years and calves aged 1–3 months. Regarding breed, the Holstein Friesian cross and the Jersey cross exhibited higher rates of infection. Conversely, occurrences were lower among children and calves in Gazipur district. The remaining parameters displayed nearly equivalent percentages of Blastocystis. The subtypes identified in children included ST1, ST3, and ST4, with ST1 comprising 50% of them. ST3 and ST4 were also found in calves, alongside ST10 (55.34%) being the most prevalent. Other subtypes found in calves were ST14, ST21, and ST24–ST26.

Conclusions

This study found that Blastocystis is more common in calves than in children in Bangladesh, with genetic diversity of nine subtypes. The common occurrence of identical variants of two subtypes in both populations suggests potential zoonotic transmission, highlighting the necessity for further molecular investigations and comprehensive measures within the One Health framework to mitigate public health risks.

Peer Review reports

Background

Blastocystis, an anaerobic single-celled organism, is an enteric protist parasite ubiquitous in both humans and various animals [1, 2]. Despite numerous efforts to classify Blastocystis, its taxonomy and pathogenicity remain elusive, demonstrating the genetic diversity and intricate evolutionary history of the organism [3,4,5]. Forty-six different subtypes (STs) of Blastocystis have been reported (ST1–ST46), each with unique genetic traits and potentially varying characteristics [4, 6]. However, only 42 of these subtypes are considered legitimate with ST18–ST20 and ST22 considered invalid. Among these 42 subtypes, 14 (ST1-ST10, ST12, ST14, ST16, and ST23) have zoonotic implications [7, 8].

In recent decades, researchers have increasingly focused on the pathogenicity of Blastocystis. Symptoms such as diarrhea, bloating, abdominal pain, irritable bowel syndrome, nausea, acute urticaria, ulcerative colitis, and the development of colorectal cancer have been linked to blastocystosis. Moreover, some patients may remain asymptomatic [9, 10]. Interestingly, however, Blastocystis is also being linked to a healthy gut microbiome [11]. Individuals with symptoms often carry not only Blastocystis but also other parasites, making it unclear which organism is causing the symptoms. Consequently, there is no concrete evidence that Blastocystis poses a public health risk, leading to a growing consensus that it is a commensal rather than a pathogen. Nevertheless, Blastocystis is widespread in both human and animal hosts. It has also been detected in the environment, including soil, water, and vegetables [12, 13]. Due to its ubiquity, Blastocystis serves as an excellent model for studying transmission dynamics and One Health approaches.

The transmission patterns of Blastocystis are closely linked with its life cycle, with transmission mainly occurring through the fecal-oral route. Importantly, Blastocystis is infectious only in its cyst form [14], allowing it to thrive in environmental reservoirs and spread through contaminated food, water, and other sources [15, 16]. The growing interaction between humans and animals, fueled by factors such as agriculture, urbanization, industrialization, and globalization, creates opportunities for cross-species transmission with implications for the emergence and spread of zoonotic diseases, including blastocystosis [17]. Globally, Blastocystis infection rate has been reported to range from 0.5 to 100% in humans, with some studies showing a high prevalence above 80%, possibly due to poor hygiene practices in lower-income communities as well as zoonotic and human-to-human transmission through the fecal-oral route [18]. Meanwhile, the prevalence of Blastocystis in cattle was found to be around 25% worldwide [18]. The occurrence of Blastocystis has been increasingly associated with demographic factors, including age, gender, and education level among humans, as well as specific breeds of cattle [19]. In addition to the sociodemographic elements, close contact with infected animals, water source quality, and direct human contact are considered significant risk factors [20].

In Bangladesh, Blastocystis may pose significant public health risks with up to 80% infection rate, particularly among vulnerable populations such as malnourished individuals living in overcrowded slum areas [21]. The infection itself may cause gastrointestinal disorders and eventually lead to malnutrition, creating a vicious cycle of health deterioration. While studies on Blastocystis in humans [21,22,23] and zoo animals [24] have been conducted separately in Bangladesh, there is a lack of research focusing on molecular detection among livestock and children from different parts of the country. In this context, this study identified the occurrence rate and genetic variations of Blastocystis in children and calves in four different locations in Bangladesh. Furthermore, we aimed to explore different variables influencing the transmission of Blastocystis between humans and animals, contributing to targeted interventions for reducing the occurrence of Blastocystis and zoonotic transmission.

