Table 1 Comparison of the relative abundance at a phylum level and genus level for the targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro methods
From: Comparison of targeted metagenomics and IS-Pro methods for analysing the lung microbiome
Taxon | Targeted metagenomics | IS-Pro method | Increase/ Decrease (↑/↓) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Phylum level | ||||
 Firmicutes | 57.1 % | 40.5 % | ↓ | |
 Proteobacteria | 16 % | 38 % | ↑ | |
 Bacteroidetes | 10.3 % | 12.4 % | ↑ | |
 Actinobacteria | 12.3 % | 2.5 % | ↓ | |
 Fusobacteria | 2.3 % | 6.6 % | ↑ | |
Genus level | ||||
 Actinomyces | 5.72 % | 0.74 % | ↓ | |
 Burkholderia | 0.00 % | 0.82 % | ↑ | |
 Corynebacterium | 0.11 % | 0.78 % | ↑ | |
 Eikenella | 0.01 % | 0.82 % | ↑ | |
 Escherichia | 0.00 % | 0.22 % | ↑ | |
 Fusobacterium | 0.30 % | 6.49 % | ↑ | |
 Granulicatella | 3.60 % | 0.00 % | ↓ | |
 Lactobacillus | 0.10 % | 2.64 % | ↑ | |
 Leptotrichia | 2.44 % | 0.00 % | ↓ | |
 Micrococcus | 0.00 % | 0.30 % | ↑ | |
 Neisseria | 0.02 % | 0.692 % | ↑ | |
 Oleomonas | 0.003 % | 0.00 % | ↓ | |
 Parvimonas | 0.20 % | 0.74 % | ↑ | |
 Peptostreptococcus | 0.04 % | 1.69 % | ↑ | |
 Proteus | 0.00 % | 0.39 % | ↑ | |
 Pseudomonas | 0.02 % | 0.69 % | ↑ | |
 Serratia | 3.75 % | 0.78 % | ↓ | |
 Veillonella | 4.99 % | 0.00 % | ↓ | |