Skip to main content

Table 2 Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of biofilm forming and non-forming isolates as detected by TCP method

From: High level of persister frequency in clinical staphylococcal isolates

Antibiotics

Biofilm

Antibiotics

Biofilm

Positive

(n = 86)

Negative

(n = 289)

P value

Positive

(n = 86)

Negative

(n = 289)

P value

Oxacillin

Tetracycline

 Range

0.125–64

0.125–64

 

 Range

0.125–8

0.125–8

 

 MIC50

1

1

 

 MIC50

0.5

0.5

 

 MIC90

64

64

 

 MIC90

2

8

 

 % resistance

65 (37.4%)

93 (46.3%)

*

 % resistance

8 (4.6%)

22 (10.9%)

0.076

Vancomycin

Clindamycin

 Range

0.125–8

0.125–8

 

 Range

0.125–1024

0.125–1024

 

 MIC50

2

2

 

 MIC50

0.125

0.125

 

 MIC90

4

4

 

 MIC90

256

128

 

 % resistance

-

-

*

 % resistance

32 (18.4%)

36 (17.9%)

0.479

Cotrimoxazole

Penicillin

 Range

0.5/9.5–16/304

0.5/9.5–16/304

 

 Range

0.125–8

0.125–8

 

 MIC50

2/38

16

 

 MIC50

0.25

0.5

 

 MIC90

16/304

512

 

 MIC90

8

4

 

 % resistance

78 (44.8%)

76 (37.8%)

0.265

 % resistance

132 (75.9%)

163 (81.1%)

0.017

Erythromycin

Ciprofloxacin

 Range

0.125–1024

0.125–1024

 

 Range

0.125–256

0.125–256

 

 MIC50

16

64

 

 MIC50

8

8

 

 MIC90

1024

1024

 

 MIC90

128

128

 

 % resistance

102 (58.6%)

139 (69.2%)

0.375

 % resistance

104 (59.8%)

115 (57.2%)

0.985

Chloramphenicol

Gentamicin

 Range

0.125–32

1–32

 

 Range

0.125–128

0.125–128

 

 MIC50

4

4

 

 MIC50

1

2

 

 MIC90

8

8

 

 MIC90

64

64

 

 % resistance

7 (4.0%)

12 (6.0%)

0.028

 % resistance

81 (46.6%)

98 (48.8%)

0.225

  1. The MICs values of the isolates were determined by the agar dilution method. The sensitivity towards each antibiotic was compared between biofilm forming and non-forming isolates. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate the statistical significance of differences in the results. The p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
  2. *The resistant range of MIC values of oxacillin and vancomycin is different for S. aureus and CNS. For this reason, p value is not mentioned in the table. The sensitivity of oxacillin (n = 45, 58.4%) in biofilm producers (n = 77) vs sensitivity (n = 38, 45.2%) in biofilm non-producers S. aureus was not significantly different (p = 0.542). Whereas the sensitivity of oxacillin (n = 76, 84.4%) in biofilm producers vs. sensitivity (n = 96, 77.4%) in biofilm non-producers CNS were significantly different (p = 0.086). Irrespective of whether biofilm producers or not, all the isolates were vancomycin susceptible (Supplementary Table 1).