Methods

Sample and PCR amplification

We examined 998 fecal DNA samples, with 299 from children and 699 from calves, as part of our earlier research on Giardia [25], Enterocytozoon [26], and Cryptosporidium [27]. The minimum sample sizes for this study were calculated using the formula n = Z2P(1 − P)/d2, with prevalences of 10% for children and 30% for calves, aiming for a precision of 5% at a 95% confidence level. The required minimum sample sizes were calculated to be 139 for children and 323 for calves. The fecal samples were collected randomly from children and calves in the districts of Gazipur, Sirajganj, Pabna, and Dhaka (Central Cattle Breeding and Dairy Farm) (Fig. 1). The study was designed in such a way that children were from the same household from where samples of calves were collected. Consequently, most of the children’s samples were obtained from the same household.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Locations of the study area in Bangladesh

Full size image

Blastocystis was identified through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene using the TaKaRa Taq DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa, Japan) enzyme. The 25 µL of total reaction volume comprised 2.5 µL of 10x PCR Buffer, 2 µL of dNTP mixture, 0.2 µL of enzyme, 0.4 µL of forward (RD5: 5′-ATCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT-3′) and reverse (BhRDr: 5′-GAGCTTTTTAACTGC AACAACG-3′) primers, 2 µL of template DNA, and 17.5 µL of PCR-grade water [28]. PCR amplification was performed at an annealing temperature of 55 °C for 45 s per cycle. The accuracy of the results was validated through three repeated tests, with positive control (DNA from calf feces) and negative control (distilled water) incorporated into each PCR batch.

DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

The PCR products with the desired band size were delivered to Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for bidirectional sequencing. The resultant forward and reverse sequences were viewed and edited using ClustalW and ChromasPro software (Technelysium Pty Ltd., South Brisbane, Australia). The consensus sequences were queried against the GenBank database using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) to identify matches. The subtypes of Blastocystis isolates were determined using the Blastocystis locus/sequence definition database in the PubMLST [29].

The phylogenetic analysis was conducted with 29 characteristic sequences from this study and 43 reference sequences from the GenBank. Following alignment and analysis, the sequences were processed using MUSCLE, embedded in the MEGA11 program [30]. Following alignment trimming with trimAl, which was facilitated by the online platform Phylemon 2.0 [31], the Blastocystis isolates of this study were subjected to phylogenetic analysis using neighbor-joining (NJ) methodology to contrast with known subtypes. The robustness of clusters was assessed using a bootstrap method with 1,000 replicates. The tree was outrooted with Karotomorpha (DQ431242). Thus, the Blastocystis subtypes were further confirmed by phylogenetic analysis.

Statistical analysis

The Chi-squared test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the possible association between Blastocystis occurrence and variables such as age, gender, and location of children and calves, as well as breed, feces conformation, and health status of the calves. A p < 0.05 value was set as the significant threshold and the analysis was carried out using the stats and associated packages in the R programming language.

Results

Occurrence of Blastocystis in children and calves

Out of 299 stool samples collected from children, 16 tested positive for Blastocystis, resulting in an occurrence rate of 5.35% (Table 1). The association of study regions, genders, and age groups with Blastocystis occurrence was not statistically significant. Meanwhile, Blastocystis was found in 14.74% (103/699) of the calves. The prevalence rates did not exhibit significant variations based on study location, gender, age, breed, fecal consistency, or health status (Table 2). No significant associations of various factors with the occurrences of Blastocystis were found in the multivariate logistic regression analyses either (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 1 Occurrence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in children. Association of several variables with Blastocystis occurrence in children has been explored using chi-squared test
Full size table
Table 2 Occurrence and subtype of Blastocystis in calves. Association of several variables with Blastocystis occurrence in calves has been explored using chi-squared test
Full size table
Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the factors associated with Blastocystis occurrence in children
Full size table
Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the factors associated with Blastocystis occurrence in calves
Full size table

