Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between PTB and EPTB regarding laboratory diagnostic methods (AFB smear, LJ culture and Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay)

From: Diagnostic utility of GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay versus conventional methods for diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary tuberculosis

Laboratory methods

PTB(n = 449)

EPTB(n = 133)

X2

Pvalue

AFB smear

 Negative

300 (66.8%)

81 (60.9%)

2.22

0.70

 +

40 (8.9%)

12 (9.0%)

 ++

31 (6.9%)

10 (7.5%)

 +++

44 (9.8%)

18 (13.5%)

 ++++

34 (7.6%)

12 (9.0%)

AFB smear

 Negative

300 (66.8%)

81 (60.9%)

1.59

0.21

 Positive

149 (33.2%)

52 (39.1%)

LJ culture

 Positive

122 (27.2%)

38 (28.6%)

0.10

0.75

 Negative

327 (72.8%)

95 (71.4%)

Gene Xpert MTB/RIF assay

 Invalid

42 (9.4%)

11 (8.3%)

1.55

0.46

 Positive

111 (24.7%)

40 (30.1%)

 Negative

296 (65.9%)

82 (61.7%)

Rifampicin resistance

(n = 111)

(n = 40)

  

 Yes

14 (12.6%)

13 (32.5%)

7.92

0.005*

 No

97 (87.4%)

27 (67.5%)

  1. X2 Chi square test
  2. *Significant statistical difference