Skip to main content

Table 1 Incidence and prevalence of isolated candida species among different patient categories using VITEK2 YST® platform

From: The emergence of non-albicans candidemia and evaluation of HiChrome Candida differential agar and VITEK2 YST® platform for differentiation of Candida bloodstream isolates in teaching hospital Kandy, Sri Lanka

Category of patients

Candida isolates in blood culture from VITEK2 YST® platform

Number of cases

Period prevalence (%)

Incidence/100,000-person years

Comments and p value

Overall

C. albicans

34

1.7 X 10 −4%

0.113

0.03 non- albicans period prevalence and incidence was significantly higher than candidemia following albicans

Non- albicans

76

4.1 X 10 −4%

0.23

C. parapsilosis

22

1.1 X 10 −4%

0.07

C. tropicalis

18

1.0 X 10 −4%

0.06

C. krusei

12

8 X 10 −5%

0.04

C. glabrata

12

8 X 10 − 5%

0.04

C. haemulonii

6

4 X 10 −5%

0.02

Other

6

4 X 10 −5%

0.02

Neonates in intensive care units

C. albicans

2

2 X 10 −3%

0.133

0.02 non- albicans period prevalence and incidence was significantly higher than candidemia following albicans

Non- albicans

8

9 X 10−3%

0.6

C. parapsilosis

1

2 X 10 −3%

0.133

C. tropicalis

3

3 X 10 −3%

0.2

C. krusei

1

2 X 10 −3%

0.133

C. glabrata

2

2 X 10 −3%

0.133-

C. haemulonii

0

  

Infants in intensive care units

C. albicans

6

3 X 10–3%

0.2

0.04 non- albicans period prevalence and incidence was significantly higher than candidemia following albicans

Non- albicans

7

6 X 10–3%

0.4

C. parapsilosis

1

2 X 10–3%

0.133

C. tropicalis

3

1.5 X 10–3%

0.1

C. glabrata

2

1.5 X 10–3%

0.066

C. krusei

1

1 X 10–3%

0.066

C. haemulonii

0

  

Adults in intensive care units

C. albicans

22

1.8 X 10–4%

0.12

0.02 non- albicans period prevalence and incidence was significantly higher than candidemia following albicans

Non- albicans

56

3.8 X 10–4%

0.25

C. parapsilosis

20

1.4 X 10–4%

0.09

C. tropicalis

12

9 X 10–5%

0.06

C. glabrata

9

6 X 10–5%

0.04

C. krusei

9

6 X 10–5%

0.04

C. haemulonii

6

3 X 10–5%

0.02

Immunocompromised patients (having neutropeniaa)

C. albicans

22

1.1 X 10–3%

1.13

0.03 non- albicans period prevalence and incidence was significantly higher than candidemia following albicans

Non- albicans

51

3.4 X 10–3%

1.68

C. tropicalis

16

8 X 10–4%

0.53

C. parapsilosis

10

5 X 10–4%

0.33

C. glabrata

10

5 X 10–4%

0.33

C. krusei

10

5 X 10–4%

0.33

C. haemulonii

5

1.1 X 10–5%

0.16

  1. aNeutropenia – neutrophil count < 500 / mm3; p < 0.05 taken as significant