Blastocystis subtypes in children and calves

The SSU rRNA gene was successfully sequenced in all Blastocystis isolates from children and calves. The sequence analysis identified three Blastocystis subtypes (ST1, ST3, and ST4) in children (Table 1). The predominant subtype in children was ST1 (50%). In calves, eight subtypes (ST3, ST4, ST10, ST14, ST21, ST24, ST25, and ST26) were identified, with ST10 (55.34%) being the most prevalent subtype (Table 2). Identical variants of two subtypes, ST3 and ST4, were identified in both children and calves from the same locations.

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic analysis illustrated the clustering of sequences from nine identified subtypes (ST1, ST3, ST4, ST10, ST14, ST21, ST24, ST25, and ST26) with their respective reference subtype sequences (Fig. 2). The constructed tree delineated isolates belonging to the same subtype, clustering together with substantial bootstrap support, thereby affirming the independent monophyletic status of the nine subtypes.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Blastocystis isolates from children and calves and their phylogenetic relationship at the SSU rRNA gene. The subtypes found in this study are represented by filled triangles and bold texts

Full size image

Discussion

Although numerous studies worldwide have reported variable prevalence rates of Blastocystis (Fig. 3), there are only a limited number of epidemiological studies conducted in Bangladesh. The molecular occurrence of Blastocystis infection among children in this study was found to be 5.45% (16/299). A microscopic study conducted in the Mirpur slum revealed a higher occurrence of Blastocystis (14%) among children, likely due to poor hygiene, inadequate healthcare, overall lifestyle factors, and different identification techniques [21]. The finding of our study aligned somewhat with a study from Nepal, where the formalin-ether concentration technique detected Blastocystis in 4% of children [32]. However, a molecular study revealed that 25.6% of children with gastrointestinal symptoms in Nepal carried Blastocystis [33]. Similarly, in India, a microscopic study reported an occurrence rate of 14.7% among children [34]. The rate was substantially higher in a molecular study among adults in Dhaka with a rate of 78.6% [23], possibly linked to their habitat in the slum area. Another microscopic study in Dhaka reported a rate of 36.4%, with most participants being immunocompromised patients with HIV. In neighboring countries, India and Nepal, the molecular occurrence rates were similar, at 27% [35] and 26.1% [36], respectively. A Chinese systematic review reported a slightly lower occurrence rate of 3.37% [37]. In contrast, a study encompassing children from six different countries (Azerbaijan, Jordan, Nigeria, Sudan, and Tanzania) found a much higher overall prevalence of 36% [38]. Children from Brazil exhibited a notably high pooled prevalence of 86.63%, possibly influenced by the timing of the study following a gastroenteritis outbreak in the region [39]. In northern Thailand, prevalence rates varied significantly, ranging from 67 to 89% across different time points, likely reflecting the impact of environmental factors in rural areas. Meanwhile, children in Panama and China showed occurrences of 21.2% [40] and 14.3% [41].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Overview of global occurrence and reported subtypes of Blastocystis in (A) humans and (B) cattle

Full size image

Regarding calf fecal samples, 103 out of 699 samples tested positive for Blastocystis, indicating a prevalence rate of 14.74%. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first molecular study on Blastocystis in calves in Bangladesh. The outcome of the study was almost similar to the occurrence in Nepal (16.67%) [16]. However, the rate was lower in molecular studies conducted in Korea (6.7%) [42], Iran (9.6%) [43], and China (10.3%) [44]. In Colombia, two studies on Blastocystis reported occurrences of 80% and 77.58% [45, 46]. Similarly, the rates were higher in Lebanon (63.4%) [47], Japan (54.1%) [48], and Turkey (58.7%) [49]. Occurrences below 50% were reported in nations such as Brazil (21.4%) [50], the United Arab Emirates (22.7%) [51], Spain (32.1%) [52], Italy (33%) [53], and Malaysia (34.5% and 43.8%) [10, 54]. Interestingly, the infection rate was even higher in Indonesia, where Blastocystis showed a 100% occurrence according to the study. This raises significant questions about whether Blastocystis should be classified as a pathogen or a commensal protozoan [55].

