Table 4 The MDR/ XDR phenotype of InPEC and ExPEC isolates against antimicrobial agents of different classes
Type of resistance | Resistance patterns | Numer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
ExPEC | InPEC | total | ||
XDR | Resistance to at least one antimicrobial agents of eight antimicrobial classes CTX/ CTX, CAZ + KF/ KF, CXM + TZP + FOX + AZT + STR, CN, KAN, SH + CIP, ENR + NA | 0 | 1 | 1 |
XDR | Resistance to at least one antimicrobial agents of seven antimicrobial classes CTX/ FEP, CTX, CAZ/ CTX, CAZ + KF, CXM + TZP + AZT + STR/ STR, CN, KAN, SH/ STR, SH, KAN/ SH, CN, AMI + CIP, ENR/ ENR + NA | 4 | 1 | 5 |
MDR | Resistance to at least one antimicrobial agents of six antimicrobial classes CAZ/ CTX + KF/ KF, CXM + TZP + STR, KAN/ STR, KAN, AMI / STR, SH, CN, KAN + ENR / ENR, CIP + NA FEP, CTX, CAZ + KF, CXM + TZP + FOX + AZT + STR, SH, CN, KAN | 3 | 0 | 3 |
MDR | Resistance to at least one antimicrobial agents of five antimicrobial classes CAZ + KF + TZP + FOX +NA CTX + KF, CXM + TZP + AZT + STR | 2 | 0 | 2 |
MDR | Resistance to at least one antimicrobial agents of four antimicrobial classes CTX + STR + CIP / CIP, ENR + NA FEP, CTX, CAZ + KF, CXM + FOX + STR CTX + KF, CXM + TZP + ARE, CN, KAN KF + STR, KAN + ENR, CIP + NA | 4 | 1 | 5 |
MDR | Resistance to at least one antimicrobial agents of three antimicrobial classes TZP + STR, KAN + NA CAZ + STR, CN + NA KF / STR / STR, KAN / CN + CIP, ENR + NA | 6 | 1 | 7 |