The resistance of peanut to soil-borne pathogens improved by rhizosphere probiotics under calcium treatment

BMC Microbiology

Table 2 T-test for the relative abundance of dominantspecies at the pod filling stage

Taxonomy	Relative abundance (%)		t	P
Taxonomy	P.S	PC.S	0.141	P
Sphingomonas changbaiensis	0.0855 ± 0.0140	1.6120 ± 0.0575	−8.531	0.001
Novosphingobium panipatense	0.0316 ± 0.0191	0.2490 ± 0.2490	−6.234	0.003
Lysobacter sp. AM20–91	0.0149 ± 0.0049	0.1124 ± 0.0162	−5.763	0.004
Deinococcus ficus	0	0.0084 ± 0.0016	−5.196	0.007
Pseudochrobactrum saccharolyticum	0.0019 ± 0.0019	0.1217 ± 0.0255	−4.695	0.009
Acinetobacter guillouiae	0.0074 ± 0.0049	0.0418 ± 0.0056	−4.625	0.010
Devosia riboflavina	0	0.0139 ± 0.0032	−4.330	0.012
Trachydiscus minutus	0.0009 ± 0.0009	0.0084 ± 0.0016	−4.000	0.016
Legionella massiliensis	0	0.0056 ± 0.0016	−3.464	0.026
Sphingomonas paucimobilis	0.0112 ± 0.0043	0.0437 ± 0.0043	−2.877	0.045

Note: Values are mean ± standard error of three replicates. P.S: Rhizosphere soil microbiome without calcium application at the pod filling stage. PC.S: Rhizosphere soil microbiome with calcium application at the pod filling stage

ISSN: 1471-2180