Blastocystis isolates from children for this study were subtyped as ST1, ST2, and ST3, among which the most prevalent subtype was ST1 (50%), followed by ST3 (31.25%) and ST4 (18.75%). Similarly, in children from Panama, the most prevalent subtype was ST1 (42.2%), followed by ST3 (31.8%) [40]. However, Nepalese studies reported ST4 to be predominant in children, which was later changed to ST6 following consensus terminology [33, 36]. In Thailand [56], China [41], and some other Asian and African countries [38], the predominant subtype was ST3, followed by ST1 and ST2.

The identification of 16 distinct subtypes in cattle worldwide, including ST1–ST7, ST10, ST12, ST14, ST17, ST21, and ST23–ST26, emphasizes that cattle serve as a favorable reservoir for various Blastocystis genetic variants, including some zoonotic subtypes [18]. This study identified subtypes ST3, ST4, ST10, ST14, ST21, and ST24–ST26 in calves. Consistent with Shams et al. (2021), ST10 emerged as the prevalent subtype in this study, detected in 57 out of 103 isolates from calves (55.34%). Similarly, in China and Japan, ST10 was the prevalent subtype in cattle, followed by subtypes ST14 and ST4 [48, 57]. However, a recent study has proposed dividing some ST10 sequences as new subtypes ST42–ST44 [58].

Subtypes ST3 (PP581304, PP581306) and ST4 (PP581307, PP581308) isolated from both children and calves were found to be identical variants, suggesting a potential zoonotic transmission between the hosts from the same locations (Pabna and Sirajganj districts). However, ST10 and ST14 are considered animal-specific subtypes with no proven zoonotic significance [59]. A recent report detected ST10 and ST14 in stool samples from healthy school-going children in Senegal, but conclusive evidence regarding their zoonotic nature is still lacking [60].

For risk analysis, several factors were considered, including the location, gender, and age of children, and the location, sex, age, breed, fecal conformation, and health status of cattle. The occurrence rate did not vary significantly by any of these factors, all falling within the range of 4–6%, except for infants under 5 years of age, which exhibited a 7.3% rate of Blastocystis. This might indicate that younger children may be more susceptible to infection due to factors such as a less developed immune system and potentially poorer hygiene practices, as they are more likely to engage in behaviors that increase exposure to pathogens. However, these factors did not show any significant association with Blastocystis infection. Geographical and environmental factors were found to affect the occurrence of Blastocystis in cattle in a previous study [42]. The lack of statistically significant differences in prevalence based on gender, region, or breed in both populations through chi-square test and logistic regression analyses suggests a relatively uniform distribution of Blastocystis across the study area, potentially pointing to shared environmental or socio-economic factors that influence transmission.

Given that the children sampled were from households that reared cattle, the interaction between humans and animals may be a crucial factor in understanding transmission dynamics. Environmental factors, such as shared water sources and sanitation practices, are critical to consider, as they can significantly influence the prevalence rates observed [15, 16]. Soil contamination from the fecal matter of infected cattle can create environmental reservoirs, increasing the risk for children who may play in these areas. These factors can contribute to the persistence of Blastocystis cysts in the environment, highlighting the importance of proper waste management and hygiene measures. Socio-economic factors, although not directly measured in this study, likely play a role, as households that rear cattle may have varying access to healthcare and sanitation facilities [17]. Further investigation is needed to conclusively confirm the genuine impact of these risk factors on both human and cattle populations in Bangladesh. Including environmental samples from the premises they inhabit would strengthen the study within the One Health framework.

