Skip to main content

Table 2 Parameter estimates for the final multivariable linear mixed regression model for filter matings

From: Effect of donor-recipient relatedness on the plasmid conjugation frequency: a meta-analysis

 

Included data points

Log10(T / D)

n

%

Mean

95% CI

Reference

 

270

100

−5.38

−9.37

−1.40

Relatedness toE. colidonor

 Same species

130

48.1

Reference

 Same family

88

32.6

1.61

0.74

2.47

 Same class

22

8.1

0.59

−1.03

2.22

 Other class

30

11.1

0.64

−5.37

6.65

Recipient origin

 Laboratory strain

116

43.0

Reference

 Human

57

21.1

−0.86

−1.80

0.08

 Dairy cattle

44

16.3

−2.16

−3.37

−0.94

 Plant

16

5.9

−2.67

−6.75

1.41

 Water

10

3.7

−6.10

−7.89

−4.31

 Food

5

1.9

−2.29

−4.20

−0.39

 Acidic drainage of a hot-spring

2

0.7

−1.37

−8.50

5.77

 NR

20

7.4

−2.26

−4.56

0.03

Donor-to-recipient ratio

 0.05–0.125

80

29.6

−2.59

−6.48

1.30

 0.25–0.50

54

20.0

2.42

−0.83

5.68

 1.00

124

45.9

Reference

 3.00

10

3.7

−1.94

−8.31

4.44

 NR

2

0.7

1.48

−3.50

6.46

Temperature (°C)

 5

3

1.1

3.48

1.44

5.52

 20–30

49

18.1

−0.15

−1.90

1.60

 35–37

190

70.4

Reference

 42–47

6

2.2

−0.03

−1.48

1.41

 NR

22

8.1

1.06

−1.67

3.80

Mating time (h)

  ≤ 4

102

37.8

Reference

 4.01–8.0

17

6.3

−1.80

−5.97

2.38

 16–24

114

42.2

−3.63

−6.94

−0.31

 30

27

10.0

−3.21

−7.70

1.29

 48–72

10

3.7

−2.99

−10.78

4.81

Filter pore size (μm)

 0.20–0.22

17

6.3

Reference

 0.40–0.45

229

84.8

3.51

−1.35

8.38

 NR

24

8.9

2.61

−2.59

7.82

  1. CI confidence interval; D initial number of donors; n: number of data points; NR not reported; T number of transconjugants. The value given as ‘Reference’ denotes the mean log10(T/D) if all variables are equal to their reference category, i.e., if the recipient is an E. coli laboratory strain, and the experiment is performed with a donor-to-recipient ratio of 1.00, a temperature of 35–37 °C and less than 4 h mating time on a filter with a 0.20–0.22 μm pore size. The values for the other categories list the differences from that overall mean