Skip to main content

Table 1 Top twenty most abundant genera identified for each sample type

From: Comparative diversity of microbiomes and Resistomes in beef feedlots, downstream environments and urban sewage influent

 

Fecal Composite

Catch Basin

Soil

Sewage influent

No.

Genus

Phylum

Proportion

Genus

Phylum

Proportion

Genus

Phylum

Proportion

Genus

Phylum

Proportion

1

Prevotella

Bacteroidetes

12.02%

Thauera

Proteobacteria

12.20%

Bradyrhizobium

Proteobacteria

8.19%

Acinetobacter

Proteobacteria

29.16%

2

Bacteroides

Bacteroidetes

11.32%

Psychrobacter

Proteobacteria

9.83%

Streptomyces

Actinobacteria

5.47%

Aeromonas

Proteobacteria

16.25%

3

Treponema

Spirochaetes

6.76%

Corynebacterium

Actinobacteria

5.09%

Actinoplanes

Actinobacteria

4.60%

Arcobacter

Proteobacteria

8.68%

4

Bifidobacterium

Actinobacteria

5.67%

Arcobacter

Proteobacteria

4.38%

Mycobacterium

Actinobacteria

3.22%

Bacteroides

Bacteroidetes

8.13%

5

Methanobrevibacter

Euryarchaeota

5.08%

Sphaerochaeta

Spirochaetes

4.16%

Pseudomonas

Proteobacteria

3.15%

Moraxella

Proteobacteria

6.38%

6

Clostridium

Firmicutes

4.74%

Pseudomonas

Proteobacteria

3.73%

Rhodopseudomonas

Proteobacteria

2.69%

Acidovorax

Proteobacteria

4.75%

7

Chryseobacterium

Proteobacteria

4.31%

Fermentimonas

Bacteroidetes

3.13%

Sphingomonas

Proteobacteria

2.48%

Pseudomonas

Proteobacteria

3.85%

8

Streptococcus

Firmicutes

2.91%

Desulfobulbus

Proteobacteria

2.43%

Burkholderia

Proteobacteria

2.37%

Tolumonas

Proteobacteria

1.29%

9

Intestinimonas

Firmicutes

2.80%

Desulfomicrobium

Proteobacteria

2.19%

Mesorhizobium

Proteobacteria

2.32%

Klebsiella

Proteobacteria

1.03%

10

Psychrobacter

Proteobacteria

2.76%

Thiocystis

Proteobacteria

2.08%

Conexibacter

Actinobacteria

1.85%

Thauera

Proteobacteria

0.85%

11

Roseburia

Firmicutes

2.50%

Allochromatium

Proteobacteria

1.96%

Methylobacterium

Proteobacteria

1.71%

Parabacteroides

Bacteroidetes

0.76%

12

Oscillibacter

Firmicutes

2.48%

Ruminiclostridium

Firmicutes

1.69%

Corynebacterium

Actinobacteria

1.56%

Streptococcus

Firmicutes

0.63%

13

Lachnoclostridium

Firmicutes

2.10%

Methanocorpusculum

Euryarchaeota

1.55%

Amycolatopsis

Actinobacteria

1.47%

Flavobacterium

Bacteroidetes

0.59%

14

Ruminococcus

Firmicutes

1.66%

Geobacter

Proteobacteria

1.54%

Pseudonocardia

Actinobacteria

1.41%

Enterobacter

Proteobacteria

0.56%

15

Eubacterium

Firmicutes

1.65%

Marichromatium

Proteobacteria

1.36%

Lysobacter

Proteobacteria

1.29%

Sebaldella

Fusobacteria

0.53%

16

Corynebacterium

Actinobacteria

1.60%

Azoarcus

Proteobacteria

1.34%

Sphingopyxis

Proteobacteria

1.26%

Candidatus Cloacimonas

Candidatus Cloacimonas

0.51%

17

Odoribacter

Bacteroidetes

1.51%

Desulfovibrio

Proteobacteria

1.02%

Variovorax

Proteobacteria

1.23%

Citrobacter

Proteobacteria

0.50%

18

Escherichia

Proteobacteria

1.44%

Acidovorax

Proteobacteria

0.87%

Xanthomonas

Proteobacteria

1.22%

Alicycliphilus

Proteobacteria

0.48%

19

Alistipes

Bacteroidetes

1.17%

Sulfurimonas

Proteobacteria

0.81%

Rhizobium

Proteobacteria

1.13%

Alistipes

Bacteroidetes

0.48%

20

Lactobacillus

Firmicutes

1.08%

Rhodobacter

Proteobacteria

0.78%

Pseudoxanthomonas

Proteobacteria

1.08%

Peptoclostridium

Firmicutes

0.47%

  1. Top twenty most abundant genera constituted 76, 62, 50 and 62% of microbiota of fecal composite, catch basin, soil and urban sewage influent samples respectively