Conclusions

Blastocystis was found to be less prevalent in children with only three subtypes (ST1, ST3, and ST4), while its occurrence was common among calves in this study. Out of the nine subtypes identified, eight (ST3, ST4, ST10, ST14, ST21, ST24, ST25, and ST26) were isolated from calves. The presence of identical variants of ST3 and ST4 in both children and calves from the same locations suggests potential zoonotic transmission through the food chain. Considering the close animal-human interaction and environmental exposure of pathogens in Bangladesh, further epidemiological studies are important for understanding the transmission pattern of this protozoan. Finally, comprehensive measures to mitigate blastocystosis should be implemented across livestock and health sectors within the One Health frameworks.

Data availability

All unique SSU rRNA gene sequences from this study were archived in the GenBank database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) under unique accession numbers. The accession numbers range from PP581301 to PP581329.

References

  1. Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR, Vidal-Lapiedra A, Onuoha ESU, Fagbenro-Beyioku AF, Clark CG. Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications. Acta Trop. 2013;126:11–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROTIS.2013.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ruang-areerate T, Piyaraj P, Suwannahitatorn P, Ruang-areerate P, Thita T, Naaglor T, et al. Zoonotic transmission of Blastocystis Subtype 1 among people in Eastern communities of Thailand: Organic Fertilizer from Pig feces as a potential source. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9:e00362–21. https://doi.org/10.1128/Spectrum.00362-21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Skotarczak B. Genetic diversity and pathogenicity of Blastocystis. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2018;25:411–6. https://doi.org/10.26444/AAEM/81315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gentekaki E, Curtis BA, Stairs CW, Klimeš V, Eliáš M, Salas-Leiva DE, et al. Extreme genome diversity in the hyper-prevalent parasitic eukaryote Blastocystis. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2003769. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PBIO.2003769.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Parija SC, Padukone S, Blastocystis. Pathogen or passenger? An evaluation of 101 years of research. Trop Parasitol. 2016;6:163. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.190838.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Maloney JG, Molokin A, Seguí R, Maravilla P, Martínez-Hernández F, Villalobos G, et al. Identification and molecular characterization of Four New Blastocystis subtypes designated ST35-ST38. Microorganisms. 2022;11:46. https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS11010046.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Stensvold CR, Clark CG. Pre-empting Pandora’s Box: Blastocystis subtypes Revisited. Trends Parasitol. 2020;36:229–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koehler AV, Herath HMPD, Hall RS, Wilcox S, Gasser RB. Marked genetic diversity within Blastocystis in Australian wildlife revealed using a next generation sequencing–phylogenetic approach. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2024;23:100902. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPPAW.2023.100902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Popruk S, Adao DEV, Rivera WL. Epidemiology and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in humans: a review. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;95:105085. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEEGID.2021.105085.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamaruddin SK, Yusof AM, Mohammad M. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in cattle from Pahang, Malaysia. Trop Biomed. 2020;37:127–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aykur M, Malatyalı E, Demirel F, Cömert-Koçak B, Gentekaki E, Tsaousis AD, et al. Blastocystis: a mysterious member of the gut Microbiome. Microorganisms. 2024;12:461. https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS12030461.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Elseadawy R, Abbas I, Al-Araby M, Abu-Elwafa S. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Acanthamoeba, Naegleria fowleri and Blastocystis in water samples from various sources in Egypt. Acta Trop. 2023;237:106733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106733.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Jinatham V, Maxamhud S, Popluechai S, Tsaousis AD, Gentekaki E. Blastocystis One Health Approach in a Rural Community of Northern Thailand: prevalence, subtypes and Novel Transmission routes. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:746340. https://doi.org/10.3389/FMICB.2021.746340.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Parija SC, Jeremiah S. Blastocystis: taxonomy, biology and virulence. Trop Parasitol. 2013;3:17. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5070.113894.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshikawa H, Epidemiology. Transmission, and zoonotic potential of Blastocystis in Human and animals. In: Mehlhorn H, Tan K, Yoshikawa H, editors. Blastocystis: Pathogen or passenger? Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. pp. 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32738-4_3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee LI, Chye TT, Karmacharya BM, Govind SK. Blastocystis sp.: Waterborne zoonotic organism, a possibility? Parasit Vectors. 2012;5:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-5-130

