|
Sample
|
OTUs
|
ACE
|
Chao1
|
Shannon
|
Simpson
|
Coverage(%)
|
Effective Tags
|
|---|
|
16S rDNA
|
|
CK
|
1217 ± 254 a
|
1394 ± 219 a
|
1405 ± 212 a
|
6.921 ± 0.072 b
|
0.971 ± 0.004 a
|
99.730 ± 0.027 a
|
84,020 ± 5587 a
|
|
SA
|
1239 ± 56 a
|
1437 ± 89 a
|
1465 ± 92 a
|
7.570 ± 0.402 a
|
0.982 ± 0.010 a
|
99.614 ± 0.048 b
|
87,206 ± 2441 a
|
|
DA
|
1206 ± 198 a
|
1422 ± 198 a
|
1438 ± 196 a
|
6.909 ± 0.406 b
|
0.971 ± 0.011 a
|
99.645 ± 0.019 b
|
82,879 ± 8562 a
|
|
AO
|
1022 ± 72 a
|
1178 ± 79 a
|
1185 ± 76 a
|
6.614 ± 0.117 b
|
0.959 ± 0.002 b
|
99.734 ± 0.004 a
|
86,932 ± 5643 a
|
|
18S rDNA
|
|
CK
|
214 ± 25 a
|
252 ± 43 b
|
244 ± 30 a
|
1.288 ± 0.258 c
|
0.264 ± 0.062 c
|
99.953 ± 0.009 ab
|
11,664 ± 3851 c
|
|
SA
|
209 ± 26 a
|
262 ± 13 ab
|
262 ± 20 a
|
2.729 ± 0.107 a
|
0.706 ± 0.073 a
|
99.940 ± 0.002 bc
|
11,934 ± 1426 c
|
|
DA
|
240 ± 7 a
|
291 ± 7 a
|
292 ± 4 a
|
3.182 ± 0.497 a
|
0.763 ± 0.053 a
|
99.934 ± 0.005 c
|
14,693 ± 8656 a
|
|
AO
|
163 ± 5 b
|
195 ± 22 c
|
195 ± 14 b
|
1.922 ± 0.066 b
|
0.478 ± 0.017 b
|
99.961 ± 0.009 a
|
13,682 ± 2948 b
|
|
ITS
|
|
CK
|
118 ± 10 a
|
129 ± 1 a
|
133 ± 11 a
|
3.006 ± 0.110 a
|
0.785 ± 0.026 a
|
99.977 ± 0.002 a
|
77,855 ± 1035 c
|
|
SA
|
76 ± 5 b
|
88 ± 9 b
|
89 ± 8 b
|
2.423 ± 0.148 b
|
0.713 ± 0.028 a
|
99.984 ± 0.003 a
|
10,744 ± 2269 ab
|
|
DA
|
59 ± 6 c
|
78 ± 25 b
|
78 ± 1 b
|
1.219 ± 0.615 c
|
0.354 ± 0.211b
|
99.983 ± 0.006 a
|
94,962 ± 9216 b
|
|
AO
|
60 ± 5 c
|
69 ± 8 b
|
70 ± 9 b
|
1.692 ± 0.181 c
|
0.495 ± 0.040 b
|
99.986 ± 0.005 a
|
11,038 ± 6244 a
|
- The cutoff value was 0.03 (sequence identity 0.97). ACE and Chao1 indices were used to evaluate the community richness, while Shannon and Simpson indices were used to assess the community diversity. The values of mean ± SD of three samples are shown in the table. The different letters superscript indicate significant differences. CK, SA, DA represent the healthy, diseased, and decayed algae samples respectively. AO represents the sediment samples collected from the algae farm