  17. Shrestha K, Acharya KP, Shrestha S. One health: the interface between veterinary and human health. Int J One Health. 2018;4:8–14. https://doi.org/10.14202/IJOH.2018.8-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shams M, Shamsi L, Sadrebazzaz A, Asghari A, Badali R, Omidian M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the global prevalence and subtypes distribution of Blastocystis sp. infection in cattle: a zoonotic concern. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;76:101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CIMID.2021.101650.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammad NA, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Moktar N, Anuar TS. Prevalence and risk factors of Blastocystis infection among underprivileged communities in rural Malaysia. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2017;10:491–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APJTM.2017.05.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Anuar TS, Ghani MKA, Azreen SN, Salleh FM, Moktar N. Blastocystis infection in Malaysia: evidence of waterborne and human-to-human transmissions among the Proto-Malay, Negrito and Senoi tribes of Orang Asli. Parasit Vectors. 2013;6:40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-6-40.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fahim SM, Gazi MA, Hasan MM, Alam MA, Das S, Mahfuz M, et al. Infection with Blastocystis spp. and its association with enteric infections and environmental enteric dysfunction among slum-dwelling malnourished adults in Bangladesh. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021;15:e0009684. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PNTD.0009684.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoshikawa H, Wu Z, Kimata I, Iseki M, Ali IKMD, Hossain MB, et al. Polymerase chain reaction-based genotype classification among human blastocystis hominis populations isolated from different countries. Parasitol Res. 2004;92:22–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00436-003-0995-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barua P, Khanum H, Haque R, Najib F, Kabir M. Establishment of Blastocystis Hominis in-vitro culture using fecal samples from infants in slum area of Mirpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Acta Med Int. 2015;2:40. https://doi.org/10.5530/AMI.2015.1.34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li J, Karim MR, Li D, Rahaman Sumon SMM, Siddiki SHMF, Rume FI, et al. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis sp. in captive wildlife in Bangladesh National Zoo: non-human primates with high prevalence and zoonotic significance. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019;10:314. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPPAW.2019.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Li J, Karim MR, Siddiki SHMF, Chen Y, Qin Z, Rume FI, et al. Potential zoonotic transmission of Giardia duodenalis between children and calves in Bangladesh. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2023;2023:8224587. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8224587.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Karim MR, Rume FI, Li D, Li J, Zhang L. First molecular characterization of Enterocytozoon Bieneusi in children and calves in Bangladesh. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022;69:1999–2007. https://doi.org/10.1111/TBED.14187.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Karim MR, Li J, Harun AB, Rume FI, Zhang L. Molecular characterization and zoonotic risk assessment of Cryptosporidium spp. in children and calves in Bangladesh. One Health. 2024;18:100692. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ONEHLT.2024.100692.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Scicluna SM, Tawari B, Clark CG. DNA barcoding of Blastocystis. Protist. 2006;157:77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROTIS.2005.12.001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Blastocystis typing database. https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_blastocystis_seqdef. Accessed 30 June 2024.

  30. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:3022–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Phylemon 2. http://phylemon.bioinfo.cipf.es. Accessed 30 June 2024.

  32. Mukhiya R, Rai S, Karki AB, Prajapati A. Intestinal protozoan parasitic infection among School Children. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012;10:204–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoshikawa H, Wu Z, Pandey K, Pandey BD, Sherchand JB, Yanagi T, et al. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis isolates from children and rhesus monkeys in Kathmandu, Nepal. Vet Parasitol. 2009;160:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VETPAR.2008.11.029.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Rayan P, Verghese S, McDonnell PA. Geographical location and age affects the incidence of parasitic infestations in school children. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2010;53:504–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0377-4929.68292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pandey PK, Verma P, Marathe N, Shetty S, Bavdekar A, Patole MS, et al. Prevalence and subtype analysis of Blastocystis in healthy Indian individuals. Infect Genet Evol. 2015;31:296–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEEGID.2015.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee IL, Tan TC, Tan PC, Nanthiney DR, Biraj MK, Surendra KM, et al. Predominance of Blastocystis sp. subtype 4 in rural communities, Nepal. Parasitol Res. 2012;110:1553–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2665-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Deng L, Chai Y, Zhou Z, Liu H, Zhong Z, Hu Y, et al. Epidemiology of Blastocystis sp. infection in China: a systematic review. Parasite. 2019;26:41. https://doi.org/10.1051/PARASITE/2019042.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Cinek O, Polackova K, Odeh R, Alassaf A, Kramná L, Ibekwe MAU, et al. Blastocystis in the faeces of children from six distant countries: prevalence, quantity, subtypes and the relation to the gut bacteriome. Parasit Vectors. 2021;14:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04859-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rebolla MF, Silva EM, Gomes JF, Falcão AX, Rebolla MVF, Franco RMB. High prevalence of Blastocystis Spp. Infection in children and staff members attending Public Urban schools in São Paulo State, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2016;58:31. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-9946201658031.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Perea M, Vásquez V, Pineda V, Samudio F, Calzada JE, Saldaña A. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. infecting children from a rural community in Panama. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2020;9:e00139. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PAREPI.2020.E00139.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Qi M, Wei Z, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Li J, Zhang L, et al. Genetic diversity of Blastocystis in kindergarten children in southern Xinjiang, China. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-3890-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee H, Lee SH, Seo MG, Kim HY, Kim JW, Lee YR, et al. Occurrence and genetic diversity of Blastocystis in Korean cattle. Vet Parasitol. 2018;258:70–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VETPAR.2018.06.010.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Badparva E, Sadraee J, Kheirandish F. Genetic Diversity of Blastocystis Isolated from Cattle in Khorramabad, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8:14810. https://doi.org/10.5812/JJM.14810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhu W, Tao W, Gong B, Yang H, Li Y, Song M, et al. First report of Blastocystis infections in cattle in China. Vet Parasitol. 2017;246:38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.VETPAR.2017.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ramírez JD, Sánchez LV, Bautista DC, Corredor AF, Flórez AC, Stensvold CR. Blastocystis subtypes detected in humans and animals from Colombia. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;22:223–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEEGID.2013.07.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Higuera A, Herrera G, Jimenez P, García-Corredor D, Pulido-Medellín M, Bulla-Castañeda DM, et al. Identification of multiple blastocystis subtypes in domestic animals from Colombia using amplicon-based next generation sequencing. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:732129. https://doi.org/10.3389/FVETS.2021.732129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Greige S, El Safadi D, Khaled S, Gantois N, Baydoun M, Chemaly M, et al. First report on the prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in dairy cattle in Lebanon and assessment of zoonotic transmission. Acta Trop. 2019;194:23–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTATROPICA.2019.02.013/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Masuda A, Sumiyoshi T, Ohtaki T, Matsumoto J. Prevalence and molecular subtyping of Blastocystis from dairy cattle in Kanagawa, Japan. Parasitol Int. 2018;67:702–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PARINT.2018.07.005.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Tavur A, Önder Z. Molecular prevalence and phylogenetic characterization of blastocystis in cattle in Kayseri Province, Turkey. Kocatepe Vet J. 2022;15:1–6. https://doi.org/10.30607/KVJ.996557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Moura RGF, de Oliveira-Silva MB, Pedrosa AL, Nascentes GAN, Cabrine-Santos M. Occurrence of Blastocystis spp. in domestic animals in Triângulo Mineiro area of Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2018;51:240–3. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0484-2016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. AbuOdeh R, Ezzedine S, Madkour M, Stensvold CR, Samie A, Nasrallah G, et al. Molecular subtyping of Blastocystis from Diverse animals in the United Arab Emirates. Protist. 2019;170:125679. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROTIS.2019.125679.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Abarca N, Santín M, Ortega S, Maloney JG, George NS, Molokin A, et al. Molecular detection and characterization of Blastocystis sp. and enterocytozoon bieneusi in cattle in Northern Spain. Vet Sci. 2021;8(e119). https://doi.org/10.3390/VETSCI8090191.

  53. Gabrielli S, Palomba M, Furzi F, Brianti E, Gaglio G, Napoli E, et al. Molecular subtyping of Blastocystis sp. Isolated from Farmed Animals in Southern Italy. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1656. https://doi.org/10.3390/VETSCI8090191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hemalatha C, Chandrawathani P, Premaalatha B, Geethamalar S, Lily R, Haziqah F, et al. The diagnosis of Blastocystis sp. from animals - an emerging zoonosis. Malays J Vet Res (Putrajaya). 2014;5:15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Susana Y, Suwanti LT, Suprihati E. Identification and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in beef cattle in Siak Sri Indrapura, Riau, Indonesia. Indones J Trop Infect Dis. 2019;7:155. https://doi.org/10.20473/ijtid.v7i6.10392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. McCain A, Gruneck L, Popluechai S, Tsaousis AD, Gentekaki E. Circulation and colonisation of Blastocystis subtypes in schoolchildren of various ethnicities in rural northern Thailand. Epidemiol Infect. 2023;151:e77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268823000596.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Nemati S, Zali MR, Johnson P, Mirjalali H, Karanis P. Molecular prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Asia and in Australia. J Water Health. 2021;19:687–704. https://doi.org/10.2166/WH.2021.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Santin M, Figueiredo A, Molokin A, George NS, Köster PC, Dashti A, et al. Division of Blastocystis ST10 into three new subtypes: ST42-ST44. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2024;71:e12998. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12998.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang J, Fu Y, Bian X, Han H, Dong H, Zhao G, et al. Molecular identification and genotyping of Blastocystis sp. in sheep and goats from some areas in Inner Mongolia, Northern China. Parasitol Int. 2023;94:e102739. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PARINT.2023.102739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Khaled S, Gantois N, Ly AT, Senghor S, Even G, Dautel E, et al. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Senegalese School Children. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1408. https://doi.org/10.3390/MICROORGANISMS8091408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the staff from the Milk Vita, Sirajganj and Central Cattle Breeding and Dairy Farm, Savar, Dhaka for their assistance in collecting samples.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MoST), Bangladesh, under the Special Allocation for Science and Technology (Grant No. SRG-221181), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102698), and the Leading Talents of Thousand Talents Program of Central China (19CZ0122).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh

    Md Robiul Karim, Anas Bin Harun, Abdullah Al Bayazid & S. H. M. Faruk Siddiki

  2. College of Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengdong Newly-Developed Area, No. 15 University District, Zhengzhou, 450046, China

    Junqiang Li & Longxian Zhang

Authors
  1. Md Robiul Karim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anas Bin Harun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdullah Al Bayazid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. H. M. Faruk Siddiki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Junqiang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Longxian Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MRK conceptualized, designed, acquired funding and resources, investigated, analyzed, wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. ABH investigated, performed coding and illustration, analyzed, wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. AAB contributed to the investigation and illustration. SHMFS was involved in sampling and reviewing the manuscript. JL conceptualized, acquired funding, wrote, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. LZ conceptualized, designed, supervised, acquired funding, reviewed, and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Junqiang Li or Longxian Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Animal Research Ethics Committee (AREC) of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University (BSMRAU) reviewed the methodology of this study and approved it. The process of gathering data and samples started after the research objectives were explained and the owners of the calves as well as the parents or legal guardians of the children gave their written informed consent. Furthermore, this study received authorization from the Central Cattle Breeding and Dairy Farm (CCBDF) in Savar, Dhaka, and the General Hospital in the Sirajganj district.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karim, M.R., Harun, A.B., Bayazid, A. et al. Molecular investigation of Blastocystis in children and calves in Bangladesh. BMC Microbiol 24, 316 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03476-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03476-1

Keywords

BMC Microbiology

ISSN: 1471-2180

